Rolex Sea-Dweller 43 vs Omega Seamaster Planet Ocean 600M 126600 215.30.44.21.03.001 Dive Watches

[@craigbrowne8563]

OMEGA ALL DAY LONG.

[@williamstalvey6920]

....always go with deepsea, sea dweller, submariner, mil sub, unless your thing is to throw money away#rolexallday

[@gpearce11]

William Stalvey Why should I spend twice as much for a watch I don’t prefer, and is objectively no better, especially as I have no intentions to sell it?

[@omegarepair-johnscreek2907]

I like both...and purchased the PO about a year ago. What won me over was the more modern execution of a steel diver. Personally, I think the co-axial is the better movement. The blue / silver can be blingy in some light conditions without screaming "look at me". The bracelet is probably the best function, fit and finish I have worn including a Submariner. (Actually sold my 3-year old HULK taking money of the table, then bought 5 month old PO with the profit). In addition, my Rolex brand perception is probably less than it used to be while OMEGA is up. They lost control over distribution of the steel sport segment and catering 100% to grey dealers. Genuine buyers walking into an AD are staring at empty display cases in the meantime.The pendulum is gonna swing the other way eventually, but I could be wrong.

[@hathaway.1166]

Def an eye-catching look

[@snakeplissken9540]

You nailed it. I had a Rolex Kermit that would lose time and it drove me crazy. It wasn't huge amounts but enough that by the end of a month I was a solid five minutes late to everything. Sold it and bought not only a Planet Ocean but a Seamaster 300 back in 2021. Far superior movement and honestly look way better. No one has ever asked me if my Omega's are real.

[@damachine3]

The first thing I did when I woke up, before my feet even hit the floor, was put on my SD43. It's my buddy. I have an amazing collection and it gets the most wrist time. I highly recommended it...from the boardroom, to the bedroom, to the beach. ;)

[@the1916companywatchreviews]

Or even the pool table to the pool! Great choice. I've learned to appreciate the charisma of this model. Best, Tim

[@damachine3]

@@the1916companywatchreviews Good one. ;)

[@mattchedzey]

I love both of these watches, however, I hate the way the SD43 lug to lug is so long. The PO wraps around the wrist, but the SD43 just looks too long from the side on and ends up with an air gap under each end link on a normal sized wrist. Also, it's worth stating that the AR coating on the PO is crystal clear as opposed to the Rolex that's always reflecting white.

[@edx21x]

on this wrist yes. Not on a wrist 7”+

[@gpearce11]

Omega all the way. Money no object, I prefer its movement and it’s design. I can’t help but find pretty much all Oyster case Rolex a bit boring design wise, and I appreciate the extra specifications of the Omega’s movement. While I don’t love the He release valve, I don’t mind it, and I definitely prefer it to Rolex’s cyclops, and while the PO600 is quite thick I would never wear a watch like this with a suit/dress shirt so that doesn’t bother me at all. Finally, if we do take money into consideration, it’s honestly no contest. At retail they’re fairly close, with a slight nod to Omega value wise, but the PO can be had for well under retail (even when new), and the SD is so overpriced at resale (the only way to get one) that I’d rather have either 2-3 Omegas (including one to wear with a suit) or a Blancpain Fifty Fathoms for what it sells for. Honestly even if the Rolex was better, it’s definitely not 3 times better, which is the true price difference between these two.

[@jimbeam4111]

Geoffrey Pearce well said

[@devinbrown7426]

Exactly, just get a Fifty Fathoms and call it a day, I agree 💯

[@devinbrown7426]

@@richardjspragg Yep, and you sound like a thoughtless sheep. "How many people".... that basically shows that you don't have the means to think for yourself. You're validating a watch based off of popularity and other people's opinions. Sounds like a great way to live, I bet you also have an iPhone because your friends do too 😀

[@jimbeam4111]

Richard S lol are you serious? Every clown has a sub or gmt. Rolex is a gimmick watch. Usually worn by the gent without two nickels to rub together. Hell most of the bozos wearing them can’t even read them. As far as quality ALL of these watches are the same quality. They’re all made on cnc machines . Very, very easy and cheap to make.

[@jimbeam4111]

Richard S I am cheap. That’s why I have money. Rolex is a gimmick watch. Why do you think every gang banger has one? Their looking to give off the illusion of wealth. If you think any of these watches are worth or are superior to the other you’re nuts. These things are made on cnc machines. They are very easily manufactured. Rolex, Omega, IWC, whoever has probably at most $200-300 in each watch. Quality wise there is absolutely NO difference. Keep being sucker if believe anything else. Goofball

[@alfonsopartida901]

When the price reference its around a half, the tech comparative aspects are more difficult to value. Question: when can we see a Rlx case back with zafire, to look inside "the great" mechanism and quality of finish details?????

