QUANTUM Computer DESTROYS Top Bot on CHESS.COM | Mate in 178 Moves!

Chess.com's max level 25 computer opponent is no match for the quantum computing power of QuantumFish, which has completely solved the game of chess! Witness the utter destruction of a chess bot that no human has a prayer of beating!

[@ian_and_michelle_5680]

QuantumFish strikes again!

[@smashu2]

How can you prove or demonstrate it is mate in 178 ?

[@neyxiumyt3893]

it's probably because it goes through all the good moves from both players

[@squareonechess6939]

I cannot, I must simply trust QuantumFish, but perhaps I I can persuade QuantumFish to demonstrate the optimum defense in addition to the moves played in the game, in a future video.

[@neyxiumyt3893]

@@squareonechess6939 can you show some kind of bar like stockfish showing who's winning and mate in how much it is

[@taee1938]

biggest troll

[@firiasu]

This is too easy for you.

[@sanjaykamath90210]

How do you simulate a quantum computer ? 😮

[@smashu2]

Ok I have a challenge for you play quantum fish vs tcec fish to prove your not a scam i am in contact with tcec I can arrange that.

[@squareonechess6939]

Thank you, I will pass on your challenge to QuantumFish :)

[@srinivasaba7004]

Quantum fish I want to see you play against GOD as stockfish played against ....... Please I am not able to last long thinking about it...!!!!

[@squareonechess6939]

That's a great idea, I will pass on your suggestion to QuantumFish

[@srinivasaba7004]

@@squareonechess6939 hurrah finally I got a response by a master chess 🖥...

[@user-uy1vh7hc8x]

There are no quantum computers that can do serious stuff yet. The technology is still in its infancy and the only problems that can be solved by quantum computing are really simple ones. Although quantum computing is an evolving research field, playing good chess due to quantum computing won't be possible anytime soon. Thus this video is a pure scam, probably generated by letting a good conventional chess engine play against another.

[@squareonechess6939]

Would you call The Blair Witch Project a scam?

[@a314ian]

How much of this is opening theory?

[@squareonechess6939]

4...d6 was a bit unusual but the first major deviation from the main line was 6...Be7, 6...g6 or a knight move is much more common

[@smashu2]

According too my fish black make multiple opening inaccuracy...

[@smashu2]

How much real or scam is this quantum fish ?? My fish see Nxf2 is losing but mate in 178 ?? how accurate is that ?

[@shadowofheaven3279]

I'm pretty sure it's a joke or a scam. The amount of possible moves would require possibly the strongest computer that has ever existed

[@namitchugh5965]

still you cant beat magnus 💀