Taking 1000 Steps In Every Smartwatch!

[@WaitWhatWho]

Fun fact: Nintendo made a Pokémon pedometer for a DS game and it ended up being one of the most accurate pedometers ever made lmao

[@Rockman-4]

And it even came with a pedo tracker too to avoid pedophiles.

[@joeljain10]

hahehihohu@@Rockman-4

[@WaitWhatWho]

@@Rockman-4 a very useful feature for kids!

[@Maze86753]

I love that, I have to wonder if anyone did a deeper look into why it panned out that way, really interesting stuff

[@xureality]

They've done that a couple of times now. The Wii fit balance board is one of the best scales around.

[@mkbhd]

Somebody had to do it

[@jace12345]

and i’m glad you were the one to do it ngl

[@joeljain10]

ayseri

[@an8nymous791]

I like tech but I prefer digital watches over smart watches.

[@UnknownTomorrow]

I noticed the less accurate ones were higher up on the arm. Was wondering if it was different between right and left, but that looked good. Only thing then is if the height on the arm made a difference.

[@sarhan_]

Why don’t you review other smartwatches?

[@xkrylo8002]

Google employee: "Okay, he said just walked 1000 steps, but let's not scare him too much, tell him 998."

[@iStayMelee]

lol they really tracked him

[@DaveMcIroy]

😅😅😅

[@ilearnwithritz]

Literally.

[@itwillbe508]

😂😂😂

[@Marc.Google]

Fact! ^^^^

[@iAyoub151]

Not them cheering like bro walked a thousand miles. 💀😅

[@spinnerlive]

Maybe they just added the applause sound.

[@leebliss3622]

Sorry he completed a small task correctly and has support, die mad about it or get some friends idk

[@mohammadahmed6319]

@@leebliss3622 damn bro your disturbed

[@silentcalibre1085]

​@@leebliss3622 u need help lmao

[@decker9911hg]

​@@leebliss3622imagine wishing death on someone

[@siddharthjali]

I think the pixel was just listening to your step count 😂

[@sirajkhan-bx5zl]

😂😂😂

[@bobdoodlesmerf7004]

@@ItzSlushiebro thinks hes the main character 😭😭😭💀

[@ItzAsap.]

​@@ItzSlushie🤓

[@trill3655]

@@ItzSlushiecongrats

[@yugimotobutjacked3231]

no shit, thats what pixel listening to his count means @@ItzSlushie

[@Pickachu_Melody]

The moment he said “1000 steps” the google AI listened to it and had already started working in the background.

[@whkn]

lmao apple doesn't use AI

[@mathmanchris666]

@@whknApple barely has any AI. As an iPhone user, it’s insane how far behind Apple is in AI. But in iOS 18 the iPhone is supposed to get a complete overhaul with AI features. Thinking about switching to android still

[@sko1beer]

@@mathmanchris666 iphone16 just got posted online it looks just like the iphone15🤣

[@rydextv]

At least the ai made me happy that ive bought a good watch and not being trolled

[@mrbasalt8553]

iPhones got lots of ai. Especially the camera.​@@mathmanchris666

[@jameslastname9171]

Now you have to move the watches to different arms and locations and repeat 3 more times. A Fitbit would be a nice addition

[@thefarex2641]

Yes the two best ones were close to the wrist and the two bad ones were close to the elbow

[@mehdiazad75]

Fitbit and Pixel are the same, Google is dissolving Fitbit in it.

[@nkeithw]

Google owns Fitbit..

[@mehdiazad75]

Oh yeah.

[@whatthecrit]

Agree. It's definitely not an accurate or informative test without changing these variables. Especially when the two more accurate ones were worn in the expected location on the wrist.

[@alex99398]

The Galaxy Watch, being 3 generations old, is holding up surprisingly well. The new Galaxy 7 will be unveiled in weeks so would be interesting to see if they've made tweaks to make it even better..

[@SuperMan-nk3td]

I got mine a month ago. Its super smooth ❤

[@jtg9110]

I was thinking the same. He used all newer watches but the Samsung was older and came in second.

[@Alge1-_-1]

He made a little mistake. It's a watch 6. Not a 3.

