Ranking Battlefield 5 Maps from WORST to BEST!

[@ink4852]

I don't really think it's fair to just give every map an overall rating. I feel some maps work better for certain modes. For example I LOATHE Hamada on Conquest, but I really like it on Squad Conquest.

[@wickedwu22]

Agree

[@Ultimate_Silicium]

That was exactly what I was thinking. Very good indeed in Squad Conquest and unbearable in Conquest

[@jacksonsteele3403]

I think hamada needs more tanks tbh it's just a big map but not enough tanks or planes

[@ryanmcadams1737]

Well said totally agree

[@radzio40k]

100% agree, best map for sq cq, worst for standard conquest

[@Q__tube]

Most of it really depends on what game mode your playing on said map

[@Westie]

Assume you're playing Conquest.

[@somethingyouhave]

Westie why would we assume I’m doing a silly thing like that? 😉 No coordination between squads leads to too much zerging. I stick with TDM mostly as a result. And some maps, like Hamada are great for TDM, but not as much for Conquest.

[@yogamoshi567]

We all know that Breakthrough is the best map mode.

[@Q__tube]

Acled Maiden that aoukd be true if Frontlines didnt exist

[@benjaminmoszkowicz8149]

Westie I don’t like conquest its just running from A to B and then to A again etc. etc. Operations (BF1-style) is the best along with frontlines (BF1-style) it has immersion and a feeling of defending your territory, truly what Battlefield is about....

[@giglefreakz]

I think Hamada’s temple section is absolutely brilliant. Playing Squad Conquest on that map is in my opinion the most fun you can have in this game.

[@somethingyouhave]

Squad Conquest and TDM play similarly on that map. I like them both there.

[@danielherz8808]

Agree!

[@arianas0714]

I like it on breaktrough too

[@crisgamesomg7418]

I agree

[@Bullitt1768]

@@arianas0714 Agree, it starts getting fun when you get to the first ruin structure(if you're attacking).

[@lossguette1669]

I just need a Fort de Vaux "remake", inside the caves of Iwo Jima or Peleliu. Wouldn't that be gorgeous 😍

[@mdll1919]

I would love that!

[@PamParamPamPam55]

>Fort de Vaux "remake" No. No. God damn no.

[@lossguette1669]

@@PamParamPamPam55 By remake, i mean some close quarters combat. A part of the map could be outside (I imagine a tropical jungle, with 1 or 2 flags on some strategic points, such as small trenches systems), and the major part would be a partially destroyed bunker, leading to the caves (which will have ofc multiple entry points across the map)

[@JustOnceMore123]

Lossguette So, inspired by Fort de Vaux rather than remake? Is that what you mean?

[@lossguette1669]

@@JustOnceMore123 That's what I meant yes.

[@kayukikaneko1819]

I think the problem is that non of the maps are big WW2 places. I do like some of the maps panzerstorm being my favourite however i believe we definitely need some big ww2 battle maps. I liked the idea of taking you on a journey through WW2 but i dont really fancy starting the journey in Norway and finishing somewhere in Austria, the next two maps to release again aren’t major battles and while i appreciate showing some lesser known battles in the war you cant have a WW2 game without D day, Stalingrad, Berlin ect. Now granted these years are yet to come to the game however i would have expected like a Dunkirk map or something by now.

[@madvilliany1692]

Kayuki Kaneko yeah where’s Dunkirk at! Rotterdam and Devastation aren’t even real battles!

[@rakias1982]

The crete map was the biggest airborne operation the germans ever did in ww2.the marita map is about the battle of greece vs italy in the pindos mountains the first defeat of axis forces in ww2.dice messed up the timeline though.the mountain campaign came first with the greek victory vs italy then operation mercury was the final battle of the later german invasion.ww2 was not only english and american battles.i like the fact that they covered the early history but i agree that we need the major battles too..stalingrad kursk guadalcanal midway iwo jima operation market garden d day bastogne and the siege of berlin MUST be in the game

[@godlyanteater7075]

Tbh the Canadians should have a faction like they liberated the Netherlands

[@seanpurdy8230]

Lord Lemon The Battle of Rotterdam was a real battle and the city looked exactly like Devastation after the air campaign. The only thing false is the British involvement.

[@rosaria8384]

Norway was pivotal for Germany, and was the signal of the beginning of WW2 in 1940. Tbh Norway isn't a bad choice, it's just the execution in game that matters. Several airborne operations, naval battles, and land battles in the fjords, Narvik, Oslo, and others were the selling point of Norway

[@ve6009]

Desert maps = Bad Snowy maps = Average Urban maps = Almost Good Forest/Field Maps = Pretty Good

[@nicolasnunez8388]

Vexir Bf1 was an exception tho. The desert map in the game will forever be my favorite battlefield map of all time. Period.

