Mr. Andrew is so articulate. You can see how passionate he is about wine with the sharpness of his words and the depth of his explanations.
@NoSediment6 күн бұрын
It is true, amazing conversation partner! 🥂
@Deb19Egan5 күн бұрын
I enjoyed this conversation so much. Thank you for giving us access to not only your own knowledge and observations, but also the deep knowledge and insights of Nords and Jefford.
@NoSediment5 күн бұрын
Thank You. I was starstruck myself. Nords and Aigars have such a deep knowledge and understanding of wine, it was my absolute pleasure to be with them and discuss these topics. 🙏🏻
@carlcadregari77686 күн бұрын
Awesome conversation. Every experienced and new wine drinker needs to see this. “Fine wine are those shared by fine people.” What a fantastic thought. Time, terroir and wine. What a great combination. Thank you.
@NoSediment6 күн бұрын
Thank You, very happy You enjoyed it. 🙏🏻
@wiskaki24Күн бұрын
I love this episode. Great to see a wine from my home country of Australia. Giaconda Chardonnay is world-class.
@panaceiasuberes64645 күн бұрын
Best upload ever in the channel's history and probably it's first 1M views vid one year from now.
@NoSediment5 күн бұрын
You are too sweet! 🍷
@jorgenmillton11663 күн бұрын
An absolutely wonderful conversation, just love your podcast interviews. Both Andrew Jefford & Aigars Nords were perfect regarding this subject. I think this is important to show people that fancy chateaus and high prices are not the key factors to be a fine wine. Keep up your good work! Another question, are you finnished with your studies to become a MW yet?
@NoSediment2 күн бұрын
Thank You! 🙏🏻 unfortunately no, I will have to sit the exam next year again. I want to say I knew it (very few pass with first go), but receiving the news was still crushing. 🥺 hopefully next summer. I am already dedicated to studying again.
@jorgenmillton11662 күн бұрын
@@NoSediment, thanks for your reply. I can only wish you good luck and I 'm positive that you will get it next time :)
@ambtenaar6 күн бұрын
Really enjoyed this conversation. Great interview!
@NoSediment6 күн бұрын
Thank You, me too. I was happy to be with these people and listen to them discussing this topic. 🥂
@chemepharmd764 күн бұрын
These interviews introduce me to great wine personalities. It was nice to see Andrew back and a delight to see Aigars for the first time. The conversation could have lasted another hour and it would still have seemed too short.
@NoSediment4 күн бұрын
Thank You, very sweet of You! 🙏🏻
@nicoantuna14546 күн бұрын
Great content! I love these types of conversations
@NoSediment6 күн бұрын
Thank You, this was aim. And .. I love to be part of these conversations.
@davidlittle66215 күн бұрын
Love this interview series you are doing!
@NoSediment5 күн бұрын
Thank You, I will try to keep them up! 👌
@Colin-o9b6 күн бұрын
Agnese you're 197 points out 100 ❤ 🍷🥂🍾
@danfarmer67306 күн бұрын
Very nice discussion, Thank you
@NoSediment6 күн бұрын
Thank You! 🥂
@melguilb45085 күн бұрын
Ack! Im looking at 3 bags of apples justvpicked i can barely carry... its cider time and unlike previous years im way busier and so is all my typical help!!! Thanks for wine talk over breaky! Love the coffee table scene
@danielmagg60965 күн бұрын
The format of moderated discussion is interesting, something you could maybe do more often?
@NoSediment5 күн бұрын
That is something I want to do more often for sure. The only issue is to get all these amaizing people at one spot and agree to spend 2h filmig! 🍿
@danielmagg60965 күн бұрын
@NoSediment travel to meet them?
@michaelgourlay17466 күн бұрын
‘Fine’ is the better part of anything.
@NoSediment6 күн бұрын
Well said. The next question is what makes a better wine? 🍷 😂😂😂 I did have several interviews that touched upon this subject as well. 🥂 Cheers!
@mickeylee26245 күн бұрын
Great discussion! The idea of having being able to appreciate "perfection" or the peak of wine/food should definitely not prevent us from enjoying more casual and less refined versions in their own right. Having experienced the quality beef in the world (i.e. Hanwoo) prepared in the ideal conditions (i.e. grilled over charcoal overlooking the Han River) does not prevent me from enjoying far less marbled, grass-fed local beef from the Mid-Atlantic U.S. that beautifully seared to a beefy and savory medium. If anything, I feel less guilty trying the latter with wine than the former, which would provoke guilt in having it with anything. When a winery makes different tiers in different styles with all of them executed comparable in quality relative to their price brackets, all of them should be able to be enjoyed in their own right, on their own timelines, and savored for respective occasions!
@NoSediment5 күн бұрын
You are absolutely correct- this is why I especially liked what Andrew Jefford said, that fine wine should bring intense pleasure. As more casual wine after a long hard day can bring great pleasure as well! 🥂
@mickeylee26245 күн бұрын
I totally agree,@@NoSediment! It has to do with being Mindful and in the moment when tasting (rather than chugging) said beverage (wine, beer, liquor/spirit, cocktail, non-alcoholic drink) or food.
