LEGO Hulkbuster Review

[@TiagoCatarino]

*LEGO sets in this video:* Hulkbuster ❯ bit.ly/3LLdrS3 Lighthouse ❯ bit.ly/3ZI5GCb Iron Man ❯ bit.ly/3EYcbXU Bowser ❯ bit.ly/45c8ZTo Tallneck ❯ bit.ly/3ZCHh0N Boutique Hotel ❯ bit.ly/45fwSJL

[@Anvil1137]

You mentioned that it is unusual that this set comes with multiple light bricks and didn't recall any others with two. I own a Lego creator set with two light bricks. Set 5892.

[@addi498]

Honestly, I don’t think there has ever been a set with such an overwhelmingly bad reception.

[@Seti12345]

Black Panther bust?

[@addi498]

@@Seti12345 That looks ok at least. Unlike whatever this is.

[@Seti12345]

@@addi498 basically all of the high price Marvel sets have been disappointing. Whatever design team they have working on this line, they need to change

[@addi498]

@@Seti12345 I absolutely agree with that. They should really be bringing the designers who work on the SW UCS or ICONS sets over.

[@Seti12345]

@@addi498 to be honest I’d rather have great icons sets than Marvel

[@ghostxfairy]

Agreed. Makes no sense to sacrifice accurate looks for a gimmick when the set is primarily meant as a display piece for adults.

[@Brixxter]

On top of that the feature requires you to own another set which really should be a no go for these massive sets. For that price tag they could have easily included that figure

[@inspirer4763]

It's not even a good iron man figure. Just a cheapo CCBS system toy for small children, they don't belong together at all.

[@megatron8561]

Yeah it's so dumb it looks so bad

[@dezrettel407]

A gimmick that involves hiding one of your sets

[@danielwhittaker5184]

Depends on how you might see the set maybe like: 1 Not fussed about the fitting Iron Man figure gimmick. 2 Like the idea of adding the Iron Man figure as you have it already. or 1 Gimmick of a £40 Iron Man figure 76206 set add-on for the £475 Hulkbuster set 2 Gimmick of a £475 Hulk buster set add-on for the £40 Iron Man figure 76206 set

[@JPOG7TV]

This set is proof that just because something is big, doesn’t mean it’s good.

[@water6956]

It's not the size of the wand, it's the magic in it

[@manray7189]

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

[@Matt..S]

The sigh of relief of a million men across the globe could be heard just now.

[@jangomango66]

@@water6956 😏

[@pewpewdragon4483]

proportion > size

[@KastaRules]

It takes GUTS to be this brutally honest. Thank You Tiago

[@Gzilla313]

Every LAN review I've seen of this so far has been negative. Overly expensive, fragile, gappy, lack of articulation in hands/knees, poor accuracy, poor minifigure, etc. Not one reviewer has come close to recommending the set.

[@sseltrek1a2b]

good to see...people have a tendency to stay overly positive even on the worst products, which is completely unhelpful...Lego is usually pretty solid, but they're going to have misfires, and this seems to be a big one...

[@stingergg]

Lego sent this set for him and he still do honest review. Thank you Tiago

[@stoopidapples1596]

i don't really think so. haven't seen a single sponsored review say this is a good set.

[@danielwhittaker5184]

@@sseltrek1a2b Problem is that being a critic or being honest on Lego flaws might have Lego cut off sending you free stuff to review so reviewers tend to favour the product regardless of it how good/bad it is. Sometimes but not always a review from a person who bought the set with real money (with no chance of getting Lego free from Lego) may be more honest as they have nothing really to lose by a honest review.

[@BoomBrickz]

Great review, I like that people are giving this set a real honest review. It’s such a shame this was not a perfect model, I would have preferred not to be able to fit the buildable iron man inside. I think there will be some great mocs coming soon but it shouldn’t need it especially at that price!

[@Gzilla313]

Since Tony's feet would be around the Hulkbuster's knees, the should have removed the buildable 43's legs so the torso of the Hulkbuster could have been shorter. But that still doesn't fix that the stomach and chest are supposed to be angled so the arc reactor comes to a point in the center of torso and the front of this is flat.

[@BoomBrickz]

@@Gzilla313 yep completely agree, the proportions are just off, which is disappointing

[@danielwhittaker5184]

When Lego do 1/2 a job they leave it up to the fan to pick up from where they left off.

