Link to the forum Post : forum.warthunder.com/t/cm-covert-disclosures-no-3-updates-from-smin/161025/54
@bruhmomentum2901Ай бұрын
You fr thought germany will be getting something unique or good? naur bro 💀
@Iron_Blood_Enjoyer1933Ай бұрын
A few US SPAA I think could be added are: The T77 MGMC (An M24 Chaffee armed with 6 .50 cals. in a new turret), the XM246 (The entry from General Dynamics into the DIVADs contest, aka what was to become the M247 Sgt. York), the M114A2 (As you mentioned, which is an M114 ACP armed with a 20mm Hispano-Suiza HS.820 in a semi-closed turret), and the the T85E1 (A Stuart chassis armed with four 20mm Oerlikons).
@averageb21enthusiast-ex5gkАй бұрын
As long as its not the skink. Anything other than the skink.
@DawgIVLifeАй бұрын
America gets a skink UK gets a Ram II
@VMUDreamАй бұрын
The skink is good
@Tr1ky_V1ckАй бұрын
It looks like it's the skink and another aa
@Sky_EggYTАй бұрын
Overtiered wirblewind
@DawgIVLifeАй бұрын
@@Sky_EggYT I mean sure but its very well protected from all aircraft cannons till around 30mms. Wirblewind can be 50cal
@WeZwarcrimesАй бұрын
the lack of an Su-15 is saddening I've been wanting the soviet F-104 forever
@notazombie...notatall8577Ай бұрын
I'm ok with gaijin adding the skink, but they should give it the anti-armor shells, there are reports on the British 20mm (the same used on the skink and other british AA) being abble to penetrate 50mm of armor from 100m away, and then gaijin makes the vehicle only capable of pen 38mm of armor... Also gaijin how about you give the *British* M3 lee Grant for the british too? 🤨
@DawgIVLifeАй бұрын
why you have dusters that already do the anti tank better, America is in need of SPAA not more anti tank SPAA
@paulking7019Ай бұрын
@@DawgIVLife How about an M8 Greyhound for the U.S. but in the normal tech tree instead of behind a paywall. It has a .50 Cal that is great for low tier CAS. If they can't do that then they should lock the one in the Chinese tech tree behind a paywall too. If anyone wants to keep playing the Chinese M8, they would need to pay to do so. The U.S needs more wheeled vehicles that are not behind a paywall. There are others already in the game, but you have to buy them all now. Lastly Half tracks are just that. Half tracks, and not fully wheeled vehicles. The U.S. is not alone in this need for wheeled vehicles. Event vehicles were always a bad idea anyway especially for people that weren't playing the game at the time of the event.
@DawgIVLifeАй бұрын
@@paulking7019 sure add a non 50 cal one to the tech tree
@teentitanss1845Ай бұрын
An explanation to on why it has lower pen values in game compared to irl is because a few years back Gaijin changed the way armor penetration calculation worked. From historical documents and data on how much they could pen irl to a new formula or system which calculates everything. Idk what it's called but you'll prob find it if you search for it.
@paulking7019Ай бұрын
@@DawgIVLife Deal, but only if it's added as a reserve 1.0 with a 30 cal for anti CAS, and then move the other 2 Greyhounds to at least BR 2.0 or higher. Greyhounds, with their .50 cal and 37mm are more than a match for an M 22 Locust as well as quite a few other vehicles. Unfortunately None of this will ever happen.
@MilkTruck1210Ай бұрын
War thunder, war thunder mobile and enlisted is cooking this week. And it's just Tuesday
@LokirofRorikstedАй бұрын
"sholef bug fixes" gaijin: "we changed nothing" oh.. I was almost starting the game to grind the battlepass
@DawgIVLifeАй бұрын
Yea the gun was never the issue the tank is just bad
@Drunk_SasquatchАй бұрын
@DawgIVLife i watched Dollar Plays video on the Sholef and he was just playing repair sim every match and every engagement.
@DawgIVLifeАй бұрын
@@Drunk_Sasquatch yup they gave it extra internal modules, so the autoloader is modeled and if it gets damaged it no longer can fire till you repair it.
@blu5021Ай бұрын
@@DawgIVLifeyeah, me and friends LITERALLY FOUND A VIDEO of it reloaded and gaijin ignored it. Apparently it was a bad source. (One of the guys who helped with the report has a KZbin channel with the evidence and whatnot on it, his channel is whongy111)
@SoneGurkeАй бұрын
hopefully the leopard 2 with 140mm cannon
@IkarusGhostIАй бұрын
yeah W pfp
@cqwerty1234LАй бұрын
Honestly, I think it'll either be the Panzer 87/140 or one of the other Swiss Panzers seeing how we got the FFA P-16 this update
@feraltrafficcone4483Ай бұрын
The event vehicle got confirmed to be the Boxer MGS. It’s another 105 eight wheeled boy but apparently it’s gonna be really good?
