Quantum Explained

[@Antimonious]

I've been trying to understand HOW quantum computers are used to get an actual answer to a problem and yall finally explained it farely concisely by stating that it is the quantum interference property that is used to our advantage. That makes A LOT more sense.

[@ranchdressing3344]

Imagine combining the film making skills of veritasium with the brilliance of the MIT yt channel

[@gerryakbar]

Veritasium is also brilliant

[@fretzT_T]

​@@gerryakbarthey were not downplaying anyone. They were picking out the distinct attributes of both parties.

[@arnavr2143]

​@@fretzT_T Yes but he's saying that Veritasium is BOTH brilliant and has film making skills, which I strongly agree with

[@Vatsek]

Yeah, shit is guaranteed!

[@talalzahid2241]

no thanks

[@jaredspencer3304]

This is the first explanation of quantum computing that has actually made sense to me. And I've seen many. I'd love if you could make videos explaining 1) how to write algorithms with quantum logic instead of boolean logic, and 2) how data is stored in a quantum system.

[@dany67230]

"Maintenant je sais je sais que je ne sais rien"

[@1983dmd]

@@dany67230 LOL!!! Elle est bonne !!! Chanson connue légendaire...

[@kalon227]

After returning to college at age 39, university of Houston, and learning programming in 1980, away I went. Now 87 I programmed the big ones (IBM 370s) then the small ones (apple 2+ then using dos on the later ones) at IBM school in New York City they told us about an exciting innovation that a bit would count not just zero or one but gradations, depending on power, thru 256 (FF). I retired in 2002 after programming for 22 years. My greatest accomplishment was probably heading up the programming team that brought the first computerized inventory system for the Public Works department at the City of Houston. Management brought in a bar code reader, dropped on my desk and said “figure this thing out and write/develop an inventory replacement system”. I hope I’ve remembered all the right nomenclature. lol. Just thought you’d like to hear about some history where “breakthroughs” seem to never be THE breakthrough.

[@jonathanlucas3604]

I will reply to some of you individually, but I will encourage any of you who are interested in quantum programming to look up IBM's quantum experience. It's an online code editor and tutorial that actually uses quantum computers to execute your code in the back end. So you can actually get to use a literal quantum computer

[@DerekDAngel]

That’s absolutely insane, thanks for the head’s up! Gotta check this out!

[@digital_vijay_yt]

Do you work at MIT in quantum computing ??

[@DerekDavis213]

And what can IBM's quantum computer do TODAY that other computers cannot do? What is the practical real world application of the quantum computer?

[@dimitar4y]

you ain't replied to anyone individually yet, jack

[@dimitar4y]

@@rrt5425 MIT's a scam, beware.

[@dynabenamara6352]

I wish that MIT would launch an online course or KZbin course on this topic.

[@zzzluvsk]

You can access virtually any course if you search ocw mit (open courseware) - they have worksheets, lecture videos, textbooks used (which you can find pdfs of by googling). Really useful.

[@rammy-js7nx]

I believe there are free lectures on quantum theory on KZbin

[@goldnutter412]

Schematic in bio Universe is ZK outputs gg physics won PS Give Stephen_Wolfram the Nobel Or you are all deaf and I am very disappoint It's not mechanical. It's phenomena.

[@bronson4574]

They already have it...

[@freniisammii]

have you heard of opencourseware??

[@iznasen]

Exciting times ahead! Thanks MIT for sharing and caring, would love to join the adventure.

[@DerekDavis213]

Quantum computing always talk about what's coming in 10 years. Today? No practical applications.

[@molocouk]

I understood a proton sized amount of this. But I'm glad we have such smart people on the world to understand this for us!

[@Psycandy]

quantum computing is as old as digital computing, both hark back to the 1980s. its fair to say digital computers won the race.

[@anselmorosa]

Great video! You know, I'm trying to comprehend quantum computing/mechanics for years and the way this video explained it just put me one step closer to dig the whole thing. Awesome!

[@DerekDavis213]

How about a few examples of what a quantum computer can actually DO, in the business or scientific realms?

