Vortex Impact 4000- Initial Impressions!

[@danielnagy6713]

Guys out here casually dropping the best long distance videos on KZbin

[@MountainsMulletsMerica]

Haha thank you for taking the time to watch and drop a compliment! Lots more content like this in the works so hope you’ll stay tuned to check what I’ve got in the works. Also do me a factor and share word of the channel with your buddies!

[@johnwalter6410]

His vids are solid for sure. Have you seen Rex's sniper 101 vids?

[@DirtyMechanicG35]

Right! Very methodical, step by step easy to understand.

[@ErikP0440]

He sure is

[@tbaylo4034]

😂

[@CKprecision]

The flow of your videos are getting so good dude. You are by far my favorite gun guy on KZbin. I hope nothing but greater success for you. Thank you for all the knowledge you share with us.

[@MountainsMulletsMerica]

Thank you! Really appreciate the compliments and the support! I’m making a legitimate effort to grow this channel so you should start seeing lots of new content through year end…. My hope is that every video gets better than the last one and provides the viewer some kind of valuable takeaway. Hope you’ll stay tuned and don’t forget to share my channel with your buddies!

[@williamgittins4770]

Awesome review on the Impact 4000. You are very clear and concise in your explanations of the equipment you are using and how you are using it. I’m sold! Looks like a real game changer for long range rifle shooting. You have the most incredibly beautiful “range” and scenery to exercise the 2nd amendment. Keep that content coming!

[@rossauce12]

I can't get over that view

[@ajbuschm]

I think you may have misunderstood how the divergence of the laser from your line of sight works. If your line of sight and the laser are both a straight line and they are 3 inches apart on the gun and 3 inches apart at 100 yards then they are also 3" apart at every other distance. So at 500 yards you'd only need to aim about .2 mills under your intended ranging target to have your laser centered on the target. At 1,000 yards it would be within .1 mils of your center cross hair etc... This is why Vortex recommends to zero it this way. The farther away you range the closer the laser is to your center cross hair. This is a simple case of mixing up a fixed offset with a fixed angular subtension. In the video you were likely picking up the ground at the bottom of the 1,000 yard target and most other targets with the laser so it still gives an accurate range and holdover. Anyways, great shooting.

[@devindonnahoe5217]

just so everyone is aware, the zero point of the rangefinder is set Independently from the reticule of the scope. As stated in the video, they are not meant to converge (also meaning they are not meant to diverge). Utilizing it in the method portrayed in the video will result in inaccurate readings. This is worth adding a disclaimer in the video as the consequences could be rather drastic. For example, in the video he states that a proper zero from the reticule is .8 Mils at 100 yards, Which would equate to roughly 2.88 inches *(at 100 yards). Assuming the Height Over Bore (Rather the line of sight through the center of the scope -A.K.A crosshairs) is 2.88 Inches below the Line of sight of the IR/visible Laser that fires to take the range reading this is the proper setup and will always accurately return a reading of 100 Yards when he uses the .8 Mil mark in the scope. BUT ONLY AT 100 YARDS. At distance continuing to use the .8 mil mark in the scope will return an incorrect reading as you would ultimately be ranging in front of the target you are trying to hit. Basically Mil and MOA are both angular measurements and you can think of them as "expanding" at distance. We've established that .8 mils At 100 yards is 2.88 inches, but at 200 yards .8mils is 5.76 inches, At 500 yards .8mils is 14.4 inches, and at 1000 yards .8 mills is 28.8 inches, ETC... As the line of sight of the scope is independent of the Vis/IR laser for the rangefinder (meaning they do not converge or diverge, rather they remain in parallel), the original distance measurement would still apply, not the angular measurement taken via the reticule. The Rangefinder will always return a reading from 2.88 Inches above the centerline (crosshairs) of your scope. The correct way to range these targets at distance would be to put them in the crosshairs (as long as your scope is still zeroed at the original 100 yard mark) and take a range, rather then continue to use the .8 Mil mark as he does in the video. This worked well for him in the video, and will probably work well in most target applications as they typically have some sort of immediate backdrop to catch rouge bullets. But where this can be dicey is for anyone utilizing this tool in a hunting application, as often times deer do not have an immediate backdrop and have a significant amount of "negative space" between the portion you are trying to hit and the ground. in theory, you could ultimately range under the deer's body, and actually return a range 100 yards (or more/less) behind it from a hill, tree, or other animal resulting in a missed shot or worse, a wounded deer. All this to say, great video showcasing this piece of exciting new tech to an industry that has been rather underserved by our modern capability's in electronics and computing. Glad to see you showing it to your audience and I will be subscribing to see more videos from you in the future! (Edited for understanding)

One thing he adjusted his turet, did he not say that you should only use holdover

[@deadmenwalkingsavtheusa7594]

Yes he did.@

[@deadmenwalkingsavtheusa7594]

Can you put this in a really simple terms? or are you a lawyer.

