Quantum Mechanics: Animation explaining quantum physics

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

To see subtitles in other languages: Click on the gear symbol under the video, then click on "subtitles." Then select the language (You may need to scroll up and down to see all the languages available). --To change subtitle appearance: Scroll to the top of the language selection window and click "options." In the options window you can, for example, choose a different font color and background color, and set the "background opacity" to 100% to help make the subtitles more readable. --To turn the subtitles "on" or "off" altogether: Click the "CC" button under the video. --If you believe that the translation in the subtitles can be improved, please send me an email.

[@wnderer4365]

wow.. thank you

[@IOlympics]

That cat is a good observer

[@myjam505]

Thank you, you did a great job. Music and cat helps a lot with understandings and my mind involving in it. I want work in field if QP now, since young I was wondering about how our universe works, but I have no way to work in this field. Wish you all the best!

[@keithnash1346]

@@IOlympics c c ZZZ

[@ewg6200]

IMMORTAL Is the cat alive or dead?

[@leen5767]

Just imagining how much time this person took to create the animations and then stream for free. Great respect to you.

[@sandokan816]

Knowledge is possessed only by sharing. It is safeguarded by wisdom and socialized by love.

[@takeawildguess8801]

If a bear chits in the woods and wipes its arse with a pinecone and nobody is around to smell it did it really smell?JK I really love this video, GREAT WORK!

[@jonasmeyer708]

imagine what he’s paid to do...

[@ianalen1687]

but what i...t added that loud music?

[@stevenhoog1]

Agreed. But how they got that cat to stay put is remarkable also

[@Prof.Laitharth]

This video was responsible for my interest in quantum mechanics 7 years ago, that led me to the present day where i am now a Physicist. Thank you for these amazing videos, you inspire and amaze millions of people!

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

I am glad to hear that my video made such a major impact. And thanks for the compliment about my videos.

[@aasthasingh4808]

Can i ask u a question based on this video ?

[@sandeeptiwari5189]

I hope it become the same for me too.

[@ap207]

Wow

[@b2savage.]

this will be me

[@John14-6...]

The cat had amazing patience not chasing the marbles. Lol

[@lonewolf2150]

😂 😂

[@JaroGoraJ]

Its Schroedinger cat

[@veramae4098]

Cat people are really upset by Schrodinger's mental "experiment"; I see no signs of that tapering off. 😃😅

[@elchupavidas]

Well, I wouldn't play with something that would change his status and maybe kill me with a 50% chance.

[@RadicalCaveman]

The cat doesn't realize that there's a 50% chance that when the video ends, it dies.

[@ImTotallyNewWave]

I wanted to take a moment to express my gratitude for the video you created on quantum mechanics, which I came across about 10 years ago. It had a huge impact on me and left a impression that has remained with me ever since. At the time, I didn’t understand any physics or mathematics at all. I found the video challenging to comprehend fully. However, I kept returning to it, hoping to gain a better understanding. Watching your video sparked a desire within me to study physics, but unfortunately, I did not have the necessary qualifications in my country at that time. I became determined to study physics and decided to teach myself physics, which eventually led me to leave my job and obtain the right degrees to study physics formally. I am now in my final year of study and this video was a major source of inspiration for me. I wanted to express my appreciation for the work you have done and let you know that you have played a significant role in igniting my interest in physics. Your videos have been a constant source of motivation for me over the years, and I am grateful for the impact it has had on my life. Thank you.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

I am glad that my video made such a positive impact. Thanks!!!

[@K-xor]

Wow. Thank you for this beautiful story.

[@stupidlooser6262]

ya! eugene is amazing

[@dannycalamity]

This video made my jaw drop. Like, no joke, biggest plot twist I’ve ever experienced. It explains things in a way that makes you realize “Hey, uh, this is real. Like, this is the reality we live in and there are still TONS of mysteries that just make us go ‘wtf?’. Major respect. Also- creepiest cat I’ve ever seen. Ever.

[@Milan-db3uy]

It's the first time I have seen an animation video explaining such a complicated topic so well and easily. 7 years late but thank you for this.

[@ramblinrose8]

no doubt...it's just ridiculously hard material to understand no matter how long you've been studying it...and it really is a great example of Schrodinger's experiment...much better than any dry books I've read.

[@VishalSingh-qd6gr]

@@ramblinrose8 You absolutely right.!

[@YashpalKrishna]

i still don't understand. Why for the second observer, the ball to the left enters first and gives the signal?

[@RadicalCaveman]

@@YashpalKrishna You need to watch a video on special relativity! This guy has one.

[@MarkRuslinzski]

I never understood properly either until watching this video now I have an idea

[@tomj210]

the music makes you feel like youre understanding it, even though your not

[@Bhatt_Hole]

Didn't you meant to say: "the music makes me feel like I'm understanding it, even though I'm not"?

[@Drottninggatan2017]

@@Bhatt_Hole Tom probably meant that, but he could not name you until after the fact. Another mystery for the record.

[@GooseLooseMoose]

@@Bhatt_Hole didn't you mean* not meant

[@_catzee]

Bruh I AM

[@TheLondinium]

Music is sound waves. The waves did not pass through the two holes at the same time. That's because you did not observe them, and if you did not observe them, they never happened... however, if you did observe them, it was too late, because the cat ate your ears, and your ears started spinning in opposite directions, and since they did not spin in the same direction, you did not observe in which direction the spins were measured. The probability of the universe knowing whether ear A or ear B are located in swapped positions or in the same position measured earlier is unknown, and therefore the probability that you observed their relative location gave you the impression that you observed everything at the same time. Does that make sense?

[@75blackviking]

Thank you again, Mr. Khutoryansky for the well thought out and very well presented lesson. Your work will invariably educate anyone who takes the time to learn. Greatly appreciated!

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thank you.

[@ws_zilch]

The exact answer to the quantum mechanics is always: "yesn't"

[@NikhilS-1]

😅😅

[@lifeuu]

this deserves more likes

[@StanslaMichael]

Only if you close your eyes

[@xrpedro]

LMAO GENIUS

[@kurosu_is_watching]

Yes no maybe

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Everyone, if you liked this video, you can help more people find it in their KZbin searches by clicking the Like button and writing a comment. I will be posting more new physics videos soon, so please subscribe if you want to get notifications when they are ready. Links to the videos I have already made are available at the end of the video above at 25:19. Thanks.

[@closer-look]

7 years ago I watched this video and came back today watching again.. & still understand nothing!

[@KK-rg3nj]

Damnnn

[@ali_new_world]

They had us in the first half not gonna lie

[@eyup4972]

and it is harder to understand if your english level is b1

[@bluepeacemaker]

I was able to understand everything... maybe it's because I have a superficial notion of what she's saying, which makes me grasp it faster

[@NINJA-ji6jp]

It’s like watching the movie tenet

[@Obmilni]

The combination of music, wave animations, and occasional cat makes this equally amusing and no less confusing.

[@elchupavidas]

And verrryyyyy trippy 🥴🥴🥴🥴

[@bradybelcourt7935]

No way that a cat would just let a marble roll past it!

[@SatishKumar-gv6dg]

Cat is 4th Dim

[@grahampfielding3855]

Correct ... The cat would go nuts patting the marble all over the place:):):)

[@chikumbutsosakala5262]

Ikr!

[@Dark_Ukiyo]

Plot twist: There is no cat just an illusion

[@coco3612]

That's schrodinger's cat

[@stevenreynolds40]

that cat is wondering who fed it lsd

[@stephennielsen8722]

+stevenreynolds40 That's Schrodinger's cat. He's used to it

[@Spooglecraft]

+Stephen Nielsen And isn't.

[@adammehdi9205]

+Spooglecraft Until we check, he's high and low.

[@greenriverutah7047]

stevenreynolds40 I did, 2 hits of blue lips and 2 hits of the second coming.

[@User-nu6km]

kill the cat

[@machina_aeterna]

I tried to understand the double slit experiment for 15 years and this was by far the best explanation.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the compliment about my explanation.

[@Jokedealer]

This is the scariest movie I’ve seen in years

[@kenzybeats9546]

Xavier Lee 🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@DRCole-kq2wk]

Xavier Lee yes and I am a cat......

