Marti Wins Nuisance Money

Marti Blagborough is offering to help other auditors with their legal matters. But is he as astute about the law as he thinks he is?
Footage copyright of Alfie Audits, Marti Blagborough, the London Security Institute and AVH Interventions, used here under fair dealing.
Alfie Audits’ footage (“Job Centre Plus Folkestone”):
• Job Centre Plus Folkes...
Alfie Audits KZbin Channel:
/ @alfieaudits
Marti Blagborough’s footage (“I Sued G4S Security for £££ on Behalf of ‎@alfieaudits”):
• I Sued G4S Security fo...
Marti Blagborough Audits KZbin Channel:
/ @martiblagborough
Iain Gould’s blog (“How False Imprisonment Claims Can Be Made Against Private Security Companies”):
iaingould.co.uk/2014/01/27/ho...
£35,000 damages for man who needed nose surgery after being punched and kicked by pub security guard:
www.hudgellsolicitors.co.uk/c...
Abdulrazak Ali v Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust and G4S Secure Solutions UK Ltd [2018] EWHC 591 (Ch):
vlex.co.uk/vid/abdulrazak-ali...
Barclays Bank Plc. v Various Claimants [2018] EWCA Civ 1670:
www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/...
Barclays Bank Plc. v Various Claimants [2020] UKSC 13:
www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/...
Coco v A.N. Clark (Engineers) Limited [1968] F.S.R. 415:
www.ip4all.co.uk/wp-content/u...
Section 47 of the Offences Against The Person Act 1861:
www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/...
Article 8 of Schedule 1 to the Human Rights Act 1998:
www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/...
Article 10 of Schedule 1 to the Human Rights Act 1998:
www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/...
Section 12 of the Legal Services Act 2007:
www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/...
Section 14 of the Legal Services Act 2007:
www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/...
Training videos from the London Security Institute:
-WHEN TO USE PHYSICAL INTERVENTION IN THE PRIVATE SECURITY INDUSTRY SIA TRAINING:
• WHEN TO USE PHYSICAL I...
-PHYSICAL INTERVENTION TECHNIQUES SIA TRAINING:
• PHYSICAL INTERVENTION ...
-USE OF PHYSICAL INTERVENTION SKILLS IN THE PRIVATE SECURITY INDUSTRY:
• USE OF PHYSICAL INTERV...
-USE OF PHYSICAL INTERVENTION SKILLS IN THE PRIVATE SECURITY INDUSTRY SIA TRAINING UK:
• USE OF PHYSICAL INTERV...
London Security Institute KZbin Channel:
/ @londonsecurityinstitute
Training videos from AVH Interventions:
-Escort hold and arm wrap:
• Escort hold and arm wrap
-Front and rear arm wrap:
• Front and rear arm wrap
AVH Interventions KZbin Channel:
/ @avhinterventions6093
Channel Theme:
Music:- ASHUTOSH - Utopia
Watch:- • ASHUTOSH - Utopia
www.ashutoshmusic.com/music

[@MatthewBaker-nq2cb]

Marty is a legend. Sorry I meant BELLEND.

[@streetvideoreviewer]

Let's be charitable and say he's an enthusiast in the field of campanology.

[@MatthewBaker-nq2cb]

@@streetvideoreviewer 😂

[@oakie007]

Blagborough is such a knob.

[@kenbradley5032]

He’s just trying to find another revenue source to prop up his failing KZbin venture. Hopefully he will overstep his in depth understanding of the legal system and land himself in court. He recently did a couple of videos with the other idiot dj audits , which really just shows how desperate he must be. He is not a very nice person at all and I certainly don’t want this type sticking up for my rights please. What are we breeding in this country.

[@davidgavin7280]

For those that don't know the full S.P. Alfie is a half wit with form for bothering that job centre although he never has the intent of getting help finding gainful employment. He even went back again after this event but didn't even get inside the door.