[@MandarrNNRU]

​@@Alge1-_-1 he should face the wall.

[@Ani0ji_x]

I have a samsung Galaxy watch 6 and tried this. It gave me exactly 1000 steps

[@kissykriss]

The fact that he used a old generation of Galaxy Watch proves that Samsung have the most accurate sensor of steps

[@EstaMorenikeji]

My Samsung Galaxy Active 2 Watch is always accurate. I like Samsung watches.

[@shivamguchhait]

I have nokia 3310 and tried this, Is gave me exactly 1000 steps

[@SofaKingA]

He'll rarely gives Samsung credit. It was very close as well. 🤷

[@bbriugbwkuhd]

For 9 dollars, that pedometer is way more vfm.

[@jsac3939]

The two closest to his hands were the most accurate.

[@OcRefrig]

Very Good point. He needs to re-do & change positions of the watches. Or maybe won’t make any difference if u think about a short girl with short arms. Watches should take that into play. A couple inches should not make any difference. ( theoretically)

[@Ricky-oz4ic]

lol no

[@topper156]

@@OcRefrigyou usually input height and weight measurements so it accounts for that, I think

[@topper156]

@@Ricky-oz4icwhat even are you saying no to

[@ackshayshukla]

Doesn't random shakes used to start counting in watch pedometer? Idk if it was true but jokes used to be made on that. I wonder if walking with stiff hands would affect the count.

[@freddyjason3142]

The fact that he’s able to take 1000 steps around his office/warehouse complex without walking past the same thing twice is insane

[@pineapplegamer6986]

What? He got to what I think is 60 steps from what I heard him count before the video cut to 1000. Still looks like a large warehouse but I doubt he went all 1000 steps in a one loop around his office

[@colin-nekritz]

It’s not all their own production space in Jersey, they share it with a bunch of other tech businesses, startups, and a business incubator.

[@freddyjason3142]

@@colin-nekritz well I figured that, but now I see how that sounded lol

[@freddyjason3142]

@@pineapplegamer6986 oh no, it’s not just his warehouse. It’s a complex shared with other business owners, but he also has two nice sized spaces. One where his office is and one where his storage is.

[@pearljam_1]

@@pineapplegamer6986 dude did you fast forward? I had to watch every step.

[@fcfdroid]

Bro was outta breath walking ☠️ I'm concerned 😂

[@mikaaa_0]

he’s probably just tired from saying all those numbers ever thought of that

[@fcfdroid]

Go to the gym. ​@@mikaaa_0

[@nerfgodbigguy1405]

Yeah ,he played Frisbee as a pro sport and you expect him to get tired of walking? He was probably exaggerating alittle for the video as well as taking a breath from saying so many numbers.

[@ProLaxDog]

Interesting how depending on where the watch was on your wrist, they performed in two different groups. The lower watches were very close to 1k while the higher watches were 950 range

[@AndreiMuntean0]

+1

[@Acconda]

he should have repeated but swapped them around to prove a point.

[@benbecker323]

Copium

[@mr_0n10n5]

That really shouldn't matter tbh

[@Katsu_ragi]

​@@mr_0n10n5 maybe if he had swapped them, we could have more conclusive evidence on whether it should matter or not.

[@iamdannyel3285]

Me walks 40 steps, Apple Watch; Alright you’re warmed up now, start walking

[@matthew.m.stevick]

fornite

[@McP1mpin]

40 steps? I'm 3/4 of a mile in before my watch detects that I'm walking and asks if I want to track it.

[@bassycounter]

@@McP1mpin I'm not sure on the specifics of how it works, I think that's just for the workout session's specific data (started manually from watch), it always tracks steps though regardless of whether or not you started a workout (through the watch). I'm guessing there's other extra data that gets tracked when a workout is triggered, but isn't always being tracked any other time (to preserve power and stuff like that probably) Edit: the watch can detect for movements that may indicate a workout, and so that's why it asks if you would like to start workout if you haven't already started one manually yourself

[@Agnes.Nutter]

it only prompts to start a workout if you’ve been walking 10+ minutes without an active workout session. then if you say yes, it’ll retroactively start your session when it thinks you began.

