Mechanical Engineering: Particle Equilibrium (11 of 19) Why are Pulleys a Mechanical Advantage?

[@ricafe]

How can someone dislike such knowledge transfer ... and for free ??? This is such a great physics teach ! Thank you Sir. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[@sailordou]

Missclick I guess

[@soisun2658]

Many of the dislikes, if not all, sometimes, are from KZbin itself. Believe it or not, that's the truth. YT has no interest for a video to get only likes. So they keep the balance "right".

[@muhammedalshameri801]

Physics haters I guess

[@ilmostro16]

I’m convinced there’s a small percentage of people out there which are always acting as trolls. They thumbs down everything no matter how good it might be. Think Joker... they just want to watch the world burn (but all they have the balls to do is thumbs down some videos lol)

[@goatdwarfs]

I do not dislike the premise(free knowledge transfer), but I do dislike this video because of the methods he's chosen to explain this concept. Just iterating through different pulleys by calculating tension is not teaching physics, its doing algebra. Its lessons like this that make physics seem dull to certain populations, and physics is not dull. Here are some concepts I would've loved to see elaborated on: Why is the weight sometimes attached to the rope & other times attatched to the pulley? How does the tension in the rope fixed to the structure change through the presented configurations? What movements in the system result in the operator having to pull more length of rope in configurations with more mechanical advantage?

[@williamstanley7775]

I am a retired 82 year old electrical engineer and this helped me review some of the material from a Statics course that I took many years ago! Thanks!

[@trwent]

Statics is more important for civil engineering than for electrical, I would think.

[@alext8828]

Happy to hear that. Just saw Wm. Shatner at 93. Still razor sharp, no hair loss or grey. I wanna know what he's doing to stay young. I hope you have many more years of learning and remembering.

[@thaerthaer1120]

I think it's same as the transformer in the electrical engineering reducing the voltage getting high current here reduce the force getting more distance

[@cullenpassmore1933]

When my teacher tried explaining this to the class they didn't mention that you would have to pull it longer for each pulley. Saying that helped alot thanks

[@albertoolmos21]

Distance x Force = Work. This means that "moving" pulleys allow you to do the same work with less force with proportionally more displacement. Fixed pulleys work differently.

[@johnjacobjinglehimerschmid3555]

@@albertoolmos21 How are they different. I just assume he drew the pulleys separately to show how many ... that the point of axis would only be in the free body diagrams.

[@johnjacobjinglehimerschmid3555]

@Glenn Heiselman Yeah ... in my youth my dad had a 2/3 or 3/4 rope pulley. Meaning 2 or 3 pulleys on top and 3 or 4 on the bottom .... and it felt like, when I had to roll it up, a mile of rope.

[@davidschmidt6013]

Cullen, with simple machines, it's always distance that gets traded for increased mechanical advantage. Levers are the same. If a lever has one side 4X as long as the other side (measuring from the fulcrum) it will have 4X the mechanical advantage (i.e. can lift 4x its input force) , but must travel 4 times as far. With hydraulic systems, same idea. The input 'piston' must travel however much the larger (output) piston is. Ex. if the input piston is 2 sq. inches in area, and the output is 8 sq inches, the input piston must travel 4X as far.

[@tramquangpho]

One question :For example , he only explain the tension force between two point of the pulley connecting to the object , what about the tension force on the other pulley, for example, in the second example, the one connecting to the object is 50N, but is the other one tension is 50N is too or not?

[@ovalwingnut]

I'm 64 and NOW I finally get it 😁 Thank you!

[@MichelvanBiezen]

I am still learning new things every day myself. :)

[@khalid969]

I'm 52 and I studied this in school but forgot how it worked. Now I'm going to remember how it works forever :D

[@dleivam]

@@SharpObserver1A Talk is cheap.. Let's see your video with a better explanation.

[@dickfitzinya3082]

@@SharpObserver1A Yeah, but the 99.99% of us here watching interesting physics videos mixed in with funny cat videos really don't give a sh!t.

