Samyang AF 35mm f/1.8 FE lens review with samples (Full-frame & APS-C)

It's exciting to see another lens in Samyang's persuasive 'Tiny but Mighty' series - hopefully one day these lenses will find their way onto Canon EOS R and Nikon Z mount cameras, too.
Find it here (Amazon affiliate link - many thanks):
USA: amzn.to/2Tquxcl
UK: amzn.to/31IwKVb
All pictures taken by me on Sony a7R II and a5100 cameras.
Support me on Patreon! / christopherfrost
Equipment I use to make my videos (Amazon affiliate links):
Canon EOS R5: geni.us/CanonE...
Canon EF-RF Adaptor: geni.us/CanonE...
Sigma 50mm f/1.4 'Art': geni.us/Sigma5...
Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 IS STM: geni.us/CanonR...
Marumi Fit and Slim CPL Filter: geni.us/Marumi...
AudioTechnica AT2020USB+ Microphone: geni.us/AT2020...
Rode Smartlav+ Microphone: geni.us/RodeSm...
Rode SC3 adapter: geni.us/RodeSC...
Zoom H1n Recorder: geni.us/ZoomH1...
DJI Mini 2 Drone: geni.us/DJIMin...
Music:
'Opportunity Walks', Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)
Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0
creativecommons....

[@klu_productions]

After 7 years, finally, a small budget full frame autofocus 35mm comes to the e-mount. There must have been a conspiracy for all these years that one was never made. Samyang finally came through! I have their 45mm f1.8. I'm excited for this 35!

[@PetrKlapper]

I blame Sony RX1 - my theory is Sony knew very well what's the essential #1 lens for a full frame camera, but "reserved" it for this "failed luxury camera".

[@trym2121]

And there's still nobody touching 50mm range except samyang.

[@klu_productions]

@@trym2121 thats true. all the fe 50mm for sony are either impractical for everyday use, cost nearly a grand, or mediocre autofocus...thank goodness samyang finally answered the call with a descent nifty fifty.

[@klu_productions]

@@PetrKlapper sounds like a plausible theory to me!

[@PatrickWeichmann]

@@klu_productions The 55mm F1.8 Sony Zeiss is an awesome lens, costs about € 750 and is very practical for everyday use. The AF on my A7iii works just fine. Even the very cheap 50mm f1.8 Sony for under € 200 is quite good. The AF may not be the best but it's definitely usable. Nevertheless, I'm looking forward to test the Samyang 35mm f1.8 as I haven't been fully convinced that the Sony 35mm f1.8 is worth more than € 700. If just the Sigma 35mm f1.2 would be cheaper... and smaller... hehe have a nice day :)

[@theizza68]

This is like the Sony a7iii of samyang lenses. Exciting times!

[@nashsok]

Seems like a great lens to pair with Samyang's 18/2.8 & their 75/1.8!

[@HGQjazz]

I wonder how it clmpares with the 45mm 1.8

[@j16m02]

Now, if Samyang would just make a tiny 400mm f1.8! ;-)

[@csabagrunfelder]

HAHAHAHA... I want a 135mm 1.8 FE AF 🤪😆😍

[@xdrew707x]

I heard they have it in development, same size as the 85mm 1.8 🙌 👏 ....but the front element and filter thread is also 400mm hahaha 😆 🤣

[@alexaudiovisuals]

@@csabagrunfelder it would be the best day if they ever just decide to stick an AF Motor in their amazing 135mm f2

[@Anarki2U]

@@csabagrunfelder Sony 135mm 1.8 GM are the best

[@Anarki2U]

I will be happy with a 400mm 4.5 or 5.6

[@gamingwithbee9258]

How do I see no comments mentioning the dropping acid line? I literally burst into laughter. Great review!

[@SirRelith]

I've been comparing sony fe 35mm lenses this past week and you release this video. What a coincidence! I almost pulled the trigger on the sony 35 1.8, but now I think i'll wait for your comparison with samyang's. Love your videos as always. :) thx!

