Omega Aqua Terra Vs Rolex Explorer

Check out this watch and others at Chronext:
www.chronext.c...
Hands-on review of the 2 amazing luxury watches: Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra and the Rolex Explorer 36mm
#Omega #Rolex #BarkAndJack
rolex,rolex explorer,barkandjack,bark and jack,omega aqua terra,omega,omega aqua terra white dial,rolex explorer 36mm 2021,rolex explorer 36,omega review,rolex explorer 2,rolex explorer 39mm,rolex explorer review,rolex explorer 2021,watch review,rolex review,rolex explorer 1,rolex explorer alternatives,rolex explorer homage,rolex explorer ii 16570,omega aqua terra 38mm,omega aqua terra 41mm,omega aqua terra blue,rolex vs omega,

[@00-Fresh-Snow-00]

My head says Omega. My heart says Rolex. My wallet says neither. 😅

[@TommyRibs]

Save up, squirrel away money here and there, and in a year or two, you will have the cash that you need.

[@asiantimepieces]

lol I am with you

[@simplyhack7683]

when you live in third world country with a meal cost only 0.5 dollars.. just me and my already expensive 21 dollar casio

[@TRUYORK718]

Fax

[@JK-ww8dn]

Well said. I feel like I would be happy with the omega but I would always have that craving for the explorer. The explorer has always been my dream watch and intended to get it at some point in my life I just have to be patient.

[@evh4611]

The moment Omega puts micro adjustment on every model, the brand will be fearsome. Same for Grand Seiko

[@dreitzell78]

You are spot on. Have the blue AT, can never get it just right on the bracelet. However, that rubber strap is THE best!

[@jswede1]

Love GS. Have 2, looking to buy a 3rd (sbga231), but man I wish their bracelets matched the quality and innovation of what they are attached to.

[@thejfer01]

@@jswede1 hahha same here, I only own one, hated the bracelet but I was lucky enough and the bracelet fits perfectly!

[@negrojenkins]

@Richard Westwood Omega? Chinese bracelets? I think you're mistaken, bud

[@alfieakaronaldog]

Grand Seiko need to make a decent bracelet first! I would look at a White Birch If they did. It would probably be a bit small though. Omega Bracelets are not great looking either IMO.

[@beginningbourbon7385]

I’m still a “Noob” to the watch game, but to me the greatest attribute a watch can have is accessibility. I can find / not have to wait 18-24 months to get an Omega. That fact alone has me side with Omega. Brilliant timepiece that I can actually purchase.

[@facetiousmonkey5322]

This is an unpopular take but, the lack of accessibility is partially what makes a watch (or anything) desirable. Even Mr. Spock said "you may find that having is not so pleasing a thing after all as wanting. It is not logical, but it is often true."

[@996rick]

@@facetiousmonkey5322 You're 100% correct, the lack of availability is what's driving the hype. Rolex watches aren't 3x Omega watches (they might not even be better at all), but the lack of availability turns it into a status symbol rather than just a watch - which is an entirely different type of market.

[@996rick]

I honestly am curious of the math of consumers they're alienating (myself) vs consumers who are now 'in' because it's a status symbol. If that bubble bursts (which almost all do) are the folks they alienated just gonna come back? I will have probably moved on.

[@beginningbourbon7385]

@@facetiousmonkey5322 Totally agree. I think within a watch (or any hobby) you have “status” displayed in two ways. 1. I am wearing something that not everyone can afford. 2. (Especially with Rolex) I have something that not everyone can afford, and even those that can have a most difficult time finding / acquiring. I collect bourbon and it is the same thing. You have to have the money to purchase rare bottles, but more importantly, the relationships that bring access to fine bottles. Or, you play the “Rolex Game” of wait 1-2 years to maybe get something.

[@beginningbourbon7385]

@@996rick I’ve Moved on, but in 5 years if I can get a Pepsi GMT for $9300 at an AD I would have a hard time passing!!!

[@nabilsiddiqui1074]

You don’t know how long i waited for this video, cheers Adrian.

[@BarkandJack]

Thanks for watching Nabil.

[@dinispaulino7512]

The only thing I'm not a fan of is the polished center links. Besides that, what a killer watch!!!

[@722georgetonorge]

For real, I can't stand those center links.

[@Anonymouslyme1]

rail master then?

[@omegawatchfan]

It is super easy to have them brushed. Like a 5 minute inexpensive job for any jeweler.

