M1978 Koksan and M1989 | 170mm self-propelled guns of North Korea

[@WeaponDetective]

Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Detective videos kzbin.info/aero/PLEMWqyRZP_LrdqB-XbqY2LocUVEaG_w7D Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Detective-Land videos kzbin.info/aero/PLEMWqyRZP_LpFkS9hH3KD9uTEKBDVQZRp

[@tasman006]

They would be useless in a NBC, chemical environment and the crew is not well protected agianst counter battery fire. Range of the gun would be good I'd say but it looks very similar to the Russian 2S7 Pion SPG.

[@siamaktahaeiyaghoubi897]

As far as I have heard from the military people, the most important aspect of a weapon is its' functionality. If the weapon works and is reliable, it can be useful for some scenarios. So, these two artillery pieces may help North Koreans if necessary.

[@dadrising6464]

And a shell will always be cheaper than a missile..

[@timbrwolf1121]

The gun does not need a fume extractor. They are only meant for enclosed turrets to mitigate gases from entering the turret during reloading.

[@TheCrapOnYourStrapOn]

They’re hooked up to the toilet too

[@murasame5071]

koksan my be old , but it definetly NOT obsolete. South Korean Military is right to dread these.

[@mrmakhno3030]

Nowaday North Korea have tons of alternative solution for Koksan. They have 600 mm KN 25 IRBM and 300 mm MLRS. In the operational fire support mission they have 155 mm SPG which seems like a direct copy from Chinese one. So Koksan will soon end its service to be replaced by a new generation of North Korean artillery system.

[@tarekmalaeb8229]

Very informative, can you do a video concerning the Iraqi made howitzer that countered the M-1978

[@ifanramadhana7833]

I assume that would be Al-Faw, the 210 mm SPG project. Little is known beside that it was designed by Gerard Bull company, so it could have been enlarged GHN-45 in a chassis that copied G6 Rhino.

[@mohammedsaysrashid3587]

Another wonderful video was shared by an excellent (🙏 weapon detective) channel .video about North Korean M 1978 Korean & M1989 self-propelled guns. Video clearly explained all characteristics of these long-range self-propelled guns and their historical backgrounds.thank you for sharing

[@Shashank-g6i]

Make a video on astra a2a missile astra mk1 ,astra mk2 dual pulse missile and also astra mk3 which has meteor like ramjet propulsion with 350km range recently there were successful ground tests of astra mk3

[@habahan4257]

Another high-quality video. Thanks.

[@cwf_media9200]

see you there

[@1KosovoJeSrbija1]

a modern 170mm SPG, with modern ammunition and an autoloader would be a counter battery menace, able to outrange anything

[@tickysiasiluka68]

Only ignorant people can say these weapons are obsolete.You just have to know when and where to use them.

[@wiktorberski9272]

Really strange weapon. Initially, I thought, that it was a distant cousin of the soviet 2S5 Giatsint. But I was wrong. Thank for this movie

[@Panzergruppe22]

the name Juche-po is likely referred to their Juche ideology it possibly means Juche Cannon, Juche Artillery, or something like that, not the 'main gun'

[@박희수-t8d]

북한의 최신형 M2018에 대한 소식은 없네, 이건 사진 분석으로 152mm이거나 155mm로 추정하긴 하는데 러시아와 공통성을 갖기 위해 152mm로 생각한다는 정도에 M1978이나 M1989보다 사거리가 짧다고 본답니다 대략 40km 정도. 그리고 170mm대포인 M1978과 M1989의 포탄 중량이 20~kg 정도로 나포표준 155mm의 절반 정도 105mm와 비슷한 중량이라 비행거리만 늘어났을 뿐 포격정밀성은 포기한 것으로 간주하고 있습니다. 그저 서울에 민간인을 가리지 않고 쏠 수 있다는 공포 유발용이지 않을까요?! 이 영상에서 알려주신대로의 대량 방사포들이 실질적인 위협으로 간주되고 있습니다.

[@ALPHA.141]

Make a vedio about Chinese ZBD-04A

[@lukejohnston4666]

Sino BMP3 (in weaponry)

[@bremnersghost948]

Regarding the Soviets providing NK with German 170mm Guns that is accurate, Soviets also provided a lot of captured German equipment to the CCP in the late 40s & early 50s.

[@DespothLord]

It looks like bigger version of russian s-51 artilery

[@kimyseock]

Juche, 주체 is not just meaning ‘main’. it is word comes from DPRK’s ideology name. 주체사상, Juchesasang.

[@barriewright2857]

It might be old. If it ain't broken don't fix it.

[@k.kavala]

arada sırada açıp fotograflarına bakarım. hatta daha dün baktım.

[@ArizonaAstraLLC]

Me too

[@vegaviscount3630]

Is there a model kit of the 1989, 170mm ?. Who sells?

[@HeavenlyMandate]

Wargame red dragon players, assemble

[@rock_ok]

look at the war in Ukraine and syria today it is fought by artillery battles and helis and coldwar migs and drones. meaning that ballistic missiles can be intercepted by antimissile batteries. heavy artillery is not historical.

[@misterbig9025]

5:00 Who were inside the Mercedes Benz?

[@alexanderp8037]

North korea best korea 🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵👍💪

[@ThePeterMann]

Artillery is artillery. See ukraine

[@Alex-no1rb]

i would doubt their "uselessness". For example, ukrainian 2S7 Pions was one of the crucial weapon to win battle at Kyiv

[@Neyreyan]

what kiev battle? the one where that 50 km convoy sat outside kiev for a week and then left?

