My Stance on Daniel Haqiqatjou [Madkhalis vs Khawarij]

My Stance on Daniel Haqiqatjou [Madkhalis vs Khawarij]
Your support helps the dawah, jazakumAllahukhairan 🤝:
❤️ Patreon: / ilmstitute
GoFundMe: www.gofundme.c...
PayPal: www.paypal.me/...
CashApp: cash.app/$Brot...
KZbin Membership: / @saajidlipham
📚 Islamic Classes: courses.ilmsti...
👕 Merch! (shirts, hoodies, etc.): teespring.com/...
🔗 Social Media:
📱 Facebook: / brothersaajid
📱 Twitter: / saajidlipham
📷 Instagram: / brothersaajid
💻 Website: www.ilmstitute.com
🔈 Soundcloud: / user-1260072
🔈 Podcast: itunes.apple.c...

[@rooshaa6274]

Prophet Muhammad ﷺ said: "The best Jihad is a word of truth in front of an oppressive ruler." (Tirmidhi)

[@أبوشغل]

So Daniel should go to the ruler and speak the truth then. How is talking about their faults online going to do anything? Where is the jihad in that?

[@rooshaa6274]

He will immediately be executed if he does that. So that's not a viable option.

[@barryirlandi4217]

Ok.. So go to him and say it to him.. Otherwise be quiet

[@barryirlandi4217]

@@revivalist355 that's DH problem..

[@rooshaa6274]

@@barryirlandi4217 where does it say it's forbidden to criticize rulers? Especially if they are as corrupt and unislamic as mbs and mbz?

[@yousufbinmohammad9761]

The whole issue arose when DH criticized KSA for Halloween and people started labelling him khariji, is it incorrect to criticize a ruler for openly promoting pagan rituals among Muslims?

[@aaliyah3037]

First of all you don't even know if the government permitted the event. Secondly, rulers are to be advised privately as per the hadith of the prophet upon whom be peace.

[@محمد-ك8ر9ث]

@@aaliyah3037 The government is promoting much worse events through هيئة الترفيه and are imprisoning any sheikh that is simply opposing haram without even talking about the so called “rulers”

[@aaliyah3037]

@@محمد-ك8ر9ث Scholars have always been imprisoned by rulers throughout the history of Islam. This is nothing new. Everyone will answer for their actions on the day of judgement but we must follow the sunnah of prophet upon whom be peace.

[@محمد-ك8ر9ث]

@@aaliyah3037 Do you know the difference between imprisoning scholars because the ruler is unjust and imprisoning them because they are fighting the spread of kufr? If the ruler is unjust this doesn’t mean that you can rebel against him but if he is a murtad that destroys the religion then you HAVE TO! (I’m against rebellions btw☺️) You talk about the Sunnah so much but have no khaira غيرة to defend islam against distortion!

[@maazmustafa2322]

@@محمد-ك8ر9ث Then please start rebelling against the ruler in your country. I'm sure things are worse there and have been for a longer time than Saudi. Places in the gulf, Turkey, Malaysia, the former USSR states , European muslim nations all have worse going on for years now

[@rinopw4262]

Didn't Daniel only start like a couple of days ago, why has this become such a big issue 😂. I think most of Daniel's work is still on liberalism, such a shame you would take down his good work that you still agree with..

[@howtowithassitan9752]

wallahi

[@abdejabbarhaddadoui268]

Daniel haqiqatjou is less harmful to the ummah than those that worship the rulers who build idols build temples and promote shirk. May allah curse be upon those that worship the rulers.The prophet may peace and blessing be upon him warned against them and those who will do shirk

[@philipscorn9006]

Daniel didn't make any takfir. He condemn all sorts of violence against the rulers. The so-called "harmless criticism" is haram according to the hadiths so please stop using emotional appeal. Actually, it's not harmless because you are inciting violence (even though he condemns it) just as the liberals are inciting freedom when they unwantedly (like Daniel) incite the destruction of society.

[@ManhaJSalafee]

No one warship rulers .. shhay Rabee Al-madkhali, Shaykh Fawzan never supported anything wrong done by rulers .. But

[@xshiro83]

I have watched few videos of real learned ulamas..most of them said similar to what brother Saajid have explained. Muslims please do your research. Look at syria, libya and yaman..anything good come from rebellions? People are more divided than before. They used to have beautiful country people able to practice the religion now what happened. Children died from hunger and other bad things happen to muslims.

[@alia-wm8ug]

@@xshiro83 you think Muslims were better off before The wars? Do you not see the corruption all around the world since over 100 years? If the objective in Islam is to prevent war and suffering then why did the prophet and his followers go through a lot of war and suffering? Allah says corruption/trials/fitna is worse then death. Protecting your faith is more important than to die as a kafir or even a bad Muslim.

[@Ryan-lf6ds]

@@xshiro83 "Look at syria, libya and yemen." yea n i saw wahhabi munafiqs.

[@W67w]

Hold on, so DH is not qualified to criticise rulers, so why were you silent when he was criticising duatt? Was he qualified for that?

[@Kolesha]

DH isn't Khawarij he never spoke against the prophet or Sahaba as the Khawarij you gave examples of. So you made a fallacy; it was a false comparison. I don't understand why you'd bring up these examples since DH has absolutely nothing to do with it.

[@Kolesha]

Also, the Jews rebelled against the Seleucids and this only did them good for they were severely oppressed by the Grecians. People don't rebel for no reason. They do so because they are oppressed and they want to improve their conditions. Your claim that rebellion is always or most of the time futile is simply ahistorical.

[@Kolesha]

Do you regard a ruler who bombs the crap out of a country populated by Muslims, and working together with the Zionists, as a kaafir? It looks like you don't just because that ruler claims to perform salah. Is that seriously the criteria we have to go by?

[@247artsnsourcing6]

Since when criticism is khurooj?

[@khengari77]

Since when was it not

[@banismoh7817]

Imagine if scholar said bad things on ruler on public in jumaa or on tv whats goin to happen innthat countrey any thing could happen

[@mohdimran-iq8ik]

In our country we daily criticized our prime mi​

[@nurabdi3600]

When are you going to refute yourself ? That will be dope

[@muslimchat]

Walaa' with the rulers instead of with your fellow duaat. No matter how you spin it, that is inevitably what you've done. Also - this video was meant to show the middle path between the khawarij & "madkhalis", but you pretty much only focused on side.. some questions for you: 1) Are you trying to imply that only those with Khawarij ideology make takfir on those who rule by man-made systems or dismantle the shariah? 2) Is excessive tabdee' and removing people from the fold of ahlus sunnah by the "madkhalis" not a major problem that needs addressing? 3) Are you claiming that none of our 'ulama or duaat of Ahlus sunnah publicly named, shamed or mocked the rulers? And did you distance yourself from them and stop sharing their other works due to it?

[@yazan717]

Unsubscribed You started your Video by saying there are 2 types of extrems but you spent 30 seconds talking about one, and 14:30 Minutes talking about the other. I think you are more on the Madkhali side than you like to admit, which became more clear after your last Statement that you don’t want to be asossiated with Daniel and deleted his videos. Sorry for my Bad English

[@whitetrashtrucker908]

Daniels work is the most potent Dawah on YouT, even if ur not a muslim... his disection of Liberalism and exposoing the onslaught against traditional values is vital to ppl waking up to the reality of the situation

[@Muwahid999]

@@ZaynElAbideen can you give example (how women are oppressed according to his dawah)?

[@lotetree6140]

Him engaging in debate with a woman ( feminist and hijabi) says a lot about his understanding . Who does that ? It shows some or most of his actions are somehow questionable. Beside his manners are really provocative and triggering. His replying non muslims with comments like “ seethe lol “” says he somehow needs to upgrade his manner . Where Allah instructed Musa ( as) to use softer tone with pharaoh when dealing with him so that pharaoh may understand and comprehend. Him always issuing feminist are the culprit but forgetting that man are also the problem is painful to digest . Some of this feminism actually arisen from their husbands abuse and lack of take care from their fathers or seeing personal relatives suffering from close males.

[@AJ-il1lm8ph7z]

@@ZaynElAbideen Yet his wife and he graduated from harvard university, how ironic. Had he and his wife not had the education they were privileged to have they wouldn't be able to engage with anyone like the way do.

[@bowenaleron6842]

@@ZaynElAbideen you just make statements without explaining nothing

[@bowenaleron6842]

@@ZaynElAbideen no why is that relevant, i am just commenting on your comment under this post

[@khalidolaimi5335]

Talking of Muslim rulers. If a ruler lines himself with Israel, supports them and says we need to change and edit some things in our religion. Going against him is haram?

[@عبدالله-ن6ه2ص]

Rulers are not angels, we want them to stay, but to break the ruler for reasons For example, Erdogan says Israel is our friend and still supports secularism, and one of the largest Justice and Development Party says that we do not want to prevent the role of prostitution in Turkey on a live broadcast on an Arab channel. Do you support the overthrow of President Erdogan and his party because of what they say and because of their actions as well, as many Turkish companies deal with the Zionist entity?

[@khalidolaimi5335]

@@عبدالله-ن6ه2ص what erdogan did will forever be wrong. But it’s not the worst thing that happened. Other rulers like sisi and bin zayed literally sent forces to help zionists as well as they say we need to pick things in Islam and leave things.

[@zaki97safi]

What is the sunnah for advicing ruler?

[@theonepurpose3968]

watch this, exactly he's a neo-salafi kzbin.info/www/bejne/laqnl6GPo9uDnpI

[@razzims]

Any "muslim" ruler who allied to the zionist belong to the zionists. Al Maidah 51. Can we agree on that?

