RE: the phone in Manhunter. If you notice in the clip you used, there is no set of buttons or rotary to dial the number. After removing the blank plate, Lector is using the foil gum wrapper to create the pulse needed to dial out. So you are right in a way, he's hot-wiring the phone. That phone wasn't meant to make outbound calls and he's found a way around that.
@couchbumkino54235 ай бұрын
Thank you
@kluneberg89525 ай бұрын
there was a kid in the 70s that used whistling to "hack" into a payphone. its called phreaking and is used in the Hannibal tv show
@carlossaraiva82134 ай бұрын
@@kluneberg8952it was alfo used in a flashback scene set in the late 70s in the TV series Person Of Interest.
@carlossaraiva82134 ай бұрын
Using a piece of metal on a phone to get a free call trick is also seen in Wargames.
@couchbumkino54234 ай бұрын
@@carlossaraiva8213 excellent obscure trivia
@Nasedo345 ай бұрын
In 1979-80, when the book Red Dragon was written (being published in 81)... A "pop can tab" was different from the item you're conceptualizing and did not look like the item shown in the movie "Red Dragon." In those days, circa 1979, a pop can tab would pull all the way off the can with a little bit of the lid attached. Some people would drop them into their drink so they didn't have to find a trash can. The type of pop tab we have now was introduced in the 80s. In "Manhunter", all of those people knew what the original author meant by "pop can tab" because they remembered how those pop cans looked. They included the candy wrapper because they knew dropping a pop can tab in 1986 would be harder to do. By 2002, they had forgotten why a pop can tab would be on the ground... But in the interest of faithful adaptation, they included an anachronistic version of the item in question. So, in a way, neither adaptation got it right. But "Manhunter" makes more sense
@chanceotter81215 ай бұрын
I saw Manhunter its opening weekend and think it is pretty near a masterpiece, stylistically and visually very similar to Mann’s first 2 features. At the time, Lector was only a supporting character from the book, and placing his cell in a white and sterile setting is a contrast to the darkness in the minds of both Lector and Graham. The actual location was an art museum in Atlanta, which was a sly way of pointing to Lector’s attitude to his mayhem, and visually connecting it to Dollarhydes’s ultra-modern decor. Also, the later adaptation was saddled with reusing Demme’s vision of Lector in a leftover set from a Corman Poe adaptation, which I always thought was cartoony. Manhunter’s ‘In-a-Gada-da-Vida’ finale is a visual and aural masterpiece of filmmaking, one of Mann’s best set pieces, the darkness of both men fighting in a fallen paradise.
@scheddoc4 ай бұрын
Agree completely. I think Manhunter is a masterpiece and it's one of my favorite films (big fan of the book as well)
@Silas_Kow5 ай бұрын
Bro, any video that brings back Manhunter is great news to me, that film was so different from everything I ever watched that I fell in love instantly
@couchbumkino54235 ай бұрын
@@Silas_Kow glad you enjoyed it friend 😎
@Indigo_Gaming5 ай бұрын
Oh yeah, now this is another great topic. I finally sat down and watched both adaptations last year, and I was incredibly impressed by how atmospheric and fascinating Mann's adaptation was Hopkins always gets a ton of praise due to his sinister portrayal, but I actually like Brian Cox's more "guy next door" take on him (inspired by a real-life serial killer, IIRC). Overall, I prefer Manhunter due to its sheer dreamlike quality and style. Though I will say that the ending of Red Dragon is a lot more interesting, taking the psychoanalyst approach versus a shootout.
@nl30644 ай бұрын
To clarify, Michael Mann began as executive producer on Miami Vice. Anthony Yerkovich created the show, then quickly stepped away after a few episodes due to creative differences with Mann (seems Yerkovich wanted a more run of the mill buddy cop show, whereas Mann wnated something loftier and cinematic). So Mann took over as showrunner after only 6 episodes.
@MrTibster5 ай бұрын
Quickly becoming one of my favourite channels without a doubt. Absolutely loving these videos
@MonkeysMightPuke5 ай бұрын
They changed the name of the first movie because producer Dino De Laurentiis had just had a massive flop with a film called Year Of The Dragon, and after that he didn't want to make any more movies with the word 'dragon' in the title.