[@BoomBrickz]

@@danielwhittaker5184 shouldn’t have to should we 😔

[@danielwhittaker5184]

@@BoomBrickz Should be optional because Lego do the leg work but you buy the set and then it can make you out of pocket doing mods. Just hope that the original design can be salvaged with a improved MOD to be improved ideally using the same existing parts rearranged for a polished finished look.

[@ml4757]

The one thing that really excites me with this is how people can take the pieces and make something better out of it / fix the proportions and issues to make a properly accurate AOU Hulkbuster like the photoshop Hachiroku made.

[@WillemDafoeOfficial]

We shouldn't need to do that when we're paying a ton of money

[@davesargent7304]

Why not just make a moc then? Save $$$

[@ml4757]

@@davesargent7304 Very pricey, of course, but it has all the parts you'd need to make a better Hulkbuster.

[@ml4757]

@@h2owl205 The Photoshopped one doesn't even look impossible to make. There's most likely a way to make a revamped Hulkbuster out of this set that looks exactly like the Photoshop.

[@fortnitesexman]

aou? this is for infinity war

[@mpdacey]

2:35 I know the Lego Technic Batmobile based on "The Batman" has two Lego light bricks in it. One for the front of the car and another for the engine at the back.

[@TiagoCatarino]

Did not know that! Thanks!

[@koendecrock]

@@TiagoCatarino The Hogwarts Express (yes the 500 USD one) has three light-bricks. Re this set: If only it were a gigantic Avengers Tower

[@jardex2275]

@@koendecrock At least Avengers Tower could be minifigure scale. Imagine something like The Daily Bugle set that was released a few years ago, but with MCU elements and characters.

[@JB-ym4up]

The set called lights and bricks was $30 and had 2 light bricks.

[@repapeti98]

I feel like the smaller set, 76105 was an overall better value with more sidebuilds that actually made for a complete set.

[@UsernameGeri]

2:50 funnily for me that is the most distracting bit, as the front chest plate is way too low on this model, compared to the "real" thing. It's basically vertical here, whereas it should be more at a 45° angle and a lot higher as well.

[@ki-adimundi8695]

I feel bad for the designer who put his soul into this project, only to be (rightfully) endlessly critiqued

[@frenchfriedbagel7035]

It was his choice to compromise the design for a gimmick nobody asked for.

[@antivire]

I hope people aren’t harassing him personally, but it’s the internet so they probably are. Hopefully he’ll learn from this and comeback with a much better model.

[@LarryLenau]

A team of designers reviewed, approved, and released this set to the LEGO marketing department. You don't have to feel bad for one person; it was a collective failure.

[@antivire]

@@elvewizzy That’s probably true, the legs are a clear indicator of that. I just worry because I hate when people attack others for something they worked on you know.

[@cassandrasibley228]

@@frenchfriedbagel7035 probably not. I'd bet money lego is the one that made that decision. They just had to make do. With that in mind they did a good job. But the concept is fuckin stupid

[@nikolascagefreeeggs307]

Personally so glad about this set and the Foosball table. After so many have-to-have sets (lighthouse, lion castle, galaxy explorer, boutique hotel) I'm so thankful I don't care about this one.

[@toyahailey]

ha that's how I look at it as well. saves me money

[@gordzilla8443]

This man is The Goat to have an expensive LEGO set sent to him for free by LEGO, and for him to give his honest opinion. No sugarcoating here at all!

[@trimilo6204]

ill be completely honest I think being able to fit the buildable figure inside is super cool, that absolutely does not excuse this set looking the way it does. The photoshopped version looked soo good too bad itll never see the light of day as an actual set

[@SC-gh5ii]

I like that even though Tiago worked at Lego, he’s able to give a genuine and honest review. Kudos Tiago.

[@danielwhittaker5184]

Yes I think he did with some sets using a pentagonal tile with his initials if I am not mistaken in sets like the haunted house drop ride/Titanic and maybe ship in a bottle. Hats off to Tiago for just saying it as it is with no strings attached.

[@WizardOfOss]

Very much agree! If they were adamant on that feature, they should have made a slightly smaller version that wouldn't harm the proportions, and included that in the set. But instead we got a deformed set for the sole reason you can spend another €40 on a set and put it somewhere you can''t see it anymore...it just doesn't make sense. As for the shoulder hinges, considering the movement I can somewhat understand the gaps, although should have a look at Gunpla kits te see how they manage to hide those. Since there's no movement whatsoever in the legs, there's just no excuse there for the inaccuracies. This could and should have been much better.