[@beoptimistic5853]

https: //kzbin.info/www/bejne/i3nSlHp-nNqKgKs👍👍👍👍👍👍👍

[@mindyourbusiness46]

You truly are an epitome of a professor. So effortless and amazing. It's a joy watching your videos. Thank you so much sir.

[@marwanhossameldinhamed3278]

I’m truly thankful for your content, i’ve aced at least 4 courses in uni just because of you, now graduated i owe a big part of this to you

[@MichelvanBiezen]

Congratulations! You owe it to your hard work. We are glad we could be part of it. 🙂

[@ericastier1646]

You study this at Uni ?? Gosh levels have gone down dramatixally this used to be junior High School Physics class. In University you should study mechanical tensors. No wonder the younger generation have gone dumb.

[@Kysushanz]

@@ericastier1646 Yeah, I learnt this in my second year in Highschool. Not only this, but beam design, polar diagrams, HP, torque etc. What the hell is happening to the youth of today???

[@ericastier1646]

@@Kysushanz A lack of strict discipline, a lack of respect for elders and a degenerated media and technology that has been commercialized for bad purposes (the smartphone = dumbphone). Meritocracy is disappearing, it's why learning in school has been devalorized. This is due to the influence of floating currency attributable to the jews.

[@saileshnaidu8102]

@@Kysushanz dude, i learned AP calculus when i was barely able to chew yet, u guys are pussies ngl

[@anneyshamisra8267]

THIS IS A REAL ADVANTAGE FOR THE STUDENTS INFLICTED WITH THE PAIN OF COPYING THE AFORESAID PROBLEMS WITHOUT HAVING A SLIGHTEST HINT OF WHAT THEY ARE COPYING.#AMAZINGWORK.

[@johnstrawb3521]

This is how it's done, people! Superb approach. Clean, clear opening diagram. Four examples for comparison, right in front of us. Quick overview, then right to it. I rarely enjoy teaching on the internet, but this is impressive.

[@MichelvanBiezen]

Thank you and glad you enjoyed it!

[@astseesit]

This teacher saved us and got us through physics30 in 30 days. It was an intense schedule and this KZbin teacher was the best resource. Wish he was my teacher in life. Thank you Sir!

[@MichelvanBiezen]

Glad you found our videos and you found them helpful! 🙂

[@deepikalabh6713]

I am an Indian and at first I thought that it might be hard for me to understand but I dis it.. Thankk you so much sir!! MAY LORD SIVAH BLESS YOU!!

[@MichelvanBiezen]

Thank you. Welcome to the channel! 🙂

[@armador72]

I am 36 years old. In my high school years ,No one understood this lesson to me that way. Thank you very much for this practical information. I wish you continued success.

[@MichelvanBiezen]

Thank you. We are glad you enjoyed the video. 🙂

[@nightmare4155]

Better explained than my physics professor at the university

[@spazmoidectomorf6209]

Are you university in uk in america, I'm just curious.

[@jamesd7700]

@@spazmoidectomorf6209 He made that up. He lives in a basement.

[@spazmoidectomorf6209]

@@jamesd7700 lol, I know, I just wanted to know how the syllabus varies from uni to uni and from country to country

[@beoptimistic5853]

https: //kzbin.info/www/bejne/i3nSlHp-nNqKgKs👍👍👍👍

[@MuhammadAli-gn4hx]

Dont degrade your teacher.

[@stroys7061]

50 years ago I took a year of college physics. Your style is very similar to my professors back then. Great presentation! Thanks

[@beoptimistic5853]

https: //kzbin.info/www/bejne/i3nSlHp-nNqKgKs👍👍👍👍👍👍

[@johncarlofajardo9560]

I was introduced to this channel in my 3rd yr in Engineering School. There is so much to learn in these videos, and it is well explained. Thank you for your lectures, good sir! You are a hero! :D

[@MichelvanBiezen]

Thank you for sharing. We have put a lot of work into these (9500) videos and we appreciate this kind of feedback.

[@YogiliciousP]

Your ability to teach is superb! You're clear & mention the little details which greatly improves understanding. This video helped me more fully understand a problem where a pully had mass. Thank you.

