Rolex Vs. Omega - Which is the Better Watch?

[@luke9437]

Omegas are lowkey and classy. It's a watch brand worn by professional individuals not concerned with showing off to the masses.

[@jakubircow6875]

You can service Omega less often due to the coaxial movement actually and the movement keeps better time

[@hugohernandez3651]

Own both. Love both. There is no need to choose for me.

[@MrElvin026]

Rolex sell watches, Omega make watches

[@cecaju9516]

Omega make watches that don’t sell. Great for fans of the brand to get them at a discount.

[@satnavguy]

I'm an Omega watch guy every time just love there watches

[@CiocanaTrader]

Their

[@Matys1975]

I’ll be honest. When I go to the watch store and compare Rolex models side by side next to Omegas, I don’t understand why Rolex costs more. It seems like it should be the other way around. Just an honest opinion

[@thetruthhurts7500]

Shall I suggest a visit to your eye doctor?

[@gustavoheberle6265]

Don’t judge a book by its cover! The difference is what’s inside…

[@Sumerdini]

Omega is much better brand than Rolex & Longines is much better brand than Tudor...

[@Sumerdini]

@@gustavoheberle6265omega's inside is much better

[@impoautosguatemala9847]

​@gustavoheberle6265 do ub even know about watches haha omega is far superior in movements and complications.

[@ALL-il1sw]

Complications - Omega Accuracy - Omega (sorry its not close like this salesman wants you to believe) History - Omega Design - It's subjective Size - it's subjective Innovation - Omega Marketing - Rolex Branding - Rolex Sales - Rolex Build quality - Omega Ultimately its about how you place value

[@LarrySealeArcheryCoach]

In all of my anecdotal experience, Omega is way more accurate than Rolex

[@cecaju9516]

@@ALL-il1sw accuracy is close, but Rolex guaranteed nominal range is 20% tighter than Omega. Build quality is pretty even from my experience, but you’d need warranty return data to make an objective claim. What about wearability, case thickness, bracelet construction/adjustability/comfort? Rolex has the edge in all those areas. Re-sale value? Huge edge to Rolex (despite the nonsensical argument that real watch lovers don’t care about money). One big win for Omega that you omitted was anti-magnetism. Before you call me a Rolex fan boy, note that I own both brands and like them both and would buy both again.

[@ALL-il1sw]

@@cecaju9516 don't just look at the accuracy results, you need to look at testing parameters. Rolex test their watches in the best possible conditions in order to get the best results, which is also against industry standards. METAS specifically test the watches in the worst possible conditions, to challenge the movement. Even though Rolex get better results (just) the accuracy standard from METAS is the higher standard. I deliberately didn't argue for case size, thickness and wear ability because it's so subjective. Personally I find the Sub too small, yet I can accept that you might see the SMP as too big, we come in different shapes and sizes and have different preferences so how do we objectively say one is better. You mentioned bracelet construction, how do you objectively measure that? Resale value is such a fickle concept. I can't argue against Rolex's resale being good. (Now). But it would be remiss of anyone to ignore that this could change, drastically very quickly if it was missmanaged. I won't call it hype, but from what I can see resale value will always be boosted by popularity and scarcity, yet Rolex produces a large number of products every year, what would happen if the balance between popularity and scarcity was out. What I'm trying to say here, is it would be wrong to assume and rely on strong resale value.

[@ALL-il1sw]

@@cecaju9516 don't just look at the results of the test. You need to look at how Rolex change the testing parameters (contrary to industry standards) and how that helps them get the narrower results. It starts to become clear it's not close at all, and not in Rolex's favor. A lot of what you said seems subjective to me, I personally find the Sub too small. It doesn't mean it is too small, it's just not to my preference, I accept that others will prefer differently. How do you measure bracelet construction? Resale value can be fickle, is it something that should be relied upon, what if the popularity/scarcity ratio became unbalance? Could the resale value be effected?

