Get the exclusive NordVPN deal here: nordvpn.com/rfb. It’s risk free with Nord’s 30 day money-back guarantee!
@alananimus91452 жыл бұрын
Valentinanism is a Pauline sect.
@ForbiddenHistoryLIVE2 жыл бұрын
HELLO DO YOU DO INTERVIEWS ? I AM A TRANSLATOR ... CAN SEND YOU SAMPLES OF MY TRANSLATION PROJECT. Dezert
@jacovawernett30772 жыл бұрын
Could you delve into the Jacobites.?
@pocohax65522 жыл бұрын
I don’t think they always referring to Jesus when they describing the sons of god
@bethbartlett56922 жыл бұрын
Consider this: *The Defining* It's the "defining that can create the misunderstanding", example: "belief in a lower Creator god", (can mean, a knowledge of a physical being that was involved in a scientific DNA manipulation that resulted in Modern Homosapiens, and this based on Ancient Knowledge/Sumerian Texts, and the label "god/little g" having a title relative to that like the British "lord", and not to be confused with the Creator, Source, *God* ... It is a matter of how the use of the title indicates "having a part in creating something", later an interpretation that was in line with Social Levels. (when we are absent or not as familiar with a previous foundation, the observation can appear most distorted to our understanding.) Gnostics had Ancient Knowledge and thus existed prior to Yeshua, and he made a major "add on value thru his gifts, studies, and accomplishments" (this included the Hermetic Principals aka Universal Laws, particularly the "Universal Law of Attraction")
@TheEsotericaChannel2 жыл бұрын
Wonderful! Actually working on an episode on the Epistle to Flora and Summer Harvest for next week!
@ReligionForBreakfast2 жыл бұрын
Awesome. I wasn't able to squeeze Summer Harvest into this video.
@TheEsotericaChannel2 жыл бұрын
@@ReligionForBreakfast It's tiny anyway - the whole episode will be 'gnostic' texts only preserved in polemical sources, including a 'cathar' text preserved in Durand of Huesca's c.1222 Liber Contra Manicheos - Many thanks as always for your work and inspiration, Andrew!
@Pilgrimsrummet2 жыл бұрын
That is beyond fat! 🥰
@theeccentrictripper38632 жыл бұрын
@@TheEsotericaChannel Best crossover ever, feels like the universe is collapsing every time I see two creators I watch interacting
@PunkRockPetSitter2 жыл бұрын
I am SO THERE!!!! 😆👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽
@jeffaltier55822 жыл бұрын
I find Valentinians, Sethians, Hermeticists, and all so called Gnosticism to be utterly fascinating.
@DrownedinDesigner2 жыл бұрын
I just think they’re heretics.
@francescoazzoni34452 жыл бұрын
@@DrownedinDesigner based and ireneus-pilled
@mhertin6602 жыл бұрын
@@DrownedinDesigner heresy can be fascinating
@nosuchthing82 жыл бұрын
@@DrownedinDesigner they didn't set out to be heretics
@namelessdark47012 жыл бұрын
@@DrownedinDesigner hindsight is 20/20
@alanb88842 жыл бұрын
There's a sci-fi book calked Mysterium, by Robert Charles Wilson where a small Michigan town gets pulled into an alternate reality where Valentinus DID become Bishop of Rome and a gnostic form of Christianity became orthodox. One line resounded with me. The new world's religious investigators found the Christianity of the transported townsfolk almost Jewish in nature, due to their strict monotheism.
@mikeryan4055 Жыл бұрын
Sounds like a good book, thanks for that.
@NightDocs2 жыл бұрын
I’m so fascinated with Gnosticism please keep covering this stuff!
@fluentpiffle2 жыл бұрын
There is one biblical story that intrigues me, and that is the story of Noah. I think this may be a timeless anecdote that we can apply to any 'knower' of today. It then takes on the form of a kind of collective unconscious prediction, as anyone who followed the trail of truth would ultimately find themselves in the same position as the biblical character, and likely HAS done through the ages..Giordano Bruno, for instance.. This would explain why the story retains an air of credibility. The events unfolding in the story WOULD mimic the real life situation in ANY age, given that the underlying nature of Humans remains roughly the same. Behaviour is predictable once it wears itself into a pattern, and that in itself is a perfect example of how nature works, at the fundamental level..
@isaacleillhikar45662 жыл бұрын
I make vidéos about it. Like "Is the Protoecagelium by the gnostics."
@BMXOPHY2 жыл бұрын
In case you are interested, Gnosticism has now evolved into Anthroposophy, aka, contemporary Rosicrucian/Manichean gnosticism.
@patrickbrumm4202 жыл бұрын
if you listen to podcasts try Talk Gnosis
@rad49242 жыл бұрын
"Not making things out of thin pneuma." I noticed the subtle joke. I laughed.
@matthewwallack6012 жыл бұрын
I was going to comment about this lol
@Mari_Oh2 жыл бұрын
And flawlessly delivered with a straight face!
@rylepurple1996 Жыл бұрын
Why he used word "Pneuma? in english bible?" he can just use the word "Spirit"so international people can easily understand. he just used Pneuma to fit ideas of Valentinians.
