Key takeaway: Jedi are thaumaturges. Also, subscribe to ESOTERICA: kzbin.info/www/bejne/enbadaukYtaki6s
@TheEsotericaChannel2 жыл бұрын
Wonderful to work together on this collaboration, Andrew! Your channel has been such an inspiration for me and I'm just so thankful for your trailblazing work making religious studies accessible on this platform. Hope to hang out at the AAR/SBL this fall!
@nathangibbons94922 жыл бұрын
Is Genesis 1 a polytheist creation story? As opposed to Genesis 2?
@TulioG2 жыл бұрын
It would be interesting to see your opinion on Richard Carrier, he's got some very good points about Jesus not being a real person at all.
@Benni7772 жыл бұрын
And Yoda is the Master Thaumaturge!🙏🏼🤭
@Zevelyon2 жыл бұрын
@@TheEsotericaChannel Luke Woodham repented. Have you?
@merrittanimation77212 жыл бұрын
"Jesus performs miracles remotely" Jesus's Zoom based miracle service.
@paulastalas86912 жыл бұрын
I also thought of online activities when i heard that. Funny how now remotely has come to mean this more and more.
@lj22652 жыл бұрын
Wouldn't even need Zoom to do it really lol Energy workers do long distance healing by just thinking of the person.
@MariaMartinez-ti6ko2 жыл бұрын
it's called the iN-turn-ET~
@merrittanimation77212 жыл бұрын
@A Baker Of course not, I was joking. Obviously a divine being like him uses Skype /s
@justinwatson15102 жыл бұрын
Don’t give ideas to the Prosperity Gospel people. Please.
@undertheredhood03232 жыл бұрын
Actually, Jesus was the first Stand User
@SobekLOTFC2 жыл бұрын
💯
@caelebfox212 жыл бұрын
His stand is called Holy Spirit
@nothereanymore39412 жыл бұрын
Lol at people in the replies that are not in on the joke
@nunyabiznes332 жыл бұрын
Jojosus?
@howarddewing66172 жыл бұрын
speen
@SmartStart242 жыл бұрын
Idk but for some reason referring to magicians as “ritual specialists” tickle me. Like my first job out of high school I was a “customer service associate” instead of a “cashier” 😂
@Demetrius4162 жыл бұрын
You was a cashier I assume
@user-realahhnikka Жыл бұрын
Supervisor of monetary flow
@MrArtVein Жыл бұрын
Financial Computations Associate
@pcenero Жыл бұрын
Ambulatory Currency Receptacle
@BoBandits Жыл бұрын
I'm late but a 'ritual' is what archaeologists may call an unknown/lost practice. Like 'we don't know why "this" was done a certain way'..
@brettwong-o7n Жыл бұрын
Jesus: My son, is this your card? Dude: My God how did he know!?
@lolly98042 жыл бұрын
My dad grew up in Fiji. And used to tell stories about people who used to go to church on Sunday, but then go into forest at night to do magic. So of course the way he would tell it, gave me the impression that Fiji was chock full of evil wizards. Though in reality they were most likely just double dipping in religion, like in a lot of colonised lands. Still made my childhood feel very magicial thinking there's Islands full of secretive spell casters.
@didack14192 жыл бұрын
That's a cool anecdote.
@HesderOleh2 жыл бұрын
In Europe it was the priests who were involved in magick and necromany and such. They were the educated and literate who kept up those traditions.
@enzocompanbadillo53652 жыл бұрын
I am from the Yucatan Península. I have and acquantaince who is a x'men (pronounced sh-men) a mayan shaman. He is also a very devout catholic who does voluntary work for a local Franciscan monastery and attends mass every sunday. I asked him if the priest has any issue with his "pagan" side and he answered that not only he doesnt but also sometimes recommends him to people in need of "healing". Also, one of his nephews is interested in becoming a priest.
@JustMeRosh2 жыл бұрын
I'm born and raised in Fiji and I can surely confirm that double dipping in religion, is in fact a common practice here.
@lolly98042 жыл бұрын
@@JustMeRosh Yeah it's pretty much the same in New Zealand. As you have like the Ratana Church which is a blend of Māori spirituality/beliefs and Christianity. I once went on a forestry program. Where they rolled out an elderly tohunga to warn us all about ghosts in the forest for like two hours. He even said that if you're Christian to say a prayer to your god, if you don't know the right Karakia to say. In the event you run into one.
@FupaDoncic2 жыл бұрын
“You’re a wizard, Jesus.” -John the Baptist
@LadyGreySpacePirate2 жыл бұрын
Lol
@druid1392 жыл бұрын
"Ah, John; you're off your feckin' head!" -JC
@Manormouse-042 жыл бұрын
💀❤️🔥
@hackman669 Жыл бұрын
This is no ordinary mortal. This man must be a god!!!✌
@BodhiPolitic Жыл бұрын
@@hackman669 John the Baptist seems not to have become a follower of Jesus. Quite telling. He likely did not accept him as messiah.
@paulastalas86912 жыл бұрын
Freelance Ritual Specialist sounds like something you can put on your resume.
@diegobermudez81022 жыл бұрын
Yeah... I suppose it is. *goes and edits resume*
@Dullrig Жыл бұрын
I cannot emphasize enough how well written this analysis is. Thanks so much for what you provide!
@onthepath501 Жыл бұрын
I agree
@electricearth1101 Жыл бұрын
This Great video has made me illiterate and now i tell people i dont need to read books because youtube lies are sufficient to put in my garbage brain.
@conanwills41547 ай бұрын
He spat on the ground and rubbed it on his eyes because it was an ancient Jewish custom to spit on the ground beside blind people to disrespect them. So to hear the spit touch the ground and believe that you'll still be healed requires enormous faith.
@scottygordon32802 жыл бұрын
I'm really impressed by this video...I feels like it's much more than just an overview of a topic or question, but is rather a deep dive into the sources with the intention of demonstrating an actual thesis that engages with the literature. In short, it's academic discourse happening on KZbin. As a grad student, I find this very exciting. Keep up the good work!
@juanausensi4992 жыл бұрын
@@MagicJesus Celsus also means: high, tall, noble, prominent, and it was a name purposely given to many kids. Some Celsuses: Aulus Cornelius Celsus (c. 25 BC - c. 50 AD), an encyclopedist best known for his medical writings Aulus Marius Celsus, a Roman senator whose career began under Nero Tiberius Julius Celsus Polemaeanus, commonly known as Celsus (ca. 45 - before ca. 120); Roman senator, consul. Ephesus Publius Juventius Celsus (AD 67- AD 130), a Roman jurist, praetor, governor, consul Tiberius Julius Candidus Marius Celsus, aka Tiberius Julius Candidus; a Roman senator who lived during the Flavian dynasty. Saint Celsus (aka Celestinus or Cellach of Armagh), 1080-1129 AD); archbishop of Armagh Celsus and Marcionilla early Christian martyrs (in the time of Diocletian); Celsus, young son of Marcionilla. Celsus, a martyr; see Nazarius and Celsus: bodies discovered by Saint Ambrose. The most famous is not a proper Celsus, but one who made their own pseudonym referring to Celsus (the first of the list): Paracelsus (above or beyond Celsus) 'Celso' is a masculine proper name in Spanish, derived from Celsus, and i bet other languages have their own descendants of Celsus Celsus as an adjective is the root of the words excel, excellent, excelence I don't know if the anty-christian Celsus existed or not, but you can't dismiss it by the name alone.