[@the1916companywatchreviews]

The Omega is ungainly. I'd choose a Seamaster Diver 300M over either of these watches for under $4,000. But in a matchup of a Planet Ocean and SD43, the Rolex is the one for me. Best, Tim

[@richardsoos8902]

I always thought that the slouch of the arrow head on the P.Ocean hour hand looks like the jaunty cap of a Disney Pyschadellic Toadstool. I must admit, I did buy a P.O. , and the hacking seconds and also the changeover of date as the hour hits 12 midnight is so precise. What a watch.

[@hugohernandez3651]

Why should we choose? If you can get that Rolex, certainly you can add easily that PO to the collection as well. There is a lot of love for Omega among Rolex owners. Myself included. Amazing video as usual Tim.

[@rousseau327]

This is not a perspective that is realistic for many people. I'm sure there are people who can afford both and/or are collecting hardcore luxury dive watches, and will buy both, but the majority of people will either 1) choose one and only one, because this is their one big watch purchase, or 2) buy one of the two, and then spend their money on other watches, so diversify a collection.

[@hugohernandez3651]

@@rousseau327 Fair point.

[@gpearce11]

ewt415 If you’re forced to make this your only watch purchase for monetary reasons, the Rolex is an awful choice, as it costs almost triple the Omega. If money is a concern at all, you shouldn’t be looking at Rolex period, as their inflated resale value makes them terrible value across the board. I think OPs point was, if your seriously considering both as viable options, you probably have enough disposable income to purchase both, as it isn’t that much more to buy both than to just buy the Rolex.

[@rousseau327]

Geoffrey Pearce I mean, just because a buyer is only looking for 1 high end watch, doesn’t mean they can’t afford it, for a lot of people, it’s just a lifestyle choice, or they simply can’t justify collecting, and would rather buy other things. But I agree, if the reason a person can only purchase 1 is because they can’t afford to, the Rolex is objectively a terrible choice.

[@totisanchez3607]

At the price of the Rolex id get a Blancpain

[@stevendwilson1297]

That Sea Dweller is so beautiful. Just the red text sets it off perfectly. That dive extension on the bracelet with the engraved Rolex coronet!! Ooooof! I bought the new Omega 300m diver in black and red finish and it is truly amazing quality for the price. Even has the display back too but there’s just a magic pull towards Rolex that is irresistible. The fact that they’re almost impossible to get new somehow adds to the mystique. They sure know how to market a product and create desirability..

[@davidofglenbrook4487]

This is the finest dive watch Rolex has ever crafted. It is perhaps the finest dive watch in the world.

[@impexRQ]

🤣🤣🤣 hace you ever heard of Patek Philippe, Audemars Piguet, A Lange & Söhne, Glashütte??? 🤣🤣

[@aaronweiss7765]

Rodrigo Quintero Bejarano they don’t really make dive watches. They make better watches then Rolex for sure but Rolex is the king of dive watches. I might have agreed if you said Blancpain as they are the granddaddy. Lol

[@Kisara556NATO]

Thanks for including that lume shot at the last minute! So many reviewers on KZbin fail to show the lume.

[@the1916companywatchreviews]

Lume shots for dive watches are essential. I've been including lume shots since I received an upgrade in staff support to stitch and prepare the videos. Best, Tim

[@fpoynton1604]

Both are state of the art masterpieces of design history and function that will easily a lifetime. I would just feel much safer with the Omega as my one watch to travel the world with and as my everyday wear - its everything you could ever want with none of the downsides of a highly conspicuous Rolex. The Rolex is absolutely awesome - but i just couldnt take it anyplace. Imho - such notoriety while well deserved - its just not welcome with me on the road - . But - I do like them both allot. 👍.

[@tomtomd.6841]

Absolutely right, Sir. I own them both, I love them both, but I almost only wear the omega on my wrist, it`s much more relaxed. Best regards, Tom / Germany

[@diegom.8773]

I own them both too, i cannot say wich is better

[@teecchnoboy]

I have a OMEGA Planet Ocean 2020 with calibre 8900 black dial and bezel very beautiful and very well built solid watch best watch ever OMEGA PO

[@stevealperstein8836]

Good review but 1 correction, the Omega accuracy is guaranteed 0 to +5.

[@sidneyt1016]

I just purchased the Omega PO. Decided on this over the Omega Seamaster 300m because of bracelet and overall looks. The watch wears well despite the thickness. The Omega I think looks better, better movement and I got for 20% off retail. That’s a $6460.00 dollar difference compared to Seadweller and almost $4000.00 when considering Submariner. With the savings, better quality and the games Rolex ADs are playing, there’s no comparison.

