The bot looks like it is coming along nicely. Now all they have to do is Adcock.
@mums21099 ай бұрын
This made me longer than I should have
@ST5S59 ай бұрын
😂😂😂
@Appalations9 ай бұрын
@@mums2109 😂
@YREHCorp9 ай бұрын
@@mums2109ew
@420blazinOG9 ай бұрын
💀💀
@glennalexon15309 ай бұрын
How big a share of an unprofitable company does one need to own to be called a billionaire by Forbes? Is this company the next Theranos or the next FTX?
@AdamBechtol9 ай бұрын
Mmmm
@sidsays11989 ай бұрын
Theranos had an impossible product, RTX had access to customer money that the owner stole. This is a product that already exists in beta and has shown real progress.
@kajmobile9 ай бұрын
He founded other companies that had big exits
@ST5S59 ай бұрын
You can literally see the product working in the video
@Observer1689 ай бұрын
Everything could be staged
@DeZiio9 ай бұрын
Then Boston Dynamics comes in and makes this tech look 20 years old
@gytispranskunas49849 ай бұрын
You are missing the point of this robot. It's not about how it moves. It's about A.I integration. Boston dynamics robots can only do what they are programmed to do. This one can do whatever you ask it to do. It's very limited now. But it's just the beginning. 10 years from now, you will see warehouses full of these robots
@DeZiio9 ай бұрын
@@gytispranskunas4984 you realize Microsoft owns both OpenAi and Boston Dynamics lol Two wings same bird
@johnshoemakerpbc9 ай бұрын
Not at all. This one has vastly different roles than BD’s.
@fubar123459 ай бұрын
BD have already conceded they were wrong about hydraulics based bots. Old hydraulic Atlas retired, new Atlas uses electric actuators. No they can't do backflips anymore - they don't need to. Software is more important than hardware. A bot of average human strength is good enough, it doesn't need to be superhuman.
@gu84869 ай бұрын
@@gytispranskunas4984 their new robot will have ai now
@calyl9 ай бұрын
Will wait for the expose...
@redgrant48979 ай бұрын
The new Atlas arrived today. Atlas IS the future.
@paulchristopherlittle9 ай бұрын
whats that
@justarty1849 ай бұрын
@@paulchristopherlittle boston dynamics robot, way more impressive than this, but this one is surely far from being worst
@jayem89819 ай бұрын
Atlas doesn’t appear to have cognitive recognition however. So, there appears to be a difference between the two.
@redgrant48979 ай бұрын
@@jayem8981 That is just connecting to the Cloud. The Cloud is where the compute happens. You don't want it on board.
@Ian-vb8hp9 ай бұрын
@@jayem8981 That's quite an assumption from a 30 second video.
@Venture_Fanatic9 ай бұрын
The Labor Crisis is that not one of these Companies wants to pay a living wage for these 10 Million Jobs no one wants.
@jimj26839 ай бұрын
Look at his previous startups. He just rides hype waves and exits at the top. Take his previous company Archer: He tried to build E-VTOL taxis. He sold it to some gullible investors. Look around, there are virtually no E-VTOL taxis to be found. The same will happen with Figure. He will exit at the top of the hype curve and the robot bubble will burst. All he is doing now is putting together all the existing tech to try to make investors think that innovation is happening fast. Nothing new is happening in his company. Once he sells, the apparent development will stop and we will be waiting many decades before humanoid robots actually become useful. Elon Musk and many others do similar stuff too. It is all about trying to impress gullible investors and getting their money before the investors realize the tech will not really be there for another 20-50 years.
@Os_-tw4ot9 ай бұрын
20-50 years is still a very short time
@krystalmarie56379 ай бұрын
Interesting perspective
@aroaris8439 ай бұрын
I agree
@sssssssss1119 ай бұрын
Well, that's what most of them do. He's probably proud of it as well
@Wittgenstein.9 ай бұрын
You're not the sharpest tool in the shed, are you?
@mylooooooooooo9 ай бұрын
Brett Adcock is 38 years old! i thought he was like 24 :O
@charlech9 ай бұрын
Great, now I have a decade to catch up to him 😂
@SublimeAudioBooks11119 ай бұрын
Nah, he looks like 38 in my opinion.
@cooliipie9 ай бұрын
I 30 and he looks 10 years older than me. Seems right
@aditya_on_youtube9 ай бұрын
@@cooliipie I'm 38 and he looks at least 5 - 8 years younger to me.