@elfarlaur2 жыл бұрын
A great video as always. As someone who studies magic and religion in the middle ages, the question of magic vs. miracle is always present, as well as the distinction between what we call magic and what people at the time did. 21:53 also Heidi Wendt was my professor for a class on Roman religion during my undergrad. She's such a great woman!
@ReligionForBreakfast2 жыл бұрын
Indeed, every time I encounter a scholar attempting to define magic, I enter their definition into a big spreadsheet. Rest assured...each and every definition is different!
@BaronEurchild2 жыл бұрын
Is that a spreadsheet you would be willing to share? If not, I understand. It is basically asking for the CliffsNotes of a large body of work that you have done.
@didack14192 жыл бұрын
@@ReligionForBreakfast What about "the supernatural" in general? Thank you for your work!
@NakedSageAstrology2 жыл бұрын
It's simpler than you think, in fact, it is what Thinks You. *RorriMaesu says useaMirroR*
@kyleflanagan9632 жыл бұрын
@@ReligionForBreakfast The way I see it, magic is that which comes from a source that could otherwise be mundane, whether that be the magician themselves or some ritual tool that is made of otherwise mundane substance. A person who sees it in a negative light would say it is subverting a mundane thing to do what it is not meant to. A person who sees it in a positive light would say that it is bringing forth a power that is meant to be there but is normally inaccessible for some reason. Miracle, on the other hand, is brought forth by something that is meant to be beyond the power of the physical world. A god, demigod, or otherwise divine being enacts miracles and that is power that they are understood to have in their most natural state. In short, Gods enact miracles because they are by nature supernatural. Wizards conduct magic because it allows a mundane thing to access the supernatural.
@Parmandur2 жыл бұрын
I mean, the curse tablet sounds slightly more practical than filing a police report.
@stuartdryer13522 жыл бұрын
I think I'm going to make one now.
@kjellcampbell76683 ай бұрын
in a way police reports are just the modern version of curse tablets… both are made out to some sort of higher power but effectively discarded into a pit
@glamourweaver9 ай бұрын
I’m recalling that the only miracles that Jewish and Greco-Roman critics of early Christianity actually disputed the entire occurrence of were the virgin birth and the resurrection. All those supernatural occurrences attributed to Jesus in between those events were culturally normative for that time and place, the only question was how it was done (see the Beelzebul accusation) not that they happened. If Jesus walked the land performing healings and exorcisms as described in the Gospels the only thing shocking and note worthy about it was him not charging people.
@jacobtesta27652 жыл бұрын
ReligionforBreakfast I love your videos! I love how unbiased and objective and critical you are when discussing your research and your work! It’s definitely something that we need to see more people doing!
@mouldyfart2 жыл бұрын
It'll be such a plot twist if we learn that he's a raging evangelical all along
@wesleywyndam-pryce5305 Жыл бұрын
unbiased would be acknowledging that its all utter nonsense and people like Jesus never existed pretty obviously.
@HelmuthGerka2 жыл бұрын
Im not religious but i love learning about anything and this was really interesting, never heard someone speaking of religious themes in this way before.
@EH23831 Жыл бұрын
Check out Useful Charts - excellent scholarly vids on religion
@robertdupree1224 Жыл бұрын
The fact that you put Harry Potter and Gandalf side by side as modern wizards is actually interesting in itself, because the nature of these two characters and their magic is very different. Harry Potter is a mostly normal human who was born with magical abilities, and is largely free to use them how he wishes. Gandalf, by contrast, is basically an angel taking on human form, sent by the other angels for a specific purpose (to rally Middle Earth against Sauron) and under significant constraints from those who sent him (specifically not to overpower the people he is trying to rally, or to fight power with power- Gandalf is reluctant to use his power directly). Both of these are called “wizards,” but the nature of their magic is very different with significant implications for how they act in the story. I guess this also demonstrates how categories that seem simple are usually fuzzier than they look
@CatManThree Жыл бұрын
I think youre putting too much thought into what was essentially generalized examples
@caseyhamm4292 Жыл бұрын
i think it’s kind of like dc vs marvel where dc is heroes being human and marvel is humans being heroes. i also think tolkien’s soft magic system is more bible-like, as it truly does feel like gandalf is performing miracles instead of his magic being just a mechanic within the world like hp
@Humphriestess33 Жыл бұрын
You forget Gandalf died and was returned . . .
@leftfieldmine Жыл бұрын
Harry has the magic of the heart as well as Gandalf .. both are rebellious fools full of compassion
@Cat_Woods Жыл бұрын
Originally, in the Hobbit, Gandalf was your first kind of wizard. He didn't become an angelic being until Tolkien incorporated his other mythology into the tale.
@labinsky Жыл бұрын
you come to the same exact conclusion one of my friends is arguing in her thesis and you cite her thesis advisor, who was also one of my profs in undergrad! stumbling upon this video is so so cool
@Kai-pn6dn7 ай бұрын
thats actually awesome
@the_purple_mage2 жыл бұрын
Jesus had to use material components like most spell casters, but as a Divine Soul sorcerer, he also had access to metamagics that could allow him to cast without components, or perhaps at a range beyond the normal range of the spells, assuming of course he had either the sorcery points available or the spells slots available to convert TO sorcery points.
@anchorthesun34382 жыл бұрын
Or you know , he’s God and decides to use his creation in order to enact his miracles
@the_purple_mage2 жыл бұрын
@@anchorthesun3438 /facepalm
@ethanjacobrosca78332 жыл бұрын
Well I would like to see a video from RFB about religion in DnD.
@enriquepenanieto4398 Жыл бұрын
Magic isnt real
@enriquepenanieto4398 Жыл бұрын
“The Church has no reason to seek out or persecute any witches because their powers do not exist” - St Augustine
@dudethatsnotok73342 жыл бұрын
I really appreciate how carefully you define terms. Helps to understand the journey of your research, and avoid undue offense. Obviously important for theological discussions. Also, you've got a really nice moustache
@psychic-moon2 жыл бұрын
As a Persian familiar with Zoroastrianism, I always thought that Jesus was probably a Magi similar to Zoroaster; that is why the three wise men predicted his birth. Magi in Persia were actually people with knowledge in philosophy and science as well as metaphysic and not sorcerers. Sorcery is forbidden in Zoroastrianism.
@paracletus3166 Жыл бұрын
Salam khoobin?
@strangerinastrangeland6865 Жыл бұрын
So what’s the definition of sorcery in Zoroastrianism, and the bible for that matter?
@QTpatootie95 Жыл бұрын
@@strangerinastrangeland6865look it up bud
@Shahanshah.Shahin Жыл бұрын
@@strangerinastrangeland6865 Black magic
@strangerinastrangeland6865 Жыл бұрын
@@Shahanshah.Shahin yeah but actually is sorcery, it’s forbidden in the bible, so there has to be a definition for what it is, and like the commenter said forbidden in Zoroastrianism, Like is it just lying and deceiving and putting on a show to convince people you have power? Or is it a practice that actually has results?
@tghodosko7259 Жыл бұрын
You know of all the channels on KZbin about religion I really like yours the best, a lot of others seem to have bias, some a lot more than others towards subjects. You have never shown me even a hint of that. I also enjoy Esoterica. Thank you, Keep doing this brother bear, I will keep watching.
@fugithegreat2 жыл бұрын
I love your videos! This is exactly what I want from religious studies, and what I never got back when I was in school and university: scholarly, nuanced, unbiased, contextualized analysis.
