Final Exams and Video Playlists: www.video-tutor.net/ Full-Length Math & Science Videos: www.patreon.com/mathsciencetutor/collections
@Famhe4 жыл бұрын
15:33 The minor product is the one shown, the major product would be deprotonation of the alpha-carbon to the right of the ketone on the top left, as this would result in the most highly substituted and therefore stable double bond.
@zacharyelfallah10703 жыл бұрын
I don't think because that would form a 4 member ring which is less stable than a 6 member ring.
@PunmasterSTP3 жыл бұрын
@@zacharyelfallah1070 I think Famhe is referencing the formation of the final alpha-beta unsaturated ketone, and I think his reasoning is correct. I'm not sure how much steric factors would come into play (i.e. the strain produced by having the double bond in the side where the two rings are fused vs. having it between an alpha carbon and a carbon shared by both rings) but I think the argument about substitution is valid.
@kendalldoer54662 жыл бұрын
Yeah @samter steric factors should not matter because we're using KOH which is not bulky, so I think Famhe is right, the major product would be the other double bond because it's more stable to deprotonate the top alpha proton
@najmakousar6695 Жыл бұрын
You are an incrediblly the best teacher and best explainer ever
@PunmasterSTP3 жыл бұрын
This was an incredible explanation; thank you so much for taking the time to make it, and then for putting it up on KZbin. I studied the Michael addition and the Robinson annulation before, but I've certainly forgot some of the finer points, like the effect of basicity on the type of reaction. For a lot of reasons, I had a great time watching your video!
@prakhyatpandey53416 ай бұрын
Pls make a series pertaining to JEE Advanced Organic Chemistry, as I absolutely adore the way that you make concepts in organic chem so simple...
@prakhyatpandey53416 ай бұрын
You would get tons of support! Love from India!
@bonndell4 жыл бұрын
Your videos always help so much!!! Thank youu 🙏❤️
@millerzion68633 жыл бұрын
Instablaster.
@HasanKhan-qz5uq2 жыл бұрын
Insta I'd ?
@redington68182 жыл бұрын
so loving, every point well elaborated into detail.
@ItsKeshini2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the videos you make! They are always super helpful. I always understand whatever I came for when I click on your videos.
@dramaturge2313 ай бұрын
Thanks so much for your help! One thing, around 11:40 you said that stronger bases prefer to attack at the carbonyl carbon than the beta carbon. Isn't it that stronger nucleophiles prefer to attack at the carbonyl carbon than the beta carbon? Not the same thing, right, since weaker bases are stronger nucleophiles, and stronger bases are weaker nucleophiles? Thanks!
@cfebresmol4 жыл бұрын
Great explanation, thanks!
@brnTost6 жыл бұрын
Could the last OH- have taken the alpha H next to the other carbonyl group, and formed a double bond between the two rings instead?
@ateata78545 жыл бұрын
Unfavorable due to geometry
@infernape7164 жыл бұрын
@Jm Cresencio That's right. The dehydration of an aldol product forms a double bond in conjugation with the original carbonyl.
@srinjoyganguly36502 жыл бұрын
3:07 why does it not undergo aldol reaction in presence of OH- and 2 ketones ?
@nileshsharma45292 жыл бұрын
your videos are really helpful
@jonathansanchez88023 жыл бұрын
Thank you again!
@Sonkodad0496 жыл бұрын
which is the alpha H in the keto in your first step
@nein71703 жыл бұрын
what is different between intramolecular aldol and robinson annulation? this reaction reversibel or irreversibel?
@bruno0_u2 жыл бұрын
Not sure about reversability but the intramolecular Aldol is just the second step of the Robinson annulation. Robinson Annulation is just 1) Michael Addition (α, β unsaturated ketone) followed by 2) Intermolecular Aldol (1,2 direct)
@rupamsaikiah25793 жыл бұрын
Thanks sir it's very helpful
@mehmetkosoval34992 жыл бұрын
Hey please if the C alpha between C=O and C-OH is not disponible to losean H which one can WE use
@sallygim31295 жыл бұрын
Is he saying micro addition or Michael addition? The caption keeps saying micro
@tahj4205 жыл бұрын
michael
@lindahamed47773 жыл бұрын
THANK YOUUU! I finally understand it
@sumsum4046 жыл бұрын
thank you
@jeremymcadams77434 жыл бұрын
Does it have to form a 6 member ring?
@joanad12462 ай бұрын
Tyyy❤
@atabonglinus43063 жыл бұрын
Thanks man!
@shahidhussainaljani88783 жыл бұрын
Thanks
@Pilihendrix4 жыл бұрын
love you again
@ruger519953 жыл бұрын
But isnt OH group not a good leaving group?
@RhysGreenable3 жыл бұрын
that's why it needs heat to overcome the activation energy
@kendalldoer54662 жыл бұрын
It's a good enough leaving group if the rxn in being done in base (which it is). If it is being done in acidic conditions than you need C-OH2+
@羅孟軒 Жыл бұрын
Awesome
@nicksacco50413 жыл бұрын
I swear all of these carbonyl reactions are so similar