Patek Philippe "CUBITUS" - Here's everything you need to know

[@drdesign6886]

This is proof right here that the snobs will only call a watch a homage when it’s cheap. When it’s a luxury brand it gets some magical free pass.

[@iMoha46]

This is the Maen Manhattan. Good job on staying creative Patek

[@Dondaddyh]

The Maen is a great watch, horizontally striped instead of vertical

[@tomasportela5220]

And Maen ‘borrowed’ design cues from the Vacheron Constantin 2215 which was released on 1975

[@IsaiahFlickner-we9jd]

I was literally about to say that 😂. I have a Maen Manhattan and honestly think the concept and dimensions are better than this. Also the Manhattan is a homage of the not well known Vacheron Constantan ref. 2215 and I think it’s weird for a brand like Patek to be using a design that is so similar to there biggest competitors.

[@base853]

Beat me to it!

[@balazskertesz5010]

Or the Mido TV

[@errolmclaughlin1482]

Patek CEO absolutely taking the p*ss. “You clowns will buy anything we put out because you can’t get a Nautilus, so here”

[@hatchegg80]

and guess what? he'll be right lol

[@estradaarmory]

@@hatchegg80 because customers willingly feed these people's egos...

[@salimbendali8189]

@@hatchegg80 he has a huge margin for fucking up but that doesn't mean the company in unsinkable. he's already proven to be an abnoxious prick.

[@JusttheWatch]

Not a big fan of homages, especially when it's like 50 times more expensive than the Maen it's copying...

[@alejandrogavilan9996]

The maen is also an homage from the VC ref.2215 realesed in 1975

[@riocc]

@@alejandrogavilan9996 thank you, was about to say this... the cubitus is more an evolution of the naut

[@bngr_bngr]

GShock.

[@thilog5874]

@@riocc Evolution is normally better. This is a joke.

[@riocc]

@ ah, cause your objectivity overrides anyone else’s?

[@datta55]

This is the definition of "just because you can, doesnt mean you should..."

[@BrittPearceWatches]

🤣🤣 I think many would agree with this!

[@curious_loafer]

mate, that's a Maen

[@BrittPearceWatches]

🤣🙈

[@axelcoker242]

First thing that came to mind when I saw it. Patek should have just discontinued the Nautilus entirely.

[@carrerau7138]

And the IWC XX is a Laco Augsburg.

[@stephenbaluran3298]

Britt knew someone in the comments would say it. 😂

[@riocc]

no, the Maen is a cheap vacheron copy... this is a naut evo

[@AS-co8to]

The real "crime " here is the price. Its laughable that this is considered "an entry level" I can just imagine conversation between Patek executives: " we need a watch that younger, not only rich people can buy", "True that, what you think those people make", "Probably like a half dozen millions"

[@Bestow3000]

Even worse when you realized you can get cheaper with the Santos and have a better bracelet change system

[@alexmood6407]

Price is what makes Patek so desirable. There is 16 million Ultra-high-net-worth individuals (UHNWI) with a net worth of at least $30 million and this market is growing. It’s a market that’s more than enough for Patek. I don’t know why are watch enthusiasts so obsessed with watches that are Veblen goods. You can get watches that are just as good for a fraction of the price.

[@bngr_bngr]

This watch is a safe watch. To be sold in twenty years.

[@alexmood6407]

@@bngr_bngr I agree

[@waynemoore9951]

Let's get real here, this is rubbish. Same bracelets, same dials, same movement as in the aquanot's a reference to their silly 30m water resistance. It's took them 25 years to re hash a Glashutte Panorama which was launched in 1997. This is a dreadful move from Patek.

[@watchpapi]

Nautilus*

[@robertposteschild2353]

But it's a Patek so people will sell their kids for it

[@ccooper8785]

Hopefully Aliexpress will have loads of copies available next week so you can buy one to try it out for size.

[@nielslarsen1693]

Copies? You mean originals since they did these watches long before Patek. Patek is the copyer

[@vampire_kiril]

whoever designed this SHOULD BE FIRED.

[@cerealport2726]

fired out of a cannon...into the sun...

