My review of Fedora 40 KDE, as someone that doesn't like fedora KDE spin, this is not bad

my review of Fedora 40 KDE. It is rather nice to be honest, but I still don't like the installer.

[@plutorocks1]

Been eagerly waiting for you to review Fedora KDE spin. You did a good job for listening to us. Thanks

[@manw3bttcks]

I'm on Fedora 40 KDE spin and just updated to 6.1.2 and it seems to be doing pretty well.

[@johnandmegh]

12:30

[@vladimir_fomin90]

waiting for a review of Nobara

[@oscs4556]

For dual boot installs, it’s better to use the custom install for Fedora. Also, fedora and OpenSuse handle btrfs sub volumes differently; OpenSuse does it the correct way. Fedora is going have a new web based next next style installer in the next versions and also dnf 5 with fast parallel downloads too. The only fedoras I like are aurora-dx and bazzite; both immutable systems.

[@k0zum4]

Fedora's installer truly is a pain when it comes to beginner-level users, and even some experienced users, mostly because you need to learn how to deal with it, and the fact that there are key details missing in the installer, such as the RPM Fusion repositories management, also makes the installation process more difficult. Personally, even with all its issues, I still believe that Fedora is one of the best distros for people with moderate understanding of Linux that want a moderately stable experience while staying ahead in software availability. Fedora 40 was a major step in improvement compared to previous releases, but it is far from being perfect.

[@timfd.w.4163]

About TW Discover asking for passwords while updating just add yorself to the wheel group. And about that Fedora off-line update boot just set it inside TB settings. Works the sabe

[@billpapadopoulos9650]

fedora kde plasma 6 wayland is very buggy i tried switching to plasma x11 but everything just freezes when it boots up. kde plasma 6 works great for me on manjaro