Going Airborne | The People's Court

The plaintiff alleges the defendant crashed her car into hers, so the plaintiff is suing for damages. The defendant argues the plaintiff is the one who hit her vehicle.
Subscribe to our channel:
/ @peoplescourttv
Case # 22-005
#PeoplesCourt #RealityTV #Court

[@92yannaboo]

We don’t care how old the cases are, please keep uploading them!!! 👏🏽👏🏽

[@mitulu74]

Somebody is listening to our cry !!! 😮 cause I am impressed and entertained!! 😂

[@nikinice8571]

Strongly agree

[@jeremySJThompson]

1000000000% agree!!!

[@anthonykorn]

I want the cases from the 80's

[@mitulu74]

@anthonykorn 🤣 that's a diff judge tho I wonder how funny those r? I think that's judge wapner...

[@Nevaeh1]

I hope they found the person that caused the accident and got their money

[@ShugaAnnSpyce]

If they didn't, karma will get that person.

[@Julie-sl8ul]

Thank goodness everyone is alive 🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽

[@charismamartin1545]

Yes thank God

[@sherryt2479]

Amen 🙏🏾

[@adlifting9824]

What a traumatic experience! Unfortunately the real criminal is still out there. But still the defendant should have had insurance.

[@ZoePoupe]

They got this out the vault! Thank you! 😊

[@chef1088]

No more “new” episodes to upload. Soo happy they are uploading older ones.

[@mitulu74]

Yasssss 🙏

[@leesal9753]

😢 wow both parties are lucky to be ok. This is crazy

[@markbirchette8740]

No insurance, you shouldn't have had your car on the road.

[@sheltiemomstefanie2564]

Exactly !!

[@davidperez5089]

End of story. No case. ​@@sheltiemomstefanie2564

[@adventuresconjuan]

I mean, technically having no insurance doesn’t mean you’re not capable of driving specially if you have a valid driver license

[@markbirchette8740]

@adventuresconjuan As long as the vehicle your driving has insurance, nothing technical about it.

[@user-jb1tw3qi6d]

Most unoriginal comment..thanks granny

[@tiktokvibes8767]

it was such a miracle that they survived. i so agree with JM’s advice to both parties at the end. God is truly so Good🤍🤍

[@brittneyreigns]

When people HIT AND RUN! They don’t have INSURANCE or NO LICENSE!

[@kimberlyadorno280]

Or under the influence. Whatever the case, I hope Karma finds them.

[@toni3901]

Amen, Judge Milan words. Thank you, God, for 1 more day

[@Cookie-8-c8s]

I actually disagree with this verdict. If your vehicle doesn't have insurance, your car should not be on the road. Legally had she followed the law. She wouldn't have been on the road, but for her completely violating the The law. She wouldn't have been there then and one event. Propelled onto the other woman's vehicle judge, Judy would have definitely given the plaintiffs. What they were asking

[@juliacurry3367]

totally disagree

[@MsBenitaButrell]

Exactly! It doesn't matter who caused the accident, if your car makes contact with another, causing damage, you are in fact at fault! I've worked in LE for years, we see it all the time. In pile up accidents on the highway, the car that hit you is at fault for your vehicle damage (for following too closely) not the car 6 cars back. JM knows the law but her biases cloud her judgement.

[@kimberlyadorno280]

I can understand why the plaintiffs believed they had a right to sue the defendant, especially considering she had no insurance...but why in the world would the defendant think she could recover damages from the plaintiffs? They're all so lucky to have walked away from that disaster without any major injuries...or worse. I truly hope they were able to figure out who the other driver was. If not, I hope that person has received their deserved karma!

[@iamdenislara]

<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="597">9:57</a> when people comment on the internet “insurance is a scam” LOL I want to send them this section.