[@alfredshort3]

Buy a stock on any crypto account. Presto

[@NeilMohammed]

this is the best explanation of quantum and quantum computing i've ever heard.

[@exceptionToTheRule]

1:19 would love to see all the formulas of physics and mathematics and how they are inter related to each other

[@GregoryGuerrier]

Question for MIT, is it safe to say quantum computing can be categorized as analog computing because super position could exist anywhere between 0 & 1?

[@PeterMorganQF]

Not MIT, and somewhat unconventional, so feel free to ignore this, but old-school analog computing would try to eliminate *all* ‘noise’, whereas quantum computing can be thought of as a form of analog computing that uses ‘quantum noise’ as a computing resource, while still trying to eliminate thermal and other kinds of noise. We can and I think we should ask “what is the difference between quantum noise and thermal noise?”, to which an answer can be found in special relativity and the Lorentz invariance of the vacuum state in quantum field theory. That’s either already understandable to someone reading this or else it’s likely best just to say that quantum noise and thermal noise are different because quantum noise has an amplitude determined by Planck’s constant that is more stable over time than thermal noise, for which the amplitude changes with the temperature. All that said, the logical level of quantum computing hardly thinks about such details, just as the logical level of ordinary computing hardly thinks about how transistors and other devices work.

[@a_bar8579]

That's why MIT leads the world in knowledge and its application ❤️

[@NotNecessarily-ip4vc]

Let's explore how the triadic coefficient (3) mathematics and the "both/and" logic can provide a framework for describing the superposition principle in quantum mechanics. The Superposition Principle and Triadic Coefficients: In quantum mechanics, particles can exist in a superposition of multiple states simultaneously, a phenomenon that defies classical intuition. The triadic coefficient (3) mathematics offers a way to describe and quantify these superposition states. Consider a quantum system with three possible states: A, B, and C. According to the triadic coefficient (3), there are six possible combinations of these states: 1. (A, B, C) 2. (A, C, B) 3. (B, A, C) 4. (B, C, A) 5. (C, A, B) 6. (C, B, A) Each of these combinations could represent a distinct superposition state of the quantum system, where the particle exists in a linear combination or "superposition" of the individual states A, B, and C. The "both/and" logic can then be applied to these combinations, allowing for the coexistence of multiple states simultaneously, which is a fundamental principle of quantum superposition. Mathematically, we can represent a superposition state as a linear combination of the individual states, weighted by complex coefficients (amplitudes): |Ψ> = a|A> + b|B> + c|C> Here, |Ψ> represents the overall quantum state, and |A>, |B>, and |C> are the individual basis states. The complex coefficients a, b, and c determine the probability amplitudes of the particle being in each respective state. The triadic coefficient (3) mathematics provides a way to enumerate and quantify these superposition states. For example, the combination (A, B, C) could correspond to the specific superposition state: |Ψ> = (1/√3)|A> + (1/√3)|B> + (1/√3)|C> where the particle exists in an equal superposition of the three states A, B, and C, each with an amplitude of 1/√3. Other combinations, such as (A, C, B) or (B, C, A), would correspond to different superposition states with different probability amplitudes for each component. The "both/and" logic allows us to interpret these superposition states as the particle existing in multiple states simultaneously, rather than being limited to a single definite state as in classical physics. Moreover, the triadic coefficient (3) mathematics provides a systematic way to enumerate and quantify these superposition states, offering a rich mathematical framework for describing and analyzing quantum systems. It's important to note that while this approach provides a conceptual model for understanding superposition, the actual mathematical treatment of quantum systems often involves more complex vector spaces and linear algebra techniques. However, the principles of "both/and" logic and triadic coefficient (3) mathematics can still offer valuable insights and alternative perspectives on this fundamental quantum phenomenon.