[@devindonnahoe5217]

@@deadmenwalkingsavtheusa7594 if you copy the methodology in the video for set-up, just use your crosshairs to range the target PRIOR to adjusting the turrets. If you need to range again, return the scope to the original zero setting put your crosshairs on the target and take a range, then readjust the turrets to the output of the RF. The rangefinder will always return a distance measurement 2.88 inches above the center dot of your crosshair (given its set to the original hundred yard zero) regardless of how far away what your ranging is. (A laser does not follow a parabolic flight path, rather is a straight line from A-B) if your scope already has adjustment dialed in to the turret your ranging significantly higher/lower from your point of aim. Let me know if this helps.

[@Kismetix]

@@deadmenwalkingsavtheusa7594 in other words, just make sure the line of sight through the scope and the visible laser are as parallel as possible. You don't want them to converge or diverge, because the vortex laser will depart from the scope reticle and measure some other distance (than what is in the scope crosshairs).

[@BraedonBriscoe]

Great review! I wanted to note that holding .8 mils under your target is not correct unless you are at 100 yards. The offset will always be 3 inches, but .8 mils is not always 3 inches offset. Holding slightly low (3 inches) is not a bad thing to insure that you're ranging the correct target and not over the top, but that mechanical offset doesn't change with distance like the mil does. 10:40

[@hajduk_lives]

.8 mile at 100y is 3”-ish, but .8 at further distances is not. Angular measurements are going to increase at further distances.

[@CountryWolf_TX]

I have no mountains, I have no mullet but I have plenty of ‘Merica! 🌲🇺🇸🌲

[@ledeni012]

Well done! My personal impression is that this is the most complete and informative presentation of this thing that I have seen so far. Although... You looked a little bit weird as you flipped and spun the Impact 🤣

[@veracitysolutionsllc]

Quality video on this awesome device. However your ranging method of holding .8 MIL is incorrect. While zeroing and confirming at 100y is fine. The zero of the WMLRF is NOT angular. It is always just 3” high (or however high it is over centerline of optic), it’s not relatable in MILS outside of your zero distance.

[@sethgoodwin7397]

User name checks out. I think people sometimes forget mils and moa marks are angle measuring tools and not height measuring tools.

[@rangerdanger126]

Great review and demo of this awesome tool. Thank you for educating me and all your viewers. Merica! RLTW!

[@NiteQwill_]

Man, it's hard to find videos on KZbin that give great reviews. You're an exception! Great video. Complete, to the point, and easy to follow. I agree. As an owner of an unlocked RAPTAR, the Impact 4000 brings something to the market that most people were not aware of (or could not afford). I have since moved to the Impact 4000 as it offers me more in a better, lifetime-warranty package. First time subscriber here!

[@cantquit1109]

Love, your videos !!’ You keep making and I’ll keep watching. Could the difference in how much you tightened the vortex have caused the non return to zero?

[@MountainsMulletsMerica]

You know that’s a great point and something I didn’t even think about. Yes it’s very possible inconsistent torque is what lead to the poi shift. Might have to grab a torque wrench and try the poi shift test again sometime.

[@rossauce12]

Wtf like the most epic background in the world

[@lesterdelvalle3690]

This dude needs to have 1M subscribers

[@RockinRack]

I got their fury binoculars with applied ballistics so i can use it with multiple rifles without buying new mounts or setting it up every time i use a different rifle. If you have one dedicated lr rifle though being able to range right off your rifle is the way to go. Ill wait for holosun to come out with their version half price and half the size lol

[@TweakRacer]

Would love to see you review the Burris Eliminator 5 LaserScope, for those of us that just need a solution for a single long range rifle. 😬

[@ImNoBSING]

2K is very good price for that. I am using kestrel paired with sig RF and it is sick for spotter-shooter work. But handheld finders are quite hard to use and have a lot of learning curve. Being able to range precisely and have a stable position helps the rangefinder also. The wind in northern europe is rarely coming from a certain angle, the terrain and wind conditions usually create difficulties getting a good estimate for first round hits, compared to rare winter and summer days when the wind actually is predictable /steady. How did you like the ergonomics of using that thing that high up the rifle? Did you try it in gear? Because it seems like a bit cumbersome to operate with stuff on. Even kestrel is not easy to use in winter time with its screen lagging from the cold.