[@karlc9773]

Letters, he can't even talk correctly, let alone write

[@liamgibbons3255]

Marti Blagborough you’ve got 5 kids to your sister…. How you going to try belittle anyone 😂 not to mention the stench that resonates from your skin 🤢🤮

[@liamgibbons3255]

Marti Blagborough you’ve got 5 kids to your sister…. How you going to try belittle anyone 😂 not to mention the stench that resonates from your skin 🤢🤮

[@liamgibbons3255]

Does marti live in a crack den why does his flat look run down?

[@ToxtethOGrady]

Love this! These plastic auditors need exposing..they wouldn't even exist if it wasn't for KZbin.. Do these fools think they'd do it if it wasn't for views then make a possible income from it? And don't even get me started on that loud mouth 'sausage' Marty! What an absolute 🔔 end he is! Great channel mate.. newly subbed,liked and Bell dinged ready for the next one 😂

[@boab69y2k]

Its quite nice seeing Auditors being called out foe their bullshit - Everyone should be held accountable for their actions

[@whitemonkey7932]

Oh old stinky didn't go through with his bar exams....or perhaps he thought being a rowdy chav at the pub counted as his bar exams.😅

[@davidupton3175]

Another interesting and informative vlog . What comes to mind at the end of it is ,as he says, he's not trained in the law, he's not a barrister, solicitor, just a danger to himself and his followers.

[@mdmoore100]

I still think it’s wrong on principle to pay out even nuisance money. It undermines your staff who did nothing wrong. Would be interesting to see what G4S’s staff unions think of that policy? Appreciate it’s a commercial decision but what about looking after your staff and spending a few quid standing up for them in court? Knowing of course it will never get to court because Blagborough et al. wouldn’t risk losing and paying costs.

[@frazerdog]

There's no end to the skills of Marti is there, he has now discovered a new niche in the Auditors market. The corridors of Lincolns Inn are abound with muttterings of " have you heard of Crafty Marti " this time next year he'll be a member of the bench. Good grief what a dipstick !

[@streetvideoreviewer]

"My Lords and my Lady, may I refer you to the precedent established in the case of Alfie Audits v. Greedy Bastards, Inc., in which the claimant was represented most perspicaciously by my learned friend, Mr Blagborough...."

[@exsubmariner]

The soap dodging grifter probably thinks temple bar is a pub in Athens

[@exsubmariner]

@@streetvideoreviewer I think Marty would look good wearing a Poundland wig and gown stockings and suspenders

[@streetvideoreviewer]

@@exsubmariner This could be Marti's sartorial trade mark, his answer to DJ Audits' 'green trackie bottoms' and Auditing Yorkshire's swish glasses. Upping the ante in the fashion stakes.

[@BobGnarley.]

Is this that guy who is always getting destroyed in his comments section? lol he cant handle any criticism so tells all his viewers to do one 🤣

[@biropen8635]

Hope they declare the money to the HMRC

[@Dibley8899]

I'm surprised G4S coughed up the money. No offences had been committed by G4S, and they ejected someone who was a PUBLIC NUISANCE and clearly a trespasser, having been told to leave using minimum force. Damage caused to the camera was not through intent but due to the nuisance of attempting to push through the officers, making bodily contact to re-enter the building. In doing so, the officer caused a legitimate action by pushing the nuisance backwards in self-defence. A stance carried out by police officers in the land on every similar occasion. In the case of the nuisance attempting to re-enter the premises and making bodily contact with the officers. NO ONE has the right, unless in self-defence, to touch another without permission, and therefore, a matter of common assault occurs, and the trespass becomes aggravated in this respect. Aggravated trespass is a criminal offence and can attract police involvement and arrest. The nuisance was a lucky man in this respect and had G4S officers insisted on police action, the nuisance could have visited his nearest dedicated custody, locked in a cell, charged, fingerprinted, DNA taken, and bailed to attend a Mag Court with a fine and a criminal record. Amateurs like Marti and Auditors must brush up on their law before having their collars felt. As for Mr. Nuisance alleging bruising. The video clearly shows a light fingered push to move the nuisance back, and unlikely to have caused bruising. In this respect, take care, Mr nuisance, in fear of making a false allegation of assault, either criminally or through civil recourse, might end up with the clunk click on every trip.