@panaceiasuberes64645 күн бұрын
Fine wine is a community for some. I just traded a Port vintage from 1959 with a wine collector from Denmark that has a Coronation Tawny that will allow me to exchange for a Blandy's from 1932 located in Torino from a British collector. I'm part of over 20 chat groups pertaining to both wines and beverages in general. And at least two of my vacations iare focused around a wine region or wine style. The community can be snobbish art times but that's preferable to the level of ignorance permeating so many discussions.
@robertfrank52035 күн бұрын
I agree with you overall. Note, it is unusual that you identify the wine you're getting only as a 1932 Blandy's. Which Madeira grape it is, is crucial, don't you think?
@bucal534 күн бұрын
Agnes, I think you miss my point. I only brought up Wagner because he was firmly documented as being a horrible human being yet created masterpieces that are influencing composers today. Of course this was not the main point, yet you brought the point up. Out of all the wines you've tasted and enjoyed immensely, don't you think that there are some people creating these wines that would put you off on a personal level ? The main point of the conversation was quality in fine wines and how we quantify that. Certainly you will not meet every winemaker of wines you consider great, so my point is the quality of the wine , not the personality of the winemaker. Nevertheless , I thoroughly enjoyed the interview as it was very enlightening. Santé
@NoSediment4 күн бұрын
Of course I know that, this is exactly why I brought it up. The wine might be great, and I should be able to mark it uninfluenced, 100%. Whether I can enjoy it as much as other great wines is a different question. Completely valid point from Your side!
@SirWussiePants6 күн бұрын
While I agree that low intervention grape growing/farming is a wonderful thing - "natural" wine hasnt blown me away. I have never tasted a "natural" wine that didnt taste like it.
@NoSediment6 күн бұрын
I think that natural wine world has changed and evolved so much, and I am happy to see so much wines out there that might be defined as “natural” but has no or very little of that funkiness we sometimes link with natural wine scene. 🥂
@markforman27686 күн бұрын
I've got a question. Which sparkling wine from Champagne have you tryed during the conversation?
@NoSediment6 күн бұрын
So we enjoyed this bottle: 2013 Pascal Agrapart L'Avizoise Blanc de Blancs Grand Cru Extra Brut
@markforman27686 күн бұрын
@@NoSediment wow what a stellar Champagne!
@verazaveri16 күн бұрын
fine wine brings intense pleasure
@NoSediment6 күн бұрын
Hahah, yes! One of the main thoughts, I guess! 🥂
@g.o.32625 күн бұрын
It felt like a waste when Palmer 1982 was opened as the 80th wine of that day, since it is unlikely that you were able to finish it.
@NoSediment5 күн бұрын
We tasted 80 wines during the day, did not drink 80 wines! And after the conversation we had lovely dinner, with rest of the company behind the camera, and all the wines were appreciated! 🍷
@g.o.32625 күн бұрын
@ That's wonderful news! Now, I can finally rest peacefully at night, without the nagging worry about that half-empty Palmer slowly fading away in some forgotten corner. 🎃
@mepo901896 күн бұрын
While it may be a personal thing, I don’t think a wine can be considered a fine wine if they affect a person adversely. So many California Cabernets are great examples. One shouldn’t wake up feeling like their head is the size of a basketball and makes a person congested. I never have this problem with “fine” Burgundy. Having said that, many Butgundy wines are, by design, considered “entry level. While you won’t get a basketball head, they are not considered fine. I would say that they are pedestrian.
@mepo901896 күн бұрын
I like the definition the one gentlemen offered up: that the wine is worth talking about. Which takes me back to one of your tastings Agnese where your immediate response to one wine was, “Wow”.
@mepo901896 күн бұрын
I like when wines are described as structured and elegant. I usually think of those wines as fine. But at the same time a simple Pinot Noir from Willamette Valley may not be structured or elegant but they are quite fine.
@NoSediment6 күн бұрын
I know what You mean, truly and shortly even touched upon this subject. But the truth is that sometimes it can be due some intolerances that specifically our body has. Therefore I might not write down all Cabernet Sauvignon’s from Napa’ 😅
@bradbellomo68964 күн бұрын
I am not sure I agree. Any red wine will give most people indigestion and headaches if they drink too much too close to going to bed. You can say you shouldn't overindulge, but where do you draw the line? If I feel fine with 3 glasses of a very clean but boring and cheap white wine before bed, does that mean any Burgundy that gives me a headache with 3 glasses is not fine wine?
@bradbellomo68964 күн бұрын
I'm not sure I agree. Many rustic wines, homemade or cheap, are interesting to talk about, have a sense of place and can age well. Are they fine wines? What about expensive whites with a definitive sense of place meant to be drank within 2 years of harvest?