[@wade7592]

Great video but your .8 low at distance ranging method is incorrect.

[@MountainsMulletsMerica]

Nah, seemed to work perfectly and is exactly in line with what vortex does with their zero target

[@veracitysolutionsllc]

@@MountainsMulletsMericait is incorrect.

[@sethgoodwin7397]

​@@MountainsMulletsMerica the zero was good, but it was a parallel zero meaning the laser and the center of your dot are parallel forever. You were ranging on a diverging zero (.8mil at your gun vs ~3in at the target). It didn't hurt you because all your targets you shot were backstopped by large berms, so errors were small compared to your danger space.

[@someoneelse1385]

Excellent explanation of the practical use of this device. Thank you for the effort that you put into these videos, and thank you for being upfront and honest about free gear/ammo when provided.

[@MountainsMulletsMerica]

Appreciate you taking the time to watch! I’m having a blast creating content for the channel and really enjoy all the support I’ve received lately. Part of growth is working with companies on various products… certainly I want to capitalize on these opportunities but I want the viewer to have a fair understanding of everything when using my content to make a decision. Lots of new content in the works so hope you’ll stay tuned to check it out!

[@PrestigeW0rldWide-ux9zb]

Love your content, I agree the impact is awesome. Alot of them were on guns at major lands sniper cup, the winners had them.

[@Milspecpoptart]

We need to get this guy to 50k subs by the end of the year.

[@MountainsMulletsMerica]

That is a goal that I’m working toward. Lots of new content in the works between now and year end so hope you’ll stay tuned to check it out and don’t forget to share my content with your buddies! Thanks for watching

[@sreekrishnanmuralitharan520]

Great shooting as usual. Id like to see you shoot some 300/338 norma with the mrad. I hope you got those calibers with the MRAD kit

[@MountainsMulletsMerica]

I’ve got the 300nm barrel and actually launched a video earlier this year showing how it performed… check out the link below if you’re interested. Appreciate you taking the time to watch and support the channel! 300 Norma Mag in action….. The military’s new sniper round! kzbin.info/www/bejne/bHzRgnaeaa2Webc

[@mageman483]

That is some beautiful scenery in the background, great video! Had been considering this and your video was a huge help.

[@almoore6944]

I know I'm late, but thanks for posting this. Your delivery is very good. You're conversational and casual. I tried watching the Vortex video about this unit and it was un-watchable. The Vortex guy's delivery sounded like he was a hostage being forced to read a political statement at gunpoint. Horrible. So, now you have a new subscriber and I don't subscribe to anything. Nice work.

[@biggs8729]

So I just wanted to point out that your logic of holding .8 mills under the target is flawed. A mill is an angular unit of measurement, so at 100 yards .8 mils will be 3 inches but at 2000 yards .8 mills will be 60 inches which means you ranging an object 57 inches below your target. in the example of ranging the antelope, you were actually measuring the distance to the ground in front of the antelope. Essentially, after you zero, the rangefinder to your optic, you will simply put your crosshairs on the object you are ranging and probably the 3 inches doesn’t matter. If it does then just hold 3 inches low. Otherwise, I really enjoyed the video.

[@drewmerkley9384]

This is what I’ve been searching for thank you! This channel inspired me to go head first into long range!

[@MountainsMulletsMerica]

Really cool to hear you enjoyed the video and my content inspired you to get into long range! Long range shooting is epic but be warned it gets addicting and expensive haha

[@drewmerkley9384]

@@MountainsMulletsMerica lol I went full on with my first bolt, picked up an mrad and an atacr 7-35 looking at trying this 4000 out aswell

[@jeremytaylor4576]

Well if you remember you put in Windage for like 5mph left to right, and you were just ignoring the ballistics when shooting the first day. So maybe when you took it off, or before, you forgot 0 windsge? Then put it back on forgetting you had it set? Bc it’s was telling you 2-3 windage adjust but ignored them??

[@tbaylo4034]

It’s too bad that one of these optics companies doesn’t partner with Hornady and load their 4DOF calculator into a rangefinder. 🤞🏼

[@OsamaBinSmokinTV]

You're on fire!! If it had IR like the Wilcox Raptar, it'll be a home run. But I know that would just make it more expensive.

[@MachinegunJesus13]

What is the height of the Spuhr diving board? Is that the 35mm height? Thanks! Nice video.