[@Auditnator]

IS Marti related to the Whittakers

[@exsubmariner]

Yes I think he is because he's a half wit

[@19Neil67]

I’ve got respect for the Whittakers 👊🏼

[@colinpenfold9890]

When the lecturer talks restraint techniques I believe he is referring to the risk of positional affixation.

[@karlc9773]

That's easily prevented by not putting pressure on the chest

[@tonyb1223]

Basically Marti used one of his many solicitor's letters that he has for the nefarious claims he has done in the past, doctored it so he has the wording and sent it to G4S. This of course, now makes him a legal expert 😂 And the damage to Alfie's top rate £55 camera, another ebay special, it makes you think about where the passion for photography is, if you buy cheap tat all the time.

[@Deekm69]

Refurbished crap I imagine

[@liamgibbons3255]

I thought he bought his gear from temu

[@powernab8457]

Another excellent tutorial with great case law reading! Thankyou Street Video Reviewer 😂😂😉👍

[@user-yz6lb5pt8h]

He's extremely knowledgeable in the legal sector

[@Deekm69]

This "Hi guy's welcome to the channel Blah Blah Blah" get's on my TIT's! He's one of the most boring so called Auditors I've seen

[@danton1982]

Grifters

[@whitemonkey7932]

Aggravated trespass...the fact that force needs to be used his trespass is not simple trespass but aggravated.

[@streetvideoreviewer]

Good point.

[@Ian-xt1mb]

As bright as a Toc H lamp!

[@mdmoore100]

Slightly off topic but I have noticed distinct reduction in s33 CJA nonsense amongst auditors over the last few weeks. I wonder if word has finally been accepted as its intended purpose? (Which is of course nothing to do with access to land).

[@kt5661]

@mdmoore100 Spot on pal. s33 CJA is an extention of 'public place' in the Public Order Act 1936. Like you say auditors love to play this card like some sort of authorisation to trespass. Got zero to do with trespass.

[@mdmoore100]

@@kt5661 the female auditor used to make herself look particularly stupid as she handed out printed sheets of the (irrelevant) Act to security staff as some kind of pass to go wherever she liked. They all seem to have stopped doing it now, but of course won’t acknowledge ever being wrong.

[@glendodds8004]

Extremely lacking in knowledge about hygiene.

[@atlanticx100]

No government building local or national should be regarded as "Private" property as it is owned by the public through taxes etc. Whether there should be restrictions on access etc due to security etc is valid. As for using private for-profit security in government buildings should be banned. I am sure there are more than enough government buildings to make direct employment possible. Third-party private companies are used to avoid worker employment rights as to pensions, sick pay, hourly rates, etc. As regards auditors etc I do not think they should be needed or wanted. I also disagree with the way it is used for entertainment, but used for real journalism and investigation to bring power to account I totally agree.

[@streetvideoreviewer]

As I mentioned in the video, I do think there is an argument that a job centre and similar public facilities such as town halls are a public amenity, and as such, should be accessible by photographers - subject to whatever reasonable conditions security/management wish to enforce in any particular situation. Arguably, this is the legal position already due to the likely effect of Article 10, it just hasn't been decided in a judicial setting in a way that could be applied generally rather than to a specific set of facts.

[@tomalex4806]

Just because people pay tax doesn't mean it's owned by us that do pay tax. Although I see why that is often said

[@atlanticx100]

@@tomalex4806 Who owns it? The King. The government is always saying, that all the money they have is taxpayer's money. Therefore we the people own it. Or at least the leases.