@JESUS_Saves37472 жыл бұрын
Explain more pls
@joeymamba25752 жыл бұрын
@@JESUS_Saves3747 oooo Ooooo Pp O
@77XTINA2 жыл бұрын
There is no such thing as unbiased history.
@chrispy13982 жыл бұрын
I wish we'd had more youtube channels like this back when I was a student of history and religious studies! Also, really enjoyed the Star Wars clips, might not be a student anymore, but always a nerd.
@Kosovar_Chicken2 жыл бұрын
Jesus is alpha but Star Wars is soy af
@mayamayhemmusic2 жыл бұрын
describing things as 'alpha' and 'soy' is 'soy af', to use fragile masculinity terms.
@Godshonestruth Жыл бұрын
@@mayamayhemmusicagree😂
@JohnnyBarbells Жыл бұрын
I grew up around the corner from this kid who became a Black Israelite when he grew up. I was raised in the Baptist church and did a lot of Bible study, so he and I used to have long discussions about religion. I'll never forget his take on Jesus based on his learnings. He believed Jesus existed, but that he was a sorcerer. He said there were texts that talked about the lost years of Jesus, and during those lost years he travelled to India where he learned the mystical arts, and the miracles he performed when he reappeared as an adult were the result of his sorcerery. I always found this very interesting. And we had that discussion way back in the 90's. So, of course the title of this video immediately caught my attention, as I have never heard anyone else bring this up...
@michaelszczys8316 Жыл бұрын
If that were all true it would make the scripture wrong where the pharisee said that he had a demonic spirit and Jesus called them out and told them they blaspheme the Holy Spirit. Jesus really WOULD have had an evil spirit. If Jesus was just a magician then all of our faith is in vain, there is no hope of salvation, we are all doomed.
@WestSideBarson Жыл бұрын
@@michaelszczys8316he did let Solomon use a magic ring to summon and control demons. That's a fact.
@michaelszczys8316 Жыл бұрын
@@WestSideBarson where is that? I would like to see.
@ana-zb7ix Жыл бұрын
@@michaelszczys8316 The Testament of Solomon.
@ana-zb7ix Жыл бұрын
@@michaelszczys8316a.k.a Seal of Solomon. Give the Jewish Babylonian Talmud a reading too, more specifically Tractate Gittin 68: Demons and the Temple. Very interesting read, mentions the ring.
@ana-zb7ix Жыл бұрын
Thanks! Thanks to you I’m currently reading the book “Jesus the magician”. Your content is amazing.
@2Sor2Fig2 жыл бұрын
Knowing that this is one of your areas of personal interest, I've been looking forward to more expansion on this topic. Thank-you for opening my eyes to the fact that religion can be analyzed without all the extra fluff and moralizing.
@NinaR17382 жыл бұрын
Of course religion can be analyzed lol
@2Sor2Fig2 жыл бұрын
@@NinaR1738 My point is that very few people can do it from an objective, rational stand-point. Most people that talk about a religion are doing so because they're trying to sell you an idea. Religion for Breakfast does it to provide an accurate summary of what we factually know about them.
@JakobNoone2 жыл бұрын
@J Lund A connecting principle , linked to the invisible? Almost imperceptible? Something inexpressible! Science insusceptible, logic so inflexible. But acausally connectible.
@coryfehr10702 жыл бұрын
@@JakobNoone Is that a line from Mary Poppins?
@JakobNoone2 жыл бұрын
@@coryfehr1070 'Synchronicity' by The Police. :)
@ryanmunro44382 жыл бұрын
Just to comment on the first example of using mud as a means of healing, you would hear the argument from some Christians that it is reflective of a pattern of God to use physical means for spiritual benefit (ex: water used in regeneration in baptism, or bread and wine in the Eucharist). There’s also something to be said for the combination of spit/water from the Pool of Siloam (symbolizing physical and spiritual cleansing) and dirt (calling back to Adam being made from dust) being used to restore a man’s body.
@paulastalas86912 жыл бұрын
I would like to make a distinction regarding Gandalf's in-universe characterization. The word wizard is a translation of the elven word istari which are a group of imortal beings sent to help the men against Sauron. So he is more like an angel and not a mere human wizard. Tolkien makes this distinction between good forces who want to heal and protect and malevolent forces who want to opress.
@j.g.49422 жыл бұрын
To add, wizard etymologically just means 'wise one' yet wisdom can cover all knowledge and the use of it
@MariaMartinez-ti6ko2 жыл бұрын
is-star-i (?) yes, [I] is [R]eal refer to: pinned post comment section: my post was prior to watching cause: I understand you! lol ✌ in-inter: net!
@dudeistpreist57212 жыл бұрын
Yes if I remember correctly he's a spirit of good who can appear how he wants but prefers that form. Like the other wizards.
@jorgegonzalez-larramendi54912 жыл бұрын
try cs lewis
@Hollylivengood2 жыл бұрын
Jeezuz, you know you're quoting fiction to debate fiction.
@maxmickwilliams Жыл бұрын
Dissertation in every video. Incredible work!
@exterminans5 ай бұрын
A dissertation would be a series of several four hour long academic lectures. This is pop history, trivia for civilians.
@maxmickwilliams5 ай бұрын
@@exterminans thanks for your pedantry. your self-congratulatory efforts to shame a bit of hyperbolic gratitude within a stranger’s KZbin comment will help elevate us “civilians” to your intellectual level, I’m sure
@giulianodeconti42332 жыл бұрын
Excellent work! Ona side Note: Magos and mageia have positive connotation in some contexts. For example Apuleius of Madaura in his apology, frames mageia as the sacred religion of persian priests, making the distinction with goeteia ( in the interes of refuse an accusation of magic), and in some Magical Papyri, like PGM IV the ritual specialist calls himself magician, and the rite magic, framing the concept as a form of mysteric and ancient religious knowledge.
@skram1000 Жыл бұрын
Feels like it could have a good and bad connotation or attitude towards the word. Same as it has today in some instances... interesting.
@Traewing Жыл бұрын
I love it, just one correction, the Magi were not Persian, they were very African. The tale of the three wise men being from India and Persia is an Armenian retelling of the story.
@MADMACHlNE Жыл бұрын
@@Traewing Source? The Gospels don't specifically say that the wise men came from Persia-or even that there were three of them-but it does call them “magi from the East”.
@rosca_21 Жыл бұрын
@@MADMACHlNEand considering the Zoroastrian origin of the term and the Greek trope of eastern miracle-workers it's safe to assumed they were implied to be Persian if anything
@Emymagdalena2 жыл бұрын
This was so thorough! I loved it. I felt like I was in class again. I love coming to this channel and always learning something I didn’t know before.
@valritz14892 жыл бұрын
There's a bit from Dan Carlin's series on Persia that speaks to this blurred line a lot, where he says the Babylonians are so fascinating because they're meticulously scientific about things like astrology and sorcery, like if one of the tools in the physicist toolbox was a ouija board. Things that today we define as "magic" were, at the time, just The Way The World Worked. You went to someone wise, told them your problem, and they prescribed you an anti-demon talisman, cause you sounded super cursed. Sometimes it was more medicinal, sometimes it was more religious, sometimes it was political science by way of star charts. Magic is just technology that wound up not actually working.
@RelivingHistory1 Жыл бұрын
Thanks to the placebo effect, I'm sure it did help in a lot of cases!
@getahanddown Жыл бұрын
Alchemy also advanced science greatly as repeatability, note taking and method analysis were valued.
