A Car-trastrophe

[@cccc-qp7ww]

These two deserve each other. I wish they both wouldn’t drive for the safety of the rest of us.

[@smileywelch8086]

I wish they were on judge Judy she would've dismissed the case period 😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@Olyanna537]

Wow! The insurance company determined these two people both acted badly, which I completely agree with. The plaintiff sped up when the defendant tried to merge. She admitted to being in a road rage incident and should have been responsible for her own costs. They both acted stupid

[@mauriciowilson42]

Insurance company wasn’t there to see it

[@mauriciowilson42]

This is why I love this judge , that man knew what he was doing and I’m glad the judge saw right through him

[@prayforthe_1644]

Did you just assume his gender?

[@aprilpinketon2567]

Wow! That’s ridiculous! She shouldn’t have gotten ANYTHING!!

[@jjman533]

Get a dashcam people!

[@loveyoutube2177]

Literally on Amazon ordering mine now. These people are crazy

[@lisavee4670]

Lol, Harvey almost called the litigants butt-holes at the end! 😂😅

[@rockobill7637]

that was hilarious 😅

[@perfectlyimperfect9129]

I feel like they are Both to blame acted like children

[@marleonetti7]

and the audience didnt seem to unanimously agree with her assumption that both parties were playing who is more macho . i personally believe it was the plaintiff who was the aggressor , she has ghetto ways and she was running a ghetto game with doug out in the hallway not answering the question did she learn anything . of course she didnt learn sh*t because she is ghetto minded .

[@Ace-of-cards2234]

She left the scene & wouldn’t get out bc she “ was scared “ but u we’re talking / cursing & keeping with him instead of telling him pass you

[@DoubleKim]

Right... This case was wild

[@missa1goins]

Plaintiff "I like blue, I'm a cool person" "I was afraid" sure you were. I don't believe the plaintiff. JM why ask if anybody got a ticket, then say the police can't give a ticket? Asking questions you already know the answer to.

[@zaraheart]

To be fair, there have been times where she’s asked for something like she would say “ah you probably don’t have that” but then the litigant is like “Oh yes I do” and then JM is shocked lol I think she HAS to ask. Not just for TV and so people have all the information but to cover all her bases as well. I mean I’m pretty sure she already has the police report and has already looked at it. Everything they placed into evidence she has already.

[@kellykern4771]

I don’t agree with the judge ruling. Bad call

[@glenncurley680]

Why? Okay, here's why. In Canada if you change lanes and get hit it is always the person changing lanes that is at fault.

[@ruthcalfee7868]

@@glenncurley680But in America, if you rear end someone, you are at fault 99% of the time, regardless of a lane change!!!

[@glenncurley680]

@@ruthcalfee7868 She didn't rear end him. The collision was a the back wheel of the drivers side.Did you even watch the video?

[@ruthcalfee7868]

@ Sorry, I misspoke, but crap happens sometimes! Regardless, if one is hit on the side of the vehicle between the rear door post (approximately the center point of the vehicle) or further back, the accident is the other person’s fault because they have full view of it. I knew an accident recreationist, and that’s how he explained it to me. Have a great day!

[@GigiRulesTheRoost]

She's a liar....she didn't just shrug like "what's up". She was yelling and cussing and chasing him.

[@marleonetti7]

and also , i dont like how she responded to doug at the end when he asked her if she learned anything , she immediately changed the subject on him and would not even entertain in any way answering that simple question because her unwillingness and stubbornness to admit that she had any part in the incident was obvious . now i know she started the whole damn thing and she should not have received a penny from the judge .

[@GigiRulesTheRoost]

@@marleonetti7 She thinks she is charming and smart. She is extremely cagey and insufferable. I think if she had not been a woman, the judge may have been more fair. JM went after the male defendant like a badger. Poor guy.

[@missa1goins]

@GigiRulesTheRoost, and the defendant couldn't get a full sentence out of his mouth, JM cut the man off every time he open his mouth. He admitted he was road raging, the plaintiff acting she's so calm.

