It’d be funny if the anchor was Phil Coulson seeing how his death is the reason the Avengers came together.
@JonReynoldsESQ2 ай бұрын
Nice.
@pinaka54612 ай бұрын
Death of anchor=death of universe
@brandonhall45472 ай бұрын
@@pinaka5461 immediately lol so it still could be
@jemmitt212 ай бұрын
It could be Phil since it takes thousands of years for it to happen
@Lordander12 ай бұрын
Phil was resurrected and technically still alive, since Agent’s of Shield is technically canon.
@Shevy_Seby2 ай бұрын
It’s Stan Lee I said it 🤷♂️
@MisterEae2 ай бұрын
That makes a lot of sense. The MCU started dying after he did.
@LUCAS420BLZ2 ай бұрын
After Lee passed the MCU has been riddled with garbage
@SirsasthNigam.2 ай бұрын
Watchers Informant never died in MCU his last appearance was IW and Endgame
@karasu68292 ай бұрын
YESSSSS I WAS THINKING THE SAME 🎉🎉🎉
@KrispyLewis2 ай бұрын
@@MisterEae DAM 😂
@JustinsYTchannel432 ай бұрын
The sacred timeline doesn’t have an anchor nor need one. The other timelines need one to anchor them to the sacred timeline. Anchor beings are the ones that create that branch.
@quacker79002 ай бұрын
the true opinion
@stevemariotv20072 ай бұрын
Makes sense
@JustinsYTchannel432 ай бұрын
@@stevemariotv2007 it’s the only logical conclusion given the visual representation we are given during the Loki series of the sacred timeline structure.
@group555_2 ай бұрын
The sacred timeline isn't special in the slightest. It's just another time line. It just so happened to be the one that belonged to the version of he who remains who won
@graemejack90402 ай бұрын
There’s nothing special about the sacred timeline! It’s only named that by HWR and the TVA!
@drmercinstien17382 ай бұрын
I'm going with Dr. Strage because of how Feige is super meticulous and specific about the words he chooses to use he called him "the anchor and the....actor to lead the mcu into the madness that is the multiverse"
@peelychallenges69422 ай бұрын
I agree. It could even work with the whole "a few thousands years to decay" shebang because what if the timeline saw strange dying in dr strange 1 and then reseting time didnt fix it but he stayed in the loop for god knows how long. Feige literally said long enough for him to master the mystic arts. And we saw he mastered it alright. That takes some serious time.
@miguel_fr2 ай бұрын
My thoughts exactly.
@titan1umtitanАй бұрын
I'd agree if Anchor Being wasn't a meta term to describe character that, when their story is done and over with, their cinematic universe crumbles around it
@akiohitoshi2 ай бұрын
I believe though that there is no anchor being in Earth-616 since it's the “Sacred Timeline” unlike the other universes that lives outside the sacred timeline which relies on an anchor being for the universe to live on.
@SherrickDuncan2 ай бұрын
Our Anchor Being is Jonathan Majors. 😂
@terrancewhitfield548Ай бұрын
No
@felipeangiolucci98702 ай бұрын
The anchor being died 2 thousands years ago? "What am I supposed to say? Jesus?"
@SmoochieMcgoo2 ай бұрын
Perhaps, "Marvel Jesus"?
@DillardBCommons2 ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂
@kevinoira61012 ай бұрын
😂😂😂
@Nicholas_Chen_2 ай бұрын
Yeah Jesus seems like a good candidate
@cevcena66922 ай бұрын
@@Nicholas_Chen_ Jesus would be the anchor being of our universe
@jazzybtwixxy2 ай бұрын
I think it would be cute if they said it was Stan Lee. Everyone thinks that it’s Tony Stark but Stan Lee passed around the time of endgame. It would be such a clever way to pay homage to him.
@oranjmusemeyer9682 ай бұрын
And Stan would love that! Excellent idea!
@anonemous78812 ай бұрын
I guess Stan Lee could be the Anchor Being for 1218 (our universe) the world went to shit after he passed
@A4Kelly2 ай бұрын
I was gonna say this. He's also been in more movies than Tony Stark
@jazzybtwixxy2 ай бұрын
@@A4Kelly THIS!!
@IanM-id8or2 ай бұрын
in reality, Stan Lee was indeed the Anchor Being of Marvel
@b_e_thecreative2 ай бұрын
Howard Stark could be the anchor being. He worked on projects in WWI, WII, founding member of SHIELD, The Manhanttan project, kicks of the MCU in origins with Captain America, and set the foundation for Tony. Everything Tony has done was because of his father and even in death, he had influence on Tony's actions. The very details of his death divided the Avengers and in Endgame, Howard is the direct catalyst for closure for Tony.