[@algorithm007ify]

Omega’s lume, visibility (i.e., AR coating) and movement are better here...Rolex’s bracelet, WR rating and auto HE escapement valve are better.. You really can’t go wrong with either watch...except the Omega is a lot cheaper and better bang for buck.

[@the1916companywatchreviews]

The Omega offers better value by almost every measure. It doesn't feel like a watch that costs roughly half the price of the Rolex. I have to admit that my value winner would be a Seamaster Diver 300M if we expand the field, and for the nearly $14,000 preowned price of the Rolex, I'm would be be shopping a Blancpain Fifty Fathoms lightly pre-owned. Best, Tim

[@mcstarling07]

@@the1916companywatchreviews Tim, Id have to agree. I picked up a Seamaster 300 myself. The 9 link bracelet is like silk and the dial catches my attention throughout the day. The helium escape valve doesn't bother me and, personally, adds to the charm. People know a Seamaster when they see it because of that nub.

[@algorithm007ify]

mcstarling07 I would also ...love the new Seamasters...

[@MrDucatiV4]

That Omega is Beautiful! 🔥🔥🔥

[@deanmarshall1270]

I own the Omega Plant and an Aqua Terra. never had a problem with thickness of the Planet Ocean, wear the AT with a suit and the PO as casual. both good quality and value. Never even see a Rolex in a shop and doubt I ever will. So don't even consider them a viable purchase. not the best comparison. considering the difference in price and availability. Keep the blogs coming, so of the best and most informative on KZbin.

[@gpearce11]

Dean Marshall You make an excellent point that I’ve stated several times. These are casual watches, and really aren’t designed to be worn with suits/dress shirts. As a result the thickness of the PO 600 isn’t that much of a big deal (although I do admit no one would complain if it was thinner). If you’re being swayed towards the Rolex purely because it will slide under a cuff better, I have two things to say. Firstly, at over 15mm the Sea-Dweller will still struggle with a short cuff (just less than the Omega). Get the Submariner or SM Diver 300M if you really want a dress diver. Secondly, the Rolex costs more than double the Omega at retail, so just use the extra money to buy an Aqua Terra or Globemaster (I too am partial to the AT), and you have a perfect two watch collection. Heck, if we compared their resale prices you could even throw in the new steel Tresor, alongside the PO and AT, if you want something really thin (although in that case I’d probably replace the AT with a Speedy Pro for a nice and diverse collection).

[@mirasga]

People who can afford these watches are wealthy enough to have their dress shirts tailored to accomodate thick watches. The cannot fit under a cuff argument is moot especially when James Bond can pull it off. 😂

[@gpearce11]

mirasga True, although even then there is a reason Bond switched to an SMP with his tux in Casino Royale, and an Aqua Terra when wearing a suit in Skyfall and Spectre. Even for Bond the Planet Ocean is a bit big. If you definitely want a dive watch to go with your suit, then the cheaper versions of either of these are the way to go (namely Submariner and SM Diver 300M), and are both great options.

[@scubadiversworld7337]

Did you try putting water on the Tudor Pelagos's Bezel and did you find it jamming...

[@stevenuk]

Omega! I prefer the Omega, it is better value and quick hour set is cool. The Rolex needs to lose the Submariner cyclops and come back down to 40mm or even 41mm.

[@oceanspringer1]

Why not just buy a submariner then? The PO at 44mm is huge. Ive had both and I prefer the SD43.

[@joetrujillo639]

I’m a big Omega fan but chose the Submariner over Omega’s divers. I can’t help but want the Planet Ocean still. It’s a great watch.

[@jumboJetPilot]

I can see your reflection off the flat, non-AR treated Sea Dweller. Plus the crystal protrudes higher than the bezel. Rolex crystals are very unrefined. That of itself is a deal killer on a >$10K watch.

[@the1916companywatchreviews]

It's an issue, but I think Rolex made the right choice not to AR-coat the outside of the crystal. Now, regarding the camber of the crystal itself, yes, it's very flat. I'm not sure whether that creates an eye-sight problem, a camera problem, or both.There's no issue reading it flush, but this does look pretty bad on camera. Best, Tim

[@jumboJetPilot]

WatchBox Reviews I can forgive the lack of AR PVD. But how it’s flat and protrudes - less forgivable. I have a friend of mine who owned his new GMT Master less than one week when the metal tongue of a recoiling seat belt clipped and chipped the side of the protruding crystal. $400 and six weeks down the drain...