[@tingliu4982]

Thierry stern

[@vampire_kiril]

@@tingliu4982 im gonna give thierry a piece of my mind

[@AS-co8to]

Watch people said darndest things 😂 In a year, everyone will want one, and it will become another unobtainable Patek.

[@MichaelM49757]

It is not the designer's, company's agreement to this new style of design. All watch companies will have whacky ideas that might suit new tastes and this looks like they are going for the Cartier slice of the pie. But it to me looks more like a fancy Paneria

[@jsusna1972]

I can't imagine that someone at Patek got a pat on the back for this. Was this really 25 years in the making?

[@65hi863dhyu]

Highly dubious, I think this was done the night before it was due...

[@oysterman962]

It was actually designed by Louis Cartier for Santos Dumont

[@waynez5535]

They pulled a Balenciaga move: ugly uncreative and underwhelming, but the Chinese will eat it up like gold

[@MayonaiseSailor]

yes it was ... the dude collected the paycheck for 25 years, when he needed to deliver w photoshopped a nautilus into a square ... and voila ... 10 minute job to justify 25 years of salary

[@oysterman962]

@MayonaiseSailor Should be 25 years jail time for charging ridiculous prices for garbage designs.

[@FlaneurSolitaire]

"Have you ever been deeper than 30 m? If not, it's time to let it go!" - Are you kidding? I lost a watch I really liked that was 3 atm because I once wore it on a hike in summer, and it turns out I was sweating a bit too much and a bit of sweat got into the case and ruined the movement forever. A $45.000 "sporty" watch shouldn't be at risk of falling apart because your wrist gets sweaty. That said, it's nice to hear the opinion of the only watch KZbinr who has something nice to say about this thing.

[@v.t.3194]

Exactly. 30 m is not to be taken literally, it means you can risk to wash your hands without taking off the watch. 50m means „you can wash your hands a little longer“ and 100m is safe for ordinary swimming on the surface. 200 m is for real diving.

[@ailestriker9888]

@@v.t.3194so sweaty wrists shouldn’t have been an issue then?

[@v.t.3194]

@@ailestriker9888​​⁠no, sweaty wrists should not have damaged a 30m wr watch. Maybe your case was damaged or the case back was not properly screwed to the case, allowing moisture to reach the movement. In order to have a damaging impact it must have been a lot of sweat though that was able to get into the case.

[@manfriendlychurch]

30m is the static pressure of water at 30m, not depth you can take the watch. Movement of the wrist/watch increases the pressure so it will leak. I would assume a fault with the case of the watch is the reason the sweat got in.

[@philipturner8745]

Yeah. I remember years ago having to tell Christian Zeon this... come on Britt wake up.

[@cohenmd1]

"The design feels unfinished to me." "The Nautilus is congruent. It all flows into each other. The design feels cohesive." Very good, very sensitive observations. Good eye. There are a number of design rules being broken in this piece - based on the photos, as you noted.

[@hans-peterszameit3291]

You should know that 30 meters water resistance does not mean it can be submerged to 30 meters! 30m is 3atm, which is only resistant to minor splashing or rain. That comment really surprised me.

[@watchpapi]

You need to do a bit more research about what Patek says 30m means with regards to usage.

[@hans-peterszameit3291]

@@watchpapi what am I missing?

[@watchpapi]

@@hans-peterszameit3291 have a look on the website.

[@jamesblonde2271]

@@hans-peterszameit3291I means a "real world" 30 meteres, ie 10 m deeper than you will dive as an amateur, the old Naughtie was 150m & the construction hasn't changed. With 30m & a screw down crown you can dive with it. My first 6 dives were witha Seiko 5 & I still have it.

[@hans-peterszameit3291]

@@jamesblonde2271 Thanks for your insight. It's strange that Patek seems to have and use their own standards here when the usual and wider understanding of 30 meters in the watch world is 3atm. Looking at the comments, I certainly wasn't the only one to interpret it that way.

[@regsantotomas]

I think that I saw this watch in an episode of Star Trek. The Borg assimilated the Nautilus and deemed it “The Cubitus”.

[@johnmmxii]

Bump for underrated comment

[@flojomojo0]

This one looks like a Santos de Cartier on steroids to me.

