ROMANCE NEOLATINO LANGUAGE

Welcome to my channel! This is Andy from I love languages. Let's learn different languages/dialects together.
Please feel free to subscribe to see more of this.
I hope you have a great day! Stay happy!
Please support me on Patreon!
www.patreon.com/user?u=16809442.
Please support me on Ko-fi
ko-fi.com/otipeps0124
Special Thanks to Jake Vastola (also known as "Arrunzo")
/ @arrunzo
Learn more: neolatino.eu/index.html
Its purpose is to facilitate communication between native speakers of Romance languages by uniting common characteristics of Romance languages into one standard. Neolatin also allows non-native speakers of Romance languages to more easily communicate with native speakers.
While Neolatin can be classified as a semi-artificial language, other projects throughout history have independently arrived at similar conclusions.
If you are interested to see your native language/dialect be featured here.
Submit your recordings to [e-mail].
Looking forward to hearing from you!

[@albamart_ID]

This is kinda mixture of Spanish, Italian and Portuguese when they are still one big family and living in one house.

[@yasagarwal859]

Studio l'italiano. Questa lingua è molto semplice da capire.

[@DanielgtaLaw]

Neolatino is easier for everyone who speaks a language of the Romantic language

[@justakathings]

@@orthodox_linguistics they’re just irresistible

[@nightthemoon8481]

Of the romance family*

[@lycanrocmare6345]

⁠@@orthodox_linguistics Shouldn't that be obvious considering the topic of this video? It's a language that originated from Latin.

[@nicolaslj]

It is the romance languages family, not romantic languages

[@yellow9053]

@@nicolaslj pretty romantic too

[@Aleiza_49]

I'm an English speaker (albeit with a good understanding of Spanish, and the history of Latin) and I'm beyond impressed. I could actually keep up with most of it even at full speed. It sounds like a proto-Italian before the -as plural became -ai -> -e. It also has proto-romance consonant clusters intact CL in clamare, instead of Italian chiamare and Spanish llamar. Good job 👏

[@joluisvalville7391]

Mi lengua nativa es el castellano ( Español) y entendi un 97% de este hermoso idioma ❤❤❤

[@user-nv4lc6yy7o]

hablo frances italiano castellano y un poquito de portugal y lo entiendo todo sin esfuerza

[@TH3Mood08]

mi nivel en español es A2 pero yo entendí mucho el idioma.

[@brunogonzalez9552]

Lo mismo digo

[@philomelodia]

Perfectly understandable. And there is gender and verb conjugation giving it the soul of a romance language. Much better than interlingua. So much better!

[@javier2408]

I don't see so much difference from interlingua, they are both completly intellegible for romance speakers, interlingua is also called neolatin

[@guernica5413]

​@@javier2408as a romance speaker, I understood it perfectly.

[@philomelodia]

@@Nwk843 I don’t know. You might want to call it something different than Latin. All the Latin purists get upset because of it. They think you’re supposed to be creating some modern variant of Cicero‘s classical Latin. There’s somebody in this comment section already harping on the presence of articles. Next thing you know, he’s gonna want clitics and declensions. I am happy with verb tenses, moods and gender. That is what interlingua was lacking. A romance language is not a romance language without those two key elements. It feels Solis and fake which is why I do not like interlingua. I cannot explain it. I instantly get annoyed and irritated when I hear it spoken. This was not the case with Neo Latino.

[@philomelodia]

@@javier2408 this has noun gender. The verbs conjugate. That is the big difference. That makes it feel real and alive.

[@mithradates]

@@philomelodia A friend of mine wrote something on the subject before. Occidental looks Romance but quickly establishes that it's not Romance, Interlingua is more deceptive there. And of course Neolatino has gone all in on Romance and that seems to work. His quote: "I once wrote that when you visit Interlingua, it answers the door in a Romance mask, ushers you inside, exchanges pleasantries, and goes to get you some tea. Then it pours the tea on your head and reverts to the mask. "Is something wrong?" When you visit Occidental, it resembles some Romance languages you've known, but it looks more like a creole of Romance and English. It almost immediately slaps you in the face, says, "I'm not Romance," and then invites you in and is a gracious host. In other words, it establishes independence early on, and you either accept it or leave. Interlingua maintains a Romance guise most of the time, only to do something really alien when you aren't expecting it."

[@Jusats]

Why does all latin languages sound so freaking beautiful and romantic?

[@romandiazallegue1992]

I agree that they are beautiful (at least it depends on what each person considers beautiful) with some exceptions (such as the guttural R in French). Although the romantic thing, I don't know if it has more to do with stereotypes and similar things that are thought and said about languages.