[@lonewolfemcquade8133]

Scratch 🧲 magnet

[@andytiller4528]

I tried a 41mm green dial on this week?I'm sold on it. Rolex are a bit of a joke now,stupid false market prices, manufactured waiting lists,and for what. A watch that collectors can't now appreciate. Omega every time

[@GarryChoo]

I wanted the Rolex Explorer but after waiting several months and not being able to source one locallly, I got the Aqua Terra in blue (38mm). After wearing it for a while, it grew on me. I really love this watch. It's well made and the details like the anti reflective coating, the lines on the face and the hour markers make this a better choice for me than the Explorer.

[@erif-gd4ci]

I have a blue aqua terra and a black dial submariner....I like both tremendously...but I enjoy the aqua terra more, which surprises most people

[@explorerjlc1743]

bought the AT as a compromise too. Was super happy with it, but after a year I sold it and got the explorer. Hard to beat a true classic.

[@marktn9851]

Mine’s a black original version, totally agrees when u mentioned “grew on me”…

[@isluderea8322]

but still ... you wanted a Rolex and not an Omega

[@johncgr800]

Now that you’ve had your AT 38 for a few years, how’s the polished center links on the bracelet holding up? I’m most likely going to pull the trigger on a blue dial 41 but I’m now wondering if the 38 would look more balanced. Time to go to an AD and put them on wrist.

[@TheyCallMeKent]

The aqua terra is my grail. saving every month to hopefully being able to afford it in a year or 2. the Aqua terra world timer aswell is just stunning

[@Jayantahit]

Good luck bro! I was in the same boat. I finally managed mine this year. Wish you all the best!

[@TheyCallMeKent]

@@Jayantahit thank you very much! Congratulations on the hard work!

[@jimlittle5769]

I have the green AT. Its a truly great watch. I am also getting the World Timer. It is on order. Should get that in a week or two.. Bracelet for the AT, blue rubber strap for the World Timer. I thing I'll get the green strap for the AT as well.

[@bigmeech8715]

I had the green AT thought it was ok but not great…flicked it in the same week and got a sub.

[@ZeroSOFInfinity]

Just get the Worldtimer. That watch alone can be a one-watch collection. Its that good.

[@Jay-xr3sb]

Wish the Aqua Terra didn't have polish centre links. The older ones didn't, the first 8500 AQ, with vertical pattern, blue dial is a classic.

[@WH-hi5ew]

You'd probably find with daily wear that the polished centre links would lose their lustre over a few months. Alternatively stick it on a a leather strap.

[@Justin6477]

@@WH-hi5ew I'm about a year in and so far mine haven't. The only thing stopping me from putting it on a NATO is that it's the only watch I have on a bracelet right now.

[@josephburton3232]

Yeah, that's a huge downside for me. I'm sure you could take it to a professional jeweler or watchmaker and they could brush them out.

[@EssenceOfTrance]

@@josephburton3232 Probably but it's always a risk that the job is not well done.

[@Jay-xr3sb]

Not just the maintainece, its the look. Brushed suits everything and polished does not.

[@watchguy8537]

The Aquaterra has a date function and the bracelet has polished center links. The Explorer has none of that. In the Omega lineup, the Aquaterra competes with the Rolex DateJust and not the Explorer.

[@dgbucko]

If omega offered more watches without date, not just special additions, they would have a killer lineup. I wear a 2004 Railmaster, which replaced my Explorer and is the perfect watch. A no date AT with micro adjust would be my next watch without any doubt.

[@wilsonfreitas8418]

No date and bracelets with micro adjustment would be even better.

[@gpearce11]

@@dgbucko To be fair, according to market research apparently most customers prefer a date when given the option, and if it's done as cleanly as Omega does with the AT and SM300M why not take it? If the date detracts from the design then I agree (I generally prefer a date, but would never own a date Rolex), but a subtle 6 o'clock date that's there when you need it, but unnoticed when you don't, is welcome to me. I can't disagree about the lack of micro-adjustment (hopefully the new Constellation clasp is added to the AT and RM soon), but as I'd personally get the 41mm AT (with 20mm bracelet) I'd put the micro-adjustment clasp off the SM300 on it and call it a day.

[@dgbucko]

@@gpearce11 99%of watches have dates, to cater for those that prefer them. For those that don't it is very frustrating.

[@FunWithAJ]

Appreciate the walk and talk intro like old times.

[@BarkandJack]

I prefer them. I sound too fake when I’m just talking straight to camera.

[@JohnLFjellstad]

I love my Aqua Terra (41mm, blue dial). Love the sunburst effect. I spent months trying on different sizes and colours before I decided on the one I ended up with. Is the Explorer better? I don't know. It's not like I can go walk into an AD and try one on. And that makes all the difference. (I also have a rule of not buying over retail)

[@BetamaxBabe]

This is easy: Aqua Terra all day, every day. The only Rolex that would win is a ceramic Submariner at the same price, and since that will never happen, AT comes out on top!

