Top 10 D&D 3.5e Monsters I Want in D&D 5e | Nerd Immersion

[@orgixvi3]

Shadow Dragons ARE in the 5e MM, they're a template applied to the normal dragons, same with Dracolich.

[@marcperez2598]

The Template isnt the clearest thing in the world for many DM's though. You get the Young Red Shadow Dragon sure, but then many DM's are likely to not see it as a Template at first. Overall it could be clearer I guess it what im saying

[@orgixvi3]

I'm not sure how much clearer it could be. I can see how you could miss it by skimming, but if you stop to read it the description clearly says how to apply it and what it gets.

[@melvixen1943]

I even allowed one of my players to add that template to theyr Dragonborn. Just gave them nekro resis and breath. It did fit well since they chose shadow sorcerer.

[@MoonbornUwU]

Man, I’ve homebrewed some crazy history to my home made world involving an ancient shadow dragon. The shadow dragon is like the end all and enemy to all in it. I just wish they did more with different types of shadow dragons.. maybe a magically tainted lightning breath that animates the dead? Or for green dragons poison breath to exhume a shadowy noxious mist that eats at you and with some form of crowd control effect to it? I may be a bit of a shadow dragon fan..

[@Pointandlaughh]

I get the feeling that he just kind of skimmed over most of what he talked about.

[@acemoz]

I love this video concept where you talk about the old editions.

[@dylanboczar999]

Loving the ever-increasing bizarrity of the intro transitions

[@Spiceodog]

this one was a scp reference

[@alexanderjoshbustamante3203]

@@Spiceodog here be the dragons

[@migueldelmazo5244]

Great video. Could there be a Dire Ranger? You know, a ranger tough enough to be worth playing?

[@NerdImmersion]

Nice one

[@stugod5000]

Actually a dire themed class could be kinda cool like a mixture of barbarian and druid especially for the 2019 ranger ua

[@chifuyuko]

There needs to be a Dire Rhea!!!!!

[@flareinc7413]

Holy sh... Those Siege Crabs are badass. :O Thanks for making this video.

[@flareinc7413]

Oh and hell yes to the Dire animals and Weird Dragons. I love rayfish and I want my Dire stingray!

[@braindead5283]

Late as always, I'd like to add that in addition to "Dire" versions of animals, 3.5e has "legendary" versions, said to be the ultimate and perfect version of any given animal, and If I remember correctly, only one of each animal exists at any given time.

[@zewwy]

Love cool monsters, and that siege crab is now definitely something I'm gonna use

[@johnhall8046]

Sevrin Kristiansen Hjemdahl “My wizard casts •cone of melted butter• using an 8th level spell slot!” 😜

[@stugod5000]

Seige crab. Seige crab.... Look like crab. Ready to seige

[@EnnuiElpis]

The dire animals are in 5th edition. They’re just called “giant” instead. There’s even an increased size version for a few of them, like I’m pretty sure there’s a hulking crab in one of the adventures (Tales from the Yawning Portal, I think). As for the Dire Bear, if they were going to do that I would want them to just make stats for a few of the extinct species of bear that are bigger than the Polar Bear, like the Short-Faced Bear and I think there was one even bigger than that.

[@kylethomas9130]

Yeah, thought it was weird when I first realized Wolf didn't have a Giant variant. Druids that focus on Conjuration or Wild Shape seem to do okay, since most encounters favor their low level power scaling.

[@CONTINGENCY_sys]

Short faced bear absolutely. In my homebrew direanimals have advanced hides and physical adaptations to harsh world environments. My direbear have unique horn/spike structures that adorn their form. fun stuff.

[@ZacTheLit]

There were giant animals in earlier editions too tho so clearly that’s something else

[@Luke-wt8dg]

There's a Tumblr (ThirdtoFifth) that updates 3e and 3.5e monsters to 5e, but I'd love even more of those monsters updated for modern usage! Great video :)

[@alexfikar7757]

I too love the look backs to old editions. Especially as someone who has only been exposed to 5e

[@anthonystromeyer1399]

I DMed 2E for decades after it was surpassed. Now I'm OSR/homebrew.

[@adrianjuarez1162]

Alex Fikar would love to see the sign crab dire animals and the draconomicon come to 5e!