[@Squinkamel]

Romantic derives from "romanice loqui", "roman speaking". Romanice>romance

[@kaylo3780]

Soy de Paraguay y entiendo casi todo , increible

[@WagnerSilva-te4zq]

Eu também entendi tudo!!

[@_xXNeyXx_]

Èo tambène comprèndei pràcticamente toto, en mèa opinione cuessa lengua sè la mellîore lengua que tenta creare uno stàndarde por las lenguas romànicas.

[@MiThreeSunz]

As an Italian speaker, I found Neolatino most resembled a dominant mix of Spanish and Italian when heard with some Portuguese and a spattering of French. It’s quite beautiful to hear spoken! 😊🇮🇹🇨🇦

[@user-lb4lm9zq6d]

It sounds to me like a mix between Italian and Spanish.

[@gustavovillegas5909]

Hablo español y he aprendido italiano y latín. Entiendo casi todo

[@SeDice_hispanoAmerica]

Castellano

[@odilusporce8814]

Sou brasileiro e entendi 100% só ouvindo. Viva as linguas românicas!! O império romano ainda vive na lingua, escrita e sociedade!

[@hectoralarconhabif2590]

This is so interesting!! I understood quasi everything just by listening avoiding reading first, at least a 92% of it. Thank you for sharing this jewel.

[@hannezzzzzzzzz]

I‘m a German & this language sounds for me like a mix of Spanish and Italian.

[@yatamci]

I LOVE the sound of Neolatino! It really sounds like an evolved version of (vulgar) latin. What I like most is that it sounds like a language that could actually be spoken somewhere in Europe. Most other auxlangs don't sound that natural because they focus more on easy grammar and strict rules (like Esperanto). For me. Neolatino seems like a more Italian sounding version of Interlingua. Definitely want to learn more about Neolatino!

[@ncmariofan3605]

It's Spanish, Italian, and Portuguese in a blender; with a hint of French

[@TheReal_GMan]

Hablo Español y sé un poquito de Italiano y entiendo casi todo

[@lycanrocmare6345]

@@Nwk843 Bro shut up, you bored or something? I've seen you replying to people with this same stupid comment. Hush lmao.

[@SeDice_hispanoAmerica]

Castellano

[@fabiorjr77]

As a Portuguese speaker I understood more than 90% of what was said.

[@BergoBadures]

It was a nice video, Andy! Keep working, you are great at this. I really liked the project and I have never heard of it. 😲

[@arrunzo]

Per que non espàrgîas la voce sopre lo neolatino ad toos amicos? 😃 (Why not spread the word about Neolatin to your friends?) And yes, Andy is VERY talented!

[@dalubwikaan161]

Oh my gosh. There should be a discord or a channel of this.

[@stlouisramsfan03]

I love these videos! They evoke a sense of happiness and joy. I love it! :)

[@edwardgrenke6417]

I can understand this. I took 7 years of French, 7 years of Spanish between the twis I can understand Galician, Italian, and read the portuguese.

[@guillermorivas7819]

Neo-Latin Romance is definitely like a blend of Spanish and Italian -- especially the lord's prayer, numbers, and vocabulary. I understood 99% of what was said. This is likely how Latin sounded back in the 10th century.

[@mithradates]

Okay, listened to the whole thing. At 9:47 if you change the speed to 175% and listen it really sounds like an angry Italian bird making the hand/wing gestures and everything

[@arrunzo]

Los fillîos: 🐤🐤🐤 Lo leone et lo escrìcciolo: 🦁 🤌💪🐦

[@gordonpi8674]

Also, there is Lingua Franca Nova! Written with Cyrillic script too.

[@cleitondecarvalho431]

Interslavic ?

[@gordonpi8674]

@@cleitondecarvalho431 that one too, but Lingua Franca Nova for sure has an option for writing it in Cyrillic. I assume because of the Moldavian and Romanian which are (were) written in Cyrillic alphabet.

[@thibistharkuk2929]

Sounds pretty similar to me as a portuguese speaker trying to communicate with hispanophones x)

[@Capibaracapibara1992]

mexican spanish speaker here, i understand like 90-95%

[@_xXNeyXx_]

Sè una lengua molto interessante, salutos dès Brasile.

[@davochinomalo]

Es la mejor lengua para la comunicación interromance.

[@SeDice_hispanoAmerica]

No es la iberomance

[@davochinomalo]

@@SeDice_hispanoAmerica De las lenguas ya existentes y de escala universal es sin dudas el sustrato de las lenguas iberromances, en especial el del español, el que más sirve para el principio de intercomprensibilidad e intercomunicación panromance. Sin embargo, hay lenguas no universales en el Mediterráneo, y también lenguas construidas como esta, que son más eficientes para comunicación de pueblos latinos en Europa, excluyendo a los pueblos latinos y criollos del resto del mundo.

