OJ25 Episode 23 - The TRUE Story of the OJ Simpson Trial (Court TV Docuseries)

[@josephcunningham449]

This is the most bizarre phase in my opinion. Two people butchered to death, one nearly beheaded with a trail of blood to OJs house. And arguing on taxpayer’s dime over shades of brown vs mink, $250 vs $1000 sanctions, punctuality, could it be jeans, appealing weather or not to inform the jury to ignore one racist cop’s testimony. This trial got so branched out that I’m surprised 5 year old me in 1995 wasn’t called to the stand for something. I am from Chicago, let’s call the whole city to testify seeing the airplane flying over their house and what shade of silver the plane was. Shame on that judge for allowing this to get so far fetched. It’s inception-level deep down levels at this point. I guess he DID get a fair trial though, no stone was left unturned on the earth or the moon.

[@hernandayolearyallda]

The shade of brown matters b/c they are claiming it is the same glove, when the evidence shows it is not even the same color glove.

[@KevinShaughnessy-lf3vs]

@@hernandayolearyallda Without the real glove ! Without the real knife It's a speculation of what could have happened ! How much blood? Soaked , from a bloody finger The glove came off ! There's no eyewitness A barking dog, is discovery It isn't a timeline. The murder weapon Never found Bloody clothes Never found ! It's all circumstantial to believe anything after the fact! With no direct involvement to the crime scene

[@SamuelLenard-f3p]

@@hernandayolearyallda you're an idi0t

[@SamuelLenard-f3p]

That Judge and those defense attorneys should be ashamed of themselves....the defense attorneys knows for a fact that OJ is definitely guilty, that's why they didn't make him testify.....their logic towards Mark Furhman is that if he was wearing a white underwear rather than a black one that would make him a racist...they created racism everywhere in that case because they know that the black illiterate jurors would swallow it hook line and sinker

[@nanalala9935]

3'40 the last look Nicole and Ron saw on this planet earth, Simpon's stare

[@MadWeiner]

I wouldn't own a pair of those ugly ass gloves.

[@philipwilliams1754]

He didn't,they were planted.They were clearly small.

[@lizb8499]

​@@philipwilliams1754 Oh! It must have been another pair that he was wearing during a broadcast on national TV that looked just like the gloves. Strange though how Nicole's signature was on the receipt showing she bought them for OJ. Amazing coincidences!

[@jamespeful]

😂😂

[@PIZZATIME45Smith]

@@philipwilliams1754there’s a receipt from NICOLE that she brought him the gloves from Bloomingdale’s he did it and he is a Murderer and now in hell

[@lesterpaul9657]

Everytime I watch a new episode I see another lawyer in the defense team. How many were there? A bataillon? No wonder Simpson was almost broke after the trial.

[@jonathanwilliams5235]

Exactly. You had Peter neufeld, he’s the one with glasses and moustache, Barry scheck, Shapiro, Douglas, Cochran, Molly Shannon. Just recently I saw that she was one of the attorneys for OJ. Robert Kardashian. This list are just the ones I know of from watching the series, OJ25, hosted by legal analyst, Roger Cossack, here on KZbin. 👍

[@lesterpaul9657]

@@jonathanwilliams5235 Don' t to forget Bailey and Dershowitz. But I' m not sure if they worked pro bono.

[@theinquisitiveprince7095]

A handful of lawyers on the defense went up against the LAPD, LA Prosecution, LAPD criminalists, California Highway patrol, California SBI, US department of Justice, FBI, CIA, Chicago PD, NYPD, and Interpol. The people clearly had the advantage of man power in this trial.

[@kanyebreast6072]

The only lawyer who got paid was Johnny Cochran. Robert Kardashian confirmed that he and most of the other lawyers either didn't get paid, or was only paid a small amount.

[@jonathanwilliams5235]

@@kanyebreast6072 my last name isn’t Cochran and my first name is Jon so now you know I wasn’t paid anything to represent OJ. All I got was the knit cap saying if it doesn’t fit you must acquit 😁🤣

[@Juliet_Tobin]

7.13. Marcia is at her most effective when she gets angry and stands up to the defense. I like it. She should have been this sharp and dynamic more often.

[@TammyM36]

She was several times if you watched the full trail in its entirety

[@lesterpaul9657]

With not much support by Darden I guess. He was too often intimidated by Cochran.

[@jadedheartsz]

nah she was an obnoxious and irritating self-righteous bitch

[@Tahtiluv]

I love Marcia. I think both her and Darden were too emotional. If it’s true that she didn’t let her kids stay with their dad yet with baby sitters while she fought this trial that was a bad personal decision that effected her focus and work. As a mom I know how hard that can be

[@jadedheartsz]

@@Tahtiluv I thought she came off as really unpleasant at times, her book was very self-serving.

[@jonathanwilliams5235]

Since I’ve been following the re-broadcast of this trial, the biggest problem that have is, As I watched part 18,19 of the trial is that Det Fuhrman had been removed from the investigation from the very beginning but was not removed from the list of witnesses to testify in the case. WHY WAS HE ALLOWED TO TESTIFY⁉️

[@Ed-uz6em]

He supposedly found the Rockingham glove…they had to call him

[@jonathanwilliams5235]

@@Ed-uz6em once you are removed from any investigation, for any reason, you are, Forbidden, from handling any evidence whatsoever for any reason. ❌He can’t do that and Judge Ito allowed that to happen. Big mistake. Especially with all that was on the line and in a case of that magnitude.

