"Misquoting Muhammad" by Jonathan Brown | Challenges of Understanding Sunnah | Review

[@alib7489]

He basically looks like a younger version of his dad Masha Allah.

[@Flower-qq7je]

Son and Father together! Mashaallah !

[@asifulovi4673]

"Those who do not judge according to what Allah has sent down, they are the unjust." Quran, 5:45. Those who say God's law can not be applied in modern days are lacking faith. May Allah forgive us.

[@booksbrains1249]

Jonathan brown is a great scholar , i take his every word seriously. ..

[@acogjefe4769]

No he’s not. He said he supports people’s right to insult Muhammad SAW

[@f3nt0]

Thank you so much for this video. I love the interview and the guest has described and analysed the book objectively, very well. I was considering buying it and will buy it now. Other people need to realise that Dr Shabir Ally isn't giving his opinion, he's saying what Jonathan Brown wrote.

[@BrokenMuslim]

Masha'Allah! Is this Shabir's son? Al-Hamdulillah.

[@52hogg]

What's with you name?

[@52hogg]

Khurshed 205 is the lady that was on the show his sister

[@autumnicleaf]

How would I know? He is not asking for money and getting yelled back at.

[@charlielucky3186]

God bless you such a noble family may Allah guide us to the right path

[@KaanfitnessUk]

I loved this book but I had the same issue, he never gives his personal opinion and leaves us guessing.

[@syedkazmi6487]

Both Dr. Shabbir Ally and Dr. Brown are scholars and as well students

[@whatdidjesusdo1519]

I appreciate your clarity Dr. Ally. Scholars like Dr. Brown are modifying Islam from the inside, similar to Majiid and Irshad. In a way, what Dr. Qahdi and Dr. Brown are doing is more effectively, because they are giving theological arguments from within the conservative tradition against violence. This has more credibility with devout conservative Muslims. However, I wonder what the founder of Islam, Mohammed, would think of this 'sifting.'

[@Danish-by8wk]

Shut up karen

[@mertmitm]

Nobody is changing anything about Islam. Dr. Jonathan A.C. Brown has never in any of his books or lectures that I have attended changed or manipulated any verse of the Qur'an. Dr. Brown is referring to Ahadith, which are prone to mistakes, which every single scholar and muslim knows. The Qur'an is a universally applicable perfect and complete source from Allah (s.w.t.), but not the Ahadith. Because of this, besides the problem of the verification of Ahadith, there also is the problem that the Ahadith were written in the 7th century in Arabia and are bound to that time, culture and the politics. Because of this we need to not only look at the reliability of an Ahadith, but also see what it was referring to and whether the Ahadith is still applicable today or needs an explanation. Even some Ahadith in Al Bukhari are contradictory and weak. Dr. Jonathan A.C. Brown is doing the exact opposite, trying his best to differentiate the strong Ahadith from the unauthentic ones. May Allah (s.w.t.) bless you and your loved ones in this life and the hereafter and guide us to the right path. Stay safe!

[@1eV]

But we have real scholars to defend our religion from these transformation by fake scholars. Their job will not be very easy

[@acogjefe4769]

@@mertmitmdr brown literally said he supports people’s right to insult Muhammad SAW…

[@standforjustice8799]

Even though I am not a scholar , my understanding of Islam and my experience tells me that there can never be a negotiation with the book and the teachings of the prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) , never ever , no way, no no no !!!!! We take pride in the fact that even though we had great empires , our religion did not suffer any changes and we still even after 1400 years follow the same religion taught and practiced by the best creation prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) and his companions. Islam in it's original form is the perfect religion until the end of the world . We will never negotiate with our religion!! Please remove the video and someone please go to him and ask him to change his point of view .

[@kanney98]

A good book review! May Allah bless Brown and Ally.

[@standforjustice8799]

You think we live in a bad time...the prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) lived in arguably the worst time of the human history , yet he(peace be upon him) never ever negotiated his religion even though he(peace be upon him) and his companions (may Allah subhanallah taala have mercy on them) were brutally tortured , some were even killed , and he (peace be upon him) himself was almost killed. Yet he (peace be upon him) never negotiated the religion. So how can we say that now we have a right to negotiate our religion? No way!!!

[@demonhunter8533]

You're forever living in bad times. That's b'cos the teaching the prophet gave was his own words, not God word.

[@abdulmryhan4668]

Look brother I fully understand where you are coming from but I highly suggest that you watch someone called mufti Abu Layth regarding Buhkari. The quran is 100 percent perfect because it was persevered by Allah. HOwever although imam buhkari and the many other scholars who are responsible for collecting hadith are incredibly intelligent and may Allah grant them the highest place in junnah there is no denying that there are hadith in buhkari that have been falsely attributed to prophet pbuh. Again I strongly recommend you watch mufti abu layths vids on KZbin regarding hadith.