[@liorchavez3739]

Multo bene! Toto excellente.

[@lycanrocmare6345]

Auxlangs that prioritize understandability are miles better than those which prioritize simplicity amd easiness in my personal opinion. I definitely plan on learning this, hopefully there are resources available.

[@arrunzo]

The official website has a grammar guide, dictionary (both a PDF and dictionary application), and a conjugation tool. In addition, my channel will have tutorials soon, besides KZbin Shorts/TikToks.

[@manmann1693]

I ABSOLUTLY FUCKING AGREE!! If you want people to use/learn a conlang then zonal auxlangs are the way to go I am not bashing on good conlangs like esperanto but learning languages has incentives to it that make people want to learn, like for example cultural interest and business etc. Take toki pona for example, a conlang so simple that anyone can learn it in just 3 days, but you don't see it in the streets, just because a conlang is simple and easy doesn't mean people are going to learn it, nearly every has that quality conlang, so youre going need to offer more incentive, so why not make a zonal auxlang? That type of conlang gives more incentive than learning natural languages because- A. Conlangs are easier than natural languages by their design And B. Able to Speak to People Who Speak different languages Other than english, romance languages are one of the most popular languages that people learn and by making a mutually intelligible zonal auxlang of them hell of a lot of incentive to learn them Why just learn French with its confusing rules, silent letters, words that doesn't spell out the way you supposed to say, etc when you could just learn Romance Neolatino and speak to ANY romance speaker right off the bat? If you talked to anyone on the street of which language would they rather learn 10/10 they would learn Romance Neolatino instead.

[@zinedineriahi9508]

I 💔 That Language

[@mithradates]

Oh neat! I wasn't expecting Neolatino to follow Occidental. Definitely one I would like to see used more.

[@SaturnineXTS]

Amazing to finally see a material about this language! I'd really love to see it grow in popularity, since it's like a better, more complete Interlingua without the unnatural simplifications.

[@icestorm_rb9057]

For some reason, to me it sounds like a modern Italian language that has a lot of influence from Spanish. Maybe that's just my bias because I am learning Spanish as of the moment, and the Italian languages are the closest languages we have to Classical Latin. I love the idea of this language though! I wish we had that same idea but for the Austronesian languages; a neo-austronesian language if you will. Essentially take bits and pieces that make the most sense from all the Austronesian languages, and then arrange them together to create neo-austronesian.

[@lanovusme]

This is very interesting!

[@jose_2030]

Im brazilian portuguese native speaker, this sound like spanish

[@philomelodia]

I’m a native Spanish speaker. It reminds me of Italian.

[@Hamzachebbi137]

Nice video 😍😍💪

[@modmaker7617]

Now people please finish Folkspraak so we can have a Germanic equivalent of Interslavic and Neolatin. Finally we can have the European trio

[@alanguages]

Cant' see Folkspraak or any other constructed Germanic language become Intergermanic ever be actualized. Reality already has English and the Germanic speaking countries learn English growing up in school. Many people voluntarily learning something like an Intergermanic constructed language for communication is effectively not even slim, just none.

[@Igro-eo2bx]

Du ha recht, dat ware wirklig good, ig ha okso tenked af en trio af Europeisch kunstlig sprake, Romanisch, Slavisch on Germanisch. Befor twentig jare, ig ha maked "Middelspraak" as de "Inter-Germanisch Interlingua", on kort after dat ig ha finded dat daer ware alrede "Folkspraak". Ig ha werked for maenig jare lang mid ander folk an de Folkspraak-projekt, doch in de end, dat ha nig kommed antil een samelig Folkspraak.

[@InAeternumRomaMater]

Neo-latin must be put as a secondary language in all Italic European countries to make communication easier between us and to have a common language together. Maybe one day we will be united under one banner🇷🇴🇫🇷🇮🇹🇪🇸🇵🇹❤️‍🔥🏛🦅

[@matthewsaitta7092]

SPQR

[@SaturnineXTS]

I definitely love the idea of there being an interlanguage taught at school as a second language or something, so that it's at least easy for different Romance speakers to communicate. Of course English largely fills the role of the lingua franca, but it doesn't exactly have the Romance spirit

[@MoisePicard-no9by]

I wouldn't learn it. I am perfectly fine with French.

[@Lampchuanungang]

​@@Nwk843 Correct easies post romanic idioms nowadays are better than romanics idioms and latin, we need connection never separations. History flows for front not for behind. 🏄🏄🏄🏄🏄🏄🚣🚣🚣🚣🚣🚣🚣🏊🏊🏊🏊🏊🏊

[@FilipeCardoso1]

Muito bem, gostei ❤

[@mistakenmeme]

Solo puedo hablar y leer un poco de español, pero pude entender mucho.