[@mapled3135]

The reason why watchmakers like to work on Rolex movements better is because they are way easier to work on. Rolexes movements have been the same for ages. Omega innovations are constantly changing the landscape.

[@ALL-il1sw]

Don't forget the chumps who over pay for a Rolex will over pay for a service

[@cecaju9516]

@@ALL-il1sw Omega service is more expensive. You can take a Rolex to any watch maker and get it serviced. Fewer watchmakers can service Co-axial movements.

[@ALL-il1sw]

@@cecaju9516 That doesn't surprise me, Rolex is a simpler movement than the coaxial.

[@cecaju9516]

@ As are all Swiss lever escapements used on the majority of mechanical watches ever produced and produced today by most brands including Patek, AP, JLC, and Rolex.

[@ALL-il1sw]

@@cecaju9516 for basic movements sure, but once you start adding in complications, the cost of service will go up. The coaxial is not exactly a simple movement even though a simple 3 hander will have it.

[@lirrfan3879]

Have them both. Love them both.

[@Thatguy-zh1ln]

Omega is for watch enthusiasts, rolex is for people who want a rolex

[@seanlukecorroon]

Omega for me 👍 Rolex had to play catch up with Omega movement specifications.

[@timb8095]

Engineering vs marketing

[@Snowkone81]

100% agree. And Omega has more diversity in their lineup. But marketing/advertising works and Rolex is the prime example of that. Had my hands on various models of both from friends, end up buying multiple Omega before bothering the wait list or grey market for Rolex. But to each their own - both great watch brands.

[@wqsnsr8]

100%

[@bartsplaylists]

What about design or case size? Rolex has been creating their most popular models around 40 mm case size (better for most people) whereas omega is 42mm. Furthermore, the rolex design has been copied so much that it has become iconic (owning the original, not the copy). Omega is copied a lot less from a design perspective. Rolex collection is more curated (Less models available), whereas there are so many different omega speed masters. This lowers the perceived value of each individual model and some of the icon status. If you do this accross the catalog, it also decreases the brand perception. Etc etc

[@patrickjean-philippe7679]

Precisely ☝🏽

[@mbell7498]

Being a person who has exclusive things does not necessarily mean being a person who has good taste. Right? This is why I find exclusivity overrated.

[@allanrico021]

Omega all the way

[@masterwatch]

good video and good points.. if I have to chose though I'm probably going to go Omega as the only Rolex that I would like is the Seadweller or Deepsea.

[@patrickjean-philippe7679]

1) Styling. I much prefer Omega. I see Rolex as bland. 2) Thickness. I vote for slimmer so Rolex wins here. 3) Calibres. I like the idea of George Daniel’s Co-axial escapment and Metas certification and it’s reliable vs the Rolex Chronergy which has been plagued with amplitude/timekeeping issues since release in 2015. So at this point I vote Omega. 4) Bracelets. I prefer more discreet less flashy not loud so Omega. 5) Clasps. Rolex micro adjust wins here. 6) Value retention. I buy a watch because it looks good to me. I can afford depreciation so it’s a moot point for me. Rolex is surely better for people who are tighter in this respect. Conclusion: Rolex and Omega propose different products to the market, these products are marketed differently and project different images. It’s up to each person to make up their own personal selection and choices. These preferences will always remain subjective even if Rolex has the masses preference because it shouts louder and has been doing so since inception. Omega built watches whereas Rolex outsourced their manufacturing and was stellar with publicity and sales i.e. what is marketing today. Rolex has since become an independent manufacturer.

[@qv81]

Omega.

[@thetruthhurts7500]

Nope

[@zbla13]

Can you next do: Seiko vs Citizen? And Grand Seiko and The Citizen?

[@erik5024]

I've worn my Omega 2234.50 GMT with speedy bracelet every day for 20 years. Never regretted the purchase, and I think its as beautiful as the day I bought it. I would trade it for a Sea Dweller without hesitation.

[@Leftystrat]

2 boxes of matches side by side , one has Rolex on the cover the other has omega , which box would you take?

