F-15E vs. F-15EX: Technological Differences Explained!

[@reinhardtrossouw1879]

This video doesn't really say anything new. Old news, skims along topics without going into depth.

[@bobdillon1138]

Its a classified military aircraft they don't want the opposition knowing too much about it.

[@balancedaccounting2332]

reinhardtrossouw1879 Maybe you could make a better video?

[@reinhardtrossouw1879]

@balancedaccounting2332 maybe if I do, I'd give some useful info instead of skimming over them. Check out Sandboxx's Airpower videos - you'll see what real information looks like.

[@norizammastor9072]

​@@balancedaccounting2332smelled cookin..

[@Danger_us86]

Yeah but they still got 55,350 views from their “overview”. 😂

[@MrMinuteman69]

It is a fast missile truck. The F35s go in ahead of it. Find the targets and share that data with the EX. Then the EX can launch its ordance at those targets from a safe distance. The F35 is the forward observer and the EX is the artillery. 😂

[@Ripper13F1V]

Not really. It can use loyal wingman 60 miles in front, but that's not needed for most air superiority missions. It makes the enemy commit assets to counter it for sure. It's the 800 pound gorilla in the room that you are forced to deal with.

[@blownufo]

The F-15E is powered by a Pratt & Whitney F100-PW-229, the EX is powered by a GE F110-GE-229

[@DavidSherman-m5l]

The F-35 requires other assets to go into the battle space with it because it wasn't designed to carry more than 6 missiles without giving up its stealth characteristics.

[@vc7393]

Which to me is just insane at the damn Cost!!!

[@reflexboxer2ndlt807]

It can carry 10 missiles in “beast mode” configuration.

[@ZionOrange]

One is a bomb bus the other is "Hello God, Its me Margeret" level of mayhem 30000lbs of funsticks

[@andreww1225]

F15E is actually more designed for ground attacks than air dominance.

[@SnowLeopard2121]

To highlight the difference between ABCD and E, we discuss the air superiority capabilities of legacy Eagles and E's ground attack role, though E’s mission also includes air superiority. With a powerful engine, high electrical output, a large advanced radar, and AMRAAM C7 or D missiles, the E is still highly competitive in air superiority, even against many 4.5-generation fighters. Those who make a point of distinguishing these roles often do so from a theoretical perspective. In practice, E is frequently deployed for air superiority missions.

[@reflexboxer2ndlt807]

It’s multirole

[@briancooper2112]

USAF needs to buy more than 122.

[@paulturner9958]

The UK should be begging the US to sell us this aircraft

[@balancedaccounting2332]

💯. Agreed

[@rossg4788]

That's more fighters than most NATO countries btw

[@briancooper2112]

@@paulturner9958 still needs to be done. F15e getting old

[@MauroTriques]

​@@paulturner9958eurofighter may be much better than F-15 XYZABCDEF...

[@jonronaldflores3007]

US F15 Eagle a true ACE fighter over 100 confirmed air-to-air kills with 0 loses👍👍

[@tomascastillo4676]

Fighting arabs.. Try to pit that F-15 vs a Su-35 piloted by Russians and that 100-0 score will fall quickly.😊

[@codfusilli5879]

​@@tomascastillo4676nope, "It's not the plane, it's the pilot" 😂

[@briancooper2112]

F15E replaced the F111

[@rayfujimori9833]

Amazed that at its age it still hasn't lost a dog fight. Goes to say the greatness of the aircraft and the training of the pilots.

[@WWeronko]

This video reminds me someone that read the manufacture's PR pamphlet and wrote a video without any real understanding of what they are talking about.