[@muhannadsameer2863]

Sadly I feel there are some weird indications here by brother Sajid which he himself says is wrong and then I feel he again indicates it in the video: 1 Criticism of Evil or standing against establishing evil or prohibition of govt established evils, like shirki festivals etc, Sajid equates it to instigation to rebellion against govt in the vid As if there is only two categories, either stay quite - ignore or Rebel and there's no third or 4th category at all? رأى عمارة بن رويبة بشر بن مروان وهو يدعو في يوم جمعة، فقال عمارة: قبح الله هاتين اليدين 2 Saajid says, yes as ahlul sunnah we do takfeer at times, but yet kind of indicates in the rest of his speech that merely making Takfeer is rhetoric of the Khwarij, contradicting the ahlul sunnah. وقال يحيى بن عيسى الرملي عن الأعمش اختلفوا في الحجاج فسألوا مجاهداً فقال تسألون عن الشيخ الكافر، وروى ابن عساكر عن الشعبي أنه قال: الحجاج مؤمن بالجبت والطاغوت كافر بالله العظيم كذا قال والله أعلم، 3 Sajid indicates prohibition of evil and forbidding evil of the govt leads to bloodshed etc, this is apparently a "lazim" and this isn't necessarily true. Some real khwarij minded ppl use similar "lawazim" and say "so and so's end path destination is be kufr as the system leads to it in the end so let's make takfeer from now itself" 4 Saajid completely ignores some of the acts that tantamount to disbelief (as stated by scholars, not merely sins) being promoted by these govts (like taking part in opening temples, taking pharaohs of our times as close allies while opening military bases for them and supporting these pharaohs in their wars on other Muslims etc). وقال أبو الحسن الأشعريُّ: (إرادة الكُفر كفرٌ، وبناء كنيسة يُكفَر فيها بالله كُفر؛ لأنَّه إرادة الكفر)( [20]). However, Just for who's reading in general, sometimes someone may fall into kufr and may not be judged as a kafir due to the obstacles of takfeer. 5 There are other acts which these govts do like making allowed what is agreed upon as haram and indicating it "moderate islam", raising statues where ppl can make a wish (for entertainment purposes) , allowing celebrating Halloween, allowing and establishing free mixing with music etc, in the country BY LAW, .. etc. And ignoring these and keep on mentioning abt takfeer due to mere SINS and not looking at the reality of some of the govts in deep manner on how they are disabled by their Western masters etc is a sad approach on reality! 6 Sajid Indicates that this rhetoric is made by a minor proportion of 'khwarij influenced' ' youth only, but if you see there are scholars who are much well versed and more deeper in knowledge than Sajid who have these views and criticise govt openly in many issues : Shaikh Ali alKhudair or Nasser alFahd or Shaikh Sulaiman Ulwan or Shaikh Tarefe, Dr. Hani sibai, Dr. tariq abdelhaleem, Shaikh Ahmad alKhaldi, Shaikh Ahmad Jibril, Shaikh Dedo alShinqitee, Shaikh Safar alHawali etc. Obviously many of the bolder scholars don't get platforms and are in jail so their knowledge of reality or ijtihadat or completely made to be hidden from the masses. I'm not saying all of these scholars have right stances, I'm just saying prohibiting public evil publicly or calling against establishing Haram as permissible in the country isn't just done by random bunch of khwarij minded youth. And if some scholars consider some acts as kufr and call out kufr as kufr it doesn't mean it is rebellious or that they are khwarij. In certain situations it is normal for scholars to disagree on ruling of a ruler, like what happened at the time of Hajjaj Bin Yusuf alThaqafi 7 I agree there are a lot of youth who are not grounded in these issues and may cause wrong takfeer and May not understand the political reality and difficulties some govts face, and may demand every sin to be removed from society with force, or else actually call for rebellion while we are in a weak state etc. But maybe rather than banishing them, maybe teach them how and to what extent is our responsibility in explaining the deen when these evils are apparent and how to prohibit the evil without causing a bigger evil, (not just ignore the elephant in the room, just so it isn't considered as '' inciting against govt'', like many pro Saudi preachers do, making it easy for the govts to keep establishing new falsehood more easily step by step)... and it is also important to teach when a govt is excused if it actually just ignores some evil due to slack or less eman and its' difference between making some evil as law and establishing it by the govt in the country. and jazakAllah khair, but maybe we can disagree on your stances on the way to approach the evils of these govt depending on your knowledge of their realities, it doesn't always have to be deviance and khwarij vs irja wallah a3lam .

[@DefendSyria]

👍

[@poeticnurmagedamov4802]

some interesting points raised

[@itqantraining2937]

JazakAllah khair

[@muhannadsameer2863]

@@itqantraining2937 wa iyk

[@tahamuhammed6607]

👌

[@northernrebel1402]

As much as I like listening to both Saajid and Daniel, I don't see where Daniel encouraged any form of rebellion against any Muslim ruler. Yes he criticized the Saudi government for hosting Halloween parties since it's a devil worshiping pagan festival but there is a difference between harmless criticism and rebellion. What Daniel did was harmless criticism.

[@MFariz07]

That is also what I do not understand from people who claim DH tends towards the khariji side. The biggest crime that he perhaps did was to label people as Madkhalis and bootlickers. Still, I don't see how merely that qualifies him to be a khawarij. Would love some clarification from people who disagree.

[@munis002]

So true it's just a mud slinging . He no where spoke about takfir only the wrong action like Halloween etc

[@northernrebel1402]

@@mohdsadiq.salafi Can you please share the video? Thanks in advance!

[@abdulazizredi3682]

if you see any tweets or any post most of the comments are we should fight the Saudi government and took Meka and Medina

[@northernrebel1402]

@@abdulazizredi3682 Has Daniel openly said anything like that? If so, where exactly did he say that?

[@_Abdussalama]

But is keeping silent when some leaders allow the celebration of idolatry acts like Halloween in the land of Islam the way to go? How should such be approached?

[@aaliyah3037]

Yes, you stay silent and focus on your family and friends. The Saudi scholars have warned against Halloween and other idolatrous festivals.

[@Revolt_west]

It is best to leave the criticism for the scholars in most cases but we definitely cannot criticize the rulers personally. That is a whole 'nother level! BarakAllahu Feek

[@_Abdussalama]

@@aaliyah3037 Share links to the lectures, please!

[@DefendSyria]

Recomment of another comment which I think got sidelined! " Sadly I feel there are some weird indications here by brother Sajid despite him himself initially saying that it isnt the case, yet it seems he indicates otherwise : 1 Criticism of Evil or standing against establishing evil or prohibition of govt established evils, like shirki festivals etc, Sajid equates it to instigation to rebellion against govt in the vid As if there is only two categories, either stay quite - ignore or Rebel and there's no third or 4th category at all? رأى عمارة بن رويبة بشر بن مروان وهو يدعو في يوم جمعة، فقال عمارة: قبح الله هاتين اليدين 2 Saajid says, yes as ahlul sunnah we do takfeer at times, but yet kind of indicates in the rest of his speech that merely making Takfeer is rhetoric of the Khwarij, contradicting the ahlul sunnah. وقال يحيى بن عيسى الرملي عن الأعمش اختلفوا في الحجاج فسألوا مجاهداً فقال تسألون عن الشيخ الكافر، وروى ابن عساكر عن الشعبي أنه قال: الحجاج مؤمن بالجبت والطاغوت كافر بالله العظيم كذا قال والله أعلم، 3 Sajid indicates prohibition of evil and forbidding evil of the govt leads to bloodshed etc, this is apparently a "lazim" and this isn't necessarily true. Some real khwarij minded ppl use similar "lawazim" and say "so and so's end path destination is be kufr as the system leads to it in the end so let's make takfeer from now itself" 4 Saajid completely ignores some of the acts that tantamount to disbelief (as stated by scholars, not merely sins) being promoted by these govts (like taking part in opening temples, taking pharaohs of our times as close allies while opening military bases for them and supporting these pharaohs in their wars on other Muslims etc). وقال أبو الحسن الأشعريُّ: (إرادة الكُفر كفرٌ، وبناء كنيسة يُكفَر فيها بالله كُفر؛ لأنَّه إرادة الكفر)( [20]). However, Just for who's reading in general, sometimes someone may fall into kufr and may not be judged as a kafir due to the obstacles of takfeer. 5 There are other acts which these govts do like making allowed what is agreed upon as haram and indicating it "moderate islam", raising statues where ppl can make a wish (for entertainment purposes) , allowing celebrating Halloween, allowing and establishing free mixing with music etc, in the country BY LAW, .. etc. And ignoring these and keep on mentioning abt takfeer due to mere SINS and not looking at the reality of some of the govts in deep manner on how they are disabled by their Western masters etc is a sad approach on reality! 6 Sajid Indicates that this rhetoric is made by a minor proportion of 'khwarij influenced' ' youth only, but if you see there are scholars who are much well versed and more deeper in knowledge than Sajid who have these views and criticise govt openly in many issues : Shaikh Ali alKhudair or Nasser alFahd or Shaikh Sulaiman Ulwan or Shaikh Tarefe, Dr. Hani sibai, Dr. tariq abdelhaleem, Shaikh Ahmad alKhaldi, Shaikh Ahmad Jibril, Shaikh Dedo alShinqitee, Shaikh Safar alHawali etc. Obviously many of the bolder scholars don't get platforms and are in jail so their knowledge of reality or ijtihadat or completely made to be hidden from the masses. I'm not saying all of these scholars have right stances, I'm just saying prohibiting public evil publicly or calling against establishing Haram as permissible in the country isn't just done by random bunch of khwarij minded youth. And if some scholars consider some acts as kufr and call out kufr as kufr it doesn't mean it is rebellious or that they are khwarij. In certain situations it is normal for scholars to disagree on ruling of a ruler, like what happened at the time of Hajjaj Bin Yusuf alThaqafi 7 I agree there are a lot of youth who are not grounded in these issues and may cause wrong takfeer and May not understand the political reality and difficulties some govts face, and may demand every sin to be removed from society with force, or else actually call for rebellion while we are in a weak state etc. But maybe rather than banishing them, maybe teach them how and to what extent is our responsibility in explaining the deen when these evils are apparent and how to prohibit the evil without causing a bigger evil, (not just ignore the elephant in the room, just so it isn't considered as '' inciting against govt'', like many pro Saudi preachers do, making it easy for the govts to keep establishing new falsehood more easily step by step)... and it is also important to teach when a govt is excused if it actually just ignores some evil due to slack or less eman and its' difference between making some evil as law and establishing it by the govt in the country. and jazakAllah khair, but maybe we can disagree on your stances on the way to approach the evils of these govt depending on your knowledge of their realities, it doesn't always have to be deviance and khwarij vs irja wallah a3lam

[@abdulqadirhaj2995]

👌

[@findyourpurpose6792]

I agree with everything you say on your channel but I STRONGLY DISAGREE with this one if this is about brother Daniel's video on Sau-D government promoting Halloween. Should we just keep quiet and let them promote paganistic celebrations and let our religion be diluted? Remember back when they started celebrating our Prophet(saw)'s birthday in Egypt rule and no one said anything? Now almost half the religion celebrates 12th Rabialawwal and indulge in bida' which would most definitely hurt their Hereafter. Do you think Umar(ra) would stay silent if Abu Bakr(ra) started celebrating our Prophet (saw)'s birthday? At that time, khilafas could be overthrown via battle. Now these people who govern Sau-D cannot be overthrown and will remain in power as long as they want and slowly but surely dilute the Deen to a point where introducing laws like "no prayers on sidewalks" will become easy. Who will want to pray when you can dress as a zombie and dance all night or go watch John Cena act in Jeddah? Should we just stand back and watch as our religion disintegrates just for the fear of being called a "khawarij"? I would recommend you politely to consider your stance on this matter.

[@wth1982]

I completely agree, I thought it was just me thinking "how on earth does DH criticizing the Saudi leadership for allowing Halloween celebration equate to him being a khariji?" like this seems like an extreme overreaction from brother Saajid, almost as if he's being pressured to respond by those who disagree with DH on other matters too

[@findyourpurpose6792]

I don't know if it's his loyalty to his Medinah Institute or something else but like brother Saajid himself has said multiple times, "Our loyalty is only to Allah". I hope he realises this and patches up with Daniel.

[@Someone-vz2bo]

@@wth1982 Saajid never called DH a khariji. He explicitly mentioned it in the video. He’s calling DH out on unjustly labelling people as “bootlickers” and “madkhalis”.