[@jiogcyihsugyiocjfdoivhphvw6821]

he was allowed bc................................................................................................................. he..................................................................................................................................... was involved in the case............................................................................................................

[@opaque4742]

It's not a case of allowed or disallowed: Genius Marcia DECIDED to call Fuhrman even though Dershowitz gave her the credit of believing she was too smart to call him to the stand.

[@philipwilliams1754]

@@jiogcyihsugyiocjfdoivhphvw6821 He planted the Rockingham glove,to get back on the case.

[@j.m.5744]

I can't believe Marcia Clark had the balls to say "that's enough MONKEYING around" during THIS trial. I'm surprised Johnny Cochran didn't flip out.

[@Tahtiluv]

🤣🤣🤣 she should have known better than to say that huh? Lmao but what I love about Johhnie is he was such an amazing attorney and “reader of the room” that he knew that people would view that as truly playing the race card. We all knew Marcia Clarke wasn’t racist; he focused his energy on the man that actually was. He was brilliant 🤩

[@86BarbOmega]

you see race everywhere lol thou doth protest too much

[@jiogcyihsugyiocjfdoivhphvw6821]

ya cause that isnt a normal phrase used by everyone................................................................................... u cant be that dumb

[@jadedheartsz]

@@86BarbOmega quiet nazi troll

[@christinelage1380]

Johnny Cochran was a wife beater,himself!!

[@sha11235]

Talk about Cochran saying the jury being lied to. Hell, they were lied to by him and his whole damn team!

[@Zero_Point_Energy1]

OJ aside, imagine having a cop testify that he found a bunch of the evidence against you. Then imagine, when he’s asked if he planted it, he takes the fifth. Then, the judge says the jury shouldn’t ever hear that the cop wouldn’t stand behind his testimony.

[@qalba3016]

The investigators have moved blood from a crime scene to another,!! Big mistake 2nd- who takes the defendant blood from Lab back to his house and why,!! What happened is this OJ killed Mrs Brown and Mr Goldman, we all agree Also police Planted evidence by make unforgivable mistakes , later defendant defense were so good that they won , Finally the both victims families paid the price The mistakes were made , a beginner investigator wouldn’t do Big big time mistakes

[@velimasuku8808]

Facts

[@spearfisherman308]

Imagine being falsely accused of planting evidence he took the fifth because Marcia wouldn’t object.

[@velimasuku8808]

@@spearfisherman308 evidence suggests otherwise 🤣🤣🤣

[@spearfisherman308]

@@velimasuku8808 no it doesn't troll.

[@jimreily7538]

Has it ever happened in history, that an INNOCENT person FALSELY accused of murder, was shown in photographs to be wearing the extremely rare gloves used by the murderer. And, the same extremely rare shoes. Hey, OJ, just admit it.

[@Jeff-is1wh]

Nicole bought two pairs of gloves . One for OJ and one for Jason.

[@philipwilliams1754]

OJ wears gloves with hand warmers.

[@philipwilliams1754]

The receipt said nothing about gloves,male,female size,color,make.She bought some thing I think for 55 dollars.

[@philipwilliams1754]

They didn't fit.

[@hernandayolearyallda]

They aren't even the same color.

[@sharonharrison3611]

The fact that the gloves were soaked in blood then dried and probably shrunk was not mentioned that I recall. I'm sure the goves fit perfectly.

[@daffyduckfan4478]

Oh really, how are you so sure?

[@terrellhopkins9205]

One witnessed mentioned doing an experiment with blood on the exact same glove type, which had no shrinkage.

[@markchronister4620]

I have worn countless pairs of thin and medium thickness fitted leather gloves for almost 60 years for work, hunting, and shooting. Every pair I ever had that got wet, whether by water, sweat, or whatever all shrunk and stiffened while drying therefore requiring stretching and working fingers to get original fitted gloves to fit again. I always have felt the prosecution should have never done the glove thing………….

[@RONJAE212003]

Bullshit. Bcse it did NOT fucking fit all y’all have these fucking excuses. It’s hilarious

[@markchronister4620]

Jacque Renee, although you are quite entitled to your opinion you are incorrect. It’s not an excuse as you say, I stated something that is absolute 100% fact. Certainly no need to use vulgarities. That makes you the one who is hilarious.

[@steelermia]

shoe impressions expert lol .. there really is an 'expert' for everything isn't there

[@pommiebears]

I’ve seen this expert in another trial. He is an impressions expert. Not just shoes, but tyres, and other types of impressions. Like…..how do you get a job in impressions?? Lol.

[@andrerobinson2923]

It appears so.

[@ryankazmierczak1335]

Especially when you have the money. Watching this shows me that the jury absolutely had some reasonable doubt.

[@Juliet_Tobin]

Yeah, I laughed at "glove expert" for the same reason. . Is there much work available for glove experts and impression experts or do they just charge a fortune when a job comes along? These are pretty strange job descriptions!