[@_xXNeyXx_]

Comprendo plus de 90%

[@user-xc3xk6pw2m]

*Learning Romance Neolatino conlang, which is based on Romance languages ​​derived from Latin, will give you some advantages when traveling or attending talks, shows or lectures in the countries you mentioned. These advantages include:* *1. Basic understanding: By learning Neo-Latin Romance, you will have a foundation that will allow you to understand and communicate, at least on a basic level, in languages ​​such as Spanish, Italian, French, Portuguese, among others. This is useful in everyday situations of interacting with local people.* *2. Grammatical Similarities: Romance languages ​​share many similar grammatical characteristics, which makes learning Neo Latin Romance beneficial as you will be able to transfer this knowledge to other languages ​​of the same family in an easier way.* *3. Similar vocabulary: A large part of the vocabulary in Romance languages ​​has a common origin in Latin. By learning the Romance Neolatino conlang, you will be familiarizing yourself with words and vocabulary roots common to several Romance languages, facilitating their recognition and understanding in different contexts.* *4. Cultural Interaction: Learning Neo-Latin Romance will allow for a better understanding of the cultures and traditions of the Romance-speaking countries you mentioned. You will be able to more fully appreciate the music, literature, film and other cultural aspects of these regions and interact more meaningfully with the people.* *However, it's important to point out that while the Romance Neolatino conlang can provide a useful foundation, each Romance language has its own quirks and differences. Therefore, it is beneficial to also consider learning the specific language of the country you plan to visit or interact with in addition to Neo-Latin Romance.* *Have nice weekend with God and positive vibes, positive friday,saturday and sunday for you 👍 be safe*

[@michakoodziej5741]

For me as a Latin teacher, it sounds like Spanish with Italian pronunciation. Great idea, but somehow I don’t like the accent signs. Great job.

[@jmarcoss]

Dá pra entender quase tudo, mas achei italiano demais!

[@cheem-creem3622]

I'm not totally fluent in french but i got very little from it

[@danascully6698]

@@Nwk843 Eventually Spanish, not French.

[@barrigudo00]

Adoro tua voz.

[@alexbardas724]

Sounds like a slightly re-latinized Italian with Spanish plurals (very simplistic view :P)

[@keithjeremiahl]

I noticed that any word ending in Tate is from Romanian (Fraternitate)

[@RicardoBaptista33]

This language is a simulation of what classical Latin would look like if it had evolved up to the present day. What amazes me the most is how similar it was to Portuguese than another Romance language, in this case to medieval Portuguese. 😲 As Portuguese, I understood 100%.

[@RicardoBaptista33]

@@Nwk843 Where you from?

[@aleksanderh.5407]

@@Nwk843 😅

[@yorgunsamuray]

This does have some synonyms derived from various resources. Even having two nouns of different gender.

[@Lampchuanungang]

They left the academic sphere a long time ago and are already on a social level.

[@yimveerasak3543]

Do you websites or resources to learn this language further? Thanks

[@Davlavi]

Interesting that fasinating.

[@megapeiron]

I support Neolatino ✅

[@lugo_9969]

Reminds me of Lingua Franca Nova....which is very similar.

[@hglundahl]

1:40 Is the main difference between Ido and this: a) the inclusion of smaller languages, like Arpitan b) the exclusion of Romance vocabulary in English c) the non-simplification of conjugations?

[@jaydengreenberg9618]

I wonder if French and Romanian speakers can understand this spoken since they're very divergent from the other romance languages and share less intelligibility. Does this work for all romance languages, or just Spanish, Portuguese, Italian and other regional Romance languages in Europe?

[@arrunzo]

I'm not sure about spoken comprehension, but I informally tested tested written comprehension one time with speakers of major Romance languages (Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, French, and Romanian) and predictably, speakers of Spanish, Portuguese, and Italian understood the most, whereas French and Romanian speakers had more difficulty understanding, but they still understood most of it. At least a written text, anyway. Keep in mind that Neolatin is not only based on major Romance languages, but also smaller, regional Romance languages as well, so that factors into intelligibility on some level. And of course, all intelligibility depends on how speakers express themselves to others, because there are often different choices of vocabulary that are more or less intelligible to speakers of certain Romance languages.

[@CrysolasChymera2117]

I'm going to answer the question: I speak romanian, I'm native and even though is pretty distant from what romanian is, I can say that is quiet a good attempt to create a comon latin language, so from the romanian point of view it has many words that I could get as close to romanian ones. Mayne 75% of it? Approx.

