Pixel 4 VS $5,000 A7R3 Camera - Can You Tell The Difference?!

Today we're comparing a phone to a 5,000$ camera. Sony A7RIII vs. Pixel 4 XL. Can you take good photos with a smartphone? Are mirrorless cameras better? Let's find out!
▹ NEW Lightroom PRESETS PACK (how I edit my photos): pierretlambert...
▹ Learn Photography in 30 Days: pierretlambert...
◦ GEAR I USE
▹ Phone used Pixel 4 price: geni.us/O0HZ (see on Amazon)
▹ Main camera: geni.us/4Fwb (see on Amazon)
▹ Full list of my lenses & gear detailed here: pierretlambert...
◦ MUSIC I USE (both)
▹ Great Music here - you get 30 days for FREE: goo.gl/vgkStV
▹ Another 30 days of FREE music here: bit.ly/musicbptl
◦ COME SAY HI:
▹ Instagram: / pierretlambert
▹ Twitter: / pierretlambert
▹ Facebook: / pierretlambert
▹ Website: pierretlambert...
◦ RECOMMENDATIONS:
▹ Dive into the minds of great photographers, filmmakers & artists, listen to the PODCAST (available iTunes, Google and more): pierretlambert...
▹ Learn how I became a photographer, get my story: goo.gl/NyT83e
◦ FRENCH CHANNEL:
▹ Photography videos in French: / @pierretlambertfr
◦ TOOLS FOR CREATORS:
▹ Research, plan and publish videos faster: bit.ly/tbbdyPierre & bit.ly/vidiqPie... both have a free version
Note: intro and outro music from / dogjames & / randuski
Some of those links are affiliate links, it doesn't cost you more and it helps me to continue this channel thanks to a small commission I receive. Thank you if you use them, means a lot!

[@Pierretlambert]

Gooooood Morniiiiing!💥 Drop your guesses below! 👇👇👇 Also Come say hi on Instagram! ♥️ Instagram.com/pierretlambert

[@ezy_id]

Do you have a link of your video, how was being a ponsel photography???

[@ssaini5028]

Scary how good the Pixel 4 is, very small sensor. But you can easily tell it apart from a DSLR, software can only do so much, big sensor there is no replacement for that. That Bokeh from the Sony is beautiful! I wonder what the Pixel 5 will bring next year

[@LOUISVILLECARDINALS]

Were did you get that case I want one for my 4xl

[@santiagomoncadamejia2218]

Which city is this one? It looks very cool aesthetically. I'm from Colombia so that's why I don't recognize it.

[@avayarajbanshi532]

@@LOUISVILLECARDINALS brother did 4xl has raw mode or manual mode?

[@mejdi7755]

Of course we can’t tell the difference when watching a KZbin video on a smartphone’s screen!

[@Quoutub]

In particular because they were edited. Basically the only advantage would be a higher resolution. That's why a comparison with edited photos is boring. It would be basically nothing else than a megapixel comparison. If one wouldn't edit and wouldn't use manual settings, the Sony would have no chance.

[@999torres]

Hey I can watch native 4k on my smartphone and at 90Hz

[@mejdi7755]

Ernesto Torres Good for you!

[@mejdi7755]

@mrmarcus ! and what about the other 5%?

[@Walkercolt1]

@@999torres No you can't. Read the specifications on your phone. It only supports 525 lines of vertical resolution @60Hz in the United States.

[@PipDngns]

The pixel 4 has a scary good camera.

[@MarshallSmith27]

i am now terrified of the pixel 4

[@Anderson_Anderas]

lots of smartphones and dslr cameras or even cinema cameras are very similar in PERFECT situations, like those in this video.

[@adamyadhiman1420]

iPhone 11 pro is even better

[@PipDngns]

@@adamyadhiman1420 nah I had real world experiences with the 2 phones. In photos yeah thr features in the 11 pro is great but compared to the pixel 4 it's not that great. In video maybe but photo I'd prefer the pixel 4

[@PipDngns]

@@Anderson_Anderas true tho, it's how you use it that matters.