[@hundredfireify]

​@@Agnes.Nutterit literally missed 45 steps out of 1000 though. A 4.5% discrepancy is quite big, given that the pixel is cheaper with a .2% accuracy

[@Rockman-4]

Finally Marques finished his 2011's new year resolution. Walking a thousand steps. Congratssss wohoooo!!!

[@Presto_001]

2011!!! Damn, that has been 13 years in the making this video right here. Hence why they celebrated when he reached 1k. 😉

[@triple_a.a]

A thousand steps, a thousand likes, what's next😅?

[@TheDumontShow]

Which is the easiest thing to do. I do that regularly. Way past that regularly

[@Fx_Explains]

​​@@TheDumontShow it's a joke 😒

[@Pixiuchu]

@@Fx_Explains no its not!!!1!

[@mtejera]

I wonder if the position of the watches influenced the results. Interestingly, the watches placed directly on the wrists achieved the best results, while those positioned further away were less accurate.

[@micheeluzayisu3048]

We should give some credit to the cameraman too

[@thephoenixking3242]

For walking 1000 steps? That probably took, like, 10-15 minutes. Edit: The cameraman probably didn't even need to walk 1000 steps, he just went back to the studio after filming Marques start his walk.

[@SammyFash]

Bruh

[@Kazeno]

​@@thephoenixking3242i think it's less. i walk like 4,000 steps everyday going to the school and takes around 20-30 minutes

[@thephoenixking3242]

@@Kazeno yeah probably my first thought was 10 minutes and then i didn't want to be wrong and decided to ask chat got and it said 10-15 minutes.

[@broafka]

Why?

[@bountyhunter1007]

U should do it three times and then take average of the three runs 😊😅

[@klarityjoe7413]

pity the guy! 😂 no fat to loose on his body! ❤

[@bounce27]

No he has to do it 20 times, then average it and then he has to calculate the standard deviation. It's best if he did that with more people than just himself, as every person walks differently. Let's say like 100 people. And every person has to do it with different arm movements, like walking normally or having the hands in their pockets. Then you could really get some scientific data, if you want to do it that way ;)

[@rando_guy]

@@bounce27 💀my physics lab experiments be like

[@jaredcs3570]

Maybe walk around the Milkyway too

[@AaronNazzy]

@@klarityjoe7413gay asf

[@Zeenrialor]

That small watch was just motivating you by showing more than 1000 steps.. And you threw it away 😂

[@Artyomthewalrus]

It was lying to you and preventing you from hitting your goals. Undercounting is good, as it encourages more walking, and healthier outcomes

[@dr.pravinkumarsingh5957]

It wasn't a watch

[@c0pyimitati0n]

wait..do you think that pedometer is a _watch?_ 🤣

[@Studio23Media]

@@ArtyomthewalrusSometimes people want actual data and not motivation to reach a goal. 🤷🏻‍♂️

[@Artyomthewalrus]

@@Studio23Media I will agree, accurate results are the ideal. But perfect accuracy is often impossible, and erring on the side of lower sensitivity undercounting is generally better.

[@samuelmathai4843]

Basically the watches don't measure your steps, it Counts the natural swaying of your hands back ans forth motion to determine how many steps you have taken. Check it out bybainply being stationary and then moving the watch back and forth it will show Counts of steps even when you aren't walking.

[@sly2792004]

I always thought it did it same way phones do.

[@newyorkcity7154]

That is good. However, I think you should do it at least three times, then take the average to get more accurate results. 😅😂😂 to more left

[@workdesu]

you really were gonna make bro do this 3 times? 😂😂😂

[@cucumbermainline]

@@workdesu when the daily "recommended" steps is 10k steps, i don't see why not

[@camsaffari]

You probably mean 30-40 times to get statistically valid results.

[@reiokimura6519]

Alright, time for him to do a 10k steps for most accuracy @@cucumbermainline

[@daudiii]

best 2 outta 5

[@GhiKopera]

You can actually input your stride length on Garmin to get a more accurate reading.

[@Ivolo89]

You can do that on all of them I think

[@gingermcferren]

@@Ivolo89I haven't seen an option for it on my Apple Watch SE 2. My grandmother with a Series 9 doesn't have it either.