@Happysecret1802 ай бұрын
He died tho
@michealnotmichael65952 ай бұрын
Since when did Howard met the Watcher in the MCU? I don’t think I recall that every happening
@b_e_thecreative2 ай бұрын
@@michealnotmichael6595 Wasn't MCU, in the comics
@b_e_thecreative2 ай бұрын
@@Happysecret180 They said the person could be daed for years already and be an anchor
@michealnotmichael65952 ай бұрын
@@b_e_thecreative Ah, well maybe but this is kinda irrelevant to the MCU’s anchor being
@laithamekir57782 ай бұрын
My vote is Happy Hogan... We see him in daredevil, he helped create ironman and the original mcu, he was apart of every major event and still shows up... suprise...
@honeybee48892 ай бұрын
My mind jumps to Thor when discussing anchor beings. I foresee that it has to be someone with a long life span.
@brandonmerriman68842 ай бұрын
that’s why it has to be Captain America
@kellanwlasitzАй бұрын
@@brandonmerriman6884 funnily enough it's Doctor strange
@terrancewhitfield548Ай бұрын
No
@kellanwlasitzАй бұрын
@@terrancewhitfield548 the director of the movies said he was (can't remember his name)
@adityayaswanth56452 ай бұрын
I suspect if tony stark was indeed the anchor being, then 616 also started to die. why would paradox pick deadpool to join the 616 universe which is going to have a similar fate as 10005.
@WaffleBunBuns2 ай бұрын
good theory but it's the sacred timeline so maybe paradox wouldn't want to prune it
@Tornadospeed102 ай бұрын
Valid argument. It’s likely that either the 616 universe anchor being is still alive, or that 616 lacks an anchor being as that timeline can never cease
@adityayaswanth56452 ай бұрын
@butcherdesuyoi Do you think TVA already knows that incursion is going to happen? God of stories might but Paradox!?
@Mateja-ds3nh2 ай бұрын
it 199999 not 616
@StaxxxCmd2 ай бұрын
Deadpool stayed in 10005 though
@jpyanity4432 ай бұрын
So we want someone who has been in the MCU since the beginning, who is still around now, and from a meta level has played a pivotal role in the universe? It’s Happy Hogan
@Gorrilaguy952 ай бұрын
Or Thor hear me out he can live for over thousands of years so could it be him
@AustynSN2 ай бұрын
That... It... It's ridiculous, but makes *WAY* too much sense on both a story and meta level not to be true.
@SherrickDuncan2 ай бұрын
It's Jonathan Majors. 😅
@Shaunshahriar2 ай бұрын
@@Gorrilaguy95and deadpool has been saying this all throughout the movie. Why is thor crying. That defenenitely confirms thor being the anchor.
@rulerjayohenn3161Ай бұрын
@@Shaunshahriarbecause the anchor is loki
@LeumasTheOnly2 ай бұрын
I don’t think that the main MCU has an anchor being. The idea of an anchor being I feel ties to the “sacred timeline.” Because of this I feel that there is no need for one because of the fact that it is the main universe.
@Dethmothcreations2 ай бұрын
I kinda like the idea that maybe the 616 universe is an experiment to fill a universe with multiple "anchor beings" - to see if a universe can survive when the focus is on multiple people
@timurjack87732 ай бұрын
Tony and Banner for 2 reasons: 1- They were in the first 2 movies in 2008. 2- Tony and Banner used the Infinity Gauntlet in Endgame.
@RiverRockRecords2 ай бұрын
@@timurjack8773 both left the planet at times though... and its clearly not Tony considering he did die lol
@drewc80522 ай бұрын
@@timurjack8773banner has done very little for being an anchor being
@antoniopanzetta47782 ай бұрын
@@RiverRockRecords Whether or not they were the anchor beings aside: Them leaving the planet doesn't matter. The whole universe is in Earth-616. Not just earth itself.
@Saida___2 ай бұрын
Why couldn’t the anchor being be K.E.V.I.N? The robot basically breaks the fourth walls and immortal and basically controls everyone fates on the screen. Also Feige literally made MCU from scratch and has saved it from decaying whenever required.
@damonm.2 ай бұрын
Was that K.E.V.I.N. in Deadpool and Wolverine recording what Johnny Storm was saying about Cassandra Nova?
@aidanrowsey8802 ай бұрын
Bru you think they made a robot the anchor being I mean no shot lol but had to be him recording Johnny fs
@jeremybarnes3698Ай бұрын
KEVIN is not a living being. And he’s not from the sacred timeline.
@pallen26452 ай бұрын
By definition it has to be a Kang variant. The 616 "sacred timeline" exists far into the future with only He Who Remains. Wanda is a Nexus being, which is in some ways the opposite of what we understand as an Anchor being. A nexus being exists in every timeline in some form and are bound to no one universe.
@justicejr14862 ай бұрын
9:00 bruh feige is telling us it’s strange, don’t look so into it 😅
@DontaeWilliams-r6p2 ай бұрын
I was thinking the same thing like he literally just said it lol
@ryanbroady12862 ай бұрын
you can tell by Benedict’s body language after Feige says anchor
@elrodillo072 ай бұрын
The anchor being is whoever they feel is gonna boost the popularity and money for the mcu
@shaenoyt2 ай бұрын
👏
@desmondcoleman14092 ай бұрын
👏
@FaceFamous2 ай бұрын
Exactly it aint that deep. Its going to be about the money and revival of the company
@johnsantos5072 ай бұрын
I get the feeling it could be Doctor Doom.