[@ADT1995]

I started with 5e but have some experience with Pathfinder 1e as well. I DM 5e, but I have a lot of 3.5 in my 5e.... Especially with items and monsters (3.5 had recommended costs for every item, very helpful, and had a lot of guidelines for making custom items)

[@evehellod9776]

I feel like most 5e monsters don’t have anything special about them like many 3.5e monsters do. It’s mostly just attacks in 5e, whilst 3.5e have things like the bone drinker, then the siege crab like in the video, where they’re much more than just a creature with normal attacks

[@chrispoznich]

I think a dragon resource book would be great and I’d personally love to see a circle of dragons Druid or something along those lines with a modified use for the wild shapes ability that allows you to turn into a drake/half dragon/etc

[@anthonystromeyer1399]

2e had halfdragons and a sweet complete druid's handbook

[@jugujugu1]

A dragon source book would be amazing. With new dragons, new templates, spellcasting dragons, dragon NPCs, and dragon themed subclasses for each class (like the draconic sorcerer but actually good)

[@stugod5000]

@@jugujugu1 maybe more dragon themed items like armour and a dragon holy avenger... Dragon artificer would just be a power ranger

[@charlottewalnut3118]

Christopher Poznich I’m just gonna say that all those things with wings and only two legs are actually wyverns Not drakes

[@FruitH.]

on dnd beyond there’s a circle of dragons druid subclass that someone made as homebrew that isn’t too bad. Your options for wild shape are really limited early on, so something like a draconomicon would just be perfect to add on to what’s missing.

[@drewforchic9083]

On DMsGuild, Conner McCall went and basically adapted the Draconomicon to 5th edition. It's called The Book Of Dragons for 5th Edition. I bought it a while ago and it's well worth the price if you like dragons and want to make better use of them, and it also has 5e stats for drakes and most everything else the Draconomicon had. Actually, there's so much Dragon stuff from previous editions, he had to make two books (most of the planar dragons are in the second one). Ted, you should totally review them for this channel, if you haven't already.

[@idkuwuiguess23]

I want them to make a draconomicon, but also appeal to the 5e player base in that it could bring in the new draconic subclasses in the beginning of the book

[@saltykrug]

You read my mind from back in January!!! I was telling the friend that got me back into D&D that they really are screwing up by not having a book solely on dragons. I figured that dragon lore had evolved and included so many different types. I was wrong. We were working a job away from home in Indiana and he went to a used book store. He found and bought me the Dragonomicon from 3.5e. I love that book and use it to flesh out dragons for battles with my two son's party. I don't pull stats but will be home brew converting many things from that book. Sounds like a busy weekend with a new set of ink cartridges, the PC and a stack of the finest printing paper so I can make my own 5e version of that book. I really feel like the ball is being dropped by some pure laziness as far as monster books not being released. The monsters we kill if played or used properly is where the magic of the game comes from. I'm really shocked by the lack of a visual description of the creatures in many of the monster's stat page.

[@ethanpeterson5640]

Damn, I'm actually here super early. I want that Ethereal Marauder and the Lifeleech Otyugh!

[@refinedbrass]

Holy crap those shocker lizards would be a scary encounter if you had to cross pass a jungle with like 200 of them in a mating frenzy

[@karpmageddon4155]

Dungeon Dad did a 5e conversion of them if you'd like to check it out.

[@refinedbrass]

@@karpmageddon4155 thanks i will check out i thought of something even more scary what if these lizards are attracted to strings of will-o-wisps for the electric glowing field they have around them and mate in swamps where wisps live and the wisps seek out groups of lizards so it can lure people to them so they can get stunned and they can harvest the despair and fear emotions of the prey

[@sharksuperiority9736]

“Wizards of the coast knew what people wanted and gave them dragons” Is a funny line because it lets you imagine that dragons was not what they wanted, and Wizards of the coast just gave them dragons anyways And we have giant versions of normal animals, which are basically just dire versions HEY WAIT. I had a book published by wizards of the coast called “Guide to dragons”, before I got into dnd I just thought that it was just a cool book about dragons. But now I know that is had a bunch of the old 3.5 dragons in it, and was based on 3.5 dnd

[@stanleyschlosser7495]

wait if thay dont want dragons does that mean thay what dung yiep getta die mind outa the gutter

[@sharksuperiority9736]

Stanley Schlosser. What... The fuck

[@karpmageddon4155]

You could say we're in dire need of #1. 👀

[@jaythomas172]

If you played morrowwind in might remember one of the dunmer cities was built inside the shell of a deceased emperor crab. Yes I said a city, a decently sized one.