@DYLANANDRE9 ай бұрын
The tablet reads “Flavia Sophe, freedwoman of Aurelius Hermia, a woman of modesty and piety, lived 30 years, 7 months, and 20 days. Aurelius Hermia, her former master, and husband made this tomb for her and for himself and for their freedperson.” What you wrote was a quote from The Gospel of Phillip. 0:29
@jackstrawful2 жыл бұрын
Went straight from here to listening to a reading of the entire Tripartite Tractate - about 2 hrs long. Despite it's ethereal subject matter and esoteric jargon, I think it's quite easy for a modern person to absorb, because it's written more like a logical thesis than a typical piece of scripture. It's so clearly written by a highly intelligent Hellenic person who has accepted the Jewish savior and aspects of Jewish mysticism and is trying to re-imagine them in a way that makes more sense to a Greek mind. Utterly fascinating.
@phillipstroll73852 жыл бұрын
Jewish savior? Who would that be? I didn't know the Jewish religion had a savior. They've had many as far as I can tell. The one they called Christ was Simon. Then bar korhba. Certainly not Jesus. Every savior they claimed was their savior they dismissed after their failure. Just as they claimed god had an earthly house, the temple. Until their temples continued to be destroyed. Then suddenly nope. They didn't need a temple and they gave it away. So you see my confusion by your statement
@DoctorDee332 жыл бұрын
@@phillipstroll7385 you are correct Phil. The idea of mashiach (messiah ) is an ancient one in Judaism. Well, sort of. It developed over the years. The messianic concept was introduced later in the history of Judaism, during the age of the prophets. the messianic concept is not explicitly mentioned anywhere in the Torah (the first five books of the Bible). The Jewish idea of mashiach (messiah / ) is a great human leader like King David, not a savior. The literal translation of the Hebrew word mashiach (המשיח, messiah), is 'anointed', which refers to a ritual of consecrating someone or something by putting holy oil upon it. & this comment was for Al Cheers!
@stustig9430 Жыл бұрын
Yes, although the Valentinians were not totally right at least they were trying - goes for most of us
@hermanhale9258 Жыл бұрын
@@phillipstroll7385 Probably better to say "the Zoroastrian savior". Meaning, the idea of a savior.
@ryujin2101 Жыл бұрын
Utterly Ridiculous, the Minds of Morons merely seemed to be reproduced Over n Over, no Intellectual being buys such, they merely make Us t Control the Simple one's and profit OFF THEIR WEAK minds. And still today Terrorism is a Good tool to USE and Profit of simple one's.
@samuelfraley87372 жыл бұрын
This channel gives me so many interesting topics to discuss with my dad. Thanks Andrew!
@TheCuriousAutumn Жыл бұрын
How nice to have these discussions together. I love it. ❤
@Breakable_Pencil2 жыл бұрын
The bride groom and bridal chamber play a large role in Eastern Orthodox theology, specifically surrounding the crucifixion and the church’s role as the bride of Christ.
@DISTurbedwaffle9182 жыл бұрын
These also are still maintained in Catholic theology, both Western and Eastern.
@noahsolomon15502 жыл бұрын
So enlightening
@BonJoviBeatlesLedZep2 жыл бұрын
@@DISTurbedwaffle918 Yeah, I was about to say. That metaphorical relationship was used a lot by the priest of my Roman Catholic church growing up. But in my diocese, they rotate priests throughout the country every few years. And ideologies change between priests so perhaps it's not as widespread an analogy as I had thought.
@DISTurbedwaffle9182 жыл бұрын
@@BonJoviBeatlesLedZep Some priests are bigger theologians than others. The one you have now probably just isn't as advanced in his knowledge.
@Me-hf4ii10 ай бұрын
The bride groom and bridal chamber imagery is part of all Christianity - orthodox, East, west, Protestant - all of it… doesn’t mean the rest of the theology is in accord with what Jesus actually taught. Eastern and Western Catholic Churches are too devoted to a woman called Mary for my taste. Too fleshly of an interpretation of the Miracle of Christ’s incarnation - and it’s very much like she has been deified in these churches. Yes He really came in the flesh - but he could have chosen a prostitute just as easily as a virgin. He chose the virgin to highlight the Miracle (a pregnant prostitute isn’t something all that odd - but a pregnant virgin shows people something very peculiar has happened) - and if Mary of Nazareth had said no, he would have found another woman who would have said yes.
@feigenblatt2 жыл бұрын
I just found your channel and your introduction alone had me sold. The clarity, care and respect with which you present the historical context, prejudices and misconceptions are extraordinary. And the quality of the presentation holds up until the end. Now I have backlog of videos to watch. I promise to not pay much attention to the production quality of your early videos 😜
@straightupanarg62262 жыл бұрын
One of my youthful follies was looking into gnosticism, and somehow it managed to fly right over my head that gnosticism was a stream of Christianity, and that the "demiurge" theology is a cosmological attempt for Christians to reconcile God as he appears in the Old Testament, with the God that Jesus teaches. Somehow (I won't say how) I kept thinking of gnosticism as a kind of seperare philosophy, rather than as a branch of explicitly Christian thought. It makes so much more sense now. Thanks!
@Plethorality2 жыл бұрын
well it is not as if we proestants were taught that there was any other approach than our particular denominaton, that was not heresy, thus wrong. we had all tge answers and questions were not allowed.
@TheGuiltsOfUs2 жыл бұрын
They never understood rabbi Yeshua in the first place, radical Torah observance - not its abandonment for pagan ideas!