[@Fribee83]

I mean, it can be useful but still be a scam. If you've never made a claim in a decade and while you're at a stoplight, a driven can slam into you through zero fault of your own and your rates will increase. My partner used to be an assistant at an insurance place and someone broke into my truck, told me to just pay outta pocket to have it fixed than go through insurance because they'd see my house as a dangerous area, increasing the likelihood of it happening again, and my rates would go up by $30-50/month for years; that whatever I'd save on the repair would be paid out 10-fold over the years. Sure enough, coworker had it happen, went through insurance and it increased their rates by $38/month.

[@iamdenislara]

@@Fribee83 🤦‍♂️ … you didn’t buy insurance for a decade term, you bought for the 6 months period. Now, the fact that you own a car for a decade and wanted to insurance the car is not a scam. You got what you paid for: an insured asset.

[@Fribee83]

@@iamdenislara Cool, can you pooint out where I said I bought it for a decade term? When someone says "I've have house insurance since 1980", do you think they bought a 44-year term? Are you pretending to be this dense to be feign being right or is this your natural state?

[@iamdenislara]

@@Fribee83 yes honey, I am the dense one. 👍

[@Fribee83]

@@iamdenislara At least you have the self-awareness to admit it. Now you can move forward and grow.

[@melodiejohnston9528]

What a fustercluck! It would be delicious to find the sad example of a person that created this disaster. Both parties are very fortunate. Best wishes to all.

[@MsBenitaButrell]

It doesn't matter who caused the accident, if your car makes contact with another, causing damage, you are in fact at fault! I've worked in LE for years, we see it all the time. In pile up accidents on the highway, the car that hit you is at fault for your vehicle damage (for following too closely) not the car 6 cars back. JM knows the law but her biases cloud her judgement.

[@arianefr78]

WHAT? I don't understand, because in the case of a pile-up, each car is responsible for the damage done to the car in front. So in this case, the guy who left the scene is responsible for the defendant's damage, and the defendant is responsible for the plaintiff's damage, so why did the plaintiff get nothing? This is no different. But one major point, the defendant had NO INSURANCE so shouldn't have even been on the road and if she hadn't been on the road, the accident would never have taken place, BUT if she had insurance, the plaintiff wouldn't be out of pocket...

[@honestyisadyingvirtue]

In the case of cars hitting each other from behind, that's because fault can be laid at the person for following to close or not having enough space for the car in front of them. She wasn't near the plaintiff, and this was not caused by her initially, at all, regardless of insurance. Sure, her not having insurance should have garnered her a ticket, but to be civilly liable for an accident you did not cause, I'm not so sure.

[@MsBenitaButrell]

BINGO! You're the only knowledgable person in these comments.

[@ainnochaim9450]

In my hometown, a local politician proposed that we do a small gas tax that would essentially give all drivers insurance. I love this idea. Guess who spent an ungodly amount of money to stop that bill from passing? Hint: it was NOT the People.

[@Derriayers]

I don't even like paying for my insurance, why should I help pay for someone else's?

[@ainnochaim9450]

@@Derriayers Do you understand that your high premiums are blamed on uninsured drivers?

[@edwardj.7007]

Silly case. As soon as she described the accident I immediately knew that she was suing the wrong person.

[@blynn2505]

Right lol wrong person clearly

[@antoinettetapper2785]

Best advice judge. Thank you, Lord, for keeping them safe

[@G-PAT]

All of them should have been on their knees thanking God that they are still alive because you know that was a miracle that they survived that😮😮😮😮😮😮 I hope they found that person that hit her 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾

[@Amanda-mb7zt]

She should have had insurance but as a claims adjuster, they 100% would not have accepted fault and paid out to the plaintiff. It would only have covered her own car.