[@andruha001]

Can you take this setup and join Texas' Plinking 1 MOA at 1,000 yard challenge?

[@Semi-J]

Every time when you change distance, you need to back down to 0 elevation and range distance….. Why not share this with viewer. If you are good, you can do the math subtract your dial from scope and find the range distance point within the scope view. On paper, it is great if you shoot at distance without dialing.

[@ScottJ.Palumbo]

Great Overview & Excellent shooting!!!

[@rossauce12]

Shouldn't have cheaped out on your rifle setup... buy once cry once... what is that a Barrett and a night force? Pshhhh

[@Kismetix]

For zeroing, why not just adjust so the laser and line of site are parallel? A 3" vertical offset between the laser and the line of sight isn't going to do anything to the ballistic calculation

[@ImNoBSING]

Tbh. If you shoot 5 rounds, you cannot afford to remove 1 shot, the whole point in measuring is to see how unreliable ammo is, not how reliable it is.

[@paytonwoodruff3621]

With hornady burning, we’re gonna have to find extra brands haha

[@MountainsMulletsMerica]

Im not a believer in random fliers…. Fliers are a part of the performance so I always include them when measuring groups.

[@Boon20]

Im curious what its limits are and what the beam divergence is. Im also interested to see a follow up video 5 or 6 months down the road to see what your thoughts are after time behind it.

[@d.t.f1353]

Is the screen not illuminated for dark days? If that's the case, it's expensive for an absent option

[@939forbidden]

I appreciate how thorough you are on all your videos, I have the Impact 4000 on my MRAD in 300 NM, I have not had a chance to get out with it yet, but you answered some questions I had. Thank you

[@plizzi3]

I’m curious how you will use it for different calibers in say your Barrett. Will you just save it as different rifles?

[@deadmenwalkingsavtheusa7594]

thank you good job!! But you give out free schooling and advice?

[@mobeus5019]

Sounds like that thing is very cumbersome to use and a pain to set up. I think for the cost, I am sticking to a handheld rangefinder.

[@CotyNeighbors]

Iv been waiting for the people I follow to put out content on this an here you are 3 months ago educating. Thank you very much 👍

[@MountainsMulletsMerica]

Stay tuned for my next video drop! Lots of fresh content impact 4000 footage headed your way!

[@InfamousTactical]

This is the direct benefit we see from a company like vortex getting a gov contract for the NGSW optic. Trickle down of awesome tech.

[@usmcn]

could it be mounted on the side of the rifle? This way you would never have to take it off in the case? Great review btw

[@kylewerner8651]

What kind of rifle clamp is that on the BOG tripod?

[@rossauce12]

U just plug in the distance and wind.. the device will then give you an effective impact

[@lyubko21]

Any issues installing the rangefinder onto Night Force?

[@WHOTEEWHO]

👍👍

[@Uminam3]

Great video, appreciate your content ad usual!!

[@kevinmann3063]

Great video… Do you have to use a 100 yard zero to zero the lazer on the unit? A lot of times I use a 50 yard zero…

[@sakofinland3421]

.8-.9" group is freaking horrible for that rig

[@amym828]

Not a game changer for me. I already have a device to compute my firing solutions and since I have multiple rifles, it would be ridiculous trying to zero this thing every time I want to use it on a different rifle.

[@MountainsMulletsMerica]

The downside to rifle mounted range finders is for sure having to rezero them every time you moved them around. I typically try to leave something like this on the rifle that I shoot most often so I’m not constantly having to rezero. Of course as I type this in planning to swap this to a different rifle for filming today haha

[@chef6782]

Great video.How the price is dropping.Is because there are not selling.I do not see a lot of them on peoples gun at the club i go to?

[@Lordporter1]

Great work here, thank you from all of us

[@texasoutlaw210]

Hate math I guess I’ll never shoot long distance 🤣

[@danielforrest3871]

Interesting.

[@TacticalConsiderations]

great video brother.

[@MountainsMulletsMerica]

Appreciate it! I had a blast putting this one together.

[@poorfatman5317]

I think you would be better off with a Buris scope

[@hammbone852]

Would it fit in the case if you got new foam and cut it yourself?

[@sveinsoermo9883]

Yes, it will; excellent video, as always!

[@Big6Duke]

How does it tie into wind calls can you pair it to a Kestrel?