[@Ivolo89]

@@gingermcferren have checked if theres a setting for it in your app on your phone?

[@NicodemusChan]

@@gingermcferren You calibrate it by turning calibration setting on and going for a 20 minute walk outdoors.

[@bigboienfer4331]

“Yo bro what time is?” Him:* reads one number from each watch *

[@Saurabh-w8w8c]

*Takes out the phone

[@DanielSiemek]

I like how you avoided pointing out that Apple was the worst of the watches...

[@302daddyd]

It was further up on his wrist just like the Garmin. They were both off because of that. That will make the watch less accurate. The Pixel and Samsung were at the ideal location on his wrist.

[@Johnny91832]

This wasn't an accurate representation at all. Notice how the 2 watches closest to his hand were the most accurate,?

[@JamesShewfelt]

Acting like this is some scientific experiment

[@roozbehabbasi2497]

If you've been on YT long enough, you'd know this is mkbhd!

[@BlackWACat]

‘avoided pointing out’ i mean you can read, right?

[@windermere2330]

This old lady loves your channel! I love your videos and you make things interesting. Thanks!

[@NomusaMagical]

This one too! Been watching MKBHD since channel started. Grandson got me hooked.

[@ireallyreallyreallylikethisimg]

​@@NomusaMagicalthat's actually adorable. Stay young ❤

[@azharotaku5842]

Hello old lady we like his videos too😁

[@martinreceveau795]

This deserves a full video of its own

[@kneticnrg]

Agreed. Now I’m wondering how accurate the phone pedometer is, as well as other devices like the fitbit and more niche random ones like the 3DS.

[@rushabhshah.2768]

An 800 dollar watch performs the worst and a 250$ watch performs the best🤯🤯🤯

[@sidewinder3000]

Thanks for making. I noticed a bias in the experiment that might make doing it a second time helpful. The two watches that were actually on your wrist in the normal position (Pixel & Galaxy) gave more accurate results. To be scientific, I think it would be great to do the same walk again with the watches swapped, to see if the Garmin & Apple Watch get more accurate when they’re in the natural position. Just curious.

[@reubenpx1809]

Not really. Pedometers use accelerometers to count ur steps and sometimes gps to be more accurate. It is calculated based on inertia of ur hands and ur position, so all the watches were in good error margin. It was more unfair on the digital pedometer which he kept in his pocket coz it'll never give a proper reading there.

[@lordsluggg]

@@reubenpx1809I tried it, definitely makes a difference where on the arm it’s placed.When running 10km having it on the center forearm compared to the wrist throws it off by about 1500-1900 steps.Not huge but definitely noticeable

[@justnothing5488]

​@@lordsluggg I'm sorry but how do you know you have made the same amount of steps if you used distance as the reference?

[@elderman64]

​@@lordslugggPerhaps count steps instead of distance

[@jstocii8665]

Somehow, seeing Marques walking in time lapse to dubstep is so funny to me

[@RealNeonPlayz]

same lmao

[@ingridayarza]

It is 😂

[@ozmium1]

its dnb

[@jstocii8665]

@@ozmium1 brother...

[@harshalsangnale9090]

just realise how big the studio is

[@ridzalirfan]

right? his office is huge bruh

[@Castlee]

that speed walk is a potential meme

[@tripik426]

Yo why has nobody done that yet 💀

[@ChikaJihyo]

I KNOW RIGHT LMFAO

[@Shadoxite]

My dad when I tell him that I'm a furry (im not):

[@fhudufin]

@@Shadoxite what are you talking about

[@VinnytotheK]

Me when the bagel bites are done:

[@aquib91]

One thing I noticed, the more accurate watches were the ones closer to wrist and the ones higher up the arm were more inaccurate. You should do this again with the positions switched and see what happens. And then switch hands

[@zuhayrali4202]

In order to accurately assess this experiment, Marques should switch the positions of the watches. The Pixel and Galaxy watches were in the “normal” range of where you place a watch on your wrist. They were also the most accurate. The Apple and Garmin watches were higher up on the arm and also gave a less accurate count.