[@traviscole6365]

Yeah for real They brought in the Old CEO and Vice President of the Isotoner Glove company to testify and prosecutors went to Italy or somewhere to see the glove plant Like wow

[@aprilpuglia7967]

Judge Ito was petty spaghetti 😂

[@jadedheartsz]

no

[@kanyebreast6072]

Petty spaghetti?? That's so cringe

[@jiogcyihsugyiocjfdoivhphvw6821]

r u high on crack

[@Deathadder1994]

I love this glove expert, I don’t care if he said he wished he could be at the victory party, He’s an expert you know he lives and breathes gloves and can tell you anything and everything.

[@SethMacLeod95]

Yeah, he knew he was guilty but was completely honest. He couldn’t favor either sides if he wanted to lol

[@jadedheartsz]

@@SethMacLeod95 he's innocent.

[@chriscoop7666]

​@@jadedheartsz who is innocent? The glove expert?

[@jadedheartsz]

@@chriscoop7666 OJ genius

[@mutedmutiny9542]

@@jadedheartsz no he isn't. Even when you are acquitted they don't say "innocent", they say "not guilty", but he obviously did it - he admitted it to a few people who were close to him like AC and his former agent Mike Gilbert.

[@Berkmugga]

Anyone else notice the blood in the bronco was on the passenger side? No blood on the drivers side. 🤔

[@Berkmugga]

@@Chad_Max so he changed out of drenched bloody clothes on the passenger side and all he left over there was a smear on the console??? He then took bloody clothes he just used in a double murder to airport? One of the most videotaped security guarded littered with police locations in the country??? Ferman took the clove and smeared it on the passenger side of the console because it was the right glove and he’s stupid. He then planted the glove. His logic is OJ would have been wearing the glove while driving and rested it on the right side of the console. While naked and not wearing the other glove. The fact that people refuse to look at how stupid the case was against this man this many years later and and still accuse him of a murder he didn’t commit is horrifying. People are stupid. Keep them out of your life.

[@philipwilliams1754]

@@Berkmugga You deserve a Heisman Trophy.

[@philipwilliams1754]

@@Berkmugga I always felt Shapiro and Dershowitz should have had the California Supreme make a decision on wether they had enough evidence to charge him,or his arrest was lergal.

[@Jac70]

The blood evidence highlighted in this video was to the passenger side of the centre console. The side that is more likely to come into contact with the driver when they touch the centre console by resting on it or reaching down to it. All the other blood stains found in the Bronco were driver's side.

[@brittanydiane214]

Check out the video where they discuss OJ’s son was killer. They dive deep into that observation. There were some other interesting incidents on the passenger side that points to there being someone else involved. Specifically his son. He was the only family member that refused an interview and lawyered up quick. Has several pictures with him wearing that navy skull cap too.

[@richardoliveira153]

OH COME ON PEOPLE... I didn't know about all these photos with the so called rare gloves. Only seen this now after all this years. This is very, I mean, VERY bad for Simpson. It does look bad.. not that he need it to look bad already tho

[@MrBoDiggety]

DNA trail to his house wasn’t enough?

[@truesonic669]

berry sheck is amazing.

[@bielefeldundmehr2461]

Barry Scheck

[@philipwilliams1754]

Neufeld was more devastating.

[@simonepeterson3301]

BARRY

[@simonepeterson3301]

Peter Newfield and Barry were both amazing

[@daviddavis3389]

True, Barry very well should receive the" most valuable attorney" trophy for his contribution to OJs justice !!!

[@tfa8]

Judge Ito was biased towards the defense, he was still angry about the appeal court rejection of his jury statement and now he was trying to retaliate to the prosecution, 250US$ fine ... oh you still speaking ... 1000US$ fine... this guy should never have sit in a courtroom

[@jadedheartsz]

no he was not lying nazi troll, he ruled in favor of the prosecution several times and refused to let most of the tapes played for the jury, including the part where Fuhrman talks about planting evidence.

[@willymcpeters2982]

Thank god the jury found oj guilty

[@luskapani9905]

Dream team= devil’s advocate

[@larryjames3437]

For doing their job

[@jadedheartsz]

troll

[@Tahtiluv]

Nah

[@jiogcyihsugyiocjfdoivhphvw6821]

try again

[@willymcpeters2982]

​@@Tahtiluvyeah

[@SethBergile]

I can't believe I'm still here....... What a shit show this case was.

[@simonepeterson3301]

That lawyer ,that cross exammed the glove expert,Omg 👌, he understood the assignment 😂😂

[@phildirt3]

The trial of Mark Fuhrman

[@jadedheartsz]

he deserved it

[@jonathanwilliams5235]

As Difficult as it was for Everyone involved to have to sit through this case, THIS CASE SHOULD have been ruled a MISTRIAL. A witness being removed from a case at the beginning, a witness collecting handling reviewing evidence in a high profile case should never had been called to testify in a case where he had already been removed. That was the problem a lot of people had with Judge Ito in the first place. A MISTRIAL SHOULD HAVE BEEN FOUND IN THIS SITUATION. 🙅‍♂️🙇‍♂️

[@jiogcyihsugyiocjfdoivhphvw6821]

nope, not a mistrial, drunkard

[@bford5899]

A judge can't just declare a mistrial anytime he wants. Being removed from the case doesn't excuse you from having to testify to what you did, especially when you "discovered" most of the physical evidence. That's not the way the law works

[@wavyamar]

OJ face lookin' at Marcia Clarke talking about Furhman he was about to go down for a 3rd murder 😂 I believe that Furhman did plant the glove tho.