@lylefranksaunders21139 ай бұрын
You don't get 24yo billionaires
@caliniaru16739 ай бұрын
How much was Forbes paid for this?
@Sportbaxk2379 ай бұрын
Exactly cuz this dude isn’t a billionaire and this stuff doesn’t even seem sustainable. Reminds me of Trevor Milton from Nikola Trucking who is currently in jail that Forbes also featured
@sp1239 ай бұрын
Forbes is the new payola
@cynthia-jo1zz9 ай бұрын
His clienteles could be much from asia making him a billionaire...asia wantsss this technology soo bad..so every American and or European with an innovation is having contracts there.
@stt.94339 ай бұрын
Exactly it's a nothing burger, he's clearly using his wallstreet pull to get this interview.
@JesusFollower5969 ай бұрын
It’s not that serious relax smh 🤦 ppl are slow
@One_Fatal8 ай бұрын
I like how they never talked about Optimus and how it will be much more competitive with mass production.
@ShahramHesabani9 ай бұрын
I just hope we use them to solve problems and not create them. Advances in A.I surely can be debated for the good of humans, though most will argue that only a few will benefit especially to their pockets, at the end, interesting to see what the future holds
@ZinatNazaraghai9 ай бұрын
I also agree that it will be interesting. I just wonder if resources are not misplaced in this project. Take a look at the industrial revolution millions of people were made for life simply because they made the right decisions at the time thereby creating generational wealth.
@YousefMilanian9 ай бұрын
I wasn't born into generational wealth but I am definitely on my way to creating one, $615k in profits in one year is surely a start in the right path for me and my dream. Others had luck born in wealth, I have a brain that works.
@NasrinHashemian9 ай бұрын
I bet you had inherited money laying around and was gifted to you to be able to achieve such
@YousefMilanian9 ай бұрын
No such thing happened, I did a lot of research on how the rich do it and this led me to meet, Linda Alice parisi . Having someone specialized in a particular field do a job does wonders fyi. I gave her 100 grand at first
@theonemox9 ай бұрын
The convergence of AI and robotics we are starting to see is gonna be epic... 5-10 years from now there will be intelligent robots all over society.
@Aspiiire9 ай бұрын
This is truly the future of technology! Exciting times ahead for Figure and its CEO, Brett Adcock. Can't wait to see the impact they will have on the world!
@Konami99999 ай бұрын
4:55 why are there bananas lying around
@raenico52859 ай бұрын
How do you build regulation for a product like this? How do you regulate the safety of a machine that will be in my home interacting with almost everything?
@gentlebabarian6 ай бұрын
Money
@ач1р9 ай бұрын
Dishwashers are likely to lose their jobs 😢
@cooliipie9 ай бұрын
That's a fancy way to say Women
@glenns35289 ай бұрын
Who’s sad about that? I just love washing dishes
@willwimbiscus74569 ай бұрын
I'm excited for this I'm a dude who has to do all my families dishes, I've always wanted to just have some robotic arms come out of the side of the sink and do them lol
@halos41799 ай бұрын
Ever heard of dish washing machine?
@f8talfury9 ай бұрын
Big things have small beginnings
@MADMAX73309 ай бұрын
I'm getting Elizabeth Holmes vibes 👀
@mnmlyt5 ай бұрын
💯
@aelion77619 ай бұрын
3:33 'can you put them there'? The robot was about to say, 'idk can I? But he realized he wasnt sentient yet.
@theybeonbody13099 ай бұрын
Lets the game begin
@Preston_Scales9 ай бұрын
may the odds be in our favor
@geoms62639 ай бұрын
@@Preston_Scales may the Robots have mercy on us
@ximenadelatijera9 ай бұрын
And may the odds, be ever in your favor
@JesusFollower5969 ай бұрын
SMH ya’ll slow, it’s just a video
@crisperu199 ай бұрын
People don't want these jobs because they do not pay enough
@WaldoTheWombat9 ай бұрын
4:35 That's Ironman's reactor
@ki6eki9 ай бұрын
Boston Dynamics just released their new humanoid robot, and Telsa is making one too
@ras76469 ай бұрын
And looking at movement and speed, Boston is way ahead. Then Nvidia are working on ways to train them, so the RnD here could be wasted cash in future if they are beaten at it.