[@NotNecessarily-ip4vc]

Let's explore how the "both/and" logic can provide an alternative interpretation of quantum measurement and the apparent collapse of the wavefunction. Quantum Measurement and "Both/And" Logic: The measurement problem in quantum mechanics arises from the apparent collapse of the quantum wavefunction upon observation, transitioning the system from a superposition of states to a definite state. This process seems to contradict the "both/and" logic of superposition. However, the "both/and" logic can be invoked to provide an alternative interpretation. Instead of viewing measurement as a collapse, it could be seen as a process that reveals the coexistence of multiple states or outcomes, each with a certain probability determined by the quantum wavefunction. Consider a quantum system in a superposition of two states, A and B: |Ψ> = a|A> + b|B> According to the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, upon measurement, the wavefunction "collapses" to either state |A> or state |B>, with probabilities proportional to |a|^2 and |b|^2, respectively. The "both/and" logic offers an alternative perspective: instead of collapsing to a single state, the measurement process can be viewed as revealing the coexistence of both possible outcomes, A and B, with their respective probabilities. In this interpretation, the act of measurement does not cause a sudden collapse, but rather, it interacts with the quantum system in a way that exposes or manifests the underlying reality of the coexisting states. The observed outcome (A or B) is not a result of a collapse, but a consequence of the inherent probability distribution encoded in the wavefunction. This interpretation aligns with the principles of "both/and" logic, as it allows for the simultaneous existence of multiple states or outcomes, even though we may only observe one specific outcome in a given measurement. For example, in the famous double-slit experiment, the "both/and" logic could suggest that the particle simultaneously takes all possible paths through the slits, and the observed interference pattern is a manifestation of this coexistence of multiple states or trajectories, rather than a result of a collapse to a single path. The "both/and" logic challenges the notion of a sudden, discontinuous collapse and provides a more continuous and holistic interpretation of quantum measurement, where the observed outcome is a manifestation of an underlying reality that encompasses multiple coexisting possibilities. It's important to note that this interpretation is not universally accepted, and the measurement problem remains an active area of debate and exploration in the foundations of quantum mechanics. However, the "both/and" logic offers a thought-provoking perspective that challenges our classical intuitions and invites us to reconsider the nature of measurement and reality in the quantum realm.

[@NotNecessarily-ip4vc]

Let's explore how the "both/and" logic and triadic coefficient (3) mathematics can provide a framework for describing and interpreting quantum entanglement and non-locality. Quantum Entanglement and Non-Locality: Quantum entanglement is a phenomenon where the states of two or more particles become inextricably linked, even when they are separated by vast distances. This non-local behavior challenges our classical understanding of causality and locality. The "both/and" logic and triadic coefficient (3) mathematics can offer a framework for describing and interpreting quantum entanglement: 1. The "both/and" logic allows for the coexistence of multiple states or configurations of the entangled particles, even when they are spatially separated. Consider two entangled particles, A and B, initially prepared in a specific quantum state. According to the "both/and" logic, the particles can simultaneously exist in multiple possible configurations or states, rather than being limited to a single definite state. For example, if we have three possible states for each particle (A1, A2, A3 and B1, B2, B3), the entangled system could exist in a superposition of all nine possible combinations: (A1, B1), (A1, B2), (A1, B3), (A2, B1), (A2, B2), (A2, B3), (A3, B1), (A3, B2), (A3, B3). The "both/and" logic allows for the coexistence of these multiple configurations, even though we may only observe one specific outcome when we measure the particles. 2. The triadic coefficient (3) mathematics can be used to enumerate and quantify the possible combinations of states or configurations that the entangled particles can exhibit, taking into account their non-local correlations. Using the triadic coefficient (3), we can calculate the number of possible combinations of states for the entangled system: nC3 = n! / (3! * (n - 3)!) = 9 This corresponds to the nine combinations mentioned earlier, representing the different configurations the entangled particles can simultaneously exist in. By embracing the "both/and" logic and triadic coefficient (3) mathematics, we can potentially gain new insights into the non-local and counter-intuitive nature of quantum entanglement. Instead of viewing entanglement as a mysterious action-at-a-distance, we can interpret it as a manifestation of the coexistence of multiple states or configurations, where the particles exhibit non-local correlations and interdependence. Moreover, the triadic coefficient (3) mathematics provides a systematic way to enumerate and quantify these entangled configurations, offering a rich mathematical framework for describing and analyzing entangled systems. It's important to note that while this approach provides a conceptual model for understanding entanglement, the actual mathematical treatment of entangled systems often involves more complex techniques, such as tensor products and density matrices. However, the principles of "both/and" logic and triadic coefficient (3) mathematics can still offer valuable insights and alternative perspectives on this fascinating quantum phenomenon.