[@benjiang9789]

Based on my experience, the greatest differences between a camera and cellphone are revealed when we take photos of people. The subtle shades of skin colours.

[@sdb87149]

Also depends on the lighting. Something with really funky lighting, the huge sensor has a much greater dynamic range. Also anything in dark, at night or long exposure isn’t possible with a phone

[@matthewknight1252]

So glad you were the first search result so far LOL thanks for contributing your gifts, brother!

[@RoamRoadless]

Can you do a side by side with them? It would make it alot easier to reference that way

[@Pierretlambert]

Will do

[@nguyenchau3800]

The thing behind the camera and the phone is the difference, that’s all. All I can see is both picture are really well made :D We have same story on audio side.

[@Pierretlambert]

Haha thank you!!

[@videostop7564]

Let’s say for instagram the pixel will do just fine 😂

[@WhoIsSerafin]

You can’t tell the difference on KZbin but in person camera phones just don’t compare and aren’t even close on print or on a decent monitor.

[@mikecarr1484]

Have you seen photos taken by a newer phone. ? I think not.

[@mikecarr1484]

My pixel is faster in every way. Shelved my 1200 cannon pixel takes just as good raw photos.

[@WhoIsSerafin]

Mike Carr would a I phone 11 count? :)

[@WhoIsSerafin]

Mike Carr oh geez!

[@opaliittiopa]

@@mikecarr1484 A phone will never be as good as a real camera, mostly due to the size. You just cant fit very large sensor into a phone. And I used to think that phone camera is good enough and then I bought a real dslr and learned how to edit properly and damn the difference with smartphone (huawei flagship) was massive. Even the unedited RAW photos were sooo much different. The phone RAW photos were ALWAYS noisier, less sharp and colors were off. If smartphones were as good as dslr's, why would anyone take photos with large and heavy cameras anymore?

[@creedpowell]

I'd love to see you print these photos at a sizes larger than a cellphone screen up to 20x30 and see if there is a difference.

[@Quoutub]

Christopher Powell Not necessary, one just needs to show a crop or zoom into a photo. But even then, it would be basically nothing else than a megapixel comparison.

[@creedpowell]

@@Quoutub . A digital screen and a print show different results.

[@creedpowell]

@@Quoutub also the size and type of pixel matters. I have been printing photos for 35 years. There is a difference between almost every source beyond mega pixel count.

[@creedpowell]

@@Quoutub for example a 12mp full frame camera and a 12mp 1" sensor offer very different results.

[@Pierretlambert]

Yeah would be good! I did a print run with a phone pic. You can tell in the small details!

[@dude157]

I have a pixel 4, but I'm envious of the skyscraper water reflection on that A7R

[@1029db]

To be able to put a phone with that kind of camera power in your pocket is honestly amazing. The Pixel does so many things besides just camera. The dedicated camera will always be better, but being even close is amazing!

[@supaahflyy]

If you think about it, with the pixel you get portability, an attached phone and computer as well whilst still being in the ball park as a full dedicated $5000 camera. Which is insanely good really. Gives nearly everyone the hardware to take great photos

[@wearefromserbia9714]

Absolutely agree

[@miscbrahh]

6A and B was one of the most obvious differences and the reason I only use smartphones as backup

[@gukhyeonkim4416]

6A BEST PICTURE!! ㅋㅋㅋ 스마트폰의 한계라고도 하죠

[@brokeguy5607]

6-B would have given the same result had he put it on portrait mode.

[@brokeguy5607]

@First Comment Finder BOT There isn't much difference between Digital bokeh on smartphones and the one the we get from a DSLR. If you need to click photos for editing then why click them on smartphone in first place.

[@ANDREWKARELIN]

​@@brokeguy5607 none of smartphones will not give you such a sense of depth the good DSLR/mirrorless camera has

[@brokeguy5607]

@@ANDREWKARELIN As I said, smartphones are no less than DSLR when it comes to point and shoot images. But if you need details for editing then why even use smartphone cameras in first place.