[@rsaumeii]

Omega 101%

[@dmntuba]

Well done and thanks for sharing. As far as the watches go, they are both fantastic and I believe I would be happy with either 🙂

[@MrDaymien1]

The tapered lugs on the 43 really give the pre 40 mm ceramic Rolex look, its pretty hard to beat . Hight on the 43 is high any higher becomes a door frame magnet . Cant wait to see the yacht master in stainless, that will b perfection .

[@the1916companywatchreviews]

I'm also awaiting a steel/platinum version of this year's Yacht-Master 42. That will become the sporting Rolex to own when it bows. Best, Tim

[@andrewtlk]

I sold my SD43 for a limited edition Blancpain Fifty Fathoms. I don't miss the Rolex. The Blancpain is just something else. When I was wearing the SD43, I only looked at it to check the time, even when new. With the FF, I'm stealing glances at it just to admire it. It's a personal thing I guess.

[@gpearce11]

Andrew Toh Exactly! The Rolex SD might be a good watch at retail, but for the amount it trades at on resale (the only way to get one), you’d be way better off getting a Blancpain for that money. An excellent choice on your part, and I’m glad you’re enjoying it.

[@dazzystart]

I'll have both. If I had to choose it would be the Omega cause it's blue.

[@gpearce11]

That's actually an excellent point that is often unappreciated in these Omega v. Rolex comparisons; you get way more variety from Omega. If you're someone that considers a black dial to be too boring, then literally no new Rolex dove watch will suit you (except maybe the Deep-sea), and if you love blue specifically, then you need to pay exorbitant amounts for a gold model. The PO600, by comparison, is available in black, black and orange, blue, white and orange, and grey and orange (Ti), and is also available with a bracelet, rubber strap, rubber backed leather strap, or a NATO strap, depending on your preference.

[@carguy3645]

I would chose and I have chosen the Omega. Any day all day every day of the week. I own the Omega Planet Ocean Chronograph in black with SS Bracelet. I absolutely love my watch. The look, the fit, the feel and the overall quality clearly beats the Rolex by leaps and bounds. The Omega is and always will continue to be just the better made and built watch. Just looking at the case back of the Omega DESTROYS the Rolex. Yet.....people still want a Rolex. If you are a flipper and you want to make money, sure get a Rolex, but if you can clearly see and know quality then its the Omega all day long. Its just the better watch all day.

[@the1916companywatchreviews]

Well, I own an Omega Seamaster and no Rolex, so I suppose I'm with you in the "real world." Best, Tim

[@MatthewPaul.]

If I could purchase the Rolex SD43 @ retail then sure. I wouldn’t want to pay the mark up. Money could be used to purchase another watch to have fun with. That being said I would go with the PO.

[@Nexus.Achiles]

Rolex are able to produce a thinner watch that can go twice as deep as the Omega. I own the original PO 45.5 since 2005 and the SD43 since 2017. I am tempted to add this blue PO 43.5, but I don't like the absence of a date quickest. I sold a Speedy 44 cal 9900 partly because of this, I just quit setting up the date after a while, which looked bad.

[@ir739]

If you don't mind me asking, which would you say is more comfortable to wear between the two? I own the PO XL as well and I've been eyeballing the SD43 for a while now but I'm a bit worried about people saying it's not comfortable due to the protruding caseback and thickness. To me the poxl is very comfortable especially on rubber... Could you draw a comparison for me between the two as far as comfort? Thanks a lot

[@Nexus.Achiles]

@@ir739 I read that some forum members (TRF, WUS) complain about discomfort with the SD43, but they have small wrists. On my flat 7in wrist it sits nicely and never feels uncomfortable. My PO2500 45.5 on the other hand has a very wide caseback, which ends up rubbing against my wrist bone. Worn every single day can become slightly uncomfy with the PO, although I wore it 7 years straight. You need to try the SD43 on your own wrist and see how it sits.

[@cwugrad396]

The two reasons I prefer the Rolex is the cyclops and lack of numbers on the face. Both excellent watches.

[@ryanpatterson9526]

Omega is 1/3 the price of the Rolex on the open market.

[@dasmesser1]

Correct. This Rolex is currently 15k, you can get this Planet Ocean for 4.5k, you could add a 1861 Speedmaster for 5k and also a Globemaster for another 5k. So the question really is, do you want a Rolex or a 3 watch collection including a diver, chronograph and formal piece from Omega.

[@greekatso]

Both excellent watches. I used to own the 8500 Planet Ocean in 45.5 mm, have since sold it and now have the SD43.

[@ir739]

If you don't mind, which would you say is more comfortable? I have the PO XL as well and looking at the omega, however I've been reading they're not very comfortable due to caseback protrusion and height. I have 7.5 inch wrists and the poxl is very comfortable to me especially on rubber. Could you draw a comparison for me on what it feels like to wear both? Any better than the other?