[@mpcbsar]

So many budget lenses now. Makes me happy.

[@alvarob17]

Thanks for the initial review. Yeah, a comparison video against the Sony 35 1.8 would be great. Actually, even against the Samyang 1.4 would be nice to see...

[@Pablo-bo6cp]

Please, make also a comparison with Samyang 35mm 1.4 Thanks!

[@stuartfit]

The core concepts of mirrorless has been small and light with similar or better photographic results. Those are the reasons why I moved to Sony mirrorless back in 2012 and why I stayed away from those big Sigmas and even the Samyang FE 35/1.4 and went with Zeiss 55/1.8. This lens shows Samyang is moving towards those core values, in fact the recent Sigma's 85/1.4 also indicated similar path.

[@stefan_becker]

No it wasn't. The core concept was to save money for the mirror and the mechanics. The nice side effects were better viewfinders with preview of the image, eye autofocus, better video, better optics because of smaller flange distance and so on. Smaller and lighter cameras were also a side effect, but not the primary reason to develop mirrorless cameras. And if you ask me, it's still not the main reason to buy a mirrorless camera. The other positive effects are imho far more important.

[@InterMaus]

Can't wait 'till Nikon and Canon mirrorless mounts start getting these 3rd party AF lenses adapted to them natively.

[@RealRaynedance]

Samyang have at least managed to get their AF 85mm f/1.4 onto the RF mount. So maybe there's hope that something will happen on the Z mount around when the Z6 and Z7 get replaced.

[@LuigiVN]

My RP is CRAVING some third party affordable glass. I mean I love having the EF adapter but it makes some lenses huge. My 16-35 f2.8L II looks more like a 200mm f2.8L on it.

[@shang-hsienyang1284]

Switch to Sony if you really can't wait. Samyang, Sigma, Tamron, all the affordable but great performance lenses are available for Sony.

[@RealRaynedance]

@@shang-hsienyang1284 I would say the same thing if someone has small enough hands. But as someone currently on Sony with big hands and fat thumbs, I also wish Canon and Nikon could get the more affordable lenses because of how much better the other cameras fit in my hands.

[@shang-hsienyang1284]

@@RealRaynedance Sony cameras out of the box is too small for me too. But I have paid US$50 and got myself a metal bottom plate from China. Problem solved. Nikon cameras don't even support vertical grips, which is even more unacceptable for me.

[@venom5809]

LMAO at the "dropping acid" comment, you are the last person I ever expected to make a joke like that. 😂

[@stefan_becker]

Thanks for the great review. This Samyang seems to have a better bokeh than the Sony version. For me this would certainly be a reason to prefer the Samyang over the Sony.

[@hasanmaherashid]

I love Samyang!!

[@driftx2]

My absolutely favorite lens. On my camera about 95% of the time.

[@amaday84]

Can't wait Nikon Z version!

[@maximme]

thanks for a VERY GOOD presentation with good vocals and clear pronunciation. Obviously well prepared scripts and you seem to know the product well and the confidence shows. keep it up.

[@pauldb5]

I was eagerly waiting for your review, thank you! I'll buy it as soon as possible

[@bijujohn8814]

I am also using A7rii, planning to buy Samyang 35 f 1.8 after your review. Greetings from India, Kerala.

[@fjp2000]

Thats the video ive been waiting for!!😍🙏🏼

[@willcrespo24]

Excellent, your the only revewer I actually trust fully! Keep up the good work.

[@thirdmort]

Please do a comparo vs the Sony 35 1.8!!!!!!!!

[@RealRaynedance]

My problem with this is that their 35mm f/1.4 is only $100-$150 more (it never sells for the listed $800). But at the same time, you're paying for the size and weight savings and the focus speed with this, so I can't really fault it for that.

