NTSB Boss Torched The FAA And Boeing Over DANGEROUS New/Old Max Defect And How The FAA Ignored It!

[@PanduPoluan]

Seriously I'm starting to think that "If it's Boeing, I ain't going!" seems to be the safest mindset now...

[@keeperofoddknowledgesociet3264]

Agree.

[@DannyWildmon]

Or else learn to fly your own private puddle jumper.

[@rockets4kids]

Who ever could have imagined that allowing big business to self-certify would lead to so many problems?

[@Dilley_G45]

Quite the opposite of what it used to be

[@andre-7423]

no, I think FAA 's primary job is to protect the US aviation industry. At least that's how this looks.

[@TMan786]

Maximus, in happier news all Boeing executive bonuses landed safely in their bank accounts. At no point was any money placed in any danger.

[@maximusaviationchannel]

Awesome point.

[@AnetaMihaylova-d6f]

​@maximusaviationchannel well that's what American capitalism is all about ain't it 😅

[@sheerluckholmes5468]

@@AnetaMihaylova-d6f Something about greed being good.

[@ABa-os6wm]

"Steering Comitee" did not lose the centerline, and sucessfully rolled out the bonusses at max speed according fo procedures. 😁😁😁

[@AnetaMihaylova-d6f]

@sheerluckholmes5468 well greed isn't good....and has never been

[@planemad]

Boeing's new slogan - Profit before safety 🤮

[@SaberToothBicycle]

New--being relative--it's an unwritten policy a few decades old now... Older than most of the Boeing airliners still in-service.

[@GrannySmith123]

New? They give lip service to Quality without compromise when everyone knows it's QUANTITY without compromise.

[@laurentitolledo1838]

_"...there is no profit in safety..."_

[@AbdullahNajib-b9z]

Airbus slogan:we don't care about rudders ripping off!we don't care about missing gear pins!

[@johnmorris7815]

It’s not the job of the FAA to “mitigate the impact to operators” it’s their job to bloody well regulate US aviation! That means grounding stuff when safety is at risk.

[@davesaucier8433]

The FAA ASI is Controlled by the Companies! Total Unqualified Aircraft Safety Inspectors'!

[@thomasboese3793]

Gee, the problems with the 737 family of craft have been well known for a time, but all of the FAA's groundings are going to Starship and the Super Heavy Booster of late. So who is really running the FAA? Boeing?

[@BabyMakR]

Nope. According the the FAA, Vulcan doesn't even need to be investigated after the side booster blew up, so apparently they're not that concerned about safety either. Just how good the lunches bought for them are.

[@davidmaisel8062]

The FAA regulates airspace, not batshit crazy todeler oligarchs. Bust class A airspace and find out. Completely justifiable. Prove airworthiness and get certified. It's that simple. No politics, no arguments, just facts.

[@BabyMakR]

@@davidmaisel8062 So Vulcan is 100% safe then. Even though it only didn't explode due to pure luck. And why is it that the NTSB is dragging the FAA for not enforcing safety standards around Boeing aircraft? Doesn't sound like they do much of anything towards the public safety.

[@sylviaelse5086]

"Dear Airline - we supplied you with part X. If it's currently on an aircraft, you should remove it, and here's how. If it's not on an aircraft, don't put it on." There you are Boeing. I've developed the procedure for you. You can send my consultancy fee to the usual place.

[@alanm8932]

The procedure might want to tidy up any hydraulic lines they've disconnected. Otherwise it might not be a safety improvement.

[@TC.C]

Boeing is the only company in the world who pays the ceo 42 millions a year for running it so badly

[@andywomack3414]

Wrong. Not the only company. Sometimes the CEO is paid to make the company fail.

[@flybywire5866]

@@andywomack3414 Well, that might be the reason for the amount of money.

[@GlutenEruption]

@@andywomack3414 exactly correct. The same exact thing is happening at countless major US companies and has been for several decades now. As long as the incentive structure continues to reward maximizing immediate profits above all else, executive compensation is not in any way tied to the long term viability of the company, CEO's come onboard knowing that they can take a golden parachute out the door at any time regardless of what they do to the company, and everyone involved continues to escape any sort of culpability legal or otherwise for even gross criminal misconduct, this will continue to get worse and worse.