[@13ON3S]

Wow seeing that photo shopped one it’s crazy how better that one looks

[@greatbigphil]

There's an amazing rebuild of this kit on Rebrickable by a guy named Ransom_Fern. It solves all the issues that you brought up and looks so much better. Less like a slab. The proportions are great. And it still fits the smaller Ironman set insode. The name of the rebuild is: MOC - 76210 Iron Man Mark 44 Hulkbuster - Alternate Build I'm working on is now. It's so satisfying.

[@steve_1313]

Yea I built mine with Ferns instructions. Looks so much better

[@steve_1313]

I built mine with Ransom Ferns alternative instructions. It looks absolutely fantastic.

[@sublimechimp]

4:51 THANK YOU for showing this ! Those upper arms/ shoulders and shins/ ankles are inexcusable

[@DahRidlah]

So basically you need to spend additionally 100$ in Parts to MOC it

[@joevictor53]

I thought it was bad when I bought the 2018 one and felt like I had to buy extra pieces to MOC it to make it look good. That was made as a collector's item at the time. Ended up selling it because it would just be too much effort. This is even worse. The set should've been smaller and cheaper but if you are charging $500, it should be perfect

[@Reggaetonaldo]

Lego should promote the lego designer of this set, to the dots line, exclusively for now on.

[@BeerBourbonandGames]

I'm so thankful for channels like yours. This set is horribly overpriced. All of your points are 100% on point.

[@philmorton4590]

I agree, the ankles, shoulders and belt look terrible, disappointing given the price tag, alot of people probably don't have the smaller ironman to put in it in the first place. Seriously more compact with just the minifig inside would have been fine for me, it's the detail I wanted over the old one. I guess the rebrickable community could fix it, until new plans are available guess I won't be wasting the money.

[@Mr_Waffle.]

Great review. Another giant set for the sake of being giant and being torn between being "realistic" and "being a toy" so much that it's bad at being both. The past half a year of these massive oversized sets being pushed out at a rapid rate has really killed my interest in Lego. Ironically the last Lego set I bought was the Lion Knights castle lol. But at least that was SPECIAL celebrating Lego history, and not just big for the sake of being big.

[@dianavespid937]

Take the Megapill they do amazing sets and do not sell plástic at 40,000% just like Warhammer and Lego

[@veryblocky]

Thanks for the honest review. I agree with you, this set just has too many issues for the price they’re selling it at.

[@danielwhittaker5184]

Its like lego selling a can of worms and they let the potential customer deal with it.

[@pessimisticprofessorfarnsw3241]

I don't know why they compromised to fit the entire other figure when you could have a good looking model that could do the same thing if you just took the iron man legs off.

[@jonathanhowson6420]

I would love to see a video where you build this model how it should have been done in order to address the issues raised here.

[@plumdowner1941]

The gimmick with the other figure fitting inside is a great idea, but executed at the expense of the hulkbuster itself. All you'd need is a slight redesign so the smaller figure folds in a little to fit better.

[@to_ru_kw]

Did you check out the alternate build made by a fan?? It was such a huge improvement over the official set and you can build it with the existing pieces!

[@ShortRound42]

Looking at the side by side, even though they had to lengthen the torso to fit the Iron Man figure, do you think Tiago that just raising the helmet up and angling it slightly downward could really help the look of the model. That looks like it could be an easy mod. And like you said, I wonder why since the legs don't bend, why they couldn't thicken the calf area to match more of the source material?

[@Marc-qp4br]

Thanks for the honest review. I've seen another review where bits were falling off it as soon as you touched them. Have you experienced the same?

[@ShortRound42]

We appreciate your reviews always Tiago!

[@panmaew]

After the excellent Mighty Bowser which is much smaller and cheaper, yet doesn't compromise much on the playability, this one does really fall flat. Thank you Tiago. You have explained it best.

[@ShortRound42]

I wonder if Lego could've done like other premium figures, and just use either the buildable Iron Man head or the torso and then have shortened up the torso?

[@evilbricks4208]

You should review the summer 2022 monkie kid sets.

[@pi172]

this set gets bashed so hard in reviews and reactions to the revealing, I wonder how it will perform in sales. personally not interested in any sort of mech anyway.

[@TiagoCatarino]

Im curious as well. But I’m guessing there will be some promotions to incentivise people buying it or it will be on sale rather quickly

[@patxizabaljauregui2543]

I was seriously considering getting this for my birthday this month but after all these reviews to say that I’m having second thoughts is now an understatement

[@colewernette4601]

i remember getting the exoforce fortress as a kid. one of my fave sets. it has two light bricks included

[@NathanSmith-jl7zm]

Honestly they should've gone with making it a more static model, slightly smaller, and FAR more accurate. Less range of motion on the arms would allow for them to look more accurate, particularly in those bare shoulders.