[@ManasPatnaikofficial]

I am inspired......... Your articulation is fabulous...

[@azaanahmad6265]

sir you are no less

[@kamesh7621]

Sir your not less then him

[@shahdnour5430]

@@azaanahmad6265 m

[@shahdnour5430]

@@azaanahmad6265 .

[@shahdnour5430]

@@azaanahmad6265 Thanks

[@bob456fk6]

Very good explanation. I studied this many decades ago and this was a good refresher.

[@beoptimistic5853]

https: //kzbin.info/www/bejne/i3nSlHp-nNqKgKs👍👍👍👍👍👍

[@fatmagamal2247]

You make it seem so easy. Thanks professor/teacher.

[@nrask8727]

so many videos take 16 -20 minutes to explain, in a more roundabout way, what you clearly explain in 5:51. thank you.

[@MichelvanBiezen]

Thank you. Glad you liked it.

[@zaphbrox8239]

I skipped this topic in school and never got around to learning it. Now, 30 years later, I understand it, and it seems so simple!. Thank you!!

[@MichelvanBiezen]

Excellent!

[@MrMagyar5]

People forget how amazing these simple things are and how efficient they are. Still used today in all our construction projects. Cranes are just giant pulleys.

[@MichelvanBiezen]

Good observation! Yes, they are used in many applications.

[@Jon-xq3kn]

I watched another video just before this one that was completely incomprehensible. Thanks for giving a logical explanation of how mechanical advantage works in 6 minutes.

[@thegreatelfinko]

Very nice job. Your video acting ironically as a set of pulleys and I was able to lift the load of the understanding which I couldn't figure out before, and deposit it into my head. Thanks

[@MichelvanBiezen]

😂🙂😂

[@K4SRF]

I am working on a pulley system for an antenna tower. I needed a refresher about pulleys learned back in my college days. You're explanation was fantastic and actually helped me remember things I had forgotten. Thanks! --Steve

[@MichelvanBiezen]

Glad I could help

[@kovacszsolt6005]

I'm sure there are university students out there who spent 90+ minutes on a lecture for this to be explained poorly, while this man tells it in 5 minutes so clearly my 7 year old sister understood it perfectly.

[@charlesbradford6738]

I noticed this is 8 years old, but I had to comment anyway: If you factor in the efficiency of each pulley (frictional losses), you may no longer get mechanical advantage after about 5 lines. If a pulley was .9 eff, then it would take 110 lbs of pull to hoist 100 lbs of load. A spread sheet will show that the pulling force no longer decreases when continue to add lines and pulleys.

[@MichelvanBiezen]

Yes indeed. That said, pulleys heavy very little friciton and do not require that much energy to rotate them.

[@0126jmc]

Seriously, you brought me through my Engineering Degree. Thank you for ALL your videos.

[@MichelvanBiezen]

Thank you for sharing. All the best to you.

[@markjensen7449]

After watching other videos on pulleys I get a basic understanding. But I found myself asking “But how or why?” No one explained that part of the pulleys. Or did that it didn’t register with me. But your explanation left me with my question answered. You’re an awesome teacher!!!

[@miguelferreiramoutajunior2475]

This guy is one that can be surely said as a Very Nice teacher.

[@GREMLINS516]

Clear, efficient without any unnecessary blabla, Brilliant!

[@MichelvanBiezen]

Thank you. Glad you liked it! 🙂

[@peterschmidt1453]

It's been so long since I did physics, this brings it all back, I had forgotten how simple pulleys can be so easily calculated

[@fizixx]

This is the best approach I've ever seen for doing pulley problems.

[@MichelvanBiezen]

Thank you. Glad you liked it.

[@fizixx]

@@MichelvanBiezen : )

[@sirensoundsgood]

I... I might actually have a chance of passing my ASVAB test now... thank you so much sir, this is amazing

[@MichelvanBiezen]

All the best

[@HOLLIDAY2023-di9lv]

You did a Master Class that will open new doors for me. Thank you kindly Sir. Keep up the genius explanations.