[@philipwilliams1754]

The gloves were very small,planted.

[@philipwilliams1754]

Lee and other experts explained,the blood on the glove's should be on the back,not on the front finger and palm area.If youre fists are clenched,grabbing,holding a knife.

[@MoonShadows1995]

At time of the trial in 95’, I never thought so. After watching this series, now I’m beginning to wonder. Appears OJ parked the bronco in front haphazardly off the street in front of his house & then walked in the front door. Idt OJ was ever around the side or back of his house. Furhman was the one who thumped Kato’s air conditioner. OJ did it though.

[@tobak952]

the sheer audacity of the procecution to appeal, and then try to prevent the defense from doing the same.

[@iPro3million]

They were successful in their appeal, Ito’s jury instruction re Fuhrman was overturned by the appellate court. I.e they sided with the prosecution, so not sure what you’re talking about

[@tobak952]

@@iPro3million im not saying that the procecution couldnt appeal, they just shouldnt be allowed to appeal, and then stop the defense doing the same.

[@iPro3million]

@@tobak952 both sides argue in favour of things they want to happen, and against things they don’t want to happen. That’s how a trial works. Rest assured the defence did everything in their power to stop the prosecution from appealing in the first place, even though it was their right to do so

[@tobak952]

@@iPro3million correct. All im saying is that when the prosecution used the exact same arguments about delaying the trial as the defense had just, unsuccessfully, used against them, it sounded extremely hollow. Usually you pick your battles douring a trial, Marcia was determined to fight them all.

[@swannyburger5866]

That glove examiner and test was smoke and mirrors. Half ass.

[@andrerobinson2923]

It worked.

[@calvinmccoy3463]

Johnny Cochran has got a nerve talking about the prosecution holding up things the way his ass would nitpick every detail that had nothing to do with the case and needing a day to prepare please!!!

[@daffyduckfan4478]

At least his “nitpicking” had substance.

[@jadedheartsz]

nah they had some nerve trying to appeal and then trying to stop the defense from doing it nazi troll

[@jiogcyihsugyiocjfdoivhphvw6821]

ya cause he wasted a month on dna right............................................................................................ drunkard

[@simonepeterson3301]

😂😂😂😂😂

[@sha11235]

Ito didn't say Ms. Clark's name with all the other prosecutors, notice?

[@Tiggaknock]

Man I couldn’t imagine actually watching this on television. I would’ve never gotten thru it with all these damn commercials.

[@shotty2164]

Have premium. Can’t relate.

[@Tiggaknock]

@@shotty2164 I meant their court TV commercial breaks back when people had cable, not KZbin's 🙄

[@TheMrbc74]

What commercials I’m on premium

[@Tiggaknock]

@@TheMrbc74 The breaks like those at 7:59 I assume are where there were commercials for people who had cable TV at the time this was televised. I was saying I couldn't imagine having to deal with all those commercials because there are a lot of those breaks through this series.

[@jiogcyihsugyiocjfdoivhphvw6821]

there are no commercials

[@Tahtiluv]

That was cold what Ito did with that sanction. I don’t agree with that at all

[@marvinbrando722]

The defense, it is simply the best defense team assembled in history. With all their issues, they were dominant in the room, destroying DA's witnesses, evidence left and right Very good

[@at6686]

If you’re interested in getting people off rather than the truth or justice you’re right.

[@marvinbrando722]

@@at6686 . What's the truth? Your truth? Justice? Like what ? USA invaded Syria and calling Syrians terrorists for defending their land from USA troops? Please, grow up. If you were in a mess like that, believe me, you will wish to have a team like that.

[@at6686]

@@marvinbrando722 So the Syrians did I it? Or are they racists as well? Hard to keep your stream of illogic straight. But you are right on one thing. If I was guilty, Id definitely want these scumbags to be my liars, err lawyers.

[@marvinbrando722]

@@at6686 . I was using an "anology", but I see it is very hard for your brain to understand it. You are talking about "truth" and "justice " , just as you were there. You dont know who killed them, because you were not there. The police (Lapd) has a history of planting evidence, inventing false reports, etc. So, don't they do it this time ? About racist. Unless you dont want to admit it, whites in this country have been racist for long time. No all, but a lot. In the past, I would say 90% of them for sure. So, it is your truth without fundamentals and based on what the media feed you. And the your justice, based on the same, plus prejudice against black people. That case didn't have a "huge amount of evidence " as the media and government repeats and repeats. That's just no true All the evidences were destroyed by the defense. The shoes for example, the defense had Dr Henry lee. I mean, Dr Henry Lee and no a Liberal Art FBI agent. Got it ? And like that with the rest.

[@at6686]

@@marvinbrando722 You remind me of Christians that even when confronted with the piles of evidence that their holy book is completely made up, continue to believe their fantasy friend is real. Your faith is like all faith. Belief without proof.

[@crazyjock999]

The majority of these scenes/ examination, cross exam. All the best legal minds in the country fighting for, in my belief a guilty party. The defence was just too good and they didn't miss a trick. Attack the witnesses, question the time of incident how they went about their relevant jobs. And the defence just found major holes in almost every prosecution witness. Every human makes mistakes form time to time but the amount in this is worrying. Glad it all came to surface.

[@emo7636]

This was the biggest sham of a trial I've ever heard of. Just a team defense attorneys with no moral compass pandering to millions of star-struck fans.