[@christianblanche1569]

Aquaterra 38mm in blue sunburst dial is the best looking everyday simple watch PERIOD 🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰 SATISFACTION to look at the front and the back 10/10. Prices have to be backwards comparing to rolex

[@MultiTopgearfan]

Man, that Aqua Terra just looks gorgeous. Never liked light-coloured dials but this one is an exception. Always liked simple watches with centre seconds, the fact that it also has a date complication is a huge bonus. The want is really strong with this one.

[@Blueski43]

Prices of both are ridiculous. I feel so sorry for anyone buying a modern watch these days ... I'd bet Rolex/Omega are making these for less than three hundred pounds each ...

[@tim462]

Talking Seamaster Models: what are your Thoughts on the new Seamaster 300 Models? :) The „vintage“ looking ones 😄

[@henryedge8914]

Waiting for a video on this, they look so cool

[@mrparker4597]

Love it. Wish it was 40mm or just under. Although who am I kidding, I could never afford one!

[@chriszivoder2650]

Stunning watches, I agree, just making them slightly smaller would be amazing.

[@jonathanmiles897]

The Omega Railmaster is also an underated explorer alternative.

[@fredericniang4532]

Omega Railmaster = Rolex Milgauss

[@muatao9943]

I agree!

[@bigjes]

Yea it’s cool but just get the aqua Terra it looks better

[@noeldavis618]

For me, many of Omega’s watches are too thick. The Aquaterra 38mm is 13.2mm thick. That’s dive watch territory. By contrast, the Explorer (14270) is 11mm thick.

[@sashimifr]

couldn't agree more. Even in the diver realm, 13mm is my max. My first decent acquisition was the seamaster 300 pre-coaxial. Still the thinnest diver around ; mines ticking less than +/-0.5s/day and is 20y old.

[@gpearce11]

Pretty sure 13.2mm is the thickness of the 41mm, with the thicker 8900 bawled calibre. The 38mm is 12.5mm thick; still thicker than the Explorer, but not by much (and you get a display caseback and 50m more WR, so I guess it's a trade off).

[@rebeccawarren2976]

I'm back to work after these bloody lockdowns, working hard and saving money and this summer i'm buying Aqua Terra 38 in black. One of the best everyday watches!

[@ashleyg6479]

I think the aqua terra is a little underrated …it’s a lovely piece and is good value for money ..I was making the same choice but went for the Explorer 214270 ..no regrets !

[@blackwood3243]

Good watch but the bracelet is terrible, no micro adjustability and the edges are sharp when they should be beveled. Just don't buy it if your looking for a good bracelet.

[@vianouche1]

@@blackwood3243 which one are you talking about ? The 214270 bracelet is not as you describe at all...

[@blackwood3243]

@@vianouche1 220.10.38.20.03.001

[@Uncle_Monkey]

Aqua Terra hands down. Date, exhibition case back, no comparison needed.

[@Anonymouslyme1]

No micro adjust on bracelet so it’s no go for me. Stunner otherwise, pity.

[@wilsonfreitas8418]

@@Anonymouslyme1 exactly.

[@blackwood3243]

@@Anonymouslyme1 Yep, total idiots.

[@sultanr932]

True price. Explorer:10k+. Aquaterra: give it or take 4-5k. That makes a sense

[@94jmbottaro]

@@sultanr932 explorer is 7k and you can easily get it for 5k. nobody buys the explorer

[@ajdhill]

I'd buy the Aqua Terra because I think it's the better looking of the two, especially with the blue dial.

[@BrittPearceWatches]

Ohhhhh mate. I’m such a scumbag. I don’t care about my name on the papers. JUST GIMME THE WATCH! 😂😂🙈🙈

[@markp9416]

Sorry Adrian but I don’t agree that Rolex and omega are in different ranges. Maybe on brand recognition but not quality.

[@piotrkrolikowski5903]

He's biased towards rolex so hardly surprising he thinks that. He openly admits he's a Rolex fanboy.

[@patrickbateman529]

They are wildly different in quality. Rolex uses better steel which is more expensive and tougher to shape, It's all done by hand. Omega components are mass produced and 'hand assembled'.

[@markp9416]

@@patrickbateman529 Rolex’s are not hand shaped. They are totally machined and assembled by hand as well. 904 steel is less corrosive then 316 but it’s softer. 904 handles scratches better but dents easier.

[@horologywatchmaking13]

@@patrickbateman529 which world you're living at to know those hilarious informations 😄

[@patrickbateman529]

@@horologywatchmaking13 Look it up on Google.

Aquaterra is the more beautiful watch.

[@JRW33]

If Omega throw in an 'on the fly' adjust clasp, then for me, the Omega becomes the obvious choice.

