Shubuhat Series #3 - "Hudud" (Penal Code In Islam) | Mohammed Hijab

Shubuhat Series #3 - "Hudud" (Penal Code In Islam) | Mohammed Hijab
-
Help us educate and mentor others to share the faith academically.
Donate now: sapienceinstit...
Free online courses: learn.sapience...
Free books: sapienceinstit...
Have doubts? Book a mentor: sapienceinstit...
Listen (Podcast): sapienceinstit...
Follow:
- Facebook: / sapienceinstitute.org
- Twitter: / sapienceorg
- Instagram: / sapienceinstitute
Articles, speaker requests & more: sapienceinstit...

[@ymsyms2760]

01:00 understanding zina 08:04 zina punshmint 17:00 stealing 25:48 compassion 28:08 Hiraba

[@MohammadQasim]

Advertise on your main channel to grow sapience pls

[@hamzakhan-um8zh]

assalam o alikum brother I love your channel

[@MohammadQasim]

@@hamzakhan-um8zh walaykumus salam jzk

[@CordobaGeneral1234]

I agree, alot of people do not know about this. Brother Mohammed hijab should post this valuable content on his account

[@hamzakhan-um8zh]

@@MohammadQasim wa iyaak

[@overdose8329]

It’s not as good tbh

[@mystichalaly8083]

Harsh sentencing for harsh crimes. It makes perfect sense. People won't complain about these laws when someone breaks into their house and kills their entire family

[@mystichalaly8083]

May Allah SWT protect us from the punishments of the hereafter.

[@ayyylmao101]

27:04 It's true - letting compassion deter you from dealing justice ironically inhibits you from expressing compassion towards the victims and society through that justice.

[@shahid8545]

Human beings need strict laws, strict laws promote security, security promotes comfortablilty and comfortability promote stability and all of these are required for a just, peaceful and sound society free from corruption.

[@CheyenneIvory]

May Allah swt bless the team at sapience institute

[@thesalafilight3374]

Ameen

[@fahed2210]

Great discussion and series, a discussion on internal hell and why atheists see it a problem as we believe on an all merciful god would be great. I have noticed a lot of non Muslims have an issue with eternal hell for non believers

[@Religions.of.fandom]

Bukhari 6560 Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said, "When the people of Paradise have entered Paradise, and the people of the Fire have entered the Fire, Allah will say. 'Take out (of the Fire) whoever has got faith equal to a mustard seed in his heart.' They will come out, and by that time they would have burnt and became like coal, and then they will be thrown into the river of Al-Hayyat (life) and they will spring up just as a seed grows on the bank of a rainwater stream." The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "Don't you see that the germinating seed comes out yellow and twisted?"

[@ivandudic9230]

Do they also have problems with eternal paradise. Why only hell? Do they fear the hell as it is Real? From an atheistic eorld view the issue should be both ways. But they never ask why there is a paradise that is eternal.

[@homtanks7259]

JazakAllahu khairan

[@alberxenos]

السَّلاَمُ عَلَيْكُمْ وَرَحْمَةُ اللهِ وَبَرَكَاتُهُ As-Salaamu `Alaykum wa Rahmatullaahi wa Barakaatuhu

[@truthinknowledge8312]

Very descriptive, but beneficial.

[@finishingislamophobessubsc8156]

Assalamualaikum TIK🙂

[@stadiamak692]

Omar (ra) removed the hudud during the tine of famine. Was he a pre modernaty modernist?

[@Someone-ct2ck]

You have to bear in mind Guantanamo Bay.

[@overdose8329]

If you can please do these videos as you Mohamed Hijab speaking instead of these group sessions it’d be much better.

[@millatiibrahim2416]

Even if one argues the avoidance of implementing certain rulings of Shari'ah may be sanctioned in rare cases. The reality is that Muslim countries for example haven't in one off or multiple cases abandoned implementing a ruling out of situational benefit. They have out and out replaced the rulings with other rulings, be it in submission to their "treaties" or International law agreements. This is what we call Istibdaal in the Shari'ah which is clear cut disbelief and the system and government and its rulers who do this are also clear apostates, this is by consensus of all the jurists. So this talk of delaying, abandoning, replacing Islamic punishments is an extremely dangerous issue and to mass generalise the replacement of Shari'ah rulings in obedience to International laws constitutes Shirk and Blasphemy, making this into an issue of benefits and harms is absurd. Do you believe in part of the book and disbelieve in others? Accepting one law of a system over the Shari'ah is no different to accepting an idol over the worship of Allah, as they both constitute slavery to its owner. One is in worship and one is in rule. Allah says in the Qur'an there is no god except Allah. Allah also says in the Qur'an the rule is not except for Allah.