[@tomalex4806]

​​​@@atlanticx100again, we don't legally own public buildings just because we pay tax. End of story. Otherwise we would be allowed to walk in these places anytime and do as we please... We can't. Our names aren't on the deeds. So paying tax doesn't matter as we don't have a say in anything anyway and we never will

[@whitemonkey7932]

Only bruising? Hope Stinky is ready.to.receive a charge of attempting to gain a pecuniary advantage by deception. WRT to the non disclosure...Stinky should be aware that he acts as agent for the claimant and as such is bound by the terms of the agreement.

[@streetvideoreviewer]

@whitemonkey7932 Obtaining pecuniary advantage by deception was an offence under section 16 of the Theft Act 1968. That was repealed and replaced by offences in the Fraud Act 2006. Of most relevance here would be the offences in sections 2 and 3 of the 2006 Act. Although the claim was without merit, personally I don't believe the two of them were actually committing a fraud. I think it can be chalked up as nothing more than a vexatious claim. I agree with the 'agency' argument. In the video, I refer to the fact that although Marti did not sign the settlement itself, he did submit it to G4S electronically as agent for Alfie Audits, therefore he could be said to have undertaken the same obligations himself. That's quite apart from the common law duty of confidence, which I think also applies.

[@youpagan]

£250 is a bargain for G4S compared with the cost of case to court even if G4S win. However G4S have big pockets and may consider to go to court in the future.

[@whitemonkey7932]

250 quid is nothing compared to the damages and legal costs G4S could run up.....og God just how stupid he is....he even admits 195 quid for personal injuries that don't exist.😂

[@liamgibbons3255]

I'm surprised marti isn't claiming for dla and pip for life so he can get a free car and other stuff he doesn't have to pay for

[@whitemonkey7932]

Interestingly a "paralegal" cannot sign on his client's behalf....I have a feeling he can't accept a fee....

[@streetvideoreviewer]

He can. He is within the law in that aspect of this because section 12(1) of the Legal Services Act 2007 states that, in the civil justice arena, 'conducting litigation' and 'exercising rights of audience' are reserved legal activity. Sending a letter before claim is not those things, meaning it's a free market and the client can appoint and pay whomever he wishes for that and other pre-claim tasks. The position would be greyer if in one of these situations Marti ever decides to assist with the claim itself.

[@Alan_Watkin]

I think this first guy is knows zero.... He's basically watched whoever and decided he will have at doing this himself, But with only the knowledge he's gained from watching other's and im not even sure he's taken much of that in very well, lol, i think Marti would be bound by it because he was acting as representative, wouldn't it be a turn of events for G4S to take action against them... i doubt they will but it would be pretty satisfying.

[@karlc9773]

Worzel will be a barrester next week lol

[@davidgavin7280]

He claimed back in 2020 that he'd paid £3k for a foundation course in Law. It was his usual fake screen 🐴💩 because he hasn't ever put up some blag 'pass' certificate.

[@Deekm69]

The BAFBB rather than the real BBB. Black as fuck barrister lol!

[@user-yz6lb5pt8h]

Cheers SVR! 👍

[@liamgibbons3255]

Isnt marti blagborough funny he videos people who pay for his children and post it online and then lies

[@tr606]

You need to be careful of that GPDR 🤦

[@bevsartsandcrafts715]

The blonde security guard seemed to be amping everything up though. Instead of deescalating, she was going for it. Even her body language showed how she was riled up. I’m not a fan of this guy but I did think she was a little unprofessional

[@streetvideoreviewer]

Yes, but they had to remove him. It's easy to make it look like that in the heat of the moment.

[@apollocreed5391]

To be fair, he's being a brat, people are going to the job centre to look for work and appointments, it's not the nicest of places to be, but this buffoon just made it much more of a rubbish experience than ever, with some drip filming for no reason. He is a clown 🤡 and should show some respect to others. Oh and he's wearing a cap, a face mask and a body worn camera as well. I mean come on!!! Lol 😂

[@philipallen-729]

The blonde lady was very impressive. The time for de-escalation was over. The auditor was asked to leave several times and the time for removal was imminent. All three security security ladies handled the removal with limited, if any, hands on.