[@wth1982]

@@Someone-vz2bo I agree and stated that in another comment. He says he is not calling him a Khariji but the whole video was about the Khawarij and how we should avoid being like them, not rebelling against rulers, not making takfir on them etc (none of which DH ever did). Then a one liner about how he isn't calling him a Khariji, but he is still dissociating from him? Why? Because he criticised Saudi rulers for not clamping down on a Halloween celebration? It's disingenuous or confusing at the very least

[@muslim_kun]

Jazaka Allah khair akhi but Daniel didn't make takfir on a muslim ruler he pointed out that Halloween is haram and criticize saudi government for pushing it, and I'm from 🇸🇦 and i testify what Daniel said was true, then a punch of saudi ppl came to him and said to him u r from khawarij, then Daniel said these guys are madkhalis which is obsoletely true, Halloween shouldn't be celebrated in muslims land it's a shirk festival and if the government is pushing it we have to enjoy goood and forbid evil, and that's exactly what Daniel did

[@mohammedahmed1109]

يا اخي بارك الله فيك الإنكار العلني على الحكام المسلمين شرعاً لا يجوز الا في حالات معينة مثلاً ان تكون عنده و ان تؤمن الفتنة ، لكن انك تنكر عليه في المنابر و وسائل الإعلام فهذا حرام ، و اما قولك هؤلاء مداخلة لانهم ينكرون على أمثال دانيال هذا ، فهذا ظلم منك

[@muslim_kun]

@@mohammedahmed1109 بارك الله فيك وانا اتفق معك ان الانكار على الحكام يكون خاصا في اغلب الحالات لكن اللذي يجعل الناس تنكر علنا هو لان الدولة تريد الاحتفال بهذا الاحتفال الشركي واساسه شرك في الله تعالى لكي يعرف العامة هذا الامر وكل من انكر في بلاد الحرمين الشريفين ذهبوا الى السجن فلم يبقى الا هذا ليس هناك خيار اخر لان من يكتم علما سوف يلجم بلجام من النار يوم الحساب واذا سكتنا سيظن اهل الباطل انهم على حق، الأمر بالمعروف والنهي عن المنكر واجب، واعظم الجهاد هو كلمة حق عند سلطان جائر هذا حديث الرسول محمد صلى الله عليه وسلم والله اعلم

[@mohammedahmed1109]

@@muslim_kun اخي بارك الله فيك ، العلماء يحذرون من هذه الأمور و لله الحمد لم يسجنوا ، اغلب الذين سجنوا هم من الاخوان المسلمين و السروريين الذين لا يحذرون من المنكرات فقط بل يعرضون بالحكام، و يا أخي حذر من الشرك ، حذر من المنكرات و صدقني لن يعترض عليك أحد لكن حذاري ان تكون سبباً في التفريق بين جماعة المسلمين

[@muslim_kun]

@@mohammedahmed1109 والله اني احس الكلام طالع من قلبك اخوي جزاك الله خير لكن من كثر السكوت عن السلطان اصبحت الامرات تفتع معابد هند سية واخاف من كثرة السكوت يعبد اللات والعزى عندنا وهذا حديث عن رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم 0 - أنَّ النبيَّ صلَّى اللهُ عليهِ وسلَّمَ سئل أيُّ الجهادِ أفضلُ قال كلمةُ حقٍّ عند سلطانٍ جائرٍ الراوي : طارق بن شهاب | المحدث : أبو حاتم الرازي | المصدر : المراسيل ابن أبي حاتم | الصفحة أو الرقم : 98 | خلاصة حكم المحدث : مرسل

[@mohammedahmed1109]

@@muslim_kun أخي بارك الله فيك ، إقرأ تفسير العلماء للحديث الذي ذكرت، فالرسول صلى الله عليه وسلم قال " كلمة حق عند سلطان جائر " ، عند ولم يقل من وراء ولا في المنابر ، انما تكون عنده و المنكر بارك الله فيك لا يغير بالمنكر ، فالبلايا التي تحصل لا بمعصية الله و رسوله و إنما بالطرق الشرعية

[@zakarie]

Allah knows who is right but my gut feelings tells as soon as Daniel criticized KSA for the Halloween 🎃then all of sudden he is labelled kawaarij, what am I missing here ?

[@taimurahmad]

This is a way older problen than halloweev. Watch onewaytoparadise on daniel and you will know(this vid is way older)

[@peacefulbrother]

This about manhaj and aqidah. Many don't follow the salaf as-salih so they are quick to make takfir upon rulers and sadly end up becoming extreme like the khawarij

[@ozone2126]

Ur missing Quran and sunnah

[@abdelaawol941]

​@@peacefulbrother say madkhali they don't even have slight connection to salaf they are bootlickers and agents of the west through ksa and uae

[@thariqafendi506]

What would you say about the children who lay dead in Yemen by the hands of the saudi rulers..

[@stradegy3338]

Is the rule in Saudi a rule established like how Abu Bakr and Umar RA established Khilafah? What about the ottomans?

[@berznji3000]

Daniel is great Muslim speaker. He is bold and super intelligent, and loyal. Please, the hell with our broken leader who don’t care about you and your family. They care about so called queen than their own people.

[@abulkhidr]

Since when did justifiable criticism (nahyi anil munkar) become “rebellion” or “making takfir”?! Sorry but I thought Br. Saajid was better than the rather loose connections/assumptions he’s making here.

[@imjustvisiting5397]

Daniel Haqiqatjou is NOT INCITING REBELLION. HE ONLY CRITICIZED THE SAUDI GOVERNMENT FOR ENDORSING KUFRIYYA SHAYTANI CELEBRATIONS. HE NEVER SAID ANYTHING ABOUT PEOPLE REVOLTING. ALSO, HE STUDIED ISLAM WITH RESPECTED TRADITIONAL SCHOLARS. JUST BECAUSE HE DIDN'T GO TO MADINA UNIVERSITY DOESN'T MEAN HE DOESN'T KNOW ABOUT THE RELIGION.

[@MuhammadAli-mz4pq]

That is a trait of the Waidiyyah, a form of Khawarij.

[@MuhammadAli-mz4pq]

Those traditional scholars, are Daesh promoters.

[@Someone-vz2bo]

What “traditional scholars” exactly? Please name them.

[@timepaas6647]

Brother Sajid you could have easily approached Daniel, talked on these issues and that would have been more mature unlike such dramatic videos. Clearly promoting unislamic pagan rituals need to be criticised. When a muslim ruler hinders islam and the aqeedah, promotes westernisation of the muslim world, he atleast need to be criticised with the tongue, so that people don't follow the king blindly. The way they did wearing those costumes and makeups on the command of the king.

[@imranqqq7307]

Hold on a second. From what I've seen, the only thing Daniel has placed online is criticism of the Saudi government for sponsoring Saudi Halloween. Is this a problem, or unIslamic? Of course anyone is free to distance themselves from anyone, but I don't understand why are you criticizing him? He never called Saudi rulers kuffar (a red herring issue here), nor did he even encourage disobedience to these rulers. So what exactly is the problem with Daniel? Is it that he criticized the Saudi government for encouraging secularism and demonic festivals? But isn't that exactly what a righteous Muslim should do to a ruler that is leading his people astray?

[@not_hAck3r]

Yes. Brother Daniel is in the right path

[@abdullahjaber7621]

He’s not talking about that Halloween video.

[@theoldrsftw]

the goverment sponsored it? what is your proof?

[@aaliyah3037]

Every action has consequences. Public criticism creates animosity towards the Muslim rulers which then can lead to rebellion.

[@gray8091]

@@aaliyah3037 Its ok if the said rulers distort shariah(allowing music,freemixing in the said music concerts,allowing pagan festivals) since they arent Muslims

[@savage1343]

I don't get it. Has Saajid distanced himself because Daniel made a video pointing out Saudi trying to secularise the people and allowing pagan practices like halloween ? If that's the reason for the distancing, then Daniel hasn't lost anything.

[@qmr0n]

No

[@howtowithassitan9752]

yes

[@ABCDEF-os5or]

I don't see what's wrong with what Daniel said about Halloween Saudi Arabia? He was absolutely right. He did not declare war against the rulers so how can you say what you said about hom? I'm very sad to see the state of ummah today. If one person says something which is absolutely right then the other would just disown him like you did. Brother I think you should give it a second thought. Instead of distancing from Daniel, reach out to him and share your perspective. Your stance is unnecessarily harsh. The rulings you mentioned do not apply to him. I see him as a sincere Muslim who's only trying to guide the ummah, the ummah that seems to be drowning right now and your stance does not help in saving the ummah.

[@ABCDEF-os5or]

@le rayon vert He does not disapprove of women's education. He disapproves the co-education of men and women and he disapprove of what is being taught to the women, ie. feminism which is actually destroying women.

[@luluah1198]

@le rayon vert not sure how he disapproves of women’s education I thought his own wife went to university ?

[@yourservice743]

Critizing is not revealing

[@joynalmiah8864]

Rebellions is not something I want but We can’t criticise rulers? I guess Pagans holidays like Halloween will be the norm in Saudi Arabia

[@philipscorn9006]

Daniel didn't make any takfir. He condemn all sorts of violence against the rulers. The so-called "harmless criticism" is haram according to the hadiths so please stop using emotional appeal. Actually, it's not harmless because you are inciting violence (even though he condemns it) just as the liberals are inciting freedom when they unwantedly (like Daniel) incite the destruction of society.

[@q8kikpsnhotmailcom]

you advise them privately like the prophet ordered us to do ‘Iyad ibn Ghanam reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Whoever intends to advise one with authority on a matter, he should not do so publicly. Rather, he should take him by the hand and advise him in private. If he accepts the advice, all is well. If he does not accept it, he has fulfilled his duty.” Source: Musnad Aḥmad 14909 Grade: Sahih (authentic) according to Al-Albani

[@wth1982]

Is it just me that fails to see how any of the criticisms brother Saajid highlighted apply to Daniel? DH never called for insurrection/khurooj or any sort of rebellion against any Muslim rulers. He never declared them to be kafir either? I know brother Saajid at the end put in a disclaimer saying he isn't calling DH a khariji, but then why disassociate from him? And also why spend majority of the video lambasting the Khawarij and then claim the right approach is to take the middle-path? It is the right approach, but this video has scant criticism of those who don't hold Muslim leaders accountable for ruling contrary to Shari'a. I don't know, it just seems there is much more that needs to be said on this topic, and this video barely scratches the surface.

[@aimeneabderraoufmahdi2261]

@@anonymousnoticer Such a perpetual liar.

[@messageoftawheed7828]

I have a question: isn't comepletely legislating by other than what Allah revealed kufr?

[@yagamilolo8986]

That's kufr without any doubt ... and not "kufr douna kufr". And the fitna in the quran is : Shirk so we re amoug alot in fitna even if it's not war. Democracy, atheism, zandaqua, Tahakum to taghut, Ignorance of deen ... ect ect This is Fitna.

[@Revolt_west]

Not necessarily, in all times. It can get tricky. I will refer you to an 11 hour podcast Ustadh Abdulrahman Hassan has on this very topic of "Khurooj". He is FAR wiser than I. BarakAllahu Feek

[@ummrawamus]

saajid is absolutely wrong about daniel .. watch daniel's response to saajid. all doubts cleared alhamdulillaah

[@yehenala1]

Which Muslim countries is impermanenting 99% of the shariah?? I want to know

[@yehenala1]

Also forget 99%, even if a person knowing make istihalal or change just one law of Allah from one thousand this is still Kufr Akbr. Did this guy pay attention at Madinah university? What did he study?