[@marvinbrando722]

You got it. Most people just don't want to see, simply because most people are biased. You are an exemption

[@marvinbrando722]

@@emo7636. You are funny. One day when the government goes against you, you will wish to have lawyers like these

[@andrerobinson2923]

Marcia Clark revealed later that she was told by another State's attorney that she was going to lose this case before it started. I lost where that video is on KZbin.

[@enggopah]

The weird thing to me is that many times the defense's supposed "holes" and refutations were shown subsequently in the trial to be false. But no one seems to have noticed most times, as the defense's refutations were made into big news and are still always highlighted. Form over substance, as was said somewhere in this series.

[@AdrianColley]

I can hardly believe how much time and effort was put into the question of whether the gloves did or didn't fit the defendant's hands. They obviously did, courtroom theatrics notwithstanding, and the jury never doubted it. If only they could have sent a note saying "stop with the gloves" (but of course they couldn't).

[@Juliet_Tobin]

So true and why in the world did everyone believe OJ of all people, when he claimed the gloves didn't fit? They needed an officer of the court to put the gloves on him and make sure he wasn't deliberately impeding the fit. It's absolutely mind boggling that they didn't do this.

[@tobak952]

what leads you to believe the jury didnt doubt it? i certainly doubt it and im confused how anyone can not doubt it. Infact, i dont believe they fit

[@jadedheartsz]

no they did not.

[@jadedheartsz]

@@Juliet_Tobin they didn't look like they fit

[@Juliet_Tobin]

@@jadedheartsz Watch OJ Made in America. You shouldn't believe the accused - of all people in the world- is being honest about them not fitting, One of the jurors said she lost respect for Darden because he fell for this.

[@brianfreeman8124]

If oj didnt do it he should have look at those gloves like a rattlesnake... I aint touching those things

[@ikediamond]

When your “star witness” takes a 5th amendment plea your case is unequivocal trash!

[@iPro3million]

Who are you quoting? The prosecution never called Fuhrman their star witness

[@tabbyreed8925]

After the trail was over did he ask for his glove back?

[@sha11235]

Of course, Marcia could've brought Fuhrman back to explain the tapes. But, no.................

[@hunnagmgb1969]

Lol he didn’t get to go to the victory party 😂😂😂

[@iPro3million]

I don’t think he was that arsed, it was a light hearted joke

[@Ghost-ch6ik]

They found a picture of him wearing the shoes too 👀 unfortunately it was after the case was over.

[@saffiyah4447]

They made more than one pair

[@mexi54]

OJ laughing getting his hands measured so funny. lol

[@opaque4742]

The problem was, they were off their game most of the trial. To begin, they thought the defense would ask for more time for openings--it didn't happen. The defense was MORE prepared than the prosecution, and it showed. Darden and Clark were writing their closing arguments the night before giving them; Cochran and Scheck had theirs ready. The state was always REacting to the defense rather than being PROactive and setting the tone. Also, they had evidence but they made many bad judgment calls, starting with believing black female jurors would automatically buy into the domestic violence escalating to murder theory, whereas a number of them didn't see a direct progression. They were already desperate and in trouble before Fuhrman testified. Once he was done, THEY were done. The defense could have won if they never put on a defense. Gerry Spence, famous defense lawyer, would not have put on a defense and I see why: prosecution was a COMPLETE mess.

[@nattyps3160]

Yes Vince bugliosis video 100% guilty goes into detail how horrid Clark & Darden were & just started writing closing the night b4 til 4 am like a college student cramming. He said he would give 100hrs doing his closing which he'd start drafting during the trial re editing til he assured his best for a hopeful masterpiece . I've seen major cases won based on a powerful closing. The d.a. in the Martha moxley case was so brilliant in his closing its what put away her killer 20years later

[@andrerobinson2923]

This is one of the best narratives I've read. Thanks for sharing.

[@KMG1565]

With all the talk about Cochran and Bailey and Scheck - that Bob Blasier was one bulldog POS for the defense

[@kezzykez2471]

Nicole bought two pairs of large gloves one for OJ and one Jason. This again points directly to Jason.

[@iPro3million]

How does it point directly to Jason?

[@MarioGarcia-vd6mk]

Ito got bullied by the so called dream team.

[@ikediamond]

The frame up of the century

[@jiogcyihsugyiocjfdoivhphvw6821]

ito- "prosecution, call rebuttal witness" clark-" heres 6483928474568329038745839283745 photographers"

[@DanielaLopez-xe7uk]

😂😂😂

[@gilbogilbo79]

The amount of evidence in this case is astounding. How dumb were those jurors ? Unbelievable.

[@Jeromemayle]

Here we go, clearly you haven't watched this series AT ALL!!!!.... 🙄

[@daffyduckfan4478]

@@Jeromemayle 🤣 episode 23 and I haven’t seen anything in a piece of evidence that wasn’t planted.

[@qalba3016]

The police made unforgivable mistakes that now this case is taught in university’s , who takes blood samples from a crime scene to another,?? Who takes on another day a blood sample to a crime scene, the OJ house and WHY,?? I myself think the LAPD and lab messed up so bad that I started to believe they did actually plant evidence, the mistakes are many 1 big time after another this is insane, a beginner investigator would do Cheers

[@qalba3016]

What really happened is , OJ killed Mrs Brown’ and Mr Goldman, at the same time police investigators planted evidence and later the families of both paid the price

[@qalba3016]

Once the blood entered the lab, has no business out that’s what I’m saying, this is a basic rule that doesn’t take 2 people to even discuss

[@kathleendobens6648]

Show the chase!!!