[@marketingsuccess2637]

I’m curious if the new bracelet on the Seamaster 300 will work on the 41 mm aqua terra? Then you have problem solved.

[@markdegaute2125]

Great point James!

[@PhilipWing]

then they couldn't have the butterfly style clasp that actually hides the clasp. I do agree with you though, I'd prefer a standard clasp with an on the fly adjustment over a streamlined look for sure.

[@1148bucknasty]

I love my railmaster but will probably sell it because of how much I hate the butterfly bracelet

[@MrTubens]

I love my AT first generation 😍

[@visi5649]

For me it’s the Aqua Terra all the way - however it would have to be the 41mm with the 8900 movement. 60 hr power reserve, twin barrel co-axial movement which provides constant torque release for all of its 60 hr power reserve for constant accuracy, 15000 gauss, silicon balance bridge for shock resistance, METAS certified with movement in case to 6 positions, bi-directional automatic winding, etc etc. Stick it on a rubber strap for sporty looks, or a leather strap for classy looks. Such a versatile everyday usable timepiece. The dial does amazing things in various light conditions too. I’ve heard as a piece of hardware this watch being described as the best watch money can buy under £50k?

[@visi5649]

@@lnielsen9866 - Noted. I have owned the 8900 Aqua Terra for the last two years and it’s a stunning timepiece! I am however contemplating swapping it for the 38mm 8800. As you know the only other difference is that the 8800 has quick set date, whereas the 8900 has quick set hour function. I am leaning towards the smaller timepiece though. Last year I purchased a Hamilton Khakhi Field automatic as an everyday watch at it is also stunning. Just as accurate as the 8900. However, having now worn the 38mm Hamilton on a daily basis I think I prefer the smaller Aqua Terra …

[@visi5649]

@@lnielsen9866 - Yes I totally agree! 37-39mm with around 10mm thickness is my new preferred dimension of choice thanks to the Hamilton. I agree that either the quick set hour or quick set date are just as functional as each other! I’d be happy with either! I think the quick set date is probably more useful to be honest. If I don’t wear the 8900 for a while it takes a lot of quick set hour turning to achieve the required date, whereas quick set date would definitely be quicker! I think I may just make the swap …

[@mclumino]

A disadvantage for me is the height of the Aqua Terra. Especially at the 38mm version. In this point the Explorer wins.

[@fengtang9139]

The 38mm Aqua Terra is 12.3mm thick, versus the Explorer 36mm is 12mm thick. They are pretty much in the same ball park. The Aqua Terra appears to be thicker because of the thicker lugs and dome crystal.

[@n.h187]

I don't get why would anyone would pay £7K for a (1)14270 when they could get a 124270 with new tech for £5.15K , Yeah you got to mess around with the AD but it's not like your asking for a sub or GMT.

[@yragsvids8592]

Still not sold on a tool watch without a date complication….. Aqua Terra wins hands down over the Rolex…

[@bgandjsco1]

Now for me i dont like the date complication

[@yragsvids8592]

@@bgandjsco1 I get that some people have strong views on watches with a date complication, but for me personally and especially if we’re talking “tool” watches, a day to day wear has to show the date….otherwise what’s the point?….

[@BarkandJack]

WHICH WATCH SHOULD I BORROW NEXT? Check out Chronext: www.chronext.co.uk/spring-sale?

[@therapiststeve3294]

The the Rolex SS Pepsi on an Oyster bracelet. I'm in the US looking at the US version of their site so I'm not sure if that's available to you.

[@brentchittenden1]

I own a 41mm Aqua Terra and absolutely love it. Such a great everyday watch.

[@Joebo31]

The aquaterra is probably my favorite watch that I don't think I will ever own. Every model looks amazing but none of them truly excite me

[@bigmacdaddy1234]

Sux to be you.

[@Joebo31]

@@bigmacdaddy1234 that was unnecessarily rude lol

[@jt1687]

I have the exact same feelings for the Seamaster 300. Love the idea of the watch but the actual end product just doesn't do anything for me :( .

[@djdc81]

Agree. Hence I sold mine and I had the nicer model on a rubber strap

[@autonomy_]

I love the dial, but I think the case and bracelet need a serious rework. It just does not feel cohesive or seamless. Also quick adjust on a bracelet needs to be on all luxury watches of this price point, IMHO.

[@gregfoster9108]

Another great video. I got my Aqua Terra 2 years ago (the one with the yellow and black seconds hand). It was a pre owned, only a couple of years old, box and papers, from a local independent AD. It was nearly half the retail price! I absolutely love it. To me they are almost like a Grand Seiko. People that know about watches really appreciate them. Keep up the great work 👍

[@bani_niba]

I love the styling of the Aqua Terra. The Explorer is pretty boring and generic.