[@greekatso]

@@ir739 I definitely prefer the SD43, I've also read of people having fitment issues due to the protruding caseback. I personally don't have any issues with it and find it comfortable since I'm used to bigger watches like the PO back when I had it. The one advantage of the PO is that it looks better on other straps, whereas the SD43 looks best on the bracelet. My wrist is similar size, about 7.75". Try it on if you're able to and see what you think.

[@richardgreen8919]

Another superlative review.Two outstanding watches.You really cannot go wrong with either.Take care and stay safe.

[@fan-jo2je]

I own both😀 but I am thinking of getting rid of the SD for a Batman

[@TZOID08]

Good luck finding one at an AD for retail..... and Rolex is rumored to be having a price increase. Arrogant Pricks

[@JR-nl3mh]

I own both and would line to get a Batman.

[@SavedbybGrace]

Fantastic review, thanks Tim. I own both of these, albeit the updated SD43, and the PO in black. I’m no collector my only other watch is an Oris. The Planet Ocean is a watch I’ve really enjoyed wearing from new. It looks fantastic, comfy on the wrist despite the size and keeps great time. I’ll never sell it. And as much as I like the Omega I can make the same comments about the Rolex, and more!!! Keeping this one for life also. Just a superb watch.. And if I’m honest, I’ll also say that I get a hit just from knowing I’m rocking a Rolex on my wrist… It makes me feel just great… You can’t put a dollar value on that.

[@MJMImages]

METAS is 0/+5 not standard COSC. OMEGA all day long for half the price.

[@horses343]

Omega for life

[@johnnyv673]

I don't like the valve on the Omega

[@plexiform1973]

I have both these watches (although my planet ocean model is the GMT). I enjoy wearing the omega more than the SD43. The chunkiness of the PO is my favorite part. I disagree about the omega not being an all the time watch. I can wear mine all the time. The fit and finish is superb for both watches. The Rolex is just more expensive and more luxurious because of the mystique surrounding the Rolex brand. The GMT PO has a bidirectional bezel and every click feels perfect. If you want the best bang for buck in luxury watches I don’t think you can go wrong with the Omega Planet Ocean GMT or any PO model for that matter.

[@alanturner7654]

Omega for me the bracelet is far better than the rolex

[@spr7589]

The higher difference between the two is that you can have one now for the recommended price and the other in 15 years, maybe, for a unknown price….

[@kennethmackellar2032]

Omega for the win.🏆🥇

[@markd7922]

I own a James Cameron, went to see this PO at the AD and I’m grabbing one very soon. Very impressed and felt great on the wrist!

[@VicharB]

For the price - Omega. It also has better tech. Just wish it came in 42mm.

[@gpearce11]

Vichar B. Technically the dial/bezel is 42mm, with the extra 1.5mm comes from the cushion case around the crown. So it would actually be a 42mm watch if it had regular crown guards like the Rolex or SMP.

[@VicharB]

@@gpearce11 Yes, but I checked at the dealer, is on a bigger side for me. I already have PO 8500 42mm, so was able to compare. I haven't seen, yet, 39.5mm version, maybe that will be of liking.

[@gpearce11]

Vichar B. It’s definitely still a big watch, no doubt, and the extra thickness from the introduction on the display caseback doesn’t help it. I’ve seen quite a few wrist shot of the 39.5mm that show it doesn’t wear as small as it’s size suggests, so checking it out might be a good idea. It slimmer, at about 14.5mm too, as it uses the 8800 caliber (55h PR, quickset date instead of hour) found in the Diver 300M.

[@scubadiversworld7337]

That Rolex Helium Escape Valve seems to be sitting a bit proud. It looks like it is in need of attention. My identical Sea Dweller's valve is flush to the case.

[@loukasantoniou8054]

i ll be commenting that every time..master chronometre:0 to 5s per day and omega has that and actually most omega watches are even better and you know that cause omega gives you a card of your specific watch specs after test..so omega is more accurate..omeg is a better watch for me

[@gpearce11]

loukas antoniou I too prefer METAS certification over Superlative Chronometer. While -0/+5 is technically no better than -2/+2, is rather a watch that runs 3 seconds fast than one that runs 1 second slow, as it’s way easier to reset the time (just hack the second hand for 3 seconds). I also appreciate that METAS certification includes accuracy guarantees at low power reserve, and is certified after the watch is caused, so there’s no chance of accidents happening between certification and casing.

[@SP-pn7xx]

For me, PO43 beats the Submariner, but not the SD43.

