Modern Nuclear Weapons are TERRIFYING

[@azpont7275]

As an Alien, especially if not oxygen based, Earth is literally Hell itself where everything is constantly burning due to the oxygen and it also have fecking apes throwing nukes around. Our whole sector would be a dedicated no-go zone right away.

[@lamardavisakald4438]

too bad aliens are probably also busy fighting their own wars since they haven't visited earth yet

[@hazarush]

Another fellow omega lynx inhabit

[@wotbmemeplatooning]

And about that Tsar Bomba crater. it may not seem that impressive at first, but you gotta remember that it was detonated 4 km above ground.

[@SimCityEA1989]

Any Civ game (or a game that takes place in modern day) using Nukes is a death sentence. However, in Stellaris, its a default weapon you use for default bombardment. Let that sink in-

[@saywhat1844]

they have other planets to fall back on, we only got one. and only xenophobes or very aggressive species get total bombardment. let that sink in-

[@ryrkra8096]

Also that's only Tier 1 Missiles, When you get to Tier 5 the devastation is even more

[@femboyshitposter676]

​@@saywhat1844 Only Xeno scum restricts itself to their weakest weapons.

[@Elyseon]

And in some Civ games, using nukes makes the whole world declare war on you.

[@tylerredforge5563]

tommy trying not to be a technocrat 10 seconds challenge

[@zondor8123]

Stellaris early game bombs and rockets are nuclear level destruction, it is truly a genocidal simulator game 😂

[@MetalCharlo]

Imagine having no nukes? WW3 starts literally the second it happens lmfao.

[@alexeyamosov664]

Honestly, kinda worth not having those

[@nubnubdubdeh]

yeah greece vs turkey the balkans half of europe the middle east wars would immediately be constant lol

[@iplaygames8090]

in regard to tommy saying he wouldnt want to live in a big city. Heres a quote from the general secretary of the USSR Nikita Kruschev: "The living will envy the dead"

[@DouglasAlmeida-s7h]

11:42 That's impossible, they would have to have supplies for over 30,000 years. Radiation remains for thousands of years, nuclear fallout would ruin the harvest of many countries that were not even bombed.

[@sebastianprimomija8375]

1:52 perfect yet unfortunate dono

[@UngeTaaSleiker]

3:30 technocracy is not reason and logic

[@ghfgxijaorgf5393]

it is exclusively that, you might think that reasoning only with science and not at all with emotions might be illogical and unreasonable but thats how it is, technocracy might not be moral but it is definitely logical and reasonable,

[@UngeTaaSleiker]

@@ghfgxijaorgf5393 But science is ever changing and not meant to be trusted. People are constantly trying to disprove scientific theories which is the point of them. So a society based on science is not logical nor reasonable.

[@technobloode9709]

​​@@ghfgxijaorgf5393 wierd how communism the ideology that advocates for the end of class conflict and freedom for all is viewed as a dystopia with everyone within it uniform and devoid of emotions while technocracy the ideology that advocates for supremacy of logic and discards emotions is viewed as a paradise where everyone can be free and yet it is the ideology most prone with uniformity and what humans are inherently not born to be - perfect in a twisted narrow mined way

[@unknownentity8256]

9:15 Brotha I'm from Northern Scandinavia and I can tell u nobody ain't winning here 4 sure St. Petersburg is right next to us. Yes there are enough nuclear bunkers for 3mil in Finland but there is a quote that has never left my mind by Nikita Khruschev during the height of the Cold War: "The living will envy the dead." As to imply even those that survive will lose. If you ask me I'll rather be evaporated then suffer through living underground my whole life without internet, fuuuuuuuuuck dat´bro.

[@ZuNk]

Also the surface will be so contaminated, the sky will be completely black blocking all sunlight from the ashes of all the cities burning, also called a nuclear winter, it will be freezing cold, surface water will be completely undrinkable, it would just suck

[@nikolaypetrov9789]

you will have to spend couple hundred years in bunker, meaning your kids still will not see sun and maybe their kids too

[@ImperativeGames]

Look at the bright side: it won't be a long life. Food will run out in months if not weeks.