[@pormusic]

@@Leftystrat if I can sell it? Rolex. To keep: Omega.

[@themis3201]

Owner of both. Just love both for different reasons. Why choose ?

[@GavinElliott-hu9wp]

You and your content is so good that I hardly watch other grey market videos

[@chuckgladfelter]

I've never owned a Rolex, but my experience with Tudor is that they are very accurate. Omega is about the same for accuracy as Tudor. My favorite watch in my collection is an orange bezel, white dial 43.5mm Planet Ocean.

[@hawkofarabia1013]

Why did you ignore one of the most important part when it comes to watches that is Finishing .. no one on earth will say rolex has better finishing than omega when comparing side by side .. i own both

[@anthonyamato6367]

Does Omega still use plastic parts in their movements?

[@patrickjean-philippe7679]

Noooooo 😱😱😱🤯

[@JoeKyser]

What is that thumbnail

[@venrocking]

I think both brands are great. Value retention only matters if you buy new. If you fine with pre-owned Omega just offers so much bang for buck. Rolex on the other hand is more refined in terms of daily wear (bracelet, clasp, bezel sound) imho.

[@Matys1975]

Value retention only matters when you buy a watch you don’t love, cause if you loved it you would never sell it

[@venrocking]

@@Matys1975 I loved all watches I bought, but some of the love fades out over time, and you move on.

[@hugohernandez3651]

​@Matys1975 Not every collector is the same. I am not a watch hoarder. If I don't wear a watch, it has to go. Additionally, my taste changes. Value retention should not be the main driver when buying a watch, but it matters.

[@patrickjean-philippe7679]

Or if you buy a watch you can’t really afford…

[@audiman7716]

I have multiple from both brands and it’s honestly a tie. Rolex crapped the bed with their 32xx calibers. All 6 of mine have gone back at least once for warranty work but my 31xx movements are bulletproof

[@EdmundPorter-ju8kd]

You can take most Omega’s home before the Rapture. I really like Explorer I & 1908 (I’ll never have a 1908) & Omega DeVille’s, Railmaster (I know discontinued) & Speedy ‘57. Some of each. To each his own.

[@navegandolejanooriente6268]

I’ve owned many models of both brands and it’s up to the buyer. You can’t go wrong with either but Omega watches are just too tall on the wrist for my preference but Rolex are just too hard obtain even with good buy history and relationship with my AD so this wait list bs is getting old. I say go Omega Speedmaster, it’s just as cool as a submariner but without the fuss of waiting for “THE CALL” and the speedmaster is far more comfortable on the wrist than the new subs

[@Anonymous-ew9ip]

i will gladly wear speedy only for life if they manage to reduce their case size down to 37~39 range with the same Calibre 3861 and the same dial composition. i just don't find watches above 40 attractive at all. black speedy does have the magic to appear smaller on wrist due to the bracelet and dial color, but i just prefer the previous reduced version, and that one has different dial. i just wish.

[@weezkidtube]

When Omega stops to make dozens of iterations of Seamaster and Speedmasters, then people will get a chance to appreciate its value.

[@miabeatz80]

You don't have to take my word for it but currently there are 40+ configurations of the Daytona alone. Let's not get started with the DJ. 13 gmts. The only two models with few skews are the explorer and the sub.

[@ryanneil70]

better at what? charging people a ridiculous price for a function that sits in the corner of the screen people stare at all day anyway? its a tie

[@Fatboylo1980-l7n]

Both brands are absolutely amazing, like he said you can’t go wrong with either brand if you’re a watch lover. If yiur an investor well then you should stick to Rolex

[@niocitB]

Where are the Rolexfanboys!

[@jamied931]

Omega fanboys HATE Rolex Rolex owners usually also love omega and probably have one or a couple

[@KeepingWatchUK]

💯

[@Hrudaya07]

Very true. I am a Rolex fan who own a Rootbeer and I love Omega. Looking at the comments, the other way isn’t true.