[@vinade2100]

I think there is no difference in infinite focus but when you shoot close objects, portrait style kinda, that added bokeh gives the pixel away. Sometimes it worked flawless but some shots you can see where its struggling, like hair, those yellow grasses. So very very fine detail. For instagram totally fine, for business... Depends on your client and what he'll/she'll be using it for.

[@Pierretlambert]

True! Can't wait to try on portrait thought! It really improved lately. Will never be the same but fun to see anyways,!!

[@vinade2100]

@@Pierretlambert it's definitely worth it, since you can adjust your background blur in post as well! So if you are not satisfied or it messed up, you can just add more or less bokeh and safe your image.

[@dragonspecpc]

Totally agree. If someone was blowing the images up for a print or canvas; you'd notice it for sure.

[@מוטיבני-ס1ת]

The real test is indoor photography with minimal lighting. Outdoors most modern phones look great cause there is enough light.

[@worldmagnified69]

You made me so nervous. I was so afraid you'd drop your phone into the water. Then you'd panic and kick your camera into the water too.

[@nay4n]

Great video as always! The Pixel 4 camera is truly amazing, was hard to tell the difference up until the leaf shot, then you could tell straight away with the quality of the bokeh on the A7R3. The portrait video will be interesting because the Pixel 4 takes amazing portraits. I look forward to it!

[@Pierretlambert]

Thanks!!

[@everwinter]

They both look simillar, the fact that it was even hard to differentiate, you'd go for a cheaper all in one phone and camera. Pixel 4 ftw.

[@thelegalconversations450]

Usually I do not find much of a difference when taking photos with camera and mobile. The real test comes when I try to print them to put them of a wall. That is when the pic from the camera come out to be on top.

[@chinnychris4901]

Watched this on a 27 inch monitor, and a lot of the photos I like turned out to be pixel ones! Great job to Google and your editing to that!

[@AviusX]

Just got this video in my recommended. I got 4/6 right. One suggestion I have is to show the photos side-by-side instead of showing one after the other when doing comparison videos. Makes it a hell of a lot easier to compare instead of rewinding and forwarding the video over and over again.

[@IndianPolish]

Finally the respect pixel deserves. 🙏🏾

[@koynov333]

ofc there are differences on bigger resolution. I can't understand why so many people compare pfones with real cameras

[@williamashrafzadeh3701]

the point isn't that there is no difference. the point is that the difference is shrinking as cameras on phones get better

[@petermuller5896]

@@williamashrafzadeh3701 the difference didn't change at all. Nowadays they just add make up for the phone cameras to hide how bad it really looks compared to a camera. Some phones make unrealistic sharp pictures because of all the "make-up" as I like to call it and destroy a lot of the footage in my opinion. Plus the phone sensor is way smaller then a camera sensor so a comparison really is=bs

[@glorious240fps6]

@@williamashrafzadeh3701 "as cameras on phones get better" - as if DSLR and other real cameras aren't getting better?? The technology in real cameras aren't just sitting duck. As the phone cameras are improving,the real cameras are also improving. So the delta between phone cameras and real cameras isn't shrinking a bit. It's the same arguement about smartphone performance and desktop performance.

[@williamashrafzadeh3701]

@@glorious240fps6 the tech in larger dlsr cameras aren't advancing at the same rate as phones are so the delta is shrinking (with the help of computational photography), just at a slow rate. Theres a limit to how many mpx you can have on a sensor. for example, we probably wont see a 50 mpx m4/3 anytime soon. So for now, we effectively have a plateau (for smaller formats, which should be obvious) which allows smartphones to catch up a bit. But mpx aren't everything and computational photography is helping smartphones a lot. dont get me wrong I hate automation but you cant deny how far. smartphones have come. Also the market for better cameras in smartphones is far bigger, leading to more R&D in those areas

[@williamashrafzadeh3701]

@@petermuller5896 I agree that phones make an excessively over sharpened image and I don't like it either. However, phone sensors are tiny in comparison, so the fact that the images aren't wretched is a miracle 😂 again I agree comparing full frame to a 1/2.5" sensor is pointless though

[@ezequielgervasio]

It's hard to see the difference about both camera because we are watching on a smartphone's screen, would be easier see the difference on a PC's screen, but the pixel 4 camera is really amazing. Great video! I'm new here, I subscribed right now :)

[@abanemarcos5502]

Amazing video

[@stevenhe8455]

Well if the photos are all that small, it's kinda hard to tell the difference. If you make all the photos in their full size, it's easy to see the differences.