[@gpearce11]

SP For me or would be the other way around. The Submariner is both smaller and especially much thinner, making it one of the few dive watches that can truely be worn with a suit, making it a great “one watch”, and the winner in a Sub vs PO matchup (this is coming from an Omega fanboy btw). The SD loses both these details, especially as it’s much thicker than the Sub, allowing the noticeably better value PO to claw back into the lead in this comparison.

[@oceanspringer1]

@@gpearce11 When they offer the new Sub this year at Basel, I may agree. Having both, the SD43 is the perfection of the submariner.

[@marcdee4427]

Omega have the ceramic dial

[@hhanjali]

Light in your videos needs to be improved

[@the1916companywatchreviews]

I agree with this. I do what I can with the equipment I'm given. Best, Tim

[@JBlakeS23]

The escape valves really set these two apart. The omega’s looks like a wart. Rolex all day and wouldn’t think twice about it.

[@scottlalonde2878]

Great comparison from a year ago, thank you Tim. Love them both, like allot of comments, but the PO just speaks to me. To me, the SD needs a larger dial, more narrow bezel, and date further from center. If that means creating a larger calendar wheel, so be it.

[@wjohnsonism]

Both fantastic pieces however, @ 9:16....Rolex clasp, huge advantage.

[@mirasga]

Omega clasp is also adjustable.

[@wjohnsonism]

mirasga True, but for me, the beak and hook mechanism on the Rolex looks like it would provide that extra edge of security.

[@speedmaster534]

I have SD43 and planet ocean chrono mc.I love both watchs but total quality of rolex is freaking out!

[@the1916companywatchreviews]

That was evident while I was filming the video. The Omega has integrity, but the Rolex feels its price premium in the hand and on the wrist. Best, Tim

[@Oakleyworld]

@@the1916companywatchreviews exactly, people usually have an opinion just by videos but when its in your hands and studying it, i always find that Rolex quality is superior.

[@gyang333]

I prefer the Submariner over the Omega divers, but the PO definitely wins out against the SD43 for me.

[@gpearce11]

George Yang I’m a bit of an Omega fanboy, who honestly prefers the Diver 300M and PO600 to either the Sub or SD, even for the same price. However even I’m willing to admit that the smaller 40mm and thinner 12.5mm Submariner is a better choice for a lot of people (provided money isn’t an issue). That being said, the larger size, and especially noticeably increased thickness of the SD basically remove it’s only advantages for me to recommend it literally anybody.

[@ripperx444]

love them both! I owned them both at same time. I sold the sea-dweller because of cash and kept the omega. I love the omega just as much

[@the1916companywatchreviews]

Thanks ripperx444! If you have a quick second, click through to our site and write a review of your watches. Our customers love to read about real world experience when shopping on our website. Here are the links: www.thewatchbox.com/shop/Rolex-Sea-Dweller-126600.html www.thewatchbox.com/shop/Omega-Seamaster-215-30-44-21-03-001.html Thanks in advance!

[@ir739]

If you don't mind me asking, which would you say is more comfortable to wear between the two? I own the PO XL as well and I've been eyeballing the SD43 for a while now but I'm a bit worried about the fact that people say it's not comfortable due to the protruding caseback and thickness. I find the poxl supremely comfortable especially on rubber. Could you draw a comparison for me between the two as far as comfort? 7.5 wrists here. Thanks!

[@ripperx444]

@@ir739 the deep sea is one of the most comfortable for my wrist because I always remove the large dive extension from it. I haven’t tried the new one on yet with the new breclete as I don’t like Rolex anymore! PO is probably mode comfortable overall due to weight.

[@allee6337]

I have both. My omega is my everyday baby. My Seadweller is my flex watch.

[@KenS99]

Thank you for the direct comparison and including all the relevant details. I would be okay with a longer video at a slower pace (I found myself waiting for you to take breaths).

[@omegaknight01]

Two titans!!!

[@the1916companywatchreviews]

It was a good shootout. There's no real "loser" here, just different strengths and weaknesses for each. Best, Tim

[@zingliangtan7110]

Rolex always my choice over omega

[@andrei2023]

Omega for me♎️♎️♎️

[@MrManstrom]

I’m already on the waiting list for the sd43. 😊

[@the1916companywatchreviews]

Hang in there; it will be worth the wait! Best, Tim

[@MrManstrom]

Today I’ve got the call from my ad, I will pick the sd43 up this week. 😊

[@henrywest7217]

I'm enchanted by both.

[@tygaz3061]

SD43 all day everday... not even close

[@andrewbrown5636]

I have the SD43, but I’d rather have a Blancpain FF

[@andrewtlk]

I sold my SD43 for a limited FF. I don't miss the Rolex. The FF is just something special.