[@naderthescammerabusesdd9284]

NEWS FLASH YOU HIT THEM!!!! They didn’t hit you! The audacity of the lady to sue them for the damages when she had no insurance and hit them

[@kellyann5587]

She was hit also. She didn't cause the accident

[@jennifer_mertens]

In the first 30 seconds, the Plaintiff proved the Defendant was also a victim and not negligent in the accident. They need to find the idiot that hit the Defendant's car. I was all ready to be against the Defendant, but she clearly was also victimized by the first driver's negligence(although she should have had insurance). I was a little irritated how the Judge got so "excited" hearing the details of this clearly traumatic crash. It was a bit over the top.

[@jlf7362]

And the defendant needs to go sue the driver who caused the accident, not the plaintiff

[@mahailiabrown3972]

​@@jlf7362Wow. They both Sue that other person. Because if it wasn't for the other person to hit the defendant and the plaintiff whenever I got her car in an accident so they were doubling him in a Sue. Then it would bring their case stronger. Because technically, she is like an eyewitness in a way of her car getting clipped. I'm flying up and then hitting her which damage her car

[@msfranklin2650]

SHE'S NO DAMN VICTIM SHE SHOULDN'T HAVE BEEN ON THE RD IN THE 1ST PLACE

[@MrsTrafford]

So, if someone hits someone who then hits another car, the second car pays for the third, then their insurance has to go after the first car’s insurance. It sucks, but it’s true.

[@redapol5678]

That depends on the situation. Usually that is the case because the cars are not spaced far enough apart for a “safe distance”, so technically each car is at fault. In the case presented, the only one at fault is the first car who fled the scene. Neither the plaintiff nor the defendant did anything to cause the accident

[@Jahmai203]

The Plaintiffs don't have to have collision insurance! It's only required if the car is not paid for. The Defendant was driving with NO INSURANCE and received no penalty. I wonder why.

[@ericablige9449]

Things that make you go hmmm🤔

[@hadley407]

Did she say she didn’t get a ticket? If she did, I missed it.

[@Jahmai203]

@@hadley407 in a serious accident like this, where lives could have been lost, I could see a police officer turning a blind eye, but she still should have had to pay the Plaintiffs. They were on the road legally and were minding their business!

[@LIVEINPEACE2023]

@@Jahmai203I agree!

[@renmi24]

neither side got judgments, but i am curious...if the defendant had insurance, would her insurance company have even paid the plaintiff since she wasn't at fault? defendant is definitely stupid for trying to counter-sue, though.

[@madmaxofspokane1691]

The criminal that caused this whole chain reaction is out there, and people know who he is. I can't imagine having a newer vehicle and only having limited liability.

[@oldageisdumb]

We have a couple older vehicles (for the kids) that we have only liability but that’s because we are able to absorb the cost of the vehicle if the worst happens. It’s worth it to us to save money on insurance that way. But if you can’t afford to absorb the cost you must have full coverage.

[@mariehampton740]

​@@oldageisdumb you pegged it!!! Hit the nail on the head! ❤

[@JamieM470]

@@oldageisdumb That's exactly me :) I have a 1998 vehicle I paid $1500 for about 7 yrs ago, and I've only ever had liability on it. Recently bought a newer car that would cost a lot more money to fix or replace (I wouldn't be able to afford it, like you said), so this one has full coverage.

[@coveredcovered20]

​@@oldageisdumbALWAYS HAVE FULL COVERAGE

[@oldageisdumb]

@@coveredcovered20 Why? If the car isn’t worth a lot, why is it necessary?

[@itscollysworld1389]

Hold up hold up hold up… You are not REQUIRED to have collision.. And the other party didnt even have insurance.. but you naggin at the onw who had insurance?really judge?????

[@honestyisadyingvirtue]

Sure but now look at them, hurting for that choice. This could've easily had been an accident they caused and they couldn't the choice they made. She's simply letting them know that ALL choices have consequences and a freak accident happened, and this was their consequence.

[@jennzifur]

Actually, if you have a leased vehicle, you HAVE to have full coverage.

[@christalb8213]

KEEP THE OLD CASES COMING!!

[@josefagyeman135]

Christai, which city do u live?