[@BrittPearceWatches]

Bahaha literally!

[@EiferBrennan]

@@flojomojo0 that's what I love about it!

[@Josue0322]

The new Patek Santilus

[@Penny2105]

Not even close to Santos

[@drpepper3838]

The cartier actually looks good...

[@AndrewARR-f9h]

Hi Britt, You’re very good at being tactfully balanced. My view is the Cubitus looks like it could be the unwanted offspring of a Nautilus, Santos and Bell & Ross threesome but no one knows who the actual parents are. It’s visually repellent. ‘Next gen’ Patek owners have many other more interesting and better designed watches to choose from. This is a big miss. Also, re: water resistance. 30m is dress watch levels of resistance and doesn’t usually mean a depth rating. It means it is splash proof and no swimmable. That’s also a miss for young generation buyers I expect as it would be for most people wanting an integrated metal sports watch.

[@d23bw]

Always enjoy your analysis of all things timepiece. Not to have to endure the "me show" is a bonus. Thanks for your views and humour.

[@MFBMQ]

11:11 do you think the 30M WR means you can go diving up to 30m depth with it?

[@TheVuducha]

Yeah, I kinda expected more from you Britt

[@illiterate-ei8dp]

for omega it does

[@captainnothingness8825]

​@@TheVuduchaFor her to be more waterproof? 🤭

[@jimmykwok9131]

No, it means that you can wash your hand with it.

[@derosa1989]

@@jimmykwok9131 "To ensure the homogeneity and clarity of the information provided to clients, Patek Philippe has decided to introduce a new unified standard of water-resistance set at 30 meters for all watches certified as water-resistant - having been tested in air and underwater by immersion at an overpressure of 3 bars (corresponding to a depth of 30 m)," "This measure makes it possible to guarantee the same performance level across all the models concerned and to provide perfectly comprehensible information as to the day-to-day activities in which clients can engage while wearing their watch: washing their hands, showering, bathing, swimming, and other aquatic activities, including diving to a depth of 30m - which corresponds in large measure to actual utilization."

[@CristalRoederer]

Hey Britt, thanks for the video. Really nice as always. 1. PP had TWENTY FIVE YEARS to come and present something new and fresh "well, let's square the Nautilus" is not that fresh, right ? 2. It feels like they tried to lower all the costs to produce this new thing : same colour, same bracelet, same dots, same MOVEMENT 3. SAME MOVEMENT ??? For a one-in-25-years-watch, they re-use the same movement they have ? Do they have any R&D dpt ??! For real ? 4. I feel like I'm kind of "new & younger" customer they try to target but man, if I can spend 40k€ on this the only thing I want to do is to save a bit more and go for the 5164G... 5. Ultimately, PP doesn't care about the haters, as they stated, they are talked about and for many reasons all these 40k€ plus watches will be sold almost instantly and you can already find some crazy things on Chrono24, as always... FGS, come on PP..

[@CarsonLoewe]

Booooiiii Im glad I waited a whole 25 years for this Pubitus😊

[@JahangirRakib-x4u]

Perfect watch. All in one. It’s an informative video.

[@Jaywed]

Why would they keep the same Nautilus bracelet, which is rounded, with the angular case? Just pure laziness.

[@creedor]

Spot on!

[@sharktimewatch]

Britt, great video as always. I'm in the same boat as you are. Unlike most enthusiast I like what Patek is trying to do with this watch, and I don't hate the look. I also agree that I'm not the intended buyer for the watch. I'm being careful with the knee jerk reactions of watch community on this one as we could have what I like to refer to the Daytona effect. 10 years from now this could be the hottest watch on the market and all the nay sayers will talk about how they could not understand why it was not popular at launch time.

[@stevegaspar]

I glad many do not like it. I on the other hand love the look and the risk Patek is taking. This also means there is a potential shot for people like me to get one without having to wait years and years.

[@stickshifter8]

Risk? Like releasing a different shape version of an established successful product? This is possibly the least risky move one can think of…As of your chance of getting one from the AD, don’t hold your breath. This is immediately unobtainable, exactly as its older sibling. Only top tier Patek customers and well related flippers will be able to get them at MSRP prices.