@GavinSchmavin44Ай бұрын
They never specified if the event vehicle was premium, so assuming it's not, it's been a common theme that non premium event vehicles are often higher tier vehicles Object 292, Mississippi, F14 and the lasted battleship for reference. Given that it's probably gonna be a Leo type or a boxer vehicle in my opinion, knowing that the boxer was one of the "leaked" vehicles not that long ago
@GavinSchmavin44Ай бұрын
Right as I type this the vehicle is announced and it is a boxer type lol
@nomore3115Ай бұрын
if they add another top tier leopard to the event i am gonna quit
@AlRizz187Ай бұрын
nah i would grind a panzer 87 140
@colbym7610Ай бұрын
Panzer 58 would make sense after the P-51 Jet we just got. Fingers crossed! Either that or the Luchs/leopard ww2
@salt_of_soulsАй бұрын
Lowe.... Just imagine
@DawgIVLifeАй бұрын
If they add the Lowe, Everyone has to mispronounce its a requirement for the vehicle.
@Heinz_von_WestfalenАй бұрын
@@DawgIVLifeThe pain as a german man
@Trigger_fingerАй бұрын
the M60A1 RISE P uses M735 as well
@VuPhan-hf2izАй бұрын
thought it was another document leak💀
@DawgIVLifeАй бұрын
Tbh classified documents leaks became so common it got unfunny and boring.
@NoImNotJonsAltWhatDoYouMeanАй бұрын
Holy smokes! I did not expect the Ram II for the UK, I wanted this for eons. Love to see "new" Canadian content for the game, I hope the UK Ram and US Skink are different in any way.
@Armata6348Ай бұрын
I could see the Panzer 87 140 for Germany as an event vehicle.
@Shibes770Ай бұрын
What I’m questioning is, when are they going to do another dagor engine update?
@DawgIVLifeАй бұрын
Other than adding more graphics settings like frame generation I don’t see how a new dagor will improve much. They own the engine so they make minor updates to it often.
@dubstepmachine4430Ай бұрын
Stuka zu fuss would be a very epic event vehicle
@nielsbekkers8283Ай бұрын
Need more Dutch vehicles, aircraft and naval ships for, (ugh), france so that I can allow myself to start that tech tree.
@epicwargamer01Ай бұрын
No, the Lowe heavy. It would be a perfect replacement for the tiger 105 and panther 2 because it will be them in one
@DawgIVLifeАй бұрын
So add another fake tank to replace fake tanks that where removed for being fake?
@epicwargamer01Ай бұрын
@DawgIVLife well, it is sure better to add a mix of the panther 2 and tiger 105 than to add something modern again. The Germans in ww2 had a lot of crazy project vehicles, and the Löwe was one of them, fortunately. If built, it would have had very good armor, moderate speed, and good firepower. Let's not look at things as fake when they existed in some way. At least this hit the drawing board but lost in favor of the Maus. If we call this fake then we also have to call a lot if the german stuff fake like, the ostwind 2, the kueglblitz, the waffentrager, and the Tiger 2 Sla. 16
@nejcjelovcanАй бұрын
Why are there already leak lists out after 2 wekks in the update
@DawgIVLifeАй бұрын
Because gaijin sees how popular they are so why not do it in a official manner, and the next update isn’t that far away
@nejcjelovcanАй бұрын
@@DawgIVLife so what u want to tell me that there will be an updare in a month or so
@DawgIVLifeАй бұрын
@nejcjelovcan pretty much it is the busiest time of year for Warthunder with the anniversary sales events etc.
@nejcjelovcanАй бұрын
@@DawgIVLife oh ok thx
@nejcjelovcanАй бұрын
@@DawgIVLifeill follow u
@w1zz0k12Ай бұрын
Idc what they add I need to grind it and sell it for battle pass and premium
@mystic0970Ай бұрын
PzH 2000 perhaps
@giovieira5897Ай бұрын
tank only game mode? ...no? nvm
@ah-64apache92Ай бұрын
Something new that would be good vs russian pay lineup? Nah best we can get is copy pasted boxer with almost copy pasted turret
@jamesminter70Ай бұрын
German ground battle BRs are a joke.
@mastercief1998Ай бұрын
Bring back sturm tiger
@Lndmk227Ай бұрын
Ship gameplay improvements are good and all, but you need some actual ships to make them applicable. How about an update that focuses entirely on breathing new life into the naval gameplay? How about a submarine mode (a la Helicopter mode)? New late-war battleships? AA missiles for nations BESIDES Russia? New swamp-type maps for coastal boats? Your naval gameplay seems almost completely forgotten, Gaijin. There's very little to it so far. When are you going to put some actual work into it?