[@spacecowboy1929]

LMAO that rs-28 was the one that blew up in its silo on september 21st when they tried to test it lmaooo, technology my ass

[@duccao539]

Tommyk the reviewer is back

[@pktrainerpk5supersus459]

bro u forgot the 100 megatons torpedos called poseidon torpedo look it up on wikipedia imagine 100 feet tall 30 meter tsunamis ruining coastal areas ruining shipyards infrastrucure

[@potatowifu9124]

12:39 that what the starwars project was for . But unfortunately I don’t believe it was fully developed

[@UngeTaaSleiker]

sadly not

[@everynamewastakenomg]

I live in bumfuck nowhere so I'd end up dying of starvation in a nuclear winter 💀

[@Ratimir101]

So you still love “green” party?

[@marcellotrull1092]

I live in Columbia SC and seeing anything that is happening in NY is crazy

[@cyberneticbutterfly8506]

Meaningless to run away to Greenland, the nuclear winter would kill all plant life on earth, maybe if you have a prepper bunker there to last you a lifetime.

[@Asbjorn268]

Hey tommy, since we're on the topic of nuclear weapons, a good video I would suggest would be a video called "The Ant Walkers of Hiroshima" by Shrouded Hands, he reads the first hand accounts of the victims of the bomb on Hiroshima, and really puts it into a lot of perspective

[@Laharlo]

Check out Twilight Zone "A little Peace and quiet" from the 80's I think. It's about a timestop power during war

[@Thirdeye_Shaman]

Bro I watched this nuke video about a week ago. It blew my mind absolutely

[@bman3475]

If nobody had nukes we’d experience a lot more wars

[@Infergal]

7:19 The craziest part about this, is that my commute to work is about 22 miles. So every town I drive through would be destroyed in an instant 😅 Oh and I live close to a nuclear plant, so that’s cool too 😂

[@tylerredforge5563]

wow they made hoi4 goterdemurng in real life

[@eclipse3037]

"it's nice and black, i like it" from tommy himself

[@gottogo3326]

"its nice and black i like it" 15:50

[@Benepene]

Imagine; 1x 20 Megaton R 36 having more explosive power than a world war. I mean literally a world war. Every bullet Grenade Bomb dropped.

[@djolemihojlic8946]

Jusr to say at the peak of the cold war and the arms race in the 80s the Us and Soviet union had more than 50 000 warheads of nukes and hydrogen bombs today all arsenals combined have less than 8 000 so it is a bit beter than before 😂

[@darthvader3840]

Imagine being the pilot that gets the order to drop one of these.

[@lazmanyacanavar5888]

İ don't wanna man.

[@varshavianka848]

Hell fucking no

[@samuelspiel8855]

Just following orders

[@MetalCharlo]

Nothing personnal, kids.

[@x3xd869]

Bro has not heard about Project SunDial😶😶😶

[@Ghost_6012]

Now I truly believe, ignorance is bliss

[@unknownentity8256]

4:23 Tommy there are many forms of alternative vehicles to combustion engines? Electric, Hydro ??? Even coal powered cars exist but they're novelty. Problem is creating cars that are easily manufactured in a mass scale is the issue, not renewable energy implementation into said vehicles. Also I understand the desired utopia but unfortunately that isn't possible with the human race it seems, I wouldn't doubt for a second there would be immediate WW3 if nuclear weapons were all neutralized and everyone decided to never build them again which already would not happen. It is unfortunate that we need to wield world ending power in order to avoid global conflict but that is the way it is and it's honestly pure luck of unquantifiable magnitudes that we have not already been through a near extinction event in the form of M.A.D.

[@zhabruh4682]

coal powered cars a novelty? what are you smoking dude

[@unknownentity8256]

@@zhabruh4682 Novelty meaning they are rare and not feasible for mass production, it's just an example of alternate energy to fossil fuels.

[@zhabruh4682]

@@unknownentity8256 you know that coal is a fossil fuel right

[@kaifariz]

what do you mean no one would want this? truman literally did this and killed thousand of innocent lives.

[@WillisMillis]

And these are just the ones we know about.

[@JayDoeHOI4]

13:14 😂😂😂

[@Glazay-5603]

As a citizen of Mars, watching you people use those to threaten one another scares me, and is absolutely so unnecessary and such a set back.

[@Summon333]

It's funny what you said near the end because my mom said the same thing. Huh I wonder why no one visits us haha. 🤣

[@epicgamerman1015]

Have you heard of project sundial?

[@nubnubdubdeh]

The stars are ours!

[@nucleardawn]

Bruh, not as formidable - but you can try

[@sirkana]

How about project Sun Dial?

