Have Democrats Forgotten About Men? - Richard Reeves

[@ChrisWillx]

Hello you savages. Watch the full episode with Richard here - kzbin.info/www/bejne/imfZiIt5iNygjKM Get expert bloodwork analysis and bypass Function’s 300,000-person waitlist at functionhealth.com/modernwisdom

[@phant0m92]

yeah if only I lived in the USA. useless advert 🙄.

[@dadsergeantandgardener5319]

Savages…savages usually don’t set to crying about “oh have the Dems forgotten about us…lmao)!

[@GargantuanGouda]

Would be interested in getting your take on the "APA Guidelines for the Psychological Practice with Boys and Men." Came out in August 2018.

[@wyredmusic]

Getting lectured about the patriarchy by women who make 8x my yearly salary is getting tiring for the last 8 years

[@djdairyqueen4095]

This

[@horgecondaliza6644]

The left need to finally understand that, when they think they are punching up, they are really punching down. The left is the establishment now, and has been for more than a decade.

[@chamboyette853]

A salary they get BECAUSE they did dodgy things on top of that.

[@ThatsMrPencilneck2U]

Amen, brother!

[@Dan_dan281]

No, they didn’t forget about men. They have deliberately thrown them overboard.

[@kristianlavigne8270]

Under the bus 🚌 or out with the garbage more likely 😅

[@fallenangels8079]

That's why we need to be strong, physically and mentally, more so than ever before 💪

[@DM_Curtis]

No, they let us know that they still hate us every chance they get.

[@CharlieBaker-c4u]

Lolol. Ok communist troll blaming others for guys and their own individual decisions.

[@007bbox]

Articulate how a political party of half men hate you and other men that are their sons, fathers, partners, teachers, coworkers, friends, etc. Try and explain how you’re hated

[@Tons-z2r]

@@DM_Curtis hate is a four letter word. Peace within is more productive.

[@Wayward9]

In what way? Please explain

[@CharlieBaker-c4u]

@ it’s a communist paid troll posting bullshit for trump. Ignore it unless you are here to have fun.

[@mar0364]

Stop blaming the male patriarchy for everything. There’s a start.

[@007bbox]

They’re not blamed for everything.

[@michaeldodd3563]

@@007bboxeverything? No, not everything, however, any instance of disparity is automatically distilled down to the gender as the univariate dimension of analysis, rather than accounting for other reason why, for instance, women pick certain jobs and not others.

[@007bbox]

@@michaeldodd3563 Distilled down to gender by who? The % of the population that engages in a practice of admonishing and denigrating men in real life is insignificant and is felt by an even smaller number of men in real life. I suspect the number of men that actually engage in perpetuating real disparities in our society outnumber the people that accuse men of the disparity.

[@michaeldodd3563]

@@007bbox by who? You have to be joking!? Anyone who supports DEI, BLM, DNC, and LGBTQAI+ does the same bad math. They’ll add up all the income that men make and then all the income that women make, and if it happens that men make more, they conclude that there exists a wage gap, and that men make more than women. They conclude that (as the OP eluded) the problem is patriarchal. The problem with this kind of logic is that it fails to consider “why” men make more than women. They only consider gender as a factor, and fail to consider temperament, job selection, or the fact that men on average are more interested in things, which lends itself to jobs that scale, whereas women, on average are more interested in people, and choose jobs that don’t scale, like nursing. A nurse can only take care of so many patients.

[@exzisd]

I never looked at men as superior to women or women as superior to men - I've seen that certain people are gifted with a set of skills and typically men and women have unique interests and skills. The feminism of today has people ascribe to their beliefs that men should be lesser than because they lead in many places women traditionally and naturally don't tend to gravitate towards from STEM fields and beyond. I would love to go back to an economy where it's possible to have men and women live in harmony with one working and one being the homemaker. I can understand some women want to work but if I was a woman I'd way rather an economy where it's possible to stay at home and take care of the family rather than many relationships where both work to provide for less people and many don't have children.

[@bobcharles7933]

We wish they had forgotten us. Instead they just hate us.

[@Cool2023FtwNoice]

AGREE 😓😓😅

[@RightTailAngst]

⁠@nicolasgirard2808no kidding

[@andreisopon4615]

Jesus Christ, I'm a dude, what's with this endless crying?

[@andrewrai5752]

@nicolasgirard2808 He's expressing his feelings, stop telling people what they can and can't say! stop with being dictatorial!

[@vavictus]

They only Hate men without college degrees, men who aren’t voting for Harris, and men with their balls still attached.

[@JezaLoki]

I’m fine with being ignored. I just wish I was ignored when they’re looking for a dangerous job to be done or looking for someone to blame.

[@plantbased9502]

What dangerous job are YOU specifically being forced to do? And what are YOU specifically being blamed for?