@HappyBeezerStudios Жыл бұрын
They basically went with the old system of writing stuff down. And the same mix of history and mythology also is common in old literature. There wasn't much difference between Gigamesh, who was two thirds god, riding to the edge of the world to find immortality and Paris fighting at Troy for the most beautiful woman on earth or the Imperium Romanum doing a census in the client state of Judea. But not all of these stories have equal amounts of history.
@EdgarStyles1234 Жыл бұрын
Because modern science works so well right? Gotta tow the line, the consensus, the cancelling of common sense in lieu of political correctness. Remember, there are 52+ genders, men can become women, IQ is racist, and the COVID vaxx is safe and effective.
@RedHotMessResell Жыл бұрын
I came here thinking this video was gonna sound like every Sunday school class and sermon I went to as a kid where they tell you you’re not allowed to even think that God is magic. But you are actually taking apart all the terms and types and giving a very detailed coverage of what and whatnot might be qualified as magic or good magic or black magic. Truly intrigued by this video.
@senecapickers48372 жыл бұрын
Love your channel, as well as Esoterica! Yall are among the best content creators! True Academic Scholars!
@SobekLOTFC2 жыл бұрын
Great overview- I love the early Graco-Roman art depictions of Jesus as thamaturgist and exorcist. Besides, what Jesus was doing wasn't special for first century Jewish prophets and Messiahs- note the case of Eleazar in Josephus' Antiquities book 8. In regards to the amulets, papyri, etc... I also like to point to the liturgical call and response of the "correct answers for the archons" in Sethian literature. IMHO the Gospel writers (esp. Mark) were absolutely using literary tropes of miracle work and exorcisms to display Jesus' divinity for their audience. Love Walsh's subversive biography category employed towards pharmakons like Aesop and Jesus. Besides the de facto work on this (What are the Gospels? by Burridge). Dr M David Litwa's two works on the Gospels (Iesus Deus and How the Gospels Became History) give great overviews on these topics.
@ReligionForBreakfast2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the super thanks! Good points all around. Yes, Walsh's book was super eye-opening for me.
@SobekLOTFC2 жыл бұрын
@@ReligionForBreakfast lot of it comes from Burridge IMO, but I love how her category gives more autonomy to the gospel writers as more than just dudes compiling texts and able to flex their literary muscles. Also forgot to mention Horsley's Bandits, Prophets, and Messiahs in regards to Eleazar. Still waiting with baited breath for the Litwa/Henry avengers level crossover
@sirdryden422 жыл бұрын
What I expected: “Did Jesus actually perform miracles or was he a charlatan?” What I got: “What D&D class was he?” (No offense intended, it was informative regardless)
@shannadaul64382 жыл бұрын
A Cleric dude. 😉 With Thaumaturgy, healing touch, remove curse etc. What if his background was charlatan...rather than the usual acolyte?
@danhtran6401 Жыл бұрын
If jesus was fake. The blind man would have told everyone. If Jesus didnt walk on water, he wouldn't have 2 billion followers. To think he stays up at night setting up magic tricks for the next day just to die in the end is illogical. Besides, they couldn't bring any charges against him during trial and surely being a charlatan was not one of them....
@Sharkakaka Жыл бұрын
@@shannadaul6438nah, his background was guild artisan, he was a carpenter after all.
@HappyBeezerStudios Жыл бұрын
@@Sharkakaka The guy was multiclassing...
@BartzAJohnsonJr2 ай бұрын
You and esoterica help me study these perspectives for my animistic standing. Today, in ceremony, I found the call to return to Jesus for wisdom and to look at him as a magician. Or maybe better to say, a Master.
@Vak_g2 жыл бұрын
Propably the most interesting video I 've seen recently! This moral dimension of wonders is very helpful when you think about the way people understand reality. Thank you very much for this great video
@redtube866710 ай бұрын
The Harry Potter example @17:55 isn't a good one in the sense that it's a misunderstanding of Harry Potter and the universe he lives in. A Jedi would have been a better example (i.e. being force sensitive is biological, but being a Jedi is a generally positively regarded occupation). Being a wizard in Harry Potter isn't an occupation, it's biological. Wizards are a species in Harry Potter that are positive to us, the audience, because we see the wizarding world through the lense of Harry Potter and his allies. But to say wizards in Harry Potter are positively regarded by the general populace inside that universe is absolutely not the case. Wizards were forced into hiding because of genocidal persecution, and it's highly likely that - especially after Voldemort and Grindelwald went a bit crazy - the average person in their universe would react in a violent manner towards wizards out of fear. Love the video and content, but bad comparison!
@ericinoregon57262 жыл бұрын
Wow! Thank you for posting this. Not only entertaining, you’ve expanded my knowledge of Jesus and given me much to think about.
@nicolesawyer-jm6ir8 ай бұрын
This is really wonderful. So grateful ! Clear and focused !
@EidanArdabor2 жыл бұрын
Adoro estos vídeos y al canal en general. Gracias por traernos tan interesantes investigaciones.
@IDreamOfLogic2 жыл бұрын
As a Greek, I enjoyed the use of greek words and the explanation of their meaning. And, oddly enough, I learned some new things. Thank you for that.
@IDreamOfLogic Жыл бұрын
@Isolated Pixels where did it go? I didn't feel moving...
@Robespierre-lI Жыл бұрын
I know it is claimed that ancient and modern Greek are remarkably by similar for the number of centuries that have passed. But surely ancient vocabulary and pronunciation are exactly what a modern Greek speaker would expect to find more challenging about the ancient language.
@Robespierre-lI Жыл бұрын
@@IDreamOfLogic oh dear. This person doesn't realize modern Greece exists. Actually, you could argue that the modern nation state of Greece is the first time Greece appeared in the world, since anfient Greece was not one political entity but several.
@joeschmoe24-7 Жыл бұрын
Is it odd for you to learn ? You must be a genius Share your knowledge
@IDreamOfLogic Жыл бұрын
@@joeschmoe24-7 you are mean for no reason. Does it make you feel good? It was odd that I learned something about the language I speak since birth. I did not expect that, on a channel about religions.
@jonunciate70182 жыл бұрын
There was an interesting pen and paper rpg I played years ago that portrayed Magic as a reality defying effort that could drive the mage insane, especially if others witnessed the magic. However, a particularly pious mage could take a feat that let them perform a finite number of "miracles" allowing them to perform magic without risking their sanity. Other than that, there was very little difference between the two.
@thedappermagician69052 жыл бұрын
Mage: The Awakening
@suicune2001 Жыл бұрын
I love archeology and anthropology so this was right up my alley even though I'm not religious. Thanks!
@innerspacesurfer2 жыл бұрын
my 2 favorite youtube channels in the realm of religion have finally joined forces. thanks guys.
@curiodyssey38672 жыл бұрын
What's the other channel?
@innerspacesurfer2 жыл бұрын
@@curiodyssey3867 esoterica
@quickpaint32 жыл бұрын
This concept adds so much color to a verse that I always found suspicious: "And he did not do many miracles there because of their lack of faith." - Matthew 13:58
@nachtegaelw53892 жыл бұрын
This is such an interesting discussion, thank you for this video! I (a Christian) was recently discussing with a friend (former Christian, current witchcraft/divination practitioner in the Norse neo-pagan stream) about the blurry line between “witchcraft” & religious practice in the Bible. You can find examples curses, ritual objects, & sanctioned forms of divination (Urim & Thumim, casting lots, etc.) in the Bible alongside prohibitions against practicing magic/fortune telling. It’s very interesting! As far as freelance ritual experts…also very interesting! In the book of Acts Paul (& I think Peter) are said to have performed a few healings/miracles in the style of Jesus. All three of them make a big deal of offering their services for free (according to the New Testament), which I guess may have been a difference from other ritual experts who made their livings from their work?