[@davidwhite3180]

Oh yeah you k know you were right there.

[@thefonzkiss]

I’ve watched hundreds of these and I’ve never seen her directly address the audience like that before.

[@Re-ek2vq]

She’s done it a few times tbh.

[@davidwhite3180]

I have many times

[@navydoc6889]

I'm confused... the damage done to the Plaintiff's car (through pictures) was on the driver side of the vehicle and front bumper however, during her testimony, on the white board, she positioned his vehicle as hitting her passenger side fender/bumper???? Did I see that correctly?

[@davidwhite3180]

You did!

[@shurdell5014]

Unless the pics were taken inverted, the damage is on the drivers side, making it impossible for the accident to have happened the way the plaintiff said.

[@Mimi197-f2z]

BOTH ARE PSYCO DRIVERS! Neither should be on the road period!!!!

[@pineyforkpress]

I know that intersection well, it is dangerous and easy to cause an issue. The end of the Northern State. Big hill and the LIE.

[@Begotts]

This was more about the judge and what she would do in a situation like this, Then it was about the defendant or plaintiff. We had to listen to her and how she acts in society more than what these two actually did…get off your high horse every now and then JM.

[@larrybrown3951]

She is a road rage liar.

[@aprilpinketon2567]

Big liar!

[@missa1goins]

I agree!

[@cplagrl71]

Both

[@stephenbivin1968]

I think she got this one wrong. the plaintiffs personality screams aggressor

[@davidwhite3180]

You must be a psychiatrist. You know her really good in less than 30 minutes

[@zaraheart]

@@davidwhite3180You just did the same thing to them though 😂😂

[@Charlene-fi1sr]

I don't understand how Judge M came to the decision that the defendant was deliberately trying to torment the plaintiff. Unless something important was edited out, it seems they both acted impulsively and immaturely in that situation. And I don't agree with the verdict.

[@sunshine092710]

I agree

[@aprilpinketon2567]

I second that!

[@watcher9987]

You must have watched a different video. He was being an asshole

[@NORTAH85]

Bias from the get go

[@marleonetti7]

i can tell just by my own life experience of over 50 years observing different types of people that the plaintiff was the problem and she lives her life by the rules of the ghetto , but the defendant on the other hand was raised well and does not live his life by those ghetto ways but even the most well raised people will eventually respond in kind to ghetto people who mess with them on the wrong day.

[@lanaspencer9893]

Love her glittery jacket 😂

[@aprilpinketon2567]

Bc, she lied about her actions and “only shrugging” I don’t believe a word out of her mouth! I believe the man went on about his business and she continued her craziness!

[@davidwhite3180]

I’m sure you also believe in Santa and the reindeer

[@evolutionofcando379]

wow the judge didn’t like that guy, it was 50/50

[@mauriciowilson42]

lol 🎉she won don’t be mad

[@jamikaparks468]

The Defendant acting confused, "I'm confused, I don't know why she was mad... I'm not sure what happened." 🙄

[@nunya8010]

The judge was right,she's an old woman that would never get into road rage,it's all his fault and she doesn't need to learn a lesson, she should have been given 5,000 for how much he scared her...judge millian is so smart and doesn't talk about herself during the entire episode because it's not about her and she's completely not biased either😂

[@TU-qc5xr]

The judge got it right. It's the positioning of the car in the evidence that tips the scale in her favor andhe admitted pulling out in front of her in an illegal move after saying he didnt

[@adriannashaw7523]

As an Aussie I completely forget people can just pull out a piece at any time over there

[@lisavee4670]

I thought that was Colin Powell in the thumbnail🤷

[@robenrox]

Haha hilarious! 😂

[@lukerinderknecht2982]

RIP

[@livefastdieyoung20]

He admitted he cut her off first and caused her to be upset. Then got back in her lane after she switched. Which makes him more likely to be the aggressor again. I agree with the Judge .