@couchbumkino54235 ай бұрын
Thanks! Manhunter seems like the first title they came up with after thinking for 30 seconds
@KolozII5 ай бұрын
I heard it was because Kung Fu films were really popular before then, and people were getting tired of them by the mid 80s. And “Red Dragon” sounded like the title of another Kung Fu movie, so they decided to pick a different name
@KolozII5 ай бұрын
To be honest, both stories are probably true
@chanceotter81215 ай бұрын
I always presumed “Manhunter” became the title because Mann wanted to focus on Will Graham and his ability to enter the emotions and mindset of the killers, and the serial killer hunting of families to slaughter. It also fits with the ending that it is Graham who hunts down Tooth Fairy.
@buddhull5 ай бұрын
Manhunter is one of my all-time favs. But regardless of that, it beats out the rest stylistically even if it isn’t the most accurate otherwise.
@TheBS10005 ай бұрын
Why didn't you cover the adaptation that NBC's Hannibal did in its final season?
@egads36965 ай бұрын
Thats it, im not finishing the video.
@jvcyt2985 ай бұрын
Sometime between 1986 and 1990 a coworker lent me a VHS of Manhunter, he taped it off of HBO or Showtime, it was awesome. This was even before The Silence of the Lambs, so for its time, it stood on its own.
@amyv.21305 ай бұрын
This should be interesting b/c I cannot imagine anyone other than "that guy from Westworld" playing Hannibal Lecter! Edit: Ah, it's "that guy from CSI" playing Will Graham in Manhunter!
@lestatdelc5 ай бұрын
For me Brian Cox was a far superior Hannibal. That he could give a cold, lucid, rational explanation on why he is is serial killer to Will Graham, is absolutely bone-chilling.
@mordaciousfilms5 ай бұрын
I LOVE Manhunter as just it's own film. I saw it BEFORE I saw Silence of the Lambs, even. It was on Comcast cable when I was a kid or tween and I watched it and LOVED how atmospheric and 80s it was. That whole showdown with "In A Gadda Da Vida" is so damn epic!!!
@tenimeartstudios5 ай бұрын
No season 3 of Hannibal? 😅 For real, though, Mads Mikkelsen is my favorite Hannibal Lecter, as are the rest of the cast of the show my favorite versions of all the Harris characters. PLUS: the one scene of Hannibal & Will in the book & Manhunter is, to my recollection, verbatim to the book, Manhunter, and Red Dragon. There's a great video on here where someone interspliced all three together. It's amazing. (Also, the show also shows Will catching Hannibal.)
@couchbumkino54235 ай бұрын
Lots of people recommended the show here I’ve got to check it out
@aarkwrite72405 ай бұрын
I loved loved loved Hannibal the series. Glad they got around to the Red Dragon story arc
@tenimeartstudios5 ай бұрын
@aarkwrite7240 I'm still super sad & super salty at NBC at cancelling it & the DeLaurentis Company for hoarding the Silence of the Lambs rights. I know it's mostly rumors & no actual Fuller-involved plans, but Elliott Page as Clarice Starling & Lee Pace as Buffalo Bill would've been SO GOOD. And the PERFECT final season for the series.
@aarkwrite72405 ай бұрын
@@tenimeartstudios right? That casting would’ve been great but I would’ve accepted anyone if it meant they could give us their take on SotL. Alas the cancel hammer came down 😭
@notmyrealpseudonym67025 ай бұрын
Ivd never watched your channel before, really well done! Thank you
@maxmcgloin5 ай бұрын
I read Red Dragon in 1981 and saw Manhunter on its opening day without knowing it was based on Red Dragon. On its own or as an adaption Manhunter is a masterpiece. The later Red Dragon is so over the top it is awful. Brian Cox is brilliant as Hannibal. He is cool and organized, you can imagine him moving through society, whereas Hopkins is theatrical and obvious and would have been caught day one. Noonan is as horrifying as the Tooth Fairy but also manages to show real tenderness. Sadly I think your palate was already overwhelmed with the late films turn it to 11 take. If you have seen Manhunter, please check it out, it is fantastic. You really missed the boat.
@couchbumkino54235 ай бұрын
You overwhelmed my palate with this comment lol
@papa._.burkett35355 ай бұрын
YESSSS BEEN WAITING FOR ANOTHER BOOK TO FILM ANALYSIS!!
@unshdhGbzbs5 ай бұрын
How does this guy not have millions of subscribers
@garyfoss43945 ай бұрын
It might just be that I saw Manhunter when it came out, but I'm not as enamored with Hopkins version of the character as most people seem to be. Don't get me wrong, I still like Hopkins' performance, but Brian Cox plays a much more physical Lekter (or Lecktor) than Hopkins. He's more menacing in a primal sense. I can see that character as a cannibal more readily than the more restrained Hopkins version. He'd revel in the violence and pain or its own sake. Hopkin's version is more cerebral and those things are somewhat byproducts than things in and of themselves. Of course, Hopkins also had multiple appearances as the character to fill it out more fully, which gives his version more a lead, especially since he plays Red Dragon after having already cut his teeth (as it were) in Silence of the Lambs. It does make me wonder what Cox would have done with the character had he played him again.... We'll never know.