[@stevegaspar]

@@stickshifter8 LMAO

[@liquid_metal]

I think I've just seen the 'lesser spotted idiot' in the wild... Calls itself Steve.

[@blakeg1528]

Great job! Spot on, on the plus's and minus's. I like them as well, and look forward to someday owning one!

[@ValleymanCan]

30m water resistant means "at least 30m away from water". The pressure in a shower is approx. 5 bar. Which means this watch can get damaged if you wear it while showering.

[@watchpapi]

Nope.

[@ValleymanCan]

@@watchpapi yep

[@watchpapi]

@@ValleymanCan 🤣🤣🤣 doubling down?? Ok.

[@ValleymanCan]

@@watchpapi no argument?

[@watchpapi]

@@ValleymanCan read the release from this years Watches and Wonders on the Patek website about what 30m means with respect to their watches, I don’t need to argue with you. You need to do a bit of research, I doubt you will but hey ho 🤷🏻 have a great Saturday evening ✌🏽♥️

[@m.e.p.r]

Absolutely love it! So much nicer than the now painfully boring 5711 ❤

[@FlyingNacho]

Looks like a Santos straight outta Temu.

[@BrittPearceWatches]

🤣🤣💕

[@maxine2798]

The stripes on the rotor match the sripes on the movement "frame/chassis". Thw earlier curved lines dont, somewhat obviously!

[@cyot1x92]

Looks like a kock-off from the Maen watch

[@carrerau7138]

What the hell is a Maen? Some American micro brand?

[@Mike-DuBose]

@@carrerau7138 It's a Dutch company. The name MAEN is an Old Dutch word meaning “Moon”.

[@chrisl7902]

@@carrerau7138I’d never heard of them either. It’s actually a nicer looking watch 😂.

[@CESONER]

To me, Patek has presented a clear concept. It’s right there in the name. So the straight finishing on the rotor is in the same design language. Though I prefer the circular finish too, just like you. Perhaps they tried it, and it looked out of place. I’ll give them the benefit of the doubt… Also, please never hate yourself. Even if you get a sunburn. ✌🏽

[@Burneraccountwisdom]

Patek's early work was a little too "new wave" for my taste. But when the Cubitus came out in '24, I think they really came into their own, commercially and artistically.

[@haidweng7948]

Lets see paul allen's patek

[@cedshred1676]

UptickWatchReviews did a hilarious voiceover roast of the Cubitus movie on the Patek website. Your review has been the most balanced and thoughtful of the ones I‘ve seen, so good job, as always.

[@jamesblonde2271]

hurts my eyes, its bloody awful, looks like someone asked AI to draw a Naughtie.......

[@BrittPearceWatches]

LOL - it is... a lot! Isn't it!

[@straightspoken1035]

Love, love, love the design. Looks like a mix of Patek’s mastery of movement and Cartier’s mastery of design. It’ll be a slow burner, considering some of the negative comments, but it’s a buy if you can afford it.

[@TYR117]

My real complaint is they didn’t put a square movement in it… otherwise I like it

[@mrbud8524]

Love it❤ Maybe watch community might pay more attention to Square case shape watches now after this new stunning Patek releases like Cartier , JLC, Heuer Monaco Calbrie 11 Steve McQueen

[@EiferBrennan]

This is a gorgeous watch. I definitely want the 5822P, but I'm a sucker for a Moonphase complication.

[@BrittPearceWatches]

RIGHT?! I am a sucker for asymmetrical goodness! Love the 5712 - so it's natural for me to love the 5822P - love that baguette diamond! Now I just need to find the money to fund it ;) ... also, I didn't say it in the video... But I truly HATE the 5822P clasp. Not sure how you feel about it!

[@EiferBrennan]

​​@@BrittPearceWatches I mean the clasp looks like a pain in the ass, which kind of is a downer, but if I could afford it it definitely wouldn't be a deal-breaker. Maybe one day.

[@andywylde]

Gotta be honest - I like the 5821/1AR. I still think the 5822P is an abomination.

[@blh940]

@@BrittPearceWatcheslike the fact that it’s a strap. Keeps the weight down- Stern talked about that being the reason they went that way.