[@MichelvanBiezen]

Thank you. Glad you are enjoying the videos.

[@AJ-et3vf]

Awesome lecture! I wish I found these lectures years ago when I took introductory mechanics so I would've loved and appreciated it more.

[@MichelvanBiezen]

Glad it was helpful!

[@williambtm1]

Thanks, Michael van Biezen for your pully power demonstration. I am no Brainiac yet I can learn the principles such as you have narrated for us per the above video to understand the importance of each required principle.

[@eternalmangekyou968]

I just have my JEE entrance in a few months and this helped me revise my Atwood Machine dynamics in a single go, Thanks a bunch Sir 🙏✌️✌️

[@MichelvanBiezen]

Good luck on your JEE test!

[@82h4dheu6]

Got postponed right ? To June

[@eternalmangekyou968]

@@82h4dheu6 August

[@82h4dheu6]

@@eternalmangekyou968 Advance august And mains June and July Btw I'm jee 2023 aspirant

[@eternalmangekyou968]

@@82h4dheu6 best of luck for it , im not pretty much mains oriented , it's rather a way for me to appear inthe Advanced paper for which I've prepared for 2 years

[@vbl20012k7]

Awesome teaching video. That way of transferring knowledge not only help students understand theories, but also make them curious, love and study creatively. Thank you!

[@MichelvanBiezen]

Thank you for your comment.

[@Teyanvrinn]

I know it’s probably the norm, but I am so happy to see the metric system in an US physics video

[@MichelvanBiezen]

You're welcome 😊

[@abodabod-uw2nz]

Thank you, sir. You have been the reason for my understanding of many issues that help me to finish my major and now i have a double major diploma in biomedical and electrical and electronics engineering. Thanks alot sir i really appreciate your efforts 🙏.

[@MichelvanBiezen]

Congratulations! You have accomplished a lot. We are glad to have had a small part in it.😃

[@mikeearls126]

AT this point, we can learn everything we need to know right here on the internet from brilliant people like this guy....200k for college? I dont know...i hope that requirement (societal requirement) changes sometime soon

[@Dislob]

200k is only for the "official" little paper at the end.

[@aarondavis5386]

Yes and no certainly I agree that college is over priced and you can learn almost anything from internet sources, but you may not know what you need to know. I think there is still value to an institution that defines what knowledge is required for a particular field and requires a proof of understanding

[@jerrysmith9780]

Made a sizable donation just now. You have peaked my 16 yr old son's interest in Physics...and mine too. Thank you.

[@MichelvanBiezen]

We appreciate that very much.

[@coolmonkey619]

why am i going to uni when your free content is better?

[@axelnils]

Yo wut Triggered much?

[@kurtshaw229]

Yo wut Thats just liberal arts people. Theres more reasonable people in STEM in my experience.

[@kurtshaw229]

Yo wut Thats just liberal arts people. Theres more reasonable people in STEM in my experience.

[@arpitkumar4525]

Dr. Stone brought me here. If only I had watched this in high school. Now I am working as a software engineer and I don't need to use this information about pulleys but watching the Dr. Stone anime made me interested in science again and a lot more. I highly recommend that anime if you are interested in science

[@mikefochtman7164]

I'd like to see the force on the top-most pulley 'hanger'. It seems in the first example, that the attachment to the 'ceiling' has to support 200 N, the second only 150N, 133-1/3N for the third, and 125 N for the final example? So having more mechanical advantage just happens to also lessen the needed strength of the attachment point?

[@Hipyon]

that's antigravity know

[@satrioekowicaksono7452]

In reality the ceiling would also support the pulley weight.

[@yougoattube]

Mr. (Dr?) vB can answer authoritatively... but my thought is, the ceiling always supports 100N. Based on the assumptions, the pulleys weigh nothing, the rope/cable weighs nothing... weight at the ceiling must be 100N. That said, I expect there may be some exception between the time force is applied by pulling down, and when the pulley(s) / weight actually begin to move... I see where you’re coming from - if I am pulling on the cable with 100N, and the weight is 100N, then the ceiling must be holding 200N. Now I have a headache. Engineering school was way, way, WAY too long ago...