[@zuarbrincar769]

​@@CrysolasChymera2117 I love the Romanian language ❤

[@sirsn5760]

Well this language really do it's job, as a Brazilian portuguese speaker I understood 90%.

[@_xXNeyXx_]

Et tambène la lengua sè fàcile por apprèndere, la estao apprendèndo dès 17(dèce-septe) días atràs et ja lo parlo molto bène, èo parlo portughese como lengua matèrna.

[@Andre-ps8xp]

A gramática das preposições e artigos são tão antiquadas.em português já resolvemos isso😎🤙

[@maraluciaduclosduclos7496]

Easy tô make It out. Portuguese is almost the same. Perfect. I loved It.

[@luismanuelgutierrezolivera9143]

This is 60% italiano, 30% portugués, 5% español, 5% the rest of latin languages

[@deaeth1411]

I am so happy of my mother tongue be romantic 😃

[@WedsleyFelix]

What is it?

[@deaeth1411]

@@WedsleyFelix Portuguese

[@deaeth1411]

@@Nwk843 Ok, thanks

[@hglundahl]

Where exactly is The Wren from?

[@lafelicitaapiccolisorsi]

Quali sono le principali differenze fra il Neolatino Romance e l'Interlingua IALA?

[@almaespirito3021]

Okey, so: Marrone = Mardone Birra = Birda Territorio = Terditorio Horribile = Hordibile

[@jorcaiba]

Lo locutore (que ha facto uno ingènte lavore preparando cueste vídeo) non èst parlante nativo de una lengua romànica. Pròpriamente, rr en neolatino sòna como en castellano, catalano et italiano.

[@user-uo6gp6xh3b]

As a spaniard, i love this

[@dpr9921]

It sounds like a Classical Latin speaker travelled forward in time and is forced to speak Italian

[@vlagavulvin3847]

Omit these articles, for the great justice ))

[@philomelodia]

No. All modern descendants of Latin have articles. It would be weird if they were not there.

[@fratarta6009]

It is italo-spanish.

[@onlcool]

Bonne initiative, mais ça ne marche pas pour les francophones..

[@L-Ogre]

@@Nwk843 No, the goal of Romance neolatino is to be easy to learn for all Romance language speakers, but this is not the case for French speakers. you must have noticed the many comments from Italian speakers, Spanish speakers and Portuguese speakers who understand all, or a large part of Romance neolatino. for them this project works. but a French speaker doesn't understand anything, just as we don't understand Italian, Spanish or Portuguese. the fact that our languages are sisters does not mean that they are intercompreansible. For us, learning Romance neolatino would take as much effort as learning any other Romance language, and honestly, if we had to go to that much trouble, we'd prioritize learning a real language. Sorry for my english (google trad)

[@jaydengreenberg9618]

You made a video on Interslavic and Neolatino Now make a video on a Intergermanic language

[@yatamci]

I'd also like to see a video about Folkspraak and Folksstem/Nordien/Nordienisk for example 😊

[@jaydengreenberg9618]

@@yatamci Theres also Teutonish

[@alanguages]

There is not an official Intergermanic. Folkspraak was the closest constructed language, but failed due to splinter groups forming. Effectively Modern English is reality's Intergermanic. The Germanic countries learn English in school and are exposed to the English medium in one way or another.

[@nomore9004]

​@@alanguages Sad

[@luizfellipe3291]

(my opinion based on seeing the video and being a native to Portuguese) Neolatino wants to be as inclusive as it can be, but sometimes it leaves behind the Iberian languages. Some vocabulary words turned out completely different in Iberia compared to the other languages. (Like how Latin's word for yellow, galbinus, became amarillo/amarelo becouse the color yellow was associated with strong emotions, mainly love [ to love = amar ]) I am no french speaker, but I can guess that some words also leave french behind becouse of its uniqueness and germanic influences

[@arrunzo]

Comprèndo lo que dices, mais exsíste un cèrto número de paraulas exclusivamente tropatas en lenguas romànicas de la península ibèrica, que si fossen usatas, resultaría en una lengua distorsa vèrso lo castellano et lo portughese. Obviamente, èst qualcausa que non havería sènso en moltos casos si lo objectivo "globale" èst communicare-se con totos los paeses latinos. En un caso assí, bàsicamente sería una lengua "panibèrica" estrannîa, mais ad lo mesmo tèmpo, non lo sufficièntemente panibèrica, et consequèntemente, una solutione que non satisfarà ad necuno. Et claro, tène en mènte que cuesto non vòle dícere que ja non exsíste moltos cognatos "ibèricos" en neolatino, mais pènso que la clave accuí èst que la paraula en questione deve èssere tropata, en cèrta mesura, en altra lengua nonibèrica, mesmo si èst un uso menos commune. Espero que te hajja sirvito.

