Neal Adams - Science: 12 - The great Lakes

Neal Adams Science - Conspiracy:
The great Lakes are evidence, Earth is growing
Watch the full Neal Adams - Science Playlist: • Neal Adams - Science
Neal Adams Science:
This video is a Neal Adams animation about his theory that the Earth is growing. This collides with the Pangea theory. Watch it, you will be amazed.
For all videos, please go to:
nealadams.com/index.php/science
Download the Crustal Age Map and more at:
continuitystudios.net/growth/
To purchase the full DVD with extra footage unavailable elsewhere, visit:
www.nealadamsstore.com/Science...

[@fixedguitar47]

I still don’t understand why someone watching this yells “CONSPIRACY THEORY!” I look at this and it makes beautiful sense to me. It’s clear as day, sublime, perfect. Yet I show this to people and they won’t accept it cause it’s not what they were taught growing up.

[@nealadamsdotcom]

Don't concern yourself. It's always been this way! And when the change comes, those same people will say,..."I always suspected it was like that!" It's human nature!

[@johndurrett3573]

@@nealadamsdotcom Rest in Peace Neal. You did the world a service with these videos. I hope in my lifetime to hear your thoughts and presentations validated!

[@eyeOOsee]

Ohhh, Neal, you're not kidding! And to back up the work you've done so far, I would like to add this : I went to the Great Lakes website and surfed it and the links, and I found something priceless. It was a sonographic diagram of the lake's beds. Neal! They are V shaped from top surface to the bottom! That matches your explantion PERFECTLY!!! As the surface opened up and pulled away, it cut into it like a letter V. I had always thought the lake beds were flat. They're not!! You are right!!

[@RickOsmonICTV]

Lake Superior is a rift. The rift nature is why the geology is (or was before mining) rich in extreme high purity metal ores. Copper of 99.9% purity, iron approaching 90% all are matters of history. A rift forms from continents ripping apart. I am convinced Neal is correct. By the way, Neal, hope to see you at MegaCon.

[@charlesmccoy3519]

This makes more sense than what is taught by the academia.

[@michaelnew1962]

What a great presentation.

[@rustyscrapper]

They say Africa is eventually going to split apart but looking at Neal's awesome maps would indicate that canada is Well on its way of breaking off more pieces. Quebec always said they wanted to seperate from Canada. Looks like they are literally doing it already.

[@IAm010110]

I am really glad i found your work. This is really helping me piece things together. For myself, anyways.

[@a31ford]

This is the stuff that needs to be told, plain and simple... TYT Neal !

[@nealadamsdotcom]

Alaska was attached to California before North America pulled away from Asia and the Australian plate. It rolled upward during the pull-away. This is why the west coast is sliding upward. It's called a Slip fault.

[@carolselfridge5925]

If they're glacier made they should be parallel to one another, shouldn't they? Also there should be pushed up land at the southern tips and they should be broader at the north , shouldn't they be?

[@1walicki]

PBS just uploaded a story about Lake Michigan's water levels dropping 2' per year. They cite environmental decreases in rainfall & evaporation, but can't conclude why the water is essentially getting warmer. After re-watching your video (which is awesome!!!) I'm inclined to ask the question ..might the lake water being sucked into the mantel and being redistributed... Dutchsinse keeps updating on the Louisiana sinkhole. Your thoughts? Also, Please extend your models into the future!!! :-)

[@eyeOOsee]

Aaaaahhhhh......how refreshing..... Neal, I had to come back to watch your videos over and over again. I had been watching some earthquake videos here on youtube, and about went nuts with the geologists talking about the continents slaming into eachother!! And those people are considered the professionals.....omg. Thankyou Neal!!

[@B00Tsauce]

Because a professional in the field should always be disregarded over armchair science. *facepalm*. War on information is real.

[@eyeOOsee]

Trevor L. Mercer What the "professionals" have is a theory. What Neal has is a theory. And Neal's theory makes a hell of a lot more sense than the "professional's" theory. Because a "professional" does not always have all the facts or all the truth, or the whole of the subject. (Believe me, I'm in the medical field where superstition dictates so much of what people think and do) And in this case, I'll go with what makes the most sense. Whether it's taught in these Hoity Toity "schools" or not, isn't the last word on the subject. All "schools" indoctrinate students to conform the way the system wants students to conform. There also ARE "professionals" who agree with Neal and teach it that way, too. Open minded students are the future's best hope. You have to admit, Neal's videos and rational sure make a hell of a lot more sense than what geologists are taught in schools. Unless one's ego won't go here........