[@andre-7423]

Such crooked organisation apparently recognises that the CEO has a slim chance of ending in prison, but let's face it ... due to corruption and the amount of money, they are untouchable. If the world was not corrupted, then no newer Boeing products would be allowed to fly due to their complete disregard for safety as long as there is profit in doing so.

[@davidmaisel8062]

Musk gets how many billions in compensation and government subsidies?

[@ukar69]

It seems like Boeing are hoping the problem is so rare that it's not worth their while addressing it. Complacency kills, something Boeing are experts in.

[@JB-yb4wn]

Boeing is just complying with the "Safety rules are written in blood" maxim.

[@paulzammataro7185]

...much like the Ford Pinto......

[@BabyMakR]

IIRC car manufacturers did the same thing.

[@georgesheffield1580]

No it's $$$in the back pockets

[@paintedpony2935]

"No! Of course that's not the end of the video. This is Boeing we're talking about here." 😅🤣😂 Best line of the day.

[@samedwards6683]

Why aren't Boeing Executives and Managers already in jail?

[@buckhorncortez]

On what charge?

[@rogerwilco4736]

​@@buckhorncortezif you don't know what charges, you're rather dumb

[@drjojo4624]

@@buckhorncortezcriminal endangerment and fraud would be the most likely to succeed. Incompetence and prioritising profit over safety aren’t unfortunately illegal.

[@233kosta]

​@@buckhorncortez Criminal negligence comes to mind

[@WilliamLanders-q2e]

I remember the two rudder hard over accidents from years ago that United and U S Air had A HYDRALIC unit that would fit in the palm of you hand had tolerances so tight of the parts in it that it would bind up and there was nothing the surprised pilots could do about it! It just shows thats its the little parts that can cause an airliner to end up as a smoking hole in the ground!!!

[@gregculverwell]

It was a little worse than just that. Regulations said that there must be dual systems for the rudder, but Boeing didn't want to pay for 2 valves, so they just put 2 spools 1 inside of the other to simulate dual circuits. When 1 spool jammed, the other went haywire. 2 things to learn from this.. Boeing was always into cutting corners, just not to the same degree as more recently and the FAA let their buddies get away with it.

[@buckhorncortez]

..."HYDRALIC..." All caps and incorrect spelling lend so much to the credibility of the comment...

[@richardbell7678]

The thing about the two fatal accidents with the icy cold power control unit trying to function with very hot hydraulic fluid was that the NTSB got lucky when the third Boeing 737 to experience the same thing, but did not crash with no survivors, so they could ask the pilots what happened and inspect the PCU.

[@GunsniperRZ8]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/bWjIo5J6iN5rmJI you talking about this then there is aswell the mcas and some other shit sneaked in or ugradet software without airlines knowing this

[@KayakCampingOffGrid]

Yikes, it's not a pleasant feeling to me to get on a Boeing aircraft... Why is the company so dysfunctional now...? Answer... PROFIT TO SHAREHOLDERS!

[@sirobin171]

I think we have arrived at not flying on the 737 anymore and f boeing.

[@CougarCat21]

YES!!!

[@robertadams2857]

The best source for aviation NEWS. Thanks Maximus

[@maximusaviationchannel]

Thank You!

[@slateslavens]

@@maximusaviationchannel no sir, thank _you._

[@AbdullahNajib-b9z]

He is so biased.320 has these issues as well

[@motovick]

If it was on a spaceX rocket the FAA would have been way more pro-active 😂

[@henson2k]

why? because elmo says so?

[@teddy.d174]

@@henson2k Because any human with a brain knows that the FAA hates Elon/SpaceX and will do everything in their power to f*ck with him and SpaceX.

[@thomasboese3793]

@@henson2k No, under the table Boeing runs the FAA and wants to keep Starship/Heavy Booster grounded. Boeing didn't get to be the one and only crew capsule provider they wanted to be so many years ago.

[@BabyMakR]

@@henson2k Because ULA has a booster rocket explode on ascent and FAA says it doesn't need to be investigated but a F9 has a hard landing and the whole fleet needs to be grounded pending an investigation.