[@elonmask50]

Fabulous video on mechanical advantage. Looks like all the primary school teachers are giving this a thumbs down, either that or 165 Americans have watched it and are still trying to convert it into Fahren-feet.

[@petethewrist]

Nice to see this explained as I have always just took pullys for grantedmm Thanks

[@beoptimistic5853]

https: //kzbin.info/www/bejne/i3nSlHp-nNqKgKs👍👍👍👍👍👍

[@wayneyadams]

3:29 The reason you have to pull the rope 2 meters to lift the weight 1-meter can be understood in the following way. Since there are two ropes supporting the weight both ropes have to be raised 1-meter when the weight is lifted 1-meter which is a total of 2-meters. That means the rope you are pulling must be pulled 2-meters, 1-meter for each of the two ropes supporting the weight. The same is true for 3 ropes, 4 ropes and so on. It also makes sense when you consider the work done in lifting the load. The work is the same (minus any losses from friction of course) in our ideal case no matter how many pulleys you use. Work = force X distance, so exerting half the force means the rope must be pulled twice the distance. The number of ropes supporting the load is the mechanical advantage. Divide the load by that number to get the force you must exert, and multiply the distance the load is lifted to get the length of rope you must pull.

[@MichelvanBiezen]

Nice input.

[@wayneyadams]

@@MichelvanBiezen 33 years teaching Physics has a few benefits (getting rich is not one of them). LOL

[@MichelvanBiezen]

HaHa, yes indeed.

[@_John_Sean_Walker]

Nicest video about police I have ever seen.

[@billjoyce5525]

Thank you for sharing your knowledge. I have been going to gyms for years and have always been curious about the mathematics behind pullys

[@MichelvanBiezen]

They do have practical applications.

[@bobgarr6246]

If with no formal training you understand the theory, principles, function and use of mechanical advantage then this should be a breeze to grasp. Sometimes, with no formal education necessity forces one to discover ways to make work less burdensome. And the lever and pulley are the perfect place to start.

[@whyohwhy357]

So simple! Thank you Sir! No formulas, just common sense.

[@MichelvanBiezen]

Glad it helped!

[@uturniaphobic]

Seems a lot like a lever and fulcrum. great video!

[@beoptimistic5853]

https: //kzbin.info/www/bejne/i3nSlHp-nNqKgKs👍👍👍👍👍👍

[@aarondavis5386]

I mean in the sense that you can multiply a small force by applying it over more distance I guess so

[@warbywar1]

I'm 55 years old. I studied at school 35 years ago. But your teaching method is excellent. WAR Sri Lanka

[@MichelvanBiezen]

Thanks!

[@Michael-im1vc]

Great explanation! Now, i need to get an understanding of how to actually rig pulleys in a series like that.

[@beoptimistic5853]

https: //kzbin.info/www/bejne/i3nSlHp-nNqKgKs👍👍👍👍👍👍

[@aarondavis5386]

If it help you can visualize it as two pulleys with multiple wheels on a common axle where the smaller wheels are behind the larger ones from a side perspective.

[@revanthkumar2916]

Thank your very much for this , thought i studied the whole chapter i could't understand it because i was taught using variables using numbers is a huge gamechanger !

[@MichelvanBiezen]

Using a simple example with numbers often clarifies things tremendously. Glad you liked it.

[@graphicsociety1]

Beautifully explained, to the point and simple. Thank you.

[@beoptimistic5853]

https: //kzbin.info/www/bejne/i3nSlHp-nNqKgKs👍👍👍👍👍👍

[@MemphisRob13]

Thanks for a simple, straightforward explanation with nothing omitted.

[@MichelvanBiezen]

You're welcome! Glad you enjoyed it. 🙂

[@alhapidzteguhgumilar]

so, 100/1, 100/2, 100/3, & 100/4 depends on the number of string. Better explanation than my univ prof haha

[@NoosaHeads]

Good description. Thank you for explaining an issue that's been a mystery to me for years.

