This video is a short version of the previous videos. If you want to see the long version, please refer to this link. Making full hull display model - kzbin.info/www/bejne/mGeQg6KadqmZrdk Making sea base - kzbin.info/www/bejne/qWOvoauiiNh7otk
@andreferro46183 жыл бұрын
That's an amazing work of art! Both the ship and the ocean water. Deep respect for your work! Greetings from Brazil.
@user-lw7om1sg1m3 жыл бұрын
Very impressive modelling, I also like that you noted the lower hull was not painted red oxide as commonly thought but the correct anti fowling grey Fantastic!
@JAFKARNAT3 жыл бұрын
Superb workmanship, as always. Must get myself HMS Hood beautiful ship.
@johnsonzhang94073 жыл бұрын
flyhawk‘s kits always great
@adayhr3 жыл бұрын
What a master piece..... Absolute amazing.....
@Martix-sp3xe3 жыл бұрын
Hello 🙂, good job!! 👏👍 If I'm not mistaken, HMS Hood was sunk by the German battleship Bismarck
@studioblueocean3 жыл бұрын
Yes She sank the hood.
@basfinnis3 жыл бұрын
It looks so realistic. Amazing work 😉
@christophersnyder15323 жыл бұрын
This past Wednesday, I got Academy's 1/350 Oliver Hazard Perry class frigate, which I will be building it as, USS Rodney M. Davis FFG-60, if I can get another one later, I will build that as the USS Halyburton FFG-40, which was one of the ships that also assisted in the rescue of Captain Richard Phillips. Take care, and all the best.
@alexlupsor54843 жыл бұрын
Good evening I’m flattered that you agree that there must be an opposite reaction from the ship’s forward motion causing a higher bow wave at the knifes edge and yet when I observed the forward motion of the ships traversing the Welland Canal here inSt. Catherine’s Ontario, the ships forward motion at around 5 knots, creates a wave generated at the bow between 2 - 9 ft high. Now in principle this should not only happen at high speed runs. They should push a mass of rolling water that forces quite a lot of foaming water. I believe I have a theory as to why some large battleships have Avery small mound of foaming water. I watched a program that had the HMS Hood as its subject and was able to watch a coloured film of Hood passing by a point and it was said she was travelling around 10 it’s. I believe that the shape of the bow was such that the signe wave of water met thé opposing sign wave of the sea was intercepted at knife edge of the bow cancelled it almost entirely out as there was evidence of a tiny tumbling motion in front of the edge. I also watched the stern or the wake under high revolutions and observed that with four screws, turning at high revolutions, there was four streams of boiling wake the height to the stern causing a very wet poop deck. I conclude that you are an artist who saw in real time the mastery of the wakes at different revolutions and are accurate when looking at 2 screws in high revolutions, but not four. It is possible that the ship you were fathoming had two rudders. The conclusion that I’ve come to is the pattern of two screws would becloser together. As there still will be a 35* angle to the wake of the screws to which the innermost wakes would intercept at the centre of the stern leaving a large and high stern wake as the ship moves away. On the hand if there’s four screws the wakes would duplicate on the outer screws that would leave four different boiling wakes that would be amplified when the wakes hit the hull and cause foaming effect while at the same time the rudder would amplifié the water mass as it is thrown from under the hull causing a continuous foaming wake as high and as wide as the stern sheets and thus you would a massive wake the width of the propeller shafts. Other then that I have nothing. Summary: The effect of the bow wave would be split by the bow without a mass of water pushing in a raising action as the two sine waves a-pose each other at the center line and cancel out the opposing wave motion. As for the wake, the width will be effected by whether the ship is equipped with two rudders and two or more screws. That’s all I got. And you keep modelling and I will keep praying that God continues to grant you more wisdom and techniques. For ever in His service. Alex
@billbill4168 Жыл бұрын
Brand & number of paint you used for the hull and superstructure?
@finnsam26853 жыл бұрын
A masterpiece indeed! ❤️❤️
@sbf1093 жыл бұрын
그저 항상 대단한 작품 잘 보고 갑니다..! 멋지십니다..!