@htershane4 ай бұрын
Firstly, I love both films. I cope quite happily with both in my collection. As a film about hunting a serial killer “Manhunter” is just brilliant, ahead of its time but weirdly very of its time too. As a Hannibal film I’m less enthused but then “Manhunter” was not made as a Hannibal flick or with an eye on franchise making. “Red Dragon” was very much made with a franchise in mind, with added Hannibal for good measure but still a pretty good adaptation of the novel in its own right even if I find Ratner’s direction a bit indistinctive. Both “Tooth Fairy”s are brilliant, Fiennes take on Dolarhyde more sympathetic but Noonan’s (still) terrifying version definitely gives “Manhunter” an edge there I think. Hopkins’ Hannibal absolutely stole “SOTL” I think AH won the Oscar for the performance for precisely that reason. Cox however didn’t steal “Manhunter’ not because of any perceived inferiority of performance but because he played it much more as A character in a story rather than THE character of the story. I can actually see Cox doing “SOTL” but probably in the same way as “Manhunter” he wouldn’t have stood out as much as Hopkins did and consequently Hannibal would probably not be the iconic anti-hero he is now. Had Michael Mann cast Hopkins as Hannibal is an interesting notion, but I think it would be still be along the lines of what we see in “Silence”. If I want to watch a superior serial killer film I’d go for “Manhunter” if I want to watch a Hannibal film id probably go for …er…”Hannibal”😂
@josephsecker4025 ай бұрын
Thank you. That was a great comparison. I saw Manhunter after I saw Silence of the Lambs, so I was a little prejudice about the character.
@cthulhu3065 ай бұрын
PLEASE do a video on all the invasion of the body snatchers versions. I love your stuff
@couchbumkino54235 ай бұрын
Thanks so much! That one is on my to do list! These take a little while to make (haven't read the book or seen the movies) but stay tuned and I'll get to it
@courtneyvaldez79034 ай бұрын
The newer version is very well casted, but Manhunter feels so much more realized as story unto itself. The newer version has the weird “we have to shove Hannibal at the audience at every opportunity to sell this product” feeling I just can’t get over. It’s solid-I like having more time with Dollarhyde in Red Dragon, but Manhunter goes for the mystery angle and is the better for it. Its cast is also top tier.
@ianmpena5 ай бұрын
In my opinion tom noonan is scarier as the tooth fairy
@VonWenk5 ай бұрын
Wrigley's Spearmint is chewing gum , not bubble gum.
@couchbumkino54235 ай бұрын
@@VonWenk Really? I thought it was a type of meat. Like radishes. Radishes are types of meat they are types of nut they are meat.
@amandabruno36315 ай бұрын
Actually radishes are the red eyeball of god
@redeem1475 ай бұрын
I know you're comparing films, but I'm, both pale next to the Red Dragon story in the TV series Hannibal
@couchbumkino54235 ай бұрын
@@redeem147 looks like a part 2 is in order…
@nl30644 ай бұрын
The names are spelled slightly different for legal purposes. Something like they couldn't fully clear the rights to all aspects of the book, so Lector is spelled Lektor, and for the same reason I assume Dolarhyde with the extra L (or maybe Dolarhyde was just mispelled in the credits?). I love it when people complain when they don't know a basic piece of trivia.
@couchbumkino54234 ай бұрын
@@nl3064 oh well lol feel free to flag my video for terroristic activity
@NostalgiNorden4 ай бұрын
Red Dragon doesn't use lame exposition: ZERO POINTS!
@aarkwrite72405 ай бұрын
I never realized Red Dragon is older than I am
@doughbafett3 ай бұрын
4:47 Did Manhunter actually say Will Graham was the stepfather?
@Alienmojo5 ай бұрын
I actually liked Brian Cox better as Lector. He looked more like a killer to me. Maybe it was because I saw it first??
@christophertletski48945 ай бұрын
Odds are you never watched Manhunter when it came out. I loved it when it came out.
@couchbumkino54235 ай бұрын
@@christophertletski4894 how old do you think I am? Lol
@blueworldcomics79085 ай бұрын
Trying to think of another book adaptation you can do this with... Stephen King's It comes to mind.
