Round 5 | Jean-Emmanuel Depraz vs Simon Nielsen | Standard |

[@Senior_Whooper]

What a well played game by JD

[@PooptyPoptyPip]

Lets go!!!

[@powerplay1939]

You have to explain everything you do so annoying.

[@keith2056]

Such a laughable thing that this teams run the same deck all tourny. True stupidity. First off there's what 3000+ cards available if not more that are legal. And your telling me that exact deck is to your mind invincible. It literally is stupid , your better off having a different deck on a group of two or each person your error rate goes down and it lets unthought of perks show up. Idk this is just dumb seriously. And the worst thing if you meet a deck that shreds through that deck you have other people that can counter it.

[@TheKeepon]

This is a 1v1 game, not a team event.

[@keith2056]

@@TheKeepon they are playing exactly the same deck, they're on the same team. They talked about who would win based on their opening hand on each game. I'm talking about the game with the teammates playing one another and they said the team is all playing the same deck with basically the same sideboard

[@AstoranSolaire]

They collectively decided this was the best deck in the format after presumably extensive testing. So they all decided to play it. This is not a team event, they get zero benefit from their teammates doing well, the team is just a testing team, nothing more. Your arguments are entirely illogical.

[@MrMoman7]

​​@@AstoranSolaireExactly. 'Arguments' like "true stupidity, [so many cards, why no play?].. literally stupid.. [never heard of error rate?] ..just dumb" - assuming the best magic players in the world are not able to entertain this thought and have to be stupid to converge on the same idea - keith seems like a delusional guy, not sure wether laughable or pitysome.

[@MrMoman7]

Nobody tells you that the choice of deck is invincible. You don't seem like a serious magic player, ~35 playable cards are way tighter than you seem to grasp. Sure, every teammate could fiddle with a few copies (many do), but the core idea of a strong deck can be quite objective, they just take a very educated meta-guess. You obviously don't even know that the teams are just for testing, but you lavishly write about the obvious stupidity of professional magic players. Quite confident my guy.