@TheSulross Жыл бұрын
that is the one core feature of these various so-called Gnostic Christians and the Marcionite Christians - they all had huge problems with the Jewish deity Yahweh of the Hebrew bible and found that figure irreconcilable with Yeshua. That is what is so facinsting about Christianity as it spread among Hellinistic Roman Empire - so many found the ancient Hebrew deity as a very off-putting, even repulsive figure (Marcion doesn't hold back at all in that regard)
@Me-hf4ii10 ай бұрын
@@TheGuiltsOfUsso the Council of Jerusalem was wrong? Jesus most beloved apostle, John, or renounced the idea of radical Torah observance as “judiazing” was wrong? Hmm… your Jesus doesn’t seem to know how to pick people very well if they got something so central so wrong so soon after His ascension.
@igorlopes758910 ай бұрын
@@Me-hf4iiYou ignore that there is a middle position between judaizers and marcionites/gnostics. That position is that the God of the OT is good and that He established a New Covenant in which the jewish-specific parts of the Halakhah are declared to be fulffilled by Christ and not necessary to follow anymore. This was the position at the Jerusalem Council, they deemed the God of the OT to be good and yet didn't believe the Halakhah was still binding
@brandonrichmond47112 жыл бұрын
I just did a paper for one of my religion classes on Gnostic literature with Valentinian cosmology at the center. It was really fun, excited for this video.
@PhDTony_original2 жыл бұрын
I recently read a translation of the Gospel of Truth and had immense difficulty understanding what the authors meant by "spirit" and "soul". This presentation helped a lot.
@ANDROLOMA2 жыл бұрын
Was the Gospel of Truth among the trove at Nag Hammadi?
@PhDTony_original2 жыл бұрын
@@ANDROLOMA Yes, it survives as a Coptic text from the Nag Hammadi trove now stored in Cairo's Coptic Museum. Edit: there are other sources - the translation I read claimed this is the most complete version.
@ANDROLOMA2 жыл бұрын
@@PhDTony_original Today, I learned something new. Thank you, Tony.
@eternalism8274 Жыл бұрын
i extracted the 3-tier scheme of Body/ Soul/ Spirit from Pagels' first two books (Johannine, Pauline writings). Soul = exoteric freewillist moral-agency thinking; Spirit = esoteric no-free-will thinking (non-branching block universe altered state experience)
@shawnboisclair36962 жыл бұрын
As always, an interesting analysis of this religous system. Real history, people and their beliefs are always far more interesting and diverse than we tend to believe because of our prism of experience and beliefs.
@NinaR17382 жыл бұрын
It’s interesting and diverse always, it’s not our faith that obstructs that but often time the privilege many have that they do not feel the need to listen or acknowledge others
@brandonfrench93792 жыл бұрын
I am overwhelmingly thankful to see Dr. Ismo Dunderberg and his research mentioned. He has provided exceptional insight into the Valentinians, and his book "Beyond Gnosticism" is a must read for anyone looking for in-depth information into the School of Valentinus.
@dustindavis552 жыл бұрын
It’s too bad his books are so expensive. One as much as 270 dollars on Amazon. Where can one find more affordable copies?
@brandonfrench93792 жыл бұрын
@@dustindavis55 I agree that his books are expensive, but I "Beyond Gnosticism" is worth the $60. I don't know of a way to get the books for a lower price, I wish I did though.
@commenter33262 жыл бұрын
@@dustindavis55 Libgen.
@BonJoviBeatlesLedZep2 жыл бұрын
@@brandonfrench9379 There are subreddits where one can obtain knowledge of dark arts in order to procure precious and expensive artefacts such as this book. That's all I shall say.
@eternalism8274 Жыл бұрын
i looked up the book Beyond Gnosticism and I was surprised that Amazon says i have it 🤷♂️🤯 and i bought it used in 2013, shipped 2014, paid $15. i hope i found it enlightening 😞 i assume i have read Michael Wms Against 'Gnosticism'; found a pdf of his previous 1977 dissertation revision The Immovable Raec the other day on the theme of Stability ($160)
@jftucker2 жыл бұрын
I've really struggled to wrap my head around Valentinianism for the longest time. This was helpful.
@STho2052 жыл бұрын
The three pure forms of the universe is the most helpful part of this presentation, especially tying it to the letters attributed to Paul untranslated from the oldest Greek.
@w01972 жыл бұрын
I love your videos on first century Christianity. Very different from what my culty Baptist bible college taught me lol This time in church history is wild.
@FrJWF2 жыл бұрын
This is one of the most cogent explanations of Valentinian cosmology/theology I've ever heard. Not an easy thing to tease out to make understandable to a modern audience! Kudos!
@jasper37062 жыл бұрын
I just started reading surviving Valentinian texts yesterday! What great timing
@Arcanismedia2 жыл бұрын
Valentinian theology heavily influences my own spiritual beliefs. I appreciate this video.
@joannebrown6540 Жыл бұрын
Especially regarding Yahweh, in my belief. He is not The Father of Yeshua.
@bobSeigar Жыл бұрын
@@joannebrown6540 yshu = 'May his name be obliterated'
@igorlopes758910 ай бұрын
@@joannebrown6540The earliest christian writtings suggest otherwise. I would trust the earliest christians, who wrote the OT, over the late second century christians who wrote the gnostic gospels and books
@dddboom2 жыл бұрын
Wow. Extremely interesting, wish I knew so much more about the various "Gnostic" beliefs such a shame so much is lost to time or undiscovered.