[@autisticspaceman9397]

@@plantbased9502 "bUt HoW dOeS tHiS aFfEcT yOu PeRsOnAlLy?!"

[@MrBarrystuart]

At timeline 5:15 - How does your guest not think it was intentional to completely omit men. Democrats haven't forgotten about men - that's the primary group they have chosen to wage war against.

[@Namelbmert]

Well-said.

[@themore-you-know]

That guy is a hypocrite. He plays lip service to the Democrats and the Left. He constantly spews the lie that "oh, the Left just have a blind spot... it's not an open hatred for (Whte) men".

[@HHaydenH]

But it's backfired on them wholeheartedly. Democrats thought that men with wives, mothers, sisters, girlfriends who were going to vote Democrat would just automatically join them and do the same. So they intentially focused on women and acted like they'd be the "voices of reason". They were wrong.

[@scottl9660]

Democrats care about everyone…everyone but a dude. This guy isn’t talking about the “Who We Serve” for on the democratic website, he’s talking about the Harris campaign so now two democratic platforms are deliberately discriminating against men. It’s not random, it’s anyone BUT you.

[@Leonhart_93]

Because his bias is very thick. Just like when he couldn't figure out why that infrastructure bill was rejected.

[@Scar-jg4bn]

They didn't forget about us, they hate us.

[@asterik917]

Getting patronized every single day about how men are the problem with everything going wrong in the world then turning around and asking for them to vote for you is the pinnacle of insanity.

[@Levelity]

Infrastructure bill was supposed to expand broadband service and it's cost billions and has not created service for one single individual. The problem with the bill is that it was a $2.7 trillion tax on businesses that gave more money to a government who clearly can't spend money wisely. $36 trillion in debt. They don't deserve another cent from the public.

[@mindyourbusiness6293]

he doesn't understand US legislation. Every bill is about 30% what it pretends to be and 70% unrelated law, funding, or regulation. Pork, edits, lobbyist agenda, literally trojan horses. I wish congress passed many, succinct, direct bills to make laws to deal with the specific issues they pretend to address.

[@TheJeremyKentBGross]

Infrastructure bill isn't helpful to young dudes even if they get the jobs ultimately because if government is paying for it then really it means even more inflation, and thus their wages are worth increasingly less as fast as they can collect them. Government gimmes isn't a solution, it's already one of the main problems with the economy, and that's before we even get to your very valid point about it also just being wasted resources.

[@sinesaii]

Oh, Intel, TSMC, Samsung and Texas Instruments are each getting billions. At these we’re not funded. The tax will be on individuals for many years to come. Read the evil Telecom Actbof 1994 to see what this corruption looks like long-term

[@nickd2296]

They hate Elon Musk so they refused to use his Starlink technology that works way better for rural communities.

[@BlueBeamProjectionist]

​@@TheJeremyKentBGross it definitely did help young guys. Myself and several of my younger coworkers were able to get out of debt and make major steps in life like buying a home because of the scale pay from working on a federally funded project.

[@TheStoneyJackson]

How the fuck is being the first public school teacher to get the job helpful in anyway. Most of us went to public school, we all know exactly how it works. Not exactly unique perspective.

[@15walkingaway]

You're right. We should only elect lawyers. What do the rest of us peasants know. We don't deserve representation.

[@liamthomas2014]

How the fuck is being the first rich business man to get the job helpful in anyway. Most of us have used businesses and corporations and we all know exactly how it works. Not exactly a unique perspective

[@lukeschilperoort9934]

Being a public school teacher would disqualify you from becoming a president in my book. Essentially just means you’ve lived and survived completely within the bureaucratic system.

[@15walkingaway]

@@lukeschilperoort9934 then we should also disqualify anyone with previous government (even those elected from local to national office) and military experience?

[@somerealnews6312]

@@lukeschilperoort9934lol whatttt?!

[@cromemako83]

Divide and conquer - the ruling class has loved this trick for quite some time - who is advantaged by races, families, young and old, men and women being divided? The state, they will come in and "take care" of everything; you can trust them. :)

[@RogerS1978]

You need them to protect you from the 'evil' enemies...while we're at it look at how little you have...wouldn't communism/islam etc. be a lot better off, we'd give you so much as long as you sell your soul.

[@chlorophyllmorelikeboraphy6874]

💯 it doesn’t matter what party. No party has done anything for men from a policy perspective. Only differences that Republicans dominate the Manosphere, which does nothing of substance for men. This is a shallow argument.

[@vavictus]

It worked until it didn’t. Now they’ll get Trump. And if that doesn’t help them wake up, something even more disruptive will come later.

[@sad_wrangler8515]

@@RogerS1978 The funny thing is that the communists said that segregating the entire society into small groups is a form of asymmetric warfare to destroy a state from within. Yuri Bezmenov even made videos about this, which are digitized and available on KZbin. He spoke in the 70s and 80s in great depth about how to destroy a nation.