@DaveBuildsThings8 ай бұрын
@@ras7646 It's not always about the best. There's the affordability part to consider as well. Boston Dynamics does not sell their robots like Spot, they only lease them. Cost will always factor into adoption of the tech.
@ReflectionOcean9 ай бұрын
By YouSum Live 00:00:18 Humanoid robots revolutionize industries. 00:00:33 Entrepreneur Adcock pioneers AI-driven robotics. 00:02:24 Speed to market crucial for Figure's success. 00:03:56 AI training key to efficient robot functionality. 00:05:00 Safety and human-robot interaction vital. 00:06:24 Robots alleviate labor crisis, not replace jobs. 00:06:46 Collaboration with BMW accelerates robot deployment. 00:07:30 Overcoming technical challenges for widespread robot use. 00:08:24 Humanoid robots bring future closer, enhance productivity. By YouSum Live
@LionMemento8 ай бұрын
We are closely entering the terminator universe….
@financialconnectioninc9 ай бұрын
Why does a robot need to have a human form? Depending on the application, they would be more efficient using other types of locomotion and mechanical interfaces (mostly arms).optimized for their designed tasks.
@joannesmith11759 ай бұрын
It's because people think humans are made to look like god, by all means they can design a robot to look like a star wars robot like R2D2
@ZiplineFinals9 ай бұрын
The world we have designed and built up was designed and built up for humans. A humanoid robot is putting a square peg in a square hole
@snailedlt9 ай бұрын
It's easier to train humanoid robots because we have so much video and other data for humans and human-like motion
@jmoney46959 ай бұрын
@@snailedlt Human movement is quite complex (compared to wheels), or even dog movement (spot by Boston dynamics). Due to being upright, humanoid robots need significantly more actuation and degrees of freedom to maintain balance, particularly during complex maneuvers. As the previous commenter said, it is because the world is designed for humans - stairs, door handles, buttons (need nimble appendages), tools (all made for human hands). Can’t open a dishwasher without fingers, or use a sink very easily if you are not human shaped (upright, similar height, hands and arms). There is also the consideration of acceptability - humans are more likely to feel comfortable with something that kind of resembles other humans (the only other intelligent entities we interact with).
@jimj26839 ай бұрын
With a humanoid robot you only need one robot instead of hundreds of specialized robots. Heck, you don't even need a dishwasher or washing machine because the robot could wash by hand. Even a robot vacuum cleaner could be replaced by a humanoid robot with a $4 broom.
@pidginblock9 ай бұрын
How to start learning robotic and ai development
@AIHahb9 ай бұрын
Figure 1 is something!
@esko_______25229 ай бұрын
>Brett Adcock: we are only going after low hanging fruit, we won't take significant jobs from humans any time soon >also Brett Adcock: we are working with BMW on the assembly lines well done
@technician0069 ай бұрын
Plot twist. There's a guy with a mic behind the camera. LOL.
@AdamBechtol9 ай бұрын
:D haha (chances are..)
@teenytinytoons9 ай бұрын
After the 1000 Indians watching a video for the Amazon Store thing it’s very possible it’s all fake.
@LowkeyXxx6 ай бұрын
Do u know who was holding that mic? Bret the ceo
@dannmann179 ай бұрын
In 20 years, we’re gonna look at this and say how slow those robots are🤔
@15Stratos9 ай бұрын
Of course we will, but we can also say that now as well
@michaelmcwhirter9 ай бұрын
I applied for Figure, here's to hoping I get in 😂💪
@rabih19789 ай бұрын
Pre ipo or to buy a robot when they come out?
@Misplacedvter9 ай бұрын
What position did you apply for? Did you hear back from them yet? @michaelmcwhirter
@15Stratos9 ай бұрын
Honestly you should've applied to Tesla first and if you couldn't get in then apply to figure.But other than that hopefully you still get in figure!