[@Dragoflare]

I have to agree. I mean, there’s a reason why Ransom Ferns moc is so popular. It literally fixes the majority of the issues with the exact same parts.

[@AdamJasper18]

I don't see how the gold pieces would bump up the price so much. The Infinity Gauntlet had tons and it was still a fair price.

[@ShortRound42]

Any gold elements can raise the price especially if they're gold recolors of elements not usually in gold but it's only one part of it. Add in the light bricks, the glow in the dark tiles, that recolored gold windscreen would cost alot, that new recolored fresnel lens, etc. Not justifying the price but all those things add up. Oh and the printed dome, that definitely cost. Then add in Disney's license, inflation across the board and Lego knowing this is a premium probably tacked on an additional $50 for the collectors that have the disposable income, christmas coming, etc. They all look at their marketing for this. The Infinity Gauntlet they made at a low price to get sales. They looked at cost versus volume of sales and said, keep the price down because we'll make up for it in more sales. Companies do this all the time. Each Lego model has it's own budget and marketing and how they price. It's not a one to one price/piece across the board. That's what we Lego collectors make the mistake of. We think every model has the same budget and marketing put into it. We all forget licensing, advertising for it, etc. All baked into the price.

[@neodym5809]

@@ShortRound42 you forgot the 30% margin. Lego is greedy.

[@ShortRound42]

@@neodym5809 They are a for profit company. Always were. If you use an inflation calculator and compare prices from the past to today, they’re roughly the same. They’ve always been an expensive toy.

[@neodym5809]

@@ShortRound42 Name another company with a 30% profit margin. This is extremely rare and shows Lego could easily reduce prices by 10-20% while still being in the double digit profit regime. The material Lego is made of, even metallic pieces, are dirt cheap. License fees are a bit more expensive, but not the reason why Lego is expensive. Its profit margin is. I mean, as long as we are stupid enough to pay them, they can go for it. But out of honesty, we should also mention this when we explain why Lego is so expensive: because they print money with it.

[@ShortRound42]

@@neodym5809 Oh, when you say dirt cheap on materials, remember they gotta' pay for and hire the best designers they can, their benefits, all employees from janitor to senior designer, pay for marketing, advertising, amusement parks, licensing, the manufacturing facilities, maintenance on the machines, insurance for all of it, etc., etc. Like I said before, it's all baked into the price. That's how business works. It's not just one thing, it all adds up.

[@stoopidapples1596]

Honestly, the hulkbuster in AoU was already a pretty unpopular suit. So the fact that they managed to make it look considerably worse is an achievement in itself.

[@TheInvisibleCactusYT]

For $550 for only 4000 pieces this set is nowhere near worth it Also it’s not completely movie accurate. Definitely not worth getting in my opinion

[@thehamiltonshow]

This is an ambitious design. Too much in terms of compromises from what could have been an epic standalone set.

[@toddprokipchuk304]

Just started this, but i am using the standard build and not the alternate but that is because of my space to build it, I am enjoying the build so far

[@pedro380085]

I was on a LEGO Store yesterday in Orlando and I realized that lot of folks don't know about the .10 cent ratio per piece. Specially for those new in LEGO, they like they set, they buy it, no matter what is the price.

[@AminalCreacher]

Looks like sets have shipped with multiple light bricks only a handful of times before: Sets 5892 and 11009 each contained a pair of red light bricks. Set 7347 included two "white" light bricks, and set 76405 includes three "white" light bricks. Neat!

[@ReddyDutch]

Hi Tiago, thanks for this honest review! Do you have an update on the review of the castle? I’m really looking forward to that review 😊

[@OliverCGoetz]

Thank you for the review! When I saw the official pictures and pictures of the Hulkbuster from the movie I always thought the people who took the official pictures messed up by pulling up the shoulder pieces to the torso, when they are clearly more downwards to the arms in the original. Now I know why: they are so far away from the upper army that it's not even funny. We all wanted this to be a great set. We wanted to love it! But it’s so underwhelming! I can almost hear the frustration about this in your voice.

[@stawiamklocka138]

Thanks for being honest despite the fact that they sent you this set

[@Drake_4]

I want a hulkbuster the same size as this one but looks and feels way better

[@kubzi282]

2:38 The new Lego Harry Potter Hogwarts Express set has three Lego light bricks as well.

