Thanks for the big, red arrow so I know who Napoleon is
@aqiltijani4646 Жыл бұрын
yw
@Justpassingby204 Жыл бұрын
@@aqiltijani4646 you make the thumbnail?
@DavidNietoRamos Жыл бұрын
Made my day
@deerlow1851 Жыл бұрын
I spent hours looking before I saw the red arrow and then it all made sense.
@spore6050 Жыл бұрын
@@user-fg6zp6kw3eshit i thought he was the pawn
@quinnthehobbit6680 Жыл бұрын
It’s very interesting that Napoleon’s strategy was so sacrificial. Most chess players and strategists are very protective of their resources, but it seems as though Napoleon was always looking for how to best throw away his pieces. He held strategic positions to be more valuable than his pieces, and once those pieces served their purpose they were used one final time. Although this worked fine in chess, I think this mindset is what failed him in the end.
@DailyWorldWideNews945 Жыл бұрын
Its very debatable that this game was actually played by napoleon. Even though he played chess sometimes, he knew very little about it. Histrorians assume that this game was not played like this and polished for propaganda, with this sacrifice presenting him as a tactical genius (which he was but as i said he wasnt very good at chess).
@xyihhz4262 Жыл бұрын
well holy shit his army got wiped out but but hefricking won
@asorbli Жыл бұрын
His mindset worked brilliantly if it werent for the Russian winter, due to France immense ressources
@xxx_jim_the_reaper_xxx Жыл бұрын
@@asorbli I think the reason why Napoleon lost was lack of resources and he loses more soldiers than what he can sacrifice. Training veteran soldiers takes time and that is what exactly Napoleon doesn't have.
@cristiano7541 Жыл бұрын
Maybe not that, but some cold did
@valentinodbd Жыл бұрын
Shoutout to people who went back in time and watched this game and recorded it.
@DailyWorldWideNews945 Жыл бұрын
Its very debatable that this game was actually played by napoleon. Even though he played chess sometimes, he knew very little about it. Histrorians assume that this game was not played like this and polished for propaganda, with this sacrifice presenting him as a tactical genius (which he was but as i said he wasnt very good at chess).
@sashimi879 Жыл бұрын
@@DailyWorldWideNews945 source?
@DailyWorldWideNews945 Жыл бұрын
@@sashimi879 I actually saw the same game in an other channel with 400 k subs and they said it. Also makes lots more sense. If you just look at the moves you can see that he had nearly no theory knowledge. His sacrifice also would have been pointless if his opponent had chosen the right moves. All of that are signs of a chess beginner.
@DailyWorldWideNews945 Жыл бұрын
@@sashimi879 Also i found a quora post where one of the answers where: From memory. The published games from him are certainly false . Only one or two are genuine.General Bertrand , his old friend, wrote in his memoirs that Napoleon played incredibly badly . Once , he played a game with a general. The general said to Napoleon , before the game;: Show me one of my pieces , I will mate you with this one . And the general won the game as he announced.General Bertrand wrote that he was bad at this game because he always wanted to reproduce battlefield tactics.
@archsteel7 Жыл бұрын
Of Napoleons many faults, getting salty and killing people who beat him at chess was not one of them. If he was, Marshal Ney would not have survived.
@reginaldstoic Жыл бұрын
Yeah, same with Bernadotte. They had some serious beef.
@archsteel7 Жыл бұрын
@@reginaldstoic That said, while it probably wouldn’t over a chess game, Napoleon did have a nasty habit of hamstringing the careers of people he personally didn’t like. He could be remarkably petty, but he wasn’t some insecure warlord killing anyone who hurt his ego.
@troll5161 Жыл бұрын
If he played against Marshal Davout, that would be a great battle
@wowyourereallyreadingthis Жыл бұрын
Ok who would win in a Marshalls+Napoleon Chess tournament?