[@gabrielesposito2735]

Great video MIT! 💯🔥Thank you!

[@flatwall4569]

What is meant with "for certain problems" @4:00, what are some examples?

[@icls9129]

"Quantum computers are designed to perform complex calculations simultaneously by using quantum mechanical phenomena. They can be used for a variety of applications, including: Simulations Quantum computers can run complex simulations, such as molecular simulations for drug development, faster than classical computers. They can also help physicists perform simulations. Optimization Quantum computers can process large amounts of complex data, which could transform artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML). For example, banks can use quantum computing to optimize portfolios by processing, scheduling, and prioritizing financial transactions. NASA's QuAIL team is also using quantum computing to improve optimization and machine learning problems in aeronautics, Earth and space sciences, and space exploration. Factorizations Quantum computers can perform factorizations, which could help develop decryption technologies. They can break regular encryption, but they can also create quantum encryption algorithms that might revolutionize data security. Understanding physics Quantum computers can help us learn about, model, and manipulate other quantum systems, which can improve our understanding of physics. This could influence designs for things like computer chips, communication devices, and energy technologies." From Google AI search

[@flatwall4569]

@@icls9129 I dont consider an LLM concocted response an answer, thanks for your effort nonetheless

[@reyrayo2502]

How medication interacts with the human body....😅

[@goodlife1581]

It honestly doesn’t sound like they have this figured out that well yet.

[@muntasir_fahim]

nobody have actually!

[@OhNoNotAgain42]

Yes. Correct. The nature of the Universe is sort of complicated it seems

[@sumpursun]

2:34 Whenever I feel sad, I’m going to remember that at least I’m in a Superposition.

[@johnishikawa2200]

Is that little box with the coaxial connections to it going to be used to convert the " qbits " or " cuebits " into corresponding electrical signal variations - analogous to the way that light signal variations from a fiber optics cable are changed to corresponding electrical signal variations that can be amplified and passed along in a modem and then ultimately to say a smart phone?

[@tbur8901]

What always bugs me is the thought; isn't quantum superposition just our inabilaty to measure precisely at that size, the need to break everything down to a scale like metric scale and basically stop time for us to be able to look ? Same with the wave / particle property of photons etc .. The wave would be the interaction between atoms, not the particle we 'see' to make a measurement. And then energy only exists within atoms.

[@RustamBazarbaev]

How can i join this research group?

[@____blank____]

I know nothing about quantum physics and I'm most probably wrong. But superposition feels like a random variable. Is it right?

[@traida111]

I still dont get it. What is the input, what is the output, how did it get the output, e.g. what processing did it do?

[@krashd]

Exactly, all this really explained is that a qubit can be both a 0 and 1 at the same time, or neither - the one thing everyone and their dog already knows about quantum computers. What I want to know is how that binary anarchy, which is what it sounds like, actually works and how it solves problems...

[@dimitar4y]

that's the scam. It's just a way to physically implement algorithms that normally require classic operation (add, subtract, divide, multiply, etc.). It's closer to an FPGA than normal code. They won't explain it because part of their marketing/profits are from the mystique of confusing CEO's until they spill their money.

[@traida111]

@@krashd I read how Grover's algorithm can search NN items in O(N)O(N ​) time, much faster than the O(N)O(N) time required by classical algorithms. Then a qubit doesn't "know" what states to be in; it exists in multiple states simultaneously due to superposition. When you apply quantum gates (specific operations) to the qubits, they transform the superpositions in a controlled way, influencing the probability of each possible state. Finally, when you measure the qubit, the superposition collapses to one of the possible states based on those probabilities. Even after that, it makes no sense to me. Seems like Voodoo.