[@YouSayIT]

F-15E Strike Eagle First Flight: December 11, 1986 Role: Multirole fighter and bomber Crew: 2 (pilot and weapon systems officer) Engines: 2 x Pratt & Whitney F100-PW-229 afterburning turbofan engines Top Speed: 1,653 mph (2,660 km/h) Range: 2,423 miles (3,900 km) Ceiling: 59,711 ft (18,200 m) F-15EX Eagle II First Flight: February 2, 2021 Role: Multirole fighter and bomber, similar to F-15E Crew: 2 (pilot and weapon systems officer) Engines: 2 x Pratt & Whitney F100-PW-220 / PW-229 afterburning turbofan engines Top Speed: 1,864 mph (3,000 km/h) Range: 2,485 miles (4,000 km) Ceiling: 59,055 ft (18,000 m) Additional Features: Advanced Display Core Processor II (ADCP-II) mission computer, Fly-by-wire flight controls, and an open architecture backbone for easy updates and new capabilities The F-15EX Eagle II is essentially an updated version of the F-15E Strike Eagle, with modernized avionics, improved performance, and enhanced survivability features

[@bboystance514]

I see a typo error around 3:03 lol

[@cocomarsh1]

f16 ex?

[@bopitbull3957]

They're always is with these AI military programs

[@Military-TV]

That's because this video was made by humans, not AI, the editor made a mistake.

[@piney6438]

@@Military-TV acting like the whole video is ruined

[@ezepoliyu]

​@@Military-TVfeels like an AI made this script and video

[@keithallver2450]

Now we need an F-16 Fighting Flacon II.

[@reflexboxer2ndlt807]

What’s the the viper is for. I’m pretty sure all the falcons are now vipers. They just swapped the electronics adding electronic warefare capable

[@rickdemorgan8951]

Need to replace F16 with F18e&f Super hornets

[@mikeyplayzwrld]

@@rickdemorgan8951The F-18 can’t even do its own job good.. what makes you think it could take over one of the best fighters in history?

[@265justy]

​@@rickdemorgan8951The F-16 would whip the SuperHornet all day ...

[@roguetechpanda]

Warthunder now getting F-15E. Need that EX varient.

[@bryanst.martin7134]

Did you hear of the Israeli pilot who landed one with a wing blown off? He came in pretty fast and in the desert you can have long runways. He was puzzled at why it kept trying to roll to one side...

[@tippski5229]

There is video of that plane coming in for a landing. Incredible.

[@edutaimentcartoys]

nice footage

[@bryanst.martin7134]

That's what is often called "Bringing in a Ringer", an old fighting pro introduced to a locals only fight. This can be a flying weapons cache capable of Mach speeds. Give it a tailhook for even more capability.

[@briancooper2112]

F15EX wasnt built to replace F15E

[@dne9394]

But it can 😉

[@brettdemauna9994]

But F15EX does has twice doubled the capability than that of the F15E.

[@bopitbull3957]

They're not even making the f-15e any longer only f-15ex these are only being built on the New order what's the possibility of many more being built which is going to happen.

[@mustaphahabibi7694]

came back to make sure. yup, something happened all of a sudden. channel changed dramatically, and apparently im not the only one noticing this, videos views tell the story

[@alfredjr2k556]

E and EX models are the best digital version.

[@briancooper2112]

Israel should buy F15EX

[@leonressmann7594]

They already do.

[@briancooper2112]

@@leonressmann7594 no. They have a model based on E but with Israel weapons and avionics. Only USAF has bought Ex

[@Ptpd3370]

Israel has requested and been granted the F-15EX. Mostly new builds, but their F-15I airframes are also being upgraded to an EX standard (or as close as possible). Likely the APG-82 AESA radar and other avionics, which make the EX such a capable aircraft. They have the F-35A but as recent strikes revealed, there is still a place for the F-15 when stealth isn't a requirement...

[@briancooper2112]

​@robregish3367 i know. They are buying 50 i believe. Thanks

[@balancedaccounting2332]

briancooper2112 I’m sure they will or already have ordered some. Israel will turn into their own beast tho like they’ve done with others. They have some of the best fighter jets in the world with their own upgrades they do once they receive them. They also have some amazing pilots.

[@leeofallon9258]

Recall that we are deep into NGAD - 6; however, never put all the eggs into one basket.