[@kylethomas9130]

I thought I had seen it all, then I realized a few houses were more than a story tall.

[@scottburns4458]

I’m here for the intros but stay for the awesome content Loving the look back at what should be brought forward

[@johnquiett1085]

Drakes basically replaced the big cats in my home brew campaign because we had Tabaxi and another home brew race that was more Lion based. Dragon Magazine had an article with my favorite dragon that brewed moonshine as it's breath weapon. They spit the alcohol at you and you might go blind with a very low save, but you probably were vulnerable to fire for a few rounds after you got sprayed. Half lungs rode them in my world and tossed torches at people they were fighting.

[@David25512]

Hopefully Leonin become official official.

[@johnquiett1085]

@@David25512 If they keep delving into M:tG settings then it can't be too long.

[@BuddaOnDaRoll]

I miss the different sizes/versions of monsters in general. I get that maybe it was considered clutter, but i loved the variety.

[@sethpatterson7281]

I've been giving dragons class levels for a bit more umpf. My current party has unwittingly been helping a green dragon with sorcerer levels.

[@vinx.909]

sorcerer and wizards are great fits, barbarian would fit to, especially with white dragons (man my party is going to love that i though of that). though i don't see many dragons take fighter levels, or roque, or bard. though what could be silly could be equally scary. white dragon which bard levels, as you walk trough the ice tunnels you hear their song rise in volume, you hear the rithmic steps and every 4 steps the tail hits the floor marking the beginning of a new beat, each time a couple small icicles drop from the ceiling.

[@Battleguild]

Cybernetic Dragons (Artillerist Artificer/Forge Cleric) Fungal Dragons (Circle of Spores Druid)

[@johnhall8046]

So - dire honey badger, anyone...? 😏

[@AvronPlays]

John Hall Honey badger don’t care.

[@kylethomas9130]

Purple Worm tries to escape, but Honey Badger has a dig speed!

[@KevinVideo]

A Jann was a type of genie in 3.5e.

[@johnhall8046]

K Vid And in 1st/2nd Edition AD&D too. 🙂

[@zacharygadzinski3147]

I could see Jannis being introduced as a player character race. They're already medium size and they could get natural spells and cantrips like Tieflings. Yet they would make great sorcerers or noble genie warlocks since they would want to become either a Djinn, Dao, Madrid, or Efreeti. Not to mention any offspring they have with a non-Janni would be a genasi.

[@johnhall8046]

Sure, Jann... 😏

[@anthonystromeyer1399]

Channel Host, I believe you would enjoy a deep study of some Second Edition monster material; especially from the Dark Sun and Spelljammer Campaign Settings.

[@stanleyschlosser7495]

send in the books all the books evil chacle

[@stugod5000]

love the video, speaking about updates and conversions for 5th edition, would you ever consider doing a video about converting classes for different settings, ie modern-day, victorian fantasy/ monster of the week vs highschoolers

[@NerdImmersion]

Its not something I've thought of before, but its something I could look into!

[@stugod5000]

@@NerdImmersion the idea came around when my friend mentioned about doing a 5th edition high-schoolers in a weird town/monsters of the week game and asked if I could help convert the classes to social cliques in a school

[@williamings773]

Barbarian - The Jocks Rogue - Delinquents Fighters - Militarily Cadet Kids Wizards - Nerds Artificer - Nerds that make stuff Warlocks - Rich Kids Sorcerer - Popular Kids Bards - Arts Clubs Ranger - Boy Scouts Druids - Furries Monks - MMA Kids

[@stugod5000]

@@williamings773 this is what we had so far; Artificer: greaser Barbarian: Bullies Bard: glee club Bloodhunter: punks Cleric: preppy/goody two shoes Druid: eco-friendly/ hippy kids/ pagan kids Fighter: jocks Monk: MMA/bros Paladin: 'The all American'- the super popular but you can't hate them because they're NICE. Like they get along with everyone. Volunteers for everything, president of a few clubs. we couldn't think of another name that represented the trope or clique Ranger: scouts Rogues: juvenile delinquents Sorcerer: Drama club Warlocks: goth kids Wizards: nerds it's interesting to see where the crossover is

[@Spiceodog]

I love the scp reference " here, there be dragons" can you make a list of scps that could fit in as magic items or monsters in 5e?