[@mattltech]

Chris just made a "dropping acid" analogy. Interesting.

[@nicolask.3825]

not the first time he did, either, though I forgot where the first one came in. It was during one of his tests against bright lights, and thus probably on a weird/budget lens.

[@j16m02]

Hmmm. Still waters run deep. LOL

[@llagona]

@@nicolask.3825 Please, Could someone comment any hidden meaning of the joke for non english native speakers? As I understood he is meaning he was encouraged to abandon drugs... but I'm far from sure

[@nicolask.3825]

@@llagona "dropping acid" just means taking the drug. I don't know why dropping is used for acid, but it is.

[@JerryWilliam63]

@@llagona as Nicolas K. points out, dropping acid means consuming LSD, Chris Imagined that if one were to use LDS while reading from Greek text, that it would look similar to the longitudinal chromatic aberration that the Samyang lens is projecting. LoCA, LoCA mesmo!

[@avishmayovitsh5038]

great review as usual! i was looking forward to this review just before i’m ordering this lens. it will be nice to see how it compares to the sony 35mm 1.8 :)

[@christiansperling9615]

Great review as always and the first one of this lens I have seen online! Appreciated. Really looking forward to the comparison video with the Sony 35mm F1.8. If you could also include at least briefly Samyang's 35mm F2.8 in your upcoming video that would be fantastic!

[@alexaudiovisuals]

This is amazing, blows both sonys (the full frame and the APSC) out of the water for that super cheap price. Such a shame I don't like the 35mm focal length and their 45 isn't nearly as sharp, gonna have to stick with my bigger and prohibitively expensive Sony Zeiss 55

[@acouragefann]

The 45mm is sharper at equivalent apertures. check lenstip.

[@zollieuncle9647]

I always watch your well structured informative lens reviews, it serves me a respected reference point. This time I was a bit suprised when you covered the close focusing performance of this lens, claiming that the lens is rather soft at f1.8 at its minimum focusing distance, however, shows excellent image quality when stopped down to f4. Even this moderately wide angle lens has just 7mm DoF at f1.8 and even at f4, the DoF is just 20mm. What is the relevance of being soft at f1.8 at 29cm focusing distance? It almost seems like, you intended to balance all the pro's by at least one, or two con's (softness @MFD and LoCa) in order to make your review more relaistic.

[@lamontgilliland9664]

Chris, another very well done review that is a pleasure to watch with a morning cup of coffee. Looking forward to your comparison review with this Samyang and Sony's 35 f/1.8.

[@GaryJahman]

Looks like a nice walk around prime lens. Thanks again for the video mate. The thing with Samyang lenses is that after using it, you somehow are longing for the more expensive Sony or Sigma lenses

[@acouragefann]

I went back to my samyang lenses after lugging around heavy and somewhat flashy Sigma lenses. I'd rather shoot the 85mm 1.4 from Samyang all day than the same lens from the art series (Sigmas color also tend towards the cool and sterile)

[@beriteri]

Watching this review side by side with Sony FE 35 1.8 review it seems to me that Samyang is actually better. Also weather sealing in this one looks better. And it's quite easy to defringe in post. Samyang has more noticeable vignetting though.

[@jakeyulo8738]

Thanks for another great vid! Would love to see the comparison with the Sony version, specifically with AF speed

[@torbenlysholm1]

Oh, please do compare those two 35/1.8 lenses, Chris! That's a very relevant comparison in every way. I'm eager in particular to see how the colour fringing compares. I think I spot the same kind of nice colour rendition (very nice green nuances) in this lens as in their 45 and a bit of the same depth perception/3D-like look ... I hesitate to call it background separation, because it's not just from subject to blurry background. Anyways, I'd love to see your comoarison of those two.❤️

[@geonerd]

That is surprisingly compact!