@BuNnyDuDeDaRoO2 ай бұрын
He said that when he mentioned hugh jackman being the consistent star power in the fox films.. so yes you're right, but dig deeper
@Godwave_2 ай бұрын
If it’s a hero it would probably make sense for it to be Thor. He’s been around the longest, wasn’t blipped, is still active and has been through most all of the major events and seems to still have an important role to play. It’s feels like this current MCU universe will end when this version of Thor is done. It seems like they may be setting up to reboot everything after secret wars.
@hiphipjorge57552 ай бұрын
I agree, Thor is one of the principal characters for sure, he has the cosmic power level of others like Strange or Scarlet Witch BUT he's been around throughout almost the entire run of the MCU
@darrenrichardson61462 ай бұрын
Yeah, and it's a role that won't be hurt by the actor aging, as Thor does age over time to become more grizzled and wise like his father.
@nebnub49652 ай бұрын
What if Thor was crying cause deadpool sacrificed himself for Thor, so that the 616 anchor wouldn’t die, breaking Thors absolute point 🤷♂️
@stewiegriffin38632 ай бұрын
Damn. I see what you did there bruh@@nebnub4965
@richardanderson-gj8wr2 ай бұрын
Actually I didn't think about that he would be older than everyone of them except maybe loki
@apex9806Ай бұрын
I think it's either Odin or Thor. Especially Odin since he was the all Father and had so much power over all other realms and the entire Universe as a whole.
@whatevertf1232 ай бұрын
It’s definitely strange because in infinity war Tony asked him what does he do besides balloon animals and he responded with protecting your reality.
@TheBlackMadonna110 күн бұрын
Who said this 😊
@chalizex5 күн бұрын
@@TheBlackMadonna1Doctor Strange, I believe
@caffreydavis2182 ай бұрын
My question atill remains: Why is an Anchor Being necessary if humans live only for up to 80-100 years? Was there a prior anchor being? And if so, how is the mantle passed onto someone else? Why is an Anchor Being necessary for the MCU?
@DillardBCommons2 ай бұрын
Exactly what I was wondering
@Microsoft-Excel-20102 ай бұрын
Do be fair, wasn't Wolverine immortal?
@frogs33382 ай бұрын
Maybe there is no Anchor Being before the Anchor Being is born?
@michael87142 ай бұрын
Exactly my point
@marvel-uppermoon2 ай бұрын
Who said the anchor being needs to be human?
@denM-ey3vb2 ай бұрын
Wong is the anchor being. We don’t know how old Wong is. He has been the constant in all of the McU movies before and especially after Endgame.
@TristanHathaway2 ай бұрын
He was in exactly two movies before Endgame
@Ktranphoto2 ай бұрын
I tink you are wong
@ItsVizzle2 ай бұрын
He would have to die
@CreationSGame012 ай бұрын
Sounds lame
@JacobBen942 ай бұрын
you must be asian wanting to live through him haha
@rbtorelli19942 ай бұрын
Honestly, I think Fieige knew exactly what he was was doing in that interview, saying how happy he was that the term "ANCHOR Being" was used and asked about. We've already had Nexus beings in the form of the Scarlet witch, but Feige's clearly establishing that qn ANCHOR being is different... Only two have called Benedict Cumberbatch and his Doctor. Strange the anchor of the MCU going forward in the multiverse saga.... That's not a coincidence at all, he was absolutely foreshadowing this term and it's important with Doctor Strange
@h3llboyyy4072 ай бұрын
Tbh yeah because guess what? He can likely likely timetravel so maybe has already died in theory?
@BrianWhiting2 ай бұрын
Kang, Strange, or Loki being the anchor makes a lot more sense than the others. They both are major to the MCU and have key moments that could have caused the destruction sooner than later. Peter being one would be a nice idea but then him being blinked out and then back in should have fixed it.
@jokeronsteroids9532 ай бұрын
Thor is a great alternative if it’s supposed to be an avenger
@winnkey2 ай бұрын
with the sudden introduction of the fantastic four, you could do a major reality warp by Franklin Richards recreating all of reality, and him being the anchor being.
@dr_gizmo73542 ай бұрын
I think a great way to introduce Rdj as Doom would be to have the opening scene to be him killing the Kangs
@owet21842 ай бұрын
yes, have it be that doom discovers kangs plans after a version of him appears in his world
@Zenciiiii5 күн бұрын
That just sounds like it’s ripping off thanos
@srempert112 ай бұрын
I don’t think it’s any coincidence Feige called Strange an anchor.
@PeterInglis212 ай бұрын
Plus he was accused for the incursion.