[@Henok-qn6nc]

Well, it needs to be measured a couple more times to clear out any bias

[@jsphcle]

This is pretty cool content Marques. You should do more of these comparisons

[@Ruuku1]

i wonder if the two higher up are thrown off by the location. The two closest to the hand were the most accurate. Id like to see it swapping the positions of the watches

[@jerry_mandarin]

I doubt that tiny difference had that effect

[@ganondorf66]

People with shorter arms are screwed then?

[@gabrielmanzano7375]

@@ganondorf66think it has more to do with bio mechanics rather than strictly being a height/arm length thing.

[@mohansiva1686]

Man I love all your vids. So articulate and to the point. Keep up the great work

[@JunicaviGames]

Galaxy Watch 3? Why not the 6?

[@IMHiiim]

bro he didn’t do the newest one for all of them. if you wanted him to do a 6 then you could of mailed him one

[@cspenceranderson]

@@IMHiiimlol

[@brandoncarvalho1592]

​@IMHiiim it's the 6, you can see by the size of the bezels

[@JunicaviGames]

How is the Apple watch ultra 2 not the latest? ​@@IMHiiim

[@MaskOfCinder]

He probably picked the most used smart watches.

[@DareDevilPhil]

2 variables (ignoring dedicated pedometer, although it still applies): - Device - Monitoring position on body For the watches, this means left vs right wrist AND either on the wrist or partially up the forearm. You could make a full video testing all of these watches against professionally operated and calibrated medical equipment on various different features (BPM, EKG, blood oxygen, body composition, sleep tracking, etc)

[@weltsiebenhundert]

Samsung&Google was right and left wrist. Apple&Garmin where higher than wrist so thats perhaps the prebkem

[@DFWsCars]

Agree the two watches lower on the wrist were more accurate.

[@merbudd]

Why would position be a problem if theyre all measuring based on distance and/or arm movement...

[@DareDevilPhil]

@@merbudd it'd be like sitting at the front, middle and back of a car. The suspension will feel a bit different for each one. The same way that the models on the watches will have been trained/tuned/tested for the typical wearing position.

[@RavikantRai21490]

The Quantified Scientist here on youtube does just that. Ultra detailed testing of these devices against very accurate, calibrated machines

[@nazeemmohammad2642]

Hell of a content creator. Even if I'm watching it from a $150 phone or the latest iphone. The sound quality and everything is top notch.

[@invictuz4803]

He's gonna be huge one day!

[@15sese]

Real

[@lincolnmarklt]

So lame.

[@PerfectPrinceX1]

holy glazer

[@adammontiel8425]

The two watches that were worn properly on the end of the wrist were the most accurate

[@linooosan]

Just ignores that apple was worst of them all lmao

[@LeSkinner]

Both the Apple one and the Garmin one has similar number and it’s because they were higher on the wrist than they should’ve been. This test would be much better made separately with the watches being worn properly. EDIT: Stop @ing me I really don’t give a shit if you can understand the concept or not.

[@theboxofdemons]

​@@LeSkinnerthat's not gonna make a huge difference. Arm length, stride length, arm swing, and watch positioning all vary greatly from person to person. More so than the difference of positioning an inch off. In practice, there could be some affect, but you wouldn't think it would be such a big difference. Technically, if there's any affect, if the user has longer than average arms, wearing the watches higher would likely increase their accuracy, and wearing lower would decrease accuracy. The reverse should be true for people with shorter than average arms, if there's an affect at all. I'd say he has longer than average arms, so you'd think if anything the watches higher up would be more accurate, if positioning affects accuracy at all.

[@LeSkinner]

@@theboxofdemons ​ coincidence the than both the garmin and the Apple Watch were the same amount of inaccurate while the other two were closer? 🤔

[@linooosan]

The watches are reading the vibration going through the body as you take each step, where you put your watch shouldn't matter at all, acually the further away from the feet the watch is located the harder it would be to read.. juat accept your apple watch isnt good at reading the steps

[@yunekoVT]

proof? or are we just saying shit on the internet again because we want to be right

[@felipeperez4556]

you should try it again but place the other two right above your wrist line. i think that’ll make the test better. i think these watches measure best when placed exactly where they are supposed to be. which is why the galaxy and the pixel had the most accurate results. I THINKK LOL

[@MichaelHawk42069]

@@Doom-iunfortunately I am too poor to buy 4 smart watches on a whim. But I don’t think it’s a coincidence the most accurate watches were the ones worn directly on Marques’ wrists.