[@nealrichmond4588]

IMHO the EOS R platform doesn't need this particular lens given the already excellent 35mmRF (with image stabilising), but would like to see this small form factor and cheaper prices at the extreme wide angle on RF mount. Weight and price really do come into play with Canon's current other offerings (i.e. heavy and prohibitive). As ever, thanks for a thorough fair minded review

[@davejpr]

Great reviews Christopher and I purchased the Samyang 35mm f2.8 based on an earlier review as well as the 18mm and 75mm from more recent reviews of yours. I wondered if you could compare the Samyang 35mm f2.8 lens to the Samyang 35mm F1.8. I mainly shoot landscapes so the fast aperture is not necessary, but I wondered if the f1.8 is sharper in the corners at f5.6 to f16. I have a 42 mp camera, the same as your Sony but your original test for the 35mm f2.8 was on a 24mp APS C camera.

[@jobveldhuis8168]

Please make the video about comparing the sony and the samyang lens! Excellent reviews!!

[@reddawn87]

Haha did not expect the dropping acid while reading the Bible.. Will be eagerly awaiting for the comparison video! I'm right on the fence between the samyang and the Sony equivalent now. There's only about 100usd difference between the Samyang new and a 2nd hand FE35 where I live.

[@sselh]

Looks like a breathtaking lens for the price!

[@tebscat]

Another excellently executed review. I've this year bought the Sony 35mm f1.8, but I'm not kicking myself too much, as I've had some great images from it. But for my use case, it looks like I could have had a month of groceries as well this lens. And... Given your take on colour fringing at 8'10", I'd love to see your review of the Adobe Capture phone app...

[@patrichclausen3827]

This seems like its gonna be a best seller! Im definetly getting one

[@nisar_adil]

Cant wait for Samyang and Tamron lenses for Z mount !

[@cyril4494]

Thank you for this complete review.

[@dominic-ryan]

Thanks so much for reviewing this prime, really been looking forward to it as its performance (especially for video) is a key part of my decision as to wether or not to migrate to the A7C or A7S III from my current Panasonic M43 kit. Crazy to think this lens is only 90g heavier than my Olympus 17mm f/1.8 lens which is really the M43 eqivilent. For your comparison with the Sony 35mm f/1.8, it would be great to see some continuous AF examples for video. Coming from Panasonic whose CDAF DFD auto focus is close to unusable, I would love to get a better understanding of the video AF on this new Samyang lens is bad outright, or just bad compared to the best Sony lenses for Video AF.

[@hagentrondheim3675]

the wait was worth it. Finally Super review

[@CrossfeetGaming]

I should have invested on Samyang

[@michaelgoodwin4480]

Thank you! Would you consider comparing this lens to the 45 f1.8? And maybe even the 75 f1.8? Great video as always 😁

[@darkprofile]

Chris you may ask fuji 50mm f1.0 demo from fujifilm to test few days. I aprraciate your reviews. And waiting for first fuji film f1.0 lens review.

[@CHTFilms]

brother.. is the manual focus mechanical.. I mean is it changing speed if you rotate the manual focus ring faster/slower or the speed is constant? that's very important because I want to calibrate it with a focus motor of a gimbal.. and if it is changing speed it is unusable!

[@korson333]

I’m courious how it’ll behave in a low light situations. I already ordered mine 😉

[@JonniArmani]

Great review C,) Samyang is a great lens I love that you and I are both still using the A7Rii lol it’s still a top notch camera 🙌🙌 cheers,)

[@user-qc2uv2gk4d]

Would love to see a review on nikon z50 or any lens that can adapt to it like meike 25mm 1.8

[@turkey744]

I can confirm, that definitely looks like texts after dropping a lowish/mediocre dose of acid.

[@stars7931]

Samyang should make a 35mm 1.4 AF for Canon RF mount. There is only the 35mm 1.8 or options with the mount Adapter. Would be great with native RF and f1.4

[@johnnytwo-shoes9798]

Long time viewer, first time commenter. Do you think the samyang 35mm 1.8 is worth the upgrade if you own the samyang 35mm 2.8? In terms of sharpness mainly. I kinda like the idea of weather sealing and having 1.3 stops more light but love the size of the 2.8 on the Sony A7r body for a nostalgic film sized camera set up.