[@Mrtjw]

I’m not 100% on the .8 hold under. Makes sense using that to zero the laser, but it would be a converging angle too… like zeroing to the reticle. At 200 yards, .8 is going to be 6 inches, at 300 it’ll be 9 inches etc. so technically that 3 inch offset will get closer to zero. But it’s always going to be 3 inches… if that makes sense? Regardless of that, rad video 🔥

[@MountainsMulletsMerica]

Yes, you are correct there. Several other commenters mentioned this early on so I adjusted how I was using the laser when series and it’s been working spot on since then. Instead of .8 under at distance I just use the center of the crosshairs

[@robertschulze7881]

Can you do a video with it side mounted I want to get one but want to see it side mounted not on top of the scope

[@Sierra_Victor]

Love the content. Very impressive for what looks like a one man show. One question on the laser zero, won’t the .8mil hold for ranging change as distance increases? 3 inches measured in Mils will change dramatically from 100yd to 1,000.

[@MountainsMulletsMerica]

Great question and you would be right if you don’t get the zero process correct. What I’m showing in the video is a parallel zero. The laser sits 3” above the center of my scope and at 100yds 3” equates to .8 mils. So if I’m able to zero the laser perfectly at .8mils above my crosshair then I have a perfect parallel zero on the laser. Say you zero the laser to your crosshair at 100yds vs the .8 high…. That’s when you would have major error as you get to distance because your laser is set to converge with your crosshair at such a close distance. Hopefully I was able to explain that clearly, let me know if that didn’t make sense haha

[@royd-l]

@@MountainsMulletsMerica Also had a question along these lines because I was confused about the .8 mil hold for ranging. If the laser has a parallel zero with a 3" offset, wouldn't you just hold center reticle at sufficiently long ranges? For example, a 3" offset at 1000 yards would be 0.08 mils (3"/36"), which is effectively the center of the reticle. Maybe I'm misunderstanding something here.

[@sethgoodwin7397]

​@@royd-l you are correct.

[@stefen1946]

A month late, but thatnks for a great video.

[@Godfryness]

Great review. Thank you

[@rolandwhitlock2684]

As usual, concise, informative commentary.

[@briansmith6911]

Nice review, very helpful, Me Covet :)

[@emorelix]

45 extreme deviation is horrible.

[@stevedavis1850]

Where is it made? I’ve been trying to find out if it is China made, but it seems to be a secret! Not trying to knock it, I just haven’t had any luck with equipment that isn’t made in US, Germany, or Japan.

[@mareklehmann293]

Taiwan

[@hk93shooter]

my question is this that much better than a kestrel5700 and a sig 4000 k. ? its more money and it is one nice little mounted package , but is it that much better?, faster? also how does it compare to the older barrett boars set up. i have not purchased any of these but have friends with them so a little hands on.

[@mareklehmann293]

Considering that you can range through your scope to fire, I would say speed is much faster vs handling a handheld

[@viktorlitvinskiy2059]

Can I change yards to meters?

[@tannormathias2488]

How does it do at different angles

[@the.original.throwback]

The Vortex Impact 4000 is one more step toward a rifle scope that includes ranging, BDC, windage allowance, and automatic reticle adjustment to target. It may even eventually include an optional AI target identification and automatic trigger actuation when all parameters align. Just send out your Tesla Optimus robot to bring in the venison, cleaned, wrapped, and cooked to perfection.

[@Pew_pewchronicles]

I have the razor 4000 GB works great but on this one unless I’m wrong I don’t think it would serve my purposes if every time I’m going to use it on a different Rifle I have to zero the rangefinder to the new Rifle

[@rangerdanger126]

That's an excellent point. I did not think about that. Switching could be a pain. But as shown, taking it off and reattaching to the same rifle could cause issues. But if you have one main long range rifle, this would be spot on. I have been looking hard at the 4000 GB myself. Bushnell was supposed to release the same type of rangefinder, with built in Ballistic data. But they cannot seem to figure out when or if to release. Probably too many issues. I use the Match Pro for NRL22 and wanted to stay with them. The 4000 GB is a little out of my price point at the moment.

[@Pew_pewchronicles]

@@rangerdanger126 well the razor 4000 GB has the same software Ballistics that’s in the 4000 impact. I have too many Rifles to be taking it off one putting it on a different one and having to rezero that’s too much of a hassle, the razor 4000 GB works great

[@The_Disaster_Box]

Man, I love this channel, but I'm sooo jealous of the land you have to shoot in. I'm lucky if I can get out to 300 yards in Western Wa. Keep up the good work, I've learned a lot from you.

[@xupermagnum12]

a little off topic but which vertical grip do you have on the MRAD?