[@TheMagicMan299]

Usually Rolex owners are more average people that don't know anything about watches. So they don't care about other brands. The enthusiast loves both brands. I own both a Speedmaster and an Explorer. What people detest is the Rolex wait list crap and the hype they build such as what they did with the Le Mans Daytona. There is a saying among watch enthusiasts: People love Rolex watches but not the Rolex as a company.

[@Mega-zi7ys]

Ahhh not true at all. It goes both ways

[@hugohernandez3651]

Absolutely. I am not an obnoxious fanboy, but I absolutely love Rolex watches. Omega offers amazing watches...great quality...cheaper...easy to get. I have both brands in my collection.

[@chief_energy5404]

well done. thank you.

[@syairazihaziq9642]

Movement tie? Hmmm

[@frankphilpot3492]

Really loved the Rolex vs. Omega Showdown Roman, great information on some of the history and movements, as well as builds of these fantastic brands. That's just a tiny bit of what was covered here in 5:27 seconds. Great episode 😊

[@KB-vf4gz]

Hands down the only reason Rolex is the king is bc of Marketing 100 million per year and that is an easy win in the marketing column. I will say you forgot to mention Omega has Bond

[@jackfeifer2501]

Once you have the value retention category, you can get rid of the affordability category,the fact that you can get a deal on a watch, but it’s going to lose 45% of its value means nothing!!you might as well pay more if you can sell it for what you paid for it… Rolex wins again

[@stephannordmann5346]

Omega for sure better quality 🎉

[@iAMboognish]

Rolex is a privately owned company who answers only to themselves. Omega is an investor owned, expensive Swatch who has to answer to investors. For Rolex watches and quality is the focus. For Omega, the bottom line is the focus. A mid-tier Seiko is a more respectable watch than almost any Omega.

[@casualarrogance]

😂

[@pormusic]

@@iAMboognish 👍🤡

[@juwadanah]

When I saw that thumbnail, I thought one of the Taskins kick Romans ass lol. Omega has some great models and excellent price point. However, Rolex to me just has so many models that I would prefer.

[@UserKR13]

Just from a design perspective, I prefer the Speedmaster over the Daytona. Everything else, Rolex is better.

[@loucaskalliantasis9370]

Love them both!

[@tomhammond4406]

Omega is great love this brand. Fun fact, Omega almost went bankrupt in the early 90’s!!! However, The past is the past!

[@vdan2879]

Both brands have its faults. Omega has unlimited limited editions. Rolex can seem boring. I have both

[@natedaniel4489]

How many baby sharks did Omega need for them dials?

[@billchan6180]

Both are good but have been priced a bit high

[@edwarddavis6827]

This was excellent and pretty much correct on everything and makes Omega relevant to the argument. There are some Omegas which are incredible. But every Rolex is an incredible watch.

[@KnieselHurtado]

Picked up a AMZWATCH's watch as my first watch last month and I’m absolutely in love with it. Perfect size, looks elegant, very comfortable. Now my only problem is holding off from buying more watches so quickly!

[@Leftystrat]

Omega are more fun than serious

[@busslayer4790]

Rolex may win the thinness category, but Omega wins thickness.

[@terryboston3292]

Omega is easier to get, they do not turn away customers, Rolex does, just like Ferrari vs Aston Martin, Ferrari almost will not sell a car to anyone, eve though you have the money, you almost have to be accepted into their list, but with Aston Martin they will gladly sell you a car.

[@thedownshiftchannel]

Omega fans online always seem to be die hard anti Rolex. I find it a bit weird it’s fine to like more than one brand. I personally on the whole prefer Rolex but both have some great options

[@seanlukecorroon]

They used to be cool before they became blingy shiny non tool watches around 2008 with the GMT ceramic that continues until today. Now Rolex is all about how much you can spend at the AD and status. I feel omega keeps that tool watch vibe, especially with the moon watches and Omega fans are more often watch enthusiasts who don’t care about value and reselling but more interested in the history, stories and adventure of watch collecting.