[@Charles-um5hd]

There was a REASON why the F-15 Eagle was chosen to be Starscream, Thundercracker, and Skywarp in the 80's. Only thing better than it in air to air combat is the F-22. The F-35 is a joke and the Air Force made a HUGE mistake shutting down the assembly line for the F-22. As big of a mistake as the Navy retiring all of the battleships or the Air Force retiring the A-10. If the Air Force took the same approach as they've been doing with the B-52 we would be fine. If you're a fighter pilot you WANT to have 2 ENGINES when you are flying behind enemy lines so if one gets shot out you still have another to get you home. The F-35 only has ONE engine. Yes it may be a little more efficient but what made the A-10 irreplaceable was it's SURVIVEABILITY in the battlespace. It could take a direct hit and still get the pilot home in one piece. It is a flying tank. Of course nowadays MONEY rules the day and our military is more concerned about spending money on DEI and ASSUMING US fighter pilots will NEVER again have to worry about fighting close air to air combat dogfighting in the skies due to our reliance on high technology such as stealth where maneuverability and survivability do not matter. The F-22 and the F-15 airframes are and forever will be the BEST fighter designs EVER produced. An F-15 and F-22 NEVER been shot down in combat. They are the ONLY fighters ever built that can boast this. In air to air combat MANUEVERABILITY is EVERYTHING and how you survive as a fighter pilot to live another day. The bigger the surface area of the wing, vertical stabilizer, and flight control surfaces you have the more maneuverable you are which is the difference in winning a dogfight in air to air combat. If you look at how much surface area of the wings and vertical stabilizers there is on the F-15 and F-22 nothing else matches them.

[@peter-a.loesch1388]

The 15 EX is definitely highly advanced and will definitely prevail in any action served, but the Inventers of the future will always find new ways to come up with phantastic advanced solutions to the Air Forces and Naval Superiority to defend it's Airspace and provide assistance to the Allied Allied

[@vc7393]

I am not a pilot or an airplane engineer. I ask, why not try to bring back a new version of the F-14 ? We have nothing in the arsenal as a fighter with the swept wing technology allowing it to fly at such low speeds and high speeds. From the shows and documentaries that I enjoy watching, couldn't some stealth be applied to todays older plans, and isn't some of that in the paint applied to the plane, so why not the F-14. My feeling towards the F-35 is that the costs are a crime to the American people's wallet. Kelly Johnson would have been firing people in his days if such over runs would have occurred. I have known people who had the F-35 put on them to work on as the maintenance crews, and have retired because it just wasn't built to be maintenance friendly, compared to the F-16. Again, I say this and ask these questions from the out side looking in, but find it to be a fascinating field, and Thank You to all the Pilots from all the branches for all the rides you gave me while working in Afghanistan for 2 years in our Surveillance Aerostat System I installed all over the country. Thank you to all the troops who are a part of our armed forces.

[@Chris_at_Home]

The F-14 old and more complicated with swing wings. My son worked hooking up jets to catapults in the mid 90s and he said they are larger than the Super Hornets and they didn’t like them. I saw the first F-14s when they were testing them in the spring of 1972 when I was at Paxtuxet River, Md.

[@dennisdeckard2870]

I'd like to see them put 2 of the F35 engines into an F15 and see what it can do The sizes are that off

[@dickslocum]

F-35 engines will not provide the power the F-15 needs for its electronic and weapons hardware.

[@dengxaoping5031]

Stealth has it's downsides. And those are mitigated by F15 like 4+ gen platforms.

[@commonsenselogic]

Not really. They could just mount missiles on the exterior of both the F 22 and F35. And both would still be more stealthy than 4th gen jets.

[@mtrest4]

​@@commonsenselogic The poor flight performance and low agility of stealth planes is a big down side. Once you hang anything on the exterior of a "stealth" plane, it's no longer stealth.