[@ayaanayub9166]

I've got to agree with Daniel I mean he just always makes sense to me

[@ExaoSS]

Was Aisha and Talha radya Allah A'nohm khawarij in the Battle of the Camel when they didn't agree with Ali radya Allah A'nah. What about other narrations that clearly doesn't prevent Amr bel ma'rof like this narration "Tāriq ibn Shihāb al-Bajali al-Ahmasi (may Allah be pleased with him) reported that a man, who was set for travel, asked the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him): ''Which type of Jihad is better?'' He replied: "A word of truth said to a despotic ruler." " How do you reconcile between these contradictions. I honestly think you were programmed in KSA to follow their way of understanding Islam. May Allah guid us all.

[@md.shahadathossain8880]

he's trying to defend the gulf monarchies..... When daniel is talking about why we need a caliph....

[@q8kikpsnhotmailcom]

Aisha and talha are not infallible brother nor is ali for that matter. are you putting the hadith of the the prophet second to the deeds of the sahaba? are you serious? "A word of truth said to a despotic ruler" true. and you must do it in private for the rulers especially because the prophet also said: ‘Iyad ibn Ghanam reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Whoever intends to advise one with authority on a matter, he should not do so publicly. Rather, he should take him by the hand and advise him in private. If he accepts the advice, all is well. If he does not accept it, he has fulfilled his duty.” Source: Musnad Aḥmad 14909 Grade: Sahih (authentic) according to Al-Albani now stop spreading misguidance please barak allahu feek.

[@ExaoSS]

@@q8kikpsnhotmailcom nope headeth comes first, but my example was dor a reason. who do you think have a better understanding of hadeeth and Quran, them or us? You think Aisha radya Allah anha would go against a hadeeth? do you think. You bring weak hadeeth to prove you weak point?! co'mon akhey you stop misleading may Allah guide us

[@q8kikpsnhotmailcom]

@@ExaoSS It is known that sahaba were regretful about what happened during the fitna of the killing of uthman. Al thahabi said that the athar mentions that for example aisha was very regretful about the Jamal in particular. As an example. Also the very same sahaba made baia to a trangressing ruler after all in yazeed bin muawiya didn't they ? So refer back to the sahih ahadith one of which you ignored from my reply.

[@ExaoSS]

@@q8kikpsnhotmailcom you still missing the point and conflting things.. hopefully because of naivety.. none in the statement you mentioned anything about الامر بالمعروف being haram or wrong towards a ruler. you just want to give rulers absolutely immunity that even sahab didn't grant themselves. The hadeeth you mentioned is weak, go check it out, and stop making weak hadeaths sahih because they fit your narrative.

[@ArabiansFTW]

unsubscribed

[@darkcloud9053]

I just want to ask a simple thing. It is ok to rebel against rulers that are against Saudi government ? Then why did the so called scholars support Iraq, Afghanistan and even Yemen war. If inciting rebellion is haram then they should be called out as well. Second why does Saudi scholars criticise other Muslim rulers? Famous example is Egypt Muhammad morsi. Now that country is ruled by sisi fattah, no one says anything bad at all.

[@MohamedAli-ko8gc]

Proof please.

[@fahadhusain1985]

Learn Islam first

[@darkcloud9053]

@@MohamedAli-ko8gc proof what? How old are you? During iraq war saudi allowed USA to use their ground for air strikes. There were major protest against it. Then the protesters were called kwarij. Only after Saddam's death and Iran's uprising in iraq, saudi started to lobby against the iraq war.

[@darkcloud9053]

@@fahadhusain1985 learn what ? It is ok to incite rebellion against Muhammad morsi but now that sisi is in power why aren't the same scholars saying anything? Looks like double standard to me.

[@mohammed9w553]

@@darkcloud9053 Saudi and arabs states in general are under zionist influence , they aren't free , Sadam was and that's the reason for the invasion of Iraq. What's sad is that some muslims defend them thinking their leaders are free , they are just mere slaves of America.

[@layman9231]

Yes the methodology of ahlusunnah is to obey a Muslim leader in what is good and being patient on their deviances unless they become apostates. But those rulers who: 1. Are secularists 2. Are communists 3. Are neo-lebralists 4. Make lawful what is clearly Haram in Islam. 5. Join anti- Islam coalitions. 6. Try to distort Islam by introducing clear cut kufr practices and ideas. 7. Abolish Sharia and institute other legal systems in place of Sharia. 8. Ally with enemies of Islam against Muslims. Are apostates As for overthrowing them, it depends on the capacity of Muslims to do so without falling into greater mischief.

[@dominiquevillaroel4930]

I'm confused! What did DH said that made Sajid think that he was inciting rebellion against Saudi leaders? Many ppl made videos about Halloween being celebrated in Saudi

[@AArrad]

I don’t think it’s only that. If you just listen to the way DH talks, he always calls the Muslim nations as “not truly Muslim or Muslim led”, inferring that it’s become a state run by Kafirs.

[@derekosgood3230]

@Arrad Well when Nikki Minaj was invited to do a show there not long ago...lol I mean what else is there to think?

[@AArrad]

@@derekosgood3230 You would make takfir on someone for listening to music? Ya akhi, even if someone murdered 100 people and prayed, you still cannot make takfir on him.

[@derekosgood3230]

@Arrad it's not about music lol it's about her. I personally don't care. I don't live there anyway. They can do whatever they want. As far as murdering 100 people I'm not really trying to hear that.

[@sproutkraft6690]

You’re position on the matter discussed is not clear Saajid unless you share your views on the Muslim rulers allowing pagan traditions such as Halloween? Also separate question to the above, if a Muslim ruler allows/promotes pagan traditions does that constitute to shirk?

[@Faylasoofe-kaa]

Brother Saajid I respect you deeply and I love you for the sake of Allah, but I have to disagree with you regarding our brother Daniel Haqiqatjou. Someone needs to call out those devils whom tries to spread fitnah amongst our muslim community, even if they are labelling themselves as "muslims", pray and fast as muslims. Their are many simple muslims who fall into their trap. DH has my outmost respect for shedding a light upon those clearly deviants. Finally may Allah help and guide us all in these hardships and tribulations.

[@heromys9463]

Calling out those 'devils' like those simp imams within the community who spread degeneracy, then yes. But not related to calling out the leaders of the Muslim countries, because this goes directly against the order of the prophet who told us to obey them, even if their hearts are like those of devils, as long as we do not obey them in Haram of course. Moreover the prophet told us that if wr see something of our leader that we hate, we should take him by the hand and advise him in private. It is not about what I want or see proper, or what you want or see proper, but it is about what tbe prophet ordered us.

[@maazmustafa2322]

Didn't you have a look at that first hadith which Sajid showed? If so, then act upon it

[@philipscorn9006]

Daniel didn't make any takfir. He condemn all sorts of violence against the rulers. The so-called "harmless criticism" is haram according to the hadiths so please stop using emotional appeal. Actually, it's not harmless because you are inciting violence (even though he condemn it) just as the liberals are inciting freedom when they unwantedly (like Daniel) incite the destruction of society.

[@oubaiti9240]

All you’re doing Sajid is pointing fingers to our dawa brothers 😢

[@derekosgood3230]

@Ismail AH Yeah well Daniel feels he's doing the same thing.

[@TheAnonYmouse]

And if I'm not mistaken (correct me if I'm wrong) didn't the Saudis not submit to the Ottoman khalifa and fight against them? Were they not being aided by the kuffar too? Why did they not submit to the authority of the khalifa? And I know they had corruption, but we are to obey the Muslim rulers.

[@TheAnonYmouse]

@Tawheed Promoter Sources please.

[@osmankeskin9140]

@Tawheed Promoter if this was true it would have no difference to what saudi kingdom is doing. Arent they legalizing what allah declared haram.

[@nazirahmad6335]

Lol a real Madina graduate who supports the KSA regime

[@bashirgoon7102]

I Love both Daniel and your work. Daniel may not have Islamic study like you but he called out bravely enough all the Qoum lut imam and Sunnah frame work.

[@mohammadtaha7973]

Both you and him have been a great source of knowledge for me so I really hope that Allah swt guides Daniel and both you and him can be united upon haqq.

[@fark69]

I don't see why he needs to stop promoting Daniel. The spectre of liberalism is huge and the people speaking against it are few. These two agree about everything, but Daniel thinks it's okay to criticize the ruler of Saudi Arabia (who is not his own ruler) for approving shirk and Saajid does not. Both of them believe Halloween celebrating to be shirk, both believe liberalism to be wrong for the world, both believe abundantly in the Quran and Sunnah, but over this little issue (imo not an issue at all) they will separate. Very sad

[@Sarah.G_2]

@@fark69 Is this the reason Saajid distanced himself from Daniel? Over the Halloween video? Or is there more?

[@Hamabeach]

@@Sarah.G_2 Daniel seems to attack any Muslim scholar for any view they have that he doesn't like.

[@retardadem4459]

@@Hamabeach he speaks against liberalism so if this "scholars" u talking about are liberals then he is right

[@ChErRyaVe20pK]

@@Hamabeach if you are referring to those from yaqeen institute. Then i would agree that they are not scholars

[@abdullahjaber7621]

Both of you are right. You need to talk this out. Deleting all your videos and disassociating from Daniel was overkill.

[@ummrawamus]

saajid is wrong in this matter .. watch daniel's response to saajid. all doubts cleared alhamdulillaah

[@NM-lh6tf]

What about enjoining right and forbidding evil? I haven't seen a single video where Daniel says to rebel against Muslim rulers. Stating that a Muslim is doing an act of kufr is not the same as labeling him a kafir. Unfortunately, the Ummah is in such chaos that we have a good brother throwing the labels of khawarij to another good brother when criticizing a Muslim ruler. Look at the lives of all the great imams (Abu Haneefa, Ibn Taymiyah etc) they were thrown in prison and tortured bc they criticized the rulers of their times. I believe this brother is being too harsh to brother Daniel and Allah knows best.

[@deendrifts]

Tired of Muslim personalities busying themselves with refuting Muslims whilst letting Secularism and Liberalism run rife.

[@Tariqve]

It's only when the matter is important. This topic is an important matter of aqeedah, and it needs to be discussed.

[@deendrifts]

@@Tariqve I think the word aqeedah is used to amplify something to importance. The definition of aqeedah has been discussed throughout history amongst the scholars and fundamentally it is established based on matters that are Qat’i in the deen. Here we have ahadith being misapplied regarding present day rulers and a khalifah. The rules that applies to obeying those in authority refers to the Aamir Al mu’mineen whereas the Saudi funded scholars been redirecting it to blind obedience to them. Even the Aamir of the Muslims is conditional on there being no flagrant, open kufr which we do see in Muslim lands. I think the Khawarij are detrimental. But that again applies to those who do khurooj to the khalifah, not the present day puppet rulers

[@Someone-vz2bo]

Sheikh Bin Baz said: “If the people of truth did not speak out in clarification of the truth, then the people of error would remain upon their mistakes, others would blindly follow them in that, and the sin of withholding the truth would fall back on those who remained silent.” [Fatawa Bin Baz, (3/72)]

[@deendrifts]

@@Someone-vz2bo yes agreed. Enjoin in the hood and forbid the evil. But just sad when it’s selective, very selective.