[@TheQueenrevolution]

Moral of the story... have full coverage...and don't let it lapse. I'm so glad they all were OK. It's a blessing.

[@AspiireK]

Don't agree with the verdict! In multi car accidents "car A" can sue "car B" for damages caused and "car B" must then seek compensation from "car C"

[@ElLiSe..]

Then you should not drive, the first car that hit her cause the train reaction. So they have to find that driver

[@amberthomas3939]

That's what I always thought🤔

[@Lady_Love143]

What did she do wrong for her to owe you for your injuries. She did nothing wrong.

[@MrAllan9]

She was driving illegally with no insurance, she is at fault.

[@AshleyReeves-kg3fp]

⁠@@MrAllan9 that’s not how that works. She would be liable criminally, a traffic ticket, but not liable for the accident if she is in fact not at fault. Insurance is civil. Traffic laws like having insurance are criminal. Wish more people understood it all but I honestly didn’t either until I worked for auto insurance for a decade.

[@emilyshaffer7291]

But shouldn’t defendant have to chase the third guy rather than the plaintiff?

[@jennifernordhoff6478]

Completely ridiculous The missing guy is who they need to sue. Waste of time.

[@StraightEdgeHeathen]

exactly

[@wdwnutjm]

Judge Milian often says "The cheap comes out expensive" - in this case, I feel like that applies to everyone's insurance

[@howardhudson9592]

Love the old cases too!

[@Sook995]

That’s why is better to have your car insurance or life insurance on auto payments that way it won’t lasp

[@sheltiemomstefanie2564]

Sometimes you are robbing Peter to pay Paul. Kinda hard

[@Grovel007]

@@sheltiemomstefanie2564what Peter do to you?

[@runningawayvagabond5876]

@@sheltiemomstefanie2564 If after robbing Peter you don't have enough left over to pay Paul, get your car off the road. Sure thing, life can be hard, but I shouldn't have to eat it because you broke the law.

[@sheltiemomstefanie2564]

@@runningawayvagabond5876 hey I’m talking about the auto pay Lol. I don’t put my insurance on autopay. Some people don’t have it like that.

[@sheltiemomstefanie2564]

@@Grovel007 you don’t know I ain’t telling you. 😜

[@rodnashastewart3090]

Even if she had insurance they would be paid the plaintiffs because it wasn’t the defendants fault

[@dcbabe0270]

Takes a pretty crappy individual to cause what could have been a fatal crash and take off. I hope they found him and sued!

[@yahdygirl]

judge you are wrong if she the defendant had killed her driving without insurance she would have been charged with manslaughter.

[@Estiallina]

I like court because it has parties and recess. It should be a lot more fun than it actually is.

[@sula0020]

What a nightmare 😮

[@amberkumar4514]

It’s illegal not to have insurance. Thankfully there was a witness but I really hope JM would care whether someone had insurance if one of them had been at fault.

[@VANITYISFARE]

This happened to me . I was in stop and go traffic and truck hit me going 65 mph. My car flew up and then slammed back down on the car in front of me . The driver that hit me had to pay for both of our cars

[@coveredcovered20]

IT PAYS TO HAVE FULL COVERAGE

[@vvoodlands22]

please upload the episode where the laundromat puts the wig in the washing machine 🙏🏻 it was the first episode of The People’s Court that I ever saw

[@wrightwilliams105]

What a horrific accident. They were both lucky to walk away. She should have had insurance, but that has nothing to do with fault.

[@Derriayers]

How far were they all going, jeez??!

[@devisissy1]

I'm at fault state. Defendant would have had to pay because she has no insurance so she's automatically at fault.

[@AshleyReeves-kg3fp]

Absolutely not true. At fault does not means at fault for the accident it’s self, which she was not. Neither at fault nor not at fault states (which are only in regards to medical and injury claims) can pursue a not at fault party like the defendant for a criminal charge like not having insurance that’s between the criminal courts to cite her but nothing to do with insurance company automatically having to pay out for an accident she was not responsible for.