[@iAmArinGrace]

hahahaha I agree

[@serenekaos2k10]

Watching this @ 6 AM is not recommended.

[@nickw9376]

Some of it was horribly hypnotic and really psychedelic. I still feel a bit strange and I am not watching it while I type.

[@Oggy187]

That cat has seen some thing he can not explain, and even if he could no one would understand him.

[@joshuajosephson7358]

How do you know that? I bet that cat like all the non-human life see exactly what is happening and understands it. Humans don’t really know much of anything. They have a lot of guesses, guesses they call fancy names like Faiths, Theories, Laws. And most of what humans know seres no purpose at all except to serve the petty, infantile emotions of the humans. What told humans they had the right to do anything they do? And I also wonder why they put all their energy trying to figure out quantum mechanics which they have again only guesses since they are extremely limited in being able to perceive or comprehend what they perceive when they can’t even manage to be one species. The truth is that the cat doesn’t care truly. Only human arrogance thinks it’s base curiosity and discomfort at being ignorant is worth what it has cost the other life of this planet. Humans are sick animals. And they are not getting better, for the nature of this sickness doesn’t make anything better, only make it think it’s better. And it always destroys itself. Just as humans have already done and are just to sick and proud to see reality. They would rather see it through their beliefs, theories and laws and pretend that the distorted perception of reality is real and let’s not forget make it into a game of opposition they just call competition for what those sick with this disease always love. Gold and riches, power, sex and being beautiful forever, status and attention and the material possessions which come with it, food, drink and drugs, a life of easy comfort and entertainment. Which in other words is agreed, Lust, Envy, Gluttony, and Sloth, and of course Wrath since they are fighting their own species for these things in a great game of destruction they are so Proud of as if any of them created or could change it that they just call human progress. Just like they call their Evil Good. That is the name of the sickness they have and they have had it for the entire time of heir edited version of human development. Children who decided to play a game of who can be the sickest with evil and convince the most people it is a good thing for the right to see more of the limited resources all humans are forced to work for the same fews profit to survive than one person needs or can use which they call success. Not my theory, not my belief, not my law just the uncensored obvious to anyone not sick with Evil so in absolute denial because evil need can see itself, it denies itself and denies it denied. Then it attacks anything that shows it the truth which is fine because I know what happens and ain’t scared at all. I am scared for the rest of my sick brothers and sisters but there comes a time when an animal is too sick to save. When the only way to show your love is to let it go. Cut your losses. You can’t do tell someone the truth if they don’t want to hear it. You can’t forgive someone who isn’t sorry and refuses to change. You can’t help someone who won’t help themselves, and why would you in the first place. It would only make them dependent on you and weaker. Jus like humans have become less not more because of their insistence their every little desire, their feelings are worth more than another life, including human life. Truth is never kind but it doesn’t need to be, it hurts to hear and also to say especially to someone you truly love who doesn’t want to hear it. You can tell yourself that you are being nice by not saying anything, this you are protecting them but we all know the only one who is being protected is you. This love but there are many kinds of love and that kind is not true, there is only one love that is true. Meaning it doesn’t destroy. And nothing humans love is true. Humans do not dictate the nature of reality with their words, and they do not assign meaning, value and purpose to all life, including their own. Bad answer peeps. Should have done your own work instead of copying from the sickest of your species. again. Yes again. It’s called the Gargamel. And you have no more chances. It’s over. No wonder they are all so desperate now to get that success. That America dream. The land of the privileges and spoiled. Freedom is not just for a small group of humans, 8t is for all Life or it is not called freedom, that is called privilege, and if you are forced to work for the filthy money so you can buy the right to enjoy this privilege that is also called something p, and it’s not freedom. Slavery. The money and attention, the clicks they need to get enough followers, subscribers to catch the corporations and institutions attention. All for the filthy Dollar sign, the mark you all love so much that it’s mark is burned on your foreheads and stamped on your greedy grasping hands or might as well me since it’s all any of you want to touch and always on your minds. I don’t like it any better than any of you. It hurts me to have to say it just as much as it probably does to hear it but shit, someone has got to be honest. And that has never been the humans best kill, just like originality. I am ashamed and embarrassed to be associated with the sick animals who just call themselves human. And I can’t even pretend to believe in them like I have for my entire life because reality has shown me my belief, my guess, formed by my own perceptions and reason not copied from some bearded asshole, is not reality, I ain’t crazy sick with evil like all you demons called American who think their beliefs, just like their words create reality. There is only one law and it is perfect. It is flawless in its judgements and is automatic without malice or mercy. Or jus for your information the mean bearded face of an upgrade of Santa Claus. Children truly. Acting like they are retarded and with all the practice they have had at it you would think they would be better at it. They aren’t even buying tickets to that act. Nope not even comp’d thanks.

[@Fit_soldier]

Has he seen my legs

[@Fit_soldier]

I’ve been looking Obi wan😓

[@ramblinrose8]

what was it Feynman said about Quantum Mechanics "if you think you understand Quantum Mechanics, then you don't understand Quantum Mechanics"

[@ramblinrose8]

@@joshuajosephson7358 humans are animals foremost...so instead of taking a Medieval look at humanity might you seek an enlightened one despite Humanities skewed record...outside of that you aren't speaking rationally at all. You denounce Humanities Laws and then turn around and state there is a perfect law and then share none of that "so called perfect law" with us. Holding something over our heads are ya...well, no one will call THAT nice. It's spiteful. You aren't shouting you are raving. You aren't talking or opening up discussion you accuse but you aren't any Jesus. More like the EVIL person calling other people Evil all the while doing Evil deeds and Evil sacrifices. But your kind is never the kind to sacrifice. Oh you'll have plenty of reasons to argue otherwise but in the end you don't understand what REAL sacrifice is. It isn't sacrifice if you are forced to give. And spite isn't clarity it's anger. Not our fault you feel cheated. In fact you break the laws you say you uphold just by very your very rude behavior. The saddest part of your position is the complete denial in a very over dramatic and extremely heated tone that Humanity is clearly not capable of understanding "perfection" as you view it nor of beauty. Since The Inquisition Ended there have been folks like yerself...telling us "peasants" we just don't understand. Grinding over us with their rhetoric, cut downs and swords. And yet every true scientist is in awe of the actual thing you state is Evil...the fact that no matter how they try to describe "it" the description becomes intangible and yet more beautiful. But where you really step out of line is your placement of "The Law." First how could you even conceive of "Law" unless you as a child were taught in a humanitarian form of what the concept of "Law" is - that means from day one your "ideal" has been swayed by your own lack of ability to perceive "Law" outside of Humanity - gasp!! HUMAN just like the rest of us...!! and that must burn your biscuits...cause here you are telling us or rather inferring how much better you are because you UNDERSTAND above and beyond us mere grunts and yet by your own conditions like us you are unable to "perceive" "law" in anything other way than by being Human. No matter how you slice it, dice it, rationalize it...that is unless you've been hiding the fact that you're what...an Alien? Said not even you!!!! perhaps you don't believe your own rhetoric, maybe yer just a small little troll either way...THAT NULLIFIES your argument. (or in this case like Quantum Mechanics states if you don't look nothing manifests...just the probability of yer brains making an appearance, eh?!!) Even if you were given a "vision of God" you'd still be human...you'd still be flawed and just like the rest of us apes you'd still see YOUR vision of God from a Human position. No matter how you try to avoid it. Okay...so now your hopping mad at me...and we'll just say your "better" than the rest of us since you clearly elaborate as much...If your perception of "Law" is perfect then exactly how as an imperfect person who values something outside of humanity can YOU ever specifically understand it enough to share it...I mean aren't you doing the very same thing to "Law" as what you claim scientists, and humanity and demons and Americans are doing...saying you KNOW about it when you are just like us. Just merely human and therefore "incapable" of understanding it/anything. If you are a Jihadist you do realize that the Islamic Culture gave us Astronomy...if you are Christian you get that Jesus was an Enlightened Human...HUMAN get it? It has been my experience that when one (usually a dictator or an emperor and in this case YOU eyeroll!!!!) states there is only one "Law" they 1.) don't understand the meaning of law which is a human creation 2.) don't practice nor abide by laws 3.) in a bullying brutal manner apply an arbitrary model of the law according to their own opinions. 4.) makeup laws based on emotional and sometimes irrational feelings versus fairness and justice 5.) don't take counsel 6.) reduce laws and fundamentalize and radicalize laws thereby making them not only a mockery of true law but also making the law dangerous 7.) clearly have NO Concept of either The Theory of Relativity or Quantum Mechanics. In the end you are no bringer of light. You bring hate and discord and anger and venom but you find no beauty in God at an atomic level...you can't understand and see the grace of the miraculous infinity of the display of the very essence of life itself is not something scientist don't appreciate but rather something they are in awe and revel in...they revel in God...they delight in God - you just can't see it. And if a cat can get it...as you say...why then, why then, oh why can't you? Enough of The Dark Ages. If you want to scold get your own congregation. Your post is ranting and inappropriate and not suited for this forum. Now go all crazy on me...as Borderline Personalities are want to do...or see if you actually believe in that so called "Law" you toss around with such disrespect and try to live humbly by actually believing in your own beliefs...in Compassion and Forgiveness not Fire and Brimstone...live by acting in GRACE that there IS something bigger than you. Rather than shouting and disrespecting everyone who reads your missive...stop showing everyone on KZbin where your defaults and shortcomings and hatred is.