[@fraserhorn7]

I love the Aqua Terra, particularly that white dial, although I prefer it on the rubber strap. One of the next watches on my hit list.

[@mazrashid6549]

The white dial really pops on the rubber!

[@sfmaberk1985]

Always aqua terra!!!! I bought the 41mm version with the olive dial last we. Love it.

[@mi4an_og]

with the green dial is my grail watch( Congratulations bro!!

[@Justin6477]

I own the full-size AT in green; it's my first higher-end watch and definitely a purchase I'm happy with. I like that it has versatility, but the details still feel dynamic. I tend to find Rolex a bit too austere and stoic for my tastes.

[@stdalex]

Aqua Terra every day and twice on Sunday. No comparison.

[@Matter-of-Time]

Both fantastic watches. I suspect the Rolex Explorer 1 will stand the test of time better as the dial on the Omega AT is less timeless and will point to a particular period in watch collecting. I do prefer the AT options as the blue and Sedna gold is very sharp, the green dial looks fantastic and the black dial does look classic. With this said, if it were a single watch to wear and have nothing else in the collection, I can see the Explorer 1 being my choice. But I’m in the other minority who likes the gold 369 over the lumed version - seems more versatile to me.

[@synlion]

what period of watch collecting are we in and how does the AT represent it?

[@johngisbourne7197]

Fuck Rolex, never again. Simple as that.

[@Treetopflyer777]

Love the AT. Having said that I just bought a SM300M. Because I couldn’t stomach paying 3X the price for a sub. WRT price, I think one has to compare what the watches can ACTUALLY be had for. Let’s face it- most of us can’t get a sub or explorer at an AD. So a grey market AT vs grey market Explorer. The Rolex goes for >2X the price of the AT. Fine if you can afford it, but pretty much makes the decision for you if you can’t. In Canada, subs are selling for 18 grand. Explorers selling for 15 grand. I bought a brand new SM300m for 6k. A full 1/3 the price of a sub. I simply couldn’t justify it. On paper from an AD, they’re only a couple grand apart. But that just simply isn’t reality. Great video man!!!

[@leonardtabone8670]

The Aqua Terra by far is the best bang for your buck in the luxury watch segment. I prefer the 41mm with the 8900 movement.

[@stevenbriandunn5648]

I own this as well and love it. Keeps great time as well

[@SGT-MACK9096]

@@stevenbriandunn5648 I have the orange second hand Golf edition, 41 mm orange Omega Nato strap, Yes I love this watch.

[@jimlittle5769]

The 8909 movement is great! What color is yours?

[@Shavenuw129]

Technically, Omega (nor Rolex) are in the luxury watch bracket.

[@manuel_winde]

@@Shavenuw129 says who?

[@JaxWatchesandEDC]

Omega is the superior watch, with the superior movement. Rolex has the superior hype, that’s about it at this point in history. Just my opinion.

[@heiner71]

Something off about the case shape and the proportions of bracelet to case on the Aqua Terra.

[@TheChadWork2001]

The biggest problem with the Aqua Terra is: 1) Crown to stiff to turn 2) Crown slippery because it effectively has not knurling Compare this crown with the one on the Tudor Pelagos and there is no chance for the Aqua Terra. Omega must change that slippery crown.

[@ArnavSenguptaPlus]

Adrian, get her this Aqua Terra so that you can wear it too. The Aqua Terra looks stellar in that white dial!

[@HarryBunnGRVOTV]

I love the aqua terra & the fact that i can actually go into a shop, try it on & then actually buy it is a big deal, whereas with the rolex that’s not an option so it gets ruled out. I have a speedy pro and a seamaster pro, so difficult to pull the trigger on the aqua terra. 🤔

[@richardbrown8099]

@@whereRbearsTeeth You waited for an explorer? Why?

[@horologywatchmaking13]

The Explorer is a lesser watch than the Aquaterra but then it's more expensive 😅 Let alone the ridiculous higher market price. Makes no sense. Omega is a higher brand than Rolex, but they offer more with a lower price.

[@ErikL727]

In my life, Omega was the brand that was impressed upon me as the "I made it" watch. The AT is an amazing watch and a fantastic "do it all" selection. The Explorer does not inspire me nearly as much. Great video!

[@winduncan9818]

I was thinking of a Explorer and am now leaning toward a blue Aqua Terra. It's a great watch I can actually buy, VS having to suck off a Rolex dealer to get one.

[@daviddicicco195]

I think the AT is a superb value, and I prefer it over the seamaster 300. I feel it’s more versatile and I don’t have a need for the helium escape valve and stronger water resistance. 150m more than meets my needs. I think the AT has the added value over the Explorer of being acquirable tomorrow if anyone wants one. Thanks for the video Adrian!