[@soubhikchakraborty6014]

1,2 photos of pixel 4 so impressive. Even naket eyes can't make difference

[@TheVlatko666]

I can clearly see the difference even with the KZbin compression, photo number 1 Sony contained way more detail and it's properly exposed, photo number two is even easier to tell the difference, look at how distorted buildings are on Pixel 4, they look like they are being bent inwards and blown away by wind at the same time. Whereas on Sony camera, the buildings do not have any distortion. It may not be enough for some to go with a camera, but that makes the whole difference to photographers. Plus, people forget all the time, photographers do not buy professional cameras just for the image quality, they buy them for reliability, functions, and versatility when it comes to lenses. Cameras are real workhorses, they almost never fail, and they deliver in all kinds of weather conditions, they are the AK-47s in photography world. Whereas a smartphone is the jack of all trades but master of none, sometimes images look good, sometimes they don't and if l tried to use my smartphone as a camera it wouldn't be able to keep up with my needs, not to mention the fake bokeh it creates with its stupid software, whereas cameras create buttery smooth bokeh with lenses.

[@helloworld7818]

The video is too long for the actual pictures. The whole video is how he does the pics instead of showing them

[@zamirz8456]

Its the most interesting part of the video honestly

[@JeremiahBonds]

watched this on a 60in tv screen and wow. WOW

[@petermuller5896]

And the camera won 60zoll Samsung/4K

[@E11or]

I like this channel alot! Best luck from germany

[@cado2009]

What a beautiful place! The light was great. I felt like being there the moment you were taking the pictures!

[@ToeKneeChestnut]

I need a link for that Pixel 4 case more than I need air to breathe.

[@vedroit]

10:01 omg i was thinking that 5-A is a7r3 photo before i watched the end of the video seriously, pixel 4 takes a photo as well as mirrorless camera for 4/5 photos from 6, it's soo cool

[@peekatchu921]

Wow that foreground leaf shot was amazing, both the Sony and the Pixel

[@kuscollama9522]

Nice video! I shoot with Pixel and Sony Alpha, both have their strengths and weaknesses, both are fun and both work well. Thanks for the video.

[@bthdimension]

In this resolution and at that picture size, I can't even tell the difference in image quality of a Phase One vs. a toaster ...

[@liamhewitson417]

If you know photography you could tell why is everyone hating on the comparison it was fair and most of the pictures you see are probably on Instagram he put a lot effort into the video so why can’t we just watch and enjoy. Thank you Pierre.

[@joseortiz6255]

Some time ago Sony dethroned the DSLR system one day a cell phone could dethrone the mirrorless system...

[@dhanang]

Yeah.. a cell phone with Sony sensor.

[@strixxx896]

@@dhanang yeah👍

[@petermuller5896]

@@strixxx896 Nope that makes literally no sense.. you just CANT compare a full frame Camera with a phone.. y'all better be trolling me

[@strixxx896]

@@petermuller5896 jk m8

[@jonathanvu5370]

I think it's easier to compare the photos if they were side by side so we don't have to go back every couple seconds to compare Also I was able to get 5/6 correct!!

[@mwangiplus-]

For colour, dynamic range, focusing and exposure phones have become very good. I wish camera manufacturers can make improvements at the same rate as phones. You will tell the difference between a photo taken using a phone and camera with a larger sensor when you zoom.. Camera photos look better. I shoot with both and that is where I see the main difference.