[@n2bfw884]

I don't often condone witchcraft, but when I do, it's this channel.

[@AR-fd8tc]

We all share your concern with being caught up in the Dark Arts , but I have all confidence that within the century science will discover a perfectly rational explanation for this gravity defying allusion and trickery.

[@davidazinger5639]

no idle talk from start to finish; 100% to the point all the way thru; all very well said,; thank you!

[@beoptimistic5853]

https: //kzbin.info/www/bejne/i3nSlHp-nNqKgKs👍👍👍👍👍

[@dyldevin]

I'm curious about the forces applied to the line itself in these MA systems. According to the laws of pulleys in example 2, you could lift 100 newtons with a line that was only rated for 50 newtons? The work is being done, in my mind that 100 newtons of force has to be acting on the line in the middle of the lower pulley.

[@patrickbroyer5518]

It's 50 Newtons pulling to the left balancing 50 Newtons pulling to the right. So the tension would be 50 Newtons (ignoring the traction on the pulley and stretch as the weight is applied.)

[@jorgemacgenity1367]

Very well explained. Thank you Sr. With explanations like this is much easier to learn.

[@MichelvanBiezen]

Glad it was helpful! 🙂

[@markmillers4491]

Some teachers are just better, that would be you sir.

[@beoptimistic5853]

https: //kzbin.info/www/bejne/i3nSlHp-nNqKgKs👍👍👍👍👍

[@bakcia]

I attended class and left with an understanding of the subject matter. Thank you, sir! I believe I read that pulleys were the first mass produced mechanical item. The British Empire went through mass amounts of them for their vast naval fleet.

[@MichelvanBiezen]

Interesting comment! 🙂

[@ahmedal-ebrashy3691]

Sir the idea that something is hanging from the middle of the pulley makes zero sense to me unless that point rotates.. can you briefly clarify it?

[@cola5323]

It looked so intimidating, but ur simple explanation rly made things clear. Thank you!

[@MichelvanBiezen]

You are welcome.

[@foxhound1008]

Professor Van Biezen: another excellent video, I really enjoy your channel, and have become a monthly donor. Another interesting aspect of pulleys, and please correct me if I’m wrong, is that the up forces must equal the down forces in the scenario in the above video. For instance, on the first pulley system, the total “down” forces are the weight (100n) and the pulling down force of 100n. Which means the ceiling is actually supporting a 200n load. In the fourth setup, the total down forces is only 125n, therefore the load on the ceiling Is only 125n So, in addition to the mechanical advantage in “pulling” the fourth setup actually reduces the load on the ceiling, correct?

[@MichelvanBiezen]

You are correct indeed.

[@ashraf736]

Force on celling in each cases are respectively- 1- 200N 2- 100N 3- 66.67N 4- 50N just draw the FBD( free body diagram) for pulley attach to celling for reaction given by celling . Dont account 100N block in this case.

[@foxhound1008]

ashraf khan not sure where you are getting those numbers from, as they are only part, not the total. System is in static equilibrium. No accelerations are occurring. Sum of all torques must equal zero AND sum of all forces must equal zero. Up forces = down forces. Down forces are the weight and whatever down force I’m pulling with. Ceiling supplies up load. If I was to put a spring scale between the final (top) pulley and the ceiling, the spring scale would show: 1: 200 N 2: 150 N 3: 132 N 4: 125 N Imagine in the second example, a 50 Newton person was hanging on the rope, not touching the floor. The 100 Newton weight is also not touching the floor. The FBD of the top pulley has a force pulling down of 150 N and a force, provided by the ceiling, in the up direction of 150N. The force distribution would be: 50 N on the right 50 N in the middle 50 N on the left

[@ashraf736]

@@foxhound1008 my mistake i forget the force due to the secondaries pullies in FBD of primary pulley(attach to celling).

[@shortbyprince]

Thank you so much sir I got such a best knowladge here now. You are now one of the best teachers of mine. Love and respect from India.

