NEW 2024 DUNLOP CX 200 TENNIS RACKET REVIEW

[@cabforwardooo9983]

Dunlop racquets are terribly underrated. I have the previous version of the CX 200 OS (105 sq in), and it's fantastic. In stock form it's way too light for me, but I added weight to the hoop and grip to match my previous racquet's balance and weight (Head Prestige Pro). This version looks good, and it's going for only $200.

[@bretts5571]

I use the 2021 cx 400 tour, great racquet, looking into the 2024 200 tour this time around

[@MrCantabrigian]

Been playing a few of these in the tour flavor from the Anderson era with a ton of lead and tour bite in 18/20. May have to give this new version a hit. Thoughts?

[@arjaylarga1228]

What string and tension do you recommend?

[@derekpappas1556]

Which racquets other than the dunlop cx 98 racquet , do you think coach chris was eluding too ? Do you have and will you be testing soon the 95 cx's and or others in the cx line ? Coach chris stated as well in a previous video that no pro would use an off the shelf / non pro stock racquet. Therefore would those individuals who add weight to this racquet be unable to optimize it to a pro stock level ? Is it only weight in the layup that prevents this racquet from being tour quality vs junior quality , since it was stated that it had the power and stability already ?

[@tomgoehring3749]

Heard Power, Heard Feel. My question is Comfort? Stability at that low swing weight?

[@phyotennis7462]

Stable enough for most decent level recreational players, and very comfortable. I got mine and switched from Boom Pro. Play very similar but CX is definitely more comfortable.

[@TennisASMR]

Seems to really suit Harry’s swing path & stroke...will we see a leaded up one in the future??

[@cincotennisacademy]

In my opinion from all the models i played with they sure do carry a lot of power with minimal effort

[@MosPat89]

please do a comparison between blade, cx, pure strike and radikal.

[@TheBlessedLion]

If you are a good player, it’s all the same….when you get paid for advertising it…

[@j1mster3]

demo them yourself, take these influencers opinions with a grain of salt they all here to promote and push sales. My bag is all protaffs but i keep one Dunlop which is CX 200 Tour because they all feel very similar due to box beam design. If you dont like rackets like prostaff or head prestige then this might be boring to you.

[@Nellethiex]

How does the comfort match the radical pro? I have a bit in my arms when i play with radical... 🙈

[@phyotennis7462]

Radical is the worst I have experienced with very harsh on the arm. I have a lot of 98 frames. CX 200 is the definitely super comfortable than Radical or most 98 frames on the market. But Blade98 V8 also quite comfortable if you like control 98 frame.

[@bretts5571]

Your groundstrokes remind me of Andre Agassi

[@Dejan254]

Harry, why dont u measure anymore the weight, balance and SW?

[@derekpappas1556]

The previous edition was a wedged shape upper beam and was changed to a box beam . How did the cosmetics apeal to you ? I saw this racquet in the store and compared it to the previous edition color . The previous edition , to me was far more appealing to the eye than this models flat and bland cosmetic combination . Only the tours leather grip. made it look passable . No strings were added . Black string would stiffen it up needlessly . Lastly the durability of the paint , in relation to rubbing off and easy chipping , is still in question .

[@bopaunovic5751]

Control on this racquet is insane. Volleys on this racquet is insane. Not sure about the power comments. Seems like the power must come from you. So string low. Not sure why, but the 16 × 19 Tour justseems quicker, thus easier

[@StuartStephen]

I was also surprised by the free power comments as the CX200 is a control racket similar to the Pure Strike 98.

[@dandan.tennis]

Yay! :)

[@slowbot68]

tour version?

[@derekpappas1556]

I presume he is stating , that if a tour version of the 98 was available , then he would switch from his radical to it . The other gentleman confused his statement with the 95 tour that Chris had before the switch to the radical .

[@googlereviewer1944]

These guys are terrible at reviewing racquets.

[@bojack3827]

Agree. That Chris guy is particularly bad. He just mumbles on about easy power and thicker beam yet this is LOW powered control racquet with a LOW 314 swing weight and THIN beamed.

[@kimmorrison9169]

yeah, there are any number of guys doing proper racquet reviews

[@NatNatz889]

@@kimmorrison9169who? Whats their account?

[@tthuynh]

First

[@fingersm]

No bargain bin racquet to review??? Why not string it with Piano strings??