[@oceanspringer1]

@@andrewtlk The Nageurs de Combat is amazing. The build quality is something special. If purchased aftermarket, BP's offer incredible value for the money (same for H. Moser). If purchased new, you will lose your rear if you do try and sell later.

[@iliastasikas9553]

OMEGA WINS!!!

[@bbbpandan6473]

New Rolex after market value decline 15% due to tradewar and Hong Kong economy crisis. Previously Rolex batman in Hong Kong can sold USD16k to 17k. Now people can buy USD14k. Next year will cheaper or maybe shortlisting for new set of Rolex watch in outlet.

[@bbbpandan6473]

Dude, I mean not now as crisis happened just 4 months passed. Wait a year or maybe next year. Probably the listing will loose a bit. But now we can get the price 15% lower by third party shop.

[@americanjedi5721]

I have owned both, and I choose the SD50, (AKA Vader) by a mile❗️

[@petertaylor1213]

In my humble opinion the Omega is hands down the better watch. The latest 8900 master chronometer movement is just fantastic. I have owned 3 Rolex both the Kermit LV and the Hulk LV Then a GMT They are great watches. But please the price has gone crazy I even bought my son a V series 16600 sea dweller for his 21st. Rolex are without any doubt the kings of marketing within the watch world. But better than Omega Master Chronometer. NO they can’t hold a candle to this fantastic movement. Originally designed by George Daniels ( the greatest horologist of modern times ) the Omega Master Chronometer is technically way better as a movement and. Again in my humble opinion as a watch. And let’s not forget the value when compared to the Rolex. Buy right and you can make money on both. But Rolex prices are way to high for what they are.

[@kevorknourian5442]

Both stunning for me it’s the Rolex

[@rodriguezahr]

Design purist would have a hard time swallowing the busyness of Omega design approach. This is too much of unbalanced touches in my opinion most flagrant one is the helium escape crown! SD all day and night.

[@the1916companywatchreviews]

Omega's best dive watch likely is the 2019 Seamaster Diver 300M Black Ceramic. Proportions are handsome, the dial is clean, and the He valve is the only real visual tick Best, Tim

[@gpearce11]

Other than the He Valve, which at least serves a purpose, the dial of the PO is a remarkably faithful reinterpretation of the ‘60s Mil-Seamaster, so I’m not sure design purists will have a problem with it. Also, many that appreciate good design detest the unfinished/rushed design of the cyclops on Rolex. If you want a date magnifier, do it properly under the crystal (like Panerai), not by glueing a hideous wart to the dial.

[@rodriguezahr]

@@gpearce11 Good point. I think Rolex use of the Cyclope is intentional, this cyclone when seen on a watch crystal has become an immediate identification to the brand. I'm sure the fact they still use it today is because of that and not because of the lack of other options to do it otherwise. It's like the fluted bezel, you see one from a distance and you think Rolex before thinking anything else. Think of the double kidneys on BMW front ends :-)

[@gpearce11]

Rodrigue Zahr That’s definitely the reason. It was a good idea in theory, yet poorly executed, but it became so distinctive that Rolex is never going to change it. Again we see Omega doing the same thing with the He Valve. Omega added it to provide difference between their divers and everyone else, and it works (you can spot a PO or SMP across a room as a result), so they’re unlikely to ever remove it. It ends up coming down to personal preference. Some, such as myself, have no issue with the He Valve, yet hate the cyclops. Others despise the He Valve for being ugly and unnecessary, yet find the cyclops very useful (especially if they have poor eyesight).

[@rodriguezahr]

Geoffrey Pearce makes put in this way the HE valve makes sense now. I personally don’t like very tiny date windows, I struggle to see the date on my Tudor GMT, maybe that’s why I enjoy looking at Rolex’s Cyclopes :-)

[@kanondegeminis8747]

I like Rolex but i dont want to get robbed

[@LanguagesWithAndrew]

The Omega would be the easy winner if it weren't so damn thick. It would also be nice if they'd get rid of the helium escape valve, and I mean just plain *get rid of it* , not tone it down so it's like that of the Rolex. Nobody buying these watches actually has any intent of ever doing the sort of diving that would require it (and if they did they wouldn't be wearing a watch like that down there anyway as that sort of diving nowadays is entirely commercial and who the hell is going to wear a $5k watch down to the diving bell where they'll be working for 2 weeks as a welder for an oil company?!).

[@user-gm8hd5mf8k]

Omega

[@lilpapi4399]

If you swapped the brand labels on the watches then I bet the outcome of this review would not even be close… Let’s be honest, Rolex goggles are real. PO is a better watch.

[@MeMe-ll4tp]

Omega all the way .

[@marcusnns]

ROLEX!❗️

[@Sr33566]

The thing about the Rolex is... the price. You can get a seamaster 600 and a speedmaster moonwatch and still have some money left for dinner.