@DariusssSaid2 ай бұрын
@@srempert11 They probably will claim it to be Strange. but i genuinely dont buy it lol
@philipansa45682 ай бұрын
The MCU has really struggled to properly define the rules of the multiverse. they've introduced several concepts: -Nexus Event (Loki) -Absolute Point (What If...?) -Nexus Being (Multiverse of Madness) -Anchor Being (Deadpool and Wolverine) -Canon Event (Spider-Verse, non MCU)
@ToySouljah.2 ай бұрын
considering the multiverse will all be coming crashing down by secret wars/doomsday I don't think it will matter anymore how confusing it is.
@Ultramagnetic8082 ай бұрын
A clever writer ( like Stephen McFeely ) will be able to come along and reconcile all those things together in a satisfying way that makes thematic sense.
@philipansa45682 ай бұрын
@@Ultramagnetic808 I hope so.
@valewalker12402 ай бұрын
Wouldn't canon events just be Miguel's own name for Absolute points?
@sideeggunnecessaryАй бұрын
- the sacred timeline/tree being in alioth's belly
@RattMumАй бұрын
I like the idea of Happy being the anchor, he's in most movies, he's of vague importance
@rusticbb82 ай бұрын
i thought the mcu timeline wouldn’t have an anchor because of how the mcu is like the sacred timelime and have so many of what would be anchor characters
@Oil_lover67232 ай бұрын
The anchor being is one of the soldiers protecting Tony stark
@IsaacG33132 ай бұрын
Airmen
@danielkim6722 ай бұрын
It is Tony’s bowl movement
@anonemous78812 ай бұрын
*Tony Stank
@bluegamemc14032 ай бұрын
I'm honestly not sure anyone at marvel even knows 😭
@xtv0-i8w2 ай бұрын
we do
@rantalmore2 ай бұрын
Obviously they do.
@SoddenFaTaL1ty2 ай бұрын
@@xtv0-i8wyou don't work for marvel 😂
@docdaytona1082 ай бұрын
And even if they do, it’s subject to change once or a dozen times between now and ‘Secret Wars.’ The MCU is a cluster right now, no two ways about it. They have about four years to get all the essential cables connected to the correct ports.
@wilmaso2 ай бұрын
Ppl who think Anchor Being is a real thing 😢😢
@lucho34102 ай бұрын
It's Peter from Deadpool! Every universe has one!!!
@pesotostylish2 ай бұрын
the scared universe, what if it’s so sacred it doesn’t need a single anchor being, however the main point of it is gathering up the best anchor beings from each universe and gathering them up, such as they tried to attempt to do with deadpool from 616.
@AuthentiXPodcast2 ай бұрын
The anchor being is such an interesting concept... I mean, the X-Men "reality" existed just fine before Logan was born, right? Probably for thousands of years. Why would an entire reality be tied to a mortal being who at some point in history will absolutely 100% die? Feels like an odd concept. I'm excited to see how they evolve on it.
@PATRICK-LEGER2 ай бұрын
Maybe Nick Fury? I mean, without him, there's no avengers or discovery of other people in the universe rather than earth? But idk if they'd do that with secret invasions flop
@StephenMangiulli2 ай бұрын
Title: We figured it out! - Last Sentence: Tell us who it is!??!
@alschaef132 ай бұрын
The anchor being is no doubt, Happy Hogan.
@Fish-pi8lv2 ай бұрын
“What’s your superpower? Parallel parking?”😂
@alschaef132 ай бұрын
@@Fish-pi8lv 🤣 Great line!
@novu61962 ай бұрын
Given how deadpool is basically omniscient, I found it weird that the "main" deadpool isn't his world's anchor being. He surely isn't the main character of the MCU, but he literally knows EVERYTHING (or at least could get a hold of ALL information through the power of... movies? Idk what the ability is called 🤣), even more than Dr. Strange or any other character; which makes you think that such an important character is supposed to be a side character in the grand scheme of things. I'd bet all my money on MCU deadpool, though I'd say it's a different story if that version is much more different than "Mainpool".
@group555_2 ай бұрын
With how meta deadpool & wolverine got. The anchor being is everyone who kept fans coming back to that universe. For x-men that was wolverine, when he died no one would really come back.
@meowski6172 ай бұрын
Maybe it’s Reed Richards. If one of the leaked plots of the latest Fantastic Four is them originally being from 616 but got displaced into another universe it would mean that the decay started in the 60s
@calebmahoney24482 ай бұрын
Franklin Richards makes a little more sense based on the powers. Going off your example of they aren’t in the 616 universe anymore, having the anchor being never being born in 616 might increase the pace of decay. Meaning Franklin will have to get all his comic book powers and restore order. Kinda like the analogy of a snake eating its tail.
@ashleypenhall79492 ай бұрын
I'm not here to nit pick but the fantastic four that is coming up is set in a alternate universe. Their universe is in a futuristic 60's setting. That earth will die, due to Galactus. (As seen) The future foundation will build the arc and reed will take his family and who ever he can to another universe....ie 616. He cannot be the anchor of the 616. Wanda is the best best for me.