[@GarethLeadbetter]

Good review - and on the money with your summary.

[@adamkajenski4890]

We are Cubitus of Borg!

[@bettersteps]

I dig it! Square (ish) watches are the next big thing. They really are! Maen and Bulova started the trend. It's catching on. You heard it here first. YOU will have a square (ish) watch on your wrist soon.

[@wesibrahimov7440]

Nautilus with sharp edges=shitty design

[@fayazmohamed959]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/iX7EqnSnZt6hjM0si=BavK0P8FkcrqbWC7

[@farhadfarajov8030]

Nice and objective preview with a pinch of humor as always expected from Britt.

[@BLANKSYBLANKSY]

Toyed with Genta design, looks like a high end Casio

[@bsodmike]

Sorry, but I'm calling it. I've owned a few PPs and currently my favourite is my 5170G (see my video). But, this is an elbow to the gut, at least for PP purists. They've clearly cheapened out on the rotor finishing and that kills it for me, even before we start to look at the "Cartier Santos", dressed up differently. Sure, it will be available at launch, hoarders will pre-order these in in the hope that in a few years this reaches Nautili status. Sure, go for it, but the finishing of the movement is paramount, and for this price point, they've cut corners. We can't expect Lange or FP Journe level finishing, but at least the general level of PP finishing as of 4 years ago shouldn't be cheapened. Thanks, Britt, your content is great - keep 'em coming. Best, Mike.

[@tobias1752]

If I‘d buy a square watch, I‘d opt for a Monaco..

[@BrittPearceWatches]

You know! There was a livestream where Thierry was talking about the Monaco being some of the inspo! He loves the Monaco but finds it a bit thick! So wanted to do a Patek square watch

[@modernworldiscrap]

1133B is gorgeous but fragile

[@NA-oo4ls]

@@BrittPearceWatchesThierry should have just bought a Tetra Neomatic and called it a day.

[@carrerau7138]

A good alternative for the middle class.

[@65hi863dhyu]

I'd rather have an Hermes H08. This is cheap, nasty design.

[@pmakor]

Maen is getting some free publicity through this launch. Saw the Manhattan but the Brooklyn looks great too.

[@russparkin6722]

the majority of young people dont have 30k to drop on watch with 30m of water resistance - i must move in the wrong circles clearly

[@oysterman962]

Clearly not for real watch enthusiasts. It's for the fashion crowd. The hype hunters

[@eduardwalhout1740]

They should have squared off the middle links in the bracelet a bit more aswell. To differ from the Nautilus and make it its own thing.

[@mosmarb]

It’s a story of multiple clashes for me. That rounded Nautilus handset with angular markers. The baseplates with proper CdG engraving and the cheap-looking bars on the micro rotor. None of the models quite gel imo.

[@shuabshungne8043]

What are the bulges on both case sides for? Compensational crown guard extension? A distress beacon, the Patek Philippe Emergency? Airbags? Maybe inside is a tool for a pill splitter when PD hits? Toothpick store?

[@watchpapi]

The design of the nautilus was based on a porthole, the bulge is a hinge, this design is derived from the nautilus (whether TS wants to admit it or not!).

[@Photoandcargeek]

Maen or Cartier ..... but not as nice. As much as I am used to the look of the Nautilus which I find surprisingly nice on the wrist (despite not owning one and not wanting one), this cubitus is just not as good looking as a Santos !

[@threefive2072]

super surprised the grand date is not at least an annual calendar !!

[@잡았다요놈-y9w]

It's hilarious how the internet hates on it but in reality it's going to be waitlisted to oblivion.

[@oysterman962]

Because people are sheep who need to follow trends. They have more money than style.

[@Mohika881]

We may not like these now but in 10 years time we’ll be drooling over them. Remember the journey the nautilus has had.

[@watchpapi]

Exactly. And the aquanaut.

[@DouglasRosser]

I actually like that design, but OMG what a chonky boi!

[@BrittPearceWatches]

🤣💕 I’m somewhere in between i think! I like it! Don’t love it. Don’t hate it

[@RicardoHawkes]

Great job Britt - amazing how a shape can really causing quite a stir!