[@B00Tsauce]

@@eyeOOsee makes sense to an armchair scientist with a high school (or less) level understanding of science. To the educated, not so much. You may be in the medical field but that doesn’t mean you are an educated geologist. Would you seek your dentist for cancer treatment? Why not? Aren’t they educated?

[@freddyeddyr]

Hey @nealadamsdotcom, are there any geological feature that link together the rifts of the Yosemite valley or the Grand Canyon? These were said to be caused only by glacial movements and erosion from glacial meltdowns, but they look like great escarpment/rift.

[@nealadamsdotcom]

Big debate on these features, cause the Grand canyon meanders. BUT it could be a pull apart that is affected by rushing water as sea level dropped. I think you can count out Glacial movements.

[@wmike82]

Neal, there is other data to support the growing theory. In Hawaii they have been sampling magnetic fields in lava rocks (as captured in the ferrite). They are 'suggesting' a pole flip - which is ridiculous - as fields captured in the ferrite 700000 years ago is differently pole oriented from today. And flips faster and faster as you go back further in time. This suggests movement in the land from north to south pole orientation. However, consider 'all' growing bodies 'mature' in size.

[@chadgooden5259]

I got to tell you. I wanted to give you shit. But the more I watch these vid and explore this idea, the more I think you got it right. If you are proven correct... Wow, just wow. Everything changes.

[@craigseamus4335]

i told all my friends about the great lakes and the growing earth. and they were like Whoa!

[@nealadamsdotcom]

Ah, but then, they'll say you're nuts. Blindness continues to exist even if an animation AGREES with the spreading of Geology's PANGEA Theory. Blindness is all-encompassing.

[@craigseamus4335]

jreed136 who knows but its fassinating as fukk and it appeals to rny sense of whirnsy and wonder it totally sparks the irnagination and thats what life is all about POSSIBILITIES

[@craigseamus4335]

jreed136 You should try it for me

[@craigseamus4335]

jreed136 I think it does this is sorne good shit the irnplikations are rnind blowing astounding and wonderful people first rejekted the rnere ideas of the kontinents shifting kause ssientists are kunts ssientists are the rnost resistant fukks on the planets to new ideas bekause it upsets their apple karts and their prestige and their ego and their MONEY if you all by yourself hawe korne to the konklusions that you feel are best for you then good for you but ssiense or so kalled established ssiense is nothing rnore than a bunsh of annoying guys interested in job sekurity

[@nealadamsdotcom]

The question of "How it's made." is NOT the point. I am not Steven Speilberg. The question is did this happen? What are the clues? FIRST, according to accepted theory (Pangea Theory) did North America PULL AWAY from Europe? To this, the answer is YES! What were the consequences of this pulling away? Well, does it make sense that there was a clean BREAK from top to bottom,...OR, was there tugging and spreading and stretching apart before the final seperation? And if there was this process, what would it LOOK LIKE??? Well, it would look exactly like the Great Lakes!,...in which, if you push the sides back together ,...they fit perfectly! Glaciers? DO-NOT-"DIG" then GO! That would be "Nonsense Science"

[@niginit]

Have you ever considered a documentary? Going to speak with some geologists- present them with the hypothesis and listen to their response. Then you get a chance to discuss it. Of course you're defying years of science and new science, but that is literally what science is all about. Scientists pride themselves on being challenged and proven wrong. They learn something new, viola. I really enjoyed your interview on the radio. I think you're charming and incite curiosity. How about it?

[@wmike82]

I also want to note, our 'solar system' grew as well (to it's maturation size - now). From this, I can go on, using 'new' data recovered from comets about how water forms on them to go into detail about how life came to be on Earth even! Mars is a factor in this (the lack of magnetic field - shorted on Earth when it hit Earth to break off the moon). Later, the moon struck Earth. I'm limited in characters here. Let's talk? I can list reference data. Electric Universe also plays a role...

[@symbolsandsystems]

Has anyone calculated the rate of sea bed travel/expansion from the rifts against the places of theorized subduction to see if the age of the sea floor matches the rate of expansion?