[@farleymarly2575]

Man this is why I left this sect many years ago. This was the issue where this sect is blind. DH is right in the end times there will be scholars that will lead you astray and your going that same route.

[@MANAL83]

Ironic that you think it's Saajid that will lead you astray. My advice is to study the religio for yourself and stop taking all of your info from youtube daees

[@farleymarly2575]

@@MANAL83 yep agreed and same for you, stop listening to KZbin daees and protecting them

[@dr.nahlafarag4702]

Brother Sajid, with all due respect, aside from Daniel Haqiqatju and your stance on him, where in the world do you find a Muslim country with a true "Muslim" ruler?! Most of the Muslim countries are suffering from corruption, economic failures and oppression against Muslims and Islam itself!! What's your stance then on what's been happening in Syria, or Egypt, or Tunisia or Libya, and even Saudi Arabia, .... and the list goes on; because Muslims in these countries are literally crushed under the tyranny of a bunch cruel oppressive slaughterers, will you still tell them to have patience and obey their rulers?!

[@gymlover6514]

All these countries are examples on why u dont rebel against rulers... look Syria, 10 years of slaughter, and now bashar Assad is back in business as usual. No country got shariah from the arabic spring.

[@chickensoup9869]

@Mariam Khan Yes. Too many are quick to equate verbalizing criticism to rebellion.

[@أبوشغل]

If they want to obey Allah and His Messenger then they should do so. Al-Hajjaj was killing Muslims but Anas bin Malik still told the people to remain patient. Narrated Az-Zubair bin `Adi: We went to Anas bin Malik and complained about the wrong we were suffering at the hand of Al- Hajjaj. Anas bin Malik said, "Be patient till you meet your Lord, for no time will come upon you but the time following it will be worse than it. I heard that from the Prophet." Narrated by Al Bukhari

[@MohammedAlSharif2002]

Ibn Abī ‘Āsim reported in As-Sunnah (2/508) from ‘Adiyy Ibn Hātim (may Allah be pleased with him) that we said: “O Messenger of Allah, we do not ask you regarding obedience to the ruler who has taqwā (who is pious and who fears Allah), and is good and rectifies. Rather, we are asking about the ruler who does such-and-such and such-and-such?“ And he mentioned their evil traits. So the Prophet (ﷺ) answered: “Fear Allah! Listen to the ruler and obey him.” (Also reported by At-Tabarāni in Al-Kabīr, 17/101, and authenticated by Al-Albāni in Dhilāl Al-Jannah)

[@dr.nahlafarag4702]

@@gymlover6514 Brother, have you ever tried to go through this experience? Living in one of those Muslim countries? I mean of course not as a foreigner, but as an ordinary citizen who has no support by any means from the people in power or the ruling system? to feel unsafe all the time, to experience the horror of confiscating you assets, of being robbed by the ruling government or imprisoned or killed by the brutal regime? I guess not. much easier said than done!

[@alq6177]

I think that a student of knowledge needs more humility and mercy towards his brothers. Imam Al-Albani was walking around and sitting with the Brotherhood as if he were one of them - as he said - and God guided some of them by his hands and brought them back to the straight path of truth. Brother Daniel’s approach, as is well known, is a thousand times better than the Brotherhood’s approach.. so brother Sajid, be more humble! .

[@sabbirhasan7473]

Brother, I will agree 100% with you, if you remain true to your words. What is your opinion about Mohammad ibn saud who took money from the Britisher to revolt against the Muslim ruler of Makkah? It is well documented they made takfir of everyone. After capturing Makkah, they forced the scholars of Makkah to taka shahadah again.

[@muhammadjamessutton]

Muhammad ibn Saud was alive in the 1700s. In fact, he died 1765. What are you talking about? You do not even have your facts in order.

[@m6000000]

Alhamdulillah.. I was waiting for that. May Allah bless you brother Sajjad. Plz try to reach to him in private and discuss because i can see that he is a sincere guy and i think he will not refuse Haq. May Allah bless you. People don't understand how difficult what u have just explained.

[@marxistsabusegermansatn-bu38]

I arree, he seems to have some sincerity at face value. May Allah guide us and him!

[@AfghanPrince86]

I think daniel is in much straight path. You are being much softy.

[@badbritish2061]

Bro sajiid define madkaali….

[@solid.standpoint]

I don’t see how Daniel is against the sunnah.

[@hansolosh7700]

May Allah Subḥānahu wa-taʿālā guide brother Danial he loves Allah and his messenger I hope he can take from the loving advice

[@911amossadvanbomberplotaip9]

Daniel has done work against liberals, but Islam is the middle path and he sadly has errored on the opposite extreme of imams to be fair! View : *Daniel Haqiqatjou Refuted* - by Firqat Najiyah view : *Sulayman Al Ulwan Refuted Strongly* - by : Abu Shaybah Al Muhammadi Al Ulwan : "If he judges by other then Allah's law even while saying Allah's law is better, he is a polytheist" - Refuted by Tafsir ibn Abbas Quran 5 :44 by Ibn Kathir! Dan worked with Saifudin who calls to Al Ulwan, he should denounce and not work with him.

[@trndsttr7585]

While I respect your opinion, openly calling out imams who promote homosexuality and thinly-veiled shirk while ensconcing themselves in the filth-filled liberal status quo is not something I would discourage. The same goes for corrupt rulers.

[@yusufSArabia]

انا ما اعرف ناس يقولو عن المداخلة مداخلة لأنهم فقط يطبلون للحكام بل اول شيء بسبب هجومهم على العلماء وتبديعهم مش عشان الحكام ثانيا تطبيلهم للحكام بأشياء ما تجوز وتجويزها لهم كالحفلات المحرمة وأشياء كثيرة اما اختصاركم ان قول مداخلة معناها فقط من يطبل للحكام فهذا خطأ وغير صحيح

[@tareqallan]

JazakAllahukhairan brother, a reminder to the viewers who obsess over some of these topics and neglect basic fiqh like how to pay zakat or perform proper Tahara, just remember that's what you will be asked about before you are (if you are) asked about your stance on Muslim leaders while living in a western country.

[@Ibn_Abdulaziz]

Daniel Haqiqitou doesn't know the traps of the Madkhalis. He has gheera for Islam, and many young brothers with similar love for Islam may state things that will be used as soundbites until it harms their public image. They want victory for Islam but may end up with khawarij types of people due to anger and impatience and that is a trial. The madkhalis attach themselves to Salafis, thereby shielding themselves from missiles when people attack them, because the people firing missiles at them might missfire and instead of hitting the madkhali target, they hit the Salafiyyah wall behind instead. That's what Daniel fell into. Therefore you have to be very knowledgeable of the Usool and 'Aqidah of the Salafis in order to deal with the madkhalis. Some of them are knowledgeable hypocrites. Those outside Salafiyyah will be defeated by the madkhalis. So the ones to expose the madkhalis has to be the moderate Salafis who understand their traps. Instead of attacking a ruler, because this is not our position, nor is it helpful for Islam to displace Muslims until they beg disbelievers to let them into their countries. Instead of doing that, the way you deal with madkhalis is to ask them why the rulers they give allegiance to are building hedonistic cities for disbelievers, lgbt etc but not a Hijrah place for them? Why isn't Rabee' Al-Madkhali telling them to make Hijrah to him? Those are the ways I use. And they can't answer them. Then I tell them, would you give allegiance to a Sunni Muslim ruler for the Sunni Muslims of the west once we reach an ijma' (consensus) by the believers living in the west? If he says no, then he's the khaariji. That's an easier way to deal with the madkhalis. But contradicting a Saheeh Hadith from the Prophet ﷺ, then you're finished. And that's what young brothers who want victory for Islam but seek it through other paths, should becareful of. One disobedience is at it took for the calamity at Uhud. Imagine the calamity that would ensue from rebellion and revolutions. We are not anarchists or communists. But should have Sabr, and go through legal ways, that would make Muslim rulers even help you.

[@Ibn_Abdulaziz]