[@nicolasnunez8388]

Wafflez-Man- I know bruh. Just saying it’s different from game to game

[@andregal123]

Makes me remember how everyone hated Panzerstorm at first and later came as the best map after they patched it

[@supermatbg5427]

Idk why but I really hate snow maps in BF5 And I am slavic And kinda see snow everyday

[@narmilh2109]

@@nicolasnunez8388 bf1 Sinai desert is so fun. Especially when you go to C and B, where close quarters combat happen while the vast rest of map is for the train, planes, and the landships. I also love objective E, there are artillery cannons that I used whenever a landships would come from F. I agree with u

[@houseofarcade3123]

We need a Ardennes forest map. Fighting along the trees and maybe some smaller open areas. But I think the fights there took place post D-day. So let's hope for that in the future👍 And of course Guadalcanal when the pacific theater comes along

[@lasttemplar9070]

Thats the battle of the Bulge

[@catfishyt9925]

@Last Templar Yeah I think that would be cool because my grandpa fought in that battle

[@tater4462]

@@catfishyt9925 my grandpa fought in that battlefield as well

[@Damadiel-XB]

I doubt will get any of that sense battlefield is trying to show battles that arent as remembered as D-Day or things like that

[@houseofarcade3123]

@@Damadiel-XB Well, Old man. You were dead at the time of the second world War. Didn't John Marston kill you in like 1911?😂

[@Canaboid]

Twisted Steel: 8/10 Arras: 8/10 Rotterdam: 8/10 Panzerstorm: 7/10 Hamada: 6/10 Aerodrome: 6/10 Devastation: 6/10 Narvik: 4/10 Fjell 652: 1/10

[@qr-code6334]

I would switch Fjell and Panzerstorm

[@Canaboid]

I like to play as a sniper on Twisted Steel and kind of like it. Also it looks pretty. Fjell will always be last because i think its the worst Battlefield map i have ever seen. I hate it. Panzerstorm is not that bad if you like sniping or tanks.

[@JustAgreekPassing]

Fjell is really fun. It's much more fast-paced than the others & due to the layout, it feels like there's possibilities for assault, stealth & sniping in most choke points

[@hunterbolton2277]

Gerrit van der Veer I disagree with you on twisted steel but when it comes to Fjell 652 I agree completely

[@gamingyoshifanatic4082]

Listen up epic gamers. DICE is in big trouble of being defeated by the unhappy audience. To help them, just give them your credit card number and then they can develop new maps and get their *EPIC VICTORY ROYALE!!!*

[@_ben_miller]

but i want them to be defeated

[@_ben_miller]

@Jerod S, bro. i cant afford 120 for a game. if they can't deliver the game without premium, they should get out of the business.

[@Westie]

My ranking of the Battlefield 5 maps - share yours below! Hamada - 5/10 Rotterdam - 5/10 Fjell 652 - 6/10 Aerodrome - 6/10 Narvik - 7/10 Panzerstorm - 7/10 Twisted Steel - 8/10 Devastation - 8/10 Arras - 9/10

[@Marse1009]

Pretty much the same expect rotterdam and devastation are otherway around on my survey.

[@stepvast]

Hmmm🤔 Hamada 4/10 not my map Panzerstorm 6/10 Narvik 6/10 Fjell 7/10 Twisted steel 7/10 Rotterdam 7/10 aerodrome 7/10 Arras 8/10 Devastation 9/10 This was pretty hard cuz if the game was fun or not, depents on so many things, i also had fun games on hamada just not that much you cant play there as you want you have to play with a long range weapon if you ask me. 🤗

[@QcK0101]

@@Marse1009 Yeah, same for me. I dont mind Devastation and Fjell at all, but Rotterdam is atleast playable. It's too small though.. Devastation is great, if you like CoD style infantry gameplay, I dont.

[@joshpowell1732]

I think Hamada should get a three, because of the coloring and visibility issue.

[@Toby-Wan-Kenobi940]

Don’t like Hamada as well and that’s because of the heat blur

[@killerch33z]

Rotterdam is SUPPOSED to be happy and idyllic. The dichotomy between the fighting and tone of the map is the WHOLE POINT

[@philip1549]

Yes but at the end of the day you're playing a war game and are trying to immerse yourself.

[@rosaria8384]

In real life even battlefields are idyllic until someone drops a bomb. Not every battlefield is gritty as media would think.

[@schifferfoto8659]

I agree - besides I found it weird that on Arras there was no comment about it being too happy. Weather is changeable anyway as far as I know.

[@chrisgarret3285]

Philip 154 some of the worst battles in ww2 were at least in part of it fought under a beautiful blue sky what are you talking about?

[@MOISTSQURT]

Shut up

[@brandoncorona9312]

Monte grapa and St Quintin's scar are the maps I want in battlefield

[@Vbytsia]

Good Maps: 1. Devastation 2. Rotterdam 3. Arras Decent Maps: 4. Aerodrome 5. Twisted Steel 6. Fjell 7. Panzerstorm Bad Maps: 8: Narvik Maps that I refuse to play: 9. Hamada

[@vlonebored]

i disagree for narvik, instead flip that with panzerstorm

[@valentinhofmann951]

Boardman Productions I would only put Panzerstorm on bad maps the rest I agree with

[@jacksonsteele3403]

I hate playing on narvik and fjell

[@SystemExclusive]

Whats so bad about Hamada? The village is awesome and ABCD are great if you love sniping, vehicles or destroying vehicles as assault :D

[@Vbytsia]

SystemExclusive I like fun, and puppies, and happiness, therefore I cannot like Hamada.