[@markever234]

@@commonsenselogic ehhhh.... a bomb looks like a bomb whether its being carried by a stealth plane or not. Thats why they designed "stealth" fuel pods. I guess total radar return, you are correct.

[@commonsenselogic]

@mtrest4 What poor flight performance???? Stealth doesn't mean poor agility. Maybe you are thinking of the F 117. The F22 and F35 both have excellent agility. Yes, stealth is compromised with external weapons, but they will still have a lower RCS than non-stealth planes. So they are still more survivable. Regardless, what is the difference between a stealth plane load with external mounts and a non stealth plane loaded with external mounts? You'd be able to see both on RADAR. That's the compromise of putting a lot of missiles in the air.

[@dengxaoping5031]

@@mtrest4 No stealth aircraft (today) can match the firepower of a fully loaded F15, even when weapons are mounted under the wings.

[@mamdouh-Tawadros]

I am baffled about the rear vertical stabilizers being almost perpendicular to the plane. While it is said that tilted stabilizers reduce the radar reflection, i.e significant reduction in radar print and more stealthy functionality ?

[@scottcooper4391]

MONEY !!!! it takes money for doing the engineering to do that kind of change.

[@dickslocum]

That mod would increase stealth but it would require a full redesign of the airframe. Which killed the savings of using the Eagle as a basis for the new gen 4.5 aircraft.

[@PanioloBee]

Was wondering why the vertical stabilizers are not canted to help reduce its radar exposure? I saw a drawing with them canted. Just curious.

[@LeewardStudios]

Think you better check your dates guy. The Eagle went into service in the 1970s

[@mikeclement243]

The Strike Eagle came out in the late 80s the oldest one I worked on was an 88 and everyone always said it was a converted D model.

[@SJKile]

Yeah but…..inquiring minds want to know how the F-15EX compares to the F-22 Raptor?

[@kevincheney6628]

The GOAT

[@Ripper13F1V]

The comparison isn't a good one. The EX is replacing the C, not the Strike Eagle. C model drivers are staying with the air superiority mission, not adding multi-mission/attack too. They aren't learning to drop bombs or even using the conformal fuel tanks. There aren't any orders for the EX to replace the E's to be sure. One day maybe, and perhaps a good idea. The EX is a very good answer to counter the current crop of Chinese and Russian "5th gen" fighters. I don't really consider them 5th gen, their systems integration is light years behind. The Eagle II systems are really extraordinary in picking out these aircraft and either jamming them or launching long range missiles at them. They can be coupled to loyal wingman to suck in counter air and ambush them..

[@jtwilliams8895]

The F-35 looks like such an unimpressive, uninspired little fighter next to the F-15. Granted, Russia and China are basically creating their own knockoffs, the Su-75 and J-35, respectively. But it just looks slow and un-maneuverable. Doesn’t have those smooth aerodynamic lines.

[@ghostrider-be9ek]

a great video if you are 12 years old - popular mechanics magazines back in the 90s had better technical details that this hogwash

[@pharoahkingempire]

THE EAGLE FIRST FLEW 1972 NOT 1986

[@mikes7446]

Same Jet different letters at the end

[@mtrest4]

If India buys this plane for the 114 x MRFA tender, the F-15EX fortunes will sky rocket 🚀 with a host of options being added to its list. It will be fitted with a slew of Indian made weapons. These include 4 vatieties of Astra air-to-air missiles, 3 x Rudra anti-radiation missiles, an upcoming sub-sonic anti-ship missile (no not the Bhramos as Russia will not ok it), an EW jammer pod, a bunch of laser and glide bombs, at least one kamikazi drone, integrarion with the mini AWACS Netra 1, and much more. Later it may be integrated with CATS loyal wingman under development. Less likely -- It may get refitted with the Uttam AESA radar although not sure if it will be better than the US AESA radar. Hence unlikely. One reason it has a hard time winning is that India already builds a custom upgraded version of the Su-30MKI which has most of the above integrated onto the plane. A mjority of the supply chain ⛓️ has also been indigenized. The upgraded Su-30MKI also known as the Super Sukhoi, is way better than the new Su-57.