[@ActuallyMeister]

Chris, how does this compare to the Samyang 35mm f1. 4? Is it worth the extra $120?

[@TheRedSatan10]

Cutest lens ive ever seen!!

[@CodeTravelwithRizwan]

Nice. Can u plss review of tamron 28-200mm. Also on nikon z 24-200mm. Thanks..

[@johnniebao6163]

I bought samyamg 75mm 1.8 which is in the same line with this lens. Exactly same design. Dust between the elements, exchanged another copy, got more dust into the lens after half day of use. Maybe I'm the individual case or I had bad bad luck, but il stay away from samyang af lenses although their manual ones are very good.

[@mikhail5647]

I am wondering how would an image from Samyang 35 1.8 on full frame compare to Viltrox 23 1.4 on a cropped sensor in terms of bokeh. Should be virtually the same, though I would love if anyone could share their thoughts!

[@legend240891]

can you please test it con AF-C as well? I believe it's way faster than AF-S since it's use phase instead of contrast-detection autofocus.

[@spirithealershamanism]

Logos on acid. Yes I was paying attention. Funny!!! Thanks for the review

[@youuuuuuuuuuutube]

The bokeh/rendering seems better than the Sony version, but it has more color fringing, and is less sharp. Still, great option.

[@paulbeckmann]

Great review!

[@ArikGST]

Wow, that`s an impressive Lens for the price! Wish you would have given us a sample of how the autofocus works and sounds in video mode :/

[@dionamuh]

Don't do this Samyang, I don't want to replace my tiny 24mm and 35mm f2.8 lenses with f1.8 ones! I think I'll stick with the f2.8 version though. Super small, and great image quality.

[@Philodrone]

I'm still on the fance whether to buy 2.8 with small form factor or go brighter and twice as big, ahh...

[@torbenlysholm1]

I've had both the 24 and 35 f/2.8 and sold them again. I found the 35 a bit boring and the 24 unuseable with it's very mushy corners. Both have quite narrow barrels and I believe that's the source of the problems. Too little glass to handle the light and it has to project the image onto the sensor at too steep an angle. Too cheap (for full frame lenses) to expect excellent quality, but 1. they're still great for Instagram, regular Facebook stuff, vacation stuff, and I think the 35 sure does have qualities. Particularly if you shoot b&w, then the "boringness" is gone. I don't think it resolves colour particularly well. Especially greens. (Goes for the 24 too.) I have described it's rendition before as being "coarse" and when experimenting with composing the same images with that and much bigger glass, the 35 seemed almost ... well, not "grainy" but ... "coarse" and not nearly as smooth and clear. Anyways, I loved the size of them and I saw that Sean Tucker gets great images out of his 35/2.8, so how could I, clearly his inferior, not be happy with that lens. Well, I wasn't. But I have and love their 45/1.8. It's slightly bigger barrel does it for me. I can still spot a tiny bit of the same phenomenons, but here it's not as pronounced and it's only the pixelpeeper in me that is a tiny bit bothered by it. The true photographer in me is very happy with that lens, and it has several other great characteristics that makes it punch above it's weight class. 3D-like rendering, excellent colour rendition (love the greens), low distortion, very good resolution ... It sure ain't a boring lens. This 35/1.8 seems to share many properties with the 45. I'm only a little worried about the colour fringing.

[@steventhomas231]

These Samyang primes are excellent for the money.

[@hdigermul]

Are you planning to review the Samyang 35-150mm? If so, could you also check if the zoom range is as claimed? SoMe says it’s actually 38mm

[@HappyHubris]

Christopher, can you please add some thoughts about the 45mm Samyang vs 35mm Samyang in the comparison video?