[@ekspresija101]

Comparisons between pro cameras and phones on youtube pretty much look like racing between a sport car, let's say porsche 911 and some budget family car like toyota corolla, but with speed limiter on a porsche to match the speed of a toyota. If you want fair comparison you need to pull out the maximum out of both devices, make long exposure shot of that lake, shot portrait with 85 1.4, do a macro shot with dedicated macro lens, do a moon shot with telephoto.... don't just do random snap shots and call it a day.

[@olivierfichantfilms8614]

Milos Momcilovic you totally summarized the vacuity of this video in a couple of sentences.

[@tatyanapavlova1397]

I could see more details on camera pictures so it was easy for me to guess

[@petermuller5896]

Yes also if you're watching on your smartphone you cant see the full potential of the camera

[@PattyBlogs]

Great video!

[@lucawemmer5433]

It's a bit like a "can you hear the difference between a 100$ guitar and a 5000$ guitar" video😛 but the phone does a quit good job

[@prathamgautam5797]

potraits are awesom on a7r3😍😍just love it

[@CarlosDelcristo]

Great video. Could you tell what pixel case are you using?

[@statiraprs1471]

When smartphone cameras reach professional photography cameras, then professional photography cameras have reached professional telescopes.

[@willl5250]

0:07 when you steal the review units

[@frederikvanreusel]

Phones simply will never be able to match a M43, APS-C or FF sensor, but I must say, it looks really impressive for a phone

[@landmine8206]

Awesome shotz brother! I will go with the mirroerless and also I've heard that edge detection of pixel 4 in portrait mode is bad.

[@Zerokimchii]

A lot of people talk about the "camera" only but i don't see anyone mentioning lenses, which is a huge playing factor in Photography. Aperture, AF, glass quality... Smartphones for now have f/1.8 aperture. But there are camera lenses out there with even bigger Aperture.

[@striderberserk]

Your wrong, f 1.6 has been on quite a few older and recent Android smartphones, and is on the new iphone 12 releasing soon

[@awildanieves8744]

really FUM FUN to watch you n learning with youre tips!thanks!!

[@Pierretlambert]

Thank you!

[@tunapv]

I can’t tell shit a part in my iPhone since it only plays vids at 1080p 😂😂😂

[@roronoazoro8473]

Thank you bro really you are good photographer 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

[@ivezicr]

Nice video man👍 But last one was awesome 😃😃

[@Pierretlambert]

Thank you!!

[@ThatGuyInVegas]

Why do people make these videos? No one argues that cell phones are miles above he old point and shoots. Pixel depth, sensor size, RAW files, fine tune camera controls, and lens options obviously make APS or full frame cameras better. On screen via a KZbin video, you aren't going to see drastic differences especially when you are matching the settings between phone and camera.

[@Pierretlambert]

Because I like to have fun when I go out and shoot :)

[@Pierretlambert]

And what you said is right. On small screens it's hard to see. Yet that's how we look at 99% of our images :o

[@aperez4198]

I noticed that all the KZbinrs comparing Google Pixel to cameras use static subjects only. Is it because using moving subjects will not give them the shocking result they seek?

[@lazaroalonso467]

So the real question here is, are you selling your gear for the pixel 4, lol.....

[@Pierretlambert]

Haha not yet: p I love my baby great to much :p

[@lazaroalonso467]

I know your feeling. I own both the Sony a7r3 and a9 and it sucks knowing that smart phones can practically do the same work without any efforts on the photographer. I do a lot of wildlife and BIF and no smart phone can keep up with that, (thank god)......

[@Minoritynomad]

@@lazaroalonso467 BLAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. NO!!!!

[@PipDngns]

@@lazaroalonso467 hahahaha

[@petermuller5896]

@@lazaroalonso467 Stupid comment Phones will always lose

[@alswellgray]

Of course u can’t tell a difference until u have the picture before u on a screen.