@DBCisco2 жыл бұрын
and ignored as well misrepresented.
@bobSeigar2 жыл бұрын
And intentionally suppressed
@TimeWaster_Elite2 жыл бұрын
@@bobSeigar bingo.
@tehufn2 жыл бұрын
Thankfully died out. They were often, as it says in the beginning of the video, polytheistic. Gnosticism is the oldest Christian heresy, even predating Christianity (hence its polytheism). It is of Greece, not of Jerusalem.
@bobSeigar2 жыл бұрын
@@tehufn Christianity came out of Rome, not Jerusalem. Also, Gnostics are a much more diverse set of groups than you are attempting to paint them as.
@wompa702 жыл бұрын
Being in these early groups must have been fascinating. Not only do you have people raised Jewish you have people coming from a Greek and Roman background.
@Noizzed4 ай бұрын
And also, simply being in a world of which nobody knew it's limits, it's physical rules, the reason for many natural phenomenons to exist. You're in a group of people from all places trying to figure out the spiritual nature of existence.
@Carlos-ln8fd2 жыл бұрын
Such an amazing video. Something that fascinates me about history of religion is how it helps us understand the people who lived in the past, their beliefs, ideas and practices.
@0sireion2 жыл бұрын
I love these deep dives. You keep the pace moving at exactly the speed I wish to imbibe it all. This is so helpful in understanding a variety of very disparate philosophies. Thank you.
@AntonBryl2 жыл бұрын
The "Angel of the Great/Mightly Council" title is very familiar to the Eastern Orthodox tradition. It is apparently how one of the bits of the famous "Wonderful, Counseller, The mighty God..." passage in Isaiah is translated in Septuagint and, consequently, in the translations dependent on it (e.g. into Church Slavonic).
@Imladris-lm3bo2 жыл бұрын
Such a fantastic channel, never ceases to amaze me. One day you should do a video about the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom - I would be fascinated to hear you talk about it.
@Svartalf142 жыл бұрын
Thanks, I'm definitely no scholar of christianity, and even less of early christian movements and philosophies, but you do help me make more sense of what little I know.
@binutil Жыл бұрын
the lead guitarist nailed the van halen solo near perfectly.. hats off..
@byronomboy2 жыл бұрын
The idea of bride, bridegroom, bridal chamber, etc. is very familiar to those practicing meditation that conveys the esoteric meaning of the bride (soul), uniting to the Bridegroom (God, Ocean, etc.) for eternal salvation.
@TheGuiltsOfUs2 жыл бұрын
Rabbi Yeshua knew nothing of such pagan ideas
@mudgetheexpendable2 жыл бұрын
My hylic self was *riveted* by the TriTrac and all these fascinating details about how very complex the roots of christian religion really is. I appreciate your clarity and erudition.
@amjadkchy2 жыл бұрын
I went and re-watched your 2015 video on gnosticism and it was really interesting to see the consistency of your arguments and the evolution of your style. Out of curiosity, do you ever revisit your old videos, and how do you feel about them?
@ReligionForBreakfast2 жыл бұрын
Some of them hold up. Generally I cringe at the production quality.
@sorceresque6472 жыл бұрын
@@ReligionForBreakfast To be able to look back at your past and see its deficiencies is a sign that you're improving in your craft! It's been great to see the organic evolution of your presentation style. Art is full of malformed first attempts, but we aim to love them all anyway. 😊 But judging by your trajectory, I can see great things ahead!
@Napoleonic_S2 жыл бұрын
@@ReligionForBreakfast Man, can you teach us where did these gnosticism cosmology come from? Was it based on Jewish or pagan ideas? Or both? And why ultimately the orthodox Christianity rejected those cosmology ideas?
@TheMrcassina2 жыл бұрын
@@ReligionForBreakfast you can be funny too
@bromponie73302 жыл бұрын
The Valentinians were also early sources that link the fourth Gospel to the disciple John as author. This testifies to the antiquity of the tradition, being shared by those of multiple schools of thought.
@Ancipital_2 жыл бұрын
All one has to do is to read St. Iranaeus' Against Heresies to see that yes, Jesus had quite the impact and had many thinkers scrambling from left to right trying to make sense of what had transpired.
@ohamatchhams2 жыл бұрын
@@Ancipital_ Nay, one has to see the successes of the growth, spread and strengthening of Islam which is the fulfilment of any genuine prophecy, regardless from the Nicene to "Gnostic" sources of Christianity and any other religions Nicene Christianity, especially it's Western variants, is already a failure at even protecting it's authenticity, whether of being "genuine"/"orthodox", "universal"/"catholic", lutheran, nestorian, calvinist, evangelical and any other labels which deemed to be failures after centuries of corruptions
@FlyingAlfredoSaucer2 жыл бұрын
Are you ever planning on making a video about the Didache? Also thanks for this video Valentinians are a group I've always found interesting.
@ReligionForBreakfast2 жыл бұрын
Yeah I'd really like to. I've always been fascinated by the Didache, and it'd be a nice follow-up to the Shepherd of Hermas video.
@CJ-uk1rt2 жыл бұрын
@@ReligionForBreakfast thanks for making a video on the Shepard of Hermas. I had no idea it existed. I've learnt so much from your channel.