[@RogerS1978]

@@sad_wrangler8515 I've seen it, also look at what happened to Iran. The liberal loonies, commies and Islamists took over the country, then the Islamists killed off the other groups and took sole control.

[@wrestlingfanman22]

All I wanna say is that they don't really care about us

[@007bbox]

How manly of you.

[@JS-vl5gd]

Michael, have you reincarnated? So good to have you back! Are you living in a favela in Rio de Janeiro now?

[@mickj9203]

@@007bbox How dismissive of you

[@SovereignHyena]

@@007bbox Wow worst commentator.

[@007bbox]

@@SovereignHyena We can see your comment history. You’re no angel

[@Stranger_In_The_Alps]

No reason to work for a society that sees you as disposable.

[@user-yv4mm6bx3c]

They never cared about us to begin with.

[@robscragga]

Who’d of thought that demonising men, calling them toxic and to STFU. Blaming them for everything wrong in the world who turn them away from the Democratic Party.

[@papercityvlogs4325]

I work with liberal women. Even when a male colleague is nice respectful and takes time to explain something they roll their eyes and call it "mansplaining". It is always woe is me patriarchy and mansplaining.

[@Mew2Win]

And only young men are waking up. Millennials & up are so far up their--- BUBBLE

[@rcbryant10]

They didn't just "forget men". They actively villainized them and did their level best to drive them from the party.

[@souleymaneben]

Answer to title: Yes, About 20 years ago

[@angelhunterwolf3384]

🤣🎯💯🔥

[@sirdiealot53]

When republicans stole the presidency in 2000

[@chlorophyllmorelikeboraphy6874]

How so? What have republicans done for men policy wise?

[@AndyStitzer]

And we all know which administration it was when it all started...

[@niallfitzpatrick6568]

Yup

[@gwynjames2077]

Democrats and Gillette are in the same camp.

[@fluffyy-8341]

maybe i havent been in the loop but i still find their aloe shave gel pretty nice, lol

[@jeffvillapiano541]

Robert Kraft's football team plays at Gillette Stadium so that tracks lol

[@brettbarton2370]

Instead of showing men that they can do things better. . . they simply treat men the same way they hate to be treated. They are speaking against something that they are doing even better. The pendulum effect. . .

[@ranadheera5770]

The infrastructure bill is pro infrastructure, not pro men, working class men will benifit from it as a result but that dosent make it a pro men bill And even then, men's problems are not that they don't have enough low status construction jobs, buts it's that they don't have enough degrees to get high status jobs Anything that benifts working class men is welcomed, but the core issues is of primary concern

[@jonathancummings3807]

No. College Degrees is a debt trap. The society abandoning manufacturing capability for finance and other "White Collar" sectors is the problem. It creates a weak realm that couldn't actually win a war the way the Union wasn't the Civil War, nor how the USSR abd USA manufacturing capabilities enabled literally 50 million strong forces to storm under and destroy the Axis in WW2. Now the USA and Russia cannot win wars against 3rd rate enemies willing to fight guerilla warfare for years and willing to take huge casualties while fighting, much less the 3rd Reich.

[@Patson20]

Construction workers get paid more than teachers my dude

[@gordongekko2781]

Upward mobility will always be very limited in a mature economy (like the US), because far more people are needed in the trenches than are needed in the C-Suite. So to use your example, even if every man in America were given a college degree, that would just result in a lot of over-educated construction workers with student loan debt. There's a reason why an insect colony will have 10,000 worker drones, but only ONE queen.

[@mattwoods478]

​@gordongekko2781 as is already the case.

[@haventjotaclue]

More infrastructure = more building more building = more work more work for same amount of people = more demand more demand = more money

[@richardspillers6282]

Those 18-25 yo guys they want to punish weren't even around when all the perceived oppression kicked off and neither were the cat karens.

[@bamboosho0t]

Yes, (D) did. Men, in these circumstances, walk softly and carry a massive stick. That cudgel was their vote 🗳. And (D) felt it.

[@budoyong1]

So here is the result

[@Krabbykrabbkrabb]

This hits so much harder now

[@lukeschilperoort9934]

Tuned out right around the time he said Democrats have some good policies for men.

[@PassifloraCerulea]

I stuck around long enough to find out what that was: infrastructure bill. Supposedly to give jobs to working class men. Maybe true, probably a lot of non-citizens getting those jobs, if you know what I mean.

[@lukeschilperoort9934]

@@PassifloraCerulea Yeah he’s either an idiot or hopes that we are. Infrastructure bill is a rebranded way of saying more wasteful government spending that will be mostly laundered and pocketed by the same corrupt government that’s already been doing that the last 4 years.