[@justhere4721]

Judge was wrong. The reason she gave the defendant for not being able to sue should also be the same reason the plaintiff shouldn't either.

[@mauriciowilson42]

The judge never wrong , the man was a liar and she saw it

[@bluebutterfly244]

"yelling and cussing at him for some reason" Hell, man I'd cuss at him, too. Smug weasel. But she's out to lunch so they should get married.

[@devianadkar7969]

The plaintiff drove into his vehcile. The damages suggest that. Jm obviously went for the weak old lady crap.

[@tsukie11]

Judge M is usually strictly by the book but here she awarded the plaintiff over $1000?! That is ridiculous. I think the police and the insurance companies were correct that it was both their faults. She doesn’t look like a blushing little girl. She looks like she would stand up for herself through bad language and anger! She wasn’t backing down just like he wasn’t backing down. They should have both gotten zero and then Judge Millian could have given one of her famous speeches that this should teach them to not have road rage in the future.

[@Ryan-pm4fk]

The plaintiff is a real hot head, her demeanour says it all, to an extent the defendant is also to blame for acting stupidly.

[@daywantiesingh8486]

These people create their own problems and then ask someone else to fix their mess!

[@matthew-w8v]

The POS judge was wrong on this one.

[@andrewanderson-np7wz]

I totally disagree with this ruling. It was allready settled by the insurances at 50/50. So I don't get how the plaintiff doesn't have to abide by the settkement. They were both at fault. He came back into her lane and she sped up seeing him coming back over. Neither side should have gotten anything.

[@marychavarin1982]

Milian is such a sexist - I had a women studies professor like that.... feel for her husband - whom also looks scared to talk around her 🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@babsdolson]

go to the nearest police station

[@highlander666]

She seems very unpleasant & ridiculous, probably drives 10mph under the speed limit 😅

[@the24storepodcast]

I wonder why everyone disagrees with the judge 🤔🤫🤔🤫🤔🤫

[@babsdolson]

not worth it

[@kellyerumph8592]

Regardless of both their behavior, the verdict is correct. He had the responsibility of making sure the coast was clear for him to get over in the lane she was already in. As far as the insurance, they will always find away to minimize their responsibility.

[@kimberlyadorno280]

Finally, someone intelligent🙌! I'm reading these comments like🥴They both behaved poorly. However, the burden fell on him to have been completely positive he had enough room to merge safely into the lane.

[@malkiyarochelle2633]

You can look at his face and tell he did that on purpose

[@Smaquis]

Her face

[@imartinist]

@Smaquis His face

[@LoveNicolette.]

This was prob a road rage issue but the plaintiff seems like an everyday miserable person.

[@zaraheart]

Bleh. This is why dash cams should be a mandatory item in every vehicle. It probably won’t be though, sadly, because that greedy country won’t make money from people like the not-very-smart litigants in this episode.

[@amylouwho8991]

I think the judge should have left them like she found them and dismissed both cases. I absolutely think it was a case of quién más macho.

[@Majesticstylezz]

Doug said, "nice to see you here too" 😂😂

[@shelberz1]

How do litigants research the judge before they go on national television?

[@shelberz1]

Ohhh hmph so plaintiff had clearly seen the show before yet still participated in road rage that’s bizarre

[@jerrystamatinos3241]

i don't agree with the judge

[@janicemontique9876]

She's emotionally and mentally damaged. She needs to see a psychiatrist ASAP. So sad

[@ElsaFriost]

I think she is lying just like the other lady she is lying she's making it up as he goes along

[@MaxDalessio]

This is a perfect case that you can be s complete moron and still legally allowed to drive

[@SongBird21-nz8vx]

Ms. Blingy is all looney and the defendant is sort of looney.