[@honewhetstone1732]

This is a question I’ve always had, but never had multiple watches or the time to measure my steps separately from the watch. Thanks Marques.

[@threecouchpotatoes7695]

It may be inaccurate because of the placement of the watches on the wrist. Both of the watches placed closer to the wrist did better by a large margin. Switch the placement of the watches to see if the result changes

[@zeoz.]

That walking montage 😂

[@muhammadamnanabdulhafiz3313]

Im curious if the position of the watch on the hand plays a factor on counting

[@jofujino]

I am curious if he miscounted. At this point I trust the Pixel more than his count.

[@2nd-place]

I’m honestly surprised Apple is that far off. I feel like this should be a bigger deal, considering how much they push it as a premium fitness device. I guess they are pushing us to give 105% effort! I guess it’s more accurate with GPS used in conjunction, but what’s strange for me, it usually shows I burned more calories with GPS off just using the motion sensors. If it’s under counting using sensors, then why does it think I did more? Makes me wonder if there is a wide variance over in addition to under.

[@USA-66AOS]

Apple is just really good at marketing

[@IceBlueLugia]

Both the garmin watch and Apple Watch were higher up his arm and they were both inaccurate by 5%. My guess is there might be a connection. Not really sure why though. Maybe it’s detecting less arm swing overall since it’s higher up and it reads that as fewer steps taken? I have heard good things about the garmin watch so pretty odd

[@coolbrotherf127]

Apple over hyping products that are mediocre is pretty on brand for them.

[@nice900]

garlic?@@IceBlueLugia

[@user-ky1dw4fp4e]

@@coolbrotherf127apple's software covers up its average hardware

[@ceeceeclarke6130]

I love this TY MB👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾

[@MichaelHawk42069]

Do you think the Galaxy watch and Pixel watch may have been more accurate since you were wearing them directly on your wrist?

[@timealone7906]

No. The pixel truly is just that much smarter. The phones they make are incredibly smart and it's not hard to believe they would be the best at accuracy.

[@whkn]

@@timealone7906 for real, this guy just likes apple more

[@zandermc2928]

@@timealone7906 How much money are you making from endorsing products?

[@djundaground2007]

spoken like a true fan boy hahaha

[@toadlguy]

Maybe it is my stride, but every time I have tested any of the Garmins I’ve had, they have always been within a couple of steps. The slightly lower step count on the Apple is about what I have experienced, though. Not sure what is up with your Fenix. 😊

[@googleisgod963]

i like how the apple watch undercounts a bit it makes me walk more.

[@SolomonDurgam]

Nobody is talking how apple has the least accuracy 💀💀

[@OcRefrig]

Yea, I Saw that !!! Why is Nobody talking about this ? I was looking for this comment.

[@anianii]

Apple Watch doesn't even show the step count in real time. It might not have been displaying the last steps when he checked. I've done the same test before, then sat down for a few minutes before I checked and it was nearly spot on

[@mstiic]

Yes of course. Fanboys are active again and no one dares to be as honest as possible. Apple users are in shock and just don't want to believe it, even though they see the truth 😂😂😂

[@anianii]

@@mstiic I literally counted the steps myself on my way to school back in the day when I got my Series 3, what's wrong with me saying that in my experience it was accurate 😂

[@fkgaasdkjnv4824]

​@@anianii they didn't just write down the number immediately anyway so that "give it some time" argument doesn't work. Also why would a step counter not count accurately when the user needs it. U saying every apple user has to know that there is a delay for ther counter to work. Also how did the rest of them get it right then? Why no delay in others but apple? Ur argument is trash tbh.

[@colinfacemyer1356]

using rotations the watchs further in are going to count less if they are all the same accuracy and that is because they would have traveled a shorter distance by like a inch per a swing cuz it would be closer and the one further could track more per swing

[@Ivan-nq1hm]

Please make a full review! I’ve seen other videos and it shows different results. So would prefer seeing you as an actual athlete really put this to the test ! Keep up the great content as well!