[@valenrn8657]

@@BabyMakR It's two tier.

[@andreworton2132]

The fact they said cold weather affected rudder pads as excuse is very bad in its self because the aircraft should operate perfect in all weather cons , I have no words on how disgusting ! This company is!!

[@gumpyoldbugger6944]

Not to mention that at cruising levels, the termperature drop down it sub arctic temps, well below -40 C which is the same as --40F........toss in a bit of lingering condensation or moisture......well......you know......

[@Michael-oy3pz]

Will Boeing ever get their s*@t together and a very informative update. Well done Maximus ✈️👍

[@gumpyoldbugger6944]

Only if their commerical air division is sold off to a competent manufacturer of commerical airliners.....say, Embraer, Bombardier, De Havilland Canada, Airbus or dare I say it? Comac.

[@chancerNW]

@@gumpyoldbugger6944 They could just ask Airbus.

[@gumpyoldbugger6944]

@@chancerNW doubt that would work, most likely it would be a case of "in one ear, out the other". About the only way Airbus could help/save Boeing is if they took it over completely.

[@ShaneBaker]

Is it just me, or is supplying a rudder component that doesn't work in the cold, criminally stupid?

[@GrannySmith123]

There has been so many changes on the 737 Max it should have been an experimental AC, NOT a derivative.

[@icare7151]

Greetings from Colorado Springs. I witnessed the immediate aftermath of the United Airlines 737 crash here in Colorado Springs. I never want to see that again.

[@msorensen54]

That was a terrible day. That flight had departed Stapleton about 20 minutes before the accident. 25 people who had been alive and within walking distance of where we were working just 20 minutes before had lost their lives. Some of the guys I worked with were cut-ups who were always joking, but the mood was as sober as a Supreme Court session when we heard about the crash. Even to this day, my heart is in my throat, just thinking about it. The local news covered the accident, and for weeks we heard every detail available regarding the tragedy. As with most aviation coverage on television, there were some terribly inaccurate things being reported, and the coverage was presented for maximum emotional effect, instead of being confined to truly factual reporting. They interviewed a child who was near the crash site, and he said that he could see passengers pounding on the windows as the plane dove into the ground. That would be, simply, impossible, but then again, I can sympathize with the child; he was processing having seen something horrible and it’s not surprising that he would “remember” something he could not possible have seen. My guess is that the passengers were probably aware of having been thrown into the back of their seats, but little else. I’ve personally flown into COS from the same direction and the terrain below the approach path is rugged in places, end eventually passing over more populated areas. It’s fortunate that the plane didn’t impact any residences. As shockingly horrid as it was, it could have been much worse.

[@maximusaviationchannel]

San indeed.

[@Georgee-i3q]

If it's Boeing......... I'm NOT going Enough is enough

[@MrOlgrumpy]

I told all my family after the second max crash,fly anything else,take the train or walk.

[@Sweetlyfe]

NTSB Jennifer Homendy doesn’t mince words, good for her Boeing and the FAA definitely deserve it. The FAA needs to be shaken up they’re basically working for Boeing.

[@stephenpollard3739]

I worry for her safety.

[@norb0254]

I don't think Maximus would have a channel f it weren't for Boeing lol

[@maximusaviationchannel]

i know right. Airbus gives me Nothing lol

[@karlp8484]

"We are working closely with (fill in blank) to address the issue." Boeing must have that statement permanently on their autocue.

[@jerryweirdspeed8943]

They load it as a signature in Outlook to reply to press inboxes. Not that they'd have any time constraints. Removing faulty parts from aircraft is not what they are doing...

[@idanceforpennies281]

Ha ha, this constant cyborg response gets spit every single time. Like "We are Boeing, resistance/response is useless".

[@k9killer221]

@@idanceforpennies281 I am Borg I am Boeing. Because I have more lobbyists in Washington DC than you can imagine. FAA/NTSB resistance is useless.

[@andywomack3414]

Jennifer Homendy should run for President.

[@Elon_Marz]

It seems like the NTSB are the only adults in the room. Air safety would be totally screwed without them.