[@petermuller5896]

I watched it on my 60zoll/4K Samsung-TV and the camera definitely won. End of the comparison:)

[@carljohnson3090]

Lol 😹😹😹 4k screen has 2160×3880 it is 8.2mp Pixel 4 xl=12mp Dslr=24mp So u cannot see the diffrace in your 4k and television may not crop if u need to diffrance buy lg 8k

[@petermuller5896]

@@carljohnson3090 i testen PM by now lmao

[@petermuller5896]

@@carljohnson3090 your comment makes.actually no sense. Even when it's 4k.. it shows plenty times more sharpness than your smartphone screen

[@petermuller5896]

@@carljohnson3090 just the size of the tv is enough to show more details than on your smartphone. Phone sensors footage(video or photos) Look crappy on a bigger screen(in general) My tv doesnt has to be 4K to show that cameras take better pictures... oh btw megapixels ain't shit...the sensor makes the quality

[@carljohnson3090]

@@petermuller5896 but sorry i have got sony Xperia 1 and my phone has 4k screen and this 4k way better than tv4k due to smaller screen but the smae quality as tv it means much more indvidual pixels (700ppi)

[@dragonspecpc]

It's cool to see a comparison. I bought the pixel 4a 5g months before I ever started following Pierre. But I just bought a Nikon and use both together.

[@MaxKoenig-Mk001]

The last picture was the most obvious to me, on two others I was wrong. Didn't think it would be that hard to tell

[@Gylyton]

After this video i need Pixel 4 :D

[@allornothingproductions6690]

The only problem is the storage. 64gb and it's not expandable.

[@Ausfailia]

@@allornothingproductions6690 I've owned my 4xl for almost a year and still haven't gotten close to 64gb

[@faizy2591]

Pixel 4xl is such a dope phone😍

[@Andrey.Balandin]

Is the portrait photography Pixel vs DSLR comparison coming out?? Loved this review!! I think Pixel 4 did an equally good job as DSLR and I couldn't tell which is which for the life of me. Except the leaf of the water shot benefited very much from the blur on Sony. That said, the shot with grass in the foreground benefited from less blur on Pixel shot (because on Sony the foreground grass just turned into a blob).

[@salmonsmoothie]

Smartphones are never going to beat out cameras. Wide angle photos in broad daylight won't look much different, but when it comes to low light and zoom the camera will always out on top. Smartphone sensors have to be tiny so they're terrible in low light. And of course digital zoom is no match for optical zoom.

[@pepedombo3819]

Come on, this movie is total bullshit. Comparing images that are maybe 300px wide on compressed YT movie :P You don't really need to mention low light situations, it's enough that poor smartphone will get into shade and its ISO hits 400 or 800 and then NR brings doom to these matrices and image detail. Photos from phones are good when viewed on their own displays. I wonder if people who watch videos like this also find themselves comparing 40W bulb to 500W halogen :P

[@SuperAbel17]

WoW, El Píxel es impresionante ! 😍👌

[@Anderson_Anderas]

em condições perfeitas, vários equipamentos se assemelham, incluindo celulares e câmeras de cinema.

I noticed, all photos with the Sony have a green-ish tint to them, that also gave it away kinda... lol

[@adsarasin]

Really? I feel that canon is greenish. Sony has kind of over saturated blues in my experience with the two camera systems.

[@ajreyes1262]

@@adsarasin depends on which model you use.

[@adsarasin]

Aj Reyes well that makes sense 😝.

[@Crustenscharbap]

Starting at 2:20.

[@georgbartel4245]

Impression comparison ! But please continue your photowalks 🙏🏻

[@HeLithium]

Except 1 and 2, other sets are easy to tell, just judging by the blur effect😂

[@RemyMartinVSOP]

Anyone else on the edge of their seat with both phone and camera leaning over that ledge 😰😂

[@_zoe_3377]

Please make it more please About phone camera and the expensive camera love to watch

[@hilalkhurshidkhan3546]

The beginner photographer will say that mobile is good but the pro will say the camera is good

[@TheAmaksi]

all show a comparison where the difference is not visible. You need to take a photo where the difference is very visible!

[@dhivavanpersierahman2600]

I think the best handling is phone but for the picture is camera📷

[@jayc9184]

You should turn the A7Riii into a planter and step up to being a pixel4 Master Representative. The Pixel algorithms was generating depth of field.