@thewb83292 жыл бұрын
Check out Darren Brown’s channel for a contemporary practitioner.
@DanielLopez-sh2pp2 жыл бұрын
What people dont realize is God gambles with humans and their lives as well as their futures. Including forcefully attempting against people for his own reasons. Illusion is a choice but so is freewill.
@thewb83292 жыл бұрын
Most humans still place meaning on random occurrences and create reasons or things to explain the unknown.
@thewb83292 жыл бұрын
The great thing about faith is that anything is true if you believe it.
@thewb83292 жыл бұрын
I have to go home and feed my unicorn now if you’ll excuse me.
@SanjayMerchant Жыл бұрын
Learning about the contemporary connotations of the word magus kinda makes the whole Simon Magus story read pretty differently. Like, it's not just that he thought he could buy the power of God, but that it's specifically the author wanting to distinguish that what the Apostles (and by implication Jesus himself) were doing was emphatically NOT mageia.
@KevinWarburton-tv2iy10 ай бұрын
Except it was. Moses too fought the Magic of Egyptian Priests with his own Magic granted by God.
@felixcharles97732 жыл бұрын
Interesting stuff - I’ve always found it fascinating that sorcery was seen as a real opposition to the early church, especially in Acts with the stories of Simon Magus and Elymas. Do you know if there is any indication that the ‘Holy Spirit’ as conferred in Acts 8:19 was a known power to sorcerers/magicians of that time and place, or could this passage be an indication that early Christian authors wanted to show the superiority of the Holy Spirit/Miracles in Jesus’ name (greater authority or prestige) compared to those of other magicians? Thanks for the great videos!
@mnm88182 жыл бұрын
For those that want real Bible Godly witchcraft read Leviticus 14:48-53 Anti- Mold Potion: You'll need 2 birds, fresh water, a knife, mint, herbs, red string and something to splatter bird blood with.
@mnm88182 жыл бұрын
My 1.25 cent for OP Qs based on lots of stuff- Ancient Israel was always in competition with other gods since Genesis. Eg the light on fire tree branches drenched in water competition. N.T. authors may have modernised it to fit with Greek trends just as OT did with the surrounding cultures. They are just a small nation amongst empire sized ones. culture works from greater to the smaller, not the other way around, as in the Bible. Psychologically, ancient Israel writers possibly over exaggerate and compensate, expressing themselves to a fantasy of escapism and guidance. Which nearly all ancient writers do. Earth was a fantasy world to them. Mystery and wonder. As such so too are their stories.
@CleverNameTBD2 жыл бұрын
It's a miracle if it's your religion. It's magic if it's someone else's
@JaysonT12 жыл бұрын
@@CleverNameTBD Right?
@Ugly_German_Truths2 жыл бұрын
The jewish mystics / priests seem to have suffered from criticism and inferiority complexes for a long time, compare Moses and Aaron competing with the egyptian priests and magicians or ... i forgot which prophet it was that had the "miracle off" with the wet altar but the scene is pretty unforgettable.
@baileywright16562 жыл бұрын
Great video! I actually had a similar debate a few weeks ago. I loved hearing your well thought out examination - wish I could have pointed the others towards it while we were still discussing it :)
@stefers84518 ай бұрын
Love listening to your videos. So informative
@Carlos-ln8fd2 жыл бұрын
Amazing video! Love learning about all of these scholars and their work.
@jd190d2 жыл бұрын
In my Social Psychology class the teacher was also an amateur magician. In one of the classes he said he was going to do some tricks and some readings, emphasizing that these were all tricks. After some readings two of the people in my class said that they did not want to see this anymore because it was demonic. This is a college class and the teacher made it known these were simply tricks. If some of these people responded that way what would people without the combined knowledge that is our present world have made of someone who managed to learn some simple reading and distraction tricks. I still think one of the best examples of the magic ability of Jesus is in the clip of Family Guy, Jesus magic tricks.
@semperfi-19182 жыл бұрын
Just because someone says its a simple trick doesnt mean it doesnt have demonic familiar spirits behind it or them. Not saying he used them knowingly or unknowingly but demonic forces have been used behind a majority of majic. And secondly Jesus was not Jesus so by name only to it as a magician is negated right there. Secondly... not sure which one but a magician came to purchase and learn the miracles inwhich was denied. Secondly Yeshua aka Jesus never went away from Torah inwhich called magic evil and a sin... so this guys analogy is far from the truth.
@theodorejenkins60662 жыл бұрын
@@semperfi-1918 Lol @ the torah calling magic a sin. Ever heard of the cabbala?
@semperfi-19182 жыл бұрын
@@theodorejenkins6066 cabala is not based on Torah but other writtings. Should do some homework on it. Show me where Torah says its ok to do magic?
@m.9352 жыл бұрын
@@theodorejenkins6066 Deuteronomy 18:9-12 "When you come into the land that the Lord your God is giving you, you shall not learn to follow the abominable practices of those nations. There shall not be found among you anyone who burns his son or his daughter as an offering, anyone who practices divination or tells fortunes or interprets omens, or a sorcerer or a charmer or a medium or a necromancer or one who inquires of the dead, for whoever does these things is an abomination to the Lord. And because of these abominations the Lord your God is driving them out before you."
@m.9352 жыл бұрын
@@theodorejenkins6066 Kabbala appeared in the 12th century, and it is completely heretical to Judaism and Christianity. It belongs to a few sects, and (not suprisingly) popular in Hollywood.
@cramerfloro59362 жыл бұрын
I found the idea that these "magic" objects were produced by religious figures interesting. In Italian folktales, when the role typical of a fairy is played by a male figure, he usually gets called either a "wizard"/"magician" (mago) or a "monk"/"hermit" (monaco/eremita)
@cav89-7 ай бұрын
I never came across your channel before, surprisingly. The video about the Good Samaritan parable just popped on my feed earlier today and this is the second video of yours I’m watching. The amount of information and knowledge condensed here is impressive, absolutely worth of praise. And you are non-partisan to a fault 😆. Been a while since I last came upon quality content like this! I’ll probably binge through all your videos in the next few days, heh.
@AB-fg4mh2 жыл бұрын
As for myself, I can say that I grew up with the idea of Jesus as a teacher and grew up around books and teachers in my life. Funny how that builds the relationship with the way we experience life.
@NormBoyle2 жыл бұрын
there were also an ancient examples of turning water into wine, where you had a pottery container with two sections up to the spout, so you could cover one side and pour water, or the other side to provide wine to the VIP.
@joe18750 Жыл бұрын
the assassin's pot.
@mattmathematics3591 Жыл бұрын
😂
@hackman669 Жыл бұрын
So you want to be an assassin! Are you ready for a distant shore. Hey there's no going back...
@jclive2860 Жыл бұрын
@@joe18750 too bad the assassins pot originated from China dating back to the Ming dynasty. Nowhere to be found anywhere near where Jesus roamed
@joe18750 Жыл бұрын
@@jclive2860 good grief, you've tripped over yourself to make an embarrassingly irrelevant point. read what N Boyle posted. that's what I responded too. no mention of China or Jesus. go back to Tic-Toc. Adults are talking here.
