Mumbai slum rehab government's new game plan?

The Maharashtra Government chalks out a new strategy to fastrack slum rehabilitation projects in Mumbai. Exclusive inputs on this big policy initiative.
www.ndtv.com/vi...

[@claudiosaltara8847]

A new game should be to devote two floors of every new building in Bombay for evicted slum dwellers at government expense or developers’. See how it works, it was never done before, so it can be a pilot project for India and the world. See how much heart the city will put into it. If you put into a new building all slum dwellers that building will become a slum in few years for lack of maintenance (see Hong Kong). A small industrial park can be reserved for artisan to continue their work for livelihood (supervised by the city for healthy working conditions). Let see how city planners are inventive in this pilot project.

[@mujeebg603]

GOVERNMENT TAKE STREAK ACTION IN THIS ISSUE AND REHAB ALL AFFECTED PEOPLES ,SLUM ARE SO CLOSE TO AIRPORTAREA ITS A DANGEROUS FOR AIRPORT AUTHORITY,PLEASE KEEP DISTANCE DIRTY POLITICS FOR THIS ISSUE

[@Iam_rahulshetty]

My house is demolished in Andheri East area sakinaka pipeline...the are not given house to everyone... pipeline area was demolished Jan 2018 most of the people are Lost there house...and living in small sheds..some people who able to live in rental house which cost is 6k per month..10x10ft area small house.. but gov ..is sucks 😫😫 I am 20 year old wanted to complete my degree...but because of my house rent,... I am working now.. facing lot of struggle because of this gov...I am supporting modi...but not this gov..most of the politicians are just want earn money only...there are so many people Lost there own house and now thay are facing lots of problem...(sorry for this bad English 😔

[@ganeshkhot7265]

Kindly watch the video Redevelopment mhada.Tnk u Ganesh khot

[@bhushanbhoir2267]

people living in slums are not the owners of those land...they are just people came from other places and built their huts and now claiming those land as their..how????...60% mumbai are populated by slums and now those slum people demands for proper houses from government and the government are giving them offers..stupid and unfair???

[@bookwalanajmudin]

14 10/7/2002 Asst. Municipal Comm. H/W Ward’s letter to Harshad K.D. asking to submit the original and zerox copies of documents mentioned therein. 15 02/12/2003 Asst. Municipal Comm. H/W Ward’s letter to Harshad K.D. once again requesting to produce the xerox copies of agreements of slum dwellers of subject property. 16 18/03/2005 Architect Harshad K.D.’s letter to The Colony Officer, H/W Ward forwarding the copies of correspondence between the various Department and also Layout of proposed development. 17 23/03/05 Asstt. Comm.”s letter to Architect Harshad KD informing the issuance of Annexure-II for Shastri Nagar CHS consisting 827 hutment dwellers by Addl. Collector (Enc./Rem) MSD. Therefore the Architect’s request of Annexure-II for proposed SRA Scheme on the plot cannot be considered. 18 11/04/05 Harshad KD Architect’s letter to Ex Engg, H/W Ward forwarding correspondence held with various authorities and requesting not to entertain any other Developers proposal for the same plot. 19 23/09/2005 Harshad KD Architect’s letter to AMC, H/W Ward, Bandra stating that the proposal of subject property pending since more than 8 years and there has been number of correspondences between the Architect and Govt. bodies and Consent of Members of the Society to give approvals and permissions to the society. 20 1/10/2005 BMC’s letter to SRA for its directives on the ongoing inquiry by BMC of the proposal submitted by the society’s architect and two new separate proposals received from other developers for the subject property. 20 06/10/2005 Minutes of Meeting of Housing Department/SRA regarding development of plot at Bandra bearing CTS No. A/110 (pt) in favour of the architect of the society. 21 17/10/2005 Architect’s letter to Shri Dayanand Mashke, Housing Minister confirming the joint meeting held between them. It was also confirmed that the proposal submitted by the Aavas Corporation in the year 1996 is prior to any other scheme. Lastly requesting other government authorities to call a final meeting regarding development of the subject property. 22 26/12/2005 Intimation letter of Housing Department to all the government authorities about the meeting for permission of development of CTS No.110(pt). 23 2.1.2006 Notice was dispatched to the concerned departments - SRA, BMC, Addl. Collector (Encr./Rem.), Chief Promoter of the society, AAVAS corporation and the architect of the society to attend an urgent meeting in the chamber of Ministry of State for Housing on 12.1.2006 @ 12.30 p.m. 23 12/01/2006 Meeting held in the Chamber of Ministry of State for Housing and attended by all. An order was passed stating that “Hon. Minister directed SRA to reopen proposal of AAVAS Const. & write to BMC. BMC to consider all 5 applications including AAVAS Const. & decide the deve. Of Annexure II.” Inspite of the said order of the Housing Minister our proposal was not re-opened and no letter was written in this respect to BMC. 24 6/2/2006 Architect’s letter to Ex. Engg., SRA asking to reopen or reinstate the file of the subject matter as per the Order of Hon. State Minister Shri Maske. 25 30/8/2010 Society’s letter to Addl. Mun. Comm. (Projects), MCGM requesting for a meeting with Asst. Comm. H/W Ward, Asst. Comm. (Estate) to reopen the matter of Annexure-II. 26 11/04/2011 Architects letter to The Director, MRTS regarding remarks of effect of proposal MRTS to the plot bearing CTS Nos. A/96 to A/125 of Village Bandra. 13. My clients state that the reasons given by SRA for closing our scheme filed was their failure to submit NOC of Chief Engineer (D.P.) which is incorrect as, as per the SRA Guidelines and Rules framed therein no such NOC is required to be submitted. The M.C.G.M. through their Asst. Commissioner, H/West Ward has issued the Annexure-II for Maharashtra Nagar no. 1A, 1B, 1C and 1D CHS. The schemes accepted by SRA & Annexure-II issued thereof by M.C.G.M. on the said plots are without considering the original conditions of M.C.G.M. to construct a Municipal office under Composite Scheme and to obtain NOC from MCGM. 14. My clients state that the society on 4.11.2011 held a General Body Meeting of the slum dwellers on the said property in respect of development under Slum Rehabilitation scheme. Accordingly, in the General Body Meeting of the slum dwellers they have reconfirmed the appointment of the developer and passed Resolutions in favour of the AAVAS Corporation and their partner. 15. In view of the foregoing paragraphs and under the circumstances, I am hereby instructed by my client to call upon you which I hereby do not to consider the proposal of Grace Property India Pvt. Ltd. and or give further permission and approvals without giving proper hearing to my clients, failing which my client will be compelled to take appropriate legal action against you and all the other authorities. Please further note that in the event of your failure to comply with the above my client would also be compelled to give the deliberate lapses and non compliance of the orders of the Housing Minister committed on your part a wide publicity in the media. You as the Government Body looking after planned development of Mumbai City have to ensure that the persons are not penalized or prejudiced by unwarranted steps. Yours faithfully, (Mrs Kavita Mohan Kutty) Advocate

[@hai101277]

Mô hình mà Ấn Độ cần theo là big goverment theo đó chính phủ sở hữu các nhà máy thép và xi măng, sau đó phát hành trái phiếu ra công chúng để có tiền xây dựng hệ thống hạ tầng và nhà cao tầng sau đó bán lại cho dân

[@akshaykate8030]

apne watan ke mitti par Sarkar to hai chutti par