[@Justintime2grow]

I'm 19 minutes in and my brain feels like it's one ball going through two holes.

[@osscar-nh2vm]

Did you open your eyes and observe where the ball went through?

[@gamingmitmaus6949]

Lol

[@brendanreddmann3613]

No one ball with indefinite probabilities

[@bobdull3148]

And it gets blocked

[@bradleythekid4898]

oddly sexual

[@noahw4623]

Dr. Eugene, I wanted to thank you for this video. This video gave me the epiphany of building quantum circuits using photons which lead me down a several year long rabbit hole into linear optics. Yesterday I made a video game that is using a homebrew quantum circuit attached to an Arduino to design each level. I don't have a PhD, and I'm barely a freshman, but you've made it possible for me to understand the fundamentals well enough to put them into practice, thank you for that!

[@gaber9290]

You are a badass sir! Keep grinding

[@ramyclarck8842]

I hope you share your experience with us 😊

[@jaimegomez2200]

Video: "This is one of the greatest unsolved problems in physics" My stupid but arrogant brain: "I might be able to"

[@fillercontentmedia1268]

Don't think of it as arrogance. Think of it as the drive to be the one.

[@monthstwenty7342]

You never know if you can untill you try

[@killaonmoco]

Maybe, just maybe you already do. 😉

[@igor-ivanov]

Я не понял, в этом видео физическая симуляция или просто анимация, показывающая действительность?

[@abineshanbazhagan6703]

You can ! Every time I used to think of Quantum physics as just thoughts I am like Ready to go,, but when I See an equation ,I'm like " Oh no ! It's not my field of study". But please, if you have interest please do attempt. Don't go with laws and hypothesis or theories. Create your own Theories observing nature. And this can be a motivating line from this Wildlife Researcher. Good day. There is no great genius without some touch of madness - Aristotle

[@OneClickPony]

This is the best cat video ever.

[@nickw9376]

Looks like that's what the cat thought too....I think.

[@QuartuvLarry]

21:49 is when you visually see the cat's mind get blown

[@VICTORdoomm]

my like to your comment is now 69 :D

[@jrdeckard3317]

Quantum physicist walks into a bar. Bartender says, "Weren't you here tomorrow?" Quantum physicist says, "No, but I'll be back yesterday."

[@danielutzu2000]

Third guy enters the bar. Quantum phusicist and bartender: "Ok, now it happened."

[@jett6865]

J R Deckard I’m too dumb to understand this joke.

[@Godplayzdice]

Bartender : I see you're already drunk. Quantum physicist: Good one !!

[@markfoster1520]

This probably happens all the time.

[@israelnemitz8323]

Brilliant

[@bradlyspencer7287]

10:30 You didn’t exist until the cat observed you.

[@eu29lex16]

Ahahah, lmfao, you did exist ! They only said that a conscious observer affects results differently, not that the particles didn't exist before observation, use your head.

[@blmandar]

The background music was scary. My friend sitting next to me asked me which horror movie was I watching.

[@shaikershadbaji7350]

Tell him quantum mechanics horror movie it was

[@MrQmason]

The Day the Marbles Went Through the Holes .......

[@Ken-vl4wk]

We don’t trust you. There is no way you can tell your friend’s position if you were observing him.

[@martinmaillardet6994]

Clever comment Andre

[@pakarlogika4750]

🤣🤣

[@sudhanshu9831]

*That was schrodinger's cat* *ALIVE*

[@shaunleddy430]

Obviously that experiment is flawed at it's core.

[@Harpoika]

Or was it?

[@kingrobert1st]

@@shaunleddy430 The experimiment was floored at its paw!

[@CRITICALHITRU]

Nah, just usual cat, his name is Barsik.

[@DrAdityaReddy]

@@Harpoika Vsauce music intensifies

[@ussamabinnaveed]

Next time my teacher says I haven't submitted an assignment I'll tell her It was submitted it untill you observed it

[@ramblinrose8]

cute if yer 12

[@puleraleaooa8110]

Hahahahahaha

[@nac9880]

Is that a Bunny girl senpai reference

[@taylan-on4lw]

@@nac9880 Finally someone who also watched it lol

[@blackforest1132]

A painter watching video on quantum physics wow.😁

[@youtubeacademy2550]

It's been 6 years now since I watched this for the first time. Once in a while, I have to come and watch it again to only understand a bit more. Great animation!

[@CyrilOracle]

Someone tell Schrodinger that we finally found his cat 🐈

[@rdengin]

And it's alive!

[@icycounter-strikeandleague8431]

@@rdengin are you sure?

[@oriomenoni7651]

@@icycounter-strikeandleague8431 yesnot

[@hamhampangpang_customer]

@@icycounter-strikeandleague8431 Yesn't

[@mari_marinarasauce]

@@icycounter-strikeandleague8431 yesn’t

[@teletrubby]

All those particles must be shy, they behave differently when we look at them.

[@kylerodd2342]

teletrubby Its the same with people. They act much differently when they know they are being observed.

[@MILLERIA]

THIS IS IT!! The universe (and thus, its particles and components) are the reflection of humanity... and as written in Genesis 2:25: And they were both naked, the man and his wife, and were not ashamed.

[@LuisRuizHalo]

Reina Miller Lol, the Bible has nothing to do with this. Get out

[@alibesharatii]

Shame on the particles/ waves all. Including our body's particles/ waves. 😐

[@Ruth-ul3cg]

@E wow wow woe you guys saying nothing to do with bibal. I really feel sorry when people don't know about the god and the word of god which is holy book koran,bibal, bhagwat gita etc. They even don't know the holy book have all the answer. This generation people talk about development that we are advance then before but they don't understand that all technology is basd on past which is discover and invented by great scientist like nicola tesala, leonado the vinci etc. We only changing the appearance and ability of technology, we are not inventing and discovering any new things. Holy book have a code of all answer if you can't decode it don't say that nothing to do with science. And remember that first the spiritual knowledge was born then the science. They are not different its the perception with different angle. Same situation is perceive in different way to the different people.

[@ninohensen7243]

this comment is not here, until you observe it..!!!

[@antoniochiappetta4833]

Nino Hensen beautiful!

[@snowinblood5243]

exactly

[@DeansVideoClips]

If a tree falls in a forest but nobody heard it... did it make a sound?

[@Nothin282]

This is actually an amazing comment holy shit

[@neonblack211]

Truth bomb

[@catherinemoore9534]

I'm totally baffled by this: but I get a real insight into the incredible mystery of our universe. That's worth a lot. Thank you for sharing this video: brilliant job!! 💯

[@mipspc]

Got headache after 5 min trying to separate her voice waves from the music waves.

[@kuroudoakabane1352]

Put a detector on 1 ear, problem solved

[@MrMustangMan]

same here.....

[@noonespecial09]

😂😂😂😂

[@dannydazzler1549]

@@kuroudoakabane1352 bruh

[@solar_genesis]

I had to put in some effort to experience that for myself .

[@WildlifeMoto]

I came for the physics but stayed for the cat.

[@sharlenestiller8921]

Wildlife Moto I came for the cat but stayed for the physics

[@Tore_Lund]

The cat's name is Milton

[@mikes6038]

That cat is very well behaved for how many marbles are flying by.