[@jasonm9335]

Aqua Terra everyday!

[@chriscon8463]

I love the Aquaterra; it’s beautiful! I don’t care for the 19mm lugs, butterfly clasp, and lack of micro-adjustments, though. If Omega addressed these “issues” it would be perfect.

[@wescobts]

Aqua Terra for me thank you, I love the brand, and I need a date complication.

[@jollyrob]

The 41mm blue AT is as close to being perfect as any watch for me. If I could afford one 🤞 I know I'd neither hesitate or regret it.

[@richardclowes7428]

I bought one last year. Can confirm it is awesome. Brand new from a dealer for £4,100 which hopefully puts it 20% closer to feeling attainable.

[@dreitzell78]

You won't regret it. It is superb.

[@opiew737]

All irrelevant as you can’t buy the Rolex (from the shop). Omega all the way!

[@Fjallrav]

Fair point.

[@PhilipWing]

Always loved the Aqua Terra. It's a great balance between sporty and dressy, and works for pretty much every occasion. The thing that bothers me about it is how the minute hand has an arrow head and the hour hand doesn't. The tip of the hour hand always looked to me like it broke off. Just my personal taste

[@lavykhurana]

True. Rolex looks like it copied Benz logo.

[@zakstephenson4545]

bro now that youve said that i cant unsee it xDD

[@rickfanning5647]

Isn’t a Railmaster the real comparison to an Explorer? Also, the first rule of investment is buy low and sell high. If you are looking at investment, the Rolex boat may have sailed. Unless, of course, you are a seller . . .

[@jaysterling26]

I concur: if one can - buy the Rolex, enjoy it , then flip it for the AT when (?) that has a sensible lug size and possibly no top AR..

[@brynroberts9880]

I've definitely switch my focus from wanting an explorer to wanting an Aquaterra. I was always a bit worried that with the ex I'd find it wanting, as an everyday/frequent wear, because it doesn't have a date, which is something I like. For this reason and now that the 39mm ex is no more and prices on grey market are beyond any sense I've definitely discounted it. As far as the AT and the 300 are concerned is the AT is just a nicer looking watch.

[@kefren1322]

If a watch brand doesn`t make it easy for you to buy their watches, then what`s the reason you`d spend your money with them? Rolex is 101% at fault for their current situation, meaning long waiting lists, grey market sales and so on. One of my grail watches is the DateJust 36, but I would not spend more than retail, nor wait 6 months for it. Omega Aqua Terra vs Rolex Explorer I, I would go 100% for the Omega. No hate for the Explorer, it`s a very simple, classic, yet amazing watch, but the 8800 movement from Omega it`s top of the class.

[@jwdepriest]

I WANT to like it, but in person the AT just doesn’t quite sing. Can’t quite put my finger on it. Functionally it needs a thinner case and a more-easily adjustable clasp.

[@jwdepriest]

@@whereRbearsTeeth yep, agree the Speedy pro moon watch may be the only exception. Good call.

[@Not_me9791]

A question... Is there a watch cartel? All Submariners selling in Chronext are above 10k... But there are so many for sale!!! Is just illogical!! I'm also a record collector and I've bought records 50x their original value, but there was only 1 for sale... All this sh@t about Rolex seems to be a scam!

[@roy_eappen]

Wish people would stop comparing Omega to Rolex when they both have good things and can compliment each other well.

[@michaelbishop9157]

Draws KZbin hits - so they keep doing it

[@djdc81]

Agree.

[@Marco-uo6np]

Not true at all that Omega movement is so much better than 3130. 3130 movement is a tried and tested workhorse movement. It's supremely accurate and super shock resistant and and still somewhat a-magnetic. Service intervals can last way over 10 years in many instances. It's a movement that was way ahead of its time. Also co-axial escapements don't require huge amounts of lubrication, I think you can figure out why Omega co-axial movements are well lubricated (something called planned obsolescence). Just because something is anti-magnetic doesn't make hugely better. And frankly who cares if it can withstand 15,000 gauss... no one unless you're a doctor or a scientist ever encounters forces that are even remotely close to that level.

[@ei8hty5ive]

I had this exact dilemma back in 2018. My heart was saying AT, my head was saying Explorer (and it's better residuals)... In the end I chose the AT and have no regrets. After almost 3 years of ownership, it still brings me joy every time I wear it. If I have any criticism of the watch, it's with the butterfly clasp. While the clasp is elegant and lovely to look at, it has no adjustment movement which is mighty inconvenient in the summer heat. Another great vid.

[@nathanf1934]

I wouldn’t say the new Explorer is less accurate. I’d much prefer to gain time, than lose time over a 24hr period.