[@EthanJewellDrones]

PanzerStorm puts me in that Saving Private Ryan feel and Fury feel, need more maps like that

[@UnderCoverIlya]

I don’t care, I am here to spread the good word of pelican channel

[@brodyframpton1090]

Илья всемогущий same

[@JetstreamSamurai]

Hello fellow lads and lasses

[@gamingyoshifanatic4082]

That mad lad of a pelican! What a ledge!

[@UnderCoverIlya]

GamingYoshi Fanatic papa Peli is proud of us!

[@andregal123]

Finally someone say it.....Westie has all points right.....theres NO BACKGROUND SOUND AMBIENTATION.....PERIOD! No atmosphere at all with the maps

[@GremlinSciences]

You mean ambient sound? You ever sat around in Rotterdam on an empty server? You can actually hear people moving around behind many of the closed doors, even hear doors open and close. The problem is just the volume on the ambience is extremely low, making it barely audible even in complete silence.

[@Plaguebearer7]

Its your opinion on if you like it or not.

[@jayschmidt6688]

It happens rarely, but on devastation there is a part where the ‘weather’ changes, flares drop everywhere and gives off a red glow, you look up and see and hear bombers flying over head, the bombing sirens are in the back ground as well as the whistle of bombs and explosions going off all around the city! This is prob the best ambient chaos I’ve heard or seen in a BF map, it’s a wonder they don’t do it more often on other maps 🤔

[@Tmp866]

I hear a lot of cats on Rotterdam

[@andregal123]

@@jayschmidt6688 devastation bomb siren has the biggest ambient iv felt during a match

[@kiwisaft7974]

I would love to see more maps that really deliver a world war 2 feeling.... yeah i know not everyone wants that saving private ryan Style but i think the only map that really gets me a war feeling is devestation... i totaly agree with you! I love urban combat!!!! But the atmosphere is 80% of the fun.....

[@joshhudson2484]

I never feel like I'm in ww2 in this game. Just like a modern setting but everyone's using old guns.

[@lukeppower]

In my opinion, this is how I rate the maps currently on offer: Panzerstorm: 9/10 Arras: 8/10 Devastation: 7/10 Rotterdam: 7/10 Twisted Steel: 7/10 Aerodrome: 6/10 Hamada: 6/10 Narvik: 5/10 Fjell 652: 3/10

[@cheezenachos1770]

I think one of the main problems in hamada is that huge valley that separates between the north part and the south part. Btw I found out that playing as infantry on the north is just so much better that the south. The problem is that of your playing on the British it can be hard to get to there...

[@Bruhskyyy]

My personal top maps are: 1. Arras - I just love the yellow fields that can be used as cover and how it's covers most of the map, it usually allows me to sneak in closer to enemies before engaging them. Being in the small town in the middle usually results in close quarter fights the buildings offer cover of course. And for me personally the map seems really vibrant. 2. Rotterdam - I really like how you can choose to go through the many streets and alleys to get to an objective or you could go up in the bridge to quickly get across the map. 3. Devastation - The church is personally my favorite spot to be in and offers lots of openings to flank from, and heading towards any other objectives (usually) requires to go through broken buildings which results in close quarter fights. 4. Broken Steel - The bridge, I really like its design and how it offers lots of cover(whether you're pushing or defending), and if you want to head down and go towards any other objectives there's trees and shrubbery to offer cover between the points. And tbh I'm really tired right now so I'm just gonna list the rest without a reason. 5. Fjell 6.Narvik 7. Aerodome And Hamada and Panzerstorm are the same for me. (I'm not a fan of vehicle focused maps.)

[@SystemExclusive]

Hamada is half vehicles half infantry. Its beautifull for both sides

[@lifescope]

FD AJ, I agree with all of this.

[@andymore62]

I’d put Fjell higher, and I think Panzerstorm is a lot better than Hamada, as there is some good infantry objectives at C and D. Other than that, solid list.

[@frauenrespektierer8419]

I'm totally sharing you're opinion mate

[@andregal123]

Panzerstorm best map ever....i fukin love it

[@EthanJewellDrones]

They should make maps with good gameplay like Arras, it doesn’t feel empty and it’s one of the fun maps.

[@lukeroberts914]

Totally agree bud, best map for sure

[@chasedavis8362]

Facts

[@garethbarry5738]

Best maps for breakthrough Best to worst 1.Rotterdam 9/10 2.Hamada 8/10 3.Devastation 8/10 4.Aerodrome 7/10 5.Arras 7/10 6.Twisted Steel 7/10 7.Narvak 5/10 8.Panzerstorm (if attackers get past first sector) 5/10 9.Fjell 2/10

[@garethbarry5738]

@Jerod S I'm big on flying and sniping but the heat haze is exaggerated and the fog is horrible

[@gurjindersingh3843]

What's wrong with Fjell?

[@gurjindersingh3843]

Yours is the most unique Sequence I have ever seen.