[@lavpatel682]

Bro but omega history is good compare to rolex bro I am omega boy bro there is no compare to speedmaster vs daytona seamaster vs submarine there is no compare rolex just export is marketing that’s it’ bro

[@Istibadits]

Elon Musk was spotted wearing an Omega Aqua Terra.

[@DGenerationX69]

I like both. Problem avoided 🤣

[@Anonymouslyme1]

I own both but Rolex makes the better watch.

[@C-SuiteCrypto]

Omega > Rolex

[@lavpatel682]

1932 first dive watch omega first moon watch omega bro don’t forget bro rolex just fucking export in marketing we don’t have any stock production capacity is low hight demand it’s dirty bloody mind game grey market available is all rolex model so how is this possible Boutiq doesn’t have any stock and grey market have any model available like rainbow diamond daytona

[@greeneyedwarlock882]

Can you talk any faster and make your pronunciation and mike any worse?🤯🤯

[@VectorSearch]

Rolex movement with their 32xx low amplitude problem is not reliable. Their movement has gone to the toilet. Just see the 200 page Rolex forum discussion on it. It’s sad.

[@patrickjean-philippe7679]

Wow ! Have Rolex not yet resolved that low amplitude/ timekeeping degradation issue yet ? This has been going on for years now 😱

[@cecaju9516]

@@VectorSearch I’ve not experienced this. Nether had anyone I know. We must be very lucky.

[@scratch945]

His vocal fry is hard to get through

[@michaelshirley105]

Seiko make the greatest watches Rolex are for geriatrics

[@Nakkisampyla]

Seiko

[@Superbudss]

love the videos- but stop with the cringe mr beast pictures

[@KK-qi6mt]

Rolex doesn’t bring out 007 versions of its watches. This is a bit childish on Omegas behalf. Omega has too many versions of its watches going on at any given time. Whilst I own a Speedmaster the gong must go to Rolex.

[@ALL-il1sw]

The version's myth has been debunked, Rolex has nearly as many versions of the DJ than Omega has versions of watches.

[@KK-qi6mt]

@ Yes but none of the date justs do you pretend to be a 007 agent by appointment of her majesty. That is childish.

[@ALL-il1sw]

@@KK-qi6mt who's pretending? Are you upset the movie producers chose Omega over Rolex. Nothing is forever, you never know they could choose Rolex again in the future. Would it still be childish if that happens, or would your 'opinion' suddenly change?

[@KK-qi6mt]

@ My opinion would not change bc I don’t see Rolex ever putting 007 Trademark on its watches. Rolex is a disrupter and it doesn’t follow trends. Rolex doesn’t release what it thinks that people think would be popular. Rolex releases what it wants and people learn to like it. That is why it is respected. It’s the philosophy Mercedes used to have before everything turned to sh1te. You bought a Mercedes in the 80sand 90s and you got what you got and that was enough. Nothing to question. The fact that Omega thinks it is a good idea to co-brand its watches with 007 trademark brings the brand down a few pegs (even though they make better movements etc). The Snoopy is Ok bc it actually means something and ties in with NASA and its history but not Disneyland 007.

[@ALL-il1sw]

@@KK-qi6mt Right, so Rolex never released Mickey Mouse watches then. Nor did they make a Domino's pizza watch. 😂 Don't get me wrong, most 007 seamasters are not to my taste, the rifling dial particularly comes to mind. But clearly some out there like it, and isn't that the point of business, to make something someone would buy

[@SallaLaurila]

I've recently began my obsession as a watch collector. And i must say- out of all the luxury brands I've been researching, for me the MAMACOO's watches are the most intriguing.

[@robertarthur3711]

Sorry but Rolex is far superior, Omega is a great watch at a price point. However watch lovers have both.

[@patrickjean-philippe7679]

In which ways, specifically, Rolex is a better watch ?

