16^^3 = 16^(16^16) tetration is also written with a double up arrow.
@jaybazu5 ай бұрын
Brilliant spirit will always encounter opposition from mediocre spirits... That is so far established.. Bro you look like a bass player I know but bass players aren't stupid incapable of understanding math... Whatever you look like you are great and you know that stuff... Keep teaching us
@michaelz22705 ай бұрын
Another way of looking at it: You want log_2(log_2(16^16^16)). First logarithm log_2(16^16^16) equals 16^16 log_2(16) = 4 * 16^16. Second iterated logarithm gives log_2(4 * 16^16) = log_2 4 + log_2 16^16 = 2 + log_2 16^16 = 2 + 16 log_2 16 = 2 + 16*4 = 66.
@TavinTong-f8p2 ай бұрын
I agree with what he says…🎉
@CC--qn4gf5 ай бұрын
They thought evaluating a tetration from bottom to top made a big number, little did they know lol. Btw if anyone is interested I found a formula that you can use for just that; evaluating from bottom to top. Formula such that 'a' is equal to the base and 'n' is equal to the hyperpower: a^^n = a^(a^(n-1))
@X-SHOTA5 ай бұрын
Hi there ! I have got a problem for you can you please make a video solving it ? the problem is : prove that for all strictly positive reel numbers a and b : (2ab) / (a+b) + sqrt( (a² + b²) / 2 ) >= (a + b) / 2 + sqrt(ab)
@PrimeNewtons5 ай бұрын
You're the second person to recommend this problem. I'll work on it .
@Sigma.Infinity4 ай бұрын
Looks like the AM/GM and or Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality methods may be useful.
Tetration is associative only on the right, but not on the left.
@V-The_Present5 ай бұрын
This is actually teached in f.2
@xinpingdonohoe39785 ай бұрын
And what is f.2?
@V-The_Present5 ай бұрын
@@xinpingdonohoe3978 grade 8
@_Heb_5 ай бұрын
@@xinpingdonohoe3978Whatever it is, they don't teach English grammar in it
@robertveith63835 ай бұрын
* *taught*
@V-The_Present5 ай бұрын
@@robertveith6383 ok ty
@pojuantsalo34755 ай бұрын
Interestingly I got completely different answer: 16^16^16 = (2^4)^16^16 = (2^2^2)^16^16 = 2^2^(2*16^16) ==> x = 2*16^16 = 2*2^64 = 2^65. Not sure where this goes wrong. It is so easy to make a mistake with these exponent towers and it doesn't help the size of these numbers is beyond comprehension.
@numero171715 ай бұрын
I belive the mistake happens after the third "=", you shoud have done (2^2)*(16^16) instead of 2^(2*16^16)
@pojuantsalo34755 ай бұрын
@@numero17171 Yeah, I got this now. Thanks!
@epd8075 ай бұрын
Excellent video! Thank you 🙏 Perfect penmanship as usual!!
@SaddikMansoori-oo1pf4 ай бұрын
Sir there are two defferent answer
@ScienceEnFolie-w1g5 ай бұрын
Bro I thought it would be something with natural log super complex...