@Nick.T.A2 жыл бұрын
@@ReligionForBreakfast Please do! I have always wanted to know more about the Didache
@PaulClermont2 жыл бұрын
strange i just learned that the Didache exists yesterday- in addition to the rest of the "Apostolic Father" writings (Letters of Clement, Ignatius, Polycarp, etc) Literally about to buy Holmes' compilation
@samlatin89332 жыл бұрын
@@PaulClermont is there an amazon link to this
@gracaendre30922 жыл бұрын
I've been watching so much RFB I think I might be addicted xD Please never stop making videos, this is the best channel out there!
@matthewcarter25002 жыл бұрын
Thank you, Andrew! This is wonderful as always! And it comes during the beginning of Orthodox Holy Week, where we have the Bridegroom Matins services, which also use the bridal chamber imagery! I don't know if you planned that, but it works out very well!
@CJ-uk1rt2 жыл бұрын
so glad to see you're back!
@richardglady30092 жыл бұрын
That was an immensely deep presentation. Thank you very much for all your research and work putting this video together. I love your perspective, so often forgotten, that “Gnostics” were Christians.
@marshamunger6004 Жыл бұрын
Your summaries are always simple enough to stir the reader's interest. Thanks.
@minasoliman2 жыл бұрын
The fact that Valentinus almost became bishop of Rome is worth making the video about him/his belief system!
@chiron14pl2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for adding some good detail and, more importantly, a useful context in which this particular node fits in the web of beliefs and practices in early Christianity
@termsofusepolice2 жыл бұрын
The Valentinians had a method they used to rescue humans from suffocating, spiritual darkness and bring them into the light. They called it the Hylic Maneuver.
@ANDROLOMA2 жыл бұрын
Heimlich?
@MoonChild-jq2dm Жыл бұрын
LOL
@NicolasPrince-j8k Жыл бұрын
Yeah but for it to work you have to make sure the banking cartel doesn’t shut your life in America down first cause they are so great and kind and care all about our sons
@orangemanbad Жыл бұрын
Hahaha. That was hilarious
@fremiloant1186 Жыл бұрын
@@NicolasPrince-j8k Such things dont exist, you're delusional
@jackkendall64202 жыл бұрын
yet another certified banger from our main man
@mikeambs2 жыл бұрын
I've already watched this episode twice - can't wait to share it with others!
@fiendmajestic61342 жыл бұрын
Fantastic job as always. Thank you for all your hard work!
@thornsilverhollysong17152 жыл бұрын
"Think like an ancient physicist!" Thanks, that's my new motto
@steveng8251 Жыл бұрын
I really enjoy your seeming non bias delivery of facts in a well rounded measure. Thank you, I wish I could support you but I am a pleab
@ketsuekikumori91452 жыл бұрын
"How many people who could say 'you can measure a soul on a scale'?" There is at least 1 man I can think of. Duncan MacDougall and his 21 grams experiment.
@ethhein54602 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much i love your videos especially on Christian History, Gnosticism, and Apocryphal texts.
@SobekLOTFC2 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@SobekLOTFC2 жыл бұрын
Yooo new video! Lore is happening For those wanting to learn more, there's a great recent book about these groups called Found Christianities by Dr M David Litwa.
@christopherdiedrich402 жыл бұрын
This video is great! I really thought I pneuma faith pretty well, but, this was very enlightening!
@BlastBoyX2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for perpetuating a scholarly understanding of this elusive material.
@isaacleillhikar45662 жыл бұрын
Hi. Gnostics is used by Ireneas in his Book against hérésies. Its title once was "Countering what is falsly called Knowlege (Gnostia)" quoting Paul in the Bible.
@ericconard77182 жыл бұрын
Really really enjoyed this presentation! Extremely enlightening. I’m looking forward to going through the rest of your material. 🙂
@Taco07182 жыл бұрын
Love to see an episode on Ebionites and their modern spiritual descendants the Talmidi Jews
@turbopowergt2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this! When I was looking into this subject 20+ years ago there was really only Pagel’s Gnostic Gospels commonly available and just a smattering of work providing context to the Nag Hammadi codices.
@JonathanMichael2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the informative video sir. It does makes me wonder how would the modern world be like if these “Gnostic” branches survived. The early church fathers wrote way too many polemics against their gnostic opponents but none of the works they antagonize survived which is kinda disappointing. I think even the church fathers Origen (homily on Luke), Epiphanius (Panarion), and Jerome (commentary on Matthew) wrote commentaries about the first chapter of Luke discussing about the “many who have taken account” pertaining to these heretical works of Basilides, Cerinthus, Merinthus, and other non canonical gospels.
@funnyWOMAB7048 Жыл бұрын
Honestly people who have similar beliefs to the gnostics have continuously re-emerged so many times I'd argue it wouldn't be much different as it is now. I mean if the valentinians survived id imagine they'd be like the modern johannites or the ecclesia gnostica in France and the us, or the Cathars or the bogomils, or Carl Jung fans ig
@barrymoore4470 Жыл бұрын
@@funnyWOMAB7048 Gnosticism essentially strikes me as Christianity infused with liberal helpings of Platonic idealism. Platonic thought is foundational to Western philosophy, so I agree that Gnostic survival would have left the world looking much as we have it today, and explains why variations of Gnostic thought recur throughout Western history.