_Eemaan vs 'Irja vs Nifaq vs Kufr_ _1. Eemaan (Faith) according to Islam is:_ (a) Belief in the heart, (b) utterance of the tongue and (c) actions of the limbs. For example, (a) you believe in Allah ﷻ and the Last Day _in your heart,_ (b) then you bore testimony of that _with your tongue_ i.e. the Shahada (testimony of Faith), (c) and then you implemented that belief on _the limbs_ like Praying 5 times a Day, fasting during Ramadan and paying Zakat until the light of Eemaan increased in your heart and you rejoiced. And then let's say you sinned, and felt that the light of Eemaan diminished. That's because the light of Eemaan increases with good deeds and obedience to Allah ﷻ and decreases with sins and disobedience. Repentance to Allah ﷻ is like polishing the dark stains, and doing good deeds, are like watering and planting the tree of Eemaan. Therefore one could conclude that if someone is doing sins with his limbs or utters foul things from his mouth, then that eminates from what the heart contains. So if you want to see what a person has in his heart, then the speech of the tongue and actions of the limbs will testify to what his heart contains. The early Muslims did not accept the testimony of those who committed sins in public. Nor were their Hadith accepted as it had an impact on their 'Adalah (integrity). One of the reason a Hadith is Da'eef (weak) is due to no 'Adalah (integrity) from the narrator. Whereas a Hadith with a person who has an upright 'Adalah, but a weak memory or didn't write it down properly, is called Munkar (rejected). Therefore the most upright Muslims with good 'Adalah (integrity) and Dhabt (accuracy, memory), are the Rijaal (narrators) of Al-Bukhari and Muslim رحمهما الله. Allah ﷻ protected His religion with the Isnad (chain) and the trustworthy narrators. _2. The Murji'ah who commit 'irja say that Eemaan is:_ (a) Belief in _the heart,_ (b) utterance of _the tongue,_ but no actions of the limbs are required. This justifies sins. Because it renders those who are doing good deeds with their limbs equal in Faith with the sinners. Rendering doing good and sinning equal. Christians are the greatest of the Murji'ah. They will tell people that only belief and testifying that Jesus عليه السلام is god will grant salvation. And that your actions won't mean anything as long as you take Jesus عليه السلام as your lord and saviour. They do irja' with shirk (polytheism). _3. The munafiq (hypocrite)._ The hypocrite is someone who only utters with his tongue that he is a believer, but is actually a disbeliever in his heart, and he does not have any deeds on his limbs, or he does deeds on the limbs in order to show off or in order to shield himself from being exposed. The early hypocrites had to appear in the Mosques lest they were exposed as disbelievers, but today you won't find them there. These are worse than the idolaters and always work with the apartheid tribesmen, and will have the lowest depth of the Fire. Examples of them in our times are Maajid Nawaaz and Qanta Ahmed who actually do work for them, the former even funded by the rothschilds, and the latter, look up the things that she combats on her twitter. It is like the laws of physics, that a munafiq (hypocrite) or a murtad (apostate) sides and works for the jews by default. Allah سبحانه وتعالى said, وَإِذَا لَقُوا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا قَالُوا آمَنَّا وَإِذَا خَلَوْا إِلَىٰ شَيَاطِينِهِمْ قَالُوا إِنَّا مَعَكُمْ إِنَّمَا نَحْنُ مُسْتَهْزِئُونَ And when they (munafiqeen - hypocrites) meet those who believe, they say: "We believe," but when they are alone with their Shayateen (devils), they say: "Surely we are with you; verily, we were only mocking (that we are with the Muslims)." [Al-Baqarah 2:14] _Who are "their Shayateen (devils)"?_ From Abu Maalik Ghazwan Al-Ghifaari رحمه الله regarding Allah's ﷻ Words: ﴿وَإِذَا خَلَوْا إِلَىٰ شَيَاطِينِهِمْ﴾ And when they are alone with their Shayateen (devils). [Al-Baqarah 2:14] He said: مضوا They went ahead: ﴿إِلَىٰ شَيَاطِينِهِمْ﴾ to their Shayateen (devils). [Al-Baqarah 2:14] يعني: رؤوس اليهود, و كعب بن الأشرف Meaning: the heads of the Jews, and Ka'b Ibn Al-Ashraf." [Tafsir Ibn Abi Haatim 1/47] _4. The kuffar (disbelievers)._ They have no belief in the heart, nor utterance of the tongue as they rejected Eemaan (Faith), nor any good deeds on the limbs but only sins until it darkened the heart and all kinds of pains therein emerged, depressions, anxieties etc in order to give them a U-turn sign that they are on the wrong path and need to leave that path, yet they return not, but cling on to quick fixes of brief lusts and desires, and continue in the dark path until the edge (death) after having passed by all the U-turn signs. _Conclusion:_ Mankind consists of these types. Become Muslims O people so that you will taste the key to Paradise i.e. the light of Eemaan. Only the Malãa'ikah (angels), the Prophets and Believers have the light of Eemaan inside their hearts, but the levels of Eemaan differ. For example, Jibreel (Gabriel) عليه السلام descended and brought a vessel of gold filled with Eemaan (Faith) and Hikmah (wisdom) and then opened up the chest of the Prophet ﷺ and poured it into his noble heart. And the Sahaba (Companions of the Prophet ﷺ) رضي الله عنهم were asked if they used to laugh? And it was said, yes, while their Eemaan was similar to the mountains. If you believe in the 6 Pillars of Eemaan (Faith), and you practice the 5 Pillars of Islam sincerely without showing off, then you will attain Eemaan inside the heart and you'll enjoy life, feel content. And that will become your key into Jannah (Paradise). And everyone is welcome to Islam. _In order to get Eemaan_ 1. You have to cease associating partners with Allah ﷻ in Lordship (Rububiyyah), like stop saying that nature or atoms and gravity regulates and creates the world. Because not even idolaters believe that their inanimate idols created anything. So how can you believe that the inamitate particles that the idol consists of is the creator and regulator? Therefore you don't want to be lower in polytheism than idolaters. 2. You need to stop associating equals and partners with Allah ﷻ in worship (Uluhiyyah), like stop invoking saints, asking forgiveness of men behind a curtain, or worshipping Jesus or Mary عليهما السلام. Meaning, not doing any acts of worship like prostrating, bowing, vowing, sacrificing, seeking, refuge with, swearing and taking an oath on with anyone other than Allah ﷻ. 3. Certainty of the Afterlife. Not saying that you will turn to dust and vanish into non-existence. Because this ascribes shortcomings like injustice, indifference, creating the world with falsehood, not revealing the truth etc to Allah ﷻ. His Perfect Attributes that His work (creation) around you necessitated for His Majesty, Exalts Him from having equals (i.e. it refutes polytheism), and Exalts His Majesty from shortcoming like creating or doing things with falsehood and injustice (i.e. it refutes that the world exists with falsehood and vain i.e. disbelief in the Afterlife and not revealing the truth - Wahy (Revelation)). Thus this world exists bil-Haqq (with the absolute truth), seriousness and justice i.e. the Day of Judgement for which there is no doubt about. That is what you need in the heart. Allah سبحانه وتعالى said, وَمَا خَلَقْنَا السَّمَاءَ وَالْأَرْضَ وَمَا بَيْنَهُمَا بَاطِلًا ۚ ذَ‌ٰلِكَ ظَنُّ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا ۚ فَوَيْلٌ لِّلَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا مِنَ النَّارِ And We created not the heaven and the earth and all that is between them with falsehood! _That is the consideration of those who disbelieve!_ Then woe to those who disbelieve from the Fire! أَمْ نَجْعَلُ الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا وَعَمِلُوا الصَّالِحَاتِ كَالْمُفْسِدِينَ فِي الْأَرْضِ أَمْ نَجْعَلُ الْمُتَّقِينَ كَالْفُجَّارِ Shall We treat those who believe and do righteous good deeds as those who spread mischief on the earth? Or shall We treat the Muttaqun (the pious - God-fearing) as the Fujjar (wicked criminal sinners)? [Sad 38:27-28] أَمْ حَسِبَ الَّذِينَ اجْتَرَحُوا السَّيِّئَاتِ أَن نَّجْعَلَهُمْ كَالَّذِينَ آمَنُوا وَعَمِلُوا الصَّالِحَاتِ سَوَاءً مَّحْيَاهُمْ وَمَمَاتُهُمْ ۚ سَاءَ مَا يَحْكُمُونَ Or do those who earn evil deeds think that We shall hold them equal with those who believe and do righteous good deeds, in their present life and after their death? Worst is the judgement that they make. وَخَلَقَ اللَّهُ السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالْأَرْضَ بِالْحَقِّ وَلِتُجْزَىٰ كُلُّ نَفْسٍ بِمَا كَسَبَتْ وَهُمْ لَا يُظْلَمُونَ And Allah has created the heavens and the earth _bil-Haqq (With Truth);_ in order that each Nafs (self, soul, person) may be recompensed for that which it has earned, and they will not be wronged. [Al-Jaathiyah 45:21-22]

[@one23four68]

@@Ibn_Abdulaziz what is a madthkali?

[@Ibn_Abdulaziz]

@@one23four68 When the groups called khawaarij who hate unjust tyrranic Muslim rulers began declaring rulers as disbelievers and sought to rebel against them appeared, then likewise a similar group called ikhwanis who had similar goals but instead took the path of incrementalism, infiltration, lurking and skulking by way of compromising the religion, pragmatism and nifaq (hypocrisy) appeared too. The Madkhalis are Salafis with sound 'Aqidah who appeared as a result to combat those two groups. But what happened is that they became similar to mccarthyism. Those familiar with american politics during the cold war, saw that mccarthyism began declaring everyone as a communist until it ruined peoples lives and careers. Madkhalism are Salafis that went into extreme similar to mccarthyism. Just like mccarthyism began hurling communism at everyone, then madkhalis began making Tabdee' (declaring a person an innovater) on everyone, like saying: a khaariji or ikhwani or qutbi, or suroori etc.

[@Ibn_Abdulaziz]

@@one23four68 Therefore, if anyone attacked the mccarthyists, it appeared that such a person was actually anti-america himself, when it could've just been that he was refuting the injustice and false accusations of the mccarthians. Likewise the madkhalis shield themselves with "anti-Salafism". Because Salafiyyah is proper Islam. And many fall into traps looking like khawaarij and jahmites when they engage with the madkhalis. Look at Muhammad Hijab, he attacked the madkhalis just to end up appearing as an ash'ari. He attacks scholars like Ibn Taymiyyah, Al-Albaani رحمهما الله, calls Al-Fawzaan حفظه الله "a pope of the Salafis", and recently belittled Kitaab At-Tawhid and the books of Shaykh Muhammad bin 'Abdul-Wahhab رحمه الله. That's what happens to those who engage with Madkhalis, they get frustrated and become unhinged and expose many things within themselves. The sufis who are grave worshippers call everyone, even other sufis that criticize their charlatry, sihr (magic) etc as "wahhabis". Only other Salafis can deal with madkhalis. I've not seen a single person outside the Salafi community defeat the madkhalis.

[@zaidazam2592]

SAJID i understand your view and i respect that . But what are the criterions to be muslim ruler does any muslim come with sword and power sits on throne of muslim country will be called muslim ruler ? i am not saying khuruj is better but we need to stop calling them muslim rulers . they are just muslim tyrants . muslim ruler should be choosen by the muslims and have freedom for telling the ruler what is right and whats wrong or vise versa . May allah guide us

[@DZHayet]

What you are doing is wrong.

[@brokenSnake]

Daniel has done quite a bit of good work to represent Muslims but he does tend to be very aggressive with his arguments. I hope the Muslims and their representatives will unite before it's too late.

[@jshanaa]

ما فعلتَه اخ ساجد وحتى لو لم تصف دانيال مباشرة كخارجي إلا أن مقدمتك وافعالك وهذا الطرح يعني أنك صنفت دانيال وانتهيت، ولا معنى لقولك أنا لا اتهمه أو اصنفه، فهو اما من أهل السنة أو من غيرهم. وتهمة الخارجية في عصرنا هذا اسوء عند الناس من القول بخلق القرآن ونفي علو الله وإنكار حد الزنا أو القول بأن اليهود والنصارى ليسوا كفارا. انت تحرق اخيك و"تلغيه" بهذه التهمة الشنيعة.

[@geniunerf4868]

Disappointed in bro sajid

[@Nache1]

Daniel is a great brother, but not infallible. May Allah almighty guide us all to the right path

[@محمد-ك8ر9ث]

@Tawheed Promoter قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم : …ومن قال في مؤمن ما ليس فيه أسكنه الله ردغة الخبال حتى يخرج مما قال

[@apba2240]

@@محمد-ك8ر9ث and the moment you realize it is for true beilevers not for munafiq and ignorants.....

[@محمد-ك8ر9ث]

@@apba2240 if your reply is supposed to mean anything then it shows that you’re closer to the manhaj of khawarij than anyone else

[@apba2240]

@@محمد-ك8ر9ث and your comment above is actually for you I guess .........I didn't say he is khwarijj ....but not a good muslim skeptic....as he shows....even after listening him ....spreading falsehood about other religion and demeaning islamic scholars .......you still approve of him I say qayamah is near....

[@محمد-ك8ر9ث]

@@apba2240empty accusations and exaggerations? That’s all you got? Ok

[@mabusnaneh]

When did Daniel make takfeer or these accusations you’re saying he did?

[@udaramalam7348]

I have been waiting your response about this matter, alhamdulillah you keep steadfast upon manhaj, may Allah preserve us

[@hotaryuzaki]

Muhammad hijab, ali dawah, smile to jannah brother, makin lama makin jelas mereka bukan manhaj salafy melainkan manhaj IM. Shamsi memang sejak dulu bilang mereka akrab dgn IM di Inggris. Kita dukung dakwah mereka kepada orang kafir, tapi dakwah mereka bermanhaj IM kita tentang secara terbuka

[@Haroon38931]

@@hotaryuzaki What is IM bro

[@udaramalam7348]

@@hotaryuzaki that is why there is saying that we have to choose friends wisely

[@fieldmarshal7081]

Mashallah you spoke about the big elephant in the room that people were using against. I myself was scratching my head that you haven’t address it before but alhamdulilah it’s done and on top of that in a very nice educational way. Allahumabarik

[@911mossadvanbomberplotaipa8]

Daniel has done work against liberals, but Islam is the middle path and he sadly has errored on the opposite extreme of imams to be fair! View : *Daniel Haqiqatjou Refuted* - by Firqat Najiyah view : *Sulayman Al Ulwan Refuted Strongly* - by : Abu Shaybah Al Muhammadi Al Ulwan : "If he judges by other then Allah's law even while saying Allah's law is better, he is a polytheist" - Refuted by Tafsir ibn Abbas Quran 5 :44 by Ibn Kathir! Dan worked with Saifudin who calls to Al Ulwan, he should denounce and not work with him.