[@darkokrizanic3469]

my cat loves mr.Schrödinger because it survives his experiment worth of noble-prize

[@nickw9376]

@@darkokrizanic3469 ... or did it?

[@hamedrahmatavar4397]

How great you are and how hard you worked for the animations. Thank you very much.

[@justinstrik7125]

My wife: whatyawatchin? Me: a funny cat video My wife:🙄

[@physicswalemishraji7360]

I need a wife kya life hai aapka kaash main bhi apni wife ke bahon me so pata kitna mja aata hoga aapko

[@notorio526]

@@physicswalemishraji7360 bruhh

[@lxshya3992]

@@physicswalemishraji7360 bhai wtf

[@00seven77]

@@physicswalemishraji7360 😂😂😂 Single forv.

[@anhtungo6820]

@@physicswalemishraji7360 wtf

[@thomask1424]

At first I thought "hey, I think I'm getting this" but that quickly passed and now my brain hurts.

[@vitalnutrients744]

It's simple it's about probability and waves and randomness.

[@kevinbeazy]

thomas k No one understands it.

[@MrMustangMan]

same here..... i was good up until after the marbles going thru the slots creating redshift on the curtain........

[@emiliorodriguez8104]

VitalNutrients if you think it’s simple, that means that you really don’t understand it.

[@vDarknessFalls]

That's because it's all made up. Literally. If you like magnets, check out how magnetism fits into play of our universe and galaxies. Trust me. You won't regret it. Here's how a magnet represents a black hole perfectly. Remember the black hole image taken about 5 months ago? This will blow your mind. kzbin.info/www/bejne/nmq2ZJyhnrFmhdk Here's a video representing the magnetics of our galaxies. kzbin.info/www/bejne/mGXEaGp-m86FfNU Now guess what we would have to do, in order the beat "Gravity" and get off this Damm rock without jet fuel?? Go ahead. Watch a few more of his videos. Especially how he explains how birds know which way to migrate to.

[@petrasmilesable]

You are my hero! This video answered so many of my questions, and left me with many more, he he. I love the music and how it escalates whenever a main idea is being explained. And the Cat! Finally vindicated. Rock on, and thank you for all those long hours you obviously spent creatijg this beautiful, elegant, UNDERSTANDABLE gem.

[@sosiskakiany1785]

Голова сейчас лопнет, но это лучшее и самое доступное объяснение, что я встречал! Огромное спасибо за труд!

[@Albertandearthie]

...?

[@tgrind2586]

Bottom line: quantum physics doesn’t even know what quantum physics is.

[@taurusmonkey8780]

therefore, not science.

[@MikeS-um1nm]

Thomas Grinder Good one!! I'm gonna steal that line if you don't mind! I read Richard Dawkins describe it like this: "If you THINK you know quantum mechanics, then YOU DON'T KNOW quantum mechanics!" It excites me (and kind of relieves me) to know that some of the smartest people, IN WORLD HISTORY, study a subject that even they don't understand!

[@tgrind2586]

Mike S lol I’ve heard that before, and I hope you do use it

[@ruslanuchan8880]

@@MikeS-um1nm Where did you read that?

[@telsport]

@@MikeS-um1nm 184 IQ...says "jive".

[@rogue]

The fact this is actually true just blows my mind- to me it’s a clear signal that things in this universe aren’t what they seem.

[@BogartBird]

Or are they exactly what they seem yet we cannot understand them in certain ways with our limited minds.🤔

[@user-hi2fp1he5g]

@@BogartBird Like interpreting the result of the double slit experiment as our conciseness changing reality. The more you think about it, the more foolish it seems.

[@bitkurd]

It could be you are God and you bond all the atoms together and pick the possibilities you would like to see just with your consciousness

[@bitkurd]

@@user-hi2fp1he5g There are neuroscientists and very advanced scientific models can explain to you that you are the just the experiences and the thoughts, but not the experiencer and the thinker.

[@ferdimanville1901]

We are limited with our senses and tools to truly understand the universe. What does the edge of the universe like??

[@fundemort]

I don't understand why would a person dislike this clear and logical explanation video.

[@BarderBetterFasterStronger]

Cat leg bend wrong.

[@bestseller24987]

This is the best explanation video for this complicated subject so far that I've found. Truly gold

[@shonegervasees]

"If you think you understand quantum mechanics, you don't understand quantum mechanics."

[@elelly1845]

and if you understand, you think that you don't

[@aryananhsirk7604]

But you understand that you don't understand quantum physics....also even hisenberg mentioned about the uncertainty principle of quantum physics

[@daveh6424]

But I didn't understand until I observed that it couldn't be understood. Before that, I simultaneously understood and misunderstood.

[@Pearg0ld]

All I can think is, we can only know the results, I guess, but not know how or why and when we observe something it changes into a normal result that our brain can and can't rap our heads around. Then we all die and explode our brains because now I'm having a stroke from evening thinking that much, this is why people hated science a long time ago. It hurts

[@4doorsmoreguns193]

I understand when I'm not looking, but when I look I don't understand😆

[@eslteacheronline24.7]