@michaelmcwhirter9 ай бұрын
@@15Stratos I used to work at Tesla :D I find Figure slightly more interesting currently due to the fact that it is directly linked with OpenAI, however Elon did just raise a couple billion dollars for his humanoid robot Optimus so we'll see how things go lol Thanks for the support though! :D I cover AI stuff on my channel like these robots if you're interested. You seem knowledgeable in this area and having you as a subscriber would seriously be great 🔥
@tenzinpassang48129 ай бұрын
Business grad and worked on Wall St. before this? Hmmm red flag so, i went and did some digging. This guy had an EV avian company go public, ipo'ed with no revenue last quarter even though he no longer works there. Trevor Milton 2.0😂😂😂
@Laminar-Flow9 ай бұрын
As an engineer, I concur. You need engineers to lead engineering companies. Boston Dynamics for the win. Boeing is a great example of what it looks like when business majors lead engineering companies
@sproggs9 ай бұрын
@@Laminar-Flow What's wrong with Boeing? I ask this not out of sarcasm but literally from a place of ignorance. My understanding is that they're one of the biggest names in aviation and have done quite well for themselves, whereas Boston Dynamics recently shut down their last robotics project. My take away is that you could have a business major leading a business (of any kind) but they absolutely need a cabinet or advisor who specializes in that field and helps guide the CEO to make industry-specific business decisions. I also majored in anthropology so I'm thinking about this from a behavioral/cultural standpoint lol.
@andrewding7469 ай бұрын
@@sproggs Boston Dynamics didn't shut down their last robotics project, they replaced it with their newest humanoid robot. They just went out of their way to say goodbye since the old pneumatics based atlas was so influential. Boeing is facing a lot of criticisms lately for cutting engineering corners for profit. Their stocks are tanking while their planes fall apart.
@Laminar-Flow9 ай бұрын
@@sproggs Hear me out- I will do my absolute best to explain the situation to you. First off, Boston Dynamic didn’t “shut down” any of their robotics projects… They simply transitioned Atlas from being a hydraulic humanoid robot to a full electric humanoid robot. Only recently have servos/motors, and battery technology improved such that a humanoid robot can be full electric with similar performance. Hydraulics are immensely strong for their weight and that is why they started out with Atlas being hydraulic. The recent “farewell atlas” video they posted was simply a way to drum up media hype for their new full-electric model- check out their channel for the video of full electric atlas as it came out 24 hours later. The motion of the robot will tell-all in terms of the joints being electric, haha. Let me preface with the statement that I love Boeing- their military aircraft are badass. My grandfather finished his flying career (which began in WW2 flying a B24 Liberator) on the Boeing 747. I love the company and I think it is one of the greatest American enterprises of all time, but not in its current state. The simple answer with Boeing is layered, but I’ll give you my best summary: The A320 NEO was outselling the previous generation of 737 because of its more fuel efficient engines. That is the make it or break it metric today for airlines. Fuel cost is everything; it makes maintenance cost look trivial and it directly affects airlines’ profit figures. So, Boeing needed a 737 with similar engines. However, to redesign an aircraft around engines would require airlines to retrain their pilots for thousands of hours on simulators due to type recertification. This would be immensely costly for airlines, and would lead to bad sales on the new 737. The leaders of the company at the time made the decision to retrofit similarly efficient engines on the old 737 model. In technicality, this meant putting absolutely massive engines on the 737 and lead to the implementation of the MCAS system to compensate for the position of the engine air inlets relative to the wing of the aircraft. MCAS killed hundreds of people in multiple crashes (too technical for me to go into here, but you can research that yourself)… In other words, engineers would have disregarded the business implications of a full on redesign and done what is correct yet costs airlines more money, but those in charge of the company (business majors) decided to make the decision to avoid type recertification in favor of better sales numbers. Similar decisions are made at every level of Boeing by managers that don’t understand engineering (especially quality control), and it is far too dangerous to be okay with. As an engineer in America that graduates from an ABET accredited program, you are trained from the very first aero engineering (or other) courses about the ethics of engineering and about the consequences of choices like were made by the business majors at the helm of Boeing when it put out the 737 max product. It is a damn shame to see. Technical prowess, and understanding the math, probability, and physics behind engineering failures will never, ever take the place of a “cabinet” of engineers telling the CEO what to do when that CEO has the final say. Keep in mind though, more CEO’s are engineers than business MBA’s (look it up). CEO’s with business degrees are fine in technology companies because they specialize in making money, but when it comes to managing risk and putting out a safely engineered product, they are fully inept and are at risk of making decisions that could cost lives in the interest of profit like the leaders of Boeing did when they put out the 737 MAX initially. A cabinet of engineers isn’t going to cut it when you’re making aircraft that carry hundreds of people and the final say is that of someone who has no technical knowledge, only knowledge about how to maximize profit. I stand by this opinion, as do most engineers, and it is for a reason. Non-engineers simply don’t understand the risk associated with the decisions made by engineering firms and the sheer amount of variables in engineering problems that can literally kill thousands if not millions of people. In terms of the dude leading the company in this video, he doesn’t understand engineering in the slightest, yet that is the end-goal of his company’s vision- hard engineering. There are too many variables for his company to do exactly what he thinks in as little time as he thinks; that is self/evident to me as an engineer but clearly not to him. In summary, Boston Dynamics is far more profitable than this company is. It’s not even close; spot and Atlas (as well as military contracts) and their algorithms that have been developed since the inception of the company, are unparalleled by any company out there and this companies CEO will probably make similarly bad decisions (like Boeing) to match BD robots’ performance.