[@AshleyReeves-kg3fp]

Read your policies people

[@KennuhWayne]

​@@AshleyReeves-kg3fp😂😂😅

[@crystalshaw8744]

The Defendant was doing some Dukes Of Hazzard ish. I hope no one was seriously injured...smh

[@annereidy7981]

They're both alive, both winners!

[@porschehamilton7594]

This is so triggering for me. I hydroplaned and landed in a ditch upside down. I felt like i was in the air FOREVER i had time to keep repeating “oh im abt to die, im about to die, prepare yourself youre abt to go” “i even had time to think like oh this is what i see on tv. This is really happening “ that was back in 2016 and i still get emotional when i talk abt it.

[@Purplegirl-pi1jo]

Wow, I’m so glad you survived ❤

[@porschehamilton7594]

@@Purplegirl-pi1jo thank you 🙏🏽

[@Mitch-Alex]

I was involved in a horrible hit and run in 2014 and All State dropped me bc they said iiiii was too much of a liability

[@Mocharocks9966]

Defendant should’ve had insurance

[@amandabrown6565]

Here in the state I live, we're a no fault state and the defendant would of had to pay. She got really lucky by NOT having to pay. I say that because she shouldn't have been on the road at all because she wasn't insured. So if she would have been home and not driving that car the accident wouldn't have happened. Another thing I didn't like was Judge M saying if the plaintiff had full coverage she would have been able to get her car fixed. The plaintiff was the one that had insurance and it shouldn't of mattered what coverage she had even if it was just liability. I didn't like that at all and that wasn't fair to say.

[@686JM]

@amandabrown6565 Judge Milian applied the law in the respective state where the accident took place. The plaintiff would need to go after whomever caused the defendant's car to go flying into hers. This WASN'T a rear-end crash or any type of accident where the defendant "caused it" by not having insurance. 🙄 People in these comments really need to pay attention to what the judge says.

[@starchild3600]

I was rear ended by someone who had insurance and they did not pay ANYTHING.

[@slmel7]

If you don't have insurance, you should automatically be the one 100% liable bc you shouldn't have been on the road in the first place.

[@angelicachanel2774]

Yea but it would not be fair if the person didn't cause the accident because in this case the Plaintiff even say that defendant got hit by someone

[@JloveLamar]

​@@angelicachanel2774 There would be no accident if your car wasn't on the road. It shouldn't be if it isn't insured.

[@redapol5678]

Except that’s not the law. Run for office or petition to change the law. But good luck with that 😉

[@ebonysmith888]

One party got the message.. the other didn’t. Very unfortunate

[@kingoffarts8352]

Wow the defendant was driving illegally and got away with it.

[@redapol5678]

How do you know whether she received a ticket or not? It’s a matter for the police and traffic authorities to deal with if she doesn’t have insurance. Doesn’t make her automatically responsible for someone else causing an accident 🤦‍♂️

[@KrisLim-kz6zh]

What happened to you can sue somebody jointly or severly they just pick and choose when to apply the law

[@SarahParker-bo9uz]

I believe you can choose to sue people jointly or severally only if both of the offending parties were actually at fault. Which, in this case the defendant was not at fault. So that does not apply.

[@KrisLim-kz6zh]

@@SarahParker-bo9uz she is at fault. Her car hit his.

[@AlanDanielJackson]

​@@KrisLim-kz6zhhis car hit her

[@dermainedibbins9157]

​@@KrisLim-kz6zhSo you're at a red light stopped behind another car and someone hit you causing you to hit the vehicle in front of you. You hit the car in front of you but how are you at fault?????

[@elvickRULES]

@@KrisLim-kz6zhif someone pushed you and you stumble into another person you are not at all responsible for the injuries caused by your assailant. You’re both victims of that initial push. That person alone is responsible. This woman had nothing to do with it unless you can prove she’s lying about being hit.