[@MichelvanBiezen]

Thank you and welcome to the channel

[@anaaya3131]

That was brilliantly done sir! You taught me something in 5 minutes that I had failed to understand in 3 days.

[@jiniustech9959]

3 days? I didn't understand for a month

[@Serpthz]

Dr.Stone senku ishigami brought me here, and this is VERY USEFULLLL

[@easton9583]

Love it when anime inspires people to learn new things! I also watch Dr. Stone!

[@gokhanhaldan]

Şekli ortadan böl. Yük /Kuvvet kolu hariç diğer ip sayısı

[@colinmccarthy7921]

I studied the Mechanics of Machines in my Degree.There is your Answer.❤️❤️❤️❤️.

[@Weiss_Hikari]

Thank you sir. I was a little bit confused on this.

[@d.s.5807]

Thank you, that was so well taught that not only do I now understand pullies better but it makes complete sense to me

[@MichelvanBiezen]

Thank you for your comment. Glad it was helpful 🙂

[@narayanmajumdar9844]

God bless humans like you :)

[@sport8133]

Explanation is clear and concise. Much better than that Southerner who had great visuals and cute assistants (his kids), but unclear explanations.

[@wysiwygsd]

To pull the 100N object up, wouldn't you need a force >100N? Just asking...

[@MichelvanBiezen]

Only with the pulley on the left. You need less force for the other pulley combinations.

[@MichelvanBiezen]

I reread you question and understand what you are asking now. You only need a force > 100 N momentarily until the object begins to move. Then only a force = 100 N is needed to keep the object moving at a constant speed. (Newton's 2nd law)

[@wysiwygsd]

@@MichelvanBiezen Bodies in motion tend to stay in motion, bodies at rest tend to stay at rest... Thank you for the responses.

[@firedome8]

Entropy always gets paid.

[@davidmartin1015]

On a practical note I use pulleys quite a bit,(fairly simple pulleys). What we call a block and tackle, ie , 2 pulleys, one with 2 pulley wheels the other with 1 pulley wheel. Both have a hook , the rope goes over the first wheel of the double pulley then down and over the second, then back up to the first . Then the end of the rope coming out of the second pulley is the one you pull on to lift the weight. The top, double pulley is attached to a beam while the bottom pulley is hooked onto the load,(in this case an animal carcasse). Fairly easy to lift anything up to about 100 kg.

[@MichelvanBiezen]

That is great information.

[@MadLadMartyMcFly85]

Soooooo the anchor point is still bearing the full weight of the load,plus weight of rope and pulleys* right??

[@JeyDeee89]

Then: Meh... school is boring, lets sleep. Now: Ohh let's watch a physiks class.

[@oliverm8058]

sameeee lol. Mostly because instead of taking classes that I'm actually interesting in like engineering and physics I am forced to take classes like Spanish and gym.

[@P6009D]

Mechanical advantages are often only advantages in theory. We neglect the friction to make the calculations easier. Suppose we are to rescue a climber who has fallen down a cliff, the person weighs 90kg and we use pullys in a 9:1 system. Do we then only need to pull with the power a ninth? The friction in the system cannot be neglected. Climbers use dynamic ropes to avoid injury if they fall. Let's say the person in distress has to be lifted 10 meters, there will be a lot of rope to stretch before we even lift anything at all. So in practical cases it can happen that we get a better mechanical advantage if we instead lift the person with a 3:1 system. Your calculations are a good starting point for describing reality.

[@MichelvanBiezen]

We first learn the principles of physics by ignoring things like friction and wind resistance. Then once we understand the principles, we add the compexities of wind resistance and friction. (We have videos on ropes and friction in the mechanical engineering videos).

[@rezafarahani9635]

Great,thank you master.

[@babarasif1540]

Hiii

[@babarasif1540]

Follow me on instagram babar Asif 000

[@delladog]

Well explained, why couldnt my high school teacher have simply explained it this way, well done

[@MichelvanBiezen]

Thank you. Glad you liked it.

[@lovernotfighter]

I learned to just count the number of pulleys so you can say 1:1 or 2:1, 3:1, 4:1 etc. so you know the ratios.