@NoSediment4 күн бұрын
We all mentioned them. 😉
@numanuma206 күн бұрын
Do you fortified wine can be fine wine?
@NoSediment6 күн бұрын
Sure, absolutely. 💯
@bradbellomo68964 күн бұрын
Most people consider an oil painting to be "fine art" regardless of the actual quality of the work. Similarly, no matter how many Oscars a film receives, most people won't consider it "fine art". This definition has nothing to do with talent or merit or success and only the medium. Should a definition like this apply to wine?
@NoSediment4 күн бұрын
This is why we discussed this topic! 😉
@bucal535 күн бұрын
Agnes , you need to separate out personality with what pleasure you receive from an artist/winemaker. Wagner was a complete asshole but a genius as a musician -composer for example. People are complex
@NoSediment5 күн бұрын
Of course, however, that is not the main topic here. And there is huge difference of people in past and how people are acting in life now (presentism). Let’s just say this - if a person is really lovely I feel I am going to enjoy their work much, much more. 🙏🏻
@Ruirspirul6 күн бұрын
never get tired of saying that wine world and what is a “fine wine” was defined by culture who drinks tea with milk to soften tannins. edit: terroir talk is very curious. calling out Tuscany for using French varieties, called our Australians for multi regional blends and yet, not calling out Champaign for literally been the least terroir wine in a wine world (oh wait, you called out Champaign too but blamed California for imitating😂) or not calling out Bordeaux for blending 75 different grape varieties, vineyards, plots, casks. I think there are two elements people usually confuse when it comes to terroir. there are wines that express terroir which usually means, wine that expresses the specific location of vineyard and there are terroir wines, which means wines that are define by location, meaning, they use specific unique varieties, specific technics on every step of wine making, fermentation and aging and make unique style of wine. now, in these two definitions of terroir, Bordeaux and in a lesser extent, Champaign fit in only one and not the other. Bordeaux is a definition of true terroir style, they have created something unique that literally every region of wine world tries to copy but hardly a modern Bordeaux can be an example for wine that expresses a specific vineyard. I think what todays Bordeaux expresses the terroir of is unlimited resources. this is why Super Tuscan wines have a potential to express location of vineyards and vintages but Super Tuscan wines can never been a terroir wines as a style.
@NoSediment6 күн бұрын
I think Champagnes are especially terroir driven wines, no questions there! We specifically discuss this topic with one of the top experts on Champagne Peter Liem in one of my other podcasts! 🥂 Cheers!
@pierrecorin3546 күн бұрын
I have no idea what you want us to understand here. Perhaps you are pulling my leg !
@Ruirspirul6 күн бұрын
@@pierrecorin354 idea is. Bordeaux is true terroir style of wine that world copies. even legendary regions like Rioja. there would be no Rioja if it wasnt Bordeaux. on the other hand, there are wines in Rioja that express place at its fullest and can be called wine that expresses terroir. those are just two concepts miss matched. and not mutually inclusive. we know what Champaign suppose to be but Champeign hardly ever speaks about specific vineyard. in other words, there are levels to Terroir and most wine media and general knowledge of wine is always about surface level.
@pierrecorin3546 күн бұрын
Damn, I still don t get it, I am too dumb. Don t worry, it's fine.
@pierrecorin3546 күн бұрын
I think the British guest mistake pleasurable with fine wine, perhaps his modest background and thé woke culture that is invading UK as well as USA and the rest of Europe has influence wine critics as well…
@NoSediment6 күн бұрын
But I agree, one of the wine’s main functions is to be bring pleasure. If it fails to do so.. 🤷♀️
@pierrecorin3546 күн бұрын
Certainly, but that is not the point, the question was what is a fine wine and the British gentleman gave a new updated woke definition of it . The other gentleman gave an older definition from a book: a fine wine is what you can purchase at auctions. That is what the people who have the means are looking for, probably because a more refined pleasure can be obtained when sharing these wines with friends I like to believe, rather than just for the mercantile aspect of it...
@NoSediment6 күн бұрын
@pierrecorin354 well, that is exactly why I asked this question. It sparks conversations and discussions. As Andrew Jefford notes - this definition develops and evolves as well. If there would be three different people sitting the definitions would be different, I am certain of it. 🙏🏻
@Deb19Egan5 күн бұрын
'Modest background'? Andrew Jefford has a deep knowledge of wine and a world-wide reputation in the field. Have you looked at his extensive published material. I think your use of the term 'woke culture' is a throw-away (popularist) perjorative that has nothing to do with Jefford and this conversation.
@omglol46636 күн бұрын
The sound is horrible
@wineqco6 күн бұрын
I don't know what kind of speakers you have but I was listening to this on my great headphones and the sound is 9/10. Actually very good audio!
@SirWussiePants6 күн бұрын
Sounds good to me
@SN-if8dh6 күн бұрын
Yep, tons of clipping distortion from the 2 guys, very harsh indeed.