@OSAS27 Жыл бұрын
I just found ur channel after watching your interview with Alex O'Connor. I am enjoying your videos. I like your unbiased approach so far. You mentioned historical references to Jewish exorcists. There is a reference in Acts about this: Acts 19:13 Then some of the itinerant Jewish exorcists took it upon themselves to call the name of the Lord Jesus over those who had evil spirits, saying, “We exorcise you by the Jesus whom Paul preaches.” 14 Also there were seven sons of Sceva, a Jewish chief priest, who did so.
@TheWizardArtist Жыл бұрын
This is one of your most interesting videos, it's a shame you don't have many videos about magic on your channel, greetings!!
@cartoonraccoon2078 Жыл бұрын
They absolutely have videos 'about magic' in that they point out how they are all stories created by people who either didn't understand the world or were actively trying to convince you of something.
@ilirlluka67892 жыл бұрын
You are an educational gem, well done sir, keep up the great work.
@DanKaraJordan2 жыл бұрын
The area I would like to have seen you pin down more precisely was the literary role of Simon Magus in Acts of the Apostles. Simon clearly interpreted the power of the Holy Spirit as a supernatural power that could be ritually imparted onto him through the laying on of hands and that would supplement his own suite of ritual abilities. The curse that he is given for offering money for the Holy Spirit seems to be a literary opportunity for the author of Acts to rebuke any readers who might hold this position. This seems to fall in line with the burning of magical texts in Greece and in the exorcism of the spirit of divination that we see in Acts.
@elsosagaming Жыл бұрын
Something I have always thought he might of existed, people witnessed sight if hand tricks were amazed and chinese wispers do the rest and a story is created that has been changed and adapted over hundreds of years by people who could read and write and took advantage of people who could not.
@taiwanluthiers Жыл бұрын
Celsus argument seems very similar to the argument Pharisees made against Jesus, where they essentially accused Jesus of casting out demons with the power of demons. His response is basically that a house divided against itself cannot stand, and something about blasphemy against the holy spirit is an unforgivable sin. It's little wonder why Celsus's work never survived.
@WoollyLuke2 жыл бұрын
As someone who grew up in a Pentecostal church, believing in & even witnessing the ritual of exorcism & wonder workings, this research means so much to me. Thank you for helping me understand my own humanity.
@slxt4c0ca1n3 Жыл бұрын
Woah you really witnessed an exorcism?
@Alice-mv9pj Жыл бұрын
Mental health is amazing, isn't it?
@wesleywyndam-pryce5305 Жыл бұрын
what witnessed was the traumatizing and probably torture of another person. the world is a worse place because of those toxic delusions.
@caswavala9624 Жыл бұрын
@@wesleywyndam-pryce5305 fr
@flxj1 Жыл бұрын
@@wesleywyndam-pryce5305 you need a exorcism session too?
@icarusunited2 жыл бұрын
One thing most people don't realize it only takes around 10 years to walk from Great Britain to East China. 10 Years from Northern Europe to South Africa. Give or take 20-50 for mountain, travel stops, etc. When you think of it like this... A lot of theories (Out of Africa theory) becomes more speculative than fact; for example, in Jesus life he could of traveled from Egypt to anywhere in the Middle East safely with in his life span. --- Assuming frequent breaks it quite literally only take the average person one month to walk to Egypt at a very casual pace from Jerusalem. Assuming Frequent Breaks, it'll take around 3-6 months to walk from Great Britain to China. Assuming Frequent Breaks, and you can walk on water. 6 Month to a year getting from China to the US.
@awogbob2 жыл бұрын
Was wondering what the tone of this video may be and was bracing myself for cringey over simplification of history and someone trying to cope with their repressed religious trauma. Was pleasently surprised to find an articulate and fair exploration of the sources and history. Thank you!
@ReligionForBreakfast2 жыл бұрын
Haha, I get that a lot. The secular study of religion is so rare on YT, that people are surprised when they stumble upon videos from that perspective.
@realmothchu2 жыл бұрын
you must be new here lol
@andybunn57802 жыл бұрын
This channel is legit bro
@DAG_422 жыл бұрын
My family and I have been enjoying this channel a lot. Growing up in a religion but never really learning its history is strange and tragic. That's our family though.
@enriquepenanieto4398 Жыл бұрын
“religious trauma” is itself a cope
@me_gaming1085 Жыл бұрын
I really enjoy watching your videos, because they are so well structured and descriptive. Thank you for your work!
@cartoonraccoon2078 Жыл бұрын
Makes sense. My Grandaddy used to fool the masses like a shaman with simple mechanical tricks. I imagine it was much easier to do that in the preindustrial ages.
@Von_Sky Жыл бұрын
Mere fact that now we have more advanced technology does not mean that people are more wise. I don't think it is more difficult to fool people than it was 2000 years ago...
@allwillberevealed777 Жыл бұрын
Yeah, I saw that episode of Family Guy. 🤡
@icarojose6316 Жыл бұрын
His most complicated trick to perform was the reviving, since he revived and still had some of his wounds and his followers touched his wounds to believe
@PaPi0141 Жыл бұрын
Could u image how easy it was to manipulate people then esp if u had a lot of time to think and come up with things. Or how many times these story have been rewritten. Almost impossible to know the real truth of those times.
@mihakabercic4457 Жыл бұрын
@blakejamesiam1410 the bible today is if I can remember 99.3% the same as the 2000 year old ones but then again their are words in Hebrew that can't be translated into English properly
@PLuMUK542 жыл бұрын
I found the section on exorcism particularly interesting. A few weeks ago a friend and his sister were both "possessed" in front of many of their family. Whatever my own thoughts about this event, to the "victims" and their family, a "demon" took possession of first the sister, then passed on to my friend. The description of exorcism in Jewish and Christian religions is almost the same as for Muslims. Eventually the family found a maulana who was willing to carry out the exorcism, others saying that the demon was too powerful for them. Special prayers and rituals were carried out, and the "demon" was driven out and ordered not to harm humans again. At least one member of the family considered this to be "magical mumbo-jumbo" in a negative way. When I discussed the event with my friend, after his recovery, I asked him if the exorcism was magical, and he said that it definitely was. I then asked if that meant that the maulana was a magician, and his response was less confident. Magician has a negative connotation to my friend, and he was unwilling to attach the label to the maulana. Perhaps this was a similar conflict two thousand years ago. All were willing to accept that magic had occurred, but only critics would be willing to take the next step of stating that Jesus was a magician. His supporters perhaps thought he was, but, because of the negativity of the word, they could not bring themselves to say that he was a magician. Failure to give the title does not mean that most, including even disciples, did not consider Jesus to be a magician, just as my friend would not "insult" the maulana who had "saved" him.
@didack14192 жыл бұрын
I know that there were pagan critics that called out that Jesus was working _magic_ , I don't remember how that was supposed to go, if he was commanding evil spirits/demons (Luke addresses this criticism) or by some other way. The point is that those pagans at least pretty often didn't deny that Jesus made "miracles", what they argued was that those "miracles" came from the creator god. And of course they did, if they didn't they would basically be Christians. Although I remember perfectly well that Porphyry called out the accuracy of the accounts by the fact that in Mark they called the lake of Galilee a " stormy sea" while it's just a lake. I haven't read that much, but I wonder if that lead him to believe that maybe Jesus didn't make any magic at all.
@didack14192 жыл бұрын
Reply to me so I can find this comment later please.