Here's the corrected transcript: Quantum Mechanics: Animation Mar 23, 2013 - Uploaded by Eugene Khutoryansky The foundation of quantum mechanics is explained by the following experiment. Suppose we have a wall with two holes Suppose we shoot marbles at it; one marvel at a time. Behind the wall, we have a cloth. Each time a marble hits the cloth, we mark where it landed. As marbles hit the cloth in the same spot more than once, we mark the red mark darker. Some marbles make it through the holes by bouncing off at an angle, but most marvels that make it through the holes continue in a straight line. After a while, there will be many red marks on the cloth; the darkest red marks will be directly behind the two holes. Now suppose the two holes are very narrow. Suppose the marble is very small. Now the result is very different. A striped pattern is produced. The marbles never hit the cloth in the areas between the stripes. All particles in the universe produced this striped pattern, provided that both they and the holes are small enough. No matter how many times we repeat this experiment and no matter what type of object we use to replace the marbles, the result is always the same. Only one known phenomenon can explain this result: Waves. When a wave passes through a hole, it spreads out on the other side. If there are two holes, two waves are produced. When you have two waves, they interact with one another. In some areas they strengthen each other and in other areas they cancel each other out. This creates a striped pattern. This is the exact same pattern that we saw before. This means that all objects really behave like waves, but if all objects behave like waves, then why don't we see a striped pattern for the large marbles? Large objects have much more energy than small objects. Waves have more energy by having a higher frequency. When waves with higher frequencies interact with one another, the pattern is different. Large objects have more energy, and they therefore behave like high-frequency waves. This is why large objects do not produce a striped pattern but small objects do. But, there's still a problem. For a wave to produce a striped pattern, each wave must simultaneously pass through both holes so that there will be two new waves that interact with one another. But, we're shooting the marvels at the wall only one marvel at a time. This means that each marble must somehow simultaneously pass through both holes in order to create the striped pattern. Let's see if this is what actually happens by blocking one of the holes. The striped pattern disappears. Most of the marks are now directly behind the one open hole. Now let's block the other hole instead. Again, the darkest lines are directly behind the one open hole, but if we unblock both holes, the striped pattern returns. Areas that were hit many times when one of the holes was blocked, are now never hit when both holes are open. This means that each marble really does have to simultaneously pass through both holes to produce a striped pattern. Let's test this by putting a detector in front of each hole. We should expect that both detectors will simultaneously indicate that the marble passes through it. However, this is not what happens. Each marble only passes through one detector or the other but never both. Also, once we place detectors in front of the holes, the striped pattern disappears. Now the darkest lines are directly behind the two holes; just as when we blocked one hole at a time. Let's try putting a detector in front of only one of the two holes. It turns out that having even just one detector has the same effect as having two detectors and causes the striped pattern to disappear. Any attempt to discover which of the two holes the marble passes through, forces the marble to pass through one hole or the other and not both. One detector has the same effect as two because once we know of the marble pass through one hole, then we also automatically know whether or not it passed through the other one. A marble goes through both holes only when we are not trying to find out which hole it went through, but when we do try to find out, the marble goes through only one hole or the other. So what if we place detectors in front of both holes and just close our eyes and not look. We don't know for sure what is happening when we are not looking, but we do know what the mathematics describing the waves, tells us. When waves pass through a detector, the waves are altered so that they can no longer interact with one another. This means that the striped pattern will disappear even if we are not watching it. The detectors will cause this to happen on their own. However, the mathematics also says that each wave still simultaneously passes through both holes even with the detectors present, but when we open our eyes and look, we always see the detector indicating that the marble passed through only one hole or the other, and never both. Each wave still simultaneously passes through both holes even with the detectors present. But, when we open our eyes and look, we always see the detector indicating that the marble passed through only one hole or the other, and never both. This means that the marble must be more than just a wave. The wave only describes the probability of where we will see the marble when we look at it. The probability of the marble being at a particular location is given by the waves amplitude. The higher the amplitude of the wave at a particular location, the higher the probability is that we will see the marble there when we look. This means that we can never simultaneously know both the position and the momentum. Before the wave hits the detector, we know exactly what direction the momentum is in. However, we know nothing about the object's position. Immediately after we see the marble hit the detector, we know exactly where its position is, but now we know nothing about the direction of the momentum. Not only are we not able to simultaneously measure the position and momentum of an object, the object does not even have a specific position or momentum until we observe it. If the marble always had a specific position, then the marble would not be able to go through both holes simultaneously, which is necessary to produce the striped pattern. But if all objects are just a wave of probability until we observe them, then this means that the detectors and all the objects the marbles interact with are just a wave of probability too. Suppose we place an object behind each of the two holes. The marble will not down (???) one of the two objects, depending on which hole it passes through. If we close our eyes and don't look, then the wave of probability passes through both holes and each object being knocked down also becomes a wave of probability. Just as each marble simultaneously passes through both holes, each object is now simultaneously both standing up and knocked-down. No matter how long we wait after the marbles have hit the objects, each object will continue to have a probability of still being in the standing position, and each object will also continue to have a probability of being in the knocked-down position. According to the mathematics describing the probability waves, neither outcome is certain. It's only when we open our eyes and look that we see only one outcome or the other. It's not just that we ourselves do not know the outcome until look, it seems that even the universe itself does not know which object is standing up and which object is not down until we actually open our eyes and observe the results. To explain why this is the case, and what this means about the fundamental nature of our universe, let us talk about spin. the direction of the spin of a particle can be described by an imaginary arrow. Particles spinning in opposite directions will have their arrows pointing in opposite directions. Particles are too small to see the spin directly with our eyes, but we can build detectors which tell us that the spin is in the direction of the red plate or if the spin is in the direction of the blue plate. Suppose we think that we already know the spin of a particle ahead of time because we have measured it previously and we line up the detector with this direction. The detector will always give us the same result we measured previously, but If the spin we measured previously is not in the same direction as the detector, then the active measuring of the spin ends up changing it. It is not possible to simultaneously measure the spin of a particle in more than one direction at a time. If we want to know the direction of the spin in the horizontal direction, then we need to rotate the detector. But why does this mean that the universe does not know what in object is doing until we observe it. The answer lies in the fact that we can produce pairs of particles that always spin in the opposite directions. If the two detectors are lined in the same direction, then when the spin of one particle is measured to be towards the red plate, the spin of its partner is always measured to be towards the blue plate. This is true 100 percent of the time. This is still true the vast majority of the time even if we offset the detectors by 45 degrees. We know this based on experiments. If we offset the detectors by 45 degrees, then when the spin of one particle is towards the head plate, the spin of its partner will be towards the blue plate; the vast majority of the time. Suppose the two detectors are perfectly aligned with each other and they are both in the diagonal position. Does the universe know ahead of time that the first particle will be measured to be towards the red plate and that the spin of the second particle will therefore be towards the blue plate? If the universe knows ahead of time that the spin of second particle would be towards the blue plate, then this means that the universe must know that the spill of the first particle will probably be towards the red plate; even if we rotate its detector by 45 degrees either into the vertical position or into the horizontal position. Therefore, if the universe knows the results in the diagonal observation ahead of time, then the universe would also know that if one detector will be rotated into the vertical position and other detector will be rotated into the horizontal position, the two particles will still probably be spinning in opposite directions. But when we actually do the experiment this isn't what happens when the two detectors are offset by ninety degrees, there is no correlation between the measured spins of the particles. When the two detectors are off set by ninety degrees, the spins of two particles are just as likely to read in the same direction as they are to in opposite directions. Therefore, if we start out by assuming that the universe knows ahead of time what the measurements would be, this leads to a contradiction. Assuming that the universe knows the answers ahead of time, implies that most of the time the measured vertical spin of one particle must be in the opposite direction of the measured horizontal spin of the second particle, but we know that this is not the case. The apparent implication is that the universe can not know ahead of time what the measurement of the spin will be and the universe makes up its mind only when the spin is actually observed. The apparent implication is also that when the spin of one particle is measured it sends an instantaneous message to its partner to spin in the opposite direction. If each particle makes up its mind about what direction it's spinning only when it's observed, then we need this instantaneous message from one particle to the other in order to guarantee that the two particles will always decide to spin in opposite directions when the detectors are aligned. This is true no matter how far apart the two particles have traveled away from each other; even if we wait until the two particles are on opposite sides of the universe before we make our observation. This instantaneous message still seems to occur. Until we observe the particles, their spins are nothing more than probabilities, but we need to observe only one of the two particles for both of them to simultaneously decide in what direction to spin. If everything in the universe is made out of these particles, including the detectors themselves, then the detectors are also nothing more than a probability until they are observed. According to the mathematics describing the probabilities of the particles, passing through the detector is not what causes the particle's spin to decide to spin in one direction or the other. Passing through the detector entangles the detector to the particle, in the same way that the two particles are entangled to each other. The moment we look at the detector, it seems to sending instantaneous message to the particle so that the detectors measurement will agree with the spin of the particle this is the same way in which the two particles seem to send instantaneous messages to each other. There are many possible explanations as to what's actually happening and how to interpret these results, and this is a matter of considerable debate, but if we really do have these types at instantaneous messages which are faster even than the speed of light then this creates interesting situation with Einstein's theory of relativity. According to Einstein's theory of relativity, different observers will disagree about which of two events happen first, and no observer is more correct than any other. From one observer's point of view the right particle was observed first and cause the left article to change its spin. From another observer's point of view the left particle was observed first and caused the right particle to change its spin. Therefore, we can't know which of these events is the cause, and which of these is the effect since both points of view are equally valid. In fact, according to quantum mechanics, we can't even know which particle is which. Suppose we have two particles in the container. Each particle does not have its own separate probability wave. There is only one probability wave which describes the probability of measuring the two particles in every possible combination of positions. The probability that particle 1 will be in one position and not particle two will be in another position, is exactly equal to the probability that the two particles will be in the swapped positions. Therefore, we cannot know if a particle we're observing is the same particle we measured earlier. If we think about our container as the entire universe, then this would imply that the universe consists of just one probability wave; governing the probability of all the particles in existence. But if we ourselves are made out of this exact particles, then why is the act of us observing something so fundamentally different from everything else in the universe. This is one of the greatest unsolved scientific and philosophical mysteries of all time.

[@lonni0]

So what is our purpose?

[@dontquestionmyname5490]

seriously dude ? you just put the whole presentation in a comment.

[@Vffjjz]

Thanks for providing the information

[@bradybell6129]

"The marble will not down (???) one of the two objects, " knock down

[@David-84-]

Wow biggest comment ever! Clearly copy and pasted and then translated but, still a big comment

[@lookwhoscomin]

This video is like all my relationships, starts of fun but becomes a headache after 5 minutes

[@JuanValdez-cu4zj]

11 years later and this is still BY FAR the best explanation I have ever seen on quantuum mechanics. Thanks, man, sincerely

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the compliment about my video.

[@juanacardenas2368]

After this video I need to soak my brain in cool water

[@noonespecial09]

Yes..it seems to be too heavy to digest... Isn't it?

[@thevonmunchies9213]

Quantum Physics: It knows when your eyes are closed.

[@Executivepower55]

Its call supranatural... boom

[@heatherrhodge2588]

genius statement! love it! lol

[@addisontolar5314]

Does that imply that the tree didn't make a noise because no one was around to hear it?