@juiceytee Жыл бұрын
Ur explanations are so succinct. Can I suggest that you slow down all speech by 10% and increase your pause time by same after every period. Nmb but honestly think it’ll work ❤
@sem_identitificador2 жыл бұрын
Please make a video on Pierre Teilhard de Chardin the jesuit priest and paleontologist who tried to unite darwinian evolutionary theory with christian catholic cosmology creating a whole new thing: the omega point
@hedgehog31802 жыл бұрын
I kinda like that you start with 7 minutes of disclaimers, goes to show how complex the field is.
@joelkupiainen67592 жыл бұрын
I had the pleasure of attending an introduction to exegetics class taught by Dunderberg and his colleague Juha Pakkala, where Pakkala would teach the Old Testament and Dunderberg the New Testament. He's very inspiring as a lecturer.
@lausenteternidad2 жыл бұрын
A friend of mine is reading about these things because she believes in them and wants to learn and put them in practice. She really appreciates these videos.
@yosh30582 жыл бұрын
Just tell her to choose her sources carefully. A lot of ancient Christian writings have been destroyed, altered, or slandered if they did not conform to the more popular Christian ideologies. A lot of info you might find about these groups doesn't accurately reflect the actual beliefs and practices if these early Christians.
@tafazzi-on-discord2 жыл бұрын
Look into catholic apologists like Jimmy akin, both of you.
@ayushshukla29172 жыл бұрын
HI brother! Thanks for the video. One question- Will you make videos explaining Philosophies of Hinduism in future. There are many dharmic philosophies with many people explaining in different ways. Would love to listen your perspective on them.
@ReligionForBreakfast2 жыл бұрын
Yes, I am currently in the early stages of producing an Intro to Hinduism series. Two episodes are already written. You can expect the series to launch in a few months.
@ayushshukla29172 жыл бұрын
@@ReligionForBreakfast Thanks buddy❤
@evereststevens70342 жыл бұрын
This is very interesting. Thankyou for presenting this. Its important to know stuff like this. More people should i think...know this stuff
@jeremyg72612 жыл бұрын
Know what? That Christians are just a stupid cult like every other stupid cult? I agree
@kevincason53092 жыл бұрын
great content and delivery. I'm wondering if you use similar terms like "myths" when referring to modern or orthodox christianity and how you parse one individuals cosmic conclusions as non-myth compared to anothers.
@marktwain3682 жыл бұрын
Another fascinating look at Early Christian belief! Each of your lectures, Andrew, is filled with investigative zeal and enrichment that stimulate our curiosity and reflection on what our beliefs are based on.
@aquafieldrocks2 жыл бұрын
“…the Valentinians were not making this stuff out of thin pneuma” …well played!
@peaceandlove5214 Жыл бұрын
I really love your videos and the way you analyse subjects.
@erinpilla10 ай бұрын
If this strand of Christianity (i.e. Gnostic Christianities) was the one that survived to this day, I definitely would have remained Christian
@thenightwatchman15982 ай бұрын
really sounds no different than calvanism and just as elitist.
@erinpilla2 ай бұрын
@@thenightwatchman1598 Hmmmmm gnosticism isn't that, definite like Calvinism IMO. The former emphasizes the self as the liberator. The latter says you got no f'n choice
@thenightwatchman15982 ай бұрын
@@erinpilla that "only a select few people will be saved" spirit is still there though.
@erinpilla2 ай бұрын
@@thenightwatchman1598 but they're not "selected" compared to Calvinism. In gnosticism, the thing is those who see it, see it
@AIagremm2 жыл бұрын
I was hoping for a video about the Valentinians! Delightful.
@brianseiler97502 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this video. I'm personally fascinated by early Christian "heresies" - particularly "gnostic" ones - but I've always wondered one thing. Did this cosmology come from somewhere? It seems awfully complex to have just been conjured from nothing by one or a few authors. I mean, it's not unheard of (see the cosmology of Scientology), but given how much of what you find in Old Testament cosmology you can see as related to other nearby faiths (in some cases preceding all the way back to PIE religion, with things like the construction of Yahweh as a storm god in conflict with Leviathan, in keeping with the Chaoskampf), is there some other "pagan" source from whence the Sethian and Valentenian cosmologies developed? I think I understand some of the Neoplatonic influences, but I can't find any non-Christian belief systems featuring cosmologies similar to the sort of complex structure you see in something like Sethianism. Is there any literature that I could read that would shed some light on this particular aspect? I would love to see an actual video to help explain it in ley terms, but if that's not in the cards, are there any scholars who have written on this particular subject?
@PaintedHoundie2 жыл бұрын
Gnostic cosmology is a combination of subverted abrahamic systems and greatly inspired by existing greek systems. Lot of platonic concepts. Things like the demiurge, concepts of archons, the pleroma, the Sophia, etc. are from greek beliefs prior to. Some concepts are in the new testament as well, but in terminology, and not in a literal sharing of the same concept. like the pleroma is used in the new testament but not in reference to a realm above the creator god.
@ANDROLOMA2 жыл бұрын
Dr. Ehrman needs your suggestion as another book topic.
@jeremyg72612 жыл бұрын
That guy is a loser
@straightupanarg62262 жыл бұрын
If I'm not mistaken, the idea of "emnations of the divine" (but not the specifics here) begins with Plotinus' interpretation of Plato and continues through the later neoplatonists.