@DawgIVLifeАй бұрын
The problem with naval isn't the mode its that the concept of naval warfare is boring to most people and only the popular ships are even known. There is so many ships in WT right now that no one ever heard of till it was added. That is very rare for a aircraft or a tank.
@Lndmk227Ай бұрын
@@DawgIVLife Unless you're a tank/aircraft enthusiast anyway, I doubt that. Now, because I'm a bit of a plane and WWII history enthusiast myself I knew about the Mustang, Thunderbolt, Lightning, Flying Fortress, Superfortress (most people might know about these five if they knew anything about WWII or saw a picture) and the Warhawk. (These are all US aircraft, but I'll come around to that point.) I learned about the Vindicator, Wildcat, Hellcat, Corsair, and Devastator through naval docs. Of the naval aircraft I also bet people are relatively familiar the Avenger and Dauntless. Then you have the Phantom, Tomcat, Eagle and Falcon/Viper because they're among the most prolific and successful fighters in modern history. On the other hand, I would have struggled to name anything aside from a Spitfire, Messerschmidts, the Swordfish, Zeroes, or Fockewulfs for the WWII era. Saabs, MIGs, Sukhois, and Tupolevs for the modern era, but apart from the Spitfire and Swordfish, I'd struggle to match the exact models to their pictures. I'll grant you that most people are more aware of their own nations' stuff than those of others, so it probably rings true in a respective manner for other nations. Aside from the Shermans, Panthers and Tigers, though, I only knew about the Abrams because it was our current MBT. I couldn't have picked any Russian tank out of a lineup. I found out about the Pershing's existence when I played Company of Heroes, but that was about the extent of my knowledge. Point being, there are plenty of ships among individual nations as well that are plenty famous. IJN Yamato, Musashi, USS Iowa, Missouri, New Jersey, Texas, Enterprise, Gearing, Johnston, HMS Rodney, King George V, Invincible, Hood, KMS Graf Spee, Bismarck, Tirpitz, Scharnhorst, and the list goes on. Many of those ships are, like other things mentioned above, more familiar to the country of origin or enthusiasts, but are every bit as, if not more, famous or infamous regardless. My original point was that Naval hasn't even broken into the upper BRs yet, and there is still plenty of space and lots of famous and less famous ships of different eras to go. This is to say nothing of conceptual ships that were planned but never got off the page. There's still plenty of room to grow and expand upon it. It's my favorite game mode, but seems to get no real love.
@ProcrastinaterАй бұрын
If a graphic setting adds realism at the expense of visibility, you should not be able to toggle it off. Unless it impacts game performance, as in fps, in which case it should not be implemented. You should not be punished for wanting realism in war thunder of all games.
@DawgIVLifeАй бұрын
Player choice is always better special for a feature that is just cosmetic
@ProcrastinaterАй бұрын
@@DawgIVLife If enabling it obfuscates an enemy in any way, then having it enabled is detrimental, giving an advantage to those who chose not to enable it. In this case, you should not be able to disable it. For instance, if you could disable gun smoke from a tank gun, then having it enabled would put you at a disadvantage. Just have everyone enjoy and suffer equally when it comes to visual effects.
@DawgIVLifeАй бұрын
@@Procrastinater iirc gunner sight grass is on by default you can turn off grass in the gunner view. Vapor can be a toggle just like grass in tank sight is.
@ProcrastinaterАй бұрын
@@DawgIVLife Yes, and imo, you should not be able to turn it off. But for gunner sights, I'm assuming that is to sell preminum bushes, but that's the snail being the snail.
@DawgIVLifeАй бұрын
@Procrastinater no that is to make it so when you are looking though tall grass you can see right though it. Has nothing to do with bushes on your tank.
@michakikowski8887Ай бұрын
Germany bruh wow really gajin another one
@IkarusGhostIАй бұрын
HELL YES 🇩🇪🇩🇪🇩🇪🇩🇪🦅🦅🦅🔥🔥🔥💪💪💪 WTF IS A SPEED LIMIT?????
@kiri101Ай бұрын
'Leaks' - nice clickbait
@DawgIVLifeАй бұрын
Leak is a Synonym of Disclose,and the CM titled the article "CM Covert Disclosures" It is a leak from the community managers.
@kiri101Ай бұрын
@@DawgIVLife The majority of English speakers would read 'leak' as 'an unauthorised disclosure'. 'Preview' or 'reveal' might be more appropriate, even if it engenders fewer clicks.
@simpleknight1922Ай бұрын
Didnt the M42 had proxy shell
@DawgIVLifeАй бұрын
40mm proxy shells where not a thing till around the early 70s.
@simpleknight1922Ай бұрын
@@DawgIVLife I mush have mistaken it for something else then. Anyhow thanks for the update