[@abdulmryhan4668]

U can also watch videos on this channel by dr Shabir Ally and Sheikh Atabeck Shukurov on buhkari

[@mertmitm]

Negotiate doesn't mean to compromise. He also isn't saying that our times are bad as in that there's no peace, but that the Ahadith were written in the 7th century in Saudi Arabia and are bond to that time. They're bond to the mentality, culture, politics that ruled at that time. Our beloved Prophet (s.a.v.) was at the end of the day also a human being that lived in a specific period of time. Ahadith are not like the Qur'an, a perfect guidance from Allah (s.w.t.) the Almighty which isn't bond to a specific time. Ahadith in general are something that require more time and investigation, because we don't know 100% for a fact that these are a true representation of what out Prophet (s.a.v.) said and did. Even in Al Bukhari which is known as the most authenthic Ahadith book, there are Ahadith which are very unreliable and even contradict each other (one example would be the amount of time our beloved Prophet (s.a.v.) spent living in Mecca or Medina, the ahadith range from 10-15 years). Because of this it is really important to fact checkt Ahadith and trying to understand their meaning so that we can apply them today. That is what he meant be negotiating between our modern times and the ancient times of the Ahadith. Wishing you and your loved ones the blessings of Allah (s.w.t.) in this life and the Hereafter. May Allah (s.w.t.) guide us to the right path and give us knowledge!

[@ih10243]

I've come to realise that this person doesn't actually know anything when stepping outside debates with Christians. The reason why Imam Abu Hanifa didn't take the hadith of marriage without the wali's consent is that it is a khabr al-wahid, and there are other mashur and mutawatar narrations which go against it. Thus, the strength of it will not outweigh that which is greater. Not because, and I quote "because they look at the reasonableness of what they're gonna apply so at the end they come to something which looks good from all perspectives". Sure, there was 'contextualisation' but that with the Qur'an and Sunnah allowed using their own juridical methodology (usul al-fiqh). I'm honestly astounded at this! His drivel may be accepted by the lay masses, but anyone that understands fiqh or hadith will just laugh his analysis away. Allah guide us all

[@umarabdaziz]

Ikramul Hoque he is talking about the book. Yes what he said is a bit oversimplification but he might not want to go to such details in a short book review like this.

[@ih10243]

Umar Abd Aziz I disagree. I doubt he knows about these level of gradations at all, ngl

[@standforjustice8799]

Ikramul Hoque i agree with you and i believe most of the scholars of Islam will also agree with us. Our prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) came with a book and a lifestyle that is and will always be perfect until the end of the world. No need to add anything and no need to subtract anything and no need to negotiate also. Negotiating the religion is what the Christians did and now we see where they stand now , so far from the teachings of the Bible. We of course insaAllah will never let that happen to our religion. Thanks for your explanation of the issue of Abu Hanifa (may Allah subhanallah taala have mercy on him) .

[@truebomba]

This is basic knowledge, and I can't imagine scholar such as Shabir doesn't know that level of ijtihad methodology in comparing the tradition of the prophet. But I kinda feel that you don't know that Reason, manifested in what we call in Ossol al fi9h, Al-kyass (Measuring//Comparing) & Al-mossahaba (Co-continuation), is a source of knowledge for all Fiqh scholars besides Dahiriya. There are other sources of knowledge, for example in Malikit, the tradition of Madina society is a source of knowledge because Imam Malik estimates that those traditions are originated from the prophet. So to say an opinion in a matter, scholars do evaluate all these sources of knowledge (arguably in different orders) depending on the power of the proof of each of these elements. There are other reasonable tests scholars have set such as demanding mutawatir or at least strong narrating chain when it comes to public matters such as marriage or trading. This is the core idea of ijtihad, if Texts are clear there is no need to ijtihad in the first place. I advise my brothers to stop these allegations without proof or deep knowledge of the matter.

[@ih10243]

Agharabo Pardon me, brother. And Jazakallah for your comment. Please see that my comment details out the usul al-fiqh of why imam Abu Hanifa chose to disregard the batil batil batil Hadith - as mentioned by bazdawi and karkhi in the earliest books of Hanafi Usul. Though I cannot call my self someone of 'deep knowledge' - I have been teaching usul al-bazdawi (one of the earliest and most advanced books of hanafi usul) to a group of scholars for more than four years. I'm not a dhahiri and you're reading of my comment which considers the authenticity in transmission (Ahad, Mashur, tawatur etc.,) should have directed you to that conclusion rather than making that assumption. As we all know, dhahiris do not consider this level of contextualisation of the Hadith. One can only assume (please correct me if I'm wrong) that you are far from the expert your message seems to imply you are. P.s. Send me an email if you want to join my classes.

[@Alladin2001]

Some heretical views expressed here such as nothing wrong with Women leading the prayer.

[@Mohammed-nn3ts]

Trying to make islam cute.

[@irfanullahkhan9712]

thank GOD the host male here dear Let the Quran speak members plz tell the na mehram hosts to to cover her self properly i mean to cover their face too :) Salam

[@milliyetci5672]

she's not a wahhabi or salafi like saudi..... She follow Hanfi madhhab and according to Hanafi madhhab She don't need to cover her face, only hijab is ok....

[@gregoriysharapov1936]

Asking her to cover her entire or part of her face is against 33:59.

[@irfanullahkhan9712]

@@milliyetci5672 I know brother And I m hanafi too But as fitnah is increasing we should take carefully steps to safe guard women... Be careful about women Because women is not made for show off but to hide 😊

[@irfanullahkhan9712]

@@gregoriysharapov1936 u need to watch this video bro kzbin.info/www/bejne/q2nTcqN6ncyNgpY

[@irfanullahkhan9712]

@@Reconnectingwithnature yeah every women should exposed her self get naked ... U r telln me to lower gaze ... Sir u need to learn Islam from authentic scholars so that u know what u r saying 😊