[@onemessage5462]

You don't need to make any video criticizing your muslims brothers it better to do against enemies of islam not your brothers all your videos like this enough

[@abdullahjaber7621]

It doesn’t matter if someone is Muslim or not. If they say something wrong about Islam, then they must be refuted/corrected. Even if all of his videos were about refuting Muslims, unless what he’s saying is incorrect then there is no reason to stop.

[@theoldrsftw]

you have to correct their wrong doing.

[@onemessage5462]

Correct your Muslim brothers privately , use your time to fight enemies of islam is much better than all video about your brothers mistakes

[@aminelak1452]

As an Arab muslim and Algerian, who lived through the Arab spring, you weren't there when they invaded iraq and we couldn't do nothing, you werent there when they killed Mohamed al-durra and we did nothing and Mohamed Morsi and we did nothing , during those times for the first time we had hope , i remember my father screamed of joy when Morsi won , we really thought things will change , we went through a lot of tragedies , you weren't part of it so please don't speak about things u didn't experience and yes many people refused the idea of us trying to overthrow our leaders, but the hadith of the prophet was about muslim leaders , not who pretend to be muslims, our leaders are not muslims , not because they sinned or something like that , but because simply they don't believe in islam,

[@heromys9463]

You claim that our leaders pretend to be muslim. Do you have any proof of that? Or did you open their hearts?? If someone claims to be a muslim, we cannot claim that that person is a hypocrite, as even the prophet did not know who the hypocrites were in his time, only after Gabriel informed him about it through revelation. If a leader indeed has become a disbeliever, and you have conclusive evidence of that by Allah Almighty, then the situation is different.

[@TheAnonYmouse]

@@heromys9463 It's a complex topic, but what if they attend interfaith prayer ceremonies and rituals and push pagan celebrations? I think they should be informed what they're doing is wrong, but they may lock you up. May Allah save the ummah. The prophet (peace be upon him) said he who imitates a people is one of them, too.

[@barryirlandi4217]

I think there is more to it than just that.

[@aminelak1452]

@@heromys9463 when they execute scholars and blame islam for their failures , am pretty sure they r not muslim

[@alokozay300]

@@aminelak1452 i believe they are not Muslim becuase ruling with mans laws instead of Sharia is kufr akbar, but even if they are kuffar you cant rebell unless the benefits of the rebellion outweigh the costs and in the case that its not Muslims fighting on both sides of the conflict which is very rare in our nations nowadays.

[@thewaytosalvation145]

Starting with bismillah and then saying all this filth. Fear Allah oh muslims

[@MilahanPhilosophersCorner]

A very complicated topic for me. I need more understanding concerning those terms. Thank you for the lesson brother.

[@saninakakana6931]

@@youtubeowl9544 because he had a library behind him, he automatically became extremely knowledgeable? What benefit did rebellion in Syria breed? Sisters selling themselves in Europe to feed their families. The Kharijites, like Ali (RA) said, utilize the Qur'an and hadith to suit their skewed vision of the truth. The Kharijites and Shiites were grouped together by Ibn Taymiyyah (RH). One wonders whether these aren't just covert Shias trying to corrupt the muslim youth in order for them to take themselves to useless deaths. May Allah protect us from misguidance. Amin.

[@gagakputih3136]

Saud overthrown ottoman.... Irony....

[@zanajaf]

Brother Sajjid, if it was a mistake for you to promote brother Daniel Haqiqatjou, it is even a bigger mistake to make a video like this. Why do you even need to talk about people? Just spread your message and let people alone.

[@abdulkadir9319]

Jazakallahu khair brother May Allah reward you in abundance for the spreading the truth and keep you firm on the straight path ameen

[@911mossadvanbombersclassif4]

Daniel has done work against liberals, but Islam is the middle path and he sadly has errored on the opposite extreme of imams to be fair! View : *Daniel Haqiqatjou Refuted* - by Firqat Najiyah view : *Sulayman Al Ulwan Refuted Strongly* - by : Abu Shaybah Al Muhammadi Al Ulwan : "If he judges by other then Allah's law even while saying Allah's law is better, he is a polytheist" - Refuted by Tafsir ibn Abbas Quran 5 :44 by Ibn Kathir! Dan worked with Saifudin who calls to Al Ulwan, he should denounce and not work with him.

[@dayurwarfa9762]

*"تركنا الأمر بالمعروف والنهي عن المنكر حتى خرج علينا أهل المنكر ينهوننا عن المعروف ويقنعوننا بالمنكر !! "* *"We left enjoining what is good and forbidding what is evil until the people of evil came out against us, forbidding us from good and convincing us about evil!!"*

[@somedude6334]

Who is this statement attributed to Dayur?! Barakallahu Feekum

[@dayurwarfa9762]

@@somedude6334 To the Ummah, Wa fiyk Baaraka Allahu

[@mohammedkamalhussain3694]

I've never seen the people you suggest are khawarij EVER encourage rebellion. Saying MBS is a unjust person, a utter wasteman, a man with Muslim blood on his hand are just factual statements.

[@AliSyed711]

Much worse things can be attributed to Baibars, Mahmud Ghaznavi, Aurangzeb, Murad II, Muhammad II al Fatih and Suleyman the Magnificent. Yet, they are regarded as the greatest Muslim rulers after Hishaam ibn Abdil Malik. Rulers will never be perfect until the coming of the Mahdi and Esa ibn Maryam but islamically, it is impermissible to circulate hatred towards the rulers as stability of strong Muslim states is preferred. If Daniel’s ideology has prevailed in previous times, the Mongols would have overrun the Muslim world, India may never have been conquered, the crusade of Varna would have been successful and the Romans would have remained in Constantinople, hindering Muslim expansion.

[@not_hAck3r]

@@AliSyed711 So should a leader keep becoming more secular and do more haram? What should we do?

[@AliSyed711]

@@not_hAck3r This matter has not been given to us. Allah will not question us about the acts of the Muslim leaders. We must worry about ourselves. The scholars or anyone with leverage over them must advise the Muslim rulers privately. If you want to help those who are in need, instead of inspiring resentment against stable Muslim governments, one could give in sadaqa and make du’a. The many previous achievements of Islam after the khulafa Ar-Rashidun would not have been possible if the Muslims could not attain political stability.

[@maazmustafa2322]

He probably is but why do we get ourselves busy with that. What is it gonna achieve? Even if u live in Saudi can u achieve anything by saying this? Imam Tahhawi also said it is impermissible to pray against a ruler.

[@maazmustafa2322]

@@not_hAck3r We are commanded to even pray behind an openly sinful leader

[@kamtarbol]

Wisdom of Rasulullah (s.a.w) is just miraculous and impeccable Subhanallah!

[@mohamedsayid6403]

Your understanding of the principles of Ahlu sunna Wal-jamac is amazing may Allah keep you the right path.

[@thestraightpath.5036]

You are absolutely wrong brother. This is the pure doctrine of Brother Muslims. It's pretty much obvious.

[@amera3009]

@Tawheed Promoter I advise you to check out the channel “Maktabah Al-Sahaba” which focuses exclusively on the words of the salaf regarding very important matters of aqeeda

[@9-11amossadvanbomberplotai9]

@@twoplus7647 Jazak Allahu Khayr.but are you sure thats thr right number, would that be on the sunnah site?

[@9-11amossadvanbomberplotai9]

@Tawheed Promoter you should recommend thalath usul and 4 principles of shirk by ibn Abdul Wahab... a salat book of his or Albanis... say thats beginning and then the next 4 books you mentioned as 2nd half grounding for beginners...

[@Omar-Asim]

@Tawheed Promoter Why do you say the books of the Salaf when none of the authors you mentioned are from the three pious generations?

[@ebumuhammedalbani2818]

The hadith that you brought forward is a muslim that prays salat the ruler is muslim not kufar dont twist the hadith fear Allah

[@baabdoul610]

I envourage you to follow Saajid lipham Abdourahman hassan Khalid Green Tim Humble Abu taymiyyah

[@أبوشغل]

@@basedblackbeard4456 You will be held accountable for this slander.

[@ronin-9941]

Brother, Perhaps there's a misunderstanding here, brother Daniel only called some bootlickers and so who were calling him a khariji for criticizing the celebration of kuffar festival in ard Alharamain

[@pedroorovio4699]

This comment shows that you haven't watched the video as he clearly stated he's not calling Daniel a khariji let a lone a kafir.

[@ronin-9941]

@@pedroorovio4699 This comment shows you didn't understand mine, I clearly didn't say that, I merely pointed out the misunderstanding where bro Sajid said he doesn't side with bro Daniel.

[@pedroorovio4699]

@@ronin-9941 You said "who were calling him a khariji"

[@ronin-9941]

@@pedroorovio4699 so?

[@pedroorovio4699]

@@ronin-9941 When did saajid call him a kharjji as you claimed?

[@3a2roub]

السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته، I've always been a supporter and admirer of you both, may Allah guide us all to the straight path brother. I haven't myself seen videos of Daniel speaking out against rulers in Muslim countries, but in Daniel's defense I think what makes this matter especially difficult and a big fitnah nowadays is the fact that the rulers themselves are considered to be in this huge grey area that some would argue constitutes as clear and open kufur. For instance, a country like the KSA fighting all forms of religious practices and imprisoning scholars who are well known to be righteous and moderate for years on end, while at the same time encouraging pagan traditions like halloween, zionism normalization, women liberation and so on.. My point being is that while many of their actions though are not kufur in the same sense as mocking of the Quran or Allah swt, yet are crystal clear in showing their true evil intentions and animosity towards the religion (the Abrahamic 3-in-1 religion propaganda in the emirates is a good example). Anyone with unbiased foresight would easily label the prince as an enemy of Islam, and that is not to say that citizens need to do khuruj on this or the UAE's ruler. I believe Allah and the prophet peace be upon him are clear in showing us that this happens when the society as a whole is corrupt and stops doing amr bil ma'arouf wal nahi 'anil munkar. I always remember that this deen is becoming a stranger (ghareeb) once more like when it began, hence I feel it would be wise to consider ourselves to be living in the Meccan period of revelation when the utmost focus was around personal Iman strengthening and learning tawheed and being patient and righteous. If we start individually and within our immediate surroundings going back to our religion as much as we can, Allah would surely and easily fix this issue with rulers. Just my two cents, thoughts?

[@royadurmaz]

Nice take, I agree. You reminded me of the verse 13:11 "... Indeed, Allah will not change the condition of a people until they change what is in themselves..."

[@theoldrsftw]

"KSA fighting all forms of religious practices" like what? imprisoning "scholars" mostly had wrong ideology. give me one name who was falsely imprisoned.