[@christopherfrost]

Take a look at my review of that lens :-)

[@shazbk7616]

Thanks for the great review, and as always! By the way which school did you go to? Thank you and God bless!

[@mauricerijnders3507]

Thanks for the review! Like your test program. I cannot understand though how the sony 35mm 1.8 ranks so bad... We use a lot of, often very expensive high end, gear every day and we love the rendering and the end results of the Sony 35mm 1.8. Even on out a7r4. Other colleges share this conclusion. The sony 35mm 1.8 is a silent sleeper that wasn't even launched properly by Sony (see also the findings of Ted Forbes, the art of photography). We often have a situation where someone in the team says "wooow, which lens was used here??" to find out it was the Sony 35 1.8... Hie can that be? Based on your review people are missing out a truly great lens :-/

[@circleofattention6021]

Nice pouch!

[@6gwilliams]

He talks about focus hunting and says the Autofocus is uncertain, yet he is testing with a two-generations old AF system. Why won't he rent or borrow a current Sony camera for his tests. Current lenses should be tested on current bodies for best and most accurate test results. Why test new 2020 tech on an old body with 2015 AF tech.. I had an A7RII and i can tell you there are huge advancements now. Cheers

[@elkwewwef]

Right... A7III is a tremendous step forward vs A7R2.

[@user-mx2ib3qs1u]

He tested the Sony 35mm f1.8 in the same camera though. And probably he will do the comparison test on the same camera too. So if Samyang is lagging behind in AF, it will lag behind in newer models as well. Plus, not all of us have upgrade to a7r3 or 4, anyway...

[@christopherfrost]

He probably would, if it wouldn't cost him £700 or so to make the upgrade. Why not lend your support on Patreon, if this is something that is important to you :-)

[@giac01]

Damn I just got the 35/2.8 samyang on eBay. That being said,I mainly got it for travel and don’t need the 1.8 too often...

[@ipahlev]

Hi Chris, nice video! I wonder if your lens has any noise at autofocus motors?

[@Mebtaku]

And there it is available! £279!

[@raphaelserrano4086]

Great review Chris, its good to know that Samyang is adding some amount of weather sealing on these budget lenses. I find the coating on the 85mm 1.4 AF showing a reddish hue on my raw photos, do you notice a similar hue with the 35mm 1.8?

[@christopherfrost]

Not really

[@raphaelserrano4086]

@@christopherfrost thanks for the response Chris, that is good to know.

[@Robertobinetti70]

Thanks

[@TheDogogd]

Looks like it could be a good astro lens, if you still have it, any chance of a stary sky sample and what is it like to manually focus on a star with its focus ring

[@kaushaltiwari9773]

How is the performance on a A6000 series body?? Compared to the Sigma 30 f1.4? I already have the Sigma 30 f2.8. It is quite sharp but slow in less than ideal light. I just sold the Sigma 30 f1.4 because my copy had AF issues even after the firmware update.

[@srijonmondal8842]

Please review the 28-200mm tamron

[@quasarcreator]

Was literally thinking "Damn that looks like reading on acid" then you said exactly that :')

[@jlexploretheworld1164]

Please make a comparison with Sony 35mm.

[@JB_Hobbies]

I may have missed it in the video, but how does the custom switch operate in manual mode? Does it work as an AF/MF switch? Or if that is not the default operation of the switch, can AF/MF functionality be programmed with the dock? Thanks.

[@HacDau]

great review as usual! could you compare this lens against the samyang 45mm f1.8?

[@christopherfrost]

Check out my review of that lens :-)

[@hans-jrgenbernhardtsen8506]

What is longitudinal chromatic aberation?

[@gurudeclan]

Significant CA

[@elkwewwef]

vs what ?