[@Spiceodog]

I've added in soulberg to my first time dming, albeit with alot of creative freedom to warp it into a more DND -esque style. the player who found it became so attached to it that he made me put it in every campaign I ran, though I change some of its properties each time, and there's an unspoken rule in my party that when it's found, it's his. in every form, I give it a protective option, ( such as turning skin to steel, like it does to it's victims) and a offensive option. it's unanimously decided by my party to be the best homebrew I've made

[@BramLastname]

That life leach is so cool

[@ryanbritt4459]

I want the humanoid slime back those fun

[@l0stndamned]

Totally agree with you regarding the need for more dragon and drake variants. Drakes are particularly important because they can give the PCs the feel of fighting dragons when they're too low-level to face-off against the real thing. I've been home-brewing a load of drake species to enable this. New flavours of dragon-born linked to these might also be an idea. I think dire wolves stuck around because a) they've been in the game since the beginning and b) are based on an actual creature, rather than just because of GoT. I'm not normally a fan of other dire-critters, but did have a lot of fun unleashing a horde of dire penguins in a comedy-horror game. The Yrthak is one I'd like to see again. They're a comparatively low level huge flyer, so useful for dramatic outdoor encounters before the players are tough enough for adult dragons and their ilk, and their appearance and power-set makes them simultaneously creepy and hilarious. I really want to see a return of two obscure second-ed creatures: Fire Weed and Vampire Squids. (both were in Dragon at one stage, not sure if they ever appeared in an actual book) Fire weed was an underground plant that absorbed heat and chemical energy rather than sunlight. Not actually hostile but could give someone frostbite. Technically edible. I liked it just because it made the underdark ecosystem make more sense. Vampire Squids (I renamed them tunnel squids when I last used them due to there being an actual creature called vampire squids that the writers didn't know of) were aquatic beasts-of-burden bred by the mind-flayers to pull boats along underground rivers. Had a fun encounter using them to pull water-chariots for an underground speedboat chase.

[@ferrumurbis]

I've found that it's pretty easy to turn the base creatures in the Monster Manual into Dire creatures. The Dire Wolf just has +3 Con and Str over a regular wolf, along with a slightly higer AC and HP. If you wanted to apply that +3 to other stats to emphasize a swifter Dire animal, or maybe even a more intelligent Dire animal, just move the bonuses around. Then make the creature one size bigger, give it about 10 to 20 extra feet of movement, along with multiattack, and your group will be fearing Dire Deer for quite some time.

[@KZBluCaesar3]

Totally agree with Dragons being more powerful back then. I got a copy of the Draconomicon from 3e; my GAWD at how much more imposing and lethal they were in the old days.

[@BloodyCaesar]

Checked in my old physical sourcebooks, and you are right. MMII never had a rework in views of 3.5. I'd love to see a Shocker Lizard and the Abyssal Basilisk was indeed nightmare feed. Never had an Otyugh at all but damn those life effects!

[@lustykong7591]

id also love to see the ferrous dragons make a comeback

[@anthonystromeyer1399]

That sounds awesome 3? 3.5?

[@forloveofthepage2361]

The orcwort plant monster. It is a lie level adventure by itself. Check it out.

[@anthonystromeyer1399]

I will look that up now

[@Captainbigmike86]

We’re there any close contenders that you thought were not in 5e but then found in a module?

[@ezrashelton4464]

A draconomicon would be awesome!

[@LordZeebee]

Having only played 5e i have to say i do love all the little flavor things 3.5e has. Like, something as simple as what environment a monster inhabits can often be inferred in 5e but i like that it's just outright stated here. Way more evocative and helpful when designing your own encounters. That said, the formatting is absolutely atrocious. All that info results in a garbled mess of a stat-block that's almost intelligible at a glance. I've gained a new appreciation for 5e's readability.

[@tomharris5649]

It was especially fun locating ability scores. They were buried in the middle of the stat block. Usually.

[@chumpfy1773]

Says I love the shocker lizard Me YESSSSSSSSS I LOVE THEM

[@sharksuperiority9736]

I play dnd and dm primarily, but I’m still a little foggy on dnds history. What happened to 3e? I hear about 3.5, 4, 5, 1,. I don’t know much about 2e but I know it exists, but what about 3e?