@yggdrasil24 ай бұрын
Are you planning on covering the adaptation in the Hannibal tv-series? It's really good.
@couchbumkino54234 ай бұрын
@@yggdrasil2 never seen the show but enough people suggested it that yes someday I’ll cover it 👍🏼
@yggdrasil24 ай бұрын
@@couchbumkino5423 It basically started off as a soft prequel to the movies, but set in current day and without pretending the actors will grow to look like the ones in the movies. Then season 3 basically says f it and goes for a loose adaptation of Hannibal with some Hannibal Rising sprinkled in, culminating in a surprisingly faithful Red Dragon adaptation in its later half. It works much better than it has any right to be.
@couchbumkino54234 ай бұрын
@@yggdrasil2 Thanks for the info. I’ve heard some of it before but I look forward to checking it out. I’m guessing it’s like its own timeline/universe separate from the movies and books?
@yggdrasil24 ай бұрын
@@couchbumkino5423 Yep, it's its own universe.
@Freshie2075 ай бұрын
Are you going to cover the TV show Hannibal? Thats obviously a longer version (Thus I can understand if that's too big a commitment), but it does adapt Red Dragon very similarly
@couchbumkino54235 ай бұрын
I have not seen the show yet. Is it good?
@SuperCakeKing5 ай бұрын
@@couchbumkino5423the show is far removed from the books and films its got its own charm but very much a modernized take it lacks the artistic/aristocratic charm of the original ip
@nittonama35 ай бұрын
@@couchbumkino5423 yes its the definitive version of hannibal, as well as the best red dragon adaptation.
@Freshie2075 ай бұрын
@@couchbumkino5423 I liked it, the more sureal imagery reminded me more of Manhunter than Red Dragon, which is the version I prefered in the films. And I thought Mads Mikkelsen gave a really interesting performance as Lector.
@levischorpioen5 ай бұрын
@@couchbumkino5423 It’s the perfect adaptation for people (like myself) who prefer original, experimental takes on already existing source material as opposed to just wanting cheap rehashes (I believe the creator dropped the word “remix” which I think is a fair description as it does play somewhat loose and fast with the chronology of events as we know from the novels and films). It honors the source material wonderfully while injecting its own influences from Nordic crime dramas and art house cinema. It tapers off a bit in the third season (which they quickly had to rehash as a final season even if they originally were counting on a 5-season run), which unfortunately is the one that gets into Red Dragon, but I’d still argue the show as a whole is an absolute masterpiece. I still don’t know how the hell they got away with, well, most of the things they pulled off on that show on a regular cable network. Mads Mikkelsen is also the ultimate Lector. I said it.
@RightNowMan4 ай бұрын
Good video, thanks for making!👍
@srstriker64205 ай бұрын
How about the Island of Dr Moreau adoptions and Sleepy Hollow?
@KamikazeCash5 ай бұрын
I’m deeply impressed by your continued ability to assess these films through the lens of post-imperialist social hypercapitalism within the cinema industry. I haven’t found a more pragmatic review channel, and I don’t think there is one. Keep up this great work!
@hashvendetta72265 ай бұрын
Thank you for making this The first comment. Now I can disregard the rest of this video and "do not suggest" the channel. I appreciate you dearly
@KamikazeCash5 ай бұрын
@@hashvendetta7226 You need to work on your Internet literacy
@wildcrochunter67245 ай бұрын
@@hashvendetta7226you can’t read
@hashvendetta72265 ай бұрын
@@KamikazeCash I read it just fine
@KamikazeCash5 ай бұрын
@@hashvendetta7226 and you really thought “post-imperialist social hypercapitalism” was a real thing, and that it is part of the woke agenda.
@charleslennon15 ай бұрын
I'm a new fan, excellent synopsis. Will you critique Heat or The Wire?
@couchbumkino54235 ай бұрын
Thank you! Heat: saw a long time ago, must re-watch. The Wire: saw it a year ago and loved it, but I'd have to watch it again to fully grasp it, there's so many layers.
@papa._.burkett35355 ай бұрын
I know it’s not a crazy and elaborate book but the outsiders was one of my favorite books I read growing up, I’d love to see a book to film analysis, I understand there’s only one film so there wouldn’t be multiple comparisons, but I think the story is so good you can fill out an entire video with the similarities!!