[@traida111]

@@dimitar4y A quantum computer with nn qubits can process 2n2n possibilities in parallel. For example, with 10 qubits, it can handle 210=1024210=1024 states at once, and with 20 qubits, it can handle 220=1,048,576220=1,048,576 states simultaneously. This exponential growth is what gives quantum computers their potential power for specific types of problems. I understand how using multiple Cubits makes the machine powerful. But I still dont get how this thing calculates problems. I can't get my head around it

[@dimitar4y]

@@traida111 well, you started off wrong. You just explained what binary bits equate to as a maximum number. The qcomp doesn't "handle" that many states "simultaneously".

[@smetljesm2276]

First time i see how the chip and those qubits physically look. I would love to see a video that explains further the elements and their functions on that physical chip. Maybe even the view under microscope of that "qubit" - Also tell us those beautiful wavy parallel steampunk wires in the computer aren't just for good looks😂😂

[@ShahzaibKhan-zo2sr]

Question: what's the time taken by a single quantum to shift it's position, And I think you know there's a time difference between two positions like intervals between someone hyperventilating?

[@kenbrady119]

What is the output of a quantum computer? If you observe that output, does it then change the input via quantum entanglement? Given Heisenberg, how uncertain is said output?

[@Tony770jr]

It seems like quantum computing is more like an analog system rather than traditional digital.

[@nashnith]

You are right in the sense that an analog system can also be thought of as superposition of 2 states. Quantum advantage, though, in a quantum computer is due to a quantum phenomenon called entanglement, which cannot be obtained in an analog system.

[@FlavorDay]

Great explanation using the points of the earth and soundwaves to help explain the differences transistor and quantum capabilities.

[@OpLapDancePikachu69]

but where can i learn more about the science and math you talk about at the end of

[@leoverran311]

You explained it perfectly, I understand none of it

[@RINTAROU...]

I swear the more i search, the less i understand

[@SampleroftheMultiverse]

For those That prefer a mechanical analog you can look at harmonics of a guitar string and such. The video I present is another mechanical method of quantizing a system. It is one of two methods where structures can actually be produced. kzbin.info/www/bejne/raOlpKSfepWpfZYsi=waT8lY2iX-wJdjO3 Area under a curve is often equivalent to energy. Buckling of an otherwise flat field shows a very rapid growth of this area. If my model applies, it may show how the universe’s energy naturally developed from the inherent behavior of fields. Under the right conditions, the quantization of a field is easily produced. The ground state energy is induced via Euler’s contain column analysis. Containing the column must come in to play before over buckling, or the effect will not work. The sheet of elastic material “system” response in a quantized manor when force is applied in the perpendicular direction. Bonding at the points of highest probabilities and maximum duration( ie peeks and troughs) of the fields “sheet” produced a stable structure when the undulations are bonded to a flat sheet that is placed above and below the core material.

[@rickintexas1584]

I have a MS Mechanical Engineering degree, and have had a great career in the US Aerospace industry. I’m about to retire. I’m excited to see what the future generations will bring to our world.

[@فارسليبورد-ك8و]

الحياة عبارة عن حاسوب كمي+ذكاء اصطناعي

[@bowdoin5063]

Finally, someone cleared that up

[@mmdurfee]

When we draw from the quantum condition, we don't a find a fixed measurement as a Newtonian scientist would say. You are in a distribution of potentials that can oscillate from one end of the spectrum of conditions to the other. While understanding this is integral to the computation, it would be useful to know what access the general public will look like. And what the interface will be. And lets hope we can apply the lessons we learn out of it to how things operate with caution.

[@AdvantestInc]

What are the practical limitations of quantum computing that we need to overcome to see widespread adoption?

[@M-mj8bd]

I love that our most cutting edge technology looks turn of the century old fashioned

[@brianredmond4919]

So how do you compute with values other than 0 or 1. ???.