[@glennllewellyn7369]

Looks like the back end of a buss compared to an SU57.

[@bobdillon1138]

Because it is a weapons truck and the back end of a SU57 looks like a bus too.

[@grummanfanschneid]

Frustrating 4 me - Dick Cheney took Grumman out 4 calling him incompetent while he served under Reagan so we have crap from Boeing called bugs instead of a Modern Tomcat or something entirely different - Go Grumman - the Proud son of a Grumman Airframe Engineer recently deceased

[@Predator42ID]

The Tomcat was going to be retired regardless of who was in charge. Sorry but the F-14 was never going to last long in service no matter how much marketing Grumman did.

[@grummanfanschneid]

@@Predator42ID

[@grummanfanschneid]

⁠Predator - Not trying to sound like I told u so - the F-18 when it was first introduced by Northrop - No Body wanted it!!! Meaning not the Navy Not the Air Force & not the Marines - Next Grumman was called the Iron Works for a reason which tells me u know shit about Grumman - the Cat lasted 30 years the Intruder made it to an F series - the 18 called an AF is not that good at either as it can’t hold the munitions the intruder could - it still can’t fly as far as the Cat could and your beloved F-15 would fly apart compared to what the TomCat 21 was going to do - NEXT - the US govt was quite happy with Grumman - did u know in 1980 Grumman with the help of Hollywood made a movie titled: The Final Countdown - it had a dual purpose and achieved both - it was made to Promote Grumman to both Ronald Reagan and the rest of America after Carter nearly put Grumman outta business - Reagan loved the movie so much, he wanted more Grumman Aircraft on U.S Carriers not less - so a Grumman rep went to Washington- Was given a young Dick Cheney (A politician) and the Grumman Rep said to the Defense Department “I want someone different to Represent you as Dick does not know (Dick) about Defense Aircraft - Now if U read this far!! Dick was Immediately taken out and Grumman was Given the Green Light on Manufacturing - in fact they couldn’t sell their product fast enuf - so much so both Boeing n Northrop were both about to go belly up - Boeing asked Grumman to buy them out in fact but at the time Grumman bought Republic here on Long Island - Saved the A-10 for example and didn’t have the resources to buy out another company - With that Dick became VP in the Early 90’s - had a vendetta against Grumman - asked Grumman for an apology to which my father being a high level air frame engineer at the time sat in a committee of some 12 Grumman Staff and decided to tell Cheney - We are not giving You an apology - in fact Pound Sand - We make a Great Product that we are Proud of so what are we apologizing 4 - With that A cat cost 38 mill and you had a great piece of machinery and at the Time our Govt had a debt of roughly 1 Trillion Dollars - Today Boeing can’t get a contract thru - a plane to fly without falling apart and Dick shot his Hunting Partner in the Face while Nobody worth a salt in politics wants to go anywhere near his daughter but Lying Ko - Mal - La who added ov 4 Trillion to our Debt of 28 Trillion while raptors cost over a Hundred Mill as China hacked into the US Defense Department (An act of War) n Stole the Raptor n produced a Stealth Aircraft of their own - Yea you know what your talking About😋

[@paull4659]

You didn't say anything, nice pictures, that's about it.

[@fatdoi003]

an ipad and new V8 stuffed into the pontiac firebird.....

[@pikk2525]

Compare it with the C/D . Not E

[@amelintng8938]

Too little new information 😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@zepfanforever6502]

Fast weapons platform it will show up to the fight first

[@bobdillon1138]

No F22 and F35 will breach enemy's air defenses and relay targeting information to the f15 it will shoot its load well beyond the enemy's effective SAM coverage.

[@zepfanforever6502]

@bobdillon1138 the f15 I am simply saying flies higher faster than all of them. Not a 5th gen just a very very fast and big weapons platform. Stand off

[@TheBusiness11]

You had f 16 ex in there

[@joydasgupta9445]

Didn't mention radar & avionics improvement, mission computers just bogus video..