[@B00Tsauce]

We have sensors all over the planet tracking plate movements. This in itself proves plate tectonics but hey this is amateur hour, so y’a, reality is fiction.

[@jennabrutegrrl9525]

If what you assert is true then the entirety of northern Canada should be rife with graben and half-graben fault basins that formed during the last ~200 Ma. What mapping have you performed throughout that region to investigate this?

[@santiagozerbino5822]

Whats the reason for Earth growth?

[@0U8123MTA3]

It is known that neutrinos can pass completely through Earth while muons do not. We honestly do not know how many undetected particles enter Earth and never leave. I suspect that the slow growth is from a regular stream of tiny particles and any fast growth is from a flash flood of these particles emanating from some kind of energy burst. The direction of the flash floods of particles determines which portion of the sphere grows the most compared to slower growing portions. Fast growth periods are the source of major volcanic and earthquake activity. That is the best answer I have.

[@B00Tsauce]

@@0U8123MTA3 any source material? Peer reviewed? Didn’t think so....

[@nealadamsdotcom]

That's what they taught you in school, yes? The fact that all their edges fot together perfectly is a coincidence, right? NO they rifted apart.

[@GeorgeAlexanderOz]

Neal, expanding on this video, do you see any credibility in the various predictions about the break-up of the North American continent (Cayce, Scallion, Navy Map etc.)? My imagination is wild enough to see a possible relation. There seems to be two energy vectors, one to north-west, one to north-east that could tear the USA apart in the middle. How fast might that happen? Is it a matter of thousands of years, or can the happen in a few weeks?

[@jdearing46]

to those who doubt findings like these look up the end of physics as wr know it. you may be suprised by what you find. it seems tje scientists have run into a problem concerning black holes and are rushing to come up with yet another theory to fix it.

[@nealadamsdotcom]

There is lots of Geological proof. It's all there for people who want to look. Then there's common sense. My job is to show the common sense, in order for the TRUTH to come out.

[@M.ANTHONY_G]

Im not laughing... but i need more evidence before a believe this theory... it sounds very true and possible though...

[@ipanonymously9503]

Wow! Looks like a AI BOT took over Neil's comments in an attempt to discredit the pattern of an expanding earth. Fun technology we have here!

[@EPSTomcat11]

Then why aren't the Great Lakes filled with salt water? Or any large inland lakes in the world?

[@nealadamsdotcom]

Salt is not a natural constituant of water. Rifting apart continents crack and break into salt domes within the sediments and polute the ocean water with salt!

[@EPSTomcat11]

+nealadamsdotcom Right- hence my question...

[@nealadamsdotcom]

Salt domes aren't everywhere. BUT,..if you have water that doesn't flow with the oceanic current, if there was a break-in to a dome,.without a current the salt would settle to the bottom and sediment over.

[@reapermanslayer]

I don't know if you heard but there is a whole lot of salt under Lake Erie.....not sure about the rest, but there is why you have most of your Morton Salt.

[@destinyairsofter5094]

Not truly 100% correct if you go up there the glaciers did fill the lakes and carved it out a bit but the water used to flow to mn and superior but mn became volcanic and raised up before the river was just a creek

[@nealadamsdotcom]

+Destiny Airsofter Glaciers don't "CARVE" ! If they magically "CARVE", they'd have to "SCOOP" and "CARRY" overland,....to another place "JUST AS BIG"! That is just,....nonsense,....no matter who came up with such a silly theory!

[@nealadamsdotcom]

Look, If you are going to be a stupid internet troll, go elsewhere. We know where all continental plate is. We have perfect scans, x-ray. Seismic, magnetic reversals, and cores and dredging!

[@nealadamsdotcom]

You don't understand. Factual proof for Pangea SIMPLY DOESN'T exist. it's all theory and gas! None of it has proof at all. Here's a small example. The LIGHT Granitic crust differentiated upward from heavier magmic material. to, MOLTEN, coat the Earth with a NEW lighter crust then COOL in layer after layer. It had to cover the whole Earth,....and Granitic rock CAN'T subduct beneath the oceanic plate. So, here was the Earth's crust. NOW, that crust covers only ONE THIRD of the Earth.

[@nealadamsdotcom]

Not expansion! Growth. Go to continentalstudiosdotnetslashgrowth

[@FinflazodeTurroai]

Hello, Adams ! Still peddling the same old same old snake oil?. Have a nice day and may you find happiness.

