Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Legends videos kzbin.info/aero/PLEMWqyRZP_Lq9j4Wz2QHo6dptTW3-tdIo Please click the link to watch our other French Systems videos kzbin.info/aero/PLEMWqyRZP_LoxjAFtfDr8wwS6K_51gZ0x Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Legends-Air videos videoskzbin.info/aero/PLEMWqyRZP_Lpl6SQpA2WBti_WsykOgtgy
@davidmok1086 ай бұрын
Great video as always! Can't wait for the next Z8 Chinese super frelon copies
@nixops16 күн бұрын
My first flight was on a Super Frelon as part of our training in the South African Defence Force in 1980. After a windy fume laden noisey boarding I found myself sitting opposite the open door. Then we lifted and for a few minutes I experienced helicopter flight. What a rush!
@Cyan_Nightingale6 ай бұрын
Frelon/Super Frelon is a beautiful heavy helicopter, much more beautiful than the Mil Mi-8
@zacklewis3426 ай бұрын
But on par with the Mi-26, which it more closely resembles.
@Cyan_Nightingale6 ай бұрын
@@zacklewis342 It's between Mi-8 & Mi-6 in my opinion. Which is fantastic still
@mohammedsaysrashid35876 ай бұрын
It was a wonderful video about French designed heavy Helicopter SA 321 ferlon ...video clearly explained all characteristics of that remarkable helicopter. Video also labeled to historical background of that flying heavy weights...thank you 🙏 ( weapon detective 🕵️♂️) channel for sharing.
@habahan42576 ай бұрын
Good video. Thanks. But, I think it was the rival of CH-53 rather than SH-3.
@tayron30586 ай бұрын
CH-53 is heavier and can't swim
@casuallatecomer75976 ай бұрын
Nah it's definitely meant more to compete with the Sea King rather than CH-53, the Super Frelon has more similarities with Sea King in terms of capabilities (large naval helicopters with amphibious capability) than with the CH-53.
@zoltanbokor3126 ай бұрын
Can you do an episode on the m47 dragon? Never seen a video on it :)
@gilangfaizpangestu11436 ай бұрын
IDAF used 321F, I've seen the airframe long time a go but now I don't have idea where's the airframe
@bennetto756 ай бұрын
The Libyan Super Frelon in Malta were not leased but the Libyan military was based here
@WeaponDetective6 ай бұрын
Thanks for info
@bennetto756 ай бұрын
With 3 SA3160 alouettes
@wiktorberski92726 ай бұрын
It was strange, at least in my opinion, to call such a huge helicopter a Wasp
@biocaster7775 ай бұрын
The German call their superheavy tank "Mouse"
@MaxKrumholz6 ай бұрын
Check Fact - in Sinai - Sharm El Sheikh - was Established by Israel AFTER capturing Sinai after 1967
@trespire6 ай бұрын
The military grade concrete airstrip at Sharem is still in use today by commercial airliners.
@dr61246 ай бұрын
DO THE SPEAR3 MISSILE BY MBDA!!
@CROM-on1bz6 ай бұрын
Given the size of the hornet I have a hard time imagining the blade of grass.😏
@georgecastiblanco29786 ай бұрын
Aparte de Francia la República popular China lo usa y lo ensambla para su armada y ejército popular de liberación incluso es superado por el eh 101 Merlín ,el CH 47 Chinook y el CH 53 superstallion de sikorsky en Europa ya es raro verlos como dije antes lo usa china para todo . 😮😮😮😮
@RectalRooter6 ай бұрын
Interesting information. I was not aware of that 👍
@Sir_Godz6 ай бұрын
i cant wrap my head around the NH 90 models and why they all seem to be lemons.. How the F can airbus make a product that fails so hard in this day?
@kesterdonner81906 ай бұрын
Actually, it’s a joint venture of Airbus, Leonardo and Fokker. But that does not explain the sometimes very disappointing performance results of the NH90 family…
@soumyajitsingha96146 ай бұрын
NH 90 sucks that's why Australian Navy and Indian Navy purchased MH 60R Seahawk
@CROM-on1bz6 ай бұрын
However, in France the NH-90, although requiring delicate maintenance, is more than 75% operational. It may not just be the helicopter that has a problem, it may be the qualification of the mechanics that is a problem.
@Monkey-ud8bw6 ай бұрын
No it’s definitely the helicopter, Sweden relies on the Blackhawk now as the NH90 is so expensive to run, and they aren’t the only ones.
@Monkey-ud8bw6 ай бұрын
She is not a looker.
@chandrachurniyogi83946 ай бұрын
the Aérospatiale SA-321 Super Frelon multi mission helo is just too big for a fast & flexible ship-borne maritime multi mission helo . . . the SA-321 is a direct competitor to the ship-borne MH-53KU Sea Stallion II maritime multi mission utility helicopter . . . both airframes have proven their worth & still continues to do so for more than quarter of a century . . . the prototype fuselage design should have been carried over to the SA321 final configuration prior to pre-production . . . instead of the modified boat type fuselage . . .
@SamerMahroos6 ай бұрын
Good information, but the narrative is biased. The planes that the Israelis destroyed in Beirut airport were all civilian, but you only labeled the Iranian oil tankers as "civilian" ships. Those ships are the reason the war lasted eight years due to Iran's refusal of a ceasefire. The Iraqis had to have them sunk. The Iranians only accepted resolution 598 a full year after Iraq due to Iraqi dominance in the Gulf by sinking any ship that dealt with the Iranians. This was achieved by the efforts of the Iraqis in the Super Frelon, Mirage F1, MiG 23, and 25. It wasn't an easy job, but it was done. Also, the liberation of Kuwait was in 1991, not 1982, as you mentioned.
@WeaponDetective6 ай бұрын
Thanks for your interest. We mentioned Iranian tankers as civilian ships because we divided civilian ships and naval vessels in our narration. And when we mentioned the planes in Beirut we used civilian plane footage. So, we did not need to use the term "civilian" specifically. Sorry for our mistake of referring to the year 1982 for Operation Daguet. Even though we double-check our text, we occasionally fail to notice such things.
@tayron30586 ай бұрын
Due to its rotor design, it was an American achievement, not a French one. This was why many countries preferred the original American helicopter, the Sea King.
@CROM-on1bz6 ай бұрын
It's like saying that it's the propeller that makes the plane. What you are saying makes no sense.
@tayron30586 ай бұрын
@@CROM-on1bz I'm just saying, that designing a fuselage was not a success in the 1960s. No stealth and ancient aerodynamics knowledge. The rotor and gearbox were the real deal at that time. Obviously, they were not French.
@RectalRooter6 ай бұрын
@@CROM-on1bz I can see both of your points and I think both of you are right. Ingenuity, evolution, enhancement, and perfecting all tie into and feed new revolutionary ideas.
@Cyan_Nightingale6 ай бұрын
Different class. Sea King is akin to the newer Eurocopter Puma. Super Frelon is bigger.
@gian.43886 ай бұрын
Countries "preferred" the Sea King because, as they were developing their own version, and here I'm talking about France (Super Frelon) and Italy (Agusta A101) in particular, Sikorskyi made sure to sell them the Sea King's license, so a double win for Sikorskiy because it both eliminated the potential competition and made a ton of money too Sikorskiy also lobbied the US gov to refuse the US-101 (us version of AW-101) when the US DOD chose it in 2005 (Just to make it clear, A101 and AW101 are two different helis from completely different periods)