@meowski6172 ай бұрын
@@ashleypenhall7949 Except you are nitpicking because I mentioned leaked plots that I saw which could be plausible since the movie is in production.
@meowski6172 ай бұрын
@@calebmahoney2448 That is true I didn’t think of Franklin!
@JocoLabs2 ай бұрын
Guys, anchor being is a deadpool joke. Wolverine was the anchor to all the fox xmen movies... every xmen movie was more like Wolverine and friends. So when he died off, so did the franchise.
@RidokouFC2 ай бұрын
I thought it'd be pretty obvious that the anchor being is Captain America. I'm actually really shocked no one mentioned him.
@SSJRadioBluth2 ай бұрын
It's obviously Cap. Dude was allowed to manipulate the multiverse and return because he's essential.
@MidnightSlasher2 ай бұрын
And he's been there since day 1
@lexxismarin40122 ай бұрын
Thank God someone who said it
@lexxismarin40122 ай бұрын
@@SSJRadioBluthkey issues said he'd talk about it.
@elishuster59432 ай бұрын
I was thinking it was either him Stark
@slightlydapperdwarf492 ай бұрын
Kang is a counqueror, and conquerors are tacticians. When would be the best time to take out his biggest threat? When they are down and wounded, i.e., after the events of Doomsday or Secret Wars, when our heroes are still reeling from their final battle with Doctor Doom. Kang knows all about time, it's likely he's travelling to a time when he sees himself having the greatest odds of success. I personally think this would be a better alternative than just scrapping his character entirely. I can see them setting up Battle World and God King Doom at the end of Avengers Doomsday, then having him defeated by the end, and having Kang step in as the final obstacle before the restoration of the Multiverse, and the reversal of Battle World.
@kinglouie3132 ай бұрын
As fun as any of these characters being the anchor being would be, it’s likely someone we haven’t seen on screen yet
@MeguVusion2 ай бұрын
Maybe the Sacred Timeline doesn’t need an Anchor Being but it is the only timeline that can cause Incursions. Which would affect other universes’ Anchor Beings. If Feige said Strange was an anchor for the MCU, it’s probably Strange.
@rebel21912 ай бұрын
Facts
@anonemous78812 ай бұрын
616 is NOT the only universe that can cause incursions. 838 Strange caused an incursion in MoM by dream walking
@MeguVusion2 ай бұрын
@@anonemous7881 where was the dream-walker? Wanda was on Earth
@anonemous78812 ай бұрын
@@MeguVusion Strange was the Dream Walker. Reed Richards explains it to 616 Strange. Thats why they killed him after they killed Thanos.
@VirajBaraskar2 ай бұрын
any universe can cause incursion
@TruForte4012 ай бұрын
ive always said the thing about Strange's viewing of the potential futures is he can only see futures up until his death so maybe beating thanos wasnt that rare it was just rare D.S survives, but him being the potential anchor being is intresting
@schofer15562 ай бұрын
Or maybe he is anchor being of 616 and that's why he can't do what his alternative did in Multivers of Madness because he saw that this will destroy his timeline
@papasmurf82752 ай бұрын
Anchor beings have to change often since none are immortal. Logan was only 200+ years old. This means that either that timeline branched off from the main timeline at his birth or there was another anchor being prior to his birth or him becoming the *Wolverine".
@amadeus.74362 ай бұрын
But the previous anchor being had to die, meaning the universe would collapse. It doesn't really make sense.
@garrettcanavan93082 ай бұрын
@amadeus.7436 I mean the assumption here is that universes really have the "before the anchor" time. From a meta perspective the fox Xmen universe only came into being with the first Xmen film. Same with the MCU and ironman.
@BuNnyDuDeDaRoO2 ай бұрын
Well it would mean wolverines parents are important since they birth the anchor being and the parents before them and so on. . .
@thugpug43922 ай бұрын
The way I imagine it is an anchor being either comes into being right before the universe was destined to die or any being of a significant enough "mysterious" purpose can become the anchor being. That "mysterious" purpose only being mysterious to the TVA because they can't break the 4th wall. It's like how at the end of Deadpool and Wolverine, the combination of them both saved the universe. They became relevant enough to hold up the universe on their own. RDJ Dr. Doom will probably be the next anchor being.
@edbouhl31002 ай бұрын
If a universe’s existence depends on an ‘anchor being’ (aka its marketability) - then the Creator has a twisted sense of humor.
@robertray10282 ай бұрын
I think it’s T’Challa, his death has the most impact that we have barely scratched the surface of.
@dannydecasas99962 ай бұрын
What is the cosmic significance of an anchor being? Why do they exist? Are they the universe personified in some form? Like maybe the MCU could merge the concept of eternity and an anchor being. Through this they would act as avatars or embodiments of their universe evolving from all the sentient life it has hosted, eventually becoming a being in some capacity.