[@rhysjonsmusic]

Basically 3e was made back when the internet wasnt so widespread. So when wizards of the coast had a bunch of rule changes and adjustments they wanted to make they created the revised version of 3e that we now know as 3.5

[@erichamilton1699]

10. Dragonne (and sub species) 9. Guardinals 8. Felldrake 7.Nightmare Beast 6. Nimblewright 5. Runic Guardian 4. Arcane Ooze 3. More Giants 2. SKULLCRUSHER OGRE! 1. Rakshasas (Ak'chazar and Naztharune)

[@valasafantastic1055]

Great video thanks!

[@LandonTheDM]

You might like the Clawfane from The Complete Guide to Nautical Campaigns :)

[@zacharygadzinski3147]

Sooner or later Wizards of the Coast should create more things for levels 10+. Not a D&D player but I believe that the players coming into D&D are going to want more of a challenge at higher levels.

[@dnddetective]

I think the problem dragons have at the moment in 5E is that they are not unique enough. You look at demons and devils and many of them offer vastly different abilities. But dragons are basically this: You have a claw attack, a bite attack, and maybe a tail attack. You get 80 feet flying speed. You get a breath weapon (of different types) that recharges. That's it. Yes there are dracoliches and shadow dragons, but the type really needs more variety. Even many of the dragons in the kobold press monster books don't deviate much from this.

[@masonknight6194]

Spider Eater. Goblin steed with extra archers, nets, fire bombs, ect.

[@williamings773]

I think a Celtic/Fey book would be cool, Dire animals can be in it as something being made winter court.

[@RIVERSRPGChannel]

Interesting list

[@collinbeckham8259]

My top 10 are a little different 1. Elder Evils 2. Odopi 3. Kaorti 4. Psurlon 5. Tsochari 6. Malaugrym 7. Uobilyth (Aerial Aboleth) 8. Uvuudaum 9. Tooth Beast of Dahlver-Nar 10. Director Beholders and Mounts

[@justinterry8894]

If wizards makes an actual dragonomicom they should include yellow orange purple and pink dragons as well as recannonize the other dragon gods and variants also a source book dedicated to beasts.

[@TheBaca219]

I want my disenchanter back

[@josephrandisi6416]

Dire wolves are an actual type of wolf. That's probably where fire animals in 3.5 and game of Thrones even came from. So I assume that dire wolves and no others are in because they existed.

[@NegatveSpace]

That's a lot of awesome great ideas but I wonder what wizards is thinking with current monsters. I get really mad going back and looking at 3.5 having something like 16 stat blocks for each type of dragon and in 5 we get like four?

[@colterjohnson1525]

The only thing I agree with you on is the dire animals. I loved wild shaping into a dire bear.

[@itaykerensm1629]

Well drakes are defined by having 4 legs and no wings. A winged drake would be either a wyvern or a dragon. Winged drakes are an interesting way to make a low int/cha dragon since in DND dragon are usually not something you can throw at a low lvl party.

[@Rosedragon15]

A new Draconomicon would be amazing. Bought it in 3.5 and I'd buy it again now. Especially because it could give guadiance to giving Dragonborns even more variety. More plant based monsters would also be phenomenal. More plant based everything would be great actually. Give me A Botanist's Guide to the Swordcoast, or wherever, just let me play a druid who wants to be a tree, or the hermit Ranger who knows more about plants than anyone rightly should

[@GaryBoyles342]

The siege crab would be great when combined with small creatures that live on it.

[@shanenice5380]

they gotta make Monster Manual 2 and fiend folio.after 5 years then make Monster Manual 3,take there time

[@vinx.909]

5e MM2: volo's guide to monsters 5e MM3: mordenkainen's tome of foes

[@VoctorVideo]

I feel like to get the gem dragons to stand out they really need the magic vs psionics component, and since they took arcane magic away from the chromatic and metallic dragons they can't really give psionics to the gem dragons. As a result they'd just be a batch of neutral dragons that otherwise end up exactly like the existing dragons. I could homebrew one in 5 minutes, but they aren't really that interesting. It's honestly not a huge surprise that we don't see them do more with dragons, they made them so generic in 5e that it's hard to do anything particularly interesting with them. They can make for a challenging encounter if used correctly, but don't have much depth beyond that.