[@MountainsMulletsMerica]

I’m pretty sure it’s the ergo tdx 0 in FDE

[@rossauce12]

Nice background

[@freddyw4555]

Did you range your license plate because it would not range with the bright sun

[@MountainsMulletsMerica]

That is correct. Had to find something reflective so I could see the laser in the sun.

[@namenotfound8747]

For 2 grand, would you feel comfortable leaving it on your MRAD? I wouldn’t mind leaving it on my rifle if the housing is up to snuff. Basically if you accidentally trip or fall, do you feel it will break?

[@huntersmark917]

Thank you for this. Great video. You got a new subscriber. I will be buying this.

[@charlesmullins3238]

Man I shot 1 hole with n560 and 135 a tips in 6.5prc…got 95gr v max goin 3625fps and grouping well no pressure….58gr h4350

[@wanabesailer9599]

How would that Vortex impact 4000 compare to the Burris Eliminator 5? I have the Eliminator 5 mounted on my 6.5

[@johnwalter6410]

You shoot long range with factory loads? Really?

[@MountainsMulletsMerica]

All the time…. Why would I not?

[@ftn5546]

Thanks for the good review. I would love to see more verifications of ballistic solutions between 600 and 1400 yards on non-reflectivd targets.

[@canoerichie1]

Does this have to be mounted on top of your scope, could it be mounted on the side of your rifle?

[@MountainsMulletsMerica]

You can mount to the side of the rifle no problem

[@jameskennedy4984]

Excellent video as usual great information on an item I’m interested in. Viewer made a good point on the offset 3” offset will be about .1 mill (I think) at 1000yds, but you were spot on about using your 100 yard zero to range. Good job, hope to see more from you soon.😊

[@aresonance]

Great video. On the subject on the gear review type video: Fantastic pacing. Didn’t go full reading a spec sheet and explained what bullets you were working with. Easily digestible shooting footage and my respect went up when you stated your misses. If I was in the market for a range finder, this video would have sold me on one. The vortex nation podcast gets douchey and Texas hunters podcast gets kinda rambling. Looking forward to future content.

[@Frindleeguy]

1- you're pretty good. 2- that thing's impressive. Those first shot impacts are very nice. 3- probably not too far away from an AI scope that 'moves' the reticle for you. This is halfway there it seems.

[@ImNoBSING]

Important question: How well it holds the compass calibration? Because even Kestrels get easily messed up, I frequently have to calibrate it.

[@TheWinterfan]

If I won the lottery and pulled a big horned sheep tag, then I'd prob spring for one... Anything to help me not waste a once-in-a-lifetime tag. Otherwise, it's pretty overkill for me. Good vid!

[@BigGamePursuit]

For hunting application do you recommend the impact 4000 or the fury 4000 with AB?

[@patdufresne6209]

A non bias comparison between their system and Sig's BDX would be interesting. I find that Vortex's system makes it big and clunky in the field. More likely to bump it on something.

[@ryanwolfe9794]

Awesome review! Think it’s already been said but the reason for zeroing the laser .8 mils above the reticle at 100yds is so it maintains a consistent zero 3 inches above POA and that distance stays the same at all distances, only being .8mils at 100yds

[@tomjjackson21]

I'm so torn on this. I have the Sico Radius on a few rifles, and tbh its pretty mediocre. How would you say this compares to the Radius? i think i'm just going to pick one up after seeing this. It seems as if they've found a way to remedy some of the shortcomings the Radius suffered from. Plus its in gucci fde, and has that service rifle aesthetic. It looks really great, but I keep trying to remind myself that your skillset exceeds the vast majority of shooters. Given the legislation did you leave ol Wa? This looks like its somewhere in the southwest. I don't think we have antelope here in Wa.

[@johnbrodnax1610]

Best video That I have seen on the range finder. I will be using this for long-range precision shooting for a big bore airgun known as the Airforce Texan LSS .50 with custom-made bullets looking to break the next big airgun shot in long range. Im looking forward to receiving it in the mail. Thank you for going into detail again. This is the best video on this range finder.

[@nitride_spear1729]

Bro is literally reading my mind and reviewing the gear I want reviewed

[@MountainsMulletsMerica]

Love it! Glad to hear you enjoyed this one!

[@ابوسعدالضالعي-ص4ح]

I want to learn how to find the ballistic coefficient of a shot, so I can enter the shot data?

[@MountainsMulletsMerica]

The vast majority of bullet manufacturers will publish bc information for their bullets online. Should be able to google and find what you need.