[@AZoutlaw1997]

I’m glad westie pointed it out, the gritty, dark and brutal feel and sound of an all out war is what always brings me back to Battelfield 1. Only maps I feel that with in Bf 5 is devastation and twisted steel

[@alexishough99]

frontline player top 3 maps: 1:Arras 2:Devastation 3: twisted steel

[@ケンジロ]

I'm the only one who feels like in sertain maps, almost every time the same team wins? Regardles of their level, like in Devastation and Arras by example, Germans almost every match wins, and Roterdam for the British.

[@mingusdingus6959]

For some reason the teams base spawns are close to the 3 first flags. It's really weird and I don't know why dice did this.

[@kyleyork5546]

Westie: complains about the sunshine on maps Also Westie: the sunshinyest map is my favorite map

[@Westie]

French countryside, Germans fighting Brits, tanks everywhere, Spitfires Vs Bf109s in the air... could you get more WW2 than Arras?

[@fatalis3920]

@@Westie 5 for Rotterdam? Come on westie

[@kyleyork5546]

@@Westie no you're right, I'm just giving you a hard time. Love Arras my guy, and you're kinda cool sometimes too!

[@TrainedOldSkool]

Aerodrome and Narvik are the ones I dislike the most, Aerodrome for just being a choke point in the hallway's fest or some recon fool in the rocks a mile away pick you off before you even get close to the hanger and Narvik for being a borefest and campers paradise within the destroyed houses.

[@rajingcajun488]

What I like about Rotterdam’s cheeriness is that it feels like no one woke up ready for war that day, and by the next day, the city is a living hell.

[@ryancook6452]

Do you mean like the invasion of the Netherlands? Like it's based on?

[@montecarlo8325]

1. Devastation 2. Twisted steel 3. Arras 4. Panzerstorm 5. Rotterdam 6. Aerodrome 7. Fjell 652 8. Narvik 9. Hamada

[@derrickcastillo8077]

Mors 3000 id do a couple tweaks but I agree with this in general

[@caleb6221]

Anybody else notice the running soldier with no legs... @ 18:13

[@greasyrails2571]

Caleb the ad killed it but yeab

[@StevieTurtle37D]

1- Arras 2- Twisted Steel 3- Aerodrome 4- Rotterdam 5- Fjell 652 6- Devastation 7- Narvik 8- Panzerstorm 9- Hamada

[@sams2003s]

Stalingrad, Dunkirk, Rome, Crete, Aachen, Zagreb or Leningrad.

[@MOISTSQURT]

Well never see it

[@GStevie_]

Panzerstorm 9/10 Arras 8/10 Devastation 7/10 Twisted steel 8/10

[@killerch33z]

Arras, Twisted Steel, Panzerstorm, Devastation, Rotterdam, Narvik, all 10 out of 10 maps. Hamada is a 9/10, Aerodrome a 7/10, and Fjell 652 a 6/10.

[@KlausDoitschlaaand]

Letting your two squadmates catch bullets, which were for you without warning or reviving them, makes you part of the problem modern battlefield games suffer from the most. Egoistic play/ bad team play. Shame on you.

[@paulholzer8227]

I think every map has pros and cons and how much I like maps is always depends on how my team performs and how I perform :) Great video :)

[@HELLGATE_KOLLEKTIV]

From best to worst IMO 1. Rotterdam 2. Arras 3.Twisted steel 4.Panzerstorm 5.Narvik 6.Fjell 652 7.Devastation 8.Aerodrome 9.Hamada

[@richardswing3238]

numi one I personally love Rotterdam to

[@MEGAcookies100]

Man this is why I love watching bf KZbinrs. I have my favorite maps but I never would have thought about them as in-depth as you guys do. Really opens my eyes to why I like certain maps lol

[@widefox9410]

I like big map so for me panzerstorm is one of the most brillant creation of this game but seriously this battlefield V have the worst maps. Battlefield 1 do a better efforts for this thing just because they want to recreate an immersive gameplay trought the game with much different environment not like bf V . Furthermore they must create a map in the Ardennes or in the Alps or North cap battle and for the Pacific front iwo jima , peleliu , wake island , russian front Stalingrad, Berlin they are lot of inspiration for second world war conflict but dice prefer create cosmetic thing and a useless BR.

[@lasttemplar9070]

I think they stated that they wanted to focus on the lesser known battles. Would be nice to see some action in singapore.

[@widefox9410]

@@lasttemplar9070 That's correct and I want to see Singapour but now some of player leave the game and all the marketing crew was fired because this game is not seller I think dice must put known theaters of war to bringue back player. I like battlefield game and I doesn't want to see EA close dice like some other studio like visceral games

[@matthewS7777]

Damn when people say that it doesn’t feel like ww2 cause it’s “sunny outside” it boggles my mind that they think that every time a ww2 battle was fought it was grey and dark outside

[@some_edgy_name494]

I dont think anyone actually thinks that it was never sunny. But as far as a ww2 game goes it totally ruins the immersion. U want it to feel dark n grim not sunny and cheery. How do u not understand that?

[@matthewS7777]

PATS_NATION_CK I do understand that feelings of immersion are important but I don’t think every map needs to be dark and grey to deliver that, as it just wasn’t the case in real life, and I think that immersion is based on how accurate the combat and locations can be. Some maps yeah, but it’s not necessary to be dark for it to actually be ww2. That’s all I mean.