@krazewraith92253 жыл бұрын
물결표현이 진짜 ㅎㄷㄷ 최고네요.
@phongtran-jh5ru3 жыл бұрын
where do we buy this ship ?
@angeloperini75243 жыл бұрын
Hy,sorry can you let me know wich kind of material you use to make the sea base? I have try with clay but is not so good.
@GuentherVanRaven3 жыл бұрын
Pls make a Diorama of the Wreck of the Bismarck on the ocean floor or one of its sinking🙏🏻.
@dynd3 жыл бұрын
Your tape masking skills seem to be incredible. How do you make a mask that laser accurate like at 2:00?
@yorktown42203 жыл бұрын
That is masking sheet inuded in the kit
@BananaSquare3 жыл бұрын
May I ask what glue did u use for the PE? I can't see any glue?
@smokejaguarsix77573 жыл бұрын
Save yourself the trouble. Just slather a beveled wooden trophy base with some wood filler and form waves. Paint them blue with some white on the wave crests then add a black oil slick. All done.
@MrCenturion19793 жыл бұрын
Fabulous! Bravo!
@이해성-z5b2 жыл бұрын
작품 잘봤습니다 ! 질문한가지 드립니다 물표현 할때 사용하신 갈색 점토같은건 어떤제품인가요 ? 경화제를 섞어사용하는 제품인가요 ?
@ModeliteDiorama3 жыл бұрын
Great!!
@juanbautistagarciaroman55703 жыл бұрын
Excelent 👌🏼
@sam_the_dachsund_47_853 жыл бұрын
Can you please add smoke to the funnels?
@vincentyek59293 жыл бұрын
Salute!
@jlwon12903 жыл бұрын
이번에 시바툴을 이용한 방법으로 시도해봤지만 역시 파형이 어렵네요 항상 보고 잘배워봅니다!
@ukblood13373 жыл бұрын
The Bismarck sank HMS Hood and sealed her own fate with it, Bismarck was pursued by a British armada looking for one thing : revenge.
@Alanhos7705 ай бұрын
Nice
@JungDam_03 жыл бұрын
갑판 구조 도색용 마스킹은 만들어서 하셧나요? 만드신거라면 요령이 궁금하네요...
@studioblueocean3 жыл бұрын
ipp 재단용 커팅매트가 있어서 거기에 테이프붙이고 잘랐습니다. 아마 이 배만드는 영상 긴버전에 제품사용하는게 나와있을겁니다.
@JungDam_03 жыл бұрын
@@studioblueocean 아.. 제이야긴 재단요.. 커팅이 아니고요... ㅎㅎ 구조물에 딱맞게 위치맞춰... 크기 맞춰... 각도 맞춰... 재단이 여간 쉽지 않ㄴ0요...
@studioblueocean3 жыл бұрын
@@JungDam_0 아 그건 제품이 따로있습니다. 손으론 절대못하죠 ...^^
@JungDam_03 жыл бұрын
@@studioblueocean 무슨제품인가요?^^
@JungDam_03 жыл бұрын
@@studioblueocean 목갑판처럼 마스킹제푼이 따로있는건가요? 재단 가이드 같은 제품이 있는건가욤??
@Praxics08153 жыл бұрын
Nice you actually modelled what doomed her against Bismarck. The wave pattern she created when going fast is what lead to her destruction: The swell that dissipates from the after of the ship actually tended to reveal her bottom. It is cited that Hood tented to reveal her "red" when going fast. The main armour belt tends to to stop some distance below the waterline, this is due to shells losing a lot of energy quickly when entering water by the time they reach the hull they usually do not have the energy to cause much damage. However since Hood was going fast to catch up to Bismarck the swell revealed her bottom, just bellow the armour belt and this is where Bismarck hit her. The shell easily penetrated and ultimately hit the magazine and it was all over for her. The idea that Bismarck penetrated the weak deck armour just doesn't hold up. The distance of the hit combined with Bismarcks gun elevation and rather flat projectile trajectory makes it nearly impossible for her to hit the magazine by going thru the deck armour. The decision to go close quarter quickly in order to hide the weak deck armour was her undoing...