[@luizfellipe3291]

@@arrunzo I see... yeah, it makes perfect sense. By the way, are you involved with the creation of the language?

[@arrunzo]

@@luizfellipe3291 Envòlto en la creatione de la lengua? Depènde de lo que vòles dícere con cuello. Te dirai que non so linguista, donque ("então") non me dedico ad cèrtas questiones linguísticas en quanto ad la grammàtica que pòten èssere tròppo complicatas por una persona como èo. Non èst mèo trepallîo et pènso que moltos subestiman la difficultate en codificare la lengua, et como si mesmo una sola parte èst alterata, altras partes terminan cambiando como ensèmole/conjunto. Non obstante, sí hai facto suggerimèntos sopre lo vocabulàrio et expressiones en neolatino por una vera communicatione. Ad parte de cuesto, altrosí ("tambem") hai ajjutato ad (en menore mesura) disseminare et ensegnare la lengua ad altros. En altras paraulas, so un tipo regulare con un interèsse activo en lo projècto. Allora, por contestare toa demanda, sí, estao envòlto en lo projècto et la communitate, mais non me dedico de una manaria profonda ad la codificatione de la lengua en si (ad parte de altras causas, como locutiones et altras expressiones por conversationes). Mais havemos una communitate activa onde parlamos neolatino et discutimos divèrsos tèmas.

[@luizfellipe3291]

@@arrunzo que èst "tròppo" ?

[@arrunzo]

@@luizfellipe3291 "Tròppo" = "too" en anglese, donque, "tròppo jóvene" significaría "too young". "Tròppo" correspònde con lo italiano "troppo" et lo francese "trop".

[@Carmiel_Balfont]

I get the point. It's like evolved latin, but I doubt that this language can take any root since Latin already did. With it's fame, latin cannot be replaced by neolatin, even to the small degree it's used today

[@joaomartins9800]

They are very different, including in terms of usefulness and function. Latin has fame, history and prestige, but it's actually very difficult to understand for speakers of romance languages. This is mostly because latin grammar is very different from its descendants. I'd say romance languages in general are closer to reach other than they are to latin. Neolatino takes the common features of modern romance languages, making a language that is intelligible for almost everyone who speaks one of them. If someone was searching for a common language for all romance nations, neolatino would probably be a better alternative than latin.

[@tece-me]

I have my own opinion about this artificial language, but anyway. As a portuguese speaker, I understood most of it.

[@RVG_]

it's basically Italian but with a lot of S at the end of the words

[@user-fl1dc9ju3g]

Sounds like mix of italian and latin.

[@jairosouza7994]

Looks like a mix of 70% Italian and 30% Spanish.

[@Animazione_2438]

It sounds quite medieval to me!

[@chaosunleashed274]

Pretty cool, personally I'd have gone with a betacist system that merges short and long variants for both vowels and consonants, sets the accusative as the standard for all nouns and keeps three verb conjugations with a single synthetic tense for each mood while taking the remainder of pronunciation straight out of Classical Latin, so it would kind of look like this: "patre nostru kwi estas in kelos, este santifikatu tuu nómine, bénia tuu renu, este fata tua boluntate, in tera komo in kelu."

[@chaosunleashed274]

@@Nwk843 , actually I just made it up based on the criteria I mentioned, these verses in my initial comment are all there is.

[@chaosunleashed274]

@@Nwk843 , sorry, but it's not an actual conlang, it's literally just those three lines of text. You can refer to it as Interlatinu if you really want me to name it.

[@albertosigler4374]

Ay caramba!

[@carpetanoknight9727]

Soy español y entiendo todo, es verdad que echo un poco de menos el típico sonido de las lenguas romances que es la Ñ, GN, NH, NY, hay en palabras que la NN hace ese sonido y hay otras que no. Pero bueno está bien

[@romandiazallegue1992]

Y yo, aunque creo que podrían añadir la "ŋ" que si no me equivoco es como se representa el sonido de la ñ en el alfabeto fonético internacional.

[@lycanrocmare6345]

@@romandiazallegue1992 No, "ñ" sería "ɲ". "ŋ" es el sonido de "ng" como en i*NG*lés.

[@jorcaiba]

Salve! Lo neolatino sí presènta la n palatale, que èst uno sòno típicamente romànico (como altrosí la l palatale). Se escrive nî (aut nnî quando èst dople) et appare en paraulas onde lo latino haveva ni/ne + vocale, como vinea > vinnîa. Lo castellano presènta lo sòno altrosí en altros casos que non son panromànicos.