[@sinesaii]

We do not need any more policies. We need to roll back policies. What boys and men need is to be left alone. Government got us into this mess. The last thing we need are more evil government program. Government programs are corruption pure and simple. FYI, I administer and fund this sh^t, and we are all better off if we shut it down.

[@richardlefaive1944]

@@PassifloraCeruleaIt was total crap

[@andrewbiddle2487]

We haven’t forgotten the Gillette commercial.

[@BitterPhil]

Hypergamy and patriarchy are two sides of the same coin. This means that women's behaviour often reinforces and perpetuates the "patriarchy" they claim is so oppressive.

[@rollyknevels3570]

Since 1972. Cancelled.

[@yaboyjosh3023]

Maybe we moved to the right because the conservatives don't treat us like garbage.

[@christianmadore7574]

I appreciate the topic. But I'm sick of hearing men speak about men's issues from a place of apology toward the left.

[@Auticusx]

Because diversity was never about diversity it was about a power grab.

[@ljthirtyfiver]

I don’t care For rhe democrat party or women’s rights . Idk how they expect a man to invest in something they have no benefit from and don’t get returns on . In the contrary you invest in men the women and children literally get the returns of that investment. Good luck to women but I’m not voting for a party that doesn’t see this .

[@lmcov4]

They not only forgot about men. They forgot about common sense.

[@joannbaumann4028]

so true

[@fluffyy-8341]

the problem when ideologues are in power and they want everyone else to just be an obedient ideologue like everyone else in office, the difference is most of us havent literally sold our moral principles and integrity

[@Wayward9]

Preaching common sense when you claim men are under attack is hilarious

[@mickj9203]

​@@Wayward9Not an argument

[@cathylong4031]

Yes

[@MamaLee5]

What else was in that infrastructure bill? They always disguise the bad stuff in beautiful named bills. Like our Border bill gave billions to Ukraine for their border and a pittance to the US southern border.

[@LegatusGaius]

There wasn’t a border bill because after we bargained for an Ukraine-aid-for-border-funding bill, Republicans killed the very deal they asked for. Then they drug their feet on funding Ukraine/Israel/Taiwan aid, finally did it after 5-6 months of dithering, and then never got around to actually fixing border. Hint: they never wanted to fix it because it’s a much better for them to keep the issue to clobber Democrats over the head with.

[@CharlieRogers50]

They can't forget us because then who would they have to blame?

[@MICHAELinNCusa]

The Democrats have forgotten about everybody but themselves. That's your answer.

[@RCCarDude]

There legit needs to be a Men's League of Voters.

[@dameander]

No, just the American men.

[@NebulaSon]

No! Every man. And they haven't forgotten, they just don't care about men

[@sporttiger1766]

Regarding infrastructure bill....WE HAVE NO MONEY $35T in debt. Its an inflation creator. Feel lile this completely ignores that fact

[@SueBeth834]

I believe they have. But having two sons, a husband, a father and a brother, etc., etc., I haven’t.

[@jaimegutierrez5520]

They not only forget about men, they forget about all Americans.

[@Namelbmert]

They didn't forget. Leftist hate America.

[@dilipkenwat-xd3md]

this video literally came in the perfect moment in my life, love you

[@profwilliams2772]

Walz' crying kid was "special." There have been MANY proud sons of their dads who didn't cry. I cannot imagine my son crying like that for me doing anything. My first thought when I saw him was, what's up with that. It's one thing to wipe away a tear, the Walz kid was BALLIN'. And when anyone questioned this, they were scolded, "He's Special!!!" Okay. But then Watz calls Musk a Dipsh*t, even though Musk has asperger syndrome and is on the autistic spectrum. Forgive me, Walz is no example of masculinity. No way. The Dems have left men behind. Or rather pushed them out!

[@c.f.okonta8815]

I agree with you

[@kyleloney4191]

The reason a lot people are skeptical is because that whole scene looks like it was the first time Walz ever told his son I love you.

[@azzc1111]

Masculinity is not judging someone else's relationship and getting on with your own life. Try it.

[@kyleloney4191]

@ you can’t define masculinity

[@Jm-Gonz]

Reproductive rights, euphemism for abortion nice term used to describe the termination of a live pregnancy, which is destroying human life before birth

[@RCCarDude]

@@Jm-Gonz Exactly. Literal human sacrifice. Demonic stuff.

[@Tons-z2r]

Let each state decide on abortion and issues. Listen! 🎉

[@nickjohnson1424]

If someone hit a baby in the womb it’s murder but if at a point a woman does it-it’s not taking a life? Protect the unborn

[@Patson20]

And that it doesn't do anything for men, no male version of abortion for men

[@fluffyy-8341]

they HAVE to constantly dress up the language because they know it is flatly egregious upon a plain and honest observation

[@rupok90]

Aged well

[@eddy274]

No taxation without representation

[@Rickywwx]

Chris would be so much better than either of the two candidates we have!

