Schlechter vs Lasker | The most remarkable game of the match | Schlechter vs Lasker R5 1910

The greatest collection of free chess videos:
chessschool.com.au/free-chess... Lasker had match conditions that specified that he would retain the title unless Schlechter won by two points until a return match.
Awesomely amazing: Free chess videos library:
chessschool.com.au/free-chess...
Carl Schlechter vs Emanuel Lasker
Lasker - Schlechter World Championship Match 1910, Vienna AUH, rd 5, Jan-22
Spanish Game: Berlin Defense. Closed Bernstein Variation (C66) · 1-0
Popular Openings Playlists
Spanish Opening
• Spanish Opening
Petrov's Defence
• Petrov's Defence
Slav Defense
• Slav Defense
Nimzo-Indian Defense
• Nimzo-Indian Defense
Scotch Opening
• Scotch Opening
Dutch Defense
• Dutch Defense
London System Opening
• London System Opening
Queen's Gambit
• Queen's Gambit
Semi Slav
• Semi Slav
Sicilian Defense
• Sicilian Defense
Pirc Defence
• Pirc Defence
English Opening
• English Opening
Queen Pawn Game
• Queen Pawn Game
French Defence
• French Defence
King's Gambit
• King's Gambit
Colle System
• Colle System
King's Indian Attack
• King's Indian Attack
King's Indian Defense
• King's Indian Defense
Fried Liver Attack
• Fried Liver Attack
Traxler Counterattack
• Traxler Counterattack
Italian Opening
• Italian Opening
Catalan Opening
• Catalan Opening
Vienna Game
• Vienna Game
Queen's indian defence
• Queen's indian defence
Caro-Kann Defense
• Caro-Kann Defense
Scandinavian Defense
• Scandinavian Defense
Bird's Opening
• Bird's Opening
Grunfeld Defense
• Grunfeld Defense
The Chigorin Defence
• The Chigorin Defence
Blackmar Diemer Gambit
• Blackmar Diemer Gambit
Benko Gambit
• Benko Gambit
Torre Attack
• Torre Attack
Nimzo-Larsen Attack
• Nimzo-Larsen Attack
Danish Gambit
• Danish Gambit
Schliemann Defense
• Schliemann Defense
Jerome Gambit
• Jerome Gambit
The Baltic Defense
• The Baltic Defense
The Accelerated Dragon
• The Accelerated Dragon
Van Geet (Dunst) Opening
• Van Geet (Dunst) Opening
Four Moves Checkmate
• Four Moves Checkmate
Bird Opening
• Judit Polgar's Chess G...
~-~~-~~~-~~-~
Please watch: "Caruana Beat A Super Grandmaster In 9 Moves"
• Caruana Beat A Super G...
~-~~-~~~-~~-~

[@exoplanet11]

Here's the difference between 20th Century Chess and 21st century chess: Nowadays, a position like that seen at 3:38 would probably be considered a draw and not even played out.

[@elcastorgrande]

"Between a rook and a hard place.:" Mato

[@ihortelvakh9604]

Thank you so much, dear Mato!

[@hassanalihusseini1717]

Thank you Mato for this instructive and beautiful game! I love this endgames with pawns and heavy pieces.

[@DanielEscovedo]

Very nice game. It's interesting to see that even the longest reigning world champion Lasker also commits mistakes.

[@Jerf1]

Wow that took a quick and surprising turn. Was almost sure black was going to take it! Thanks mato

[@ynwafanmrks1817]

Dobar Video Mato. Pozdrav iz Turska.

[@johnwarner3968]

Great game and analysis. Thank you!

[@shahbazsheikh3545]

Great game. Thanks Mato!

[@abhss]

Leatn little from victory and much from defeat. Thx Mato

[@MandeepSingh-ns1yq]

Thank u coach for this lesson ♥️

[@altimate1]

Pure chess. A game of wits.

[@betulaobscura]

Very nice!

[@reaganabroad4952]

Great game!

[@aboyousefemam1942]

Very good game , thanx , I liked how it ended

[@simonlepine7765]

Nice !

[@algoritma005]

Thanks mato

[@videvenkatavula9403]

thanks Mato

[@alexanderharveyconrad2409]

Very nice. :)

[@AroundTheW1]

Awesome

[@amyalindaily3781]

TKS.

[@damohanson5393]

What no blitz games to decide the championship? I think it’s a travesty the way the world championship is decided nowadays. They tied well ties go to the champion no speed chess. Another wonderful attacking game with a great back story. Thanks again Mato, you never fail to impress.

[@olasek7972]

Damo Hanson i don’t think introduction of blitz (only as a backup) is necessary a bad idea

[@KaisarAnvar]

Hi Mato! I've always been your fan since the beginning. I'm curious, what is your current Elo rating - USCF or FIDE?

[@pukulu]

Lasker was perhaps the greatest player in chess history in positions in which he needed to defend an inferior position. He didn't study opening theory all that much and often defended weak positions when he had the black pieces. Even so, he was especially hard to defeat in such positions.

[@joeyp1636]

What do I think? I think it's a shame that they didn't keep playing until there was a clear winner

[@renangivenu125]

Waiting chance to make best of the best possible right solutions for any things.

[@passengerplanetearth]

Thanks again for all your hard work Mato! I subscribe to a few chess channels and you are top of the league. I have a question or two. You must spend a lot of time analysing games and choosing which ones to show us. For each video you produce, how many games do you go through, on average? And how much time in total do you spend, per day or per week, analysing old chess games? Thanks!

[@MatoJelic]

It may take 3 hours to make 5 min video

[@jackcoleman5955]

Thanks for your efforts, Mato!!!

[@honoriuc]

That's all, folks!

[@threethrushes]

A philosophical question: If one cannot beat a World Champion, one does not deserve to become a World Champion. That statement appears uncontroversial. However, if a World Champion cannot defeat an opponent, does he deserve to be the World Champion? To answer my own question. Clearly, being World Champion doesn't mean that you can never be beaten. It is simply an arbitrary title given under set conditions. If the challenger agrees to the conditions, then fails to meet the standard, the incumbent retains the title. Still, the recent Carlsen-Caruana 2018 WC series brings these 100-year old questions into frame.

[@threethrushes]

@Oissev Onos I agree with your position. Thanks for contributing and have a good day yourself!

[@exoplanet11]

Champions who cannot beat, only tie their challengers deserve to remain Champions based simply on the idea that you have to have somebody as a world champ, and if no better champ can be found, then the current champs is the most logical choice. Another question is: why continue with the Candidates/Challenger/Champ model? Why not just put all players into a tournament and the winner is the champ? This would be more fair. However I'm not sure I prefer it. I like the continuity with the old chess practice and I think the notoriety of Chess increases with this format.

[@jeevithanumalla2752]

Can you also show the game between Schleter and Reti

[@secretsquirrel5566]

I've often found myself between a rook and a hard place. Didn't work out for me either...

[@jeevithanumalla2752]

Sclechter vs Alekhine ??

[@versatilemind9130]

Demanding two points ahead. Lasker seemed to be a really bad sportsman.

[@skakdosmer]

This is what I hate about queen endgames! You can have a very good position when boom, something went wrong! One tiny mistake and you’re dead! I think Lasker's mistake was trying to hide his king in the open field. An old friend of mine might have described it as “The Spread Legs' Defence”.

[@skakdosmer]

Glad you agree.

[@jackcoleman5955]

Yes, I have extreme difficulty in those Q/R endgames. Tiny mistake= dead.