@ButSeriouslyThough2 жыл бұрын
In part, it simply elaborates on the cosmic pattern found in orthodox Christianity: in orthodox Christianity, Satan is the ruler of this world but God comes in the person of Jesus Christ to reclaim what is His, and the dualistic Gnostic cosmologies simply elaborated on this. In part, it is a sort of Platonic syncretism. And in part, it is, in my opinion, based on legitimate confusion regarding what Paul meant in his epistles; a confusion that lasts even to this day, as you'll see with the disagreements between Protestantism and Catholicism/Orthodoxy on what Paul believed concerning the Law and the relationship between faith and works (although we see from the writings of Clement of Alexandria that the Gnostic vs. Orthodox dispute was rather about faith and knowledge). I mean, it's not hard to read Galatians and see how Paul could have easily been interpreted as having the same kind of cosmology as the Valentinians.
@dangelamarx80 Жыл бұрын
That epitaph gave me goosebumps. Sooooooooo beautiful.
@theholyschois74772 жыл бұрын
I thought this video was about the imperial dynasty of the late Roman empire lol- Great video as always although I really get confused when Christology starts mentioning concepts such as Gods natures, essence and substance. Like the disputes of chalcedonian and miaphysitism.
@jlstudart261083 Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for this channel. I have learn so much here.... I can only be greatfull...
@ActiveAdvocate12 жыл бұрын
The Bride of Christ imagery is still used in Catholicism. I don't know if any other sect uses it, but when I was still a Catholic, I heard the Catholic church referred to as the "Bride of Christ" all the time. THAT trope is nothing new, either. Eros and Psyche, anyone? It's the most "Christian" of pre-Christian myths.
@dimitartodorov48262 жыл бұрын
The Bride of Christ is used in protestant as well as eastern orthodox churches. Do you know why? Because it comes directly from scripture.
@anti-skub21642 жыл бұрын
Very excited as you near closer and closer to covering Sethianism.
@ReligionForBreakfast2 жыл бұрын
Oh yes, we'll be covering Sethianism ASAP.
@pathkeepers2 жыл бұрын
Naming my next dog or child Pseudo-Tertullian
@matthewbittenbender91912 жыл бұрын
Something to add, is that the belief in the demiurge and the aeons, gives rise to the innate divinity of man; that the soul is part of the highest aeon in which it seeks to return if enlightened enough. There's an Elegance in that which I think is a great lesson for humanity even today.
@hfranklin20094 ай бұрын
I really enjoyed this! Thank you.
@hermanhale92582 жыл бұрын
There's nothing wrong with calling them by their founder's name. It's a helpful label. Makes no difference if some ancient writer hated them or not.
@a_lucientes2 жыл бұрын
That was really interesting, thanks.
@owenkelly29402 жыл бұрын
I was raised Southern and Independent Baptist. The bridal imagery is still very common among them.
@ronaldm.71012 жыл бұрын
How is it? With what purpose?
@grimble45642 жыл бұрын
@@ronaldm.7101 It might be similar to how Catholicism still uses this imagery too. The Church is often referred to as the bride of Christ, and so becoming baptized into the Church is supposed to place you in an intimate and binding relationship with God.
@NigelJackson2 жыл бұрын
'The Angel of Great Counsel' is a title given to Christ in the NT. The Valentinians were originally not distinct from primitive Christianity but rather an inner dimension of esoterism within the early Church with their secret sacramental initiations of Apolytrosis and the Bridal Chamber for the Pneumatic Christians as well as the Psychic Christians. The Valentinian categorization of Pneumatic, Psychic and Hylic types of human is similar to the Divyabhava, Virabhava and Pashubhava in Indian Tantrik traditions.
@lormanias2 жыл бұрын
What about more about ancient Egypt? Ra? Anubis? The Ankh? The Uas? The Djed?
@Autists-Guide2 жыл бұрын
Best yet. Thank you.
@michaelblizzard31322 жыл бұрын
It is interesting to me the seemingly similar viewpoints of the Valentinians and Greeks in regards to the Father and Jesus, and that of Cronus and Zeus. Is there evidence that Valentinus may have been influenced by Greek philosophy in developing his theology? Or, perhaps Roman theology influencing Valentinus?
@STho2052 жыл бұрын
In reading Valintinian and Marcionic texts as well as some of the Sethian Gnostic gospels...it seems that these portions of the faith were introduced to the ministry and ressurection of Jesus, but without having any strong basis in Semetic Hebrew traditions or theology. Almost as if Jesus just happened to live in Judea and be surrounded by secular Jewish apostles, born of a young Jewish maid. The writers seem to be marrying The Christ to their own religions and post Plato cosmology and society. That the Jews were not the plan of the ultimate G-d but tricked children of the lesser material creator demigod, just as the pagan pantheon worshippers were tricked by tales of the Olympians or Ra's lesser court of nature gods. The Gospel of Judas and Gosoel of Mary Magdalena even show a writer's contempt for the Jews of the era Tricky stuff. One often assumes the Nicholas Trinitarians to be very eurpoean, but they do embrace judiasm with much more reverence and see Jesus as the final step of human enlightenment started by Moses and The Prophets.
@michaelblizzard31322 жыл бұрын
@@STho205 Thank you. Appreciate your time in addressing my questions. So much information.
@tafazzi-on-discord2 жыл бұрын
@@STho205 >G-d cringe.
@STho2052 жыл бұрын
@@tafazzi-on-discord antisemite Mr Amazing? Just curious.