[@SofiaC.Morales]

I find very interesting the position of the watches on the arms because the pixel and the samsung were more accurate and made similar measurements but also were more close to the wrist while the apple and the other one were far from the wrist but still made similar results between them 🤔

[@adr23]

Step count no problem...

[@sebastian-ny1sp]

I remember maybe 10 years ago people were saying the old step counter you got in happy meals from mc donalds was among the most accurate at the time. Happy meal toys were so OP back in the day

[@Kipro007-j5m]

Marcus flexing on his office lol

[@twilight0057]

Galaxy also accurate 🙌🏻 2nd most!

[@mikehurt3290]

Also he used an old one he said he used a watch 3 and they're up to 6 now

[@JuaniPodrido]

I have a Samsung watch, they owe me a bunch of steps I've taken that was never recorded

[@KMCA779]

@@JuaniPodridoWhen you first start walking? I've noticed that with mine too... I've just assumed that it either adds them later or just forgets about them... But I walk for most of my 12 hour shift, I'm fine with it being a bit off, I'm doing up to 30k steps a day. (usually more like 16k)

[@philvillafana2584]

of course the Apple watch is the worst one 😂LOLL but people still say it's the best in 2024!😭

[@PhieFty]

"On your way up the 1,000 Steps again, Marques?"

[@laParka777]

fug, right in the nostalgia

[@EmunBanda]

Yo! Where’d the Apple watch take all those 45 whole footsteps??🤣🤣🤣

[@igorrocha1845]

Marked Brownlee: the greatest, most dedicated tech communicator of our time

[@karimcalled]

Why would you ever spell his name like that 💀💀💀

[@igorrocha1845]

@@karimcalled Marked? Because he marked my mom 💀☠️

[@0311nate]

Now you can finally rest, and watch the sun rise on a grateful universe.

[@sb3791]

My guy is building the infinity gauntlet of smartwatches

[@nvmeditzz]

"Sorry pal,forgot to record" -Famous last words

[@travelblazer07]

Bro called us poor in 5 languages 💀

[@PanzerGuy]

The Smartwatches: "Yo bro how many steps did you get?" *"Abraham Lincoln?"*

[@noobsthename]

Thanks for answering those questions we're too afraid to ask.

[@MD-wz8uz]

Hands down the coolest tech guy to ever live. This dude is truly blessed at his craft, it’s like he can’t get it wrong.

[@manuel0578]

Did you do the calibration on each of those watches beforehand? They need a while to adjust to your stride etc.

[@EcoThink2024]

Cool. They are pretty close. Wearables have advanced so much, and we will get the Galaxy Ring soon! 😊😊

[@zook_291]

Fun fact: the 3DS was one of the most accurate pedometers available.

[@fondbeebboop9705]

Straight up stole the top comment

[@keeshonturner9816]

"I feel like Mr beast now" yeahhh about that💀

[@eingoluq]

You need to do this test multiple times. Possibly 10-20 times with various people to get a good reading. Can be a good long form video tbh.

[@AristidesViolaris]

You used all new watches, but you chose 3 years old samsung watch 😂

[@lmmmlful]

And still it was better than the apple watch 😂

[@bakapatato272]

@@lmmmlful it's not better, he hasn't taken in account about switching positions of his watches. Apple's tracking system is way better than samsung's

[@400millionbymonday6]

Also the placement of where the watch is on your arm/wrist can affect the results. The pixel with the most accurate counting was also the most correctly placed on your wrist. A real test would be 4,000 steps. Wearing each one correctly positioned on your wrist. But that wouldn't fit in a short.

[@goodkittie2]

the issue with these counters is they also count when you move your arms or clap your hands. I discovered my fitbit over counted so I did buy the oldschool pedomoeter and i bought a withngs watch (i wanted a hybrid watch). Withings sometimes counted less than my iphone but the pedometer seemed more accurate.

[@Robert-5455]

The only issue is that you weren’t wearing them in the positions that the company tells you to put them. For example the Fitbit and Apple Watch are supposed to be two fingers from where your wrist bends, but if you were looking for a general example then it is probably fine. And yes you do look like MrBeast doing that.