[@at6686]

I realize OJ is a minor player in this shit show, but somebody remind why he didn’t testify? Seems OJ would have wanted to proclaim to the world under oath that he was innocent and what he did that night.

[@pommiebears]

Because he would have been hung out to dry. Look at the civil trial. He had to testify, and completely tanked. Lol.

[@Jack-b5o6r]

@@pommiebears agreed he bombed at the civil trial ….

[@gnas3390]

His attorneys recommend that he didn't because of the time it would have taken. Probably at least a month.

[@andrerobinson2923]

You don't have to testify if you have a Legal Team like OJ had.

[@at1970]

@@andrerobinson2923 Correct. You don’t even have to be innocent. As he clearly wasn’t.

[@111111111Tiger]

FAIR TRAIL ? lmao !

[@OneWayJesus777-x2n]

YOU MEAN KILLERS NOT THE KILLER DUDE GET IT RIGHT

[@nattyps3160]

It's pathetic w/ all the money the d.a. had 23 prosecutors & they didn't find the bills yearbook of oj in the Bruno maglis. That's why he lost the Civil suit cause the Goldman attorney on his own found hundreds of photos of oj in the Bruno maglis. Published in the freaking 1993 bills yearbook. Ojs team found these 9 year old furhman tapes & the gloves screwed them & still obsessing on the gloves instead of finding the magli size 12 only 200 paid bought in the world those were the killers shoes. Boom case closed

[@philipwilliams1754]

Photo shopped,Clark had them.

[@wsean87]

To be fair his blood was all over the crime scene they didn't need the shoes ..at least they shouldn't have

[@davidtangen8189]

Maybe they didn't because he was wearing white gloves underneath the black gloves like He'll mcfly

[@CIF-pm7tk]

For Cochran to say he was outraged and chilled when he heard the Fuhrman tapes is the biggest lie of the century! He was bricked up and ready to spew he was so happy! Let’s be honest!!!

[@giii7599]

Incompetent prosecutors.

[@CourtneyKhan-80]

Its interesting to me that ONE juror was apart of this series - where the heck is all the others to explain what a joke that decision was.

[@jpenir]

Oof. I just read a book on the Civil Trial. They introduced a lot more evidence that there wasn't in the criminal trial. And the plaintiff attorneys were actually competent unlike the prosecutors in the criminal trial. The civil trial was the true outcome.

[@sha11235]

Petrocelli's book, right? He was very similar to Vincent Bugliosi, determined to get justice. And yes, these prosecutors were dummies.

[@jpenir]

@sha11235 yes Petrocelli's book. Almost everything that was unanswered in the criminal trial (the "missing blood", the footprints, the shoes, etc) was answered in Civil

[@Stantheman9398]

​@@jpenirOK wat was d explanation den

[@jpenir]

@@Stantheman9398 the explanation was OJ killed two people.

[@iPro3million]

Clark and Darden were very successful prosecutors

[@michaelengen7392]

Mark Fuhrman couldn't have planted the glove at OJs home. He wouldn't have had enough time to realize there was a glove involved in the investigation at Nicoles home, the actual murder scene, when he found the matching glove at OJs home. He was only at OJs home to notify OJ of the murder. Fuhrman never went to the murder scene before he found the second glove at OJs home within hours of the murders. Fuhrman couldn't possibly know if he was about to frame a man (OJ) who had an air tight alibi. In order for Mark Fuhrman to have planted the second glove at OJs home he: -Would need to know about the first glove (left glove) at Nichols home. -Would need to know the size, make and model of that first glove found at Nicoles so he could plant the correct matching right hand glove at OJs home. -Would need access to samples of OJs blood, Nicole's blood and Ron Goldmans blood to plant on the second glove. -Would need to know all this information and need all the blood samples (of OJ, Nichole and Ron) and the extra glove ready to plant at OJs home before the murders even occurred at Nicoles home. -Would need a vast network of conspirators to support his framing of OJ (blood samples to put on the second glove, someone to plant the first glove at the murder scene so there would be a reason to justify finding a "matching glove.") -Etc, etc, etc....... These distractions don't even make an intelligent person doubt the real evidence against OJs guilt for one second let alone prove anything close to a "reasonable doubt," LET ALONE PROVE ANYTHING "BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT." You literally need to be completely prejudice and closed-minded or completely mentally retarded to bother trying to defend OJ Simpson in the face of the real evidence against him. Yeah, Mark Fuhrman is racist, however that fact provides precisely ZERO reason to doubt the evidence against OJ. The jury was prejudice and/or mentally retarded. It's impossible for a non-prejudice or reasonably intelligent human being to conclude that OJ was not guilty or that the jury was competent.

[@mexi54]

Its obvious he wron those gloves because the glove has a cut on it so does his hand. How coinscienced. lol

[@Tahtiluv]

But they say he got the cut bc the gloves fell off

[@jiogcyihsugyiocjfdoivhphvw6821]

try that again

[@GemKash]

OJ’s facial expressions and reactions shows lack of self control. He’s guilty !