[@nealadamsdotcom]

Instead of a smarmy comment, why don't you tell us why the deep ocean basalt bottom is no older than 200 million years old anywhere in the world, while the continental plates are BILLIONS OF YEARS OLD???? Hmmmm?

[@FinflazodeTurroai]

@@nealadamsdotcom I answered that question years ago. Look it up, man. MANY years ago. Your persistence is astounding. My best regards, and keep up with the good work. There's one born every minute, you know.

[@nealadamsdotcom]

Yes, there's a sucker born every minute and they all inhabit our classes of Geology in the world. Too bad they don't co-habit the same space as Physicists. Perhaps some real work could be done!@@FinflazodeTurroai

[@FinflazodeTurroai]

@@nealadamsdotcom Good morning, Neal !. Be careful with that virus that's running amok. May you be wearing a mask when one tries to get you. Funny that I love Geology and Physics. I must be experiencing some real soul-wrenching conflict, then, wouldn't I ?. But do not take my word for this, go and study Physics AND Geology. They go hand in hand, I tell you. And BOTH denounce your expanding Earth theory. But, what is a little expanding Planet between friends?. Like nothing. Less than nothing. Have a nice day. It is GOOD to be alive...still.

[@nealadamsdotcom]

Pair-Production gives us all the Electrons of the UNIVERSE!.......Which constitutes more than ONE THIRD of the Particles of the UNIVERSE! The REST of the matter is made of PAIRS!

[@johndenielmoriones7107]

Canada and Greenland 🇨🇦🇬🇱

[@nealadamsdotcom]