[@kloppcredig8460]

Brothers one thing I have not understood. The last Part, where you talk about the people which got there eyes removed - is it applicable in the sharia as a punishment or is it not applicable because it would only be justified in that specific case? I talk specificly about the eyes, because this specific thing is not mentioned in the aya.

[@sadeekahsaban162]

26:22

[@Radec913]

Perhaps another to include in the next part would be murder and what type of evidence is needed. Also the case of rape, do the same conditions apply as in zina? Do u also need witnesses for rape? or is semen inside the vagina or dna evidence enough?

[@MohammadQasim]

For the hadd(punitive punishment laid down by scripture) the high standard must be met. Darul iftaa says: If a woman is sexually abused and the attacker is not apprehended, she may seek justice through the courts of an Islāmic state. Her lone testimony will not constitute sufficient evidence to make the hadd of stoning (for a married man) or 100 lashes (for an unmarried man) binding. Rather, the Qādī and law courts will assess all available circumstantial evidence, and if there is sufficient proof to convince them that sexual abuse took place, they may enforce some form of discretionary punishment on the attacker, like a long-term prison sentence etc

[@Radec913]

@@MohammadQasim thanks for the info. This does lead me to conclude one thing, islam puts an extreme high bar on capital punishment, which for all intents and purposes is good ofcourse. Just imagine in the case of zina, i mean for 4 people to see you having intercourse you practically need to be having intercourse in a public area.

[@MohammadQasim]

@@Radec913 yep true

[@mdabullais2114]

What are you eating Bro Hijab ?

[@marioRossi-ky2hx]

Mohammed Hijab I have question: If I would give you a white blank which versionof the quran you would choose...

[@IbnThabitVerlag]

Omg you guys killing us with this fire content allahumma barik!!!^^ A new series put on our translation list for sure

[@Ali-jk3cu]

Another amazing series!!! Keep it up

[@islamupontheunderstandingo5916]

وروى النسائي (5048) وأبو داود (4195) عَنْ ابْنِ عُمَرَ رضي الله عنهما أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ رَأَى صَبِيًّا حَلَقَ بَعْضَ رَأْسِهِ وَتَرَكَ بَعْضًا فَنَهَى عَنْ ذَلِكَ ، وَقَالَ : ( احْلِقُوهُ كُلَّهُ أَوْ اتْرُكُوهُ كُلَّهُ ) وصححه الألباني في صحيح النسائي .

[@Aisha-qm7xu]

What about children out of wedlock?

[@mystichalaly8083]

what about them?

[@Aisha-qm7xu]

@@mystichalaly8083 can they have dad’s name?

[@Fahad-gf1wx]

@@Aisha-qm7xu yes

[@Fahad-gf1wx]

@@Aisha-qm7xu why ask such a specific question

[@MohammadQasim]

@@Aisha-qm7xu since the child was born out of wedlock, the lineage of the child will not be attributed to the father but to the mother. -This is a fatwa by Ml. Rayhaan Docrat, Student Darul Iftaa Checked and Approved by: Mufti Ebrahim Desai Darul Iftaa, Madrassah In’aamiyyah

[@ULTRAYOLET]

I was always wondering if regret would excuse a person from the penalty? Like let’s say there is the required amount of witnesses or a person admits to committing the act but is sincerely repentent to Allah and therefore has admitting to it because he could not live with the burden, would this excuse him? On the other hand, Allah is even so merciful to cover our sins and He wants to repent in secret. Just honestly confused about this

[@shahriar7352]

HUDUD - Abu Ibraheem Hussnayn Link: kzbin.info/www/bejne/rnXYl614adedia8

[@bilalnaseer4706]

An episode on slavery pls

[@MohammadQasim]

Dr johnathon brown has a good video on it

[@bilalnaseer4706]

@@MohammadQasim thanks, but i watched it. Not as detailed as one would expect. Plus, i'd like to hear the opinion of a more traditionalist speaker

[@MohammadQasim]

@@bilalnaseer4706 I see.

[@DARTH-R3VAN]

​@@MohammadQasim did you see and hear what he said about "supporting the right for people to insult the Prophet? " or he said something similar. That man ain't an authority

[@MohammadQasim]

@@DARTH-R3VAN he retracted.