@Laminar-Flow9 ай бұрын
@@sproggs Hear me out- I will do my absolute best to explain the situation to you. First off, Boston Dynamic didn’t “shut down” any of their robotics projects… They simply transitioned Atlas from being a hydraulic humanoid robot to a full electric humanoid robot. Only recently have servos/motors, and battery technology improved such that a humanoid robot can be full electric with similar performance. Hydraulics are immensely strong for their weight and that is why they started out with Atlas being hydraulic. The recent “farewell atlas” video they posted was simply a way to drum up media hype for their new full-electric model- check out their channel for the video of full electric atlas as it came out 24 hours later. The motion of the robot will tell-all in terms of the joints being electric, haha. Let me preface with the statement that I love Boeing- their military aircraft are badass. My grandfather finished his flying career (which began in WW2 flying a B24 Liberator) on the Boeing 747. I love the company and I think it is one of the greatest American enterprises of all time, but not in its current state. The simple answer with Boeing is layered, but I’ll give you my best summary: The A320 NEO was outselling the previous generation of 737 because of its more fuel efficient engines. That is the make it or break it metric today for airlines. Fuel cost is everything; it makes maintenance cost look trivial and it directly affects airlines’ profit figures. So, Boeing needed a 737 with similar engines. However, to redesign an aircraft around engines would require airlines to retrain their pilots for thousands of hours on simulators due to type recertification. This would be immensely costly for airlines, and would lead to bad sales on the new 737. The leaders of the company at the time made the decision to retrofit similarly efficient engines on the old 737 model. In technicality, this meant putting absolutely massive engines on the 737 and lead to the implementation of the MCAS system to compensate for the position of the engine air inlets relative to the wing of the aircraft. MCAS killed hundreds of people in multiple crashes (too technical for me to go into here, but you can research that yourself)… In other words, engineers would have disregarded the business implications of a full on redesign and done what is correct yet costs airlines more money, but those in charge of the company (business majors) decided to make the decision to avoid type recertification in favor of better sales numbers. Similar decisions are made at every level of Boeing by managers that don’t understand engineering (especially quality control), and it is far too dangerous to be okay with. As an engineer in America that graduates from an ABET accredited program, you are trained from the very first aero engineering (or other) courses about the ethics of engineering and about the consequences of choices like were made by the business majors at the helm of Boeing when it put out the 737 max product. It is a damn shame to see. Technical prowess, and understanding the math, probability, and physics behind engineering failures will never, ever take the place of a “cabinet” of engineers telling the CEO what to do when that CEO has the final say. Keep in mind though, more CEO’s are engineers than business MBA’s (look it up). CEO’s with business degrees are fine in technology companies because they specialize in making money, but when it comes to managing risk and putting out a safely engineered product, they are fully inept and are at risk of making decisions that could cost lives in the interest of profit like the leaders of Boeing did when they put out the 737 MAX initially. A cabinet of engineers isn’t going to cut it when you’re making aircraft that carry hundreds of people and the final say is that of someone who has no technical knowledge, only knowledge about how to maximize profit. I stand by this opinion, as do most engineers, and it is for a reason. Non-engineers simply don’t understand the risk associated with the decisions made by engineering firms and the sheer amount of variables in engineering problems that can literally kill thousands if not millions of people. In terms of the dude leading the company in this video, he doesn’t understand engineering in the slightest, yet that is the end-goal of his company’s vision- hard engineering. There are too many variables for his company to do exactly what he thinks in as little time as he thinks; that is self/evident to me as an engineer but clearly not to him. In summary, Boston Dynamics is far more profitable than this company is. It’s not even close; spot and Atlas (as well as military contracts) and their algorithms that have been developed since the inception of the company, are unparalleled by any company out there and this companies CEO will probably make similarly bad decisions (like Boeing) to match BD robots’ performance.