[@kinGsaL1515]

I always listen to these talks during my workout but this one with confusing for me because you both sound so alike I could never tell who was talking until I peeked at my phone 😂

[@jamesmavis577]

Infrastructure investment by the government does NOT go to the working class it goes to the bloated bureaucracy.

[@j.l.a.delagarza6994]

Gosh, it’s always refreshing to hear two Brits discussing American politics.

[@dennishansel9526]

Infrastructure investments help working class men? Not so much when cheap labor floods across the border with the government snapping up affordable housing for the migrants. Not when VA hospital expansion is done using cheap non-union labor from out of state. I hear cheap talk but see nothing for the blue-collar working man.

[@tkm238-d4r]

Good point. That is 1 reason why I think under Trump47, the RINOs will not really change anything for lower end males. The RINOs are pro-corporate globalist establishment people who use so-called conservative values as a means to an end. The so-called cultural war is just Globalist Team Blue v Globalist Team Red. Blue collar men arguing with white collar women over abortion aren't going to improve the real economic situation.

[@scurvydog20]

I want to know what he defines as turning back the clock on women

[@jutsu1]

Hopefully burkas.

[@microchrist6122]

Use your imagination

[@jonathancummings3807]

Easy. Restoration of traditional societal roles, like in the 1950's to 1970's most recently or so.

[@sebastiannita3704]

Probably abortion

[@Patson20]

We should repeal the 19th amendment.

[@carloscortes1577]

Not democrats in the comments telling us to man up 🤣

[@niallfitzpatrick6568]

What happened to the "lt's the economy, stupid". THAT was saud by Bill Clinton, a Democrat, and it's a logical statement. So why are most women caring more about abortion???

[@jonathancummings3807]

They always did. It's logical and dangerous a game the Democrats are playing with our species continued existence. The problem is Placental Mammal reproduction is.. frankly,....an AWFUL EXPERIENCE FOR THE FEMALES. It's a terrible, life endangering experience for them. So, given a real choice, as an intelligent species like Humans are now presented with, many will opt out regardless of the instinct to reproduce. To create a new human life, Women have to be trapped as a biological incubation machine for months or so. The birth process is extreme physical agony for them. So given a real choice, MANY WILL SAY NO. Currently, too many, the Fertlity Rate is extremely low, too low for long term viability. 1.7 is well below the necessary over 2.0 per woman rate. Dr. Darrell Bricker, an extremely capable Social Scientist made clear the challenges humanity now faces.

[@suzannemcvicker617]

The Democrat party is making it all about abortion. But logically, economics and abortion are intertwined for women...

[@ElectricSoul828]

Let's help men. I love them ❤ God bless men, stay strong, men.

[@lisamartinez8200]

good to hear

[@andrew6815]

Correct. It's basic but it is the truth: eventually inclusion becomes exclusion

[@pace1195]

The candidates are getting the base out by going on shows their base constituents frequent. To paraphrase a quote: "You don't win an election with the voters you want. You win with the voters you have come to the polls." When federal elections have about a 60-65% turnout rate, getting an extra percent or two, especially in a necessary state or region, may be the difference between victory and defeat. It's much easier to convince a current voter or former non-voter to get out and vote than to change the mind of an opponent voter.

[@NicholasWHaley7]

This is the problem. Both of you were too politically correct with this issue. This has been going on for a long time. They are not ignoring men. They are openly hating them.

[@stinkystu1]

Forgotten about us? That is a laugh. They have much more torture in store for us.

[@NeoRelic-o8p]

IT'S TIME FOR MEN'S RIGHTS

[@Pler1978]

Yeah men haven't done a whole lot.. Just invented everything and built just about everything. But other than that men haven't done a lot

[@dbatteries1]

​@Pler1978 it's 2024, not 1924. Cultures have changed and discussions should be made

[@mickj9203]

​@@dbatteries1It was still men who invented nearly everything. And still remain 99.99% of casualties of war 100 years don't make any difference to that fact

[@lisamartinez8200]

yes

[@kdw0381]

LBJ was a school teacher in Texas

[@davidkulmaczewski4911]

Walz was an *assistant* coach.... he couldn't be hired as a full coach because of his DUI conviction.

[@jeffersonhassan4558]

Same way Trump will never be hired as a coach

[@mickj9203]

​@@jeffersonhassan4558He'll just be president of the United States for the second time. You're welcome

[@jeffersonhassan4558]

@@mickj9203 yep and he already won, enjoy him

[@mickj9203]

@@jeffersonhassan4558 Fuck yeah

[@OMOCarlos]

Infrastructure jobs aren't skewed toward men. Infrastructure jobs are jobs like any other job. Women just don't want to do them. If a woman can do anything a man can, there is no excuse. It's a matter of choice.