[@leoconto1043]

There was a 120$ minifigure scale ucs hulkbuster which had a ucs info piece and a display stand with extra gun hands for the hulkbuster and robotic arms to hold them. I think that one is the true ucs hulkbuster.

[@UnknowableThen]

You used to work at Lego, and Tiago, they have your information and are coming for you.

[@NIRDIAN1]

The thing that confuses me here is that the gaps seem so entirely uneccesary? Especially the shoulder joint gaps could have been way less obvious with some larger curved items covering that joint without sacrificing range of motion. I'd love to see someone who can afford this set do an upgrade that doesn't get rid of the other figure fitting inside but still fixes a lot of the issues.

[@TheRandompaint]

The Lego Harry Potter UCS train came with 3 light bricks as well!

[@antivire]

Lego needs to normalize fixed models in one pose, especially for sets targeted for adults where playability isn’t a factor most people buy the sets for.

[@j1t176]

Couldn't they have made it so you could just remove a portion of the legs of the iron man set and made it look a little more accurate?

[@thatoneperson5368]

Is it just me that would’ve somewhat preferred a smaller version. Almost like the original Age of Ultron hulk buster, but give it a full display stand like the Star Wars models and all new character prints to make it unique. Obviously remove the £500 price tag but make it a full display that you can have on your shelf and would set up further displays from other movies like Black Panther, Captain America and so on

[@rexyjp1237]

Why didnt they just make red ronin. Red ronin is a samurai like robot in the marvel universe. In its first apearance it was build by a few japanese people and it was controlled by a kid called robin. It stopped godzilla from setting off nuclear weapons when s.h.i.e.l.d pissed him off. The robot also "helped" godzilla in a 2v3 against some alien kaiju (red ronin got taken out directly, godzilla carried the fight) The kid that controlled red ronin also saved the avengers and the fantastic four in the final comic saving them from godzilla. The avengers where at there most powerful in that comic and godzilla went thru many battles and was realy tired and the he still dominated the fight with ease. Red ronin played a big role in the marvel franchise since then so they really should make red ronin.

[@dah9093]

This set is getting a lot of poor reviews, all saying the same thing. It makes me wonder about the product development, research, design and consumer testing for a project like this at Lego. How could they all get it so wrong (maybe they haven't?)TC is probably best placed to answer that.

[@jh6031]

It’s possible the bad reception will slow sales, which could make it highly collectible when it retires.

[@toshie7]

450$ should be enough for this one... 550$ is WAYYY too much! I understand the current problem with inflation and stuff, but LEGO got pretty greedy on us right here, also adding the fact that it lacks essentional details to the reference it's based on, proportions and shapes are off and the cherry on top with tony's most basic legs ever are a complete joke to me, very disappointed.

[@ShortRound42]

It's a great looking mech! It's the price gold pieces, the recolors, the recolor on the new fresnel lens, the 3 light bricks, the glow in the dark round tiles, the printed dome, especially the recolored gold windscreen, and for the licensing and inflation. That ALL adds up folks. Jeez. Get a clue. Definitely will be an awesome display piece and the build-able figure fits within. Every reviewer doesn't seem to appreciate what the Lego designers have done here.

[@Peter_McNutt]

The guy that built this should have talked to the guy who built the mighty bowser. Seems to me the large Nintendo sets are some of the better sets at reducing technical issues like this hulk buster has.

[@Kenvedsson]

after seeing this video, you really gonna appreciate the work the designer did on the Voltron o.O

[@Gecko_builds]

While it is really cool that you can fit something inside, there is no need. After all the price tag, description and selling point of this is a display model for adults or fans, I wonder how different it would be without this gimmick. Not to say they didn’t do a good job with the overall design but that price and the light bricks are a nice little inclusion! Wow that’s tough for anyone to justify. Once again good review Tiago, covered everything others would skip!

[@scareahhhh]

In Australia this is $850, which is insane 🤯 For comparison the Titanic is $999 I was so excited for this and am left disappointed!

[@Thomas-u8q]

Wow. Titanic best modular lego set ever

[@ihaveseenthings0]

The only good thing about this set is that the designers now have an example of what NOT to do when building a larger scaled mech

[@CrixBrix]

Great review

[@commandercodyscreations6000]

Tiago, your videos are always so refreshing to watch. I love your set reviews!