[@daffo1179]

Am I the only one how watches this video on a 4,7" iPhone 6 display?

[@5m4llk1ng]

I owned the Pixel 4XL and I still think the Sony still produce best photo.. Pixel photo is still impressive for social media.. It also requires less step to upload compared to the DSLR..

[@AlixPeaks]

If you can replace your camera by a phone, you don't need a camera.

[@AndrewWilsonOz]

Thanks for another great video. Nice new shoes btw. :)

[@Pierretlambert]

Cheers Andrew!

[@KristineJohnson_]

The camera was definitely better when capturing the water and the city in the background. :) So glad too...thought I wasted money on my camera and should have got a pixel 4 for a sec. LOLOL

[@PIXELvoiz]

at what time you start shooting in the morning?

[@luatnguyennamkhanh]

Comparing a phone and a pro camera is really exaggerated. Any well trained photographer would pick anything with glass and sensor and capabilities to take picture and still make great picture anyway. I’m tired of people keep comparing picture from a phone vs a camera because it’s very different kind of technology with various pros and cons which cannot be compare together.

[@Lendiz]

The Pixel 5 is right around the corner. Can you make a video like this with that one?? (When it drops ofc)

[@hirzifazari4496]

Who else give up and skip straight to the result 🙌

[@downsidegli5792]

Morning....... So hard to pick one both doing awesome shot but one advantage of your phone you always carry with you 😂💝 thank pierre🙏🇳🇪

[@rahul-wx9iv]

Dslr vs smart phone ,that's not fair

[@avradeep999]

Smartphone cameras will definitely kill DSLRs one day. Even now I use S20 and S9 plus both have great cameras and they take some seriously great shots even sometimes better than a DSLR.

[@fdanny03]

Some are easy You can just tell from the DOF No matter how fancy the camera on a smartphone, it will never be able to mimic the natural DOF from DSLR lenses

[@christianleo3135]

When you zoom in or shoot low-light photos, it's like 1 light year difference!

[@Anderson_Anderas]

specially if you watch it in a 4k monitor or tv, or even if you don´t "send the files" to you

[@FaisalMovieRoll]

Big difference, there is no comparison, Dlsr is clear winner.

[@EnzhuZamaa]

Good morrning Yes it is 1 AM in Indonesia

[@carlosovni7100]

Right now the only advantage of the camera is the depth of field, with good eye you can take similar picture with the smartphone, with the camera you can editing at the max level. Another thing, you can't notice the difference between camera and smartphone in physical pictures 3" X 7" you can't notice the difference up to the size 4' X 3' (poster)..... Is hard to admit but... That's the reality.

[@ilovelasagna5632]

"A poor craftsman blames his tools", I have a s10e which can shoot at 4k60 but im still buying an a6000, the quality might be worse and it cant shoot 4k, but having a camera instead of just your phone feels so much better

[@carterlrae]

@Pierre T. Lambert Where is the comparison version with the portraits?

[@dylanpower1438]

Is it a good idea to upgrade my iPhone XS Max to the pixel 4xl. What r the advantages and disadvantages

[@Flyinginthebluedream]

Sony should install the Google Pixel software processor inside their mirrorless camera

[@chris_eschner]

At a quick glance I honestly couldn’t see any difference... shocking...

[@Pierretlambert]

Right!? And at second glance?

[@chris_eschner]

Pierre T. Lambert at second glance it was easier especially with pics of more depth of field. Other than that, computational photography can be eye to eye with real cameras especially with wide lenses in the future

[@Quoutub]

Why shocking? You could get theoretically the same result with nearly all(!) phones/cameras that can shoot in raw. In good light conditions without a high dynamic range of the scene the noise is mostly random, therefore even the raw files of small cameras without any computational photography wouldn't look noisy if you don't pixel peep. Therefore you can get the same look when you edit the photos. Sensor size has basically no effect on the "look", it depends mainly on image processing.