@archsteel7 Жыл бұрын
@@wowyourereallyreadingthis Depends on the Marshal. Napoleon was about half as good of a strategist as he said he was, which was really impressive because his ego was massive. He also didn’t uniformly promote marshals based on merit. Some of them were actually excellent tacticians who worked their way up the ranks because they deserved to be at the top. And some of them were there because Napoleon liked them. It was still much more of a meritocracy than under the Bourbon’s, but there was still a fair bit of nepotism.
@loris.rodriguez Жыл бұрын
what irritates me is to see people who do not know the strategy of the emperor, show him as a strategist who sacrificed his soldiers without stopping. while in reality it was quite the opposite, his greatest victory was achieved in numerical inferiority and was mainly based on the analysis of the forces and the environment of the battlefield
@caledonhockley883 Жыл бұрын
Exactly. It irritates me too. Also the fact he said you’d be guillotined for beating him
@ravenblood1954 Жыл бұрын
From a tactical level he didn’t use his men as fodder, but his chess tactics do demonstrate the personality trait that he had which led to his ultimate downfall. He was too willing to continue on a costly action so long as he felt that the that the strategic outcome would lead to victory. To use an analogy, he kept pressing towards Moscow despite heavy losses thinking Moscow was checkmate. When it turns out it wasn’t, he realized he had no pieces left to play with because he sacrificed them all to to capture a position which wasn’t going to end the game, and all that he had left only gave him enough to lose slowly.
@Gumper30 Жыл бұрын
Napoleon's strategies are very interesting to me because it almost seems like he was a very pragmatic and calculating person who came to the conclusion that if he harnessed his charasima properly then it would let him use prestige and renown as a battlefield/logistics tactic in its own right. I don't think he really cared when he was throwing his men's lives away on a gamble he knew was likely to fail or by not sending others to their aide (although the same is probably true for most other 'great generals'), but he knew the propaganda power that an occasional "valiant defeat" or "last stand" could have, and he exploited that wherever he could in order to keep his limited manpower where he needed it most for as long as possible
@primary2630 Жыл бұрын
Almost like they dont know what theyre talking about and think chess actually has anything to do with real war
@ravenblood1954 Жыл бұрын
@@primary2630 Not in the literal sense. In the same way that reading doesn’t make you a good writer, but the thought processes are similar. Napoleon’s chess more describes his personality as a general more than his tactics, if that makes any sense
@DarthFhenix55 Жыл бұрын
4:38 Yeah, because he was in an island in the middle of nowhere and was about to dying.
@cocotheclown10 Жыл бұрын
I would beat Napoleon and become the new emperor 🤴
@cameroncammell8375 Жыл бұрын
I as Pope somebody 1st proclaim you Emperor of the french
@troll5161 Жыл бұрын
@@cameroncammell8375 I didn't know Pope Water the First existed
@cameroncammell8375 Жыл бұрын
@@troll5161 no I'm pope somebody
@inkoin7024 Жыл бұрын
Englishman, please stop saying your neck would be on the line if you were to win against Napoleon. People have played Napoleon and won and nothing happened to them.
@smantheman2312 Жыл бұрын
curious how they were never heard from again...
@fliegendeluftwaffeli835 Жыл бұрын
Yeah.
@Karlvonstinky Жыл бұрын
Bro the game was played in 1820 Napoleon already got defeated and sent to St. Helena. Napoleon literally had no power to guillotine anyone...
@maximilianrobespierre8365 Жыл бұрын
Anglos mad
@Jester343 Жыл бұрын
@@Karlvonstinky The 2000 British soldiers still worrying he could do it:
@Simon-yv4jm Жыл бұрын
4:42 first of all, Napoleon was not a leader in 1820, and secondly, even if he was, he literally was the guy that stopped unnecessary executions after the revolution, so this is funny because of how awfully inaccurate this is good job with these jokes
@tarikvehab8938 Жыл бұрын
apparently Lenin was very good at chess, could you do a video on him
@ComplexityUnleashed Жыл бұрын
i mean he had the IQ (At least 140), and it is the game i would expect him to play.
@Randomboi863 Жыл бұрын
He probably valued every piece the same
@jestfullgremblim8002 Жыл бұрын
@@Randomboi863 bro lol
@quixotes4478 Жыл бұрын
@@Randomboi863 what part of each according to their ability to each according to their need do you not understand?