[@gurudeclan]

ZlXKx6rQ1aeuC insignificant CA

[@elkwewwef]

@@gurudeclan Of course vs a specific lens yardstick :)

[@JeanV1986]

Thanks for the great review(s). I have a question: can you tell me if the build quality is comparable to the 45mm from the same company? Though I really like the optical performance of the lens, this is the very first time I am genuinely unimpressed with its build quality. I don't have anything against plastic, but this lens really feels cheap.

[@christopherfrost]

They're quite similar

[@francisjameskho937]

I have aperture ring issue with that lens right now. i love the lens but there is aperture ring issue.

[@trym2121]

Will you review Viltrox 56mm any time soon?

[@christopherfrost]

There should be a review out now

[@gokulnanda8776]

Please make some video reviews also.thnx

[@Mebtaku]

I was waiting for this review but knew from first time I heard rumours about this lens, that it will replace my trusty 45 one day 😀 anyone else checking shelves at E-Infinity shop? 😄

[@andreasbuder4417]

E-infinity is grey market no warranty Hongkong Import crap. Good luck, if you have a problem of any kind, receiving a bad copy or receiving anything at all. Are you trying to advertise for e-infinity?

[@carbon6372]

Andreas Buder E-Infinity is a great option for a lot of people that want to save a bit and don’t mind not having a decade of warranty. I bought over 10 items on there (both expensive and average-priced). Only 1 item was slightly decentered which isn’t dependent on the seller but the manufacturer (unless they somehow damaged it under transportation or so). Even so, I got a full refund without any hesitation from their side. Also, I returned multiple lenses as I simply just didn’t want them anyway. No problems. Now, I do get that a lot of people want warranty and are a bit sceptical of how it is transportated, but I’m sure that one would already know within the short warranty if the item is damaged or so, and can return it for a refund. If faults happen after that period, I’m sure it’s dependent on the user and not the manufacturer or the lens itself. A lot sleep on warranty but the users are the majority of the factors causing the faults in the long one, unless the fault is implanted beforehand as a fault under construction, transportation or planned obsolescence. Anyhow, most equipment last decades if people just take care of it and make sure to inspect it closely and be conscious of variation right after buying it, to make sure that you haven’t gotten a faulty copy beforehand (decentered or other faults, which are caused under the construction and not the user).

[@Mebtaku]

Andreas Buder this would by my 4’th lens I got at einfinity and never had a slightest problem. Yes, they like to take couple of days to pack the order but it is always full pro service. Do I advertise? It’s just a bit of kind customer advise towards friends photographers. 😉

[@Mebtaku]

Just got brand new for £289 so really cheap as for this lens. From first shot can see clearly that dropping 45mm on eBay to could get this one was nothing to regret 😃

[@mr.dikkens]

How would it compare with the samyang 35mm 1.4? I can purchase the 1.4 for only 50 euros more in NL. (aside from the size difference)

[@nicknick099]

Hi, Can the Samyung use in body correction jpg? On the sony a7 series???

[@jcg4350]

I've counted 18 "too" in the video, seems a code addressed to the NKVD.

[@charliobrown3960]

How compares with a loxia 35mm? I don’t find any vs of this two lenses

[@malkhaz88]

Great review! what do you think about this samyang vs sigma 35mm art 1.4 ?

[@christopherfrost]

Take a look at my recent review of that lens :-)

[@Athiril]

If you do a video comparing it to the Sony, can you compare them at like 1-2 metres focus distance? A distance someone might use for portraits

[@christopherfrost]

That is the approx distance of my test chart (it's a large test chart)

[@PatrickWithCamera]

Im considering this samyang for my aps-c, is it sharper at 1.8 than sigma 30mm f/1.4 @ 1.8 ?

[@dandy.pradana]

It looks like a very good lens! Any information on how does this lens perform in eye-AF mode in A7Rii or A7iii? Compared to the Sony equivalent

[@christopherfrost]

Should be fine :-)

[@dandy.pradana]

@@christopherfrost thanks for the reply!