[@RichMitch]

If the green dial setup was available in blue, it'd fly out the shop

[@BrittPearceWatches]

You know, I was thinking it’s a shame there isn’t a blue!

[@MrSaadmubarak]

They have to leave something for next year​@@BrittPearceWatches

[@yebzy]

Honestly makes me appreciate Genta that much more, seeing how he was able to make such a great design, and seeing how easy it was for them to screw it up, shout-out to the double G, he killed it.

[@irawolf]

Remember the successful JLC Reverso Squadra? Yeah…

[@abea8415]

Simply put: it looks like a microbrand. But the two tone one is amazing with the blue dial

[@PaulLikesPizza]

The Cartier Santos homage from Patek... the original man's wrist watch ever... Nice!

[@BrittPearceWatches]

Right?! It’s like the Patek interpretation of it

[@chief_energy5404]

The sports lines of AP, Rolex, Omega, and Cartier use a similar theme; VC are you watching?

[@suchethn7796]

I swear this is just a money grab. Patek knows people will buy anything with their name on it. I think this is objectively a bad watch for the money they are asking. Also 30m water resistance is unjustifiable because , you cant go 30m deep in water with 3atm or 30m resistance watch.

[@anthonyjordan5103]

@@suchethn7796 I agree. I think Patek are fresh out of ideas and originality.

[@DanielTorres-gy4qx]

Great job Brit. Very informative, Thank you

[@MayonaiseSailor]

Patek is now doing homage watches.... of the cartier santos... how the mighty have fallen... disapointing

[@jaybee1196]

Brittany, never stop never stopping!

[@EdwardHTilley]

It was designed by committee and it shows

[@abhaig]

This is a great balanced video. Andy, we have to remember, when nautilus first came out, they did not sell at all. They were being discounted. But the price point is not “entry-level”. These are expensive watches

[@Crypto_Circus]

So ugly, high end brands don’t evolve they just keep doing what works.

[@nielslarsen1693]

This definitely doesn't work

[@darellhunter2205]

Based on the pictures I think I will like the watch if I ever get to see one. I do agree, based on the wrist shots it may wear fairly large. My biggest gripe and I'm okay with it, I am not in Patek's target audience, but $40K USD for the stainless steel. Ouch... I'll keep saving and go after the rose gold Calatrava. Rolex it is for my sports models. Lol. They feel like such a bargain now. 😅 Thanks for the video Britt!

[@PeopleDoingRegardThings]

Dullard Thierry has been hanging around with too many trust fund babies I suspect. This is the perfect watch for 'rebels' who hate everything their parents built, just for the sake of being different. It's the perfect metaphor for that demographic as with the 'Cubitus' release, the infant Thierry will finally destroy everything the parent Genta created at Patek.

[@BrittPearceWatches]

🤣🤣 very strong thoughts!

[@patrik3450]

The two tone looks nice. But the steel watch looks not so exclusive

[@JasonAuerback]

I call it the Scamtos

[@StevenGSafran]

This thing is just hideous. An abomination. The emperor has no clothes. When it was first leaked everyone thought it was a hoax, a parody or a joke of some sort. The reality has sunk in that it's real and it's a spectacular fail. If you have to think in abstract terms to make something you are tasting seem palatable, it's not very tasty and it might be in fact be spoiled. Go with your first instinct and spit it out rather than thinking about it and swallowing. You may avoid getting sick that way. The Cubitus is a brick that looks awful in pictures and even worse on the wrist. It takes everything graceful and interesting about the Nautilus, reminding one of a ships porthole, and deconstructs it into a square with NO nautical reference and no design interest. I can't believe how ugly and stupid it is. Embarrassing really that they could release this crap and think that they can ride their reputation right through the criticism. That is the path to descent of a brand. No plane flies high enough to deny that there is ground below.

[@delocabi3038]

I like the all steel version. But look forward to the Pagani Design copy.

[@BrittPearceWatches]

🤣 won’t be long!