@couchbumkino54235 ай бұрын
I read it once waaaay back in school I’ll look it up again 👍🏼
@papa._.burkett35355 ай бұрын
@@couchbumkino5423 dope! 😎
@gachoman20125 ай бұрын
Cox > Hopkins
@onepcwhiz68475 ай бұрын
Talk about Clarice and Lector at the end of Hannibal (book vs movie).
@couchbumkino54235 ай бұрын
Haven't read the Hannibal book yet, but I did read what happens at the end and I was like 🤯
@jpofgwynedd38785 ай бұрын
...yeah, no. Brian Cox is far more chilling for me: Anthony Hopkins turned Lector into a pantomime villain for me... so he's on the table with fava beans and a nice chianti SLURPY SLURPY SLURPY
@couchbumkino54235 ай бұрын
If that's how you feel that's totally valid. We're all allowed to draw our own conclusions.
@downix5 ай бұрын
While I did not find Hopkins as silly as that, I do agree that Cox was the far more disturbing portrayal for me.
@couchbumkino54235 ай бұрын
@@downix I think part of it for me is that I watched the Hopkins performances many times growing up across 3 movies and Cox has like 15 minutes of screen time lol I’ve got to analyze it more
@srstriker64205 ай бұрын
@@couchbumkino5423well I guess you know that Brain Cox was in X2 and it got me thinking about the adoption of both of the Dark Phoenix movie adoption
@lestatdelc5 ай бұрын
Agreed. When Brian Cox explains to Will on the phone, in a calm cold way, why he's a serial killer… "that god kills indiscriminately all the time, so if one does what god does enough, one becomes as god is." Giving a 100% rational argument (in that it is internally logical and rational) fir "why" one is a serial killer is bone-chilling.
@redfox035 ай бұрын
You’re a beast keep it up ‼️‼️‼️
@nittonama35 ай бұрын
the show hannibal did the red dragon arc the best.
@couchbumkino54235 ай бұрын
Goddamnit now I have to watch
@adsdsds61905 ай бұрын
@@couchbumkino5423The red dragon arc only happens at the second half of season 3 so you don't need to watch the whole thing if you wanna do a comparison (though I highly suggest you do :p)
@couchbumkino54235 ай бұрын
@@adsdsds6190 thank you lol I will probably watch whole thing at some point
@notmyrealpseudonym67025 ай бұрын
@couchbumkino5423 highly recommend Hannibal TV series! Just for the visuals alone
@couchbumkino54235 ай бұрын
@@notmyrealpseudonym6702 I saw one clip and was like 😮
@therealCrazyJake4 ай бұрын
Now do The Hunchback or Notre Dame… Should make for a VERY long video. 😆
@couchbumkino54234 ай бұрын
@@therealCrazyJake lol there are some I’ve thought of but just don’t want to do because it would take forever. Like Dracula and it’s 5 million adaptations
@maxmcgloin5 ай бұрын
If you have not watched Manhunter do not watch this video until you have done so.
@speedmastermarkiii5 ай бұрын
Mads Mikkelsen's Hannibal Lecter leaves Cox and Hopkins in the dust.
@vasglorious5 ай бұрын
I think both movies have a director's cut, so that's worth checking.
@couchbumkino54235 ай бұрын
WHAT?!?
@streetwithoutjoy5 ай бұрын
@@couchbumkino5423 Yes, Manhunter has a director's cut
@Enfixed5 ай бұрын
Should've included the TV adaptation but I understand why you didn't due to the prior context needed
@couchbumkino54235 ай бұрын
And the fact that I haven't seen it
@McKinnonMitchell5 ай бұрын
And for your next video: Red Dragon vs Hannibal Season 3. Make it so.
@couchbumkino54235 ай бұрын
Eventually yes
@Queenpierogi19955 ай бұрын
Anthony Hopkins is a legend
@Percenttwoeff5 ай бұрын
Dude yes
@couchbumkino54235 ай бұрын
Dude thanks
@onepcwhiz68475 ай бұрын
I'm surprised you didn't know that.
@couchbumkino54235 ай бұрын
Know what?
@onepcwhiz68475 ай бұрын
@@couchbumkino5423 sorry.. I was talking about Manhunter. But I'm a big Michael Mann fan.
@feuerstrassen94465 ай бұрын
Why throw that poor book though?
@couchbumkino54235 ай бұрын
@@feuerstrassen9446 it owes me money
@Bosanovadude15 ай бұрын
Manhunter>>>>>>
@eighto220_fps5 ай бұрын
No
@couchbumkino54235 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@eighto220_fps5 ай бұрын
@@couchbumkino5423oh yes, and there will be more of them, of course