[@kt5661]

In fairness unlawful and unprofessional are two completely different things and while we can argue all day long about unprofessionalism they have acted completely lawfully throughout.

[@PaulCrackhead]

Please have a look at EA AUDITS and his continuous begging for money

[@Wonky4925]

Good upload. Informative and well structured for non-legal bods.

[@matthew-gn4qd]

in these type of situations it seems a snap decision is often made as to whether the alleged trespasser is in fact trespassing. could a situation arise where an alleged trespasser is in fact within the law and not trespassing? in such a situation, if it were perhaps later proven that no trespass was committed, could the security guards be committing an offence by physically removing the alleged trespasser and thereafter be at risk for damages or some other legal action or claim made against them?

[@streetvideoreviewer]

I think it would depend on whether they were acting under a reasonable belief.

[@armourkiiing4160]

Might help the viewers if he had sub titles on when he talks 😅

[@bassplayer3974]

Have I wondered into an alternative universe, outrageous. Not a leg to stand on judging by footage. Bet they all try it on, only a letter.

[@marypettyfer4640]

Can someone please explain (not referring to this ) Why do the police arrest auditors waste our money because it never ever sticks .They seem to always come out laughing with payouts.Why does it not stick if they are arrested say for reconnaissance if a building if course I were a business and someone masked up acting furtively then flying a drone over my business. Does it go to a jury? Unlike others i know nothing about the legal system.I just hate these constant payouts.

[@apollocreed5391]

They get compensation because the police make unlawful arrests, so technically false imprisonment so a claim for money is paid out, and these claims do not go to court, if so it's very rare.

[@buy.to.let.britain]

this is a man who understands the meaning of personal freedom.

[@bloodyliar]

'....refusing to obey their request....' yeah, you know the Law

[@streetvideoreviewer]

Well that's potentially just clumsy wording in the narration. If they ask him to leave, he does have to leave. He didn't.

[@462904]

AND YOUR POINT IS !

[@PtolemyCeasar]

GDPR is in a state of uncertainty right now, no responsable court would take it on unless it's egregious. Carry on Marti!! . $$$$$$

[@Jett_geyhound]

So many errors made by you. Your commentary is flawed.

[@streetvideoreviewer]

What specific errors have I made? Please list them.

[@andytownsend8447]

Does anyone know if it was reported to G4S regards the breach of confidential ? Hopefully it has and the money paid out will be claimed back

[@davidgavin7280]

It's not worth the time to try and claw back the money. They only paid any because it was a far cheaper way for them to get rid of the nuisance. It would have cost them far more to make sure that they didn't pay these idiots a penny. It's a shame in one sense that someone high up at G4S didn't just decide to dig their heels in and told Barrister Worzil to feck off but that's the way of the corporate World

[@mdmoore100]

@@davidgavin7280they should never pay out, sends the wrong message to the staff when they haven’t done anything wrong, gives really bad publicity as the auditors broadcast it everywhere as a victory, even though they are too stupid to understand that a payment can be made without liability. How would you feel as a security guard if every time you lawfully ejected someone the firm paid out? Really poor, they need to tell them to go away and defend any claim that comes in, even if it costs more, stop setting the precedent that auditors can get paid for causing trouble.

[@sparky4530]

Yes it was, G4 were contacted. Have not seen an update but will contact the person involved try and get update.

[@streetvideoreviewer]

@andytownsend8447 G4S wouldn't bother trying to claw the money back. The whole point of paying it in the first place was to be rid of them. However, I do think it's likely - especially if the DWP find out about it - that they will insist that KZbin take both Marti's and Alfie's videos down due to the breach of the settlement agreement.

[@kindcitizen-oe5ck]

@@streetvideoreviewer Does someone have a copy of the video? If its taken down it cant be used in an anonymous tip letter to the DWP or HMRC, by offering to provide legal services for a small fee this could be regarded as a side hustle and this is the year that the HMRC are clamping down on those things.