[@NerdImmersion]

Agreed

[@melvixen1943]

Shocker lizzard could be dangerous if they can be summoned and are low cr. The monk has nonleathal blows so the shock could work like that. Shreaker: meh Basilisc: MTG did some very nice Basilisc arts. This bassilisc is awesome. Bring it back. It should have been in the Decent to Avernus book. Otyugh ... very "war of worlds". Chill touch could make it week though. Audrey 2: You can have other deadly plants. Gimpy gimpy, Dynamite tree etc. The deathfog though is fun. Its a plant right? Can its seeds be part of a plantgrowth spell? Snowflake ooze ... funky. Yes for drakes. Or some new wyvern version. Siege crab - Aquaman did it and the things were darn awesome. Dragons - yes please, update them. A book/erata with templates would be neat. Like elementals, vampire, giant, People ("furry") etc.

[@BudroThePious]

My top three would be 1- Temporal Drake 2- Fang Dragon 3- Aurumvorax

[@BudroThePious]

If they did a Draconomicon that included character options as well as all the dragons it would be great. I could easily see a draconic subclass for barbarian, cleric, monk, paladin, ranger, and warlock.

[@stanleyschlosser7495]

thay exist in some form i want to give the pages but i dont know if i get swarmed by the wizard coast law devils of the sixt plaine of hellp thayre commin

[@Xtra_Medium]

The monsters I miss the most are Clockwork Horrors (MM2), Urskan (Frostburn) and the Inevitables

[@anthonyblair8575]

The dragconomicion also has feats for dragons

[@Natsirt666]

I want an updated Steel Dragon. Their lore is soooooo cool.

[@CONTINGENCY_sys]

Dire bear. I've been playing a mountain giant (Fir'bolg) natural direbear lycanthrope for nearly my entire player career. I love dire animals. Even if Dire was a template like Feral or GodBlooded. I use them as shriekers as well. ;)

[@CONTINGENCY_sys]

Etherial Mauraders. Fun times. I had them scan from the etherial and lash out from the beyond (so to speak) on adventuring parties until they damage them. Then I would have them soul scan (like heat from shriekers) so they can see the players. Fun times.

[@CONTINGENCY_sys]

I had they could never see undead or even lich with phylacteries as their soul was not locked within them.

[@dracon7530]

I completely agree with your list man, the only downside will be getting hands on there minis especially dragons as they are rare and just expensive

[@enricorix]

Lets convert them!!!

[@David_Apollonius]

An ethereal marauder is just a phase spider without the poison. Although the 3.5 phase spider was better than the 5e one because it could appear, attack and vanish in 1 round. Both suck compared to the ethereal filcher who would steal the party's magical loot and then walk through a wall. Dire wolfs are the only dire animals in 5e because dire wolfs were the only dire animals on Earth. Dire wolfs used to exist, dire weasels never did.

[@vinx.909]

how would you go about introducing a lot of dragons in the game though? don't get me wrong, i love dragons, and every dragon so far has had something unique about them. the gold dracolich, the green dragon party patron, the black overly acidic bastard in his monestray that drives the monks crazy in their stone sleep, the pirate white dragon with a breath that creates ice elementals, the copper dragon that decides to be a passenger on a ship for a day. but this has been all the dragons that exist in the world at present in a game that has been going for 16 months now.

[@salvadortoscano2534]

*IF* WotC gives us a dragon resource book, they *need* to update/change Dragonborn to actually make sense! If you choose to be a dragonborn, you're already starting off the game MAD, and you don't get much chance to use your signature racial feature because *you only have 1 use of your breath weapon,* at least RAW. If I can get a DM to agree with your Fixing Dragonborn video, awesome, but I think it would be a little easier to just have an official repair of the race

[@johnhall8046]

Oh noes - dire flumphs!!! 😱

[@kekkres]

I was always under the impression that gem dragons where remarkably unpopular compared to the other offshoots

[@TheDragonshunter]

I would buy that dragons book even if I dont DM

[@buckveazey3369]

Dire animals not the legendary animals from the Druid handbook Fang and Claw?

[@dannya.2616]

"Haha, what's the matter, Snowflake? Can't handle the- AAAH! ARGHHH! (Choking noises)" - Former Rightwing KZbinr

[@zacharygadzinski3147]

Keep the left wing politics out. As someone who wants to get into D&D I find that leftists destroy anything they touch. Leftists complaining about things they don't understand and attacking fans and people who have a different opinion than they do. The SJW infestation of entertainment is worse than the 80s Satanic panic. In fact it's history repeating itself thanks to SJWs. Most people just want entertainment not politics of any kind.