[@Mythicregard]

Totally agree.

[@Justinpiano1987]

I’m just happy to here you say “Oh-may-guh” instead of “Oh-mee-guh”. 🤣🤣🤣

[@djdc81]

No.

[@SoCalWatchReviews]

Crazy how you can film crazy B-roll like this from a hotel room 👏. You’re very talented Adrian 🙌 . BTW that Omega is beautiful ❤️

[@Painperview]

Great video man! I was choosing between these exact two watches. I ended up buying the Aqua Terra (38mm blue dial). The main reason tbh was the availability. The whole buying experience was simply better with Omega. I felt like if I was paying this amount of money for a watch I didn't want to end up in some queue and have to wait for months to get what I actually payed for. Anyway, I'm extremely happy with Aqua Terra! Although I don't think you can go wrong with any of these watches.

[@steelsteez6118]

Rolex are morons for discontinuing the 39mm explorer. Aqua Terra all the way.

[@alexpiptom]

I’m afraid it has to be the Rolex explorer in my eyes, it’s so simple and classy.

[@mkyhou1160]

I used to own one (39, no way I could do the 36) - I think for me, over time, it was more, boring and dull.

[@alexpiptom]

@@mkyhou1160 I have a submariner date but I like the under the radar look of the explorer.

[@patrickbateman529]

@@mkyhou1160 To each his own, Adrian himself has talked enthusiastically about his Explorer and says it's the best watch he owns.

[@mkyhou1160]

@@patrickbateman529 fair enough. I think it’s a reasonable choice for purists / smaller guys. I have an AK now which is a better fit for me size wise (I have a wrist over 7) and visually is much more interesting in person. If I ever win the lottery or get a big promotion my dream would be a 40mm President (white gold or platinum), sort of this everyday style on steroids. Life’s too short to always be under the radar.

[@MrRevvvhead]

Aqua Terra is great, but the Explorer is the best time only watch. I always looked at the Aqua Terra as the affordable, available alternative to the Explorer. But as soon as you say alternative, what you are really saying is, it's the other one I want. So I stumped up for the Explorer, the AT would not have scratched the itch.

[@matthewa6346]

Adrian, so on your recommendation, I tried Chronext. Bought the Aqua Terra and delighted with the Chronext service. Great recommendation and fantastic watch!

[@Gnomeshoes91]

I adore my AT. The incredible rubber strap, good looks, and the hour jump complication (on the 8900 movement/41mm version) make it my default travel watch.

[@djdc81]

I used to think the same, I even bought it overseas, I too also had the Aqua Terra on a rubber strap, but have just traded it in for a Tudor Pelagos (blue).

[@Mythicregard]

I love jump hour movements for travel.

[@gabev6172]

What is your wrist size?

[@Gnomeshoes91]

@@gabev6172 16.5cm / ~6.5", and the 41mm AT fits me perfectly. Wrist shape matters though since lug to lug is the real measurement that matters across the span of your wrist.

[@Zed1776]

The explorer is just too plain. It’s true competition seems to me be retro pilot watches like Hamilton or Laco. At it’s price point Omega and Grand Seiko are better luxury watches.

[@andreaiacolina]

Nice comparison between the Aquaterra and the Explorer. Both great watches, but for me the AT easily wins for the design and for the movement that is far superior and beautifully decorated.

[@darrenaquilinapfso9903]

Great video Adrian, but i honestly think you got wrong the hierarchy thing.. Omega as a brand is on the same level as Rolex. Rolex is percieved as being higher... 😉

[@alphaTrader.oo1]

Omega win hands down for most contemporary timepiece

[@adipiric7316]

Omega AT is best all arounder and best bang for a buck in my opinion .. just the movment itself is worth the money. thats why i bouth one in 41mm silver with orange details

[@BooEsq04]

The AT has been on my radar for a one (luxury) watch collection. The things that stand out to me over the Explorer are: 1. Availability 2. Movement specs 3. Water resistance 4. Date complication 5. Jumping hour complication

[@trollse8714]

The fifth attribute only is only valid if you go for the 41mm version with the 8900 co-axial movement

[@doctorvins4979]

the Aqua Terra looks really nice, but I have small wrists. I like the 37 mm explorer 1 better, even with the price premium and lesser tech

[@jeromegold3216]

Omega all day every day

[@gabo312]

Same in here

[@apurvashethyt]

I don't want date window on my watches except quartz. So I would prefer Rolex

[@deathwatch962]

Me sitting here with the Two tone Explorer. Stop making my life difficult Jack.

[@BarkandJack]

The two tone Explorer is awesome!