[@robingow7276]

I hate that they use the abortion issue to hamstring women. And I hate how women fall for it! We are so much more than one issue, we really need to make the parties work harder for our vote!!!!

[@MiScBy]

These guys are asking, "why are men abandoning the Democratic party?" What they aren't realizing is that if it weren't for the abortion issue, a lot of women would be abandoning it to. The irony is that if it weren't for Roe vs. Wade being overturned, the Democrats would have no winning issues to campaign on.

[@backroadsofeasternwashington]

Roe being overturned doesn’t make abortion illegal. The gullibility women show on this is not surprising to me.

[@DestructoDisk]

Repealing the 19th solves more problems than just this one.

[@Wayward9]

It's a pretty important issue. To go against it literally denies women their rights as citizens

[@Wayward9]

@@backroadsofeasternwashington It removes protections that prevent it from being illegal. I think that's pretty bad that the federal government will allow states to restrict women's choices

[@Rambleon444]

Trump goes on any show, Kamala needs a favorable interviewer or her real intelligence show. Even CNN's soft Townhall made her look clueless.

[@darmy713]

Society will remember us, but usually only after everything goes sideways or the foundational systems of society start to struggle.

[@LegatusGaius]

Yeah, I agree with the people saying that having a public school teacher as VP is irrelevant and maybe not actually good. Lawyers are in government so often because they learn how the law works and that’s how you actually get anything done in government.

[@richardlefaive1944]

It’s also useful to have a law degree as a politician due to the number of laws and procedures that govern your behavior. It’s gotten so regulated and the lawfare so intense that more and more politicians are lawyers. Soon, they’ll all be as matter of self preservation

[@LegatusGaius]

@@richardlefaive1944 yeah, absolutely. I’m biased because I’m studying it right now, but if I were not, I would literally want one or more lawyers just following me around if I held government office lol. Heck, I still might want that, even as a soon-to-be lawyer.

[@jonathanf3434]

CW and Sargon are very right... anyone on the right who mocked his son... and it wasn't a tiny amount, have started to become the very think they hate in the left. don't do it... I can't stand Walz and his faux masculinity and his positions... but his son is a young man, and so happy for his dad.. that's a great thing. Kids who are 18 or under should be off limits unless they start campaigning with parent.

[@Dara-rv4pg]

In Ireland, most of our top politicians are teachers.

[@robertdargan1113]

That explains so much about the problems in Irish politics!

[@wordragon]

This notion that those adverts are ignorant of the exclusion of men is ridiculous. They know what they are doing. I love it when someone plays the “both sides do it equally…” No, one side is interested in the grand grift while the other side is interested in making things better for Americans.

[@harrywirrelson9628]

Republicans only care about very rich men who give them donations. They’ve done nothing for working-class men, only excluded them from higher wages

[@HedgeFun35]

Nothing like 2 Brits lecturing Americans about how we should be voting

[@StimParavane]

You seem clueless though.

[@E.......]

Nearly as bad as letting unvetted border migrants to vote in your election

[@young_herc]

Founding fathers rolling in their graves 😂

[@Patson20]

Atleast one of them ran from England to Texas for the freedom, which is the original American past time

[@Dee-no3sn]

The irony of your statement is that the founding fathers were British. That's like telling a Brittish person to speak American when we both speak English. One positive thing I learnt from being on social media is the rest of the world pays attention to what goes on in America.

[@johnhulet8462]

Reeves constant apologist critique of "center left" policies sounds very calculated to endorse bad legislation full of wasteful spending as something good. Not a fan of his viewpoints

[@Medennison123]

Yes unless they transition to woman

[@wolfofthewest8019]

James Garfield was the first career teacher to become president. Lyndon B. Johnson was the second.

[@lystic9392]

5:50 It does noooooot!

[@roadscholarwarrior]

Why do you feel it’s strange to talk about it, or at least the first reaction is to feel bad about it? I would say it’s very important to speak out about the what seems to be a deliberate exclusion of men in everything from politics to silly comic book stories… it’s too obvious to ignore.

[@daviddauza]

Also Walz, probably the first NCO to run for VP.. On the military side (National Guatd), Walz was a senior NCO (Sargeant Major), so used to being technically outranked by 1st Lieutenants.

[@robertdargan1113]

How do you know? He's lied about so much!

[@rrozoff1]

Couldn't Reeves vary from the feel-good Harris script even by a syllable?

[@KatallinaVT]

The 0 out of 7 thing for the image is crazy. It should have been 4, or at least three if they were including someone who was going to somehow come off as very visually non-binary.

[@MarkWSutton24]

If you care about this topic, you may be interested in my book "How Democrats Can Win Back Men" which does a deep dive into my strategies for Democrats to better appeal to male voters. Mark W. Sutton

[@e-moshe]

Much preferred the subsequent interview you had with George from the UK. He describes himself as left wing and yet was far relatable and understanding. Someone a guy could have as a really knowledgeable and balanced friend even if your politics differ. Not impressed with this Richard Reeves, on the other hand.