[@user-jt3bf8ws5q]

Not made

[@a_person_of_all_time]

12:36 Thats a stupid idea. There are things that can shoot down the nukes, they can be devolped and made better and at a larger scale, however that would intern start a escolation from another side, trying to develop something bigger and more efficent... this process would never end and so the countries have unspoken rule, to both not to devolop better ICBMs and better interdiction rockets

[@azpont7275]

Some ICBMs can travel on the very edge of our lower orbit, where most signals go out, making it almost impossible to shoot down before properly reentering.

[@mucurovic4665]

@@azpont7275 I am pretty sure the orbital stations above earth have an answer against that. No superpower would sit on their asses knowing their opponent can launch ISBMs against them, but they have no way of shooting them down.

[@azpont7275]

@@mucurovic4665 "very edge of our lower orbit" means it's zipping back and forth the edge, orbital stations can't really answer that. Also it's not common to put anti-missile system to orbit...

[@svenrio8521]

Why did he start watching this anyways?

[@Mina4t20]

U like watching informative videos, I would have assumed u would know Trump is one of the few people that can actually prevent ww3

[@ser43_OLDC]

You dont know what is Nuclear Pax isn't it?

[@Yomest-ip3tq]

Tommy should check out project sundial. Kurzgesaught made a video on it

[@Summon333]

I think it's called left for dead.

[@owennoad-watson2820]

Hoi4 with mirvs… hoi4 is already toxic enough

[@SauceBrazil]

The fact that you think that Trump ain't adult enough compare to democrat US (who has legit the most killing politics in recent era) is kinda funny.

[@ineedcaffeine1310]

lol

[@Thor12233]

Hes a manchild with no plan. Hes been running on hopes and dreams and regarded americans elected him.(not to mention his a felon and a traitor who tried to steal an election and suspend the constitution)

[@MetalCharlo]

ESPECIALLY since Biden allowed atacms

[@lawden210]

Dig this reaction!

[@nav_101]

Deterence provided by nuclear weapons is the reason why major conflicts have been avoided. If we had no nukes we’d have ww5 on the horizon 😂😂😂

[@treybone3263]

I don’t like this video…

[@grandaddy9988]

heyyy

[@retkuperkele]

So the conclusion is that the America needs bigger bombs

[@KolyaUrtz]

Not really. Target of America is pretty much only Russia. In such a scenario goal of America would be destruction of Russia. In such a scenario, goal of Russia would be destruction of the world. Russians are aiming at bigger things. This is because such a scenario would be caused by western attempt at subjugation of russians and destruction of Russia.

[@Jakesnyder77]

287 views in ten minutes smh bro fell of

[@Seppe_Van_Dam]

Brother why are you hating he is doing the things he loves i am jealous of him

[@Damage_Brazil]

Hes joking, its a running joke on youtube comments​@@Seppe_Van_Dam

[@Aaron_Guest]

​@Seppe_Van_Dam Bro it's a meme.

[@marcellusdererste4413]

21.000 10h later xdd

[@Jakesnyder77]

@@Seppe_Van_Dam its a joke brother

[@admbeck]

Didn't Russian missile test fail recently?

[@Dynioglowy1986]

you talking about satan 2 test ? Yeah did fail ! But thats what tests are for . This missle been tested to repleace existing missiles in future . dont trust media about everything ......

[@shnzyy]

tests are made for that

[@thehaldirgames1599]

@@shnzyy it didnt just fail it blow up in their own silo the satan 2

[@KolyaUrtz]

​@@thehaldirgames1599yet tests of satan 1 didn't fail once...or any other delivery system. Did your see the new hazelnut weapon? Spectacular isn't it...

[@aotmoments7410]

America wins even if the nation is destroyed they got 12 carriers Always in the ocean lol

[@calion7643]

how is that a win? Nobodey wins

[@AadityaDahiya84769]

All aircraft carriers are not deployed at all times.Aircraft carriers require extensive maintenance.

[@aotmoments7410]

@@calion7643 1 aircraft carrier has enough firepower to rival entire nations …

[@calion7643]

@@aotmoments7410 what is a purpose of military hardware-to protect its people/nation and if there is no nation to protect anymore. Its a loss. Hence why in nuclear war everyone losses

[@samuelspiel8855]

Wouldn't call that "winning"

[@maxtex60n40]

This is just the new fallout game coming soon.