#RX10IV

This is part 5 of what started out as a four part series of the #FZ1000ii being compered to the #RX10IV. The pictures are Jpegs straight out of the camera, The RX10IV Jpegs are a litter larger than the FZ1000ii Jpegs out of the camera.

[@largeeddie]

First off, the photos are beautiful, and that has very little to do with either camera. It's mostly about who's taking them. I couldn't see much difference at original resolution after video compression, or any really. The Sony would give more editing options by holding up better at higher zoom, if you needed that. A lot of the differences between the two (24 fps continuous still shooting for example) seem to be "if you needed that" features. Btw, I checked the specs and it looks like the RX is more than a third heavier than the FZ. Maybe because the Sony's higher zoom ratio and longer max focal length needs more glass? Do you notice a difference carrying them around? I guess that could also account for a lot of the price difference. Lenses expensive fast when you start pushing the specs. Great content once again!

[@georgeeharrison4293]

You will notice the weight difference when you are carrying both of them, but you quickly get use to the weight of the RX10iv. You pointed out a good point, the weight difference is the Sony has 18 glass elements and the Panasonic has 15 glass elements and the Sony is weather seal

[@mikefromtown505]

Both are pretty close. Again with your other tests, (I think) the colours of the FZ photos look more true to life. The RX photos seem more vibrant. Both take excellent photos. Why do the Asheboro street signs have an elephant on them?

[@georgeeharrison4293]

Asheboro is the home of the NZ State Zoo