[@tscotom]

B0EING must /will N0T shrink to an NTSB puppy. It continues to assert it's Corporate persona as in as in their "T00 BIG T0 FAIL" !!! This 'Song and Dance' will continue on ... UNTIL the next ACCIDENT & it starts all over again. 😉😜😬

[@johnvanzoest4532]

Boeing.....trying for Russian levels of excellence.

[@Veritas2154]

If it's a Boeing I ain't going!

[@rex8255]

I remember when the joke about "don't fly in a plane that sounds like it's bouncing of off the ground" used to be funny.

[@wolfgangpreier9160]

If its a human pilot i am not going.

[@rex8255]

@@wolfgangpreier9160 I spent years testing software. I feel the opposite.

[@wolfgangpreier9160]

@@rex8255 Humans are hypocritical easily distractable sacks of colored water and extremely incompetent. I have written Software and it was me. Why? Because a HUMAN has written the Software. Let the Software write itself as Tesla is doing for years now. That one will work. Until then i stay on the ground.

[@nickjohnson410]

When you operate any vehicle, especially large vehicles like planes and boats, you have to be The Wolf from Pulp Fiction. I need to know everything about the vehicle. I need to know the tire pressure, engine type, operation hours, and maintenance log. I need to know if one of the switches is a little sticky or if a seatbelt is broken let alone the actual flight systems installed on the craft. Boing cares about money above all else... not the families getting on their planes.

[@joetaylor486]

Bring out the clowns, there should be clowns.

[@necroslair]

The clowns are in the C suites at Boeing and in the FAA.

[@MarkUKInsects]

The fix for the rudder issue is easy, it's called buy Airbus

[@AbdullahNajib-b9z]

well the issue is a supplier.and the same supplier(its collins) supplies airbus!

[@janwitts2688]

Obvious that boeing doesn't value its foreign operators... every one of these parts should have been removed before any of these hulls were allowed to fly again.. absurd safety culture..

[@AdavidPT]

One more for the "If it's Boeing, I ain't going!". Can't we just ban this hazard of a company from operating?

[@Adrian-qb1tp]

You really couldn't make this up if you tried, a once great company is now shattered. On another thought, if this is happening to civilian aircraft what could they possibly be hiding about the military ones, just a thought 🤔

[@herseem]

The fundamental structural problem here is that the FAA has conflicting objectives - to both regulate and promote aviation. When regulation sits in the same organisation as promotion, regulation suffers at the hands of promotion. That's why in the UK, for example, there was a move to separate out the regulation and promotion functions of several organisations. For example, the solicitors regulation authority is now separate from the law society that promotes lawyers interests. That's what needs to change - the FAA needs to be split into separate functions for that reason.

[@danielch6662]

FAA is supposed to do only regulation. There's no need for any split. But we see other gov officials pressuring the FAA to help speed up SpaceX's R&D.

[@herseem]

@@danielch6662 That's incorrect, the role of the FAA is not just regulation. It's right there in their mission statement - "safest, most efficient" - those two are competing demands, and that's the root of the problem right there. The demands of efficiency often override the demands of safety, especially after a long period of time without a major headline--grabbing crash Efficiency means expediency, and there are numerous examples of where the NTSB'sll recommendations have been ignored by the FAA because it would impede the efficiency printer directive, and which has then resulted in further deaths. For example, the failure to properly oversee the redesign of the cargo door in the DC10.

[@seegurke93]

I flew the -800 for 3 years. luckily never had any big problems, just the usual daily stuff.

[@linkcenter]

the Boeing grave is closed, I only miss the gravestone with the date on it.

[@MrOlgrumpy]

Too valuable to the defense industry/dept but possibly be broken up and the civil side dissolved.

[@johnnester2340]

Hmmm…maybe the new guy ain’t squeaky clean either 😂

[@robp4682]

At least Boeing Directors and Share Holders weren't affected

[@ressljs]

"One time, I'd like to do a video about Boeing... not endangering the public." Likely story for a Boeing Hater! OK, I know that's not true. For a while I was enjoying the s*** show because I work for one of their competitors in the military industry, and I kind of had an ax to grind about one of their past (in our opinion) dirty dealings. But as a frequent flyer, and not wanting to see Boeing's workers (and their other American based suppliers) lose their jobs, even I'm wishing they could get their act together.