Clemente de la Cuadra nealadamsdotcom Good morning, Neal !. Be careful with that virus that's running amok. May you be wearing a mask when one tries to get you. I have published several videos on the science of covid 19 on the tube! Check them out!. Funny that I love Geology and Physics. I'd say you don't love them enough! I must be experiencing some real soul-wrenching conflict, then, wouldn't I ?. But do not take my word for this, go and study Physics AND Geology. They go hand in hand, I tell you. And BOTH denounce your expanding Earth theory. FIRST, IT'S NOT MINE, AND SECOND IT;S NOT "EXPANDING" EARTH! NOTHING IN SCIENCE REALLY EXPANDS, WITHOUT ANOTHER FORCE BEING ADDED,....LIKE, THERMAL, OR CHEMICAL, A ROCK DOESN'T "EXPAND" NOTHING EXPANDS! THE THEORY IS CALLED "GROWING EARTH, GROWING UNIVERSE". BECAUSE THE UNIVERSE CANNOT AND DOES NOT "EXPAND!" AN INCREDIBLY STUPID THEORY, AMONG MANY.! "OH, I GOT IT, NOTHING IN THE UNIVERSE EXPANDS,.....ONE EXCEPTION,.....UM,... THE UNIVERSE!!!! WHAT? THAT'S THE EXCEPTION?THE UNIVERSE???? THE LUNATICS ARE IN CHARGE OF THE LOONEY BIN. But, what is a little GROWING Planet between friends?. LET ME TELL YOU HOW SCIENCE WORKS!........MANKIND AND IT'S SCIENCE KNEW NOTHING, BUT HAD BELIEFS THAT THEY BELIEVD BASED ON OBSERVATION AND THE THOUGHTS OF OUR SMARTET MEM. THEN ONE DAY A SINGLE MAN, (OR WOMAN) SAYS "I THINK I HAVE PROVED THAT WE HAVE ALWAYS BEEN WRONG ABOUT THIS, AND INSTEAD, "THIS" IS THE FACT!!! ALL OF "SCIENCE" DISAGREES, AND REVOLTS AGAINST THIS SAD IDIOT. THEN ANOTHER AGREES ,HEN ANOTHER AND ONE DAY WE HAVE 'NEW SCIENCE! THIS ISN'T A FLUKE! IT HAPPENS THIS WAY EVERY SINGLE TIME! IF YOU CHOSE 7 RANDOM PIECES OF A PUZZLE AND TRIED TO FIT THEM TOGETHER, YOU COULD NEVER DO IT! I HAVE TAKEN THE 7 CONTINENTS AND PUT THEM TOGETHER TO COMPLETELY COVER A PLANET THE SIZE OF TODAY'S MARS THE PIECES COMPLETELY COVER THE PLANET PERFECTLY! IF THEY WEREN'T THAT WAY IN THE PAST, THAT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE!!!! DID YOU WATCH THE VIDEO CAREFULLY. I AM A WELL-KNOWN ARTIST. I MAKE MISTAKES, BECAUSE I AM HUMAN,....BUT THIS, CONENETAL COATING FITS PERFECTLY AND BECOMES ONE COMPLETE GRANITIC COVERING OF OUR SMALLER PLANET! THERE IS NO 200 MILLION YEAR OLD OCEANIC PLATE AND ONLY BILLIONS OF YEARS OLD GRANITIC CONTINENTAL PLATE! THE PROOFS ARE EVERYWHERE AND THEY ARE MULTITUDE!. SO, BECAUSE I AM A COMIC BOOK ARTIST-WRITER-PUBLISHER. HOW DARE I TO EVEN IMPLY I MAY HAVE FIGURED ALLL THAT SCIENCE HASN'T DISCOVERED! IS THAT IT? TO MAKE YOU FEEL BETTER ABOUT THIS, LET ME GIVE YOU A LIST! 1. "SCIENTISTS ARE SUBJECT TO BEING FIRED LOSING TENURE, BEING EMBARRASSED BY FELLOW SCIENTS. I HAVE NO SUCH CONSTRAINTS. I HAVE THE BEST COMPUTERS, I DESIGNED MY OWN ANIMATION PROGRAME TO DO THIS WORK, WHICH HASN'T BEEN EQUALLED AFTER 110 YEARS! MANY HAVE TRIED. I AM SELF-EMPLOYED AND I OWN MY OWN COMPANY! I AM NOT SUBJECT TO SENURE OR LOSS OF A JOB FOR RADICAL THEORIZING, I DON'T CARE WHAT OTHERS THINK, AND I, MOST LIKELY COULD HIRE THEM IF THEY GET FIRED! AS LOU COSTELLO SANG IN JACK AND THE BEANSTALK, "I FEAR NOTHING WHEN I AM IN THE RIGHT, WHOEVER PUSHES ME AROUND WILL FIND ME FULL OF FIGHT. TUM-TIDDLE-DE TUM TUM." 2. IN INTREGATING SCIENCE WITH ART I HAVE DESIGNED NEW CONCEPT AMUSEMENT PARK RIDS, LIKE THE TERMINATOR T23-D RIDE AND THE SPIDERMAN RIDE AND OTHER , INCLUDING 7 RIDES FOR INDONESIA! 3, I MOUNTED A BATTEL WITH THE TWO BIG COMIC COMPANIES FOR RETURN OF ORIGINAL ART, BETTER RATES, ROYALTIES AND GREATER PRODUCTION QUALITY!.....AND WON EVERY FIGHT! I CHANGED THE ADVERTISING INDUSTRY BY CHANGING ALL PRE-PRODUCTION ANIMATICS FROM FILM TO COMPUTERS! 3. I FOUGHT FOR AND WON RIGHTS AND FUTURE INCOME FOR THE CREATORS OF SUPERMAN, WHO WERE LIVING IN NEAR POVERTY! 4. OH, THERE'S A VERY LOT MORE,....BUT THE LATEST IS A 2 HOUR VIDEO PROVING THE EXISTENCE OF SASQUATCH, DOGMEN AND OTHER CRYPIDS! Like nothing. Less than nothing. Have a nice day. It is GOOD to be alive...still. MY FAMILY AND EMPLOYEES ARE COVID FREE AND GOING SOON FOR OUR SECOND SHOT. GOOD LUCK TO YOU AND KEEP YOUR ATTENTION ON MUTANT STRAINS!

[@M.ANTHONY_G]

yes but Neal... in this video you are not showing proof of any kind. As zzzdogutube posted, all you have is a neat animation which anyone can do to make it look believeable..... you need to support this with proof....Sure it sounds sensable... but so does the glacial theory too.

[@jiiig8667]

This guy is living in a comic book.

[@B00Tsauce]

Makes sense to anyone who doesn’t study glaciation and just looks at a map. Makes less sense when you pursue a career in geology and find all the physical evidence to the contrary. I have literally been to every single location you pointed at and studied the local geology and we literally have mountains of evidence. But playing with maps is fun. Thinking your “on to something” is exciting. Hate to burst your bubble. Why are there significantly more lakes above the 49th parallel? Glacier. Why can we find moraines in predictable locations. Glacier. Why can we find scoring on rocks in the Laurentian plateau that are carbon dated 4600 million years old. Glacier. Get your ground game before talking. You clearly are an armchair scientist with enough knowledge to technobabble the gullible. Disappointing.