[@i_forgot_my_username240]

Me just wishing I had enough money to afford any of them 😂

[@rushabhshah.2768]

Bro Don't care about buying the 800$ apple watch ultra we just saw here 250$ watch performs the best😅

[@prathmeshpatil6425]

Bro casually ignored Apple.

[@TropicalVibesHD]

Good video. Though, the idea in step counting is to make an estimate to the nearest hundred (or even nearest thousand) "steps" per day as a measure of activity and not the exact number of steps

[@Alphoric]

I feel like the placement is what caused the garmin and Apple to be off as they were around the same as each other and both higher up on the wrist

[@enterthevoidIi]

Nonsense

[@samaraisnt]

dumb cope.

[@samaraisnt]

People will naturally wear them lower/higher and by your ahh logic an NBA player and a short person couldn’t have their steps counted equally…it’s a simple pedometer. Technology old af

[@squidscrew1339]

Avoid expensive apple watch and get Galaxy watch . Poor apple users .😂😂😂

[@Dreadpirateflappy]

I like a watch that actually stays connected to my phone, my galaxy watch never did...

[@EcoThink2024]

Why a Galaxy Watch 3? Use the Galaxy Watch 5 or Galaxy watch 6!

[@theboxofdemons]

It's probably a 5 or a 6. He said 3, but by going off the bezel, that's not a 3. It could be a 5 or 6 however.

[@gusortiz81]

Does the placement of where you had to watch affect the performance of the watch? I believe you should do an individual test on each watch worn correctly

[@mr99official28]

You look like a soldier from the world wars with all those watches 😅

[@holidayarmadillo251]

lol always wondered this

[@emossard]

the ones closest to your wrist were more accurate do it all individually multiple times and track the average

[@realdenzity2144]

Man has so many watches he became “The timekeeper” 😂 from Spy Kids

[@m3hr]

a thousands wow, and pixel again nice

[@AlexStoutdev]

I predicted before seeing the numbers at the end that the Apple and the Garmin would be less accurate. This is because they’re not being worn in the position they’re supposed to be. The user guides for smart watches typically say that it should be warn about 2 finger widths from the wrist bones.

[@AlonGil]

Smart

[@brian-doesnt-know]

Mr beast would have walked 1,000,000 steps and counted every step out loud

[@6780liao]

The perfect combination of technology and aesthetics, this watch not only tells you the time, but also lets you feel the touch of the future. Now, make it a part of you

[@upvoter8163]

Apple once again the most expensive piece of trash on the market💀💀🤣🤣🤣

[@tayye00]

We just going to ignore that apple sucked the most?

[@upvoter8163]

Yes he is, Marques has always be in Apple's pocket. He criticizes other brands for things that he won't even mention when it comes to Apple.

[@Dreadpirateflappy]

Just like the Garmin it was further up his wrist, hence why they were off by around the same amount.

[@tawsiaislam2855]

Dude the Garmin also had lest accuracy cuz they both weren't placed at the end if wrist. This test should be retested again

[@Givemeacookie13]

I wonder if wearing those 2 watches that far past the wrist would account for some of that inaccuracy

[@reenokop]

6:15 Sprint attacks are weak and often bounce off. Use normal attacks and parry. Dodge with defensive offensive when they glow yellow.

[@bonganimavuso9697]

But remember that accuracy depends on your data added into the smart gadget. Your height will enable it to calculate strides per distance

[@izi941]

With garmin you could set custom stride length for walking and running. Then it would be 999 or even 1000

[@willcasto6928]

The watches lower on your wrist preformed better and they also experienced greater arm travel. Gotta swap positions and roll it again

[@The_Asteroid_]

Galaxy: Ohh ... so you had started walking before I started counting. You had already stepped 6 steps when I counted 1.# That's not my fault. Ped: I thought you had already stepped 168 steps before taking me out, so I added it. It's the fault of my AI. I can think a LOT

[@dr.adeagbojesutomi]

I'm curious if those depends on your arm swing to be accurate. If yes, the watches worn a bit away from the wrist are disadvantaged.

[@shiba18inu]

Them cheering you for taking 1k steps is like me cheering my boss for opening a pdf file (to get my promotion) 😂