[@some_edgy_name494]

Its all good man, I've just seen this comment so many times disingenuously when ppl know what they mean. DICE really just have made a lot of mistakes with this one, and im not a hater ive played it for over 500 hrs lol just wish it had a ww2 feel. Go Raps!!!

[@matthewS7777]

PATS_NATION_CK I agree DICE made many many mistakes and yeah I’ve also put around 400 hours in so I know the feeling haha hopefully in the next few months we can get some great ww2 content cause it’s really lacking. Also hell yeah Raps let’s win this titleeee

[@hatchell18]

My top maps from best to worst 1) Arras 2) Devastation 3) Narvik 4) Twisted Steel 5) Fjel 652 6) Rotterdam 7) Aerodrome 8) Hamada 9) Panzerstorm

[@TheSponge945]

The voting is in the survey you fools, not in the comment section.

[@jeffsmith6371]

I can't watch you play never reviving squadmates and retreating over advancing... SMH

[@seabasedd4264]

Nobody: Westie: iTs JuSt ToO hApPy 4:26

[@jeffneinenstein5923]

It’s the blue filter that makes everything seem off for a WWII game. Take that away and it’d be far grittier and better feeling. Narvik and Rotterdam suffer the most in this instance.

[@Scuffkin412]

Only thing is that for Narviks sake it actually makes sence, snow has a blue shadow and it reflects kind of a blue glare y,know?

[@godlyanteater7075]

WTF are you talking about there is no blue filter

[@TheBrickBaron]

The only map I truly despise is Fjell 652. My top 3 are 1. Panzerstorm 2. Twisted Steel 3. Devastation The rest just fall into the middle in no particular order.

[@falldarkraven3]

I remember playing Gulf of Oman for hours in the Battlefield 2 demo; now those were amazing maps compared to the shit small maps we got now. What happen to maps like Dalian Plant. Daqing Oilfields. Dragon Valley. FuShe Pass. Gulf of Oman. Highway Tampa. Kubra Dam. Mashtuur City. All that shit was gold not even including special forces expansion, bf2142 or 1942 for fuck sake

[@tater4462]

Dragon valley is one of my favorite maps

[@robertscott2427]

Dude Mashtuur city is my all time favourite!

[@falldarkraven3]

Robert Scott hell yeah brother! That was an amazing infantry balance map with helicopters and tanks.

[@robertscott2427]

@@falldarkraven3 it was so well balanced. I miss the old days of having transport helicopters. I used to just drop squads on the tops of buildings well avoiding RPGs. The glory days of battlefield for sure.

[@danehampe]

I think fortifications should be buffed via health, i feel they are destroyed far to easy, but that is my opinion

[@TJ-nz8oc]

i agree

[@pcgamer7507]

Really good video westie! Explained really well and this video has changed my opinion abit on a few maps. I will also try squad conquest on Hamada!

[@Guaguadeath]

1. Want more maps 2. Need more maps 3. Dice *plz* more new maps 4. Fuck game is dying.. need maps 5. Maps..... (gasp) more maps....... ☠️

[@joebishop9856]

BEST: Arras Devestation Aerodrome Rotterdam Twisted steel Panzerstorm Narvik Hamada WORST: Fjell 652

[@strikerleecy126]

As the top 600 pc pilot, I pretty love Fjell 652 but it's the second place as Twisted Steel also have decent plane quantity as well as tanks for me to enjoy.

[@justshizy_2880]

I gotta give u respect for still making video’s on this game. I got bored after a week.

[@eastonwaguespack3578]

I want more large combined arms maps, I’m tired of heavily infantry focused clusterfucks. Infantry only/focused maps shouldn’t be in battlefield on Conquest. Not saying none of them work (I’m a fan of Verdun Heights and Passchendaele), but they shouldn’t be what we should get used to. I’m of the opinion that BF1 has waaaay too many infantry focused maps with no or little other types of combat. Maps I think are actual battlefield maps are ones that have a sweet balance all types of combat (infantry, armored, air and sometimes naval). Good examples for me would be Zeebrugge, Heligoland Bight, Paracel Storm, Armored Shield, Sabalban Pipeline, Albion, Panzerstorm and many many others. Infantry only isn’t and shouldn’t be what battlefield is about.

[@eastonwaguespack3578]

I’m sorry about that last line, I meant infantry ONLY isn’t and shouldn’t be what it’s about. Sorry for any anger if you saw that

[@ZeeshanKhan-rj1kl]

Is this game worth getting for £25, it looks like the game is finally "complete" in the sense that all the announced content before the games release has finally come?

[@Westie]

For 25 quid it's worth it with the content it currently has. Don't pay full price.

[@ZeeshanKhan-rj1kl]

@@Westie thats how much its going for on eBay. I like the series but i knew this game wasn't going to be worth full price so i waited till the all the announced content before release came out

[@markevans6285]

Far from complete!