[@nealadamsdotcom]

Trevor L. Mercer MY RESPONSES IN CAPS! Makes sense to anyone who doesn’t study glaciation and just looks at a map. Makes less sense when you pursue a career in geology and find all the physical evidence to the contrary. NOT AT ALL. CLEARLY, YOU ARE SPEAKING FROM YOUR EMOTIONAL OUTRAGE, AND NO SCIENCE AT ALL!!! EVEN THE PANGEA THEORY INTICATES RIFTING AND SPREADING OF THE CONTINENTAL PLATES! SO, WHAT THE HECK ARE YOU OBJECTING TO??? I have literally been to every single location you pointed at and studied the local geology and we literally have mountains of evidence. EVIENCE OF WHAT, EXACTLY,....TGAT THE PANGEA THEORY IS CORRECT???? YOU, SIR ARE MERELY SHOOTING OFF YOUR MOUTH WITHOUT MAKING A POINT!!! But playing with maps "PLAYING" WITH MAPS"? ??is fun. IT'S "FUN"? IS IT? I WOULDN'T KNOW? TELL ME,..EXACTLY WHAT KIND OF "FUN" ARE YOU SPEAKING OF? I'M CURIOUS! Thinking your ( THIS WORD IS YOU'RE.) “on to something” is exciting. Hate to burst your bubble. GIVE IT A TRY, MY FRIEND. Why are there significantly more lakes above the 49th parallel? Glacier. WHAT DOES THIS HAVE TO DO WITH ANYTHING? THOSE LAKES ARE A RESULT OF GLACIERS AND THE STRETCHING OF THE CONTINENTAL PLATES. (COURSE, YOU'D HAVE TO LOOK THIS UP.) Why can we find moraines in predictable locations. GLACIERS! Glacier. RIGHT! Why can we find scoring on rocks in the Laurentian plateau that are carbon dated 4600 million years old. 4,600 MILLION YEARS AGO IS 4,6 BILLION YEARS AGO! DO YOU KNOW THAT,.....JUST ABOUT THE TIME EARTH WAS CREATED!!!!! GLACIERS???? YOU'RE AN IDIOT,....SIR. Glacier. Get your ground game before talking. You clearly are an armchair scientist ALL ARMCHAIR SCIENTISTS ARE ARMCHAIR SCIENTISTS! IT'S A WAY WE COMMUNICATE! with enough knowledge to technobabble the gullible. Disappointing. COME BACK WHEN YOU HAVE SOMETHING PERTINENT TO SAY!

[@nealadamsdotcom]

Stream Neal in brackets This was good for a laugh. JUST a SECOND!!! Your incredibly stupid Pangea Theory has continents pulling apart and spreading in many areas. Why is this so strange to you. Explain the pulling upward and East of the Eastern side of the Hudson river ??? ) A completely ridiculous theory! ( Oh? and a fairy tale of Glaciers DIGGING massive troughs so vast and deep as to beggar the ' imagination is not preposterous??? What did they use? God's steam shovel??? Why didn't Glaciers dig massive lakes all around the northern continental plate????) To set the record straight - (You have GOT to be kidding!) the Earth is NOT growing and ( and we know this, because we understand, that god, in his infinite wisdom differentiated lighter Granitic rock to coat the Earth's surface,...but CHOSE to coat ONLY ONE THIRD OF THE EARTH , in jiigsaw puzzle pieces! ) the Great Lakes were scoured by glaciers and filled with glacial meltwater. Stupid as a tree. Did you ever SEE the Great Lakes????

[@will_of_europa]

Lol you sound like you are trolling your own video cause I can't make out if you are for or against anything typed here lol. Growing Earth model a no go?

[@niginit]

Online evolutionist? That's laughable in itself. Keep evolution out of your mouth. You are clearly not qualified to speak on it. However, this is an interesting theory, which has before had time in the public view and might again. The physical evidence, if true, would be undeniable. Let's think of funding perhaps even going and discussing the theory with professionals. Even if they are embittered with plate tectonics, they will still talk about it. After all, it's a scientific question.