@rynewhouse2 ай бұрын
Imagine it’s Hawkeye lolol
@cerebraltr67982 ай бұрын
There’s a reason Nat died for him 😂
@garyvu18902 ай бұрын
Wong
@cmailloux302 ай бұрын
Ulysses Claw😂…Baby don’t hurt me, no more
@Stardiplomaticincident2 ай бұрын
That’s the exact kind of thing Deadpool would do! 😂
@krijnheijnen54302 ай бұрын
Isn’t it more logical that the 616 universe does not have an anchor being, because the main mcu timeline is the ‘sacred timeline’. Maybe thats why our universe is non deletable or something
@szalaierik2 ай бұрын
Only sacred because Kang choose so
@MedroffYT2 ай бұрын
@@szalaierik still could be.
@liamfrr2 ай бұрын
@@MedroffYT kang doesnt dictate the laws of the universe
@TheBLSh0w2 ай бұрын
To canonize all the weird missteps of the multiverse saga on Tony Stark dying as a canon event of an anchor being is low key genius! It addresses it and they will take notes
@doublea1252 ай бұрын
I don't think it was Paradox who wanted the timeline erased. I think it was someone a little more calculating. Someone with a little more gravitas, capable of ushering in... doomsday...
@Fireball006Ай бұрын
What if the anchor being was Tony Stark so they try to bring him back from another universe and end up bringing Dr. Doom instead?
@jiffypoo50292 ай бұрын
Celestial Loki is a variant from a pruned branch timeline, 616 Loki is dead. He is on a higher plane of existence outside of reality.
@sideeggunnecessaryАй бұрын
That plane being inside alioth, who is in the void
@futuretrunks92572 ай бұрын
I think revealing that Stan Lee was a Watcher that went against rules to help the hero’s a bit for the future threat (Doom) would be cool as hell as the anchor being. Or it could just be Tony but I really want Stan Lee to be confirmed as a watcher that tried to help (Like the one from Ultimate Alliance 1 if anyone remembers that old game)
@kevinmelvin3952 ай бұрын
What if the anchor being was an an MCU Apocalypse that was killed thousands of years ago, possibly through a future time travel story. It could also be the "reason" why the mutants haven't been in the MCU
@kevinmelvin3952 ай бұрын
It could culminate in an time traveling extended bigger battle of earth being the reason why the multiverse opened up again after endgame.
@AshyLarry8885 күн бұрын
These videos reach sooooo hard Why are you all OBSESSED with knowing the plots of movies and every outcome before seeing them? It’s the epitome of doing it wrong
@CootiePootieTootie2 ай бұрын
I'm still so confused about Wade meeting up with Happy. I could have sworn they said that was in 616, but then they switched as if it was the same Deadpool. Can you do a video about that?
@TheDrexLord2 ай бұрын
I think cap could be the ancor being. He was the first canonical hero of the mcu (thor aside), and he also was key in a lot of major moments
@Spyalwayswins2 ай бұрын
I don’t think the MCU doesn’t have one as it is the main timeline and I don’t think it is supposed to die off
@garrettcanavan93082 ай бұрын
I wouldn't be surprised if in the end Loki somehow assumes the role of achor being. Allowing it to be some off screen being who is unlikely to die.
@pieceofgosa2 ай бұрын
The MCU writers have shown repeatedly that they are not handcuffed to concepts introduced by one writer, or group of writers. Yes, the 616 could have an anchor being but it could just as easily not have one.
@straightfaceeternity2 ай бұрын
this!
@garrettcanavan93082 ай бұрын
I mean sure... but they tend to stick with large concepts like this. Plus Feige was clearly happy that people are asking the question...
@pieceofgosa2 ай бұрын
@@garrettcanavan9308 Do they tend to stick with large concepts like this ? Such as what ? How the multiverse works has been changed at least a half a dozen times & I'd say that's the biggest concept ever introduced.
@Heavytripss2 ай бұрын
Yeah but they wouldn’t keep talking about anchor beings just for 616 to not have one .
@pieceofgosa2 ай бұрын
@@Heavytripss who keeps talking about them ?!!?
@Joec22x2 ай бұрын
Fun fact. They are called "nexus beings" in the comics, not sure why the name change but it is the scarlet witch in the comics.
@BigDeanoReviews2 ай бұрын
With the MCU being the sacred timeline I dont really think it has an anchor being since the sacred timeline seems to be endless compared to the other universes. Even the physical design of the sacred timeline we seen in Loki and the TVA shows it as a ring, it has no "end"
@docdaytona1082 ай бұрын
Anchor being is such a stupid concept. How did a universe exist and stay together for all the billions of years before their arrival? Why would one being’s existence cause a gradual decay of spacetime upon their passing, when they almost always have very finite lives? It was a plot device to bring Wolverine back for at least one more film, but beyond that, well, it kinda falls apart.
@stevil66692 ай бұрын
This concept is from the comic books. Not created for Deadpool and wolverine. I get what you're saying, but it wasn't just a random design just to sell movies, like you're implying, because it came from the secret wars comics.