[@antisymmetric237]

Great explanation, easy to follow and straight to the point. You are a great teacher.

[@MichelvanBiezen]

Thank you. Glad you found our videos! 🙂

[@pbrooks4040]

I understand the math and physics, but I can’t come up with a verbal explanation of how and/or why it works - except to say, “magic”.

[@MichelvanBiezen]

The principle here is that the work done pulling on the rope equals the work done lifting the object. W = Force x distance and if you half the force you must double the distance.

[@danielgudi7446]

@@MichelvanBiezen it still sounds like it exploits physics to me

[@andresbaylon5552]

What isnt mentioned here is the ceiling that is holding everything up is exerting an equal and opposite force to hold everything up. when you pull on the rope u are exerting more force on the ceiling in order to lift the object.its like having another person pull the other side of the rope.

[@jensdanbolt6953]

@@danielgudi7446 If you write what exactly sounds strange, I think someone here can give you a solid, direct answer to the issue.

[@danielgudi7446]

@@jensdanbolt6953 I know that you trade travel way for force and you can use your own body weight as force instead of having to lift yourself up as well as the load. The second point is a big advantage on it's own but I don't really get how the first point makes any sense. I know that it is a meme that people compare everything with video games but that just sounds like a big to me

[@margravekevin7765]

This is how things should be taught. At a certain point in a person's education, visualization becomes a key part in learning because it gets closer to real world application. Most can't do that by simply reading the problem in a book.

[@annonYk]

Archimedes lifted a warship with his own physical power using a complex system of pulleys!!!!

[@beoptimistic5853]

https: //kzbin.info/www/bejne/i3nSlHp-nNqKgKs👍👍👍👍👍

[@cannonfodderangry6517]

Atlas: “Interesting...”

[@lancelotshih6869]

@William W. Campbell-Shepherd IX probably constructing a pully with a mechanical advantage so large that he doesn't need to spend energy and pain holding up the world, he can just tie himself down and lift the world

[@nangialkhan2099]

I have never seen such explaination more easier than my teacher at school In fact i did not get all of my repectable and beloved teacher

[@msanchez1210]

Thank you it’s very clear the way you x plain it

[@noahschmartz2354]

Beautiful explanation, please keep doing these, u have the rare gift of clarification.

[@beoptimistic5853]

https: //kzbin.info/www/bejne/i3nSlHp-nNqKgKs👍👍👍👍👍

[@2401321]

if he was my physics teacher i might have solved every pulley question in JEE

[@beoptimistic5853]

https: //kzbin.info/www/bejne/i3nSlHp-nNqKgKs👍👍👍👍👍👍

[@pankajkhati9601]

I am from india 🇮🇳 Thank you sir, You explained this topic very well.

[@MichelvanBiezen]

Glad you liked it. Welcome to the channel.

[@vmia159]

Any one click this video becuase of Dr. Stone?

[@akprice8242]

Nope. But I'm gonna check dr stone because of this comment.

[@niaduplessis6146]

I have my science exam tomorrow and this was such a big help!!

[@MichelvanBiezen]

Good luck on your exam tomorrow

[@VlrStarich]

Все понятно. Спасибо!

[@LivingTheDream6871]

Golly gee mr. Wizard. You made the complicated easy to understand......

[@MichelvanBiezen]

Thanks!

[@ardalla535]

Well, yes ... but. "You can draw a free body diagram around the object you are pulling up." That is not explained well because by the time you get to the end, that free body diagram is not just around the object you are pulling up but is drawn around the object itself and 2 pulleys. Why? Why not draw the free body diagram around all 5 objects? The explanation of that would add complexity to the presentation and would probably cause the students to scratch their heads.

[@nosleepdelirium1214]

Your comment is making me scratch my head. Why would you WANT students to be confused..... the reason he has so many thankful people is because he does a fantastic job making physics more accesible

[@andycabrera6684]

Simple explanation. The box goes around the load and the system that is tied to it. Not included is the anchor and the system tied to the anchor. Make sense now?