[@sha11235]

Who is the bailiff talking to on the phone in the background?

[@emo7636]

I can't stand the way Cochran behaves, strutting around like God's gift. 'All we want is a fair trial' he says, are you kidding? Such hypocrisy. All the defense team did from day one was play games, lie, and cry 'unfair' at every turn. I think all the defense attorneys knew he was guilty except for Cochran who just straight up didn't care.

[@marvinbrando722]

Are you real ? He is a lawyer for god sake

[@imadbasayev8541]

He certainly was "God's gift", along with Bailey and Scheck, compared to the bumbling lawyers and lying pigs who represented the State. OJ was innocent. Get over it.

[@johndeagle4389]

Cochran was one of the most corrupt lawyers in history.

[@marvinbrando722]

@@johndeagle4389 . Little kid.

[@markmac2206]

theres a reason "lawyer" sounds very similar to "liar". look at the idiots in the comments completely ignoring the pics of OJ wearing the gloves. they were HIS gloves. all the bull in the world wont change that.

[@drewlavay]

The glove pictures are pretty damning, but knowing that they didn't find OJ's DNA on either glove makes the entire thing just look like a debacle.

[@mutedmutiny9542]

yes they did find OJ's DNA on the gloves... where did you hear they didn't ?

[@gunitundaboss2404]

Rip Johnny

[@rayray.0]

That deputy in the background is still on the phone

[@thetrialofthecentury]

OJ was photographed wearing dark leather gloves before Nicole purchased the 2 pairs of gloves from Bloomingdales. This video shows him wearing dark leather gloves on December 15, 1990, 3 days before Nicole made her purchase. kzbin.info/www/bejne/nqjVeGCEfsl6gMU Edit: If OJ is wearing the Aris Leather Light gloves in those photos and videos, I wonder why none of his DNA was found on the glove recovered from Bundy. In addition, the only DNA of his found on the glove recovered from Rockingham was in the same spot Colin Yamauchi testified to spilling his reference blood sample while handling the glove.

[@cameron_fairchild]

Good catch. Thank you again.

[@thetrialofthecentury]

👍

[@Courtney-R]

@@cameron_fairchild hrr

[@at1970]

Can’t forget those “ugly ass shoes” he would never own either…

[@_s_4412]

Not the same gloves. These are black not medium brown like he's seen wearing in all the other footage shown.

[@sha11235]

Imagine if it was the Bears against the Washington Redskins. People today would wonder, what team is that?

[@sha11235]

Today, it would probably have been easier for Rubin to contact all the other glove companies with the Internet as it is today.

[@philipwilliams1754]

Idiot,they could've cut the gloves open,and extract DNA.They could still do it today.

[@itsdheeraja]

21:37 LMAO 😂

[@christopherrankin4769]

I like the picture of OJ with the late Sam Wyche! RIP, Sam!

[@daffyduckfan4478]

Where was the glove position on Orenthal for it to fall at rockingham?

[@brianfreeman8124]

He had in his back pocket like a batting glove lol

[@daffyduckfan4478]

@@brianfreeman8124 so why wasn’t there blood on the seat?

[@jiogcyihsugyiocjfdoivhphvw6821]

it was in mark fuhrmans hands

[@uram9440]

@@daffyduckfan4478 idk ask him he will tell you what happened he was there or read his book.

[@daffyduckfan4478]

@@uram9440 He did not write that book. He allowed them to use his name to pay off the golddiggers.

[@kezzykez2471]

This is still an unsolved case so why aren't they checking out Jason Simpson. He hated Nicole and those kids he was angry with his dad for dumping the family for Nicole. Jason was furious on the day of the murders with Nicole because she humiliated him at his job by backing out of the big dinner plan where he was going to be the lead chef.

[@dompit9535]

Yeah no talk ever about finding the "real" killer, not from OJ at least 😂

[@zachgreenwood6313]

OJ would never take the fall for Jason. Please. He would have thrown his son under the bus in a heartbeat to save himself.

[@KevinShaughnessy-lf3vs]

​@@zachgreenwood6313 He saved himself anyway What's the point ?

[@zachgreenwood6313]

@@KevinShaughnessy-lf3vs that was my point. He would do anything to save himself, but he would not take the fall for his son.

[@brianwotherspoon7976]

R u gonna upload the rest of the episodes ?

[@thetrialofthecentury]

Yes I will.

[@brianwotherspoon7976]

@@thetrialofthecentury thanks I’m enjoying them, why don’t you put them all up at once or are they coming out weekly ?

[@thetrialofthecentury]

Glad you’re enjoying them. I uploaded every episode when the show came out in 2020. I didn’t have them saved though and my previous channel ended up getting terminated for unrelated reasons, so I had to start all over.

[@DixonCider256]

@@thetrialofthecentury keep them coming pls

[@SethMacLeod95]

@@thetrialofthecentury you’re the best, Kay!!

[@sha11235]

The "brown" family, I like that!!!!!!!

[@philipwilliams1754]

Who is Andrea Scott.????

[@chriswilgus4752]

I wear leather gloves for my work. When you sweating or they get wet they shrink. So, that's a b.s. excuses. Not accurate about that test on the gloves. Plus,those gloves sat outside for many hours before they had been found. They dried. Which makes them shrink..dah.🙄

[@Jeromemayle]

20:02 BOOM 34:38 The prosecution and press was so rude ready to smear him and he refused to go back.