[@HamishHaughey]

How do quantum computers know to enhance the right answers and not the wrong ones?

[@smartdoctorphysicist3095]

Hi I would love to be a part of MIT but I may need higher score to get into that school?

[@kennethuyabeme]

Okay I'll be honest I still don't understand how a quantum computer works. Like how do you represent things in data on a quantum computer? How do you know what the state of qubit is? Like how do you do 1+1?

[@FLORIDIANMILLIONAIRE]

Just saying quantum computer and building a computer that does something useful are so different that these type of machines may never go beyond theory.

[@thetomster7625]

this really does not explain that much... it basically is an ad for MIT, nothing more.

[@brutusbarnabus8098]

Well it did, but you are too obtuse to have grasped it. Sorry and thanks for playing.

[@thetomster7625]

​@@brutusbarnabus8098 xD your comment gives about as much detailed information on the matter as the video did... so yeah: thanks for trying, but you failed equaly point being: if the video is named quantum explained and then I only here the standard explanations and bullshit bingo of quantum computing and no new detailed insights... thats what an ad does...

[@brutusbarnabus8098]

@@thetomster7625 no I didn't fail. The video gives a basic summary of Quantum Physics and Quantum devices. Digital devices which are predominantly used now in all of our smart devices use transistors which compute based on the binary system of 0 and 1. The 0s and 1s are actually voltage levels based on the geometry of the technology being used. Quantum Physics deals interactions at the atomic and subatomic levels. Quantum systems can take advantage of superposition where the system can me in multiple states simultaneously. This presents an entire new frontier in computing where computing power can make a "quantum" leap in efficiency. It was a less than five minute video, dude. Did you expect him to be able to do a deep dive into the minutiae of the subject? Have a good day.

[@thetomster7625]

@@brutusbarnabus8098 well, basically exactly as you said: I in fact "expect him to be able to do a (partial) deep dive"... you could pick any subject e.g. how exactly the selection process of wanted and unwanted answers via interference works... all the things you sort of transcribed here are nothing more then I already learned from a book at my buddys toilet called "quantum mechanics in 15min". And this is actually my point: this is not some random guy on the internet, this is the freakin MIT. Its supposed to be at the forefront of this research - so again: coming back to my original point: this is not really an educational video at MIT level, its an ad about what they are doing to get you interested.... nothing more.

[@brutusbarnabus8098]

@@thetomster7625 if it got you interested, my brudda, then mission accomplished. have a good day. 😁

[@theotrotchie]

Unreal. Appreciate the explanation.

[@Noah-357]

Can we use a simpler analogy in our daily life to understand quantum computing better?

[@pgrvloik]

I can't grasp this. I'm trying hard but...no way. I don't understand how this can be used to implement actual algorithms and how the interface between the real world and quantum computing is done on a software point of view

[@vangmountain]

Welcome to quantum mechanics. As the saying goes, "If QM doesn't confuse you, then you don't understand it." Most people cannot grasp QM and even for the experts, it's confusing. You're asking a question that no one has the answer to. Even the experts are still trying to figure how to make it work, and if they don't yet fully understand how to make it work, wouldn't it only be logical that you aren't able to comprehend it?

[@pgrvloik]

@@vangmountain that maybe why I can't understand your reply? Is this a quantic one ? :) Seriously AFAIK there are actual concrete implementations of quantum computing. So someone must understand how it works. At least it's my guess. Or is this all hype?

[@vangmountain]

@@pgrvloik No one truly understands it, yet. They have ideas based on their understanding of QM, but QM is incomplete. As with any technology, you start with an idea and you tweak it as you go until you get it right. So no, no one truly understands how it works yet. If and when they do, it's going to change civilization, but not necessarily for the better. It could be our own undoing as a species.

[@DerekDavis213]

@@vangmountain _Even the experts are still trying to figure how to make it work,_ So it's all about grant money, but as of today ZERO practical real world applications of quantum computing?