[@cocoagreen1207]

Wow talk about a Real God saving them both. BUT. this is exactly why I keep my Full Coverage

[@tashiaoghenemine3795]

Even if she had insurance they wouldn’t have paid because the accident was cause by the third car.

[@johnsradios484]

Man oh man people running around without insurance or under insuranced

[@barbaraness4507]

If you can’t afford insurance you shouldn’t drive!

[@kid8563]

I was once told by a judge that anyone can sue in a multi car accident. He told me it doesn't matter who was at fault. Maybe different states have different laws.

[@Catloudan]

You can sue but you wouldn’t win lol.

[@bradconrad936]

You can sue anybody for any reason at anytime... doesn't mean you'll win.

[@amyanndiamond13]

Once it's established that you have no insurance you should automatically lose if you file a lawsuit. No matter who's fault it was, you shouldn't have been on the road & it never would have happened if you weren't.

[@dermainedibbins9157]

Even if she had insurance her insurance company would have denied the plaintiff's claim for the very same reason the judge denied her claim lol

[@adeanelson3201]

There are punishments for driving without insurance, your idea wouldn't be realistic

[@angelicachanel2774]

Your last statement is dumb because it would of still happened insurance or not.

[@kellyann5587]

Why is everyone attacking her?? She was hit..

[@trulyme3234]

Love ❤ Her❤🎉

[@moniquej4778]

They were both so sweet. How scary that was

[@patticake7297]

❤ Judge Milan

[@legatoblues13]

Shes absolutely responsible, a) in regards to the law, and b) she cant prove she was even hit and run. Its her responsibility

[@chuck9380]

I have full coverage car insurance and my payments on Autopay.

[@2LitProduction]

Good for you

[@Bih1stOfAll]

🍪🏆

[@keptbygrace6221]

​@@Bih1stOfAll😂

[@Derriayers]

Same

[@denabee5232]

those people were lucky!!!

[@sharifsalem]

She lost control after an accident and just have been going pretty fast to go airborne

[@KEBinAZ]

No crash report?? What vehicle did the police put at fault? The plaintiff had no insurance, therefore she wants this woman to pay for her car?? Get out of here. The at-fault vehicle fled. Plaintiff is screwed and needs to go after the other vehicle if they ever find it.

[@Ididnotmake1]

The plaintiff did have insurance(just not collision, the defendant’s insurance had lapse

[@KEBinAZ]

​@Ididnotmake1 no. Plaintiff had no insurance, defendant had liability only.

[@taralen1101]

@@KEBinAZ No no no. On a controversial people's court case like this when people (myself included) feel Judge Milian got this judgement entirely incorrect, do not get the facts wrong. Plaintiff (woman on the left side of the screen), had insurance/liability insurance. Defendant (woman on the right), had no valid/active insurance. Rewatch the video if you don't believe me.

[@tunisiancrochetchannel]

People don't think about thing like this happening. That's why I've had uninsured motorist coverage for. years. That covers you if an unknown driver causes damage to your car. You don't need comprehensive covered for that.

[@ivannovotny4552]

No such a thing as traffic vehicle accidents, only collisions.

[@lukerinderknecht2982]

Yup.

[@Degorff]

They don't realize the state can cover some of those costs if they fill out the proper forms and file them. Get a Police Report, pay that fee and learn of all your other benefits. However not for the Un-insured lady though.

[@Everythingmusic2024]

Why does the judge yell instead of talking at a normal tone ? Her voice is so loud that I always have to turn my volume down 😅

[@BudduredToast]

A sad case of misplaced blame

[@msfranklin2650]

IT'S NOT MISPLACED WHEN YOU DON'T HAVE INSURANCE IN A ACCIDENT IT'S AUTOMATICALLY YOUR FAULT SHOULDN'T HAVE BEEN ON THE RD

[@cobravids]

If you need yo have just basic i understand. But spend the extra to get uninsured motorist. You dont need full coverage for it. This would have paid off for them in this case.