[@joshuabuenano64]

You got it westie. I haven’t played BFV but In BF1 the atmosphere was in every map I got the feeling I was charging the enemy trenches, and even though they were cheesy the behemoths did feel huge compared to to your soldier and mad the battle feel even more massive

[@stormtrooper5454]

I usually don’t comment on videos but I had to comment just to say I hate hamada and panzerstorm lol

[@mohammadabdulrahman1317]

I agree with you about Rotterdam. I think the main reason for muted sounds in Rotterdam or Aerodrome is the lack of planes. I'm not asking for planes for players, but just a squadron of planes go back and forth forming a very loud sound in the sky. I think that will be amazing.

[@leaderofthepack39]

1.Arras 2 Narvik 3. Twisted Steel

[@Kirinko.]

I just love the close quarter maps such as Twisted Steek on the bridge and Narvik on the dock

[@amos_melkersson]

My opinion 1. Arras 2. Twisted Steel 3. Fjell 652 4. Devastation 5. Rotterdam 6. Narvik 7. Panzerstorm 8. Aerodrome 9. Hamada

[@NorthCinematics]

"Rotterdam the library of Battlefield 5" Really i think its pretty action packed on conquest imo

[@Lahnarengas]

Conquest, almost purely infantry: Great/Good: Arras 10/10 Twisted Steel 9/10 Fjell 652 8/10 (probably 10/10 if same theme as Twisted Steel) Rotterdam 8/10 Panzerstorm 7/10 Narvik 7/10 Hamada 7/10 Pure garbage: Devastation 3/10 Aerodrome 2/10

[@edupsidedownhead4809]

lol this is almost identical to what I did on the official survey. Devastation and Aerodrome really are hot garbage juice

[@Lahnarengas]

​@Jerod S Cathedral of Devastation is actually pretty OK but everything around it is not just working IMO. Battles just feels too monotonous every time. Feels too much like Aerodrome just slapped with different theme. And it doesn't help that visibility is really poor on Devastation. Other maps are fine for me. Fjell is really good map for infantry battles. There's no need to run from flag to flag, you'll do so much better if you also defend flags instead of leaving after capping. Also you can usually pretty well predict where enemies are coming and have good fights + you are able to do really good flanks and get behind enemy lines. Only negative with Fjell is that I've never liked snow maps in any game. Otherwise its quite similar with Argonne forest in BF1 which was one of my favourites.

[@Lahnarengas]

​@@edupsidedownhead4809 Devastation seems to be really popular map here so its good to hear that Im not only one hating that :D

[@AlphaZeno]

Dice needs our help? Thought our money with the way things are...

[@yinonyakobi6107]

No one: Literaly no one: No one capable of being a living thing in this world: Westie: ourass

[@anthonynichols1463]

Worst to best. Fjell,Awful.3/10 Areodrome,Cowards (sniper)paradise.3.5/10 Hamada .To big maybe? Just needs more players.4/10 Devistation.CQB heaven.4/10 Narvik .ok on front lines 4.5/10 Rotterdam ,its ok.4.5/10 Twisted steel.Love this on certian modes .5/10 Arras .Again an awsome map 6.5/10 Panzastorm.IMO The best,a proper battlefield map 7/10. Battlefield should be what it says on the tin.

[@kennygudz9326]

You say you think arras is awesome and give it a 6.5

[@hatchell18]

lol wtf is up with your ranking? you say arras is awesome but then give it a 6.5? you give the best maps in the game like devastation and narvik less then a 5? Then you give one of the shittiest maps panzerstorm a 7? lmaoo go home youre smoking crack dude

[@anthonynichols1463]

@@hatchell18 I think i,ve been very fair . The marking out of ten is based on all previous bf maps . There have been far better. And panzerstorm is the best map because it mirrors a Euroupean battlefield.

[@hatchell18]

@@anthonynichols1463 panzerstorm is only for people who like vehicle heavy gameplay. For people who like infantry combat it's a nightmare

[@anthonynichols1463]

@@hatchell18 Like i said its Battlefield not limited infantry special operations.

[@ProChillerGamingPS4]

From best to worse in my opinion: 1.Arras 2.Twisted Steel 3.Rotterdam 4.Narvik 5.Panzerstorm 6.Fjell 7.Devastation 8.Aerodrome 9.Hamada

[@edmundkempin3653]

Pretty much agree. Though I would swap Arras and Twisted Steel

[@92ladderley]

On the subject of Rotterdam's lack of atmosphere...what it is really missing are ambient sounds. For example: If you are in a quiet area you should be able to hear random sounds like a civilian woman wailing from somewhere...like she has just lost her child. Or if you are in a building, maybe behind the inaccessible doors you should be able to hear whimpering or a baby crying...maybe even a creepy piano tune playing, like in the asylum map from COD: World at War. Maybe when a conquest round comes to a close there should be the sound of air raid sirens, to add to the end of round tension.

[@chalemur4550]

I only like aerodrome when I’m in the hanger. Other than that it’s snipers and sniping tanks, and it stops the natural flow of the game, rushing from flag to flag. Just my opinion though.