[@alext8828]

Reminds me of religion. If you believe, then it is so! Not really, but... Pure rubbish. 100 years from now, people will be falling on the floor laughing. History repeats itself, always.

[@Sempiter]

It is... and that's why is so scary :O

[@dimitristripakis7364]

Now I feel dumb. I better go watch "Idiot fails compilation" to feel smart again.

[@Mistysfedora]

Why do you feel dumb?

[@S0PH14]

@@Mistysfedora just a joke based on reality

[@user-36933]

@@Mistysfedora he is feeling dumb because he did not understand anything.

[@Mirrorgirl492]

What an excellent suggestion, I'm going there right after this video.

[@chisathot750]

tf is wrong with these comments

[@CathyBrook123]

Schrodinger's cat is doing revenge on human being: I'll let them know how it feels to be alive and dead at the same time

[@yok5]

That cat knows more quantum mechanichs than my teacher

[@mohittiwari8934]

Funnyman.,,

[@wouterkoorn26]

@@mohittiwari8934 funnyfeyman

[@brendanb6332]

Priceless :-)

[@mjburger7881]

You can pet him, too.

[@iloveamerica1966]

Kappa Keepo Can your cat recommend a good quantum mechanic here in Florida? I have this cat in a box and not one can tell me if it's dead or alive. They all seem so uncertain.

[@danmatt44]

I very much appreciate the minor music (very unusual in a great way) and the creepy cat along with the explanations of physics in this video. It makes me feel like Im having a horrifyingly wonderful mind exploding revelation; that reality is completely different than how I perceive it, and it makes me afraid. This is how videos that try to take heavy matters and explain them in laymen terms should be; the overall atmosphere of the video doesn't undermine the gravity of its subject matter. It upholds the ideal that physics is a scary serious subject that contains one of the most important messages the universe can offer us. Beautiful.

[@juannavarro9907]

+Dan Kostov Finally somebody got it

[@muhammedcamran4914]

I think the cat is used as a simulated observer?

[@Daniel-dc5mr]

Exactly

[@priyanshughonge6503]

You read my mind brother..

[@powerhouse884]

Daniel Kostov NO, the cat is used cuz the analogy that was used to explain Quantum probability was the one with the cat inside a box 📦 🐱 with a poison bottle..... It says that the probability of the cat being alive or dead is the same until we take a look inside. Thats why they decided to use a cat as the observer in this video.

[@sethjohnson1944]

This music makes me feel like im in a montage of a mad scientist on the verge of a breakthrough

[@valuedhumanoid6574]

I was able to stay with it until 22:36 when relativity came into the game. Each observer saw the particles get chosen opposite of each other, and both observers were correct. The stationary cat saw the right particle go first, the moving cat saw the left one. Damn. I will never get this fully under control. At a high level I can accept it, but when I drill down I lose the grip.

[@xanon4210]

I think the cat's face matches our dumbfounded and lost faces. Interesting video, though. Going to watch more till it sticks and I completely understand.

[@ChristinaMagma]

LOL

[@peterk8909]

Uh, yeah, right. lol

[@DhamankarTejas]

I came here for answers...😂 But now I have more questions.. 😅

[@toddlipira8928]

Then you understand.

[@dogukantombul1045]

It's normal cuz it is quantum physics

[@VishnuPanick]

Then your brain is working well. :)

[@ronakrh]

The more u understand it then more questions will arise.

[@heatherrhodge2588]

thank you! I'm just really curious what qualifies something as an observer?!

[@SMC_trader007]

This is what great scientist Nikola Tesla said in his quote "If you want to know the secrets of the universe than think in terms of of energy, frequency & vibrations" Matter is in the form of wave until we see it & wave has it's specific frequency & energy, if you wanna achieve something think about it, visualise it & your subconscious mind will start attracting that frequency! Which is nothing but the "Law of attraction"

[@MissShiruski]

Not sure why people are complaining about background music. I liked it and didnt even notice it until got to the comment section. Keep up posting the great videos with simple explanations !:)

[@madisampi2770]

because other people observe it(the music) and you didnt.

[@nikonman3971]

I guess the question is, Who is this universe and why are they messing with my marbles.

[@LightHunter47]

Dad joke of the year.

[@ningkon3787]

I'd like it but it needs to stay at 69, consider this comment a like.

"I was trying to pay attention but then there was this weird cat on the video..."

[@tulinalimler1281]

It is the Schrödinger's cat

[@MCosan]

@@tulinalimler1281 Biliyoruz, sadece şaka yapmış.

[@ShawnJonesHellion]

The cat is telling us something. Looks like he's says "even Im not impressed by this nonsense"

[@ishworshrestha3559]

Ok

[@wq2206]

Thanks for the Arabic caption and the great efforts I know understood that well.. شكرا لك على تضمين الترجمة العربية ❤️

[@0paco0900]

Great video, I'm glad the kitty made it through the whole thing without being put in a death trap.

[@Nehmo]

Are you sure? Did you *observe* the kitty?

[@PercyJacksonRules4]

or maybe it was placed in a death trap.... in a parallel universe.

[@vincenzo_roccaro]

Literally one of the best videos I've ever seen!

[@lebigmac74]

You should definitely consider the volume of the background music. It's not background anymore, it's disturbing.

[@alaskanalain]

Only because you observed it

[@aaronmicalowe]

Was fine for me. Perhaps use the volume control? Or listen to it via speakers instead of headphones? It's a problem with headphones, not the audio. If everybody did YT videos for headphones only, people who use speakers would complain. No matter what level video makers choose, a large portion of people will not be happy.

[@DJOpaixMusic]

@Lord Syphilis Shitsmear what's a techno?

[@hitlereinstein8935]

Waiting for harry potter to swoop in on his broomstick, and smote a cat.

[@aaronmicalowe]

@Lord Syphilis Shitsmear One solution would be to invent a new audio format in which a voice track is always forced to be separate from the rest of the audio. Then the web player would mix the two tracks in realtime to offer a stereo output (so you don't get voice in just one ear). Then you could have a headphone/speaker setting to adjust the voice a bit louder for headphone users. Maybe someone who hates this audio who can program can write a solution. That way everyone is happy.

[@adalbertoruiz7651]

25:07 it's because we're not particles, we're not just our bodies, there's something different about our consciousness. If consciousness was just the effect of particles (brain), how would it change the state of things from waves to particles? This is why I think the non-local consciousness theory is right.

[@nmarbletoe8210]

given that a simple electron can show nonlocal effects... it's a fair hypothesis that a brain could do so also

[@RagdollWraith]

physics: makes sense people: watch physics: well now i am not doing it...

[@sweetpea31821]

Schrodinger's marbles 😂😂😂😂

[@relicfog22]

@Nick Tuttle I think, that an h o n e s t man, who has no answer to the question, should literally say: "I have no answer to this question" - so simple, isn`t it? - and save time for other people nearby instead of speaking distracting tales like: "Well, guys, there is a God, you know, somewhere behind all of this..." in ridiculous attempts to hide his ignorance.

[@treewizzard]

@@relicfog22 be careful! a red guy with a pitchfork is going to poke your spirit and burn you if you talk like that!

[@ClickBooom]

@Nick Tuttle if you can excuse a god from being limited to time, space and matter, why can't you apply the same logic to the beginning of the universe? Time itself begun at the big bang, so why should the big bang, or the pre existing conditions, be bound by something that may not have even existed at the time (ha)? Same applies for matter and space. The most honest thing to be said here is "we don't know". A creator explanation is a crutch for ignorance

[@notorio526]

@Nick Tuttle This is the intelligent design argument which is a logical fallacy. Complexity does not imply a creator.

[@bonaparte54]

Wonderful. Exactly what I was looking for. After dozens of videos about this in other channels, it´s the first one I see that explains the role of the spin during observation.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks. Glad you liked my video. I have many more videos on this topic which go into a lot more detail.

[@isacsilveira6770]

I'm 18 minutes in and my brain is like "ok so there are two holes going through one ball"

[@student69741]

Lol

[@LoganAraujo8]

Kind of like how in video games, things don’t render until we look at them.