[@wisconsinrf9595]

I and Mine has always had Me. No need for political parties.

[@BASSFZz]

That was corny. 😂🤣

[@alienfleet3702]

The bubble Richard Reeves lives in was clearly evident in this interview

[@outlawvoodoo]

Men are Republicans or independents

[@harrywirrelson9628]

Not in the big cities

[@mickj9203]

​@@harrywirrelson9628Big cities are always blue almost no matter what. The demographic they're trying to reach are the working class men who typically live in suburbs or country settings.

[@WhizzingFish12]

Its the logical trajectory of intersectional identity politics.

[@christianmadore7574]

I wonder if Reeves knows That his position aligns with just about every other feminist apologist. It goes something like this: " Obviously, the Empowering of women at the expense and at the active denegration of men is more or less justified, let me tell you for the next hour about the problems associated with that movement."

[@oliversmith2129]

These supposed advocates for men's issues can't talk about men for 1 minute without simping for women and shaming men for not manning up or doing better.

[@Erianthor]

People of the modern era are neither victims, nor are they victimisers - per se. They are the casualties!

[@SlimJimGod]

I love Chris. I hate his fanbase. I feel like nobody in the comments even watched the full video.

[@Checklight66]

If you had a proper public health system in America a blood test would cost you nothing, but instead Americans would rather have a bunch of goons praying on the population with their masters the insurance industry deciding who lives or dies and creating more bankruptcy than almost any cause in America. With a bit of political pressure America could have a world class medical system for all it's citizens which would cost the tax payers considerably less and would be far more humane and infinitely less ghoulish than the current system.

[@PrinceBlake]

Speaking on the objects of discrimination, "They're very drawn to anyone who will (9:35) feel their pain." Chris, what a great guest and critical conversation. I don't know how successful you will be in bringing on the two VPs (separately) but allow me to make a suggestion of two guests that have never appeared together in any podcast or any legal deposition or courtroom case although it is a crime metaphorically speaking that this has not happened. The married couple were stalked and harassed by a Japanese firm in the Los Angeles area.leading them to file suit against the company. They had previously owned The Alamo School in Japan and the husband had written his thesis in aviation security prior to opening the school in Japan with his Japanese wife. They both attended a counseling center together in Los Angeles to overcome the harassment from the company and to help law enforcement who were cooperating with the center to investigate the crimes of the Japanese company. During their time in Japan, many Islamist terror attacks had occurred on Japanese soil which opened the question of our responsibility under terms of the treaty to protect Japan against foreign terror. As a civilian, I had never been deposed on my return to America after spending seven years in Japan. I requested the center to use their law enforcement connections to pass along information that I felt would be helpful to stopping terror attacks both in Asia and America. In other words, although we had a beef with the Japanese company that harassed us, the story of our meeting and the history behind our school demanded that we help Japan and America overcome the terrorists who were using Asia, to prepare for a massive attack against America using hijacked planes from Asian cities. This airline plot was first revealed in the Japanese press in 1995. As the plot was disrupted during this year, and a few arrests were made, it was obvious to us the plans may have changed, but the trajectory of their aim to hit America remained. I suggested looking in flight schools for the plotters fearing they had infiltrated them for the purpose of their attack. At the same time, we were making great strides in the course of therapy at the center, I was alarmed by attorney Gloria Allred's repeated calls to a legal insurrection against President Bush. At a time when we were calling for national unity, and even international unity, in stopping the plots, Gloria was obsessed with feeding her base of attorneys in California a drumbeat of protest and, if not outright war, then resistance. Why did this alarm me? I feared how much Gloria's persistent tirades over many months were affecting the attitudes of law enforcement and the center's managers where we were reporting our concerns (also in Los Angeles, next to LAX). I came from a family of Democrats and Republicans. Unlike Allred's portrayal, Bush was much more of a moderating influence than the unfit thief she daily portrayed. It was our experience together in Japan that was sorely needed at this time to shore up our security and we were freely offering it. Sadly, only weeks before the 9/11 attack, despite my repeated warnings, the center asked me to sign an additional release for the purpose of giving the counselor's notes to the attorneys for the Japanese company. It never occurred to me that the center was in contact with the attorneys for the company we were suing. The previous release I had signed was for the benefit of law enforcement. It is this connection that kept us attending the large center for over one year prior to 9/11, the hope that we were averting a disaster. The counselor encouraged us in this regard to make the best use of our time using their connections.I do not fault the counselor, as it is apparent to us that the center's managers were behind the shift that took place away from the center's responsibility to law enforcement with their directing of her to aid the American law firm representing Japan. The center's brand of politicking, aided by the far left, has had a devastating impact on my family and our country. However, there is a silver lining in this story. Images of Christ an Pi appeared within our home, leading my wife to the discovery Christ's Arrow of Time, Matthewave 935. In terms of its geometry, it is a striking match with Sir Roger Penrose's affirmation that the double orbit is key architectural component to the stability of spinors. It also matches Eric Weinstein's description of a geometry that mathematically reveals the essence of the Escher drawing of an artist's hand drawing the artist's hand in an eternal loop. Her model demonstrates that this regenerative geometry requires not one path, but an intersection of two, one peeling off the other at the location where orbital paths and expanding paths do not so much collide as they do merge and give birth ever so slightly, and gently to new generation paths of expansion and orbit. What's even more stunning is that this geometry matches Biblical description of God's throne room in Revelation 4, in The Molten Sea in 2 Kings 7 23, and many other passages from Phillipians 3 14 to Romans 15 12 where Paul refers back to Isaiah's mention of faith, not in the return of David, in a future messiah, but in the return of the Root of Jesse. Linguistically, we can trace this 'root' to Time's Arrow, and the 'word' inasmuch as the spoken word is also a wave in time, a reflection the one wave which is the hinge upon which all reality hangs. It is the dipole moment inherent to every subatomic particle, and otherwise described as the wave function. Kumiko's model delineates the wave function; it allows us to see His inner mechanics in beautiful detail. I purposefully say "His' rather than 'its' because, the startling find of time's arrow, is that it has a life-like quality, it is not an lifeless thing but as if a person with a life, this root has. Consider that the evolution of Christ's name from Iyesu (1935U) to Yeshua (935HUA) to Jesus (935US) carries a numerical root that extends to David's father, Jesse (93553). My wife Kumiko, would be a much more beautiful and agreeable guest to your audience. One day she began using '935' to sign her artwork and I asked why? She explained the numbers in Japanese, kyu, mitsu and go resemble in sound her name Ku mi ko. Another fascinating likeness in her name is its kanji characters which translate as forever, beauty, and child. Is it not an apt description of the wave she discovered that matches Penrose's architecture, Weinstein's words, Weinberg's prediction of a new theory of everything, and Einstein's belief in the one-way march of Time's Arrow and the importance of positivity to one's production in life.