[@nathanielneal6213]

hey Westie, at 8:27 what outfit did you have on at the time? I just was thinking that the gloves looked pretty cool lol and cant remember what it is called

[@danehampe]

Also i LOVED the grind version of twisted steel i think it should still be in tdm or have itsown twisted steel (1940) version of the map and have some changes less destroyed environment

[@frankenbeans9346]

Honestly, I kinda wanted to get off the bridge and have everyone fight underneath it, it's so beautiful down there and I can see it having a trench warfare type fight

[@mate304]

Even the sunny map Soissons in bf1 has a great atmosphere

[@krummstadt]

1.Fjiel 2. Pancerstorm 3. Narvik 4. Hamada 5.Aerodrome 6.Rotterdam 7.Devastation 8.Twisted Steel 9.Arras And yes, i also love Town section of Araras!

[@Genetical]

I noticed you use the STG-44 on single fire in a lot of situations. Why do you use this over the Gewer? Is it for the versatility where you can choose between fire modes? Or is their something specifically that you find effective about it on single fire?

[@mikegregory6319]

What I would like to see is like they did in bf1 and that's having a vote option for maps at the end of each game that would make it more fun to be able to choose which map u want to play.

[@Code-n-Flame]

In no particular order. Arras, Devistation, Fjell, Rotterdam, Twisted Steel. I like them all honestly. Only map I avoid is Hamada but it's only because most people don't know how to play it.

[@drzoom1611]

I hope that dice adds a map of close corters like Argonne Forrest from bf1

[@CrownClown-Anime-And-Gaming]

i just hate how almost every map taks place on a nice summers day with the sun blaring, be nice to have a change for variety

[@mingusdingus6959]

What would make Rotterdam a good map: Night time, AA shells exploding above the map with planes that fly over (They will just be props.) More destruction on the houses and a big gap in the bridge where the train has fallen down in the water (buildable bridge in the gap). All the beautiful street lights will be on and create a cool lighting effect around the map to make it easier to see. Sometimes there will occur an air alarm like in devestation where those bombers will drop bombs creating craters that soldiers can lie down in. This is pretty much it, I really like night maps for some reason and I personally think this would make for a good map.

[@92ladderley]

On the topic of Hamada, why are the sandstorms so rare? I've only seen one one. It looks cool and works well to change up gameplay. Also the sandstorm should happen every time on the Hamada operation, just so the attackers actually have more of a chance too.

[@TheKandR]

Make sure everyone fill in that survey to get dice to listen to the community

[@philip1549]

Problems with battlefield 5: This game desperately needs more content, the amount of the maps is small, the game needs more maps, there are 9 maps right now. 7 maybe even 8 of them are very badly made/bad map design. Take Fjell for example, snow everywhere meaning that if you are standing on it you are extremely easy to spot and be shot dead by someone that is camping (with an MG that need that forces you to prone/thus encouraging camping) and cannot be seen no matter what, add some blurry pixels to the mix (TAA) and you can't see anything beyond 60 metres. Content however is not just maps, it's also guns. The weapon selection is also extremely small and as if that wasn't enough, in the medic class for example the sten and the mp40 are the exact same gun in terms of statistics/recoil etc. The ZK/383 is also the exact same if you don't get the fire rate upgrade. The mp34 is just.. why, why does it exist, same damage, it has a slightly worse rate of fire and and 10 bullets less if you don't get the upgrade for the bigger mag. Upgrades also have no place in battlefield, bring back the attachments, I know that is near impossible in a WW2 game. That's why the next BF shouldn't be set in such an era. It needs to be modern=more variety. Last but not least, the attrition system. WHY? I've been a fan since BF3. The attrition system was a cool concept at first, but it doesn't work, don't bring it back, just walking up to an ammo station and getting back 3 Panzerfausts, 3 dynamites and 1 AT grenade with the press of button is just ridiculous, thus making playing with tanks very frustrating and almost un-enjoyable. There are more problems within the game but it's hard to list them all, I think these were the most important, correct me if I'm wrong.

[@hugominicantv9441]

Nice video westie, 🤘🤘🤘🤘

[@Westie]

Thanks!

[@RusnakAutoDesign]

Hamadas main issue is not its size, its that it is segregated by the huge gully in the middle. If your team caps all objectives on one side, you DREAD trying to cross with the entire enemy team having high ground, and no cover.

[@Lilljehook]

I hated them all, but some are worse. The hanger map was completely unplayable.

[@doobofbattle9472]

I agree with the footsteps thing but Rotterdam is definitely top 3 for me lol

[@treighpedroche1516]

So I appreciate your opinion here. I think your opinion actually mirrors what most of the modern Battlefield community feels about the Battlefield 5 maps too. For me though, and those of us "old school" Battlefield players that enjoyed 1942 and its excellent mod Desert Combat, Battlefield Vietnam, and Battlefield 2, maps like Hamada and Panzerstorm are actually the best maps and the ones that best represent what made Battlefield great and unique in the first place, namely big open spaces to traverse and sandbox in, clear lines of sight for combat at a distance, the importance of vehicles, and the focus on genuine infantry teamwork to get anything done because single infantry players, much like real modern war, are ineffective without support. It is not to say there is no room for infantry only or infantry focused maps, (1942's Stalingrad comes to mind), but those should be the exception, not the rule. What made so many of us interested in Battlefield back in the day over the likes of Call of Duty, Medal of Honor, Counter-Strike etc. (all infantry focused) is big, open, vehicle focused sandbox fun. #IMissOldBattlefield