[@ramblinrose8]

or they just stutter...lol...killer comment

[@markschilder5537]

Exactly and that's why we are living in a videogame or like I would rather call it, a simulation. This simulation doesn't need to spend useless energy for particles that aren't being observed, but it only gives information about particles that are being observed.

[@killaonmoco]

@@markschilder5537 then that would also logically mean there IS a way to interpret the information and make it make sense without observing it. There has to be, we just haven't figured it out yet.

[@ethhics]

@@markschilder5537 Doesnt make any sense to me. If i call my mom downstairs and she answers, yet I cant see her, doesnt that make your entire theory obsolete? Because she isn't rendered (Assumption: Not rendered = non-existent), because I can't see her, yet she responds anyway. Or does the simulation have such an advanced physics engine that simulates sound coming from a non-rendered entity.

[@comentarstasincero]

sim inclusive existe uma teoria (não necessariamente esse termo se aplica porque não foi provada ainda) mas existe sim uma teoria que diz que o univeso é um grande computador. Leia "O Conto do Ovo". No entanto na minha opinião, se as coisas são renderizadas quando olhamos, isso implica na existência de apenas 1 ser no universo. Alguns cientista conjecturam que exita apenas 1 eletron em todo o universo, também. O Todo se dividiu em muitos para que houvessem muitos pontos de vista, mas esses muitos ainda são um só. Ou seja, a toca do coelho é um pouco mais funda.

[@copperymarrow1583]

The secret life of cats studying quantum mechanics

[@killaonmoco]

@22:31, when explaining the entanglement, I got a little excited because that would mean that regardless of what's happening, what we observed was I think the universes attempt to make the insensible make sense to us. It's either constantly watching, making sure we are able to make sense of things around us or it's leaving something a way to monitor us so that things constantly make sense, but as with anything it has imperfections and thus every once in a while, we can see those flaws.

[@yesman8682]

How high are you?

[@prakharsoni6406]

Explained very well! Theory of relativity - Your videos are so interesting that I never know how time passes so fast by watching them

[@charlesmcmillion5118]

The Great Physicists' Road Trip by Ms. Rachel C. Millison Great physicists and a few of their friends from the past decide to return to Earth for one last road-trip vacation to the coast together. They all appear on Earth on the designated evening. Heisenberg pulls up behind the wheel of a gigantic 1930's car, a huge grin on his face. As they're getting in the car, Hubble looks up and says "What a wonderfully dark sky". "Shouldn't be" responds Olbers. "Always has been" says Hoyle. "No, it hasn't" says Lemaitre. "I knew that!" says an embarrassed Einstein. Once they're all in, Teller says "Hey guys, this trip is going to be The Bomb!". "Yeah, but why do I always have to organize?" asks Oppenheimer. "Where exactly will we end up?" asks Kepler. "That's impossible to predict" says Bohr. "I just can't believe that's true" says Einstein. Heisenberg punches the throttle and the old car roars off. "Say - this thing sure accelerates" says Newton. "I don't know, Isaac. It feels like gravity to me" smirks Einstein. Later that night, as they are speeding down a country road, a police car catches up to them and pulls them over.[1] "Do you know how fast you were going?" the cop asks. [1] "No, but I know exactly where I am" Heisenberg replies. [1] The cop says "You were doing 55 in a 35" [1] Heisenberg throws up his hands and shouts "Great! Now I'm lost!" [1] The cop thinks this is suspicious and orders him to pop open the trunk. He checks it out and says "Do you know you have a dead cat back here?" [1] "We do now, a**hole!" shouts Schrodinger. [1] "I think it's time to split" says Everett. "Say, how did you manage to spot us on such a dark night?" asks Hubble. "I saw the light from your head lamps" says the cop. "How fast was *it* going?" asks Michelson. "That's simple addition" giggles Galileo. "Not exactly" says Lorentz. "Look here" says Heisenberg, "how do you know I was going that fast?" "I clocked you over a measured distance" says the cop. "How often?" asks Hertz. "I disagree with your measurement, officer" interjects Einstein. "Don't start tonight, Albert" says Bohr, shaking his head. "What Herr Einstein is trying to say" continues Heisenberg, "is that time was running at a different rate for you than for us". "WHAT!!!???" exclaims Newton. "It's true" says Maxwell. "We're all famous scientists and, believe us, Herr Einstein proved it, though it came as no surprise to me". "Must have been a real eureka moment" nods Archimedes. "Extraordinary!" says Galileo. "Extraordinary evidence" asserts Sagan. "Well, it sounds awfully complicated" responds the cop. "Not really. I'll draw you a simple diagram" says Feynman. Totally flummoxed, the cop lets them go with a warning. As he drives away, Doppler cocks his head and listens to the sound of the receding police car. "Gotta love that" he says. "Amen" responds Hubble. Returning to their car, Lord Kelvin remarks "Sure is warm tonight" "Yep - lots of disorder" replies Boltzmann. "In places you'd never expect" adds Hawking. "I was lucky to get away with that" says Heisenberg. "Most cops think they're better than everyone else". "Yes - I hate inequality" adds Bell. "Though you *were* speeding" says Faraday to Heisenberg. "I carefully observed the needle creep from 35 to 55". "Actually, it was jumping, Michael" replies Planck. "Hey, Max" says Heisenberg, "If you loan me a tiny bit of money, I'll pay it back so quickly you'll never notice it was gone". As they pile back into the car, Bohr says "See here - you must fill the seats in order - no empty spaces allowed. And stop interfering with each other!" "Only one of you can sit next to me!" yells an agitated Pauli. "Say, Werner - it's stuffy in here. Be a good chap and crack the window a bit" says Hawking. "Sorry, Stephen. It can be all the way up or all the way down, but nowhere in between" replies Heisenberg. "Hey guys - Albert and I just figured out a great shortcut. Only one bridge" announces Rosen. "It will save us a lot of distance" says Einstein, "but it might get spooky". Arriving at the beach the next morning, they hurry from the car and stand looking out over the ocean. "Look at the wonderful waves" says Schrodinger. "They don't look like waves to me" says Bohr. Looking down at the fine sand, Dirac exclaims "Look at all the particles!" "Now *those* look like waves" says De Broglie. "This is great!" exclaims Feynman, rubbing his hands together. "Now, lets go meet some girls!" "Sounds good to me!" exclaims Schrodinger. "Let's delay" says Wheeler. "We have to be discrete" warns Bohm. "I need to shave first" says Occam. "What are girls?" asks Newton. 1 Based on, and including the original joke attributed to Rich Granger, Engineer, Battelle.

[@thalesbernardomendes8949]

love the part when orange cat arrives in mini cooper

[@mreggy2767]

i think it is the girlfriend of the other cat, lmao

[@jinxy7869]

u spoiled it man

[@elelly1845]

@@mreggy2767 end whereas tha grand momma?

[@mondopinion3777]

I read a scifi book a while back that had several intelligent races from different star systems. Each race had developed technology out of its own physics. Each technology worked well enough to make interstellar travel possible. Each interstellar drive was unique and completely incompatible with the others -- indeed incomprehensible to the other races. That book really resonated well with my intuition. Perhaps the effect of consciousness upon physics can be different if consciousness can exist in greatly different states.

[@420shroomer]

Name of book?

[@Spinelli__]

You're going to write all that for the world to read and not even bother mentioning the name of the book? LOL

[@citraapriliana5103]

This video is used in our class to understand the basic quantum mechanics, and it's super helpfull and since then i became more and more interest in quantum mechanics. your life will always be blessed for sharing useful knowledge

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks. I am glad you enjoy my videos!

[@malteeaser101]

Starts learning about networking. Ends up learning about quantum mechanics.

[@KingsleyOseiAbrah]

SAMEE!!

[@madhukathel3029]

Controversy Owl mee too

[@Ilinca6]

Controversy Owl network was made by the help of it, isnt it?

[@ayoubmerzak1733]

Learning both : Quantum communication

[@kittentude]

I can relate. Started out one Sunday reading an article on an archaeological dig and hours later realized I was deep in an article on nuclear fusion with no clue how I got there.

[@pedroarmenio]

I admire the way you explain such a complex topic in an accessible language. Great video!

[@jth052]

I’m now so much smarter, knowing just how dumb I am.

[@bryant1996123]

Didn't one philosopher say that?