[@coconutmango9519]

Omega...watch made not just for today, but also for the future. A-magnetic, METAS certified, better time keeping (0 to +5 secs per day), better time keeping rate (more stable due to the twin barrel). 100% Omega over the Rolex. AND VERY LITTLE MARKETING from the Omega. Rolex is the champion at marketing.

[@maitrehg]

Omega of course.

[@marklawrence855]

ROLEX ALL DAY LONG

[@AustinB747]

Thanks for the video - price no object - Rolex (but Omega is soooo close for 2nd place)!

[@firebearva]

Damn flippers.

[@deonlouw3863]

I sold my sub for an Omega - risk of theft is too great. Love my Omega’s

[@TZOID08]

He has a 6.29" wrist for anyone wondering........... He always says 16 cm like Americans know what that is .

[@arjankindermans]

Of all the countries in the world, only three still use the archaic Imperial system of weights and measures: Liberia. Myanmar (a.k.a. “the country formerly known as Burma”) United States of America.

[@deanmarshall1270]

You sill use the metric system? WOW! don't tape measures come with centimetres on them?

[@tube-sc1rs]

Omeaga makes watches ; Rolex sells watches. classic

[@kanondegeminis8747]

And stabbed!!😢😢

[@williamstalvey6920]

Just a great looking Omega, finally Omega doesnt have those ridicoulous skeleton hands like so many if their dive watches...but I never would go against Rolex in this comparison. Always, go with Rolex....better value and much more demand.

[@MsGman598]

Better value?? 11 / 12k for a second hand one. Because you're not buying a new one at retail. Omega better value for me👍

[@williamstalvey6920]

@@MsGman598 yeah, love Omega but 7 years down the road, you will make a profit....I do love the omega 600 planet ocean, I have deep sea and 600 m ..both incredibly tough

[@mattchedzey]

@@williamstalvey6920 what's demand got to do with it? Buy what you like - not what the masses are chasing.

[@jimbeam4111]

Prefer the sea dweller without the cyclops.

[@DavidDatura]

The Omega has the slightly better movement and much better value for money, but overall the Rolex wins here IMO.

[@MJMImages]

Omega all day.

[@throwawaylogin9590]

I still don't understand how people are comparing these two watches when the retail price (let's not even talk about availability) of the Rolex is nearly twice that of the Omega. It better feel more substantial and more well built! That's like comparing a $40K Honda to a $70K BMW.

[@rfpal8543]

Planet Ocean every day

[@rowanrobinson]

Omega all day

[@andrewkendall8744]

I fear these Rolex v Omega comparisons are not representative of the market. Surely someone buying a 4 grand watch isn’t comparing it to any Rolex. They’re both exceptional watches at their price point, and the Rolex is just the watch the Omega guy wishes he could afford.

[@TECHFIGHTER]

Agreed. The Rolex v Omega comparisons are not representative of the market. However, someone buying an Omega is most definitely comparing it to it's comparable Rolex. They're both exceptional watches but only is the Omega exceptional at it's price point as the Rolex is just exceptional. The Rolex is the watch the Omega guy would buy if the Omega did not already provide comparable quality at a much more impressive price point.

[@jimbeam4111]

I would disagree. Every bozo walking down the street has a sub or gmt. So Rolex has become the watch of people who pretend to have wealth.

[@andrewkendall8744]

True. But you still need to able to drop 12 grand in the first place. If you can’t afford to put food on the table afterwards, you have other problems.

[@jimbeam4111]

Andrew Kendall dropping 12 grand is easy for anyone. Financing is easily obtained. The food on the table part. Well that’s were the government comes in. When gang bangers and rappers are wearing Rolex’s that’s when I look elsewhere.Rolex has become a brand of bling not sophistication. The Rolex to buy is an explorer 1 or 2. No one should be buying a watch or anything else to give off the perception of wealth.

[@mirasga]

More Rolex fakes out there. 😉

[@jeffm4349]

Time to shave your arm, wolfman.

[@algorithm007ify]

Men have hair on their arms...

[@90210Skye]

Men don't shave their bodies.

[@Anonymouslyme1]

Loving all the Rolex haters on here 🤣 The Rolex keeps far better time and is nowhere near as thick. The brand prestige and investment prospects far exceed the omega. It is superior, goodbye.

[@justreallybored6014]

I hate the cyclops eye. Aesthetically ugly and lets be honest none of us are using this to dive 2000ft down.

[@sac_fijian6314]

The good thing about the Omega is if you happen to be in a 3rd world country or island, you'll walk out with your limb in tact. For a Rolex, they won't hesitate to hack off your arm and walk off with it.