[@richards3108]

Both are really nice pieces , but why must Omega put AR coatings on the top of a sapphire glass so that it scratches ?

[@HP-yz7rf]

Love my grey dial aqua terra with blue accents, bought if from an AD 2 years ago and haven’t taken it off. Such an underrated piece. Would love to see you do a comparison of the new Tudor black bay ceramic vs the seamaster 300 ceramic 👍🏼

[@HP-yz7rf]

Price has also jumped up by about £900 since then

[@JusttheWatch]

Give me the Aqua Terra. It has a date.

[@MrSiccu]

I always overlooked the AT, then I saw one in the metal...... What a watch!

[@gpearce11]

The Aqua Terra is my grail, so you can probably guess my preference. Comparing directly to the Explorer I (my second favourite Rolex behind the Skydweller) I love the AT's dial design, especially the subtle 6 o'clock date, and the display caseback. I wish it had the 2mm micro-adjust clasp off the new Constellation, but I've heard it's easy to swap the 20mm butterfly clasp on the 41mm (my choice) with the single fold micro-adjust clasp off the Speedy Racing 44mm, so I'd do that. I also agree that there's an issue with Omega's pricing. They seem determined to charge more for the "premium" 8900 calibre, hence why the 8800 powered SM300M is less than the 8900 powered Aqua Terra 41mm and Planet Ocean 600M 43.5mm. Unfortunately, this plan falls apart when smaller versions of 8900 watches (such as the 34/38mm AT and 39.5mm PO) cost exactly the same, despite having supposedly "cheaper" 8800 movements. That said, this is a comparison to Rolex, and the Aqua Terra could put its prices up by 10-15% and still be decent value compared to even the Oyster Perpetual, let alone the Explorer.

[@Paul_F_C]

I’m waiting patiently for the Explorer, but both beautiful watches

[@94jmbottaro]

where? they are super easy to find. your AD is fkin with you

[@DenisHauser]

Omega Aqua Terra 41! ;-)

[@joseperez6613]

Your straightforward delivery has got to be top-notch and among the best in the business. Cheers Adrian and hope for more great content!

[@24nathan]

98% of the people you encounter don't know about watches and only 2% who are probably in this group understand the value and technically of the watch we are wearing. So buy a watch you love to wear, both comfortable to your hand and your wallet. Just my piece of POV.

[@jakkalink]

Totally agree. They don't know what you're wearing?

[@stevesmith9943]

No contest...... I've owned both (well the 39mm explorer and the 41mm aqua terra) and its literally no contest.... The aqua terra bracelet is solidly built but the clasp is bloody awful..... It didn't wind as well, didn't feel as special.... If you're looking at omega barring the seamaster 300m and the speedmaster professional, look at rolex, tudor or even grand seiko......

[@stevesmith9943]

I don't like the quality of the pre 2010 rolex bracelets at all (they were for decades sub par compared to the quality of the watch), the new ones however are the pinnacle of watch bracelets period....i know some have piped up about the tudor pelagos bracelet being more innovative and comfortable with the unique micro adjust feature but I own this watch and it isn't the case at all........ I wear this watch on a rubber strap or a nato because I couldn't get a perfect fit, whereas the rolex oyster bracelet felt PERFECT....

[@SJCB27]

Aqua Terra v. Explorer 1? Mmmmm... Railmaster!

[@DavidDatura]

In general apart from chronographs, I really don’t like white dials on sports watches.

[@marcusrawlinson5024]

I agree, these are tool/everyday watches for good people with deep pockets so legibillity should be important. If you see them as luxury watches for the more impecunious I think you're missing the point.

[@DavidDatura]

@@marcusrawlinson5024 I don’t, it’s just a matter of taste in my case. A white dial on a dress watch can look elegant. On a sports watch not so much. I couldn’t care less how much or little they might cost.

[@MiataBRG]

Ffs Adrian, stop calling everything 'This guy'! St Paul's Cathedral? Love the channel but 'this guy' (when applied to a watch, bucket, cathedral, tin of soup) has got to be the laziest and most overused phrase on KZbin. We've got a rich language, use some more of it :)

[@Mythicregard]

Great comment!

[@davidb5720]

Great vid Aidrian, I love these match ups! it’s hard not to be biased as I have an Aqua terra blue dial (with the vertical teak effect dial) but....... it’s still definitely the better watch. The explorer is superb and it’s just a case of what takes your fancy. You couldn’t go wrong with either. The Rolex name will get more admirers but does that make a better brand?

[@alfieakaronaldog]

Nice video as always. Really looking forward to the next one 😈 The Omega indices look like an older Seiko Monster, and it looks overall very Seiko to me. I like some Seiko’s so that’s not an insult, I just way prefer Rolex’s.