@kuhaniresti9 ай бұрын
why safety seems not being discussed here?
@ox_police8 ай бұрын
you cant show robot whitcable ?
@alfred82945 ай бұрын
No incumbents? Have these guys seen the Unitree G1 robot?
@Xx0GsaburzxX9 ай бұрын
2:52 False statement here. The incumbent is Tesla’s Optimus bot.
@CraftRavens9 ай бұрын
Please tell me the guy said thank you at 3:50, it’s very important to me.
@hansjmo9 ай бұрын
Cool robot. I feel abit like the reporter dont know what they are talking about when they show a cnc mill and says 3D printer 😅
@seanxie50977 ай бұрын
Tesla Optimus looks at least 5 years ahead
@SoggyRightSock9 ай бұрын
@4:51, why is there a Target bag and a pair of bananas on the floor?
@CrispyDaFrog9 ай бұрын
this video sounds like the kind of thing that would play on the radio in a dystopian post-apocalyptic world
@Orionbae9 ай бұрын
Detroit Become Human is starting to look a little too real now 👀
@billy36039 ай бұрын
It was REFRESHING to see the people who are profiting from this business tell me that I have nothing to worry about when it comes to my job. Even then.. they said not yet lol. Also they didn’t really do this guys back round justice. “ He grew up on a farm and went to college, now he walks on water..” Like what? How did he do these things???
@marwluka9 ай бұрын
It will (and not only robots , but AI in general) destroy multiple branches of industries. In some of them employment will be much lower. But this is what is happening all the time. Did industrial revolution made us all unemployed? No , you will just adjust to new realities , maybe find something different.
@omniopen9 ай бұрын
I think that in the long run robotics will be able to do most tasks and help grow the economy, but there are still significant issues that need to be overcome. Similar to how self driving isn't ready yet, I am doubtful that there has been the advancement with respect to the intelligence systems needed to really make these things worth their high cost to operate and maintain. It's my guess that Figure is applying a Tesla-like approach, the one that they've used for self driving and applying it to robotics. They collect a massive amount of data and fit expensive models to try and replicate behavior that is in principle very basic, but there seems to be limits to how good these systems can get. The hardware looks great but I think $750 million dollars is just too much to pump in without any output, the demo video was reassuring but I've personally built a robot arm that could work like this if I put a ChatGPT command interface on top of it. Just saying, also I don't trust business majors to run tech companies, but maybe I'm biased.
@joemclaughlin56619 ай бұрын
After more than a hundred years of people dreaming of robots doing jobs alongside people that dream is now closer than ever! I don't know if the humanoid robot in every home idea will work well with a 6 foot 2 hundred pound giant in a small home or apartment, but labor robots in factories and warehouses will be awesome to see.
@LegBuilder9 ай бұрын
You can thank rob Lowe for voicing the robot
@monkey_man39319 ай бұрын
Exactly 😊
@Srindal46579 ай бұрын
There should be a law that if a private or public service has an opportunity to hire a human, they should take it. It doesnt eliminate the potential for robots, just uses them when its absolutely necessary. Robots should be supplemental, not a priority.
@Observer1689 ай бұрын
It could all be staged, everything is scripted and the video could have been shot hundreds of times until they got something satisfactory
@pennryan9709 ай бұрын
haha this person at 1:34 is rolling their eyes at their colleague
@CK-wo1ly9 ай бұрын
It's going to be "pretty magical" for those making & selling the robots. Not so much for those being told to "accept your lower wage and be grateful because a robot could do it for much less, faster, and longer". Bear in mind at some point robots will build factories that manufacture more robots. And then we will see power and wealth concentrated in the hands of few humans like never before. Apart from that though, I think it's neat. 😉
@Sillingrex9 ай бұрын
Altas will always be ahead, when it come to movement.
@Eudemoni_8 ай бұрын
I miss a time not that far ago when Daft Punk were the only humanoid robots in da place...
@raz96129 ай бұрын
A man with a business degree (not a STEM degree) founded a robotics startup, impressive....
@MysticSage-hg3jh9 ай бұрын
Yes Take All Our Jobs. Just have 1000 Billionaires and Robots
@AmorFatiistaken7 ай бұрын
Universal basic income
@xXxSkyViperxXx3 ай бұрын
@@AmorFatiistaken if only there is a realistic livable path to that.