@GoldMoonGuy Жыл бұрын
@@Randomboi863 "Everyone is a pawn." - Vladimir Lenin
@iron4517 Жыл бұрын
napoleon wasnt the kind of man to kill someone just because he lost a game of chess
@onnoquinten2944 Жыл бұрын
next he will show us a game between thanos and jesus
@deadass_edwin.2002 Жыл бұрын
I'd pay money to see Thanos and Jesus playing chess while talking about their ideologies and philosophies in a similar manner to Prof X and Magneto.
@dionhall6800 Жыл бұрын
He learned his history from McDonalds
@jelstone20 Жыл бұрын
same place you got your humour recognition.
@dionhall6800 Жыл бұрын
@@jelstone20 same place you were conceived.
@jelstone20 Жыл бұрын
@Dion Hall you really showed me with that comment, congratulations 😆
@dionhall6800 Жыл бұрын
@@jelstone20 your only proving my point with that reply.
@jelstone20 Жыл бұрын
@@dionhall6800 not really, but if it makes you happy to believe it I'm good with it brother.
@LaneSight Жыл бұрын
By 1820 Napoleon was a discheveled man on exile in the middle of the Atlantic, not much fear of him
@aTf2SoldierMain Жыл бұрын
Ah yea, because in 1820, 5 years after Napoleon lost at Waterloo and was exiled to Saint Helena, he would definitely execute you for beating him at chess.
@itsalmostfun8567 Жыл бұрын
who tought the worlds smartest strategist in the 1800 made an opening
@williethomas5116 Жыл бұрын
"Napoleon was a big believer in sacrificing pawns." The Duke of Wellington was very good at getting those pawns to betray Napoleon.
@jestfullgremblim8002 Жыл бұрын
It weirds me out a bit how many historical figures were good at chess. I actually am very skeptical about these games... They are fun either way.
@lhumanoideerrantdesinterne8598 Жыл бұрын
Not that weird, there weren't that many sources of entertainment at the time, so these guys spent a lot more time on chess than most people today.
@kidadrip6953 Жыл бұрын
I didnt notice napoleon on thumbnail so that big red arrow helps so much! Thanks!
@ottomeister8 Жыл бұрын
It does?
@markjulianvillamarin7923 Жыл бұрын
And then he sacrifices THE ROOOOOOK
@caleblebaron11795 ай бұрын
4:40 napoleon had no power in 1820.
@staroc2258 Жыл бұрын
Bruh Napoléon wasn't stalin
@plugshirt1762 Жыл бұрын
According to the English he might as well be. Two hundred year propaganda still in action lol
@veretxnerd983 Жыл бұрын
Yo 2:19 I did the exact same tactic a few games ago and got this in my recommended
@ba2138 Жыл бұрын
Crazy bro, this move is so rare
@nekopop8159 Жыл бұрын
On Qh4, black could just use the pawn to block and threaten the queen.
@zzdanibombzz6774 Жыл бұрын
how do we know games of napoleon
@bongcloudmaster5462 Жыл бұрын
They were documented
@herobrinegreek9493 Жыл бұрын
THE ROOOOK
@santhaprabhu45387 ай бұрын
I have played with this opening Kings pawn opening : Napoleon attack And i won every time i used it
@anglo-deutsche-egyptian7831 Жыл бұрын
Wait a minute, at 5:00 why didn't he just move the second Bishop to G5 then he would have checkmated the king with no escape?????!!
@NewpLiet Жыл бұрын
bishop and knight can block
@bhushannikode5086 Жыл бұрын
He literally sacrifice everything for winning
@datiwai Жыл бұрын
How u know napoleon games?
@gaberobison6804 ай бұрын
This isn't an opening as it relies on the opponent blundering on move 3
@Ducky_Lord Жыл бұрын
y is rick ashley advertising napolean playing chess?
@ImaNPCman Жыл бұрын
I would rate that game at about a 650.
@schmeetsonbeetson7168 Жыл бұрын
How did peole even record his random chess game??