[@Nobilangelo]

A rudder out of control sums up Boeing.

[@paulharrison8475]

The head of the FAA is incompetent and needs replacing.

[@PassiveSmoking]

The amount of contempt for Boeing in general and the Max in particular is palpable in this video! They really did a great job at taking their formerly Stirling reputation and flushing it down the toilet, didn't they?

[@yogibarista2818]

Ever since McDonnell Douglas bought Boeing with Boeing's own money, this company has gone from engineering-first to profit-first.

[@daveroche6522]

Boeing no longer make aircraft - they make profits. BIG, JUICY, DEFECT-FREE PROFITS! Anyone fancy an extra bonus?

[@PeterMullinger]

It what happens when you put non-engineers in charge of an engineering business.

[@dewyakana1543]

Love Homendy, she really cares about the flying public. "Boeing's gotta Boeing!". Goog one, Max. Thanks. Another Max EXCLUSIVE.

[@markleadbeatter6196]

I had to fly on a frankenmax for the first time a few weeks ago and have to say that I was genuinely apprehensive. What a sad contrast to the previously typical rush of excitement about flying on a new type for the first time and a reflection of how far from its previously lofty position Boeing has fallen eh?

[@georgjrgensen8507]

This borders on criminal intent...

[@SuperDave_BR549]

boing where quality escapes and ruin resides. thanks for the superb video Max, it was awesomely informative.

[@mbazzy123]

Well insint that just fantastic Greyhound is looking better and better.

[@gumpyoldbugger6944]

Given how gruesome and gruelling even a short Greyhound trip is at the best of times, that's saying something there mate.

[@markburgess4528]

Hey Boeing, our rudders are jamming. Boeing. Ah, just push the pedals harder.

[@blkbass]

With the new CEO coming from Collins, my hope that Boeing would be changed just got washed out...sounds like he's part of the problem too

[@ricardorosado1050]

I don’t know why airlines keep buying Boeing products 🤷🏽‍♂️🙄

[@LiveWire_Guy]

What are they going to buy? Airbus can't supply market demand. COMAC or UAC, perhaps... any takers?

[@Joe-xq3zu]

Funny thing is that the heads of a bunch of major airlines actually got together and straight told Boeing that if they didn't get their sh*t together they WOULD start looking for alternatives cost be damned.

[@kimmurphy1683]

Wow. Not until nowhere I seriously considered not flying on Boeing airplanes. Thank you for your wonderful information.

[@reefkeep2]

Something this story isn't mentioning, that there is a nose wheel steering lock out while the nose gear is in a weight off wheels condition. This prevents the nose wheel steering via steering tiller and or rudder pedals, being actuated while in flight. But it shouldn't affect normal rudder operation, but it would affect normal steering on the ground if the lockout didn't disengage for some reason.

[@ericrupert2687]

Every system ever designed can fail. The fix can fail. The fix for the fix can fail. Nothing can be made foolproof. If you that scared don’t fly.

[@reefkeep2]

@@ericrupert2687 I agree with you, I was stating there's other things in the system as well. That steering system was omitted from the story. I'm far from scared from flying, I've been an A&P for the past 4 and half decades, and 36 yrs experience on the 737 alone and 3 different generation on the 737 family, so I do know what I'm talking about.

[@rex8255]

The appropriate operating procedure for pilots with this "defect"... go home.

[@wadehiggins1114]

Thank God for Airbus 😊

[@valenrn8657]

FAA declared SpaceX must have the same "Boeing Safety Culture". LOL

[@matteofalduto766]

I'm Italian and I wholeheartedly approve the intro! ❤

[@PanduPoluan]

Is there ever an "intentional loss of control" of an aircraft?

[@JB-yb4wn]

Why yes, one mental pilot managed to deliberately crash his German Wings airliner into some mountains in France. Killing everyone. Another Air Egypt pilot crashed his airplane into the sea and another Malaysian Air pilot made his plane disappear and crashed it into the Indian Ocean.

[@user-yt198]

@@JB-yb4wn Actually cause of Air Egypt 990 crash was probably not suicide-murder, but failing of control surfaces in 767. FBI investigated the case and concluded that it wasn't suicide. It was covered up by NTSB at that time. So Boeing was Boeing in 1999 as well.