[@3a2roub]

​@@theoldrsftw I am not saying you will see clear laws saying you may not pray or grow a beard, but things like emptying the masjid Al-Haram and Kaaba area under covid pretext while keeping malls well open and busy, no longer requiring shops to close during times of prayer, not requiring women to be covered in public, allowing for "undercover" jews to enter haram and film in spite, removing any sort of power from the committee of amr bil ma'rouf wal nahi 'anil munkar while empowering the committee for "recreation" via music concerts and rappers and "artists" to come poison the youth with obscene content (isnt music being haram unanimous among scholars with this ruling going back to the first century? isn't the partying and mixing and non-muslim conduct in these events haram at least? why would one rapper be gifted a lamborghini by the ruler? is he among المؤلفة قلوبهم؟ As for one name who was falsely imprisoned, there are over 60 scholars and I honestly fear if you are among those who label them as extremists or takfeer-folks or wahabis or i don't know what, the last of which being Saleh Al-Taleb whose crime was the unspeakable act of giving advice to the rulers by saying: اتقوا الله If you want other names: الطريفي، سلمان العودة، عوض القرني، إبراهيم السكران، سليمان العلوان، خالد الراشد، محمد صالح المنجد، بدر العتيبي، عبدالعزيز فوزان، إدريس أبكر، محمد الخضيري.. The list goes on. I do not wish to argue, you are free to think and endorse whomever you wish, after all, we are both going to be asked alone in the hands of God about each small and big position we took in life.

[@fayrouza7415]

Egypt's presedant has literaly said "we need to reform the religious speech" He locks people up for having a beard, and they tried to prevent Niqap from uni one time. So yeah, I hope we rebell and finally kick him out of our country. The man let Israeli Jews in Sina, our land, and sold another part of the country to the Saudi gov.

[@ydel1234]

@@theoldrsftw you asked for 1, he gave you 11.

[@HaliliArber]

May Allah reward you brother.

[@nothajzl]

*reward you with the best Amin

[@HaliliArber]

@@nothajzl u r right, my bad, may Allah reward him with khayr!

[@nothajzl]

@@HaliliArber amin

[@IamSaud_YT]

Firstly, the hadith in Sahih Muslim talks about taking swords against a Muslim ruler which DH never told his viewers to take arms against Saudi govt. Secondly, he has done a lot of good for this Unmah. For the love of Allah SWT don’t you think it’s better to talk to him first on this before saying this “I dissociate from him”?? Seriously, brother those islamophobes are laughing right now who got dismantled intellectually by him. Shame on us, May Allah guide us all.

[@IbnThabitVerlag]

Allahumma ameen ya rabb!

[@ascha730]

Brother Saajid this is quite dishonest. No one says that if someone isn't applying 0.1% shariah that they aren't kuffar. It isn't about applying the shariah but rather about actively changing the shariah. You went on and on about khawarij but didn't said almost irjaa

[@aaliyah3037]

The same people coming for Saudi also praise the ottomom rule. Now tell me how much of the shariah did the ottomom sultan apply?

[@alia-wm8ug]

@@aaliyah3037 you are actually comparing the Ottomans with Saudis!? You need to do some more unbiased reading.

[@AereForst]

﷽ I watched DH’s video today and he made some excellent points. I however find his name-calling disgraceful and disrespectful. He also fell into plain slander (Nameema) by insinuating that anyone who stands by a particular interpretation of Prophetic teaching is an “agent” and a “Madkhali”. This is fitna and dissension. As someone who was not born a Muslim this saddens me. I have tremendous respect for Br. Saajid for his scholarship, humility and adab. Reminds me of the men who guided me into this beautiful religion. Daniel is a very good and zealous brother but in dire need of more humility and lessons in adab. He is way too judgmental on a personal level and too free with insults. This betrays an immaturity that will cost him with Allah. May Allah ﷻ elevate his and our Dhikr, awareness, knowledge and adab and keep this Ummah united. Worse times are coming and this dissension and division is very destructive. ‏و كان الله بعون عباده المخلصين

[@AereForst]

@le rayon vert You keep drinking that Kool-Aid, friend.

[@yusufkariim3781]

السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته Brother Sajid, Daniel may have made some mistakes in his rhetoric, but I don't think disowning him in this manner is the best decision to make especially that there are many Muslims who see you both as influencers in the Da'wah scene. This may lead to disunity and Fitna that could be avoided. Maybe it would be better to clarify everything just the way you did in the video without disowning and wait his response which I hope will be positive. If he insists, that is when the next step may be necessary.

[@a.b4531]

Did you watch the video until the end ? He didn’t “disown” him as you said at all. He said he thanked the individual for his tremendous work regarding some topics, but takes distance from him regarding other topics. That’s it

[@9-11amossadvanbomberplotai9]

Daniel has done work against liberals, but Islam is the middle path and he sadly has errored on the opposite end with extreme ones. We have to be fair! View : *Daniel Haqiqatjou Refuted* - by Firqat Najiyah view : *Sulayman Al Ulwan Refuted Strongly* - by : Abu Shaybah Al Muhammadi Al Ulwan : "If he judges by other then Allah's law even while saying Allah's law is better, he is a polytheist" - Refuted by Tafsir ibn Abbas Quran 5 :44 by Ibn Kathir! Dan worked with Saifudin who calls to Al Ulwan, he should denounce and not work with him.

[@gooner2047]

Jazaka'allahu khairan brother sajid! You couldn't of explained it any better 🤝🏻 it's a honour

[@mohamedishagh8492]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/mKvJf2uheJ5gftk

[@9-11amossadvanbomberplotai9]

@Tawheed Promoter you should recommend thalath usul and 4 principles of shirk by ibn Abdul Wahab... a salat book of his or Albanis... say thats beginning and then the next 4 books you mentioned as 2nd half grounding for beginners...

[@Olenk555]

I come to this channel again and again only cos he speaks against all da'ees out there that i watch. Lol.

[@Someone-vz2bo]

Sheikh Bin Baz said: “If the people of truth did not speak out in clarification of the truth, then the people of error would remain upon their mistakes, others would blindly follow them in that, and the sin of withholding the truth would fall back on those who remained silent.” [Fatawa Bin Baz, (3/72)]

[@khaledkamal89]

Nearly half of the sahaba have different opinion, even the grandson of the prophet, they rebelled against a muslim leader who not only established prayer but established sharia, what do you say to that ?

[@aminelmessaoudi1107]

May Allah reward you for including educational content in these kind of videos

[@rtcblood5714]

My goal is that they may be encouraged in heart and united in love, so that they may have the full riches of complete understanding, in order that they may know the mystery of God, namely, Christ, Colossians 2

[@rtcblood5714]

Muslims, stop fighting and love each other!

[@Ibn_Abdulaziz]

Madkhalis are Salafis in 'Aqidah, it is their hizbiyyah towards Rabee' Al-Madkhali that turns them into a sect. As for the khawaarij, then they have nothing to do with Salafis. Madkhalis should be encouraged to become moderate since they are associated with the word Salafiyyah and bring stains and hate towards the truth with their behaviour. All of these groups should become obsolete, no more madkhalism, ikhwanism or khawaarijism. But starting fresh as brothers who love one another like the Muhajirun and Ansaar. Only allowing people of Tawhid and Sunnah amongst us. No grave worshippers, asharis or maturidis, or tablighis or deobandis etc. Those grave worshippers brought a reminder of Noah's عليه السلام flood to Pakistan. Also banning anyone that brings his ignorant cultures into the religion or follow extreme taqleed that violates the Sunnah. We have to create a benchmark for Islam and madkhalis are Salafis that should be encouraged to cease hating believers that don't like Rabee' Al-Madkhali and assist the believers, find them and love them.

[@thestraightpath.5036]

The way I see things , Mr Saajid has been completely misled by Brother Muslims. It is truly disappointing.

[@Ibn_Abdulaziz]

We have a chance in the west to start fresh. White american converts have a chance to lead the western Sunni Muslims if they understand the plan of my online government app. Because when they become believers upon Tawhid and Sunnah, there's no residue of Jahiliyyah culture amidst them, it's only pure Islam. Whereas a pakistani or arab, or somali, or turkish, will bring nationalism, tribalism and their cultures into the Deen. Also people look up to white europeans since the west is dominant. Therefore the white european people should become sincere believers. I told the bible belters that since they consist of the american military, if they were Muslims they would not have tolerated the things that's going on in America. They would've ceased power and maybe established a Caliphate on earth. But the polytheism and ignorance of christianity is their weakness. Therefore those among them who have knowledge and are upon Tawhid and Sunnah should take charge over the leadership of the Sunni Muslims of the west and aid the Deen of Allah. Be severe against sufi and liberals, blm pagans etc. It is their turn in my opinion. There are also prophecies that they will re-conquer Constantinople.

[@soulcandy5758]

What if a ruler is not elected by shura and is the leader through bloodline, Muslim shall be their servants for ever?

[@Evkayne]

I love you brother Saajid for sake of Allah :)

[@themanwithnoname3145]

Glad to see a response, we as muslims dont stick to any celebrity speakers, regardless if we considered them friends and allies, if they go against the quran and sunnah, we have to declare the truth and call out the falsehood, jazakallahu khair

[@fark69]

So, you have to speak out against Daniel, who should not have spoken out against the Saudi rulers (who are not rulers over him) for allowing people to do shirk publicly in the streets? Is that right? Sounds twisted to me...

[@aaliyah3037]

@@fark69 Follow the sunnah, not your whims and desires.

[@slainless]

@@abdulnoorhussam1226 I sense sarcasm in this, i hope im not wrong haha

[@Nothingburger90]

@Tawheed Promoter and saudi dont have any authorities on people living OUTSIDE and not a citizen of saudi

[@MyBuzzL]

@Tawheed Promoter yeah, just like khawarij muhammad bin hambal rebel against caliph ottoman

[@AkiimboGaming1]

May Allah bless Br Daniel H .

[@mohammedbachir6909]

Baraka Allahu fik brother sajid.clear and understood.keep on making such necessary videos.May Allah reward you.ameen.

[@marxistsabusegermansatn-bu38]

Daniel has done work against liberals, but Islam is the middle path and he sadly has errored on the opposite extreme of imams to be fair! View : *Daniel Haqiqatjou Refuted* - by Firqat Najiyah view : *Sulayman Al Ulwan Refuted Strongly* - by : Abu Shaybah Al Muhammadi Al Ulwan : "If he judges by other then Allah's law even while saying Allah's law is better, he is a polytheist" - Refuted by Tafsir ibn Abbas Quran 5 :44 by Ibn Kathir! Dan worked with Saifudin who calls to Al Ulwan, he should denounce and not work with him.

[@doobyross8427]

Alhamdulillah brother. I find that Daniel Haqiqatjou has done a great job exposing certain deviants in the dawah scene but it seemed to me recently that he touched on topics that he has little knowledge of. Brother Saajid, continue to tell the truth and clarify it at any cost. Criticisms are not negative things but things that help us perfect ourselves. May Allah ﷻ guide us all and make us victorious in this life and the next.

[@doobyross8427]

A reminder to me and to all the brothers / sisters: We must study our religion in order not to be deceived and to follow the Right Path. We cannot always rely on the da'ee

[@SlugRiot]

@@anonymousnoticer provide proof before you make outlandish claims

[@doobyross8427]

@@anonymousnoticer May Ar Rahim ﷻ guide us.

[@falcon6329]

@@anonymousnoticer give clear evidence of deviant statements he said

[@bf6724]

@@anonymousnoticer Who do you mean?