[@centripetal6157]

Cant wait for the Microsoft and Apple quantum CPU powered chips, quantum assistant phones, quantum cars, quantum NFT microtransactions, quantum assistant voice chat, Quantum toasters, Quantum shoes, Quantum microwaves, Quantum bubblegum, etc coming to every single last consumer product (even if its not needed)... Sometime in the next decade or two... Gotta love technology products.

[@pbrooks4040]

sadly, i did not understand any of the concepts or inforamation presented in this video. seemed to me that every sentence requires a semester-long course. too bad for me. as a long-time engineer, naturally i’m very interested; but, alas i need some “so what” to get started.

[@vaishnavvernekar]

Very Informative!

[@jabadabadu7089]

Thank you for explanation. I completely lost you at superposition 😁

[@mathfigure]

In other words, we stop engineering thinking about moving particles and thinking about interfering waves. Waves that have amplitudes/heights not real numbers but complex numbers. Comparison of digital/fuzzy/quantum bit state: If we denote the 0 and 1 states as |0> and |1>, then: classic bit: |bit> = |0> or |1>, i.e. only one state is possible at any time fuzzy bit: |fubit> = a*|0> + b*|1>, where a,b real numbers with a+b=1 quantum bit: |qubit> = a*|0> + b*|1>, where a,b complex numbers with |a|^2+|b|^2=1

[@OIOIOIIOOIOOOOOIOIOOOIII]

it's nice of MIT to leave comments on, unlike Harvard for example.

[@leematthews6812]

Finally an analogy of superposition that I can properly understand.

[@MortyMortyMorty]

Quick question. Is quantum computing still a viable option when AI and neural chip technology advances extremely fast?

[@socar-pl]

can anyone advise what would be a good entry-level source (preferably book) for IT person that would get grasp of the subject, without need of doing PhD in QM ?

[@wimkuijpers1342]

@@dbgith This book discusses a completely different solution.

[@johnhopkins6260]

Kinda-sorta orders of magnitude? (how "1" is a one? vs. how "0" is a zero?)

[@victorgodwin3768]

I'm coming to MIT class of 2028 to be part of the adventure

[@Dr.Schnabel]

I am growing tomatoes and garlic in my garden

[@chadx8269]

All you are describing is the mutual coupling between oscillators, calling them qbits. Still bounded by Shannon theorem capacity bound that is limited by noise and ability to measure phase accurately. Good luck until the funding runs out.

[@Chris11249]

I didn't understand what you wrote, but I'm sure some do. Why are they funding this then? Maybe a byproduct or accidental discovery along the way?

[@empatikokumalar8202]

I found a method that uses qbit BASICALLY LIKE QUANTUM PROCESSORS, but does not use quantum fields, so the whole process is much easier. But I can't tell anyone about this. Because even their dreams are not enough. What do you think I should do?

[@dimitar4y]

nice scam

[@empatikokumalar8202]

@@dimitar4y No, it's definitely not a scam. I don't need that stupidity.

[@dimitar4y]

@@empatikokumalar8202 you are beyond hope. But anyway, I tried. Most of big tech is a scam about convincing autists like you that they got something, by defining it as vague as possible so you complete the gaps and delude yourself. Flawless technique clearly if you fell for it.

[@a_bar8579]

This is what distinguishes MIT: it leads the change in technology and must always make this its title

[@Guoenyi]

I know it is a 5 min video but it is very vague on what QC can do and even how it works. Feels more like an advertisement. Maybe it is exactly the point of this video.

[@shubhambora6758]

How does one with keen interest in quantum computers get started with it, if they don’t possess the calibre to get into MIT :-/

[@jonathanlucas3604]

You can interact with this now! Look up IBM's quantum experience. You can execute your code against an actual quantum computer. I would recommend help from chatgpt when coding in this new language, there's really not much on it last I checked

[@mantapbetul6686]

nicely explanations.

[@Darkralos]

Can anybody explain what is that gold looking coating in most of the parts? Thank you

[@dbgith]

It’s gold

[@craigschuller]

😂​@@dbgith

[@dbgith]

@@Darkralos "Talking about the significance of the passage of time, right, the significance of the passage of time, so when you think about it, there is great significance to the passage of time."