[@themotionbrickness]

I think the very audible sigh sums this set up perfectly: huge potential, but too many gaps and compromises that stop it from being worthy of the UCS title and the price tag. Great video! 👍

[@noksuan59]

I don't mind the gaps, the problem is the body proportions are nasty, the limbs are passable but the core torso and head just ruins it

[@cassandrasibley228]

Imo the body should be 2ish studs narrower and the legs probably 2 wider each. That'd help the proportions. They designed it like a toy and not like a real suit of armor that big designed to stop the hulk. It needs to be hella bottom heavy

[@Mountain_Man]

I was super excited for this set till I seen the actual set. What a colossal let down

[@carlosrodrigomejiagarcia8005]

Idk about yours, but the one we have at the store is extremely flimsy and the pieces in the torso and the waist fall off very easily and are super hard to put back on ☹️

[@benjaminjackson8663]

I'm not a Hulkbuster buff, but could the gaps in the design be somewhat intentional? With such a large mech you could feasibly see some of the inner workings as it's moving around and adjusting different plates or coverings. It can be kind of neat to be able to see some of the mechanisms holding it together. This isn't to deny that some gaps look like pretty egregious design flaws of course.

[@TheMasterChiefArchives]

I was considering either this or the Bowser, now I know

[@cricketben6742]

Especially because there already has been this exact hulkbuster as an ucs style model (yes, it was a bit smaller but much better looking) i really dont understand the release of this set. I guess itll be worth for lego if just a few marvel fans will purchase it, so they didnt really care about making a perfect, polished set, which is really sad to see

[@wendymail7876]

The price is insane!

[@kekchanbiggestfan]

I love how he says Ulk Basterd

[@jonathanblote]

it is not the first time lego put more than 1 lightbrick in a set, though i can only think of one other set that has 2 lightbricks. lego creator set 5892 only reason i know this is because i am currently searching thru all my bricks to find all the parts needed to reconstruct it. anyway i really enjoy listening to your videos when building so thanks for that man :)

[@Ihaveabottle]

Love the set hate the price tag

[@JaoGamerYT]

This would be a great parts pack at 70% off

[@narinsukwatthanakorn2852]

MOC from Ransom Fern look way better than official build.

[@OzzieBoii18]

So true!

[@Ansem458]

When looking at the screen model the chest is really my only complaint here, the pec panels seem to be too long thus putting the arc reactor farther from the helmet

[@boiledegg427]

The thumbnail says it all

[@Res375]

Since you worked for Lego, does Lego get mad at you when your reviews are not positive? Thanks for your honesty.

[@SaysDom]

I would have paid 550 for a proper hulkbuster and been happy to do so. I own so many marvel lego sets- I'm the target audience and I flat out grimaced when I saw it built for the first time.

[@minifigure-kragle]

Lego: only the best is good enough Me: is this the best you can do?

[@stairmasternem]

The gaps are bad. Mech builders will probably have fun modding this. A while ago someone made a Hulkbuster with the intent of scaling with the Hulk fig better. I think I want to build that instead for like $20 of ordered parts

[@420pablo69]

I am gonna get it and heavily mod the legs, chest sides and top arms so it looks good

[@ariesnugroho235]

this is very cool bro

[@duck609]

I mean the price tag which I got it for was $800 (off lego) which is very very expensive, but I personally think it’s cool as it’s a set that uses another set and it’s my first big lego set which makes me happier. I reckon that there could be more changes yes! But for the size of the model and making it quite mobile is a bit difficult to make into a basically spot on hulk buster lego model. But yes I do agree with you.

[@creativespace8637]

It’s interesting how LEGO sends sets like this to this guy sets even though they’ve gotta know he’s gonna roast some of em

[@Quentino808]

From a far, on video it looks nice. The only thing I really can't stop getting bothered by is the arc reactor placement/chest. It should be higher and makes the body's proportions look weird. Was really hoping to like it but for $700 CAD...plus taxes....noooooo way, I'll buy the old one one eBay 😂

[@Creativo3Dimpresiones]

Tenía bajas esperanzas en este modelo y su costo me desanimaba aún más....ahora al ver este genial video me convenci de no comprárselo a mi pareja...mejor otra cosa. Gracias.

[@gieselats]

Please show us this model in five years. It would be interesting to see how the darkred pieces last. Do they get brittle in some years. How many parts can you replace after five years… is there still a warranty, if the pieces fall of the model. And what about the many darkred pieces on the titanic… ok. Just my consideration. Keep up the good work. No one mentioned the quality issues…

[@thatgreenfur6584]

They should have outsourced the design for this to bandai, got one of their Perfect Grade Gundam people on it. I guarantee you it would have been flawless.