[@javierhillier4252]

very similar to Occitan

[@albertosigler4374]

El volcán de parangaricutirimícuaro lo quieren desparangaricutirimicuarizar; el que lo logre desparangaricutirimicuarizar será un gran desparangaricutirimicuarizador

[@danascully6698]

This invention sounds more like neo-Spanish with sprinkles of Italian, traces of Romanian and Portuguese and no traces of French!

[@alexander72184]

Philippine Spanish w/ Cuban Spanish next ppllllzzz 🇨🇺 🇵🇭

[@lyvras]

Nice video but I am so confused with the dude narrating the stories. his pronunciation is all over the place and sometimes he makes an accent were there is non, the other time he doesnt stress the vowel; sometimes he pronounces the word qui as ki and sometimes as kwi (persequirai 9:25); ce is pronounced che but sce is prounounced sse? but then sîa is pronounced sha? why isn't sce pronounced she?

[@arrunzo]

Salve, amico! I'm the speaker in this video and I assure you that most, if not all of these pronunciations were deliberate. Allow me to explain (information also available in part in the official grammar guide on the Neolatin website): 1. The pronunciation of "ce" and "ci" -ce = [ʧe] and ci = [ʧi]. -che = [ke] and chi = [ki] -The only words where "que" is pronounced as [ke] and "qui" is pronounced as "ki" are the words: que, qui, quèn (or compound words, like qualque) -In virtually all other cases, the sequences "que" and "qui" are pronounced as [kwe] and [kwi] respectively: donque, questione, cinque, tranquillo. In fact, there is a "mixed case", because the word "quionque" is pronounced as [kionkwe] because the ending -onque actually comes from the Latin "umquam". So, "persequirai" would in fact be pronounced with [kwi] and *not* [ki]. In other words, it is not a mistake, but how the sequences "que" and "qui" work in Neolatin, depending on the word and etymology. 2. The pronunciation of "sîa" and graphemes In regards to your concern about the pronunciation of "sîa", take a look at the graphemes below: = [ʧ] before (basically functions as the English "ch" in a word") = [ʤ] (sounds like the English "J") = [ʎ] (corresponds to the Italian "gl", Portuguese "lh", and in the past, the Spanish "ll" before it was simplified by means of yeísmo) = [ɲ] (corresponds to the Italian "gn", Portuguese "nh", and the Spanish "ñ") = [ʃ] (like the English "sh") 3. Is "sce" pronounced as "she"? As far as I know, hasn't officially been codified in Neolatin because the evolution and pronunciation of from Latin into modern Romance languages is different, not to mention different etymologies to take into account. Therefore, I chose to simply pronounce it as [s], because I thought that would be the simplest thing to do for now. Pronouncing as [ʃ] (the English "sh") may not necessarily be more correct than a simple [s] at this stage, and already exists as [ʃ] (like the English "sh") in Neolatin. However, that wouldn't necessarily mean you could write "sîèntia", for example instead of "scièntia". In the end, it's a complicated question. It depends on the etymology of the word and observed characteristics between Romance languages, so it's not nearly as simple as "plug and play". I hope this was informative for you!

[@nyko921]

​@@Nwk843are you just supposing he's italian? Because I am and that accent doesn't sound italian at all, there are many words that are exactly the same as italian but he doesn't pronounce them with an italian accent. Seems like a spanish native speaker from Latin America trying to imitate a stereotypical italian accent

[@lyvras]

@@arrunzo thank you it was actually very informative I was just confused about the irregularities of the spelling.

[@arrunzo]

@@lyvras Non hi ha de que, amico! I understand that the orthography can seem strange or confusing for the uninitiated. There are linguistic reasons for why words are spelled the way they are in Neolatin, even if some may not always agree with the solution. Some people to this day have varying opinions about how things should be spelled, like using "ny" instead of "nî". Believe it or not, despite being the speaker and writer of this video, I myself don't think that Neolatin's spelling is perfect. However, I understand that the project will never please everyone. I prefer to focus on using the language in a productive manner instead of changing things constantly. This gives me more time to clarify doubts where I can, such as your perceived "irregular" connection between "sî" and "sc" where there was, in fact, none, because it's not obvious at first glance.