@stylicho2 жыл бұрын
@@didack1419 I didn't think of the "stormy sea" in relation to the lake until you brought it up. To me there's so much symbolic, esoteric language in the Bible where I first believe something to be analogous before I take it to be literal. You now also have a reply lol
@didack14192 жыл бұрын
@@stylicho thanks Yeah, I know it's meant to have deeper meaning, I've read that some consider it a representation of God calming the waters of Chaos and stuff. Of course a pagan wouldn't get it, and to be fair, at the end it's gonna be misleading, and people can notice it.
@sirjerearchive13422 жыл бұрын
@@didack1419 If Jesus commands demons out of people and speaks to demons that no one but Solomon, How is Jesus not a magician? Christians are just hypocrites that say whatever they do is correct and the rest of the world is wrong. It’s pretty odd when you look at Christianity for what it is and not what it’s believers tell you.
@justalittlechikon45112 жыл бұрын
10:16 This is interesting. In Spanish we call a "magician" a "mago" (plural "magos"), and the word is more associated with performers.
@HeavyMetal-jy4vj2 жыл бұрын
This video is implying in English Jesus was just a famous magician who used his skills to get a cult started around him.
@isaacrenne6031 Жыл бұрын
Outstanding work. Congratulations!
@MrARock0012 жыл бұрын
The study of historical curses (or protection from them) is fascinating when viewed through the lens of mental health. If you irrationally feel like you're always being watched, you might describe an "evil eye" that's been cast on you.
@kayè5316 Жыл бұрын
True
@nowhereman60192 жыл бұрын
The blurring of the difference between religious blessings and magician spells remind me of how in Demons Souls it's revealed that Magic and Miracles aren't separate things but come from the same source.
@theMoporter2 жыл бұрын
Something interesting I've noticed in Celtic and other British tales is that magic use can be good or bad, but basically anyone trying to use magic of their own accord is a bad guy. Good magic tends towards non-consensual blessing, or a favour from a non-human who stumbles on the protagonist while they're in a pickle. We don't have original versions of most of these stories, only Christianised ones, so I have to wonder if that changed anything. I'm just saying, it would make sense of the number of talking animals distributing gold/jewel/mountain-filled fruit to distressed royal children.
@Vherstinae2 жыл бұрын
That seems consistent even with the stories that seem to have survived their Christianizing, like with the fae. Someone who tries to use magic on their own is exercising hubris, while good magic seems to match up with other religious beliefs of the time - that blessings are given for a righteous life, but cannot be demanded.
@AustinPerdue6 ай бұрын
10/10 video, thank you.
@danielvillarrealjr.66392 жыл бұрын
Tolkien made reference the point that the terms used to describe rituals have strong cultural ties and are not neutral in their meaning. One character had from an early age, a desire for the tales concerning elves and their 'magic' but an elf describes their confusion at the characters desire, as the term magic is used in universe with a negative connotation, whereas the elves mystical capabilities as 'craft' or 'ritual' or even as 'art'...
@jonbaker4762 жыл бұрын
I grew up Mormon and you see the same thing with Joseph Smith. He used New England folklore to elevate himself above other people claiming visions at that time. His "seership" was no different than soothsaying and it was also how he translated the BOM. But after he died, people began to instantly rid the church history of these supernatural aspects, instead making people think that he just sat down and read from golden plates to translate the BOM, when in reality he had a rock in a hat, which was superstitious magic-work. It's much more realistic imo to think Jesus was the same. Joseph Smith grew up in a hyper religious time at the tail end of the protestant movement in America, where dozens of people were claiming to be prophets, whereas Jesus was growing up in a time of exorcists and magicians
@TIMEtoRIDE9002 жыл бұрын
Joseph Smith was chosen by Jesus - best friends. Sometimes they talked weekly, Jesus giving needed instructions. Except for that time in Missouri when the all-knowing Jesus knew his friend was going to be shot dead ! Or the mis-management of the Ohio Bank, or the whole issue of Polygamy not being accepted.
@myth61422 жыл бұрын
@@TIMEtoRIDE900 dum dum dum dum
@shannadaul64382 жыл бұрын
@@myth6142 you are 🎵 smart smart smart smart smart.🎵
@TheLincolnrailsplitt2 жыл бұрын
Ridiculous.
@kennykenny5273 Жыл бұрын
Interesting but Jesus Christ is much more than that
@MaryamMaqdisi2 жыл бұрын
So THAT'S why the Tremere's signature discipline is Thaumaturgy lol. In all honesty, amazing video. Extremely interesting and very well researched and written. Thanks.
@wolfsbanealphas617 Жыл бұрын
I was not expecting a vampire the masquerade fan
@RedReb3 ай бұрын
I wished I knew some of those rituals so I could heal myself because prayers don't work. Great video Glad I found your channel😊
@beatleblev2 жыл бұрын
My favorite Freelance Ritual Specialist in the Bible is Balaam. Just a wizard and his donkey tryin' to get paid and being denied.
@broca83142 жыл бұрын
Sympathetic magic, all of his miracles follow an act of faith by someone who needs or is in connection by someone in need. The objects/rituals that people put their faith in, grounds their faith and it acts as type of medium where there faith is transmuted into the thing they are being faithful for. There is faith that the healing can happen, Jesus answers that faith with it getting done. Whenever he is asked to prove himself as a divine being by doing an act of “magic” or miracle he does not do it because there is no faith to Activate the spiritual energy he fosters because they did not initially believe who he said he was. I would say that Jesus as a magician doesn’t encapsulate the transitionary aspect , faith + thaumaturgy, fully. The gospels stance that anyone can access these thaumaturgies through their faith and belief in Jesus as the mediator between God and Man, while being both himself, is one of the main points of the gospels.
@nailonross4162 жыл бұрын
Well he's not a genie. And we don't even see these miracles today and he wouldn't show himself by performing miracles because he's a coward that hides
@pedrolopa22 жыл бұрын
Interesting, I thought the discussion would go another way : to me a magician is someone who uses tricks to do what appears impossible (changing water in wine, walking on water, multiplication of bread...) and "fooling" the audience. Some people believe Jesus was like that.
@tompatterson15482 жыл бұрын
This seems to focus on if he was a mage. Clickbait, imo..
@jarthurl4 күн бұрын
Great video and analysis! I admire your work!
@faith-by-faith2 жыл бұрын
As a witch, I don't recommend cursing someone over a stolen hoodie.
@tompatterson15482 жыл бұрын
Do you mean swearing or magically cursiing?
@jacquolen19522 жыл бұрын
Sir- your well produced and informative presentations are the best on KZbin. You never act as if you had a dog in the fight- only using the discipline of of historical textual criticism to flesh out a well crafted argument. I await your next presentation- Rich
@DavidJamesHenry2 жыл бұрын
When I was in vacation bible school as a youngster, there was a church who used a circus as a theme. Each day, a new character was revealed, the Strongman, the Lion Tamer, etc, and each character was an excuse to tell the story of a bible character. On Thursday of that week, they revealed Jesus as a character, and I blurted out that Jesus was The Magician. I remember this in detail because the hours long berating I received was imprinted into me. Apparently Jesus was "The Rock" and calling Jesus a magician was heretical.
@davidhildebrandt78122 жыл бұрын
I think the title of "The Rock" for a biblical figure should definitely go to Simon Peter.
@didack14192 жыл бұрын
Mmm, I feel like this is a very stupid question but, does "rock" mean anything else than a rock? Because what's the point of mentioning a rock as a character? (I've never gone to a circus) :| Why is that remarkable "the rock" compare to anything else? I guess Jesus can't be anthropomorphisized by a human character?