[@Hdexh]

No insurance you should go to JAIL if you're driving. Change the law.

[@mmmfun77]

Does anyone know what year this episode came out?

[@CorsicaLily]

Strange verdict. In my country, the defendant would have to pay for the damage she caused ( with or without insurance, it would fall under her responsibilities to pay). And then, defendant would have to sue the guy you crashed unto her. The plaintiff doesn't have any responsibility on the matters, as she was not at fault Mind you, neither the defendant, but, she still as fault for colliding onto the plaintif. Here. She could sue him for the cost she would eventually have with the plaintiff.

[@686JM]

@CorsicaLily As another person on these comments said, "Even if the defendant had insurance her insurance company would have denied the plaintiff's claim for the very same reason the judge denied her claim". Think before you call something a "strange verdict" your countries ways are irrelevant to these cases as they are based on USA laws. 🙂

[@CorsicaLily]

@686JM so I can't have an opinion because? You say so? It is a strange verdict to me because the plaintiff got her car destroyed, and nobody paid for it. I was stating that here, the laws protect the victims in these cases. It was just sharing an info. For you to take the time to write a reply only to tell me that I should refrain on sharing an opinion is ridiculous and moronic.

[@kueyang2420]

Guess both of them have no insurance.. shouldn't have the vehicle on the road at all.

[@misscriss80]

You can get Liability only with uninsured motorists coverage.

[@gabrielmichaelspiritwolf3795]

Ppl not realizing if a person not have a license or insurance or dui situation they at fault 100% for being on the road plaintiffs should have spoken to someone

[@fcook24]

Being that she didn’t have insurance, I feel like she should be able to sue her because she did hit her, even though it wasn’t her fault and she should have to go after the guy who hit her. Try to see if there was some kind of street camera or something.

[@Amy-qo6xf]

They answer the same thing at the same time, I'd say they are close. 😊

[@kiyanacarter-davis9997]

That’s definitely not the defendants fault whatsoever

[@Rudeytabooty]

She should be happy she’s alive, why would she get anything when the lady wasn’t doing anything wrong tf.

[@amandabrown6565]

If you want to go the legal route she did do something wrong. She was on the road uninsured. If you have no insurance you aren't supposed to be out on the road. So if she would have been home and not on the road the accident might have never happened.

[@bradconrad936]

Some of you really need to understand the law.... This decision was 100% correct.

[@FrankGiuliano]

No insurance! really.. and driving. FACT: 25%+ of drivers in NYC have NO insurance and are driving.

[@chefjoijoy7731]

You know this fake because by law she is liable to pay them but the judge would side with the person at fault in this case anyway

[@cosmo6180]

Hmm....I thought (like some of her recent cases) the plaintiff could sue the defendant for damages, even tho it wasn't her fault, then the defendant can go sue the guy who hit her??? Guess I was wrong according to this case 😮

[@karismatimara6197]

It’s not her fault but she does have to pay , she would have to go to the person that hit her to get all of her money back .😊

[@sarahbarton4977]

She was beamed down by Scotty of the Starship Enterprise

[@EncantaMiVida]

Because she didn't cause the accident

[@brittanysmith6232]

Wrong decision- no insurance is illegal should not been on the road thus her fault

[@chuck9380]

If you are reading this please go purchase a 3 channel dashcam if not this could be you

[@Tbubbless]

This is why you get a dashcam. I have front and rear dashcam because I was hit and the lady lied, luckily there was a Tesla next to me that had 3 different angles of her hitting me. Oh yeah,,,,, keep insurance on your car, you never know when something will happen

[@tamikalittle6910]

Yea, not to compare JJ don't play about ppl driving without insurance. She was not insured and she shouldn't have been driving the car.

[@jacquelinecassidy7672]

I have full coverage 2007 and 8 but they should pay not paying insurance