[@mell3109]

Kind of weird but after a few days I’m getting used to it 😂 however if you want to see how to balance a complex square dial then the Glashutte Original Seventies Chronograph panorama date is a masterclass

[@stickshifter8]

GO rocks, and it’s pano date mechanism is so elegant

[@Liam.geeraerts]

I actually love the cubitus look ❤ I understand people comparing it to the cartier santos and casio and I do see why but it’s definitely a favourite in my book

[@BrittPearceWatches]

Bahaha - Cubitus defenders UNITE!

[@LabofmusicRecords]

@@BrittPearceWatches Bond here... yup, muahaha, I'm in with the Cubanana 😎🤠😅

[@Greysprunkiyay]

PP could release a polished turd and you’d like it.

[@SuperTurboOne]

Can you imagine Thierry Stern's heart when Swatch came out with the What If series... a very bad day at the office!

[@DennisC_X]

First!!!!!

[@BrittPearceWatches]

Ahhh stop it right NOW, the early gang is here!

[@chadbailey7038]

I agree with your ending thoughts. It needed a bracelet more similar to the Royal Oak. And in my opinion, fit more like a vintage Royal Oak or Nautilus. 🤷🏾‍♂️. Still cool looking and exciting! Hopefully they will release smaller versions

[@dunderhay9169]

A safe design by committee ruined by the Nautilus wings and same again boring hands and dial. I'd take a Santos over this every time.

[@joshuatvernon]

Yeah honestly it would have just been a safe nice looking watch with a beautiful bracelet with the wings but with them the proportions don’t seem right 🤷‍♂️

[@toddmelnick4558]

Completely agree with your comment on the pricing. I think the 5205G is a far more beautiful piece versus the 5822P. I know it’s white gold versus platinum, but I’m not sure who would choose the 5822P over many other Pateks with a similar level of complications.

[@RelojesYRelojes]

Everything i need to know is that is sh*t.

[@BrittPearceWatches]

Bahaha! SO COLD! ;)

[@RelojesYRelojes]

@@BrittPearceWatches hahaha sorry! I need it to say it! But incredible vids britt i love them! Best story telling of all watchyoutubers

[@gregorynicolas1]

Makes way more sense than the Nautilus ever did. People tend to forget the hate both the Nautilus and the Aquanaut had back then. It's gorgeous

[@TheKillWizard]

I don't need a Patek anymore, this has turned me off the whole brand. Pukitus 🤮

[@BrittPearceWatches]

Oh gosh - I totally understand not being into it

[@watchpapi]

😂😂😂😂

[@benben2891]

Well about the grand date...actually Girard Perregaux has done it before. The Vintage 1945 Grand Date Moon Phase, and the 10-digit and single digit do not have any boundary or any "frame". So don't know why Patek keep boasting about its technology or expertise on the 5822P model...

[@guilhermecampagnaro1021]

Lazy design.

[@BrittPearceWatches]

It's all in the branding baaaabeh! It's not lazy, it's.... "Inspired" ;) haha

[@Islandchris242]

Thierry says he loves square watches, so he made one. Mic drop.

[@tps3057]

I love all 3 britt...another great video. Thanks

[@glenncaukill1320]

I like it , when people see what it’s worth second hand they will want one , obviously it will only go to the top Patek customers. Let’s face it the nautilus and aquanaut aren’t the best looking watches but still have ultra high demand. Patek certainly won’t worry about what is said on you tube about it . It will sell itself

[@ShanePleasance]

I like it! Will I be shifting my 5712? No.

[@john_vesli]

Best Old Money Watch ⌚❤

[@dani_a_biro]

Just got a glimpse at my wrist, wearing a Casio AE-1200, same case shape and bracelet for 40 euros.

[@MadalinaPollo]

It always amazes me how much beauty and precision are added to the parts of AMZWATCH's watch 99% of people will never see.

[@amazonproductreview4338]

Really wonderful!

[@nickdefreitas]

I get it’s not the most creative, but I do like the contrast of the two tone, I could see it being my first square watch.

[@danielgillrup9518]

I actually don’t hate it, I just think the extra bump outs on the sides make it too wide. I just looks..off to the me for that reason.

[@Islandchris242]

When the nautilus and royal oak were introduced people said the same thing, look at them now. A company like PP knows what they are doing and think/plan decades in advance. This lineup will be a huge hit