[@carlbyronthompson]

What is a F16EX? LOL

[@georgegrierson]

Did you see that, too? Oops.

[@maureencora1]

The F-15EX is More Bang For the $Buck$. A Great Makeover.

[@BeechSportBill]

…one statistic in the whole thing…

[@ArmanDMaceda]

why the F15EX are offer for the philippines to acquire atleast 12 unit

[@mtrest4]

Don't think they can afford it, although that is the best plane for them. They are thinking more in terms of very short range coastal defence. They are considering 3 fighter -- F-16, Gripen, Tejas MK1A. All three have advantages and disadvantages.

[@90imlive]

Seluruh teknologi ketenteraan buatan Amerika Memang terhebat di dunia terbaik di dunia termantap di dunia 👏👏👏👏👏🇺🇸💪💪💪💪💪

[@AndyOrestesVazquezSantos]

LIFE USA ❤❤❤❤❤

[@KA4UPW]

Did this say anything of substance😢

[@ezras4216]

I think there is another technological key difference between the two - The Fly-by-Wire flight control system, which makes the EX version much more agile, while increasing its air to air combat capabilities!

[@manuelteixeira2496]

The difference between life and death is to believe! The true power comes from God Himself. with God everything is possible. It is written: " From whence come wars and fightings among you? come they not hence, even of your lusts that war in your members? Ye lust, and have not: ye kill, and desire to have, and cannot obtain: ye fight and war, yet ye have not, because ye ask not. Ye ask, and receive not, because ye ask amiss, that ye may consume it upon your lusts. Ye adulterers and adulteresses, know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God? whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God. Do ye think that the scripture saith in vain, The spirit that dwelleth in us lusteth to envy? But he giveth more grace. Wherefore he saith, God resisteth the proud, but giveth grace unto the humble. Submit yourselves therefore to God. Resist the devil, and he will flee from you. Draw nigh to God, and he will draw nigh to you. Cleanse your hands, ye sinners; and purify your hearts, ye double minded. Be afflicted, and mourn, and weep: let your laughter be turned to mourning, and your joy to heaviness. Humble yourselves in the sight of the Lord, and he shall lift you up. peak not evil one of another, brethren. He that speaketh evil of his brother, and judgeth his brother, speaketh evil of the law, and judgeth the law: but if thou judge the law, thou art not a doer of the law, but a judge. There is one lawgiver, who is able to save and to destroy: who art thou that judgest another? Go to now, ye that say, To day or to morrow we will go into such a city, and continue there a year, and buy and sell, and get gain: Whereas ye know not what shall be on the morrow. For what is your life? It is even a vapour, that appeareth for a little time, and then vanisheth away. For that ye ought to say, If the Lord will, we shall live, and do this, or that. But now ye rejoice in your boastings: all such rejoicing is evil. Therefore to him that knoweth to do good, and doeth it not, to him it is sin. James: 4. The Angels Commander and Lord ask for Lawful deeds. In His Presence there's peace. I have decided to put The Lord God Almighty first in my heart, moment by moment, today, everyday. " He that loveth not his brother abideth in death. Whosoever hateth his brother is a murderer: and ye know that no murderer hath eternal life abiding in him. Hereby perceive we the love of God, because he laid down his life for us: and we ought to lay down our lives for the brethren. But whoso hath this world's good, and seeth his brother have need, and shutteth up his bowels of compassion from him, how dwelleth the love of God in him? My little children, let us not love in word, neither in tongue; but in deed and in truth. And hereby we know that we are of the truth, and shall assure our hearts before him. For if our heart condemn us, God is greater than our heart, and knoweth all things. Beloved, if our heart condemn us not, then have we confidence toward God. And whatsoever we ask, we receive of him, because we keep his commandments, and do those things that are pleasing in his sight. And this is his commandment, That we should believe on the name of his Son Jesus Christ, and love one another, as he gave us commandment. And he that keepeth his commandments dwelleth in him, and he in him. And hereby we know that he abideth in us, by the Spirit which he hath given us." I John 3: 14 - 24. Glory to Jesus Christ. Alleluia.