[@robertdargan1113]

If you must hyjack a comments section of a podcast to write a book, please go somewhere else. Also, write something relevant to the podcast that's possibly interesting.

[@PrinceBlake]

@@robertdargan1113 It's spelled, 'hijack'. Like "Hi, Jack!" Only one word. One would hope the country being hijacked would cause you more worry. Neither side is uplifting, elevating the debate, offering new avenues of exploration. But these ideas can be explored in this format. Jewish and Christian and Muslim ideas of masculinity and femininity bear sorting out. The story of the delivery to Israel of 5 red heifers from Texas could be discarded as a myth building or it can be understood in the context of Christian and Jewish reconciliation. Radical Muslims expressed anger over this symbolic gesture. These religious differences are worth sorting through and the mathematical discovery of Time's Arrow has arrived at the right time to help us move the ball forward.

[@garak55]

I dunno, they had a candidate that young men liked, Bernie was polling in front of trump both times in that demographic. I don't think there's anything inherently in the dna of liberal politics that needs to be repulsive to young men, they just need to actualy make an argument to them.

[@RedMage117]

The problem is the left has shifted too far left. Classic liberals would now be considered right wing. Being anti-war, anti big pharma and anti-establishment is now right wing. Thats how far the progressives have pushed left.

[@bumpupsapp]

Hey Everyone 🤠 Find the parts that interest you: 0:00 - Discussing the eraser of past suffering 1:00 - Election focus on masculinity and voting 2:30 - Tim Walz as a unique VP candidate 5:00 - Representation matters in political campaigns 7:33 - Discussion on masculinity in politics 9:40 - Young men feel shunned by Democrats 10:41 - Democrats fail to acknowledge men's issues 12:50 - Infrastructure bill benefits working-class men Chat with videos via Bumpups 🌲

[@golanheights9000]

Not here for Tampon Tim glaze.

[@EGH181]

Wasn’t LBJ a school teacher?

[@christopherflanagan9626]

1:34 please stop misleadingly calling depriductive rights reproductive rights. A reproductive right is the right to reproduce.

[@robertdargan1113]

A reproductive "right" is the right to choose to reproduce. Freedom of choice, not forcing women to reproduce when they don't want to. Would be a man telling us what reproductive rights are,& getting it wrong!

[@NAVEE171]

good video yet again, I would only add for people to read 'Magnetic Aura' from Talesio helped me a tonnn

[@HEAVYDIAPER]

Hey Chris, could you please get Olympic Gold Medalist Kurt Angle on the podcast?