[@paulzammataro7185]

​@@JB-yb4wn ..that's intentional control....

[@JB-yb4wn]

@@user-yt198 The NTSB concluded that the crash was caused deliberately by the relief first officer, Gameel Al-Batouti, who was alone in the cockpit at the time of the descent. They cited the co-pilot's repeated statement of "Tawkalt ala Allah" ("I rely on God") on the cockpit voice recorder just before the aircraft entered the dive.

[@JB-yb4wn]

@@paulzammataro7185 That it is, that's what you asked for.

[@LiveWire_Guy]

I like this Homendy gal. We need many more people with her integrity.

[@edinnorthcarolina--ovelhog5786]

I will never forget the USAir 427 crash. I was flying 737s for USAir at the time. The NTSB, media and FAA rushed to blame the dead pilots. Fortunately, the Airline Pilot’s Union of America was able to replicate the rudder malfunction in a lab. The power control unit was at fault. A new PCU was oddly previously developed for the brand new (at the time) 737NG series.

[@TriumphT100T]

As a frequent flyer I have given up worrying, as there is nothing to do. I do however spent a minute before roll out contemplating the plane may crash.

[@kentfrederick8929]

The FAA has a dual mandate of regulating safety AND encouraging air travel. So, unlike other federal agencies, it does cost-benefit analysis as to how quickly a repair, fix, or modification should be done. The NTSB has been suggesting for years that the FAA mandate children under two have their own seats, rather than the option of lap children. The FAA argues that if it bans lap children, more families will drive. While driving is more dangerous than flying, should the regulatory agency agency be weighing air travel against other means of travel, in deciding its regulations? Mary Schiavo has said the dual mandate hurts aviation safety, but Congress seems uninterested in abolishing the mandate to encourage air travel.

[@SoloRenegade]

FAA has one set of rules for Boeing, Northrop Grumman, and Lockheed, and a separate set of rules for the rest of aviation and SpaceX.

[@Mack-ct9zd]

ANOTHER FABULOUS VIDEO THANK YOU MAXIMUS!!

[@jpthiran]

Maximus, your reports about boeing life seems to be like getting into a terror movie

[@keeperofoddknowledgesociet3264]

The 737 is junk. Anyone remember the rudder hard over under certain conditions? I say avoid this plane. In fact I’m glad I live in Atlanta and most of delta airplanes are airbus.

[@FrancisFjordCupola]

Boeing's gotta boeing, I guess. And in the end? Or at the end? The world of incompetence sounds like a small place.

[@henson2k]

737 is an ancient artifact

[@robertadams2857]

don't tell SW Air

[@henson2k]

@@robertadams2857 All SW cares is airplanes to be cheap

[@RalphEllis]

As you say. The 737 had a series of stuck ‘rudder hardovers’, which crashed two aircraft. The problem here, was those early 737s only having one actuator. All 737s were modified to have two actuators. Again, the sticking actuators were caused by the cold. R

[@FernandoNuno100]

But FAA canceled Starship flight for reasons nobody knows

[@paulzammataro7185]

If it's Boeing, I ain't Going!!

[@PhD63]

Boeing have only had 50 years to get this aircraft right. I’ve lost count of how many rudder problems this series of aircraft has had over the years.

[@johnnycab1000]

CEO Ortbergs credibility in the toilet because of this Collins connection?? I sincerely hope not, otherwise the games a bogey or is that Boeings a bogey. Well done Max. Another fine update and the NTSB is certainly starting to show some teeth I hope.

[@Mack-ct9zd]

I'm hopeful that Boeing will have a bright future because the new CEO is an Iowa farm boy, Boy Scout, and engineer. I love the values of the Boy Scouts, and the work ethic and "can do" attitude of Iowans that I know. I feel that these videos that shame and humiliate BOEING are helpful to create the necessary pressure to influence decision making.

[@necroslair]

Dear Boeing and FAA: Keep up the bad work! Sincerely, airBus

[@georgeburns7251]

Happily built by a Boeing UNION employee. “It ain’t my job!”