[@Alex-no1rb]

@@Neyreyan they literally try to capture city: many helicopter landings (famous one in Hostomel), spetznaz incursions (even inside the capital), many cities was occupied+fight on the left bank part of region. You could just read some ukrainians recollections about it, if u know either ukrainian or russian

[@Neyreyan]

@@Alex-no1rb depends on point of view, everyone knew they couldn't capture Kiev with 40.000 soldiers or how much they had there then. They forced peace negotiations and almost got a peace treaty if foreign powers didnt intervene. No army on this planet can take over capital cities in a modern warfare situation. Anyway, the Pions is a very good a artilery piece that still has many uses, the ukranians used them so much until one of them just exploded from poor maintenance

[@Alex-no1rb]

@@Neyreyan well, they could capture it,because theyve outnumbered ukrainians. No, negotiations wouldnt work because nobody would guarantee ukrainian neutrality, as it was with Budapest memorandum and our neutrality status in 1991-2019. And you just cant trust russians, because they genocidical nation which nobody could trust No, Ukraine lost more than one Pion due to barrel malfunction

[@ДокторЯдо]

Thing is, it's very apparent that the entire battle plan was to move troops close to Ukraine's capital and therefore scare Ukraine's government into signing any papers Russia handles over. Russian task force was objectively insufficient for taking Kiev, and poorly managed too.

[@JD-tn5lz]

Slow to move. Slow to emplace. Slow to fire. Slow to relocate. Pretty much meant as a one-shot pony or fixed-emplacement howitzer. One problem with fixed.emplacements is that not only are they easy to find, you don't have to actually destroy them to make them useless. Essentially, these aren't anything to sneeze at, but they are 1980's tech (at best) designed to fight WW2.

[@guitarazn90210]

If NK acquires layered air defense systems from Russia or China, they'll be fighting a WW2-esque battle like in Ukraine.

[@Ade-mu4zn]

🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩

[@Ade-mu4zn]

🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩

[@saudagartebu8846]

Mantap semangat sukses mampir 👍

[@ProfessorBidoof]

0:32 Where's the 180mm? xd

[@minhmeo9506]

South Korea's technological advantage in the field of artillery has begun to appear weaker based on recent developments. NK recently released a new SPG model in 155mm caliber, it is said to be based on an Iranian design and can be considered their answer to K9 Thunder. And certainly North Korea's rocket artillery technology is proving better than its opponents in the South, at least for the next few years.

[@ELYELYELroy]

South Korea has vastly superior rocket artillery and tube artillery. They are capable of producing and using guided rounds and rocket assisted rounds, combat management systems, counterbattery radar, autoloading systems and fire control systems.

[@ifanramadhana7833]

Like many North Korean projects, little is known about it, even if it's based on Iranian Raad, the SPG itself was based on an old M109. There is little evidence if North Korean can produce it in meaningful number. Beside if it's indeed the case that it was based on Raad, it's hardly modern compared to K9 Thunder with their digital FCS.

[@Shashank-g6i]

Dude I don't think so the k9 thunder is way better than nkorean A.gun

[@commie5211]

@@ifanramadhana7833 It kinda does not matter what North Korea has, North Korea has a security treaty with China. If anything happen. PLA is going to be there in the Next day. China does not equip north Korea because they don't want North Korea even think about starting a war like in 1950.

[@Ianmundo]

If the South Koreans are half as clever as I suspect they are, they will have paid close attention to the tactics that have been effective in the War in Ukraine. Armed FPV drones, Surveillance + GMLRS have attritted Russian artillery and we can be quite confident N.Korea is no better

[@박희수-t8d]

글쎄요, 당신이 주장하는 영역에 대한 연구개발을 한국은 이미 상당히 오래 실행해 왔습니다, 하지만 대부분의 군사전문가들이 다루질 않죠. 안티드론 능력에 대해서도 물론 일부 장군들에 의해 간과되었지만 이스라엘의 시스템을 적용할 것을 고려도 해보았지만 한국 지형에선 쓸모없음을 알고 개발하고 있죠. 이동형 안티드론 장비는 이미 시험을 끝내고 양산판정을 기다리는 것이 있고 여러 영역의 드론에 대한 연구는 별로 알려지지 않았지만 미국제 드론의 운용상 불편함에 비슷한 성능의 고고도용와 중고도용 대형드론이 개발 중이고 탑재해야하는 각종 관측장비들은 이미 보유하고 있습니다. GMLRS는 폴란드에 이미 300km급 유도투사체 생산을 위한 기술지원을 하는 나라가 한국이라는 것을 상기시켜 드립니다, 드론이 많이 사용되진 않지만 각 상황에 맞게 개발되고 있고 이미 만들어진 안티드론 체계가 가장 많은 국가중 하나라는 것도요. 북한만 비밀의 국가가 아니라 한국도 군사기술에 대해서는 많은 부분이 비밀로 가려놓은 국가라서 한국인이 아닌 타국의 군사전문가가 더 높은 수준의 자료를 갖고 있는 경우도 있지만 그런만큼 한국민과 타국 군사전문가도 접해보지 못한 군사기술을이 감춰져 있다는 걸 감안해 주세요.

[@ДокторЯдо]

You know, North Koreans are taking notes too

[@fernandoferreira-do8vh]

aguante norcorea

[@bremnersghost948]

Vertically challenged Dictators using Big Guns as Penis Extensions again, In reality Koksan is another example of Ye Olde Cold War Junk that is outranged by SK 155mm with modern Ammo types that the Koksans hiding in Bunkers won't save them from.