Andrew. The best I found was at about 55 to 60 mm at a 1550 gram total weight. Back of this and it would almost always roll left on a hand launch. I read this is from the CoT being behind the CG. Might be wrong but made sense and no more launch failures for me lately.
@SladkaPritomnost7 жыл бұрын
Great experiments, much appreciate Andrew thanks for sharing.
@AndrewNewton7 жыл бұрын
It's a great little FPV platform, worth all the experimentation.
@upperechelon34562 жыл бұрын
Great video Andrew. Mine [mini talon] is pre-marked at 90mm my flying weight came out to 1419g with a 4s 3.2 lipo. I installed landing gear.
@AndrewNewton2 жыл бұрын
Nice setup Jason. Still flying mine now, with INAV and DJI FPV.
@spencerboaz23857 жыл бұрын
I'v been subscribed for a while now , and I'm mostly a hex and quad guy but I'v learned so much from your channel , just like to say thanks Andrew . Still working on my scratch build plane .
@AndrewNewton7 жыл бұрын
Very good of you to say it Spencer, many thanks
@NOXFPV3 жыл бұрын
Thanks. Building mine now.
@GroundControlRC7 жыл бұрын
Nice experimentation on the CG location. I usually try to find my CG, take it outside and give it a good toss and see how it glides for CG determination. I guess if I ever change the weight significantly I need to re-calculate. Happy Flying!
@AndrewNewton7 жыл бұрын
Glide test might not be the best for overloaded planes I guess
@EnglishTurbines7 жыл бұрын
I know on the servo wires is a bit nose heavy Andrew, but there is some logic behind it I think....Since this is a distance machine, a lot of people like to see just how little throttle they can fly it on...If the plane was set more tail heavy, the danger of entering a stall and spin would be so much greater and if you are kilometers away, that's bad news. It would be interesting to load her up with a typical 8amp 4S and see how far back you can set it then, but remember, you have to sip the amps with minimum throttle whilst all the time keeping it away from the stall....and a lot of pilots dont always have the benefit of an ASI. I think also the glide angle is a more valuable measure of success perhaps...? On the servo wires may give more gliding distance from a set height than a more rearward conventional CG? It likes to fly fast.
@alasdair41616 жыл бұрын
Great video Andrew. It's also interesting to measure rate of clime with respect to elevator trim setting at a given motor current value. Once CG is optimised it seems to climb much more efficiently with less up elevator, as do most pusher planes with a good thrust line. I always use this technique as a way of tuning best efficiency, rather than just trying to minimise straight and level current and be feeling around for the edge of stall speed, for those aiming for maximum range etc, there is a speed window there that allows for safer max efficiency cruising rather than just hanging around at minimal speed but it's really a mix of all three, attitude (trim), CG and thrust. Thanks again, good info.
@AndrewNewton6 жыл бұрын
Interesting, you're tuning to a finer degree.
@kevinlane7 жыл бұрын
Thanks Andrew CG issues probably explain why mine is currently in a 350 acre 10ft high maize field. Your final comments were also enlightening neither did I realise that it had wing clamp screws, no wonder they were so difficult to close up to the fuselage 😁
@AndrewNewton7 жыл бұрын
Oh no, it will show up when they cut the maize I guess!!
@stephengloor84517 жыл бұрын
Needs quad motors 😀. Hopefully after this weekend I will have some MiniQuadTalon videos to post. Transitioning is always fun.
@AndrewNewton7 жыл бұрын
It will be fascinating
@kabturek7 жыл бұрын
great video! the biggest problem with a heavy setup and cg at more than 60mm is the launches - for a 1.6-2kg (or more - someone at the FB group said he uses 4s5p liion!) it needs a lot of force and stalls easy (and torque roll from the motor is bad) - the launches have to be "perfect". I'm happy with 60mm cg - it cruises at 4-5a and with a 4s 5.2ah gives me 40 minutes of flight (could fly more but 40 minutes its my limit xD)
@AndrewNewton7 жыл бұрын
Thanks Chaps, that makes sense
@taqyon7 жыл бұрын
Wow I didn't know CG needs to change with a heavier setup. Explains why the Skywalker manuals are so "off". Will you consider loading it up and see how much weight you can launch with and then see how the CG is affected?
@AndrewNewton7 жыл бұрын
Yes looks like I'll have to try that
@unixoid33 Жыл бұрын
So with all up weight about 1.5-1.6kg, optimal CoG shoul be about 60mm from the leading edge?
@AndrewNewton Жыл бұрын
Yes according to RCGroups discussions, but mine is lighter and CG at 70mm. Have to try it yourself
@kasatka60 Жыл бұрын
Спасибо за видео.
@AndrewNewton Жыл бұрын
No problem, it was fun to do
@iforce2d7 жыл бұрын
70mm is exactly where I ended up too. All my flights so far have been around 1.6kg
@AndrewNewton7 жыл бұрын
Excellent, glad I'm not the only radical
@smoothvirus7 жыл бұрын
I keep mine right about 55mm
@kartherton7 жыл бұрын
You know what i am going to ask Andrew, will it slope? 😀👍
@AndrewNewton7 жыл бұрын
Of course it will Keith, hopefully this weekend
@wdonno7 жыл бұрын
Hi, Can you post a link to the board thread on this topic?
Nice review. When I was flying mine, I made sure to give it about 5mm of reflex in the ailerons. That seems to tone down or smooth out its flight characteristics. I have tape my entire plane and pretty much used the power setup I've used in my Bixler. Inefficient 2200kv motor 2200mah and 40amp esc. Had to use some ballast on the nose to balance out the plane; wanted to keep the weight down ad much as possible. My AUW is 43oz. I have pictures on earlier on the Rcgroups. I'm one of the first one who have added flaps on mine. (G-LO)
@AndrewNewton7 жыл бұрын
Oh yes I saw your flap mods, nice one.
@voldelurubu6197 жыл бұрын
Interesting as I'm finishing my first mini Talon...
@AndrewNewton7 жыл бұрын
Great plane. Mine is a light weight so the CG can be back further than most pilots have it.