@DavidJamesHenry2 жыл бұрын
@@didack1419 Their point was that Jesus was the foundation, the fulcrum of our lives. Again, it was vacation bible school. They're not trying to be theologically sound.
@didack14192 жыл бұрын
@@DavidJamesHenry Yeah, haha, I understand that is an explanation for kids but how remarkable can the rock be on a circus. It sounds so cheap
@tompatterson15482 жыл бұрын
@@davidhildebrandt7812 What? The guy whose name is literally just "rock but male"? Noooooooo.
@SpeezyOTB10 ай бұрын
What could this man do if he was angry? With context from this video in mind, Batman versus Superman makes a lot more sense even if Batman seems radical in that instance. Thank you for this video. Your content is very intriguing.
@numberThree07032 жыл бұрын
Great video! It’s hard to disagree that Smith makes some fairly speculative jumps, and I found your argument about his application of the nomenclature of ancient magical practitioners fairly convincing, but the argument about his use of the magical papyri may not be as solid. Smith isn’t alone in using these papyri to drawn conclusions about eastern Mediterranean magic in earlier centuries. Christopher Faraone also does so, and he shows how Greek and Roman literary texts from the archaic, classical and Hellenistic periods reveal striking parallels with the much later magical papyri. I think Smith deserves more credit than he gets these days, espcially given that he was working with the magical papyri before there was an accessible English translation.
@HesderOleh2 жыл бұрын
That is the one part I actually disagree most about. Academic jargon is often slightly removed from daily usage. And even the word in use today can mean so many different things. I am just thinking of the way that modern preforming magicians have such a diverse array of thought as to what the word should mean, even inside their niche. For instance Penn of Penn and Teller does not like "magic" that makes an audience thing that anything super-natural occurred.
@mooseitself2 жыл бұрын
When I hear magician, I think of the modern version of a magician and I believe it applies to ancient people just fine. Though their role is different now, their methods have only refined.
@HesderOleh2 жыл бұрын
I think the difference is that many more people probably believed in magic. But there really is no difference between faith healers in megachurches and penn and teller, except that penn and teller aren't scamming and lying to people.
@katherinegilks38802 жыл бұрын
So someone who was born blind was only given the illusion of sight? Or he was faking it for twenty-some years, because being a blind beggar on the street is so awesome? There were ancient magicians who did the same kind of tricks modern ones do. Miracle-workers aren’t illusionists. Either someone is healed or they aren’t. None of the acts in the Gospels are illusions or parlour tricks. I’m not saying they necessarily happened, but they weren’t modern magic tricks. It was either fakery, the placebo effect, or real. The fakery aspect would be fairly easy to disprove back in the day, but could have happened. The placebo effect wouldn’t work on most of the miracles recorded.
@mooseitself2 жыл бұрын
@@katherinegilks3880 They are called plants. That is when the supposed 'random participant' is actually in on the magic trick. We are also seeing these magic tricks through the lens of thousands of years of worship. Imagine someone like Chris Angel 3000 years ago. I'm just free spinning now, but I mean imagine any decent magician from now, but back in Biblical time, getting any amount of financial backing. They would be Gods yo. Just speculating and stuff off the ideas here. Idk how I feel about that fr lol.
@gabrielserrano5054 Жыл бұрын
The old magic is still unknown. Maybe future science will find new physics phenomenon like quantum mechanics. Accessing the fourth dimension would be powerful. Almost like time traveling or making atoms change structures.
@mooseitself Жыл бұрын
@@gabrielserrano5054 Just saying something that doesn't exist is unknown, doesn't make it exist my guy. Science that is indistinguishable from magic absolutely could exist in the future or maybe even on other planets somewhere, but that isn't magic and the ancients definitely didn't have it...
@Sewblon2 жыл бұрын
The accusation that Jesus received exotic training in Egypt by Celsus that Origin denies means that there is more to the miracle/magic distinction than the moral category. Egypt is a real place. So if Jesus received any training in Thaumaturgy in Egypt is not a moral question, but an historical question. So what makes someone a magician as opposed to a miracle worker in the context of 2nd century greco-Roman culture has to do with how one acquired their thaumaturgical arts in an empirical sense, not merely a moral sense.
@pentalarclikesit8228 ай бұрын
Just to let you know, I know its' a minor thing, but just to let you know "goeteia" and "goete" are nowadays also "positive terms of self-identification" (I believe this is the term you are using, I might have misremembered) in the same was as "witch" among modern Wiccans, among Chthonic Pagans. (My source is myself, I am a Chthonic Pagan, and previously considered myself primarily Wiccan, and thus know that both terms are used among the groups in the same way. Note: I am a Universalist, but my expression is as a Chthonic Pagan.)
@jenniferromano86552 жыл бұрын
I just heard this whole topic on the Magi on the radio 2 days ago. I wanted to hear more on it. I didn't even go searching and I just found it, with the title of video being something I would not have looked for. I'm a believer, regardless! Great work, Thank You !
@crazykhespar84872 жыл бұрын
Dont be afraid of asking questions, stranger. It helps critical thought immensely. Just question stuff more.
@mortified7762 жыл бұрын
Sulis: '....Really?' Devotee: 'It was a _really_ nice cloak!'
@stevenglowacki85762 жыл бұрын
I was actually expecting a discussion as to whether Jesus employed sleight of hand or other chicanery to make it seem like he performed miracles. What it was instead was still interesting.
@Nylak-Otter Жыл бұрын
They're called *ILLUSIANS,* Michael! But seriously, same. I feel like this question didn't need an answer, because of course he was a "magician." He used magic to make things happen just like in every other folk tale, only they claimed in this particular case that his magic was given to him by their god.
@kaarlimakela341311 ай бұрын
I don't think you left out any details. Fascinating. 😊 At the end of the story, thinking of the number of magic practitioners and some conmen at the time 😆 my mind always goes back to Monty Python's Life of Brian.
@juliantreidiii2 жыл бұрын
How about did he use "medicine" from that time? Placebo effect? Placebo effect has a 32% efficacy. What about Paul as a Magician?
@sowhat...9 ай бұрын
Lazarus had a hell of a placebo effect
@Ragnarok540 Жыл бұрын
"You are a wizard, Jesus!" - Hagrid, probably.
@CliffCardi2 жыл бұрын
Performs magic tricks in 33AD: “Messiah! Praise him!” Performs magic tricks in 17th century: “Witch! Burn him!”
@PatricksBreastplate2 жыл бұрын
Dude, they crucified him.
@CliffCardi2 жыл бұрын
@@PatricksBreastplate because they thought he would start an insurrection, not because of magic tricks
@jonathacirilo57452 жыл бұрын
@@CliffCardi it was kinda both. some called him a devil worshiper servant, which is kinda what a witch is, or something like that.
@CliffCardi2 жыл бұрын
@@jonathacirilo5745 well Jews hated him because he preformed miracles on the Sabbath
@jonathacirilo57452 жыл бұрын
@@CliffCardi some jews. and yeah, among other things.
@richardglady3009 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for all your hard work in the production of this video. It gives such a great introduction into the subject of “magic” in this time frame and locale. Thanks for the discussion of sources which can be independently viewed. I have watched Esoterica and like the channel. Rhetorically, I have two questions: how did other figures from this time-Simon Mago and Apollonia of Tyana differ from Jesus and did John the Baptist perform “magic” (even if not documented)?
@tasmarkou568111 ай бұрын
And show me a,magician that can turn off the sun for 3 hours world wide when he was on the cross ,as Amos prophesied I will make the sun go down at noon. And thers are historian that recorded it .