[@MrSk3ptic]

I think what's really missing is a PURPOSE for taking an objective. Remember the AC130 and bomber capture points in BF3 and 4? You got a big boost from owning those. Some capture points give your team a positional advantage (Metro, anyone?) But I'd absolutely love to see a more purposeful reason for capturing an objective than ticket depletion. There are tons of heavy artillery pieces in BF5 that are useful in Rush and Airborne but are otherwise useless in any other mode. What about a larger objective to attack\defend, like the bridge on Twisted Metal (I'm looking at you central tower of Siege of Shanghai). I feel destroying the bridge or the elevated railway in Rotterdam was an obvious miss. Carrier Assault from BF4 was pretty close to this idea as well.

[@mrtighe6604]

The only maps i have been playing the last 2 months are Devastation, Rotterdam, and Panzerstorm. Conquest game mode, the others maps i don't enjoy to much. I can't stand Narvik or Flell 652.

[@putinonasmile8478]

Can we get more maps for squad conquest, the ones we already have are very well designed.

[@GotQuality]

1. Panzerstorm (awesome feel of vehicle warfare in this) 2. Rotterdam 3. Arras 4. Aerodrome 5. Devastation 6. Hamada 6. Twisted Steel 7. Narvik 8. Fjell 652 aka the worst map by far

[@hatchell18]

dude devastation is way better then Rotterdam and aerodrome. Narvik and twisted steel are top 3 in the game too so how do you rank them so low? also fjell 652 is great its way better then aerodrome and Rotterdam also. Panzerstorm sucks. Its a map made for pussies who like to hide in a tank all match and get easy kills

[@HouseofChains81]

Even on the vehicle heavy maps I feel like getting a tank is like winning the lottery as the odds of getting one are slim.

[@WolfHunter4466]

The Rotterdam environment needs better atmosphere i feel like every map is sunny it honestly pretty annoying...

[@SystemExclusive]

The sun can realy get in your eyes at some points! Not the kind of realism im looking for. In firestorm also

[@SzczepanLetkiewicz]

As some people already said, some maps work well for only some game modes I listed my 3 least favorite maps for the game modes I play them most. Breakthrough 1.Panzerfaust Too little tickets, (200) 2.Narvik The defense is to easy especially if the attacking team us bad 3.flj Same as narvik^ Conquest 1.Hamada 2.narvik 3.- (rest are good) I dont play the other gamemodes as much so I cant say if their good or could use some improvement. It's just my opinion let me know if u disagree😃

[@M0sh3r100]

18:13 1/2 a man I only like Devestation, rest are meh but bareable. Hate Narvik, Fjell and Aerodrome. I only play infantry and conquest.

[@OneHunnitNoCapStannitOnBidnisz]

I only play tdm n only like arras n devastation

[@alexhaisting]

I poured my heart out in the sections where you could input your opinion. Honestly, I think BFV is a game with SO MUCH POTENTIAL, but I'm assuming EA rushed them and now we are playing a extremely unfinished/unpolished game. I think if they could give the community more theaters of war that we know (Ex. Stalingrad, Market Garden, Iwo Jima, etc.) that would be a great start, and then start putting more familiar weapons in the game instead of all the left field random weapons that in some cases were rarely used. BR needs to extreme love and attention, Combined Arms would be great if it were more like the War Stories but Co-Op, and then just continuing to polish the game and work out the bugs. I would love to see BFV have a 5-7 HEALTHY life cycle, instead of them pulling a COD and releasing another game every year. Treat the game more like it's successors (Fortnite, R6S, WarFrame, etc.) and let this game be WHAT IT MOST CERTAINLY CAN BE. Call of Duty has went to hell, Medal of Honor has died, and now Battlefield, my LONG STANDING favorite series is starting to get a little dicey (no pun intended). Anyways, if there is any ballpark chance in hell a developer reads this, know that I have faith in you and think you're all beyond talented, just give this some more love and care and please don't run away from it. Rant over.

[@peltomies6975]

Bad 9. Hamada 8.Aerodrome 7.Panzerstorm 6. Twisted steel 5.fjell 4.devestation 3.narvik 2.rotterdam 1.arras Good

[@marwendk4806]

You're the awesome one, thank you for the amazing content!

[@justo7336]

Only westie would be able to make a 20 minute video on a game as barebones as BF5

[@ToxicPancake88]

You’re right about the atmosphere, a lot of the maps in bfv are way too vibrant and sunny. Kinda would prefer some overcast, dirty, gritty and rainy maps, even on devastation the morning sun is bloody shining away

[@RobPento]

WORST: Hamada (in any game mode) Rating: -10 (NEGATIVE 10 .. .LESS than 0). I agree with you. Rotterdam is not worse than Fjell or Aerodome in my opinion. Arras is your BEST map, and it's in the top of mine. I'm rating on infantry play, not vehicles. Panzerstorm is right below Hamada. Large open maps with lots of space are not my favorite at all.