@tafazzi-on-discord2 жыл бұрын
@@STho205 There's no reason to do that, in the Old Testament Jews use "El" all the time. "El" is the general term for God, since it's also used to refer to Baal, it has the same function as the word "God" does in english. "God" is not the name if the Trinity, but the Trinity is God, and the true God, that doesn't mean that if i began speaking Hebrew I should censor "El" to "*l" or some other idiocy like that.
@jwoowoo_ Жыл бұрын
Alright you got me. Subscribed. You are very complete and concise.
@Flamarius2 жыл бұрын
The Valentinians weren't making this stuff up out of thin pneuma 😂😂😂
@ReligionForBreakfast2 жыл бұрын
Show up for the religious studies scholarship. Stay for the gnostic-themed dad jokes.
@samrevlej9331 Жыл бұрын
@@ReligionForBreakfast You know you've peaked as a specific nerd culture when you have inside dad jokes.
@dbentleyto95 Жыл бұрын
Facinating talk. Thank you so much for this
@bdwon2 жыл бұрын
You say that the hylic, psychic, pneumatic categories of human are derived from Paul. Was Paul influenced by Plato's tripartite soul, or the three categories of human, i.e., gold, silver, bronze?
@renatlottiepilled2 жыл бұрын
new Religion for Breakfast video LETS GOOO love to know more about gnosticism
@Carlos-ln8fd2 жыл бұрын
I know this is a weird idea but could you do a video on Demon Slayer? The characters in that show practice a form of Buddhism I had no idea existed. They often talk about heaven and hell, gods and Buddhas in plural. I don't know if it's the same type of religion you've mentioned in previous videos about Japan or a form of Buddhism unique to the time period the story is set in. Still, all your videos are great.
@jeremyg72612 жыл бұрын
You don’t know much about Buddhism then, I don’t know what to tell you. Educate yourself?
@Carlos-ln8fd2 жыл бұрын
@@jeremyg7261 Always happy to learn new things
@integrationalpolytheism2 жыл бұрын
Very interesting introductory video, well done. The quote at 8:30 made me think of a question I hadn’t considered before. Did all early Christians subscribe to the creation accounts in Genesis 1-3, even if it was from a non literal perspective? Were there Christian schools of thought that either rejected Genesis 1-3 or were even unaware of it? I’d love to know what information we have on this.
@JamesRichardWiley2 жыл бұрын
Jesus believed in Adam and Eve and the talking serpent.
@integrationalpolytheism2 жыл бұрын
@@JamesRichardWiley hmm, I'm not convinced that's the case though, necessarily. Just because Jesus mentioned this or that narrative from the Tanakh doesn't mean he necessarily believed that was literal history. And if Jesus was the all knowing son of god, then it would be hard to argue he believed in Genesis 1-11 as history since it diverges so much from the pre-history that the real life evidence suggests. However I'm not asking about what a hypothetical Jesus thought, I'm asking about the real life early christian sects, communities etc. First of all, were all jews biblical literalists at that point (or not), and did all early christians carry that doctrine over to their own faith, or not? Obviously there must have been some augmentation to the story at least for some of them, in order to make room for the demiurge etc in the story, and other elements such as Lilith, so i wondered if there's any evidence that jews at this time or early christians actually viewed the Genesis and even maybe the Exodus and Joshua accounts as allegory rather than history.
@ANDROLOMA2 жыл бұрын
My belief, perhaps erroneous, is that Christianity is a heresy from Judaism. As a heresy, it was desperate for validity by appending itself to an original tribal superstition which held prior acceptance. Which meant, of course, adapting that superstition's earlier written dictums and molding certain prophecies into predictions of an arrived messiah, instead of an impending messiah.
@integrationalpolytheism2 жыл бұрын
That would align with current Jewish thought, I think, but heresy or not, I wonder if those early Christian groups took Genesis literally. I have heard that young earth creationism is a fairly young movement and I have noticed the Jewish tendency to use scripture as allegory while still talking about it as if it were history. Christians seem to assume that Jews were or are biblical literalists but if they weren’t, in Roman Judea, then maybe some Christian groups weren’t either. Was this one of the types of heresy that the early church was keen to stamp out?
@gnosticsabaton49752 жыл бұрын
I'm Gnostic and very happy to be one. The Nag Hammadi Scriptures is my holy Bible.
@cheri2382 жыл бұрын
Glad I found this channel thank you.❤️
@dangelamarx802 жыл бұрын
That Poem at the beginning was sooooo beautiful. One time I had a vision with my eyes open, it was the strongest vision I ever had. It was like I got transported to the throne of God but when it was my turn to stand before him the light was so strong and so bright and it was coupled with this indescribable sense of Majesty, reverence and the deepest fear Ive ever felt. So when I hear beautiful language to describe Gods light and I recognize the yearning to be close to the feet of the all attractive…. It just (sigh) I feel like someone else gets it.
@stankozubenko85202 жыл бұрын
!
@albertconstantine54322 жыл бұрын
Super, as usual. Thank you. And is the unbuttoned collar an intentional branding look? Cool.
@justsammy20232 жыл бұрын
As a Cathar, hearing people discus gnostic christianity is awesome!
@AatxeUrrutia-ph9ty3 ай бұрын
awesome unbiased video! ty !
@crush30952 жыл бұрын
I think there was a 70s or 80s Gnostic movement in South America like a cult, my parents were part of it, my middle name is the same as the leader's >__< luckily my parents were just dumb hippies so they moved from cult to cult before getting lazy and abandoning all haha