@AmorFatiistaken3 ай бұрын
@@xXxSkyViperxXxwhen ai and robotics replace the work force we will have that
@xXxSkyViperxXx3 ай бұрын
@@AmorFatiistaken will there be enough money for UBI to go around with all citizens? if it comes from government then it must come from tax money which comes from??? companies with ai and robotics??? then how do average people get more money? is it a choice between a life of mediocrity or trying to outdo other humans and ai and robotics just to get more money than ubi or the ubi is too few to even live off of or pay all the realistic bills?
@AmorFatiistaken3 ай бұрын
@@xXxSkyViperxXx yes there will be enough money. Money is a made up currency to buy goods. So as long as there is an abundance of resources that are produced from the ai and robotics there will be enough for everyone to atleast have their basic needs met. People won't have to work anymore so the economy does not thrive on people working and paying taxes
@MeNoOther9 ай бұрын
Wonder when we will find out his "father gave him a million dollars from some mine" moment? The same old "built company in a garage" lies these billionaires say as a beginning are not real
@azhuransmx1269 ай бұрын
2027 the boom year for humanoid robots.
@mattchancey32028 ай бұрын
What do we need these fancy robots for? My inflatable doll is all I need.
@raf259859 ай бұрын
10 million jobs that no one wants/ Translation: 10 million people that will be replaced with machines that can work around the clock and make the rich richer
@reecenward9 ай бұрын
Super cool, hopefully we use them to solve problems and not create them
@joeltotti9 ай бұрын
Boston Dynamics's new Atlas makes all other robots look like toys
@Lucas_Asher9 ай бұрын
"No incumbents?" Are you serious? This is one of the most crowded categories with enormous incumbents. 2:50
@duncanmaclennan96249 ай бұрын
Who? Boston Dynamics? What are the humanoid robot incumbents?
@Lucas_Asher9 ай бұрын
@@duncanmaclennan9624 For starters: Xiaomi UBTech Agility Robotics 1X Sanctuary AI apptronik Hello Robot Eureka Robotics Agile Robots Palladyne AI Doosan Robotics Boston Dynamics... etc etc etc... Then you have all the big companies that have been building humanoid robot IP since the late 1990's. Hitachi Honda Fujitsu Toyota Samsung. Then you have Amazon and other vertically integrated companies waiting to crush any upstarts. And last but not least, you have university professors with hundreds of millions that may spin out IP: Needless to say, there may be as many as HUNDREDS of incumbents. Not, "none"
@lamsmiley19449 ай бұрын
It’ll be interesting to see what Boston Dynamics comes out with considering they retired Atlas today. I’m sure they’ll reveal something new soon.
@drone-adventures18519 ай бұрын
They already did!
@lamsmiley19449 ай бұрын
@@drone-adventures1851 Yep, but they hadn’t when I wrote the comment. I did find the reveal funny, that was the creepiest possible way for it to stand.
@Killianstodghill9 ай бұрын
Robot, robot, what do you see. I see a little human looking at me...
@Thiloyeah9 ай бұрын
Sorry but I don't get what "Adcock" is doing in particular. How is his business called again? What makes this company so distinct to invest into, what's the difference to other AI manufactures like Boston dynamics etc.? What exactly made him a billionäre except the fundraise by big tech companies? It feels like you just need to hire some technicans and (ab)using open AI somehow to lure everyone.
@personaltrainermc9 ай бұрын
The real question is why don’t people want to do these jobs? It’s not because humans can’t or won’t, it’s because it is badly paid.
@HughsReviews9 ай бұрын
This is the guy that is giving robots AI brains. This combo will be our demise.
@jaidenBenzz7 ай бұрын
Great talk , thank you
@xclsd-c9l9 ай бұрын
30-50 years? We already have robots woprking in warehouses etc. I think the impact will already happen in the next 5 years
@dontaestarks75179 ай бұрын
What’s the stock I need to invest
@aditya_on_youtube9 ай бұрын
Don't. This guy doesn't seem legit.
@EcomCarl8 ай бұрын
Impressive advancements in humanoid robotics by Figure! 🤖 Collaborating with companies like BMW to automate tasks can significantly alleviate labor shortages and enhance productivity in various industries.