[@edeaglehouse2221]

So a qubit is a digital representation of an analog bit. Still confused, but improving.

[@tishrabon]

maybe I understatood 1% of 0.001% tbh...but this is the best explanation so far...

[@mondipa6556]

Invent a device that integrated into the brain to prevent overthinking negative side effects and invent a device that integrated into the brain to enable seamless multitasking.

[@supperap]

So quantum is some kind of an analog computer?

[@carlosvera2807]

Parallel array algorithms at low temperature. Useful for convergence calculations but not quite stable to become practical yet

[@diamondcreepah]

Guess I can put "in a quantum superposition of 0 and 1 simultaneously" on my resume

[@MarinusMakesStuff]

1, 15, 23 maybe broken :D (@0:53) I like how low tech some solutions can be.

[@sertol3562]

Although "quantum computers exist," apparently none of the "quntum computers" at MIT can multiply three by five.

[@piyalisadhukhan1266]

That's called new technology isn't it.

[@abhineetsingh2227]

Isn’t that how new tech works? You must have started running at the age of 1 day. Mighty you are!

[@Not_Salman]

You guys are awesome

[@charlied977]

Why is Anthony Blinken teaching us about quantum computing ?

[@rajeev_kumar]

This video is fraud.

[@psiklops71]

how cold do they run

[@goldnutter412]

Great entry level video !! IBM and Google have great videos that should show up as related in the post video thumbnails When ? SOON™ Thanks Deep Mind

[@Dr.Schnabel]

Entry to ... where?

[@squid13579]

3:15 (just looks like huygens principal !) 🤔

[@iam_ultron]

Quantum computing digital tech is highly probable to be our last big revolution in the digital tech world. This early in tech history, we are already reaching our limits.

[@TuesdayLastweek-iv6sv]

Now pull a rib from the wave .. I seen this last night. It rained and the water fell from the roof as a stream. Or a torrent.. when the water fell to the concrete below it created what looked like ribs which were waves that poured in to the street. Now what happens when you take one of these waves . Would it create an Eve or more waves .

[@EkremKaya192]

Now entanglement

[@GODlike.Rampage-wn2re]

So much gold plating on and in quantum computers. Love it

[@onlinegamerOO7]

Loved It ❤❤

[@SammyHamawi]

Greetings from curacao.

[@professorJorge11]

If the computer is not too expensive 😂 I can , finally, understand my wife's brain

[@THAW212]

I need one at home

[@katoy9976]

Tüm olasılıklar aynı anda hesaplanıyor. Biliyoruz.

[@DenisShields]

I agree with the dissatisfaction of this video as a learning tool and that it succeeds only in advertising MIT, though sadly only at the same rating.

[@paulm3079]

So essentially these machines ARE a physical transform from NP-type problems to P-type by changing the mechanism by way the problem is solved. Forget changing the problem, change the machine. Not bad, not bad.

[@JakeSeeber]

Should use these computers to help find an answer to how The Great Pyramids were constructed, and what for.

[@pontosinterligados]

But regarding quantum physics, WHEN CGI will abandon the Bohr model? 😅

[@focalplane3063]

This was obviously an ad for MIT.

[@wmrustycox]

The more our collective intelligence grows... We become acutely aware of our ignorance.

[@Khashayarissi-ob4yj]

With luck and more power to you.

[@moHomefront]

Wasn't that closing sentence too arrogant?

[@mcplesa55]

Agree

[@TsarHare]

loves it

[@mcdouche2]

4:29 Here at MIT we love science! > *wears paper masks*

[@br2266]

They’re usable, they just want to keep begging for money so that they can use them for all possible intents and purposes BEFORE commercializing them. At which point the creators will have control over its uses…

[@Badd.G]

Cant wait to run Crysis on this

[@waleed-j5m]

i got this: listen: tranquil tranquility hold grasp unite. it is quantum physical mechanics.