[@money4eva495]

OJ paid 200k for those tapes only for the judge to excluded 95% of it and also not allow the jury to see furhman plead the 5th!!!! WTFFFF people say judge Ito was biased tot the defence absolutely NOT!

[@KevinShaughnessy-lf3vs]

The tapes of Nicole Brown Simpson ?

[@cindy9593]

Barry Scheck has the truth in his pocket.

[@meredithbirkholz5724]

Omg there are pictures of Simpson wearing the gloves that Nicole bought him that Furhmen planted based upon Kato grown man couch surfer’s belief there was an earthquake near his air conditioning unit. Unbelievable.

[@lisakaye3919]

Why was ron’s blood and not nicole’s blood found in the bronco? Why weren’t there any bloody shoe prints or traces if blood in the carpet of the bronco?

[@Jim.Jim.32]

Miss, both Ron and Nicoles blood was found in the Bronco in total less than 1cm which is width of a fingernail. Further, a partial footprint was in the Bronco - likely from Fuhrman after he entered the Bronco after standing in pools of blood at crime scene.

[@QuatMan]

The cops that planted it there ran out of time to make it believable.

[@gingerriviera3654]

Does anyone know why (legally/procedurally) Ito was allowed to maintain as the judge in this case?

[@jiogcyihsugyiocjfdoivhphvw6821]

yes

[@cherrylow9818]

That’s a good question & I’ve asked myself the same. He’s pathetic

[@iPro3million]

For what legal or procedural reason should he have been taken off the case?

[@javiermori1710]

I had a mad crush on Marcia Clark through this trial. Especially when she switched up hairdo. It's so attractive when she is up there arguing her points. Too bad LAPD really muffed up collecting crime scene and were just sloppy and unprofessional in some areas. The defense exploited that big time. Marcia Clark was a hottie but she could have handled case differently.

[@Clickbait86]

Y was the fbi involved? Idk this was a federal issue

[@Cocotaso.shaker]

I think they can be asked/invited to assist on cases

[@pommiebears]

For experts. That’s the only reason. FBI has a whole range of experts that individual states don’t have at hand.

[@andrerobinson2923]

2 mafia hit men were engaged in a conversation with Det. Philip Vanadder who talked about the OJ case with them.

[@sha11235]

Don't tell him to throw the gun out the window. Somebody will find it and probably use it to kill someone else.

[@bielefeldundmehr2461]

There were several police cars driving right behind him. So they would have picked up the gun instantly.

[@barefaceguddah]

How is it oj blood mixed when oj only had a cut on his hand? Cover up

[@qualateel1076]

The glove expert on top of his shit😆

[@StoicStud]

Shame on the jury they got it all wrong and shame on oj team say there names Nicole and ron😢😢

[@annemontanaro3795]

The defense is doing anything and everything to undermine the Prosecution by referring to the evidence as Contaminated or altered to appear to show OJs blood mixed with both victims blood and to assert the Police planted evidence AND was racist framing Simpson in spite of his physical abuse against Nicole and the repeated calls by Nicole to the Simpson household to report that abuse. In addition this shows the defenses fears if the jury got more than a moment to be informed of the physical abuse and to more than a moment to consider the physical as PROOF that OJ murdered Nicole and Ron Goldman to eliminate an unexpected witness to Nicole's murder.

[@jumpropestairs6129]

27 was th3 defenceman late

[@jumpropestairs6129]

15 20. Glove

[@tuphelo]

Wasn't the 1000$ a sanction against Shapiro and not Marcia? So then what's the governor talking about 26:33 🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔

[@markequinox]

No it was toward Marcia Clark for challenging the judge.

[@sevipek5857]

This case was poorly done from the outset. He was touched by an angel for this but they got him back. In Vegas.

[@willymcpeters2982]

Good

[@KevinShaughnessy-lf3vs]

​@@willymcpeters2982 What's the point? That everybody screwed up so it's a guilty verdict ?

[@FallenAngel53]

26:04...😁 I thought it was hilarious

[@jadedheartsz]

no

[@robskeys88]

So.. those are the gloves he used to slaughter two people??? So this 100% proves he's guilty???🤷‍♂️🤦‍♂️

[@KevinShaughnessy-lf3vs]

No ! The glove was outside for 7 hrs before it was found

[@milart12]

Of course, the gloves don't, in and of themselves, prove that OJ killed Nicole. But because they are very rare, and were worn by the killers, they are EXTREMELY incriminating.

[@brianfreeman8124]

Oj had a mask kit... Guilty

[@Parish197]

ED SULLIVAN SHOW ,OJ SIMPSON CASE ,AND SEPT 11, 2001. MOST WATCHED ON 📺 BEFORE COMPUTERS AND PHONES...

[@daffyduckfan4478]

White people think the O.J. Simpson verdict is the worst thing that happened to them even over September 11th.

[@honiotes1]

youtube didn't exist during 9/11 but the internet & cell phones existed~

[@jiogcyihsugyiocjfdoivhphvw6821]

r u drunk

[@AlexRodriguez-dm8kq]

Leather gloves are ugly and scary

[@TomLeach-dd8cl]

I guess if you have enough money you've not getting convicted eben if your blood is all over the victims