@PacoOtis6 ай бұрын
GRAMMAR! At the 14th second the robot made a grammatical error using "you" instead of "your" so I think it might be a danger to society!! LOL Best of luck and thanks for sharing!
@GaryMillyz9 ай бұрын
"10 million jobs that nobody wants" NOBODY, you say? I wonder if the millions of people desperately in need of a job- any job- would agree 🤔
@JamesRockefeller459 ай бұрын
If you don't have stairs in your factory your humanoid robots can ride hoverboards to be faster and more efficient.
@wez1231231239 ай бұрын
So half the of people live in tents and are starving to death but we are all excited for a new dishwasher
@MRSketch099 ай бұрын
That was pretty impressive. But I don't believe we have a "labor shortage",... but I believe putting these bots out there will DEFINITELY cause a labor shortage.
@joshbergemann54989 ай бұрын
Closed Ai. When this company started they were very humble. Now after a few govt contracts, They're trying to make a soldier.
@kuo-yingwang22739 ай бұрын
It is very inspirational to see Brett has been able to think outside of the traditional boxes, and make big strides in making humanoid robtos. Please try not to kick your robots like demos been done by some other companies (BD, etc). There are plenty of ways to proof the stability of the bots.
@Womblewobble13219 ай бұрын
Give me your clothes, boots and ledger.
@josejose-t2z9 ай бұрын
People just don't know but the rulers of this earth have technologies like 300 years in advanced this is old, ancient
@skinnynicci9 ай бұрын
great interview.
@lenardosbornsjustice59485 ай бұрын
This is Roswell folks. Small steps we’ve all witnessed through out our life’s.
@Evaultfinancial9 ай бұрын
What’s next? Mass production to replace human labour or does this mean prepare for I AM LEGEND II 😂
@JShaker9 ай бұрын
if that plate was made in anything but plastic it would have made a loud bang and possibly chipped it
@asimkasir9 ай бұрын
Another A.I Robot being assisted by 100 indian agent😂 😂😂😂😂
@Jontheinternet9 ай бұрын
We were also promised we would work less when we got the PC. Instead we became multitudes more productive and our wages have not increased. They won't go and replace us and then pay us to do so.
@TalesOfTrillions9 ай бұрын
How do we ensure these AI-powered beings don't replace human jobs entirely?
@jacksonvaldez59119 ай бұрын
We want them to replace jobs
@TalesOfTrillions9 ай бұрын
@@jacksonvaldez5911 but how will people sustain themselves then?
@trevorashala94249 ай бұрын
Getting Sbf vibes here.These guys all talk the same way I guess I have to speak like that to excel
@full__tilt9 ай бұрын
Tesla’s Optimus is the only bot IMO will be in every home.
@TeddyLeppard9 ай бұрын
Impressive compared to some others in development, but compared to Tesla's robot, it's seriously lagging.
@jaredmotopnw9 ай бұрын
What about people who love doing what they do, and can’t find those jobs anymore?
@robertcornelius35149 ай бұрын
An employee who is a spy will be this company's downfall.
@crypticTV9 ай бұрын
It walks like Joe Biden 😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@manilkasheran29349 ай бұрын
Boston Dynamics didn't bring *Atlas* to market because they know that there's still so much to figure out with humanoid robots! They instead focused on much more useful robots like *Spot* and *Stretch.* I think that's where the business side of robotics is. Human form is too inefficient in doing longer and heavier tasks! This robot just seems like a very expensive toy although BD's new revelation seems much more promising than this and the Tesla bot!
@kukiiiiiii9 ай бұрын
Imagine working for weeks on this video just to notice that two days after releasing it Boston dynamic reveals the new atlas hahaa
@AtaiKydyrov9 ай бұрын
Imagine if they will work together with Boston Dynamics
@ximenadelatijera9 ай бұрын
Forbes has the worst track record (SBF, Elizabeth Homes, WeWork dude) if they place this man on the cover, we’ll know it’s a scam
@Observer1689 ай бұрын
So true!
@canonest9 ай бұрын
agree. stop being a luddite. learn new skills. build robots, let them work for you.
@Retirewithswan9 ай бұрын
Please! Just create one robot that can fold and put the laundry away without killing anybody!
@instantpartyWTF9 ай бұрын
"with cups and a plate" he meant with plates and a cup.
@FranciscoCaro-k9u9 ай бұрын
We need more farmers than engineers. Trust me on that one.