Royal Australian Air Force 2024 | Aircraft Fleet

[@CallsignEskimo-l3o]

Stephen Chappell definitely looks like his old man. He could walk out to bat number three for Australia and you wouldn't know the difference.

[@Abeeshy]

Nice video

[@TacticalWingsOfficial]

Thanks

[@BOB-xo1wb]

Nice

[@diptanumallik5895]

I heard from NGC that they are only operator of F-111 outside USA

[@gibbo_303]

*were

[@user-pz9ct8zi3d]

Was really lucky to see the F111 in low level reheat, that was at Geelong ages ago, was star of the show.

[@jabs767]

Nice video But..... a few detail errors! Since when is the F-35 a 'conversion trainer?' One of your 'Super Hornet' images is in fact a classic Hornet? Yes there is a photo f a classic with a Super (Rhino) but...... One of your P-8 images is reversed making the serial number backwards...... ????

[@TacticalWingsOfficial]

Thanks for the info!

[@phillperry487]

2OCU (Operational Conversion Unit) based at Williamtown trains new F-35 pilots. Still fully capable though.

[@davidcrandell1172]

When did the MC55 Peregrine start in service?

[@srijibmondal4045]

Air force chef was son of greg chapel

[@ayo-v1p]

The first theme song, I need the name pls

[@TheGreatMarathaArmy]

#Tacticalwing......Does the Bangladeshi guy deleted the reply?

[@TacticalWingsOfficial]

Yes, he deleted the comment after I intervene.

[@jarinummey2499]

@@TacticalWingsOfficial what had that Bangladeshi guy said?

[@TheGreatMarathaArmy]

@@TacticalWingsOfficial 👍

[@Eera778]

Pakistan navy

[@chandrachurniyogi8394]

U.S. shouldn't be selling naval jets to foreign air forces around the world or it's very own air force for that matter . . . the F/A-18 Super Hornet multi role all weather fighter is designed & built for the navy only . . . not air force . . . it undermines a navy's very essence & it's constitution as a omni role defensive force . . .

[@xlerzyfishy6469]

Womp womp

[@stinkeyiphone3870]

@@chandrachurniyogi8394 Canada bought F-18’s 40 years ago and even though they are old now, they’re done everything a fighter needs to do. Navy jets are just normal jets with some carrier modifications

[@juneabbey9538]

Naval fighters tend to be more rugged and reliable, have longer range and endurance, and are much better at operating from short or improvised airstrips than air force jets. For these reasons, they were a much better choice for Australia - also Spain, Norway, Canada, Switzerland, and others. Naval fighters can be and often are outstanding performers even when operated from land - the classic example is the superb fighter McDonnell designed for the US Navy, which ended up serving, largely unmodified and complete with tailhook, in the US and many other air forces around the world. It was the best and most successful fighter of the era and many thousands served with distinction.

[@stephenbachman132]

You do understand that is a very silly way of looking at sales for aircraft.

[@gibbo_303]

its not that deep bro, its not that deep

[@matrempit6409]

Don't hurt aborigin

[@alexlanning712]

you'd be laughing if you got the money they get

[@matrempit6409]

Don't hurt aborigin

[@stephenbachman132]

?