[@dannya.2616]

@@zacharygadzinski3147 Keep your rightwing politics out. As someone ALREADY into D&D I find righties destroy everything they touch. Rightwingers complaining about other people's comments they don't understand and attack people with different opinions than they have. The Satanic Panic WAS LITERALLY rightwing in nature, thanks to religious extremists. SJW is a bullshit term used by morons to shut down arguments they have neither the will nor intellectual capacity to engage with. I hope you see how easy your arguments were to mock and dismiss, and that you try harder next time.

[@zacharygadzinski3147]

@@dannya.2616 You truly don't realize how corrupt Leftists are. The left has destroyed a lot of our culture and entertainment. And you attempting to insult me has no effect since it can mirrored back at. Also, most of the people responsible for the Satanic panic were older. Younger Republicans know better. However, Democrats are totalitarian bigots. They say they're inclusive but the opposite is true. As soon as someone they claim to care about has a different opinion they get hysterical. By the end of the day leftists just see you as a walking moneybags. All they care about is power and control.

[@dannya.2616]

@@zacharygadzinski3147 Holy shit your projection is hysterical. Before you comment again, recognize one thing: I made one joke, clearly referencing the "Snowflake Ooze" from the video. YOU (moron, rightwinger) then felt compelled to tell ME to CENSOR MY POLITICAL VIEWS. If anyone here is the unprovoked authoritarian here, it's the fucking moron who can't recognize his own hypocrisy.

[@ArvelDreth]

I want to see the destrachan and the avolakia in 5e.

[@radkobachvaroff]

Hey now a days you could make a Giant War Crab

[@David25512]

Is that a McFarlane's Spiderman shirt?

[@NerdImmersion]

It is!

[@garrettdaly9893]

I say dire animals all time and supprised we both said snowflake ooze

[@0mega_fps353]

Love the content. Cant get over the fact that you look like Ted Cruz if he were influenced by WOTC instead of Teddy Roosevelt

[@fuzzydragon]

plant type monsters are insanely underrepresented in 5e.

[@nonnolento]

The only monster deserve to ruin party in D&d, the MOLBORO of Final fantasy series

[@Dreadstealer]

i want to ask a question: will there be a Top 10 3.5e Races for 5e? i am curious cause there are some races 3.5 had that were intresting. also i liked that you looked on the 3.5 monster list, i liked it especially the dragons and drakes keep it up LET THERE BE DRAGONS AND OTHER CREATURES

[@NerdImmersion]

I'll add it to my list for patrons to vote on!

[@markrajca6783]

I was very surprised that they didn’t have dire animals in fifth edition besides dire wolves and even then those dire wolves seem more like natural animals

[@kekkres]

That's because dire wolves are real ice age animals, or were, they are extinct now. Most but not all Dnd dire animals where cenozoic larger versions of modern creatures; ala short faced bear =dire bear, wooly rhino =dire rhino

[@markrajca6783]

Yes, and Titana bowa and such as well. I always liked the design of the the old dire animals, but I do appreciate the real ancient animals.

[@deafstrike1796]

Check out the book of dragons 1 and 2(it's available at the dms guild)

[@GunnarWahl]

can we get back the different size to flipping Elementals? all we really have are medium, but no large, no colossal, no tiny, come on. Animate water or fire basically require a stat block that doesn't exist.

[@KevinVideo]

I made sure to drop my own personal list on your Discord. I'd have dropped it here, but unfortunately there's too much text.

[@cmoore6547]

If you dont think telling d&d stories would be a good fit for your channel, then just do clips of the more interesting situations from your games for those of us who can't commit to watching full games.

[@stanleyschlosser7495]

got even a dire stirge dire weazel alsos

[@stanleyschlosser7495]

i can give you the stats eventualy in a way

[@FKaos]

Is it me or was that a scp reference

[@jamesaolsen1196]

I appreciate that people want to hear stories from you and all, but you don't need to be all things to all people.

[@NerdImmersion]

Thank you for saying so!

[@rick8216]

smh didnt specify the dire badger. make it cr 20 for no reason.