[@LiveWire_Guy]

Again, these criminal bastards will never be held accountable. They are precisely what is wrong with this country. Lying pieces of crap. But, they certainly have a core competency in bashing their engineers who speak out because they know better.

[@apollomoonlandings]

The hydraulic actuators for the rudder are lifetime components which should never have to be replaced. Not sure, but I think this stems from the piston within a piston for the rudder actuator which caused serious incidents and accidents of the 737 aircraft decades ago. Am I remembering this correctly? I guess Boeing doesn't replace parts which they have previously stated do not have a problem. In other words, they never figured out how to test it to make it jam. Others did.

[@louisdebruyn4395]

Sadly boeing should be closed down for not doing their jobs especially management!!

[@keithfellers8953]

I wonder why nobody at Boeing hasn’t been sent to prison?🤔

[@jantjarks7946]

The "Too big to fail" has to be tested out in full. I'm sorry to say it, but expect another 737, or even one of the other planes touched by the MDD merger management, to fall out of the skies one day due to Boeing's unsafety culture. Sad state of affairs with Boeing.

[@mikemolsee6827]

Configuration control is definately an issue with Boeing's aircraft...(oh we will just leave this part on the A/P since it is installed even though it's for ANOTHER Airlines configuration at no extra cost so we can meet the delivery date. You know, because we have a schedule that is more important than Passenger safety...) Damn the torpedos full speed ahead...Iceberg? What Iceberrr....

[@smoketinytom]

Well, I've just exclaimed "Oh FFS" on a packed train... And replaying the end with a little context about the failed parts, you've got agreement that it's more of the same at Boeing.

[@sheilasembly-crum8447]

I realize perfection is not guaranteed but at this point, Airbus is looking as a better flying option these days.

[@bjrnegillarsen1380]

It seems the FAA needs a major overhaul and some of their powers need to be transferred to the NTSB, and the treshold for what makes an upgrade major enough to count as an entirely new model must be lowewed significantly

[@swanvictor887]

Can anyone remember precisely how many decades we have now dealt with Rudder issues on Boeing 737s....???!!!!

[@kimrnhof107]

come on --it was a component installed on an airplane for a another customer, and then United got it instead, and it is a component that is used on speciale ILS landings and was deactivated - but it turn out, that if water got into the unit, it could freeze up, and the lock the system, even though it was not activated ! The error was that the firm that made it (and it was not Boeing) had sometimes installed the sealing wrongly, so water could get into the system of the unit. United knew that the plane had the system, but it was deactivated as United does not use that system. No one knew it could lock the system if water got into it. Well not until it froze the system of another jet and that was shortly before this incident! Mentour pilot has a video about this

[@AllAboutMe-cy9xj]

Cost, Schedule, and Shareholder Value over Quality and Safety. Boeing drives strong on this.

[@flamboone9727]

The most influential reason Airbus is doing better than Boeing is it’s pay-structure from the shop floor to the CEO.

[@billpugh58]

How sad. Boeing used to be the benchmark! It will take decades to get that respect back, if ever!

[@deeprecce9852]

Who gives a damn if every serious or murderous malpractices are only slap with fines, only affected parties are the share holders...

[@BlindBatG34]

Can you imagine the WTF head stretching the mechmust have been doing when the part that failed wasn't supposed to be installed on the plane?

[@gasdive]

You need to look at the recent ULA engine explosion 20 seconds after launch that apparently doesn't need investigation according to the FAA. If the debris had gone the other way, in, instead of out, it would have destroyed the rocket and released 2 solid rocket boosters, still with 60 seconds of fuel and no way to steer, destroy or shut them down

[@meskes4059]

Whitaker needs to go.

[@flamboone9727]

The faulty actuator was a feature on A&E air disaster episode.

[@dalemullins4562]

@ 5:03 use " MAXIMUS force" ...thank you

[@DannyWildmon]

They should change the name to Boing like the sound that a spring makes in the old cartoons....

[@thomasmichaelschwarz9741]

Good to hear that Boeing now has a CEO who will rigorously wipe everything under the rug, to cover up his mistakes from earlier life....👍👍👍 if ever possible I book airlines which do not operate Boeing planes even if more expensive.

[@uhadonejob]

But the Boeing question is will this affect the stock price this quarter?