[@robertarthur3711]

@ I have both plus Audimars, Patek, IWC, it’s a personal style design choice, a lot of Rolexes I would never buy. Most Omega watches as well. That doesn’t mean they are better or not. Example my Mrs has many watches including Patek but she loves her 31mm oyster blue dial although her Patek is 10 x the price it’s not 10 x the watch. They all tell the same time.

[@GundaBinder-Bach]

Wow

[@JacksonTowne666]

🤑🤑🤑🤑🤑

[@floridaboybrandon954]

AYEEEE FIRST 🥇 ⌚ ROLEX WINS 🏆😂

[@Dinkys999]

Rolex yawn. Omega all the way.

[@Khanh.Nguyen369]

It’s more of a Tudor vs Omega debate nowadays. Which sadly for omega means their stock keeps dropping.

[@thetruthhurts7500]

Yes...This

[@miabeatz80]

Tudor is nowhere near Omega level. Show me their complications. Show me yearly sales that are even close (Morgan Stanley reports). Show me one Tudor selling over MSRP. Tudor isn't even comparable to Longines. 😂

[@johnt2694]

Value Retention is a big advantage. You just never know if you need to sell due to your circumstances or even if you want to sell for something else. It’s nice to know you’ll recover more of your money (or even make more) with Rolex.

[@Mega-zi7ys]

Then better not buy in the first place.

[@cecaju9516]

@@Mega-zi7ysIife is full of surprises. You can be doing well financially and then everything goes south. There’s peace of mind knowing you can sell your watch and get most or all or your money spent.

[@patrickjean-philippe7679]

Good for people who can’t afford to spend the money then perhaps they should not spend on a watch in the first place then. Watches are consumables like most things.

[@Mega-zi7ys]

@patrickjean-philippe7679 correct!

[@johnt2694]

@@patrickjean-philippe7679 That’s right, only poor people are buying Rolex.

[@ponteriomade4454]

Rolex will always be king

[@pormusic]

Never was.

[@patrickjean-philippe7679]

King of what ? Please be more specific.

[@ponteriomade4454]

@ The first to come up with basically everything watches can do.Every brand has copied there designs forever is that specific enough?

[@pormusic]

@@ponteriomade4454 it has one of the shortest histories of any major brand. They have no pedigree, their movements are so basic and classless that they cover them up. All of their supposed ‘firsts’ from the submariner (Blancpain did it first) to the explorer (Edmond Hilary never wore the watch whilst climbing Everest) is lies and marketing. It has not produced any high end horology-ever. No tourbillon etc omega have achieved vastly more in every category apart from sales to douchbags.

[@pormusic]

@@ponteriomade4454 Rolex has done zero. Brainwashed by their marketing department.

[@nr1416]

What no fake Patek phone calls this episode? What a joke this channel has turned into....😂😅

[@berniedmd1901]

It's like F1 verses NASCAR. There is NO debate here. ROLEX.....

[@thetruthhurts7500]

of course

[@jh5560]

suggesting omega is nascar when the rolex couldnt pass nasa's tests is delusional at worst and horribly misguided at best

[@miabeatz80]

Omega is busy racing spaceships to the moon 😂. Besides, Heuer is more well know in the racing world than Rolex. Btw Rolex hasn't won even 1 F1 championship 🤡

[@Sammy-sj2wo]

Omega is ugly a F men Rolex is elegant sexy

[@mirkhordalijan1724]

Omega is 10 times better than Rolex.

[@BulkMarketing]

To you

[@mirkhordalijan1724]

@@BulkMarketing in general rolex is ok

[@mema4922]

No it isn't. Just no.

[@seanlukecorroon]

Being hard to get doesn’t make the watch better. Don’t fall for the illusion. Omega had much better higher specs for a while before Rolex caught up.

[@mema4922]

@@seanlukecorroon the submariner has had a state of the art glidelock clasp for almost two decades, try again.

[@KenyOhashi]

I've recently began my obsession as a watch collector. And i must say- out of all the luxury brands I've been researching, for me the MAMACOO's watches are the most intriguing.