@ttt98302 ай бұрын
It’s not that hard to understand. Before the anchor being was born doesn’t mean the universe falls apart. The reason for that is because The Anchor Being hasn’t died. Dead and Born are different. When family talks to you about times before your time they don’t say “Before you were dead” no they say “Before you were born”
@amadeus.74362 ай бұрын
@@ttt9830 It's still stupid. There's no logic behind it. They don't even bother trying to come up with a reasonable explanation as to why it works like it does.
@tomcoyle36092 ай бұрын
Completely agree
@BakingBadOBX2 ай бұрын
@@stevil6669 it still could be used from the comics for that purpose, and when used in the comics it is a pretty random design. and poorly thought ou
@xxmrtreyzxx2 ай бұрын
Maybe Nick fury ? Or maybe they have a multi anchor beings since it’s the sacred timeline
@ThePonDePon2 ай бұрын
I don't think just one person could be the anchor being, i think it depends on what the person is supposed to do in their timeline and whether or not they meet that goal, literally all of the avengers could be considered anchor beings
@flormonet2 ай бұрын
5:43 you had me in the first half 😂
@StarkKent-q3o2 ай бұрын
13:20 Jonathan Majors was an arrogant jerk but he was unfairly released as Kang by Disney/Marvel when we consider the fact the company didn’t care about public perception when it came to Paul Bettany
@xxWinterSpacexx2 ай бұрын
he’s innocent anyway. idk how he’s still out of job lol that trial is over already
@thezplayer30022 ай бұрын
@@xxWinterSpacexxthe trial is over because he was found guilty, he was sentenced to 52 weeks of a domestic violence intervention program and probation
@thezplayer30022 ай бұрын
he compared himself to robert downey jr, who was already on rehab for like decades ago and spent time on fixing himself
@Diaphanous.Achlys2 ай бұрын
@@thezplayer3002 the difference between him and rdj is rdj never hurt anyone but himself
@SherrickDuncan2 ай бұрын
Or Robert Downey Jr.
@PunkerMarth2 ай бұрын
i think it's honestly going to be strange. he's going to be so important moving forward and he's crucial for the story w/ doom.
@Saengard2 ай бұрын
It's the one person who so far has created incursions where 2 realities merge. So far, that's only been seen with Dr Strange
@cursebarklee412 ай бұрын
I bet Doom died in 616 due to some sort of accident or other and because of that Tony died as well. It’s possible that there are 2 anchors and if one or both die it’ll effect the universe is why there will be a Tony Stark/Doom lookalike lol
@furiousgamerxz5141Ай бұрын
I personally hope it’s not Dr. Strange, he’s already way to arrogant and cocky, instead I think it’s someone who’s long lived like Thor perhaps, I initially thought of God of Stories Loki but his timeline was pruned or maybe Thanos which would certainly be interesting.
@Kuhnai2 ай бұрын
It's actually Spiderman. All three Spiderman are the anchor being for their respective universes. This was the original script idea for Kang Avengers movie.
@SevenYearSacrifice2 ай бұрын
Wasn't it in Johnathan Major's contract that no one else could play Kang? All variants had to be played by him.
@rickkarrer83702 ай бұрын
I think Kang makes the most sense, as it’s his “Sacred Timeline”. It is entire timeline relied on someone else, he would’ve found a way to preserve them.
@hashtagselfie2 ай бұрын
This is a such a stupid guess considering he’s only been in one movie
@emmanuelmalcom64092 ай бұрын
How did Deadpool travel to the 616 for the interview with Happy?
@siddharthmovaliya79632 ай бұрын
I too want the answer to this question!!!
@SMunlimited2 ай бұрын
@@siddharthmovaliya7963 i think it was through cables time machine as this interview was just a bit after deadpool 2 and he even says he destroyed cables time machine after this interview when he gives up on everything
@rhodrage2 ай бұрын
How did he travel to Ryan Reynolds reading the GL script and the Origins timeline where he killed tha universes him. The answer is the same.
@emmanuelmalcom64092 ай бұрын
@@SMunlimited but the time travel device is just supposed to only allow you to move forward and backward in time not allow you to multiverse travel
@emmanuelmalcom64092 ай бұрын
@@rhodrage Fair
@umaruchan88282 ай бұрын
After Tony died MCU is struggling I guess RDJ is the anchor being for MCU and they brought him back. 😂😂😂
@cpsemple6 күн бұрын
The anchor beings will assemble 6 people who were touched by infinity stones (Star Lord-Power, Captain Marvel-Space, Wanda-Mind, Jane Foster(?)-Reality, Hawkeye-Soul, Dr. Strange-Time) and they will sacrifice themselves to resurrect the stones to defeat Doom.
@timfries72362 ай бұрын
Ravonna from Loki should be Kang's female doppleganger, like Sylvie and Loki. It would be a good wrap-up to their weird connection during season 2.
@nalaka34882 ай бұрын
What if Downey was kang? WAIT hear me out. We all so him in tropic thunder. If anyone can replace Jonathan majors it would be him
@pennywisethedancingclown2246Ай бұрын
Whaddya mean, *you people?*
@nalaka3488Ай бұрын
😂😂😂
@kevincagigas25142 ай бұрын
Disney's Agatha might be set during the Multiverse of Madness and a scene might take place where Agatha will appear last minute to save Wanda.
@saerohmajec70992 ай бұрын
I think what he meant by "a being of such vital importance" is a being that depending on their actions that universe with either thrive or die. If they die before they put their universe on the path that helps them thrive they take their universe down with them. The universe itself doesn't die simply because that person does but the events that happen after the anchor beings death lead to that universe being destroyed in one way or another.
@calito_nonya_buisness22632 ай бұрын
Hear me out, I think it’s Thanos Anyone that is multiple in the void I don’t think is an anchor. Casandra nova mention that they haven’t seen a wolverine in the void. And Wolverine is an anchor being. It’s just that version wasn’t supposed to be in the void Deadpool got him into a predicament. Back to the Thanos theory We saw Thanos from the first avengers. The first avengers brought together the universe. And after endgame some things weren’t the same. Thanos always said that he is inevitable and that Thanos was prime Thanos. Doctor Strange said that they only win one way so they beat all the odds and defeated when maybe they shouldn’t have since they did the only person so they have to save thanos
@vitocorleone12802 ай бұрын
I was waiting for you to say KANG!
@eastwood91702 ай бұрын
If they make Kang the anchor being, then have Cable be the one who kills him, then you can introduce Cable coming "back" to fix what he started, the incursion
@bellcurve02 ай бұрын
Kang as the anchor being… people would straight riot. Lets just be happy folks seem to be on board again with marvel movies from the deadpool goodwill.
@Lypiros2 ай бұрын
Just an additional information, when the avengers goes back to the past, and Loki asked why aren't they being arrested by the TVA, Ravonna answered that it was suppose to happen. Meaning to say that it could possible that Stark was suppose to die to save that universe, so that also supports that Tony isn't the anchor being despite carrying the victory so many times.
@OfficialMangekАй бұрын
Anchors keep something "Anchored" to something else, the main timeliness doesn't have an Anchor being, it's the MAIN time line, the line all other timeliness are anchored to. I believe Anchor beings are the beings that caused timeline splits and originally would have been the ones pruned (Like Loki for example) and their universe plays out the story of how things would have been. So once they die, their story no longer needs to be told so the Universe withers away.
@botz772 ай бұрын
Huh, I thought the thing with Thor was just a joke. Now I'm thinking Deadpool might be in the next Thor movie. Which kind of works with how silly and weird the Thor films have become.
@Jc-fp2im2 ай бұрын
I don’t think there is a anchor being for the 616 universe because it’s the sacred timeline it’s never supposed to end
@MrCake-ui8uo2 ай бұрын
Kang chose it to be the sacred time line..
@Jc-fp2im2 ай бұрын
@@MrCake-ui8uo now that you say that I vaguely remember that and now I gotta go rewatch Loki
@terrygallo89992 ай бұрын
That’s why it’s loki
@andrewbogard24112 ай бұрын
@terrygallo8999 that's what I was thinking, loki died in endgame but a version of him was brought into the 616 universe, so I think it is loki as he is literally the anchor being holding the timeline together
@RJDough13132 ай бұрын
well its spiderman if were going by the script that was scrapped apparently....
@Herdatec2 ай бұрын
The comics already had the concept of anchor beings. And in there every universe had multiple anchor beings. These were characters that exist in every universe. The scarlet Witch and Spiderman are some of those that are explicitly named beings of importance. So there can be more than one.
@grahamg7456Ай бұрын
Odin would be a strong contender for anchor being. Odin's death represents more than just the loss of a king-it symbolizes the removal of a key stabilizer in the fabric of the universe. His awareness of cosmic artifacts like an infinity gauntly, power over Asgard and its enemies, and connection to larger cosmic events make him the ultimate "anchor being." Without his presence, the universe begins to unravel-Ragnarok destroys Asgard, Thanos wipes out half of all life, and ancient beings like the Celestials and gods meet their demise. Thus, Odin’s existence was critical to maintaining the timeline and cosmic order, and his death set the stage for universal chaos and decay.
@stevecooke542 ай бұрын
I think Thor deserved an investigation. He spans the universe, Oden told him he would be more powerful than himself, he just saved all gods, perhaps Loki was confused about which brother was destined for glorious purpose! 😊
@brandonyoung-kemkes11282 ай бұрын
I always wondered why Doctor Strange was playing with water when he could’ve easily froze it during endgame. Maybe he is the anchor being.
@luckycatdad83692 ай бұрын
The sacred timeline doesn't need an Anchor being, but if it did, it would likely be Reid Richards, or maybe Dr. Strange.
@naymyoaung20252 ай бұрын
Everyone’s a gangster until it’s revealed that Thanos was the anchor all along lol It’d be so funny 😂😂😂
@Kal20El2 ай бұрын
Loki is literally the Anchor Being of the entire Marvel.