@gwennblei Жыл бұрын
There are many many games in history that were written down to be studied later. In some tournaments it was mandatory to write down moves. Also historically, many games were played by mail. You'd send a letter to the other person and add your move inside the letter, these games could last many months. And others, like this one, where just recorded cause the players were famous
@BilberryBogwonAGD Жыл бұрын
The usual method was just a slip of paper with the moves written down
@Ethan-mz4kv Жыл бұрын
It was played in 1820, a year before his death in St. Helena. Napoleon was watched over by hundreds of British Guards and had his own members of his entourage visit him such as General Bertrand in this instance. During his captivity anything he did was recorded and watched.
@maxcarren112 Жыл бұрын
Napoleon was always the type of general to trade a bigger army for a faster army. Makes sense why he would prefer to play a game with a lot of pawns sacrificed, they get in the way.
@Teakbumblbee Жыл бұрын
Moment of silence who thought this was real
@pedrojuan8050 Жыл бұрын
Napoleon walked so Mikhail Tal could run.
@p3ace_W4s_n3vEr_4n_0pTIoN Жыл бұрын
Sry chief, ur head wouldn't be off if you were to beat Napoleon in 1820 because he was exiled and dethroned
@andreasm5770 Жыл бұрын
What a creative comments section
@joaquinbartsch4325 Жыл бұрын
love your content, very funny comentating, and good analysis con the games, and where did you get those games from napoleon, are they written on paper??? and the neck bit, i love it
@Creativechessyoda Жыл бұрын
Where's Waldo?
@brandonjeffries3638 Жыл бұрын
All that was a opening....?
@vidhroh1538 Жыл бұрын
2:09 Whh not queen H5 instead of this pawn move?? Could have won a bishop🤦🤦
@abdallaking2842 Жыл бұрын
queen e2
@laurensgorter Жыл бұрын
Black plays queen E7 protecting both the checkmate and the green tiled bishop of black
@bingshologins3780 Жыл бұрын
Unexpected
@af2547 Жыл бұрын
Wait… this is my opening.
@taylorbeckett9686 Жыл бұрын
When I first started chess I did those exact same first 2-3 moves as well
@niallbuckley22 Жыл бұрын
Deadly Game ... shame about the street players in Tirana NY and everywhere else
@huzaifa8665 Жыл бұрын
Is that an opening?
@evilotis01 Жыл бұрын
and everything was going great until move 8, at which point Napoleon decided to invade Russia
@thethorbynator2197 Жыл бұрын
Is OttoMeister German?
@note5068 Жыл бұрын
Napolean is alpha zero huh
@thefingerling167 Жыл бұрын
wtf is wrong with u guys in the comments its a goddamn youtube video you dont need to fact check it
@plugshirt1762 Жыл бұрын
Then don’t say false facts in the video lol it’s not that complex
@beetoq2625 Жыл бұрын
Napoleon could have been a great general, he was not a great chess player
@plugshirt1762 Жыл бұрын
Yeah he was a great general but but chess has evolved so much over the years that games back the aren’t comparable to ones now
@misterkoneko2389 Жыл бұрын
Poggers 🔥
@normalweirdo4175 Жыл бұрын
For God so loved the world that he gave his only son so that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. John 3:16
@quixotes4478 Жыл бұрын
take your normal pills
@skyduster1190 Жыл бұрын
damn high level chess
@timmiecalais4824 Жыл бұрын
How to get views
@2amjan Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the big, red arrow so I know who Napoleon is
@Justpassingby204 Жыл бұрын
This comment seems familiar
@2amjan Жыл бұрын
@@Justpassingby204 rosentreter gambit
@MesserTAMU Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the big red arrow so I know who Napoleon is.
@gagnoli447 Жыл бұрын
@@MesserTAMU what if the Napoleon is the friends that we made along the way?
@reginaldstoic Жыл бұрын
The Bonapart has found it's new host.
@GeorgeNasseem Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the big, red arrow so I know who Napoleon is
@bonkscout3108 Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the big, red arrow so I know who Napoleon is