[@samdashtu2212]

@@bryant1996123 Socrates

[@mobiusklein9140]

@Brainstorming Plus - that comment is bang on. When Feinman said "if you think you understand quantum mechanics then you don't understand quantum mechanics" he was not being facetious.

[@stacismith4534]

Not dumb. We what God meant us to see understand. Why isn't that enough. Have faith. He is in comtrol. And it is proven here. We are not meant to understand it all. But we do have enough control to change these theories by observing...am I wrong? Prove that.

[@RogerBarraud]

Dunning-Kruger Reduction, Step 1.

[@johnconnell8436]

I've been trying to fully understand the double slit experiment for a while now, this is a really good video. At this point I'm sure I'm only slightly less confused than this cat. Nonetheless, very good video. 👍🏻

[@dangogh7419]

Strongly recommend watching this while you have a fever. Adds another layer of understanding (speaking from experience)

[@unclejiggy1]

I'm watching this while hungover and it's just adding another layer of pain

[@futurepig]

I don't recommend it. It's like that time I watched The Matrix on acid and realized it's a documentary.

[@babbittron]

5 min in and my mind has been blown like 4 times already. THIS IS THE CONTENT IVE BEEN SEARCHING FOR

[@Daniel-rm6hj]

Thanks! I love this kind of videos but sometimes i cant completely understand the topic because my native language is not English, but you added subtitles and that's awesome because most of the videos out there don't do that, and i get really frustrated. I really hope Eugene Khutoryansky read this comment, so like me please! You have my subscription and one more like (Maybe a lot more)

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the comment Daniel. I am glad that the subtitles helped you.

[@anoriolkoyt]

Wow, this is BY FAR the most informative and intriguing demonstration of theoretical physics and even some thermodynamics through the double-split experiment. Three pillars are so seamlessly and clearly demonstrated: 1 - Wave and particle behavior 2 - Uncertaincy principle 3 - Entropy (i.e. "information")... that "knowing" that something passes through X (ie, a "state" being idenfitied) immediately implies it did not pass through Y (i.e. a "compliemtary state" is identified)

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks. I am glad you liked my video.

[@dragsterbixing2584]

It means there is probability that Every 60 seconds a minute does not passes in Africa

[@ailtonjosue6817]

Mindblowing

[@TheAnantaSesa]

Cavemen times. True time travel exists by taking a plane to Africa.

[@hulfe2514]

The _Cat_ knows *Everything!*

[@saurabh3847]

lol , agreed thats y i ws watching this with my cat..

[@justamanofculture12]

*She:* "He's probably thinking about other girls." *Me:* "Wondering about how Schrondinger's cat exists and don't exist at the same time."

[@sinister7042]

that has to be a lie we nerds never find girls ;D

[@nickhass7757]

It doesn't do both, the cat as at any time either dead or alive not both. Some people just happen to think their presence and awareness is a prerequisite to existence.... its sort of egotistical and very naive

[@SF-ic2pi]

Time seems to be multidimensional. So all possible things happen at the same time but we only see one (or the other) thing happening depending on what timeline we happen to ride in (a bit of how space exists all at the same time but we only see the piece of space that is close or around us). Time as a whole does not seem to be a distinct dimension but rather a property of space, and since space has 3 dimensions you would expect time to also be 3-dimensional. The next Einstein will probably solve his equations in a manner that will show that spacetime is not a thing, that there is only space and time is merely one of its properties... just you wait.

[@buddhasmack4206]

It doesn't really exist or not exist at the same time. It's specifically one or the other, you just think it's both in your mind until you actually look at it, because it has to be one or the other. But human thinking is not the basis for reality, just our perception of it. This notion of things being 2 things at once and communicating like that instantly over long distances is preposterous. It's along the same lines of saying "if I can't see you, you can't see me."

[@ashtong85]

Is the cat alive

[@juniorcyans2988]

This is the most understandable video I've watched on YT so far! Thanks lot!

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks. I am glad you liked my video.

[@ElonMuchen3737]

Processing saving. The universe is rendered just when we observe It.

[@icommentfornootherreasonth8773]

yeah this is unironically a good arguement for the simulation theory! at least imo

[@praetor7055]

If the universe is a simulation, we can assume that what we experience is future humans simulating an “ancestor simulation” of their historic selves, otherwise there would be no need to simulate us observing, or existing at all. If this is the case, why would the simulation include such a glaring defect as to openly present these bizarre quantum properties to the observer? This in turn completely changes our theory on science and ruins the authenticity of the ancestor simulation for the simulators. Two solutions: firstly, the simulators universe also includes these properties, and subsequently, this is not good evidence that the universe is a simulation on its own or, secondly; the universe is not a simulation and this is how it functions on a quantum level. You decide.

[@icommentfornootherreasonth8773]

@@praetor7055 you cant assume they would be simulating their ancient selves. think of the singularity, maybe that is what we have done. the people who made the simulation maybe put up an experiment with ai and how it would behave and it eventually became conscious (the first humans).

[@Cazanu417]

@@praetor7055 or there are multiple universes with many realities like in rick and morty i know its a cartoon but its based on a real many worlds theory explaining quantum mechanics

[@praetor7055]

JaCk MeOff the manyworlds interpretation is a nice theory of explaining the behaviours we see - unfortunately it is not supported by many in the field

[@tomdrowry]

These videos are unbelievably good

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks.

[@kazenriq]

The graphic engine you are using is amazing!!

[@minarenoir6342]

Amazing video, thank you so much. In love with the cat and the music. And the baffling complexity of it all of course!

[@doggydoggywho]

That's why I love animations. I am in my 3rd and final year of graduation and I finally understood as to why that sort of pattern was observed.

[@havish530]

Quantum Physics - "if you have a crush, it's 100% she doesn't have a crush on you until you close your eyes."

[@noonespecial09]

Hahahahahaha😂😂😂...very funny😒

[@hiteshmodi04]

Eyes are closed or open it is also a probabilistic event......ha ha ha ha....

[@markfoster1520]

What if her eyes are closed too.

[@mobiusklein9140]

also, if you're looking at a girl down the bar to your right and she' looking back, it's 100% that shes looking at the guy to your left.

[@nyxawesome9409]

Reality: If you have a crush, you close your eyes, she's gone

[@premgupta3585]

Now that cAT will RULE the whole UNIVERSE. SMART CAT. Explained like a PRO. GOOD JOB.

[@ramblinrose8]

little slow on that draw aren't ya? Cat's owned the Metaverse for a while. Yer still stumbling around with a single universe...go figure.

[@diegokher]

this is now one of my favorite videos, thank you so much!!

[@esmakoylu2942]

Diego Kher is everything ok?

[@bluepeacemaker]

One of the best videos I've ever watched. Thank you a lot for providing us with top quality education in a simplified and free way. I really mean it! Also, the background song does not hinder understanding the content of the video, at least for me. I've seen some people complaing about it, but maybe some of them can't concentrate, or something.

[@chiraagkaran9612]

That cat comes in my dreams now

[@ramblinrose8]

lucky you

[@pushkarkumar2968]

"Anyone who is not shocked by quantum theory has not understood it." -Niels Bohr

[@simonmasters3295]

More on this here: en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Talk:Richard_Feynman

[@ME-ru4hv]

Or understands that it is a childish way of describing how we don't really understand everything we observe. The problem is that you believe everything you are told.

[@philipschroeder5427]

I didn't know there are already any people understanding quantum theory.

[@myfrequencies1912]

When I first heard about this I was just like "Yeah ok, I'll go with that". I think humans can be very accepting of radical sounding new information especially if it comes with the "science" tag line. I certainly cannot replicate this experiment, but I believe what the people who have done it tell me about the findings.

[@_catzee]

Damn you must be pretty strong if you can Push a kar!

[@josidasilva5515]

From a parallel perspective: A camera (observer) films a dot (particle) mounted on a propeller; with a slower shutter speed the dot turns into a blur (wave); a shutter speed equal to the rotation shows a dot at a single position; twice the shutter speed of the rotation shows the same dot at two positions 180 degrees apart (0,1).

[@yudoball]

If we keep using this analogy then faster shutter speed means measurement which results in 2 observable peaks (just like as if the particle only goes through one slit) and slower shutter speed means no measurement so a blurry image or interference pattern. Beautiful analogy. Thx for sharing!