[@martincavanagh8308]

Boring 😴

[@tanhy1522]

Why f15 some sit one person some sit two?

[@salguy]

The original F15a, through the C Model, were strictly fighters, pilot only. The Strike Eagle required a WAO, weapons system officer due to its strike capabilities. The new EX can fly with either the pilot or the pilot and a WSO.

[@rinantoichwan757]

Plus X mean experimental

[@markever234]

If the X came after airplane type designator you would be correct..as in " FX-15 " or just "X-15"; however, the X (in this case EX) comes after the model designator.. the EX is the variant/version number. F (Airplane type - Fighter) 15 (model number) EX (aircraft version) Eagle II (Name)

[@TheScotsmen1]

What is the F-16 EX?????? the EX is build off the S Saudi Arabia

[@MaxKrumholz]

EX cost to much go plane of no need capabilities from 60-s - for now far behind 5 Gen

[@briancooper2112]

Israel F16 are getting old

[@michastaneke2791]

Not very impressed by this information. Somewhat dissapointing ,this

[@tommypaget2294]

One is an air superiority fighter……..the other is a multi-role fighter aircraft……two different types of aircraft.

[@tonicardoso380]

This video is very superficial

[@williampomplun6750]

Waste of time!

[@ThatsGot]

❤❤😂😂🎉🎉🎉😢😢😢😮😮😮😅😅

[@ณรงค์ดีสมบัติ-ห5พ]

พาบ

[@StevenBegay-e2v]

SINCE NO PLANS FOR RETIREMENT OF THE F-15EX EAGLE 2 MAYBE US MILITARY WILL BRING BACK THE F-14 TOMCATS AS WELL THERE STILL HAS THE POWER TO DO IN COMBAT

[@peterlesicko3911]

👍

[@dne9394]

The USAF needs Aim-174s. 200 mile missiles.

[@briancooper2112]

First F15E was lost in 1991 war.

[@mmsk2010]

junk ai voiceover.

[@qq-uh2mx]

I like all model of F-15 EAGLE from F-15 C to F-15 E SRAKE EAGLE. This is fun to see new F-15 EX. For me is F-15 EAGLE GREAT OF GREATS AIRCRAFT ALL TIME. THE BEST OF THE BEST No-1.🥰🤠😎🦾🦾💪👍👍👍👍👍👍🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🗽🗽🗽🗽🏆🏆🏆🏅🏅🎱🎱🎱🎱🎱🎱💻🖥📀💿

[@hukedonfonix1671]

I Call the F-15, E.S.A.D, Extremely Sexy and Deadly, the F-15 has set the bar for modern fighters as we know it. From day 1, it's power to weight ratio, vertical climb capabilities, can engage in aerial as well as ground targets, has the capabilities of carrying enough weapons to down multiple aircraft and multiple ground targets like SAM sites and radar compounds. Like the -14! It's big, it's fast and to its adversaries it's deadly AF, if you give a Russian pilot a 10lb chunk of coal, tell him an F-15 has identified and is now engaging him, that Russian will turn that 10lb chunk of coal into a 10 karat flawless white diamond faster than it takes the F-15s pilot to release an air to air missile

[@zepfanforever6502]

@@hukedonfonix1671 exactly 💯 i

[@cliffordjones9715]

The F15EX Eagle 2 has GE F110 GE 129 EFE engines EFE Stan's for enhanced fighter engine tha make 34.500lb of thrust that's a fact because every single pilot said those GE engine had more thrust tha Said it had over 33.000lb when I seen what GE said they were putting only EFE engines in the F15EX Eagle 2 tha make 34.500 lb of thrust in all of them F15EX Eagle 2