[@sonnymak6707]

Hows that different from interlingua

[@arrunzo]

There are major differences between Interlingua (IALA) and Neolatin (Romance Neolatino): From the beginning, Interlingua was developed as a general International language, based on the perceived commonalities and shared cultural heritage of European languages, meaning not specifically based on Romance languages. For Interlingua's development, Interlingua had primary control languages that majorly affected the selection of vocabulary and its grammar (Spanish/Portuguese, French, Italian, and English) and secondary control languages that played a smaller role in selecting vocabulary (German and Russian). Interlingua was made to be simplified, where if even one grammatical characteristic was absent in a control language, it was removed. This is why there is no present progressive tense in Interlingua (ex: I am eating), because it was absent in French. English is a major influence behind why Interlingua has simpler conjugations and overall grammar. In contrast, Neolatin doesn't try to be a general international language. The only concern of the project is for speakers of Romance languages, and Romance languages only, to communicate with each other by scientifically creating a common standard. It's the same as how a language like Interslavic is only concerned with speakers of Slavic languages, but in this case, Neolatin is only concerned with speakers of Romance languages. Hence, Neolatin conserves basically all the characteristics of real Romance languages. I also include a succinct list of differences: 1. Interlingua does not have grammatical gender (ex: la aqua). 2. Interlingua has less verb tenses, such as the present progressive tense (ex: I am eating), the distinction between preterite and imperfect past tenses, and the subjunctive tense. 3. Interlingua does not have noun-adjective agreement (ex: los libros). 4. Interlingua is also based on non-Romance languages (primarily English, in terms of its simplified grammar) and to a lesser extent, German and Russian for international vocabulary. 5. Interlingua does not have conjugations (ex: Tu vedes). 6. Interlingua does not have diacritics (ex: lo tèmpo). 7. Interlingua uses words directly from Classical Latin, such as "hic" and "igitur", instead of their Romance language forms (if they exist) or equivalents.

[@oscebe2691]

French: droits Spanish: derechos Portuguese: direitos Catalan: drets Occitan: dreches/drets/dreit Italian: diritti Sardinian: deretos Romansch: drets/drets Romanian: drepturi No Romance language has the CT cluster in that word. The word has often been re-borrowed from Latin with it intact, but with a different meaning ("direct" rather than "right")

[@mysteriumvitae5338]

Neo-Latin? To me, it rather sounds like a kind of Para-Italian. In this video, there are two or three words reminiscent of explicitly Classical Latin. And the accent and the grammar are nearer to Italian than anything else from a non-Romance point of view. Beginning with the articles, a thing unheard of in Classical Latin (unlike in Classical Greek).

[@philomelodia]

It’s patterned after the lower register of late vulgar Latin as opposed to classical Latin. this is not supposed to be a modern interpretation of the written language of the empire in its high register. It’s trying to bridge the gap between all Romance languages. It does that admirably. I am a native Spanish speaker and have studied Portuguese, Italian, French and can understand many of the minor ones. They did a great job with this language. All of us would be able to understand it perfectly well. If somebody did a news broadcast in this language, I do believe every romance language speaker would be able to follow it with very little trouble.

[@nkman672]

Sometimes, what we hear as a non-Romance speakers are far from behind. Agree too, it sounds like Italian. But considering that Italy is once part of the Rome Empire, influence can be showing. Otherwise, great opinion

[@mysteriumvitae5338]

@@philomelodia I see. Well, yes, I listened to Late Vulgar Latin on the same channel and it does sound a lot like this. What I would like to listen is a comparison of Classical Latin and Vulgar Latin of the, say, 1st or 2nd century AD or even the 1st century BC (the real Classical century). The late Vulgar Latin of the 5th century AD already sounds like a full-fledged foreign language compared to Classical Latin. But I doubt it was that way in Caear's or Cicero's times. The spoken Latin of simple people probably was less compicated syntactically than the polymorphous structures of classical Latin. But that's it.

[@happysolitudetv]

Anglish but Romance

[@angelferrandis6089]

Now interlingua please

[@hmmm2983]

The true Xioma

[@AlexAlex-jk6uq]

They forgot to add words from romanian :( It s mostly italian + spanish....

[@AlexVictorianus]

Sounds like Sardinian

[@Ardn4089]

jajaja séx

[@dmitrykozhin6884]

Sounds to me like an Italian person speaking Castilian language 🤣

[@Reazzurro90]

I think it's a beautiful language but I don't understand the purpose of creating an artificial pan-romance language when Latin already exists and has already functioned as a neutral language among nations.

[@galfridus8413]

Spanish can totally replace this

[@user-ie6ql9gl3t]

1:03 Ha ha ha Romance Interslavic language, Романскы меджусловјанскы језык!😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆

[@modmaker7617]

Da, pravda neolatinsky jezyk je medžuslovjansky dlja romanskyh jezykov. Да, правда неолатинскы језык је меджусловјанскы дља романскых језыков.

[@muhammedjaseemshajeef6781]

It should be the new international language ❤

[@lycanrocmare6345]

Yeah, no. It's not made for that purpose nor would it be fitting.

[@guernica5413]

Among romance speakers only.

[@AigroM]

Frenchs and Romanians, is it good to to all latine became an unique language again?!? As portuguese speakers it is fine, ok, it will strange fell a mix italian and Spanish. But i can hold it!!!