[@peezypeeze9140]

I think a lot of people here just think they know EVERYTHING! Both of these people are complete buttholes. Yes, she is playing the “frail ole innocent lady” act however HE admits he cut her off TWICE. The insurance companies may not pay out the settlements, but they are not the law. The police do not handle civil disputes. Judge Milian was an actual judge who passed the bar exam and practiced law. Most of us aren’t. I think we need to remember that. You can disagree all you want, but to say that she ruled wrongly (in a mediation that is fashioned like a court room), is wild.

[@ChristineDuval-cy5ck]

Let the looney's go by. She is a looney. She should have lost.

[@mauriciowilson42]

lol she won 🎉

[@BinaBina221]

I have been on the road with men like him and they do continue to harass you after the initial interaction. Misogyny on the road! She was a mess too tho BUT not as bad as him. 60/40 was ok. 70/30 would have been fair!

[@kimberlyadorno280]

Those who are confused don't seem to realize being a jerk on the road doesn't typically cost money until your a**hole tactics actually cause damage. Yes, it's more likely than not they were BOTH engaged in the wreckless stupidity of pissing each other off. However, the defendant's maneuver cutting into the plaintiff's lane actually caused the accident/impact. For that reason, he was found to be more at fault by JM. The defendant should be glad both insurance companies deemed him only 50% at fault because fault 51% or higher would result in a surcharge/points on his license(at least that's the case in MA).

[@12Daze]

2:43 bro is animated

[@palopinto4065]

JM makes up her own stories without proof. I didn't think a judge could find you guilty based upon her own assumptions.

[@HeatherWho11.10]

That's literally how civil court works. They judge the situation based on the information they're given.

[@palopinto4065]

@HeatherWho11.10 she judging on info no one has given her.

[@MagnolyiaGrace]

Both of them agree the "judge" will arbitrate, make a decision, and it's binding. While this show isn't scripted or fake like some of the others, it's still entertainment and the "judge" can decide anyway they want. Public civil courts may have different rules, but this is TV, not the same and both parties agreed to it giving up their ability to sue in a public civil court.

[@palopinto4065]

@MagnolyiaGrace I understand all that but it would be terrible to be told you're a liar when your not in from of millions of people but that's what you get when you air your dirty laundry in public.

[@palopinto4065]

@HeatherWho11.10 Yes on the information "they get," not assume. Oh well, who cares. The show is entertaining.

[@bongoikno4994]

She a whole lie 😂😂

[@mauriciowilson42]

lol she won 🎉

[@Jamericancutie2024]

😂😂 the judge does let nobody speak she just blah blah, blah, blah blah blah bla

[@harpert579]

Plaintiff acting all classy in court. She's not so classy in real life apparently.

[@crystalshaw8744]

They went down a road I like to call violence road.

[@AlienLeadership]

AVP 👽 .... I think behind /...but /. It's a lot every morning / yep /

[@crazybeatlefan]

crap.....nice 2 and half minute ad....total crap..i am out.,

[@milesdyson5211]

He looks like a Jerk to start road rage things

[@wilmamalone1256]

Can't Stand his racist smirk😮

[@Kat-bu3bn]

🤣

[@paulmarsh5856]

This screaming Judge should be removed !!!

[@HeatherWho11.10]

It's a television show for entertainment 🙄

[@Kat-bu3bn]

Don’t watch it then.

[@Mimi197-f2z]

remove yourself...shes ben here for 25 years!!!!!!

[@paulmarsh5856]

@@Mimi197-f2z Go back to school and learn to spell and punctuate a sentence - BEFORE you post a comment !!!

[@red_icee962]

Yeah then you would have nothing to b!+ch about.

[@RamonMartinez-mp1qb]

WOOOOO HOOOO!!!! THE PLAINTIFF WON!!!!!!!!!!!!

[@Kat-bu3bn]

🤣

[@nelsonbarbosa3226]

Last i heard when you hit a car from behind and your front is damaged you did not maintain control of your vehicle, therefore she shouldn't get anything as she hit the defendant from behind, this is another case of Judge M being biased and looking out for the litigant with a Hispanic last name