NO, Tracks and Channels are NOT the same. Here's why.

[@eltata16]

Every time he says "this is Gregor from Presonus" an angel smiles

[@beatweezl]

It's "Giga" from Presonus.

[@buckycore]

Bro, he is an angel

[@buckycore]

I love how the multi channel instruments are handled in StudioOne. I'm dyslexic and those extra tracks confuse the hecks out of me in the past

[@sarahtonin4649]

Every time he says it, I say, "Uh, what?!"

[@brentonkelly3780]

And so do we….he’s so passionate and informative!

[@beatkultr]

The passion from Gregor is on 🔥 🔥🔥! He’s fed up with the nonsense and want y’all to see the true power behind our platform. Some people not getting it🤦🏽‍♂️🤦🏽‍♂️🤦🏽‍♂️. I LOVE THIS ENERGY! #TEAMGREGOR Let’s go!!!

[@presonus]

🙏🔥 -GBY

[@presonus]

Hey Everyone, many of you mentioned that you can also link a Bus Channel to a Folder Track. This is of course 100% correct and I've added an info card at the top right linking to another video where I've covered this. This video here was meant more as a "philosophical" introduction to the whole concept, explaining why we went with a different approach than most other DAWs to begin with.

[@cdthompsonmusic]

Just got serious about using S1 recently upgrading to the Pro version. I absolutely love this short, very clear and easy to follow video! Outstanding job here.

[@philippemarne1793]

Thanks for this uplifting explanation, Gregor! Useful, clear and pedagogic as always 2:55 could well become a meme...

[@piemanmusic]

Just started working on studio one yesterday after about 20 years in pro tools. This took me for a spin when I was trying to figure out what was going on. I had a channel, but no associated track to start writing on. This video is so timely.

[@iTalhera]

Bro seriously, you have and are helping me so much! I just want all the presonus family to know that I'm very grateful. Much love and respect from Brasil ❤️

[@presonus]

🙏 Thank you so much for your kind comment! Really appreciate it. -GBY

[@JohnDeCarteretElvis]

Thanks Gregor, that put me staright. I've come from Cubase and upon finding the Busses missing I paniced and turned them on. It never occurred to me that I didn't requiree them, though I was always complaining that they were in the way! Now they're gone and I don't worry about them or complain that they're in the way. Thanks, love your videos... One happy chappie...

[@DeoMasterProduction]

ABSOLUTELY ! This is the best way. Cause as soon as you get like 100 tracks to mix , having a lot of bus tracks in the arrangement view can quickly become annoying.

[@raydawgggtrismegistus]

While this is an old video, this feature isn't the separation I was looking for. As you stated, in a traditional studio, the DAW is separate from the channel strips on the mixing console. Yet all DAWs sync the editor & mix view track positions, which is inaccurate. In a traditional studio, you can send a track signal to whichever channel strip you like, regardless of it's track position in the DAW. For example, If my guitar is the first track in my DAW, I can send the signal to channel strip 5 or 12 on the console , and it stays the first track in my DAW. It doesn't move up or down to another track position. With DAWs, when you move the guitar track position up or down, in the edit view, it moves it's position up or down on the mixer as well. I don't want them synced. I would like the ability to arrange my mixer channel strip positions, independently from my track/edit view positions, like they are in a traditional studio. Is there is a way to do this in Studio One? In the Studio you don't "create" channel strips with tracks. Your console all ready has a predetermined number of channel strips, and you decide where you're going to route signal..

[@sarahtonin4649]

One of the reasons I switched to Studio One. It's also more analogous to a traditional recording studio, where the tracks are on the tape machine, and the channels are on the mixer.

[@JohnDeCarteretElvis]

Same here. I feel at home having worked with tape. Studio One feels like it fits like a glove!

[@JeighNeither]

Same. I knew I was home when I saw that S1 decoupled them.

[@2free2snakes]

This video helped me fix a remix of an old track, planned future release. The more I get in to S1, the more I discover good things about it. I will purchase the pro version of 5 when my trial ends.

[@alfonsorusso84]

What an energy from Gregor! Top DAW!

[@massi8586]

Thanks, needed this.

[@MrSiwat]

Yes, I'm happy with that decoupling. I use it all the time and never give it a thought. Keeps things tidy. Gotta say, having used Abelton for the last 12 years & coming to Studio One just last year, I absolutely love it. Runs like a dream and sounds excellent. The time stretch quality is super good and the whole system is very quick and stable. Just spent the last 5 hours messing with Impact and Mai Tai which I love. The built in instruments plus some U-he synths and Vital is all you need.) Thanks for the the videos. Always really helpful.)

[@presonus]

So glad to read that! Thank you. -GBY

[@MrSiwat]

Thanks Gregor. Your videos have been a great help in making the transition to Studio One. I'm loving the Sphere membership and all the stuff that comes with it. The vintage master bus plugins are a joy and Notion is a great way to improve your music reading. I'll be putting some stuff up on exchange at some point soon. Cheers and all the best!

[@daviddutkewich731]

I first saw this was an option when I was making a beat in Impact and I saw all the bus channels in the mixer. This video was great at explaining why. Thanks!

[@marcomonchi9396]

GREGOR ANY TIME WE SEE YOU YOU ARE A SURPRISE...IN THINGS WE KNOW ANY TIME YOU GIVE US A NEW VISION , AND WE GET SOMETING WE LOOSE THANKS FOR YOUR WORK

[@presonus]

Thank you so much, Marco! You're too kind. 🙏 -GBY

[@JeighNeither]

I used Cubase/Logic for a couple years before I came to PreSonus, & one of the reasons I made the switch is because the workflow was set up this way. I had many internal conversations w/myself about how much better the workflow & space mgmt would be w/o busses in tracking window, so when I saw the way Studio One manages it, I knew I was home ❤

[@LukaPanik]

Your workflow. I like it to be visible in both track and channel view.

[@presonus]

Then you should use the preference “create Automation Tracks for Bus and FX Channels” as shown in the video. Studio One facilitates both workflow philosophies! :) -GBY

[@4EV-ER]

I like to keep my drums on different tracks to have different length loop elements and introduce variations. Of course Studio 1 allows for this too via folders and I can still have a nice tidy view of it without cluttering my main arrangement when I don’t work on it. I’ve looking for something like this for ages. Finally a DAW that gets this right 😊

[@michelvanderlinde4026]

Also when using a multiple instrument track (multiple instruments layered on one track), you will get mixer channels for the individual instruments, but also one for the layered instrument. Furthermore I want to add that in the mixer overview you can also hide channels if you want. I love this feature, because the artist in me has overview in the arrangement with no clutter, and the engineer part of me can go wild afterwards when mixing.

[@ClintCurtis]

I always use folders, and then turn those folders into a bus.

[@rudeboys28712]

same here, I love folders to hide tracks I'm not working on.

[@JohnDeCarteretElvis]

And then you have to wait, then two come along at once! :-)

[@johneeadbl5876]

That IS an interesting concept: separate controls for each individual drum from the track/kit. However, I use Notion to write my drum parts (: just as I use Notion to write everything else! :), then, I EQ and compress kick, snare, and cymbals (mostly hi hat) to my preferences after sending audio to Studio One 6 (and 5, as 5 will still ReWire to Notion which I love for practice). I'm kinda sorta "old school", I guess... been reading notation for 63 years, don't like electronica, prefer a '60s sounding kit, yada yada.... But, between Gregor and Joe Gilder, I'm in "instructional video heaven"! Keep up the good work guys; with a cataract in my "stronger" reading eye (other one's fuzzy), I'm increasingly watching videos and decreasingly reading manuals in *.pdf on a 32" monitor (no room for the 40" in the present setup and the Apple (intel) Mac gets too warm running three video streams along with dozens of DAW tracks and channels. Anyone wanna donate me a new M2 Mac mini? No?! Well, OK!) L8r dewds

[@TibobDeNazareth]

You are soooooo goood explaining stuff

[@lmpcrew]

Thanks Buddy for your quick responses, always appreciated ✊🏾💪🏿

[@moritzsur997]

2:09 i Love it because you can do your full Mix from the arrangerwindow

[@presonus]

why even have a Mixer view then...:D But to each their own! That's what's great about Studio One - You CAN display every Channel in your Arrangement, if that's what you want to do. It's just that you don't HAVE to. -GBY

[@MondstaubMusik]

As i make group folders for drums/synths/vox ect. i also do assign the folder track of a group a bus channel which will be represented in the arrangement view as folder track& as a bus channel in the mixer view.Any automation i make will be on that folder track/bus channel, hence it has information relevant to the song itself and it makes sense for me to keep it in the arrangement view.

[@presonus]

sure - but I'm sure you have way more bus channels in your projects that are not linked to a folder, or that aren't being automated. Why should you have those clutter up your song arrangement view? -GBY

[@mrdanielammon]

@@presonus One reason would be to change the volume of a bus/vca/fx/aux without having to open the mixer. It is of course another story when you got a Hardware controller, where you might (only) show those tracks. But even without the controller: I'd still prefer creating bus/vca/fx automation tracks automatically (which does not work for aux channels btw!) , then I at least know that there are no unexpected (but according to the settings logically correct) channel order changes as many people observed them in the past if not done so.

[@kpuliatch]

Thanks Gregor - Looking into purchasing a DAW, and your tips and best practices are very helpful to make an informed decision.

[@JohnDeCarteretElvis]

Studio One, Studio One, Go Sphere, Go Sphere!

[@moablivebr]

hey please send me this color scheme you are using in this tutorial please

[@titusrivers5059]

The last point got me 💯

[@stephenmcnamara9928]

Gregor: Great video as always, though it's worth highlighting for this introduction that the "Pack Folder" command for various audio tracks, combined with "create a bus" (I believe it's called) for the folder track allows automation on the folder track when you want to open the automation lanes and edit. I sense this fantastic part of S1 gets overlooked a bit.

[@presonus]

Hi Stephen, you're absolutely right and I've shown this in many of my videos on this topic. This video was meant more as a "philosophical" explanation as to why we went with a different approach here than most other DAWs. -GBY

[@stephenmcnamara9928]

@@presonus Gregor: Thanks for the reply and I now see the "philosophical" point of the video -- yours are always so chock-full of info I was distracted by that!

[@bobdeyoung7261]

In DP just unselect tracks that you don't want visible in tracks view, mix view or sequence editor. Each can be different or the same by using the track selector.

[@LordAssassinLych]

I would also add the possibility to connect bus channel with a folder to this tutorial. That is quite handy and relevant as well.

[@presonus]

Absolutely - I've done several videos about this and I'm going to add an info card linking to it. In this video, I wanted to focus more on the overall concept behind all this, and why not having a 1:1 relationship between Tracks and Channels could potentially be a desirable thing in the first place. -GBY

[@officialhardnox]

@presonus I have a question, when i delete a midi note in the editor it deletes the actual track too, so i set a keyboard shortcut of "|" for deleting a midi not so it doesnt conflict, is there a way that i can still use the delete button to delete midi notes without having it delete the track?

[@Rybson666]

About having bus/fx in the arrangement area: I have to use it that way, because it's the only way to have it visible in import song data - ugly bug.

[@luanlopes4054]

It's an old bug and they haven't fixed yet unfortunately

[@presonus]

Hi Rybson, this is because Song Data Import has been designed as a Track based import in order to allow importing event & automation data from other Songs. Hopefully we can add Channel import functionality to it as well at some point in the future. -GBY

[@eddiepedrosa3805]

this was so helpful!! this was one of the things confusing me when I switched from pro tools

[@edouardphilippe5271]

Is there a way to add multiple busses and FX channels at once like adding mono or stereo tracks???

[@perrythomasmusic3709]

Gregor, I couldn't agree more, which is why I use Presonus Studio One in the first place.............it's more intuitive and logical than most DAWs

[@davelongenecker649]

Oh man, great info! 4:28

[@axkldhg3]

When are we getting a video track(s)? Draggable playhead? Surround?

[@DavidValles]

Tomorrow

[@ferien-auf-ruegen]

What has this to do with this video? ...nothing...

[@hendricksam]

Eye opening Gregor! Thank you!!!

[@TheBiggerNoise]

I wonder if having worked with a separate mixer and tape deck makes it easier to get your head around this.

[@presonus]

100%! -GBY

[@DiegoPalominorodriguez]

Hi, I have a great doubt about it, when I export stms assuming some beat, and I have organs and keyboards in a channel bus with some effect, when importing the stms to a new project, these effects do not appear printed in the audio signal. what is the proper way to export it?

[@mixprofmix]

Would love to have an option to link up both the channel pan and send pan together on the console. Saying anytime I move my track pan knob, it will automatically move any sends pan on the channel. Like that of many DAWs

[@JohnDeCarteretElvis]

Please,name one because I came from Cubase and it certainly didn't do that. Then again if it's a stereo send you shouldn't need to pan it because the pan control automatically moves the audio and thats the angle at which it will go through the send. Surely!

[@muhamedaliismaili]

I love Studio One just for this.

[@JimJWalker]

This is one of my favorite features that I never thought about, but yes it is great!

[@MrDJSTRATEGY]

Ok here is my issue as a hip hop producer. I do a beat i buss my drums then add my filters/glitch effects to that buss to effect that group when I want. (Breaks/drops) when artist needs a track out to get mixed after recording. I send stems for everything. Now those effects I put on the buss are left out. The stems. I'm trying to figure this out with out putting my glitch effects vst on every drum channel.

[@Bezowinz]

Please add the ability to put the multi-out channels of virtual instruments in folders in the Console. Organization of channels/console is lacking compared to tracks/arranger.

[@studioonetutorials]

This is already possible by wrapping it into a Multi Instrument. That way you can very conveniently expand the single channels of the Multi Instrument inside the console.

[@Bezowinz]

@@studioonetutorials thanks for the work around, but multi instruments often hide my instances of Komplete Kontrol, defeating its purpose. And the ability to do this without creating multi instruments would be more efficient/convenient. But this is probably why many of these smaller upgrades will never be made. Users are ok with these work arounds, maybe taking advantage of their primary uses. On the QA page, I suggested having multi outs saving with presets. No one supported it, telling me to use multi instruments or musicloops. I have no need for these features outside of their side benefits.

[@studioonetutorials]

​@@Bezowinz I see your point. Talking about multi outs: Did you try creating Instrument+FX presets? We improved recalling multi outs in Studio One 5.2 so you should now be able to save and recall all multi outs of an instrument (including names, volume, panning and inserts).

[@Bezowinz]

@@studioonetutorials I will try the Instrument+FX presets. That would do the trick. Thanks!

[@studioonetutorials]

@@Bezowinz Let me know if it works for you!

[@louiewgroenewald]

This is a bitof a wierd to get used to, coming from other DAW, but I think it is a great way to work. as soon as you get used to it. It looks cleaner while working and I can actually start using the mixer more than I used to in other DAW.

[@philipjoshua274]

Very Helpful Thank you...😍😍💛💛

[@TheSummersProject]

please help me! I'm struggling to get a signal from my midi keyboard/synth.. i have them connected but can'tt get it to play through to capture duo (also tried garageband) no signal is coming through.. wires are working... i'm using a roland jupiter xm,.. what am i doing wrong? should i just sell my iTwo?

[@JW-lx2qe]

I have the habit of mixing/adding fx to the bus channels while composing, so my bus channels are present in the arrangement. But I'm curious if this workflow would work for me.

[@charlottemcmillan9668]

I’m new to Studio One, and this was helpful. My question is, is there a way to have control over individual channel volume in a multi-timbral instrument like Kontakt - without having to arrange multiple audio outs out of that instance? In DP and Cubase, you can control the volume of each loaded instrument in Kontakt via the respective midi track/channel. It’s not necessary to set up Kontakt with multiple audio outs. Is there a way to do this in Studio One?

[@Detroitdogg]

I have the opposite issue. I have a mix channel that has no associated track, but am unable to delete it. How do I get rid of it?

[@iamtheimagedoctor]

Nice new look with DOF

[@Lars.H.Pedersen]

Well i would prefer to have the same numbers of tracks in the arranger as channels in the mixer. But i can´t seem to find out how to do it. Each time i drag the Impact into a Instrument track it opens 5 channels in the mixer. I wan´t only one. Any help here. I normaly use 7 different drumtracks. So i just want 7 channels in the mixer showing these 7 tracks.

[@rocnred]

In the old analog tape days, we knew Tracks on Tape and Channels on Console. Probably confusing today since there is no more tape and no more consoles 😥

[@AlOne-xg6dv]

Convincing explaination. Maybe it would be useful to have some kind of visual hierarchy in the mixing part for example Impact XT having more than one channel inside one track, or for bus. The display type could be selected (hierarchy type or actual default mixing view). This would allow to have the best of both worlds.

[@thebasspapa]

Gregor in "RAGE" :-)...danke, sehr gut erklärt .

[@presonus]

hahaha! -GBY

[@wienerzyclus]

Very nice feature indeed Gregor but when you open the "import song data" window they should be available all the channels that are in the mixer and not the tracks.This is a real PITA for any of us use this hugely useful function.

[@presonus]

Hi, this is because Song Data Import has been designed as a Track based import in order to allow importing event & automation data from other Songs. Hopefully we can add Channel import functionality to it as well at some point in the future. -GBY

[@tonyrapa-tonyrapa]

Totally agree and I love this default behaviour in SO.

[@OverlookeDEnT]

Can you just FOLDER all those BUS tracks? Also, is there a way to have the "automation" tracks appear if a BUS is already in the Project? Not just NEWLY created channels?

[@presonus]

Yes and yes. You can add automation tracks for already existing buses by simply right clicking their fader and selecting "edit automation". Or do the same with any other parameter on that bus that you want to automate. Once your bus channels have an automation track, you can folder those automation tracks and then select "Link Visibility of Track List and Console" in the Mixer options. As you now open and close the folder, you will see that all the bus channels within are being shown/hidden in both the Song as well as the Mixer. -GBY

[@OverlookeDEnT]

@@presonus thanks for the info and great vid!

[@KRTeutsch]

I get the feeling Gregor feels strongly about this.

[@studioonetutorials]

Of course, after all, this question comes up almost daily on social media ;-)

[@JohnDeCarteretElvis]

Shouldn't we all, there's no better DAW. After all it's the DAWING OF A NEW AGE!

[@stevemann_music]

It was this decoupling of MIDI data and sound generators that more than anything else made me move from Sonar to Studio One.

[@joepalladino4323]

How do you override this behavior? I have a song with two different Instrument tracks outputting to the same Instrument. I want separate channels for each so I can mix them individually, but currently they are both represented by the same mixer channel. Thanks!

[@presonus]

Hi, you'd have to duplicate the Instrument Track with the "duplicate (complete)" command. -GBY

[@krebsie714]

Thank you for this explanation. I understand what you are trying to get across. The question I have would you not like to have the master channel displayed in the song view since you can add compression and limiter to it or am I missing something more?

[@presonus]

That''s the thing - you can show ANY channel in your song arrangement if you want to. It's just that you don't HAVE to. -GBY

[@krebsie714]

@@presonus I don’t see how to display the master channel in the song arrangement view.

[@methodofkolishin]

@@krebsie714 Right click on the master fader in the mixer and hit "automate volume", this will automatically show the master channel in the arranger. :)

[@krebsie714]

@@methodofkolishin Thanks that worked. Thanks again

[@theoriginalheartstrummer]

Ok, but how to easily get the mixing channels up for software instruments that have more than one instrument? When I use kontakt the different parts are just on one fader, despite having their own tracks in the arranger.

[@chaddonal4331]

You have to add the outputs first in Kontakt -- and save that configuration. Reboot S1 and the NEXT time Kontakt loads you will have the additional outputs. THEN you add your instruments. (Unintuitive. Took a couple hours for me to solve via various videos).

[@presonus]

If you use the VST3 version of Kontakt, it's much easier @chaddonal4331 :). Then you can simply follow these steps here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/oZ64iJqceZdgj8k -GBY

[@PhantomDave68]

Thanks for making these vids, they help a lot.

[@newtonlkh]

I hate it when I finally pulled up an instance of Tmpact XT to do some quick drum demo, pull down the "Track" fader, and only some (the snare??) of the elements ducks in volume. I hate this every time. I only used impact XT as quick and easy way to get some drums going, this independence is what I didn't want. If they share the same mixer channel, to seperate them would not be too hard, just copy several intances of the track and the instrument, and mute anything other than the element I need for that specific track.

[@Tx66]

Just change the outputs to 1x stereo and set it as your Impact XT default preset. Problem solved.

[@sysmch]

Excellent explanation, thanks!

[@igorbeuk6298]

I am older expirensed Producer do from Cubase I find Studio One very familiar actually I used all DAW's except Logic but I want to say that I'm really happy how Nektar P1 is integrated same as with Cubase and after some time P1 will be easier than mouse clicks. Ableton in my opinion have best Work View , it's clean and open space is really effective but it's not necessary, old school UI is not obstacle

[@beatweezl]

Wait a minute... Can't you just hide the bus tracks using your track manager? Also, if you did turn of automatically create automation track for channel, if I later wanted to created an automation track for said channel, I can just create it manually from whatever parameter and it will show up in the song arrangement window, right? Why would I disable automatically create automation track if I can just easily hide it from the track manager?

[@toolondaboards]

We should have the option to work with or without the “clutter” in the arrange view. I like the 1:1 ratio.

[@presonus]

There is a preference for that in the advanced Automation Preferences. If you prefer 1:1, it is right there! :) -GBY

[@toolondaboards]

@@presonus Thank you!

[@santisoza1364]

Can anyone help me with creating channels for instruments? I've tried looking this up online but I'm not understanding. So I want to have one channel for every instrument track. For example, if I have 4 different patches of Eastwest Opus, I would like 4 different channels in my console. One for each patch. I would also like each patch to be all on the same MIDI channel. Can anyone help me with this?

[@sylzysylzerz7887]

You are one hell of a cool dude man

[@JUWOLS]

I dont use the Mixer View really, cause I have a FaderPort. But great info, just in case I dont want to see a bus channel!

[@petersvan7880]

Thank you Gregor, this all makes a lot of sense.

[@ToXball]

Studio One is my love!

[@presonus]

❤️ -GBY

[@rishabhkamal2865]

Besttt software for music production... #loveyourworkgregor&joe

[@zazoomatt]

Stellar Example as NOW I am on the right TRACK. Mixing uses BUSSES for Proper Blending after the arrangement is leveled with pre-Fader DB Gain Staged.

[@brooksbohmbach1]

My only problem with the bus channels is they’re never locked within the folder I want. They wind up being re arranged all the time

[@presonus]

Hi, have you clicked in the dropdown menu of the Folder Track in the Track List to link it to the desired Bus Channel? -GBY

[@AliEsfahaniMusic]

I love Studio One Forever....

[@DCPImages]

Ok Thanks, Gregor. Now a summary video about routing tracks to channels, please :-)

[@presonus]

Check it out: kzbin.info/www/bejne/qZC5kGpto8ecr68 -GBY

[@khaikim_]

i mean you could use it for automating levels for all the tracks listed on the bus

[@GadesChannel]

Gregor for Studio One is like Dom for Cubase :D

[@nealthompson404]

I like the official Reaper guy. He sounds like if anybody ever interrupted his lesson, he'd get pissed off and suddenly turn into Joe Pesci in a mobster movie and say something like "You talkin to me? Whadda you smilin about? What's so funny?"

[@GadesChannel]

@@nealthompson404 Are you talking about "The REAPER blog"? ;)

[@nealthompson404]

No. REAPER Mania. Maybe he's not the "official" Reaper guy.

[@georgenext3030]

@@nealthompson404 He is officially working for cockos

[@fingerhorn4]

I get this. It's sensible. What is NOT sensible however, is that Studio One, as well as many other DAWS, make midi tracks using exterior synths/workstations so complicated? In the "old" days, you could create a midi track and AUTOMATICALLY a mixer channel would appear. The faders were almost the same as for an audio channel except the fader commanded MIDI Volume and a host of other useful commands. There was no need to "mix down", or render, or "bounce". The midi track would reside along the other mixer channels and broadly behave in the same way. But now, everyone has to create AUX channels, or render, or bounce, or mix down. THIS SHOULD NOT BE NECESSARY. In this regard DAWS have gone backwards, not forwards. Why has this happened. Midi data is perfectly capable of using a fader or mix channel to change midi volume, expression, panning, after touch and a host of other useful controls. You should not have to render down to audio to get mix controls. It is a backward step.

[@methodofkolishin]

Hmm I might be missing something here, and I apologize if so- but it sounds like what you're looking for is the instrument track. (these tracks do midi and audio at the same time, so you can process VST's without needing to bounce if you don't want to- or have the system resources to not need to.) Additively, IDK if this is possibly adding to the confusion (because this still confuses me in S1) but when creating an instrument track- if you were to delete the channel, it goes away while still leaving the instrument itself loaded in the "instrument" panel of the mixer. Instead you MUST select "delete channel and instrument" when removing un-needed instrument tracks. This is where a 1:1 philosophy makes things less confusing IMO :D

[@jonesy_b]

I always use folders and add a buss on the folder, its way cleaner

[@daaaMook]

I do this too, but after watching this video, I might re-think that approach. I think I would prefer to keep my tracks and channel views separate.

[@moranast]

I've been doing it this way since Studio one 3 ..It is a more intuitive way of mixing and making music

[@garyshepherd9226]

Thanks Gregor - slightly mad professor hair !

[@ayymacarena788]

2:25 umadbro? =P

[@eskildabelseth]

So… why wouldn’t you just hide the bus track while you don’t need it? I don’t understand why this is a big deal. Love the program though! When you start supporting surround sound, preferably with Dolby Atmos support, I’ll be able to use it for more professional work!

[@arishojaiee6483]

Is it true that with studio one the amount of audio tracks are unlimited

[@Whopcap]

Straight 🔥🔥🔥

[@KRMoore731]

Jeeeeez Thank you sir this is very helpful :-)

[@vsp237]

Excellent !

[@herrunsinn774]

This is yet another reason I am glad I am a solo guitar player. Life (and mixing) is so much more simple that way. 😅 😂 🤣

[@causeno1048]

This is actually one of the things that sold Studio One for me.

[@justhazza3068]

the only thing that really piss me off, its the unlinked solo-mute between mixer and arrangement

[@Jamison_IO]

Here is one of his other videos on this topic for those interested. kzbin.info/www/bejne/qZC